60-day FRN published

New 60-d FRN published NSDI Champion 2015-22642.pdf

DOUG D. NEBERT NSDI CHAMPION OF THE YEAR AWARD

60-day FRN published

OMB: 1028-0115

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 174 / Wednesday, September 9, 2015 / Notices
improvement of the status of listed
species to the point at which listing is
no longer needed under any criteria
specified in section 4(a)(1) of the Act.
To help guide the recovery effort, we
prepare recovery plans for most listed
species. Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for conservation of
the species, establish criteria for
downlisting or delisting, and estimate
time and cost for implementing recovery
measures. The Act requires the
development of recovery plans for listed
species, unless such a plan would not
promote the conservation of a particular
species.
The Service listed the Mississippi
gopher frog (Rana capito sevosa) under
the Act, as an endangered distinct
vertebrate population segment (DPS) of
the gopher frog (Rana capito) on
December 4, 2001 (66 FR 62993). On
June 12, 2012, we published a final rule
(77 FR 35118) designating critical
habitat for this listed entity, changing its
status to ‘‘species,’’ and changing its
name to dusky gopher frog (Rana
sevosa) based on taxonomic changes
and the acceptance of these changes by
the herpetological scientific community.
The frog’s current distribution is
restricted to the State of Mississippi. At
the time of listing, only one population
of the species was known.
Subsequently, two other naturally
occurring populations were discovered.
One additional dusky gopher frog
population has been established in
Mississippi as a result of translocation
experiments. Presently, we estimate that
a minimum of 135 individual adult
frogs survive in the wild, the vast
majority of which occur in the original
population known at the time of listing.
Principal threats to the dusky gopher
frog include degradation and
destruction of breeding and
nonbreeding habitat, habitat
fragmentation, and alteration of
hydrological patterns due to
urbanization and climate change.
Additional threats include the restricted
range of the dusky gopher frog, its small
number of populations, and disease. All
these factors act to increase the
vulnerability of the species to a single
catastrophic event and to the deleterious
effects of genetic inbreeding.

Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Recovery Plan
Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to
provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and
comment prior to final approval of
recovery plans. We and other Federal
agencies will take these comments into
account in the course of implementing
approved recovery plans.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

14:19 Sep 08, 2015

Jkt 235001

The Technical/Agency Draft Recovery
Plan for the Dusky Gopher Frog was
developed by the Dusky Gopher Frog
Recovery Team and our Mississippi
Field Office. This draft plan was
published on September 10, 2014, and
made available for public comment
through November 10, 2014 (79 FR
53728).
We received public comments on our
draft recovery plan and incorporated
them into the final plan, as appropriate.
We also considered the information we
received from peer reviewers in our
preparation and approval of this final
recovery plan.
Recovery Plan Components
The Service’s recovery objectives are
to work to reduce threats so that the
dusky gopher frog may be downlisted to
threatened status. Defining reasonable
delisting criteria is not possible at this
time, given the current low number of
populations and individuals, lack of
information about the species’ biology,
and magnitude of threats. Therefore,
this recovery plan only establishes
downlisting criteria for the dusky
gopher frog.
Downlisting of the dusky gopher frog
will be considered when:
1. Six viable metapopulations* are
documented within blocks of recovery
focus areas (described in Section II of
the recovery plan) and are widely
distributed across the range of the
species. The six metapopulations would
include a minimum of 12 breeding
ponds and would be distributed as
follows:
a. One metapopulation in Block #1
(Louisiana: Portions of St. Tammany,
Tangipahoa, and Washington Parishes,
west to the Tangipahoa River);
b. Two metapopulations each in Block
#2 (South-Central Mississippi: North of
State Hwy. 26, between the Pearl and
Pascagoula Rivers; Forrest County and
portions of Lamar, Pearl River, Perry,
and Stone Counties) and Block #3
(South Mississippi: South of Hwy. 26,
between the Pearl and Pascagoula
Rivers; Hancock and Harrison Counties,
and portions of Jackson, George, Pearl
River, and Stone Counties); and
c. One metapopulation in either Block
#4 (Eastern Mississippi: East of
Pascagoula/Leaf Rivers; portions of
George, Greene, Jackson, and Wayne
Counties) or Block #5 (Alabama: West of
the Mobile River Delta; Mobile and
Washington Counties, small portion of
Choctaw County).
2. Long-term monitoring (at least 10
years) of each metapopulation is able to
document population viability (viability
standard to be defined through a
recovery task). The 10-year timeframe

PO 00000

Frm 00051

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

54309

will allow monitoring of recruitment
events and other population attributes
in a species that has been characterized
by highly variable reproductive and
survival rates. In each of at least two
annual breeding events within a 3-year
period, a total of 30 egg masses per
metapopulation must be documented
and recruitment must be verified.
3. Breeding and adjacent upland
habitats within the six metapopulations
are protected long term through
management agreements, public
ownership, or other means, in sufficient
quantity and quality (to be determined
by recovery task) to support growing
populations.
4. Studies of the dusky gopher frog’s
biological and ecological requirements
are completed, and any required
recovery measures discovered during
these studies are developed and
implemented.
* Information defining what
constitutes a viable metapopulation can
be found in the Service’s final recovery
plan.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1533 (f).
Dated: July 24, 2015.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2015–22733 Filed 9–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Geological Survey
[GX155EE000101000]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Comments
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of a new information
collection, Doug D. Nebert NSDI
Champion of the Year Award.
AGENCY:

We (the U.S. Geological
Survey) will ask the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve the information collection (IC)
described below. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, and as part of our continuing
efforts to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, we invite the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this IC.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
are considered, we must receive them
on or before November 9, 2015.
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM

09SEN1

54310

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 174 / Wednesday, September 9, 2015 / Notices

You may submit comments
on this information collection to the
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201
Sunrise Valley Drive MS 807, Reston,
VA 20192 (mail); (703) 648–7197 (fax);
or [email protected] (email).
Please reference ‘‘Information Collection
1028—NEW, Doug D. Nebert NSDI
Champion of the Year Award’’ in all
correspondence.

ADDRESSES:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brigitta Urban-Mathieux, Federal
Geographic Data Committee Office of
the Secretariat, U.S. Geological Survey,
at (703) 648–5175 or burbanma@
usgs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

I. Abstract
The Doug D. Nebert NSDI Champion
of the Year Award honors a respected
colleague, technical visionary, and
recognized national leader in the
establishment of spatial data
infrastructures that significantly
enhance the understanding of our
physical and cultural world. The award
is sponsored by the Federal Geographic
Data Committee (FGDC) and its purpose
is to recognize an individual or a team
representing Federal, State, Tribal,
regional, and (or) local government,
academia, or non-profit and professional
organization that has developed an
outstanding, innovative, and operational
tool, application, or service capability
used by multiple organizations that
furthers the vision of the National
Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI).
National nominations are accepted
from the public and private sector
individuals, teams, organizations, and
professional societies. Nomination
packages include three sections: (A)
Cover Sheet, (B) Summary Statement,
and (C) Supplemental Materials. The
cover sheet includes professional
contact information. The Summary
Statement is limited to two pages and
describes the nominee’s achievements
in the development of an outstanding,
innovative, and operational tool,
application, or service capability that
directly supports the spatial data
infrastructures. Nominations may
include up to 10 pages of supplemental
information such as resume,
publications list, and/or letters of
endorsement. The award consists of a
citation and plaque, which are
presented to the recipient at an
appropriate public forum by the FGDC
Chair. The name of the recipient is also
inscribed on a permanent plaque, which
are displayed by the FGDC.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

14:19 Sep 08, 2015

Jkt 235001

II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1028—NEW.
Title: Doug D. Nebert NSDI Champion
of the Year Award.
Type of Request: New information
collection.
Affected Public: Personnel from
Federal, State, Local, and Tribal
governments; Private Sector; Academia;
and Non-profit organizations.
Respondent’s Obligation: None.
Participation is voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: This is an
annual offer.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 10.
Estimated Total Number of Annual
Responses: 10.
Estimated Time per Response: 10
hours.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 100
hours.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’
Burden: None.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor and
you are not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and current expiration date.
III. Request for Comments
We are soliciting comments as to: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the agency
to perform its duties, including whether
the information is useful; (b) the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) how
to minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Please note that the comments
submitted in response to this notice are
a matter of public record. Before
including your personal mailing
address, phone number, email address,
or other personally identifiable
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personally
identifiable information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personally identifiable
information from public view, we

PO 00000

Frm 00052

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Ivan DeLoatch,
Executive Director, Federal Geographic Data
Committee, Core Science Systems.
[FR Doc. 2015–22642 Filed 9–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311–AM–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]

Pueblo of Santa Ana Title 10—
Licensing & Regulation, Chapter 1—
Liquor Code (Chapter)
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

This notice publishes the
amendment to the Pueblo of Santa Ana’s
Title 10—Licensing & Regulation,
Chapter 1—Liquor Code (Chapter). This
Chapter amends the existing Chapter
1—Liquor Code, Section 126, enacted by
the Pueblo of Santa Ana Tribal Council,
which was published in the Federal
Register on April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17903).
DATES: Effective Date: This code shall
become effective on October 9, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Patricia Mattingly, Tribal Government
Services Officer, Southwest Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001
Indian School Road NW., Albuquerque,
NM 87104–2303, Phone: (505) 536–
3100; Fax: (505) 563–3101: or Ms.
Laurel Iron Cloud, Chief, Division of
Tribal Government Services, Office of
Indian Services, Bureau of Indian
Affairs, 1849 C Street NW., MS–4513–
MIB, Washington, DC 20240; Telephone
(202) 513–7641.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Act of August 15, 1953, Public
Law 83–277, 67 Stat. 586, 18 U.S.C.
1161, as interpreted by the Supreme
Court in Rice v. Rehner, 463 U.S. 713
(1983), the Secretary of the Interior shall
certify and publish in the Federal
Register notice of adopted liquor
ordinances for the purpose of regulating
liquor transactions in Indian country.
The Pueblo of Santa Ana Tribal Council
of the Pueblo of Santa Ana adopted the
amendments to the Pueblo’s Title 10—
Licensing & Regulation, Chapter 1—
Liquor Code (Chapter), Section 126, by
Resolution No. 2015–R–09 on June 11,
2015. This Federal Register notice
amends and supersedes the Pueblo of
Santa Ana Liquor Ordinance, enacted by
the Pueblo of Santa Ana Tribal Council,
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM

09SEN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2015-09-09
File Created2015-09-09

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy