1545-1099_supporting_statement_20160518(UPDATED)

1545-1099_supporting_statement_20160518(UPDATED).doc

Form 8811 - Information Return for Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (REMICs) and Issuers of Collateralized Debt Obligations

OMB: 1545-1099

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement

(Form 8811)

OMB # 1545-1099


1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Current regulations require real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs) to provide Forms 1099 to true holders of interests in these investment vehicles. Because of the complex computations required at each level and the potential number of nominees, the ultimate investor may not receive a Form 1099 and other information necessary to prepare a tax return until July or August. Form 8811 collects information for publishing by the IRS so that brokers can contact REMICs to request the financial information and timely issue Form 1099 to holders.


2. USE OF DATA


The form allows the IRS to provide the REMIC industry the information necessary to issue correct information returns to investors.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


Form 8811 cannot be filed electronically, since its relatively low volume does not justify the cost electronic enabling.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


There are no small entities affected by this collection.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


If the IRS did not collect this information, the IRS would not be able to provide the necessary information to issue correct information returns to investors for the

REMIC industry.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Periodic meetings are held between IRS personnel and representatives of the American Bar Association, the National Society of Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and other professional groups to discuss tax law and tax forms. During these meetings, there is an opportunity for those attending to make comments regarding Form 8811.


In response to the Federal Register notice dated July 28, 2015 (80 FR 45018), we received no comments during the comment period regarding Form 8811.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No personally identifiable information (PII) is collected.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Number of Time per Total

Responses Response Hours


Form 8811 1,000 4.38 4,380


Estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown above are not available at this time.


The following regulation imposes no additional burden. Please continue to assign OMB number 1545-1099 to this regulation.


1.6049-7




13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


There are no start-up costs associated with this collection.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


The primary cost to the government consists of the cost of printing this form. We estimate that the cost of printing the form is $400.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


This request is for the reinstatement of an expired information collection. There is no actual change in burden.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTION TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



File Typeapplication/msword
File Title#1545-1099 supporting statement
AuthorInternal Revenue Service
Last Modified ByDepartment of Treasury
File Modified2016-05-23
File Created2016-05-23

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy