|
2013 SUBMISSION |
CURRENT REQUEST |
|
CHANGE IN BURDEN ESTIMATES |
|
|
Enclosure |
Requirement |
Respondents |
Responses per Respondent |
Total Responses |
Burden Per Response |
Burden |
Requirement |
Respondents |
Responses per Respondent |
Total Responses |
Burden Per Response |
Burden |
Cost at $279/hr |
Respondents |
Responses per Respondent |
Total Responses |
Burden Per Response |
Burden |
Comments |
|
Enclosures 1 – 5 |
Confirmation of Receipt |
110.0 |
1.0 |
110.0 |
2.6 |
286.0 |
Confirmation of Receipt |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(110.0) |
(1.0) |
(110.0) |
(2.6) |
(286.0) |
|
|
Enclosures 1 – 5 |
Response indicating inability to comply with information request |
110.0 |
1.0 |
110.0 |
40.0 |
4,400.0 |
Response indicating inability to comply with information request |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(110.0) |
(1.0) |
(110.0) |
(40.0) |
(4,400.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
Submit risk assessment approach or confirm use of generic approach |
106.0 |
1.0 |
106.0 |
170.0 |
18,020.0 |
Submit risk assessment approach or confirm use of generic approach |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(106.0) |
(1.0) |
(106.0) |
(170.0) |
(18,020.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
Submit hazard reevaluation (seismic), Central and Eastern US (CSUS) |
98.0 |
1.0 |
98.0 |
1,420.0 |
139,160.0 |
Submit hazard reevaluation (seismic), Central and Eastern US (CEUS) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(98.0) |
(1.0) |
(98.0) |
(1,420.0) |
(139,160.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
Submit hazard reevaluation (seismic), Western US (WUS) |
8.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
2,850.0 |
22,800.0 |
Submit hazard reevaluation (seismic), Western US (WUS) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(8.0) |
(1.0) |
(8.0) |
(2,850.0) |
(22,800.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
Submit seismic risk assessment, high priority plants conducing SPRA |
27.0 |
1.0 |
27.0 |
11,000.0 |
297,000.0 |
Submit seismic risk assessment, high priority plants conducting SPRA |
36.0 |
1.0 |
36.0 |
5,500.0 |
198,000.0 |
$55,242,000 |
9.0 |
- |
9.0 |
(5,500.0) |
(99,000.0) |
Number of SPRAs reflects the lastest estimate of expected submittials |
|
Submit seismic risk assessment, high priority plants conducing SMA |
10.0 |
1.0 |
10.0 |
1,750.0 |
17,500.0 |
Submit seismic risk assessment, high priority plants conducting SMA |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(10.0) |
(1.0) |
(10.0) |
(1,750.0) |
(17,500.0) |
No SMA submittals are anticipated |
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
Submit seismic risk assessment conducting SMA |
43.0 |
1.0 |
43.0 |
1,400.0 |
60,200.0 |
Submit seismic risk assessment conducting SMA |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(43.0) |
(1.0) |
(43.0) |
(1,400.0) |
(60,200.0) |
No SMA submittals are anticipated |
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submit seismic high and low frequency confirmations. |
43.0 |
1.0 |
43.0 |
200.0 |
8,600.0 |
$2,399,400 |
43.0 |
1.0 |
43.0 |
200.0 |
8,600.0 |
|
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submit seismic low frequency confirmations. |
2.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
200.0 |
400.0 |
$111,600 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
200.0 |
400.0 |
|
|
Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submit seismic spent fuel pool evaluation |
66.0 |
1.0 |
66.0 |
200.0 |
13,200.0 |
$3,682,800 |
66.0 |
1.0 |
66.0 |
200.0 |
13,200.0 |
|
|
Enclosure 2: Recommendation 2.1 Flooding Reevaluation |
Submit integrated assessment approach or confirm use of generic approach |
106.0 |
1.0 |
106.0 |
170.0 |
18,020.0 |
Submit integrated assessment approach or confirm use of generic approach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106.0) |
(1.0) |
(106.0) |
(170.0) |
(18,020.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 2: Recommendation 2.1 Flooding Reevaluation |
Submit hazard reevaluation (flooding) |
106.0 |
1.0 |
106.0 |
1,520.0 |
161,120.0 |
Submit hazard reevaluation (flooding) |
8.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
1,520.0 |
12,160.0 |
$3,392,640 |
(98.0) |
- |
(98.0) |
- |
(148,960.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 2: Recommendation 2.1 Flooding Reevaluation |
Submit integrated assessment for flooding hazards |
106.0 |
1.0 |
106.0 |
2,350.0 |
249,100.0 |
Submit integrated assessment for flooding hazards |
20.0 |
1.0 |
20.0 |
2,645.0 |
52,900.0 |
$14,759,100 |
(86.0) |
- |
(86.0) |
295.0 |
(196,200.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 2: Recommendation 2.1 Flooding Reevaluation |
Submit Focused evaluation of Local Intense Precipitation Hazard and Available Physical Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
Submit focused evaluation of Local Intense Precipitation Hazard and Available Physical Margin |
58.0 |
1.0 |
58.0 |
500.0 |
29,000.0 |
$8,091,000 |
58.0 |
1.0 |
58.0 |
500.0 |
29,000.0 |
A Focused evaluation is an alternative approach to the integrated assessment for sites whose sole exceedance of the design basis comes from a local intenses precipitation event or have available physical margin to mitigate the effects of other hazards |
|
Enclosure 3: Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Walkdowns |
Submit seismic walkdown procedures or confirm use of NRC-endorsed procedures |
104.0 |
1.0 |
104.0 |
200.0 |
20,800.0 |
Submit seismic walkdown procedures or confirm use of NRC-endorsed procedures |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(104.0) |
(1.0) |
(104.0) |
(200.0) |
(20,800.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 3: Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Walkdowns |
Submit seismic walkdown final report |
104.0 |
1.0 |
104.0 |
1,800.0 |
187,200.0 |
Submit seismic walkdown final report |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(104.0) |
(1.0) |
(104.0) |
(1,800.0) |
(187,200.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 4: Recommendation 2.3: Flooding Walkdowns |
Submit flooding walkdown procedures or confirm use of NRC-endorsed procedures |
104.0 |
1.0 |
104.0 |
260.0 |
27,040.0 |
Submit flooding walkdown procedures or confirm use of NRC-endorsed procedures |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(104.0) |
(1.0) |
(104.0) |
(260.0) |
(27,040.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 4: Recommendation 2.3: Flooding Walkdowns |
Submit flooding walkdown final report |
104.0 |
1.0 |
104.0 |
2,340.0 |
243,360.0 |
Submit flooding walkdown final report |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(104.0) |
(1.0) |
(104.0) |
(2,340.0) |
(243,360.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 5: Recommendation 9.3: Emergency Preparedness |
Submit communications analysis |
110.0 |
1.0 |
110.0 |
250.0 |
27,500.0 |
Submit communications analysis |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(110.0) |
(1.0) |
(110.0) |
(250.0) |
(27,500.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 5: Recommendation 9.3: Emergency Preparedness |
Submit initial staffing analysis |
110.0 |
1.0 |
110.0 |
125.0 |
13,750.0 |
Submit initial staffing analysis |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$0 |
(110.0) |
(1.0) |
(110.0) |
(125.0) |
(13,750.0) |
|
|
Enclosure 5: Recommendation 9.3: Emergency Preparedness |
Submit final staffing analysis |
110.0 |
1.0 |
110.0 |
125.0 |
13,750.0 |
Submit final staffing analysis |
5.0 |
1.0 |
5.0 |
125.0 |
625.0 |
$174,375 |
(105.0) |
- |
(105.0) |
- |
(13,125.0) |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
110.0 |
|
1,576.0 |
|
1,521,006.0 |
|
104.0 |
|
238.0 |
|
314,885.0 |
$87,852,915 |
(6.0) |
- |
(1,338.0) |
- |
(1,206,121.0) |
|
|
ANNUALIZED TOTAL |
|
110.0 |
|
525.3 |
|
507,002.0 |
|
104.0 |
|
79.3 |
|
104,961.7 |
$29,284,305 |
(6.0) |
|
(446.0) |
|
(402,040.3) |
|
|