2516.01_Attachment 1

Attach1-PPA.pdf

Assessment of Environmental Performance Standards and Ecolabels for Federal Procurement (New)

2516.01_Attachment 1

OMB: 2070-0199

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

177
December 31, 2002

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90

December 31, 2002

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990
(Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Public Law 101–508, 104 Stat. 1388–
321 et seq.)

[As Amended Through P.L. 107–377, December 31, 2002]
SEC. 6601. SHORT TITLE.

This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘Pollution Prevention Act of
1990’’.
[42 U.S.C. 13101 note]
SEC. 6602. FINDINGS AND POLICY.
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress

finds that:
(1) The United States of America annually produces millions of tons of pollution and spends tens of billions of dollars
per year controlling this pollution.
(2) There are significant opportunities for industry to reduce or prevent pollution at the source through cost-effective
changes in production, operation, and raw materials use. Such
changes offer industry substantial savings in reduced raw material, pollution control, and liability costs as well as help protect the environment and reduce risks to worker health and
safety.
(3) The opportunities for source reduction are often not realized because existing regulations, and the industrial resources they require for compliance, focus upon treatment and
disposal, rather than source reduction; existing regulations do
not emphasize multi-media management of pollution; and businesses need information and technical assistance to overcome
institutional barriers to the adoption of source reduction practices.
(4) Source reduction is fundamentally different and more
desirable than waste management and pollution control. The
Environmental Protection Agency needs to address the historical lack of attention to source reduction.
(5) As a first step in preventing pollution through source
reduction, the Environmental Protection Agency must establish
a source reduction program which collects and disseminates information, provides financial assistance to States, and implements the other activities provided for in this subtitle.
(b) POLICY.—The Congress hereby declares it to be the national
policy of the United States that pollution should be prevented or
reduced at the source whenever feasible; pollution that cannot be
prevented should be recycled in an environmentally safe manner,
whenever feasible; pollution that cannot be prevented or recycled
should be treated in an environmentally safe manner whenever
feasible; and disposal or other release into the environment should
179

December 31, 2002

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90
Sec. 6603

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

180

be employed only as a last resort and shoud be conducted in an environmentally safe manner.
[42 U.S.C. 13101]
SEC. 6603. DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this subtitle—
(1) The term ‘‘Administrator’’ means the Administrator of
the Envirnmental Protection Agency.
(2) The term ‘‘Agency’’ means the Environmental Protection Agency.
(3) The term ‘‘toxic chemical’’ means any substance on the
list described in section 313(c) of the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act of 1986.
(4) The term ‘‘release’’ has the same meaning as provided
by section 329(8) of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986.
(5)(A) The term ‘‘source reduction’’ means any practice
which—
(i) reduces the amount of any hazardous substance,
pollutant, or contaminant entering any waste stream or
otherwise released into the environment (including fugitive
emissions) prior to recycling, treatment, or disposal; and
(ii) reduces the hazards to public health and the environment associated with the release of such substances,
pollutants, or contaminants.
The term includes equipment or technology modifications, process or procedure modifications, reformulation or redesign of
products, substitution of raw materials, and improvements in
housekeeping, maintenance, training, or inventory control.
(B) The term ‘‘source reduction’’ does not include any practice which alters the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics or the volume of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant through a process or activity which itself is not
integral to and necessary for the production of a product or the
providing of a service.
(6) The term ‘‘multi-media’’ means water, air, and land.
(7) The term ‘‘SIC codes’’ refers to the 2-digit code numbers
used for classification of economic activity in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual.
[42 U.S.C. 13102]
SEC. 6604. EPA ACTIVITIES.
(a) AUTHORITIES.—The

Administrator shall establish in the
Agency an office to carry out the functions of the Administrator
under this subtitle. The office shall be independent of the Agency’s
single-medium program offices but shall have the authority to review and advise such offices on their activities to promote a multimedia approach to source reduction. The office shall be under the
direction of such officer of the Agency as the Administrator shall
designate.
(b) FUNCTIONS.—The Administrator shall develop and implement a strategy to promote source reduction. As part of the strategy, the Administrator shall—
(1) establish standard methods of measurement of source
reduction;
December 31, 2002

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90
181

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

Sec. 6604

(2) ensure that the Agency considers the effect of its existing and proposed programs on source reduction efforts and
shall review regulations of the Agency prior and subsequent to
their proposal to determine their effect on source reduction;
(3) coordinate source reduction activities in each Agency
Office and coordinate with appropriate offices to promote
source reduction practices in other Federal agencies, and generic research and development on techniques and processes
which have broad applicability;
(4) develop improved methods of coordinating, streamlining and assuring public access to data collected under Federal environmental statutes;
(5) facilitate the adoption of source reduction techniques by
businesses. This strategy shall include the use of the Source
Reduction Clearinghouse and State matching grants provided
in this subtitle to foster the exchange of information regarding
source reduction techniques, the dissemination of such information to businesses, and the provision of technical assistance
to businesses. The strategy shall also consider the capabilities
of various businesses to make use of source reduction techniques;
(6) identify, where appropriate, measurable goals which reflect the policy of this subtitle, the tasks necessary to achieve
the goals, dates at which the principal tasks are to be accomplished, required resources, organizational responsibilities, and
the means by which progress in meeting the goals will be
measured;
(8) 1 establish an advisory panel of technical experts comprised of representatives from industry, the States, and public
interest groups, to advise the Administrator on ways to improve collection and dissemination of data;
(9) establish a training program on source reduction opportunities, including workshops and guidance documents, for
State and Federal permit issuance, enforcement, and inspection officials working within all agency program offices. 2
(10) identify and make recommendations to Congress to
eliminate barriers to source reduction including the use of incentives and disincentives;
(11) identify opportunities to use Federal procurement to
encourage source reduction;
(12) develop, test and disseminate model source reduction
auditing procedures designed to highlight source reduction opportunities; and
(13) establish an annual award program to recognize a
company or companies which operate outstanding or innovative source reduction programs.
[42 U.S.C. 13103]

1 So
2 So

December 31, 2002

in law. Section 6604(b) was enacted without a paragraph (7).
in law. The period probably should be a semicolon.

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90
Sec. 6605

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

182

SEC. 6605. GRANTS TO STATES FOR STATE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAMS.
(a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—The Administrator shall make

matching grants to States for programs to promote the use of
source reduction techniques by businesses.
(b) CRITERIA.—When evaluating the requests for grants under
this section, the Administrator shall consider, among other things,
whether the proposed State program would accomplish the following:
(1) Make specific technical assistance available to businesses seeking information about source reduction opportunities, including funding for experts to provide onsite technical
advice to business 1 seeking assistance and to assist in the development of source reduction plans.
(2) Target assistance to businesses for whom lack of information is an impediment to source reduction.
(3) Provide training in source reduction techniques. Such
training may be provided through local engineering schools or
any other appropriate means.
(c) MATCHING FUNDS.—Federal funds used in any State program under this section shall provide no more than 50 per centum
of the funds made available to a State in each year of that State’s
participation in the program.
(d) EFFECTIVENESS.—The Administrator shall establish appropriate means for measuring the effectiveness of the State grants
made under this section in promoting the use of source reduction
techniques by businesses.
(e) INFORMATION.—States receiving grants under this section
shall make information generated under the grants available to the
Administrator.
[42 U.S.C. 13104]
SEC. 6606. SOURCE REDUCTION CLEARINGHOUSE.
(a) AUTHORITY.—The Administrator shall

establish a Source
Reduction Clearinghouse to compile information including a computer data base which contains information on management, technical, and operational approaches to source reduction. The Administrator shall use the clearinghouse to—
(1) serve as a center for source reduction technology transfer;
(2) mount active outreach and education programs by the
States to further the adoption of source reduction technologies;
and
(3) collect and compile information reported by States receiving grants under section 6605 on the operation and success
of State source reduction programs.
(b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The Administrator shall make available to the public such information on source reduction as is gathered pursuant to this subtitle and such other pertinent information
and analysis regarding source reduction as may be available to the
1 So

December 31, 2002

in law. Probably should be ‘‘businesses’’.

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90
183

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

Sec. 6607

Administrator. The data base shall permit entry and retrieval of information to any person.
[42 U.S.C. 13105]
SEC. 6607. SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING DATA COLLECTION.
(a) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Each owner or operator of a

facility required to file an annual toxic chemical release form under
section 313 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
of 1986 (‘‘SARA’’) for any toxic chemical shall include with each
such annual filing a toxic chemical source reduction and recycling
report for the preceeding 1 calendar year. The toxic chemical source
reduction and recycling report shall cover each toxic chemical required to be reported in the annual toxic chemical release form
filed by the owner or operator under section 313(c) of that Act. This
section shall take effect with the annual report filed under section
313 for the first full calendar year beginning after the enactment
of this subtitle.
(b) ITEMS INCLUDED IN REPORT.—The toxic chemical source reduction and recycling report required under subsection (a) shall set
forth each of the following on a facility-by-facility basis for each
toxic chemical:
(1) The quantity of the chemical entering any waste
stream (or otherwise released into the environment) prior to
recycling, treatment, or disposal during the calendar year for
which the report is filed and the percentage change from the
previous year. The quantity reported shall not include any
amount reported under paragraph (7). When actual measurements of the quantity of a toxic chemical entering the waste
streams are not readily available, reasonable estimates should
be made on best engineering judgment.
(2) The amount of the chemical from the facility which is
recycled (at the facility or elsewhere) during such calendar
year, the percentage change from the previous year, and the
process of recycling used.
(3) The source reduction practices used with respect to
that chemical during such year at the facility. Such practices
shall be reported in accordance with the following categories
unless the Administrator finds other categories to be more appropriate.
(A) Equipment, technology, process, or procedure
modifications.
(B) Reformulation or redesign of products.
(C) Substitution of raw materials.
(D) Improvement in management, training, inventory
control, materials handling, or other general operational
phases of industrial facilities.
(4) The amount expected to be reported under paragraph 2
(1) and (2) for the two calendar years immediately following
the calendar year for which the report is filed. Such amount
shall be expressed as a percentage change from the amount reported in paragraphs (1) and (2).
1 So
2 So

December 31, 2002

in law. Probably should be ‘‘preceding’’.
in law. Probably should be ‘‘paragraphs’’.

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90
Sec. 6608

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

184

(5) A ratio of production in the reporting year to production in the previous year. The ratio should be calculated to
most closely reflect all activities involving the toxic chemical.
In specific industrial classifications subject to this section,
where a feedstock or some variable other than production is
the primary influence on waste characteristics or volumes, the
report may provide an index based on that primary variable for
each toxic chemical. The Administrator is encouraged to develop production indexes to accommodate individual industries
for use on a voluntary basis.
(6) The techniques which were used to identify source reduction opportunities. Techniques listed should include, but
are not limited to, employee recommendations, external and internal audits, participative team management, and material
balance audits. Each type of source reduction listed under
paragraph (3) should be associated with the techniques or multiples of techniques used to identify the source reduction technique.
(7) The amount of any toxic chemical released into the environment which resulted from a castatrophic event, remedial
action, or other one-time event, and is not associated with production processess during the reporting year.
(8) The amount of the chemical from the facility which is
treated (at the facility or elsewhere) during such calendar year
and the percentage change from the previous year. For the
first year of reporting under this subsection, comparison with
the previous year is required only to the extent such information is available.
(c) SARA PROVISIONS.—The provisions of sections 322, 325(c),
and 326 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 shall apply to the reporting requirements of this section in
the same manner as to the reports required under section 313 of
that Act. The Administrator may modify the form required for purposes of reporting information under section 313 of that Act to the
extent he deems necessary to include the additional information required under this section.
(d) ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION.—Any person filing a
report under this section for any year may include with the report
additional information regarding source reduction, recycling, and
other pollution control techniques in earlier years.
(e) AVAILABILITY OF DATA.—Subject to section 322 of the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, the Administrator shall make data collected under this section publicly
available in the same manner as the data collected under section
313 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986.
[42 U.S.C. 13107]
SEC. 6608. EPA REPORT.
(a) BIENNIAL REPORTS.—The

Administrator shall provide Congress with a report within eighteen months after enactment of this
subtitle and biennially thereafter, containing a detailed description
of the actions taken to implement the strategy to promote source

December 31, 2002

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90
185

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

Sec. 6608

reduction developed under section 4(b) 1 and the results of such actions. The report shall include an assessment of the effectiveness
of the clearinghouse and grant program established under this subtitle in promoting the goals of the strategy, and shall evaluate data
gaps and data duplication with respect to data collected under Federal environmental statutes.
(b) SUBSEQUENT REPORTS.—Each biennial report submitted
under subsection (a) after the first report shall contain each of the
following:
(1) An analysis of the data collected under section 6607 on
an industry-by-industry basis for not less than five SIC codes
or other categories as the Administrator deems appropriate.
The analysis shall begin with those SIC codes or other categories of facilities which generate the largest quantities of
toxic chemical waste. The analysis shall include an evaluation
of trends in source reduction by industry, firm size, production,
or other useful means. Each such subsequent report shall cover
five SIC codes or other categories which were not covered in
a prior report until all SIC codes or other categories have been
covered.
(2) An analysis of the usefulness and validity of the data
collected under section 6607 for measuring trends in source reduction and the adoption of source reduction by business.
(3) Identification of regulatory and nonregulatory barriers
to source reduction, and of opportunities for using existing regulatory programs, and incentives and disincentives to promote
and assist source reduction.
(4) Identification of industries and pollutants that require
priority assistance in multi-media source reduction 2
(5) Recommendations as to incentives needed to encourage
investment and research and development in source reduction.
(6) Identification of opportunities and development of priorities for research and development in source reduction methods and techniques.
(7) An evaluation of the cost and technical feasibility, by
industry and processes, of source reduction opportunities and
current activities and an identification of any industries for
which there are significant barriers to source reduction with an
analysis of the basis of this identification.
(8) An evaluation of methods of coordinating, streamlining,
and improving public access to data collected under Federal environmental statutes.
(9) An evaluation of data gaps and data duplication with
respect to data collected under Federal environmental statutes.
In the report following the first biennial report provided for under
this subsection, paragraphs (3) through (9) may be included at the
discretion of the Administrator.
[42 U.S.C. 13107]

1 So
2 So

December 31, 2002

in law. Probably should be ‘‘6604(b)’’.
in law. Probably should be followed by a period.

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90
Sec. 6609

POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

186

SEC. 6609. SAVINGS PROVISIONS.

(a) Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed to modify or
interfere with the implementation of title III of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986.
(b) Nothing contained in this subtitle shall be construed, interpreted or applied to supplant, displace, preempt or otherwise diminish the responsibilities and liabilities under other State or Federal law, whether statutory or common.
[42 U.S.C. 13108]
SEC. 6610. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator
$8,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1991, 1992, and 1993 for
functions carried out under this subtitle (other than State Grants),
and $8,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1991, 1992, and 1993,
for grant programs to States issued pursuant to section 6605.
[42 U.S.C. 13109]

December 31, 2002


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleMICROCOMP output file
File Modified2015-03-02
File Created2003-03-04

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy