Evaluation of Correct Child Restraint System Installation

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Form NHTSA Form 1302 Evaluation of Correct Child Restraint System Installation Form	New
Eval of CRS Install Sec A Final.docx Supporting Statement A	2015-12-18
Eval of CRS Install Sec B Final.docx Supporting Statement B	2015-12-18
Eval of CRS Install App C IRB Approval.docx Supplementary Document	2015-12-17
Eval of CRS Install App B2 30-day notice.pdf Supplementary Document	2015-12-17
Eval of CRS Install App B1 60-day notice.pdf Supplementary Document	2015-12-17
Eval of CRS Install App I Post Explanation.docx Supplementary Document	2015-12-17
Eval of CRS Install App H Pre Explanation.docx Supplementary Document	2015-12-17
Eval of CRS Install App A Authority.docx Supplementary Document	2015-12-17

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
219314	Evaluation of Correct Child Restraint System Installation Form	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2127-0721	ICR Reference No: 201512-2127-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: DOT/NHTSA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Evaluation of Correct Child Restraint System Installation
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 01/17/2017
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/25/2016
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	01/31/2020	36 Months From Approved
Responses	300	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	473	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: On average, three children were killed and an estimated 470 children were injured every day in the United States in traffic crashes. Of the 1,149 traffic fatalities involving children 14 and younger in 2013, 776 or roughly two-thirds were occupants of passenger vehicles. Of these 776 fatalities, restraint use was known for 719, of whom 412 or 57% were restrained by child restraints or seat belts. To better understand child restraint use, approval is requested to conduct a study to identify user errors related to: the selection of Child Restraint Systems (CRS) based on a child’s height/weight/age, installation of the selected CRS in various vehicle make and models, and securing the child in the CRS. In addition to the user’s knowledge of and experience with various CRSs, specific features or designs of the vehicles and CRSs as well as their respective manuals may contribute to various types of errors. The proposed study attempts to identify the various user errors and provide insight into the causal factors that contribute to errors related to selecting CRSs and properly securing children in them, with both novice and experienced users. Findings will provide useful information to the public regarding error-prone factors related to selecting the right CRS and installing the CRS. In addition, the findings will transition to efforts in reducing or removing error-prone factors from the CRS selection and installation processes.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 49 USC 301, 30168 Name of Law: Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	80 FR 3008	01/21/2015
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	80 FR 23850	04/29/2015
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Evaluation of Correct Child Restraint System Installation	NHTSA Form 1302, NHTSA Form 1303, NHTSA Form 1304, NHTSA Form 1326	Informed Consent ,   Recruitment Screener ,   Pre-Install Questionnaire ,   Post-Install Questionnaire

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	300	0	0	300	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	473	0	0	473	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This study will result in a program change of adding 473 hours of NHTSA overall burden hours.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $164,665

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/25/2016

---