Supporting Statement

Supporting Statement.doc

Application of Section 338 to Insurance Companies

OMB: 1545-1990

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement

Application of Section 338 to Insurance Companies

OMB No. 1545-1990



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


These regulations apply to a deemed sale or acquisition of an insurance company’s assets pursuant to an election under section 338 of the Internal Revenue Code, to a sale or acquisition of an insurance trade or business subject to section 1060, and to the acquisition of insurance contracts through assumption reinsurance; regulations under section 381 concerning the effect of certain corporate liquidations and reorganizations on certain tax attributes of insurance companies, and regulations under section 197 relating to the determination of adjusted basis of amortizable section 197 intangibles with respect to insurance contracts, section 338 relating to increases in reserves after a deemed asset sale and sections 338 and 846 relating to the effect of a section 338 election on a section 846(e) election.


  1. USE OF DATA


This information is required by the IRS to allow an insurance company permission to cease using its historical loss payment pattern and to allow parties to a transaction under section 338, to an applicable asset acquisition under section 1060, or to a distribution or reorganization to which section 381 applies to file a retroactive election to apply these regulations to transactions completed before the effective dates of these regulations. These recordkeeping requirements apply to insurance companies.


  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


We have no plans to offer electronic filing because of low filing volume compared to cost of electronic enabling.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


The collection of information will not burden small businesses or other small entities.







  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR PLOICY ACTIVITIES


If the IRS did not collect this information, the taxpayer and the IRS would not have the information to determine the effect of the section 338 election on insurance company targets. This would ultimately affect the revenue needed to support the Federal government.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. COLLECTION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


A notice of proposed rulemaking, REG-146384-05 (71 FR 18053), was published simultaneously with final and temporary regulations (71 FR 17990), as TD 9257, on

April 10, 2012, which provided the public a 60-day period in which to review and provide public comments relating to any aspect of the regulation. No written comments were received. A final regulation and removal of temporary regulations was published in the Federal Register on January 23, 2008 (73 FR 3868) as TD 9377.


In response to the Federal Register notice (80 FR 44423), dated July 27, 2015 we received no comments during the comment period regarding REG-146384-05 (T.D. 9257; 9377).


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Business Master File (BMF)” system and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for this system under IRS 24.046-Customer Account Data Engine Business Master File.  The Internal Revenue Service PIAs can be found at http://www.irs.gov/uac/Privacy-Impact-Assessments-PIA.


Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems. .


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


The collection of information is in §§1.338-11(e)(2), 1.338(i)-1(c), 1.381(c)(22)-1(c) and 1.1060-1(a)(2) of the regulations. The collection of information in these final regulations will allow an insurance company permission to cease using its historical loss payment pattern and to allow parties to a transaction under section 338, to an applicable asset acquisition under section 1060, or to a distribution or reorganization to which section 381 applies to file a retroactive election to apply these regulations to transactions completed before the effective dates of these regulations.


# Respondents

# Responses Per Respondent

Annual Responses

Hours Per Response

Total Burden

12

1

12

1

12


  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice, dated July 27, 2015, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


We estimate that there are no annualized costs to the federal government.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTION TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



Note: the following paragraph applies to all of the information collections in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

4

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleThe collection of information in these final regulations was not proposed in the preceding notice of proposed rulemaking
AuthorWeiss Mark J
Last Modified ByDepartment of Treasury
File Modified2015-11-12
File Created2015-06-29

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy