Oct. 19, 2015, Federal Register Notice (60-Day)

63272

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 201 / Monday, October 19, 2015 / Notices

17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 11 and is
reasonably designed to meet the margin,
financial resource and governance
requirements of Rules 17Ad–22(b)(2),
(b)(3) and (d)(8).12
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of
Section 17A of the Act 13 and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,14 that the
proposed rule change (SR–ICEEU–2015–
010), as modified by Amendment No. 1
thereto be, and hereby is, approved.15
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–26423 Filed 10–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #14494 Disaster #ZZ–
00011]

The Entire United States and U.S.
Territories
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

This is a notice of the Military
Reservist Economic Injury Disaster Loan
Program (MREIDL), dated 10/01/2015.
Effective Date: 10/01/2015.
MREIDL Loan Application Deadline
Date: 1 year after the essential employee
is discharged or released from active
duty.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration Processing And
Disbursement Center 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington,
DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of Public
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

11 15

U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
CFR 240.17Ad(22)(b)(2), (b)(3) and (d)(8).
13 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
15 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposed rule change’s
impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
12 17

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:52 Oct 16, 2015

Jkt 238001

Law 106–50, the Veterans
entrepreneurship and Small Business
Development Act of 1999, and the
Military Reservist and Veteran Small
Business Reauthorization Act of 2008,
this notice establishes the application
filing period for the Military Reservist
Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program
(MREIDL).
Effective 10/01/2015, small
businesses employing military reservists
may apply for economic injury disaster
loans if those employees are called up
to active duty during a period of
military conflict or have received notice
of an expected call-up, and those
employees are essential to the success of
the small business daily operations.
The purpose of the MREIDL program
is to provide funds to an eligible small
business to meet its ordinary and
necessary operating expenses that it
could have met, but is unable to meet,
because an essential employee was
called-up or expects to be called-up to
active duty in his or her role as a
military reservist. These loans are
intended only to provide the amount of
working capital needed by a small
business to pay its necessary obligations
as they mature until operations return to
normal after the essential employee is
released from active duty. For
information/applications contact 1–
800–659–2955 or visit www.sba.gov.
Applications for the Military Reservist
Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program
may be filed at the above address.
The Interest Rate for eligible small
businesses is 4.000.
The number assigned is 14494 0.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015–26043 Filed 10–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement;
Manatee and Hillsborough Counties,
Florida
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:

The FHWA is issuing this
notice of cancellation to advise the
public that we are no longer preparing
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the proposed Port Manatee
Connector in Manatee and Hillsborough

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00080

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Counties, Florida. This is formal
cancellation of the Notice of Intent that
was published in the Federal Register
on March 5, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cathy Kendall, Senior Environmental
Specialist, Federal Highway
Administration, 3500 Financial Plaza,
Suite 400, Tallahassee, Florida 32312;
Telephone: (850) 553–2225.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS was
to improve access between Port Manatee
and Interstate 75 (I–75). The Notice of
Intent to prepare an EIS is rescinded.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Research,
Planning and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Cathy Kendall,
Senior Environmental Specialist, Tallahassee,
Florida.
[FR Doc. 2015–26443 Filed 10–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA 2015–0007–N–26]

Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
its implementing regulations, the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking an
extension of the following currently
approved information collection
activities. On May 7, 2014, the Secretary
of Transportation issued Emergency
Order (EO) Docket No. DOT–OST–
2014–0067 requiring affected railroad
carriers to provide certain information
to the State Emergency Response
Commissions (SERCs) for each State in
which their trains carrying 1 million
gallons or more of Bakken crude oil
travel. The information collection
activities associated with the Secretary’s
Emergency Order originally received a
six-month emergency approval from
OMB on May 10, 2014. On July 10,
2015, OMB again approved the
information collection activities
associated with the Secretary’s
Emergency Order until March 31, 2016.
FRA is now requesting to continue these

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM

19OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 201 / Monday, October 19, 2015 / Notices
information collection activities until
the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA)
finalizes the Oil Spill Response
Proposed Rule that it is currently
working on and that will codify the
requirements of the Secretary’s
Emergency Order. The Secretary’s EO
remains in full force and effect until that
happens. FRA also hereby announces
that it is seeking renewal of the
additional currently approved
information collection activities
described below for the maximum time
period (3 years). Before submitting these
information collection requirements for
clearance by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting
public comment on specific aspects of
the activities identified below.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than December 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on any or all of the following proposed
activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert
Brogan, Information Clearance Officer,
Office of Safety, Regulatory Safety
Analysis Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 17,
Washington, DC 20590, or Ms. Kimberly
Toone, Information Clearance Officer,
Office of Information Technology, RAD–
20, Federal Railroad Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590. Commenters
requesting FRA to acknowledge receipt
of their respective comments must
include a self-addressed stamped
postcard stating, ‘‘Comments on OMB
control number 2130 -lll.’’
Alternatively, comments may be
transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493–
6216 or (202) 493–6497, or via email to
Mr. Brogan at [email protected], or
to Ms. Toone at [email protected].
Please refer to the assigned OMB control
number in any correspondence
submitted. FRA will summarize
comments received in response to this
notice in a subsequent notice and
include them in its information
collection submission to OMB for
approval.
Mr.
Robert Brogan, Information Clearance
Officer, Office of Safety, Regulatory
Safety Analysis Division, RRS–21,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 17,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)
493–6292) or Ms. Kimberly Toone,
Information Clearance Officer, Office of
Information Technology, RAD–20,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:52 Oct 16, 2015

Jkt 238001

493–6132). (These telephone numbers
are not toll-free.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13, sec. 2, 109
Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to
provide 60-days notice to the public for
comment on information collection
activities before seeking approval for
reinstatement or renewal by OMB. 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1),
1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically,
FRA invites interested respondents to
comment on the following summaries of
proposed information collection
activities regarding: (i) Whether the
information collection activities are
necessary for FRA to properly execute
its functions, including whether the
activities will have practical utility; (ii)
the accuracy of FRA’s estimates of the
burden of the information collection
activities, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to
determine the estimates; (iii) ways for
FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information being
collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to
minimize the burden of information
collection activities on the public by
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)(i)–(iv); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1)(i)–(iv). FRA believes that
soliciting public comment will promote
its efforts to reduce the administrative
and paperwork burdens associated with
the collection of information mandated
by Federal regulations. In summary,
FRA reasons that comments received
will advance three objectives: (i) Reduce
reporting burdens; (ii) ensure that it
organizes information collection
requirements in a ‘‘user friendly’’ format
to improve the use of such information;
and (iii) accurately assess the resources
expended to retrieve and produce
information requested. See 44 U.S.C.
3501.
Below are brief summaries of three
currently approved information
collection requests that FRA will submit
for clearance by OMB as required under
the PRA:
Title: Secretary of Transportation
Emergency Order Docket No. DOT–
OST–2014–0067.
OMB Control Number: 2130–0604.
Abstract: As noted in the summary
above, on May 7, 2014, the Secretary of
Transportation issued Emergency Order
(EO) Docket No. DOT–OST–2014–0067

PO 00000

Frm 00081

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

63273

requiring affected railroad carriers to
provide certain information to the State
Emergency Response Commissions
(SERCs) for each State in which their
trains carrying 1 million gallons or more
of Bakken crude oil travel. This EO is
available through the Department’s
public docket system at
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
DOT–OST–2014–0067. The EO took
effect immediately upon issuance,
although affected railroads were
permitted 30 days to provide the
required information to the SERCs. The
EO is the Department’s direct and
proactive response to a recent series of
train accidents involving the
transportation of petroleum crude oil, a
hazardous material the transportation of
which is regulated by the Department.
The most recent accident occurred on
April 30, 2014, when a train
transporting petroleum crude oil
derailed in Lynchburg, Virginia and
released approximately 30,000 gallons
of its contents into the James River.
Further, the EO explains that, with the
rising demand for rail transportation of
petroleum crude oil throughout the
United States, the risk of rail incidents
has increased commensurate with the
increase in the volume of the material
shipped and that there have been
several significant derailments in both
the U.S. and Canada over the last
several months causing deaths and
property and environmental damage
that involved petroleum crude oil. DOT
emergency orders are rare and the EO
itself describes the most recent
accidents and circumstances leading the
agency to issue the EO. The collection
of information included under this EO
is aimed at ensuring that railroads that
transport in a single train a large
quantity of petroleum crude oil (1
million gallons or more), particularly
crude oil from the Bakken shale
formation in the Williston Basin,
provide certain information to the
relevant SERCs in each State in which
the railroad operates such trains.
Ensuring that railroads provide this
information to SERCs is critical to
ensuring that local and State emergency
responders are aware of the large
quantities of crude oil that are being
transported through their jurisdictions
and are prepared to respond to
accidents involving such trains should
they occur.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Affected Public: Businesses.
Frequency of Submission: One-time;
on occasion.
Respondent Universe: 47 Railroad
Carriers; 50 State Emergency Response
Commissions (SERCs).
Reporting Burden:

E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM

19OCN1

63274

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 201 / Monday, October 19, 2015 / Notices
Emergency order
item No.

Respondent
universe

Total annual responses

Average time
per response

(1) RR Notification to SERCs ............................................
(2) Updated RR Notification to SERCs .............................

47 railroads ......
47 railroads ......

30 hours ...........
4 hours .............

3,600
100

(3) Notification Copies to FRA ..........................................
(4) Requests to RRs by SERCs for Information from
Local Emergency Response Agencies Regarding the
Volume and Frequency of Train Traffic Implicated by
this Emergency Order within that Agency’s Jurisdiction
and RR Responses.
(5) Petitions to the Secretary/FRA Administrator for Relief from This Emergency Order.

47 railroads ......
47 railroads ......

120 written notifications .........
25 updated written notifications.
20 notification copies .............
30 informational assistance
requests + 30 informational
responses.

10 minutes ........
30 minutes ........

5
60

2 hours .............

8

Total Estimated Responses: 229.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
3,773 hours.
Status: Extension of a currently
approved information collection.
Title: Ballast Defects and Conditions–
Importance of Identification and Repair
in Preventing Development of Unsafe
Combinations of Track Conditions.
OMB Control Number: 2130–0614.
Abstract: FRA issued Safety Advisory
2015–04 on August 20, 2015, to
emphasize the importance of timely
repairing ballast defects and conditions
on main tracks. FRA published Safety
Advisory 2015–04 in the Federal
Register on August 26, 2015. See 80 FR
51868. In the Safety Advisory, FRA
noted that ballast defects and ballast
conditions that are not repaired in a
timely manner can lead to future
defects. FRA believes it is important for
track inspectors to be aware that ballast

47 railroads ......

defects and conditions can cause track
components to deteriorate rapidly and
compromise the stability of the track
structure, and that inspectors are trained
to identify and repair ballast defects and
conditions. This safety advisory
recommends that track owners and
railroads: (1) Assess current engineering
instructions on ballast safety and update
them to provide specific guidance to
track inspectors (designated personnel
that are qualified to inspect and repair
track) on how to identify and initiate
remedial action under 49 CFR
213.233(d) for ballast defects and
conditions, as well as on the appropriate
remedial action to implement,
particularly in areas with one or more
additional track conditions; (2) train
track inspectors on the updated
engineering instructions and this safety
advisory to ensure they understand how
to identify and initiate remedial action
Respondent
universe

Safety advisory 2015–04

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

(1) RR Assessment and Update of Engineering Instruc- 754 Railroads ...
tions to provide Guidance to Its Track Inspectors on
How to Identify and Repair Ballast Defects and Other
Ballast Conditions.
(2) RR Training of Its Track Inspectors on Updated Engi- 754 Railroads ...
neering Instructions and FRA Safety Advisory 2015–04.

Form Number(s): N/A.
Respondent Universe: 754 Railroads.
Frequency of Submission: One-time;
on occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
10,200.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
10,200 hours.
Status: Regular Review.
Title: Disqualification Proceedings.
OMB Control Number: 2130–0529.
Abstract: Under 49 U.S.C. 20111(c),
FRA is authorized to issue orders
disqualifying railroad employees,
including supervisors, managers, and
other agents, from performing safetysensitive service in the rail industry for
violations of safety rules, regulations,
standards, orders, or laws evidencing

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:52 Oct 16, 2015

Jkt 238001

4 relief petitions .....................

Frm 00082

Fmt 4703

for ballast defects and conditions in a
timely manner, and understand the
importance of such remedial action in
preventing the development of unsafe
combinations of track conditions; and
(3) ensure that supervisors provide
adequate oversight of track inspectors to
achieve identification and remediation
of ballast defects and other track
conditions.
FRA is seeking regular Clearance of
this information collection request that
was previously approved under
Emergency Processing procedures on
September 9, 2015.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Affected Public: Businesses.
Frequency of Submission: One-time;
on occasion.
Respondent Universe: 754 Track
owners/Railroads.
Reporting Burden:

Total annual responses

Average time
per response

100 assessments + 100 engineering instruction updates.

60 minutes ........

200

10,000 trained track inspectors/records.

60 minutes ........

10,000

unfitness. FRA’s regulations, 49 CFR
part 209, subpart D, implement the
statutory provision by requiring (i) a
railroad employing or formerly
employing a disqualified individual to
disclose the terms and conditions of a
disqualification order to the individual’s
new or prospective employing railroad;
(ii) a railroad considering employing an
individual in a safety-sensitive position
to ask the individual’s previous
employing railroad whether the
individual is currently serving under a
disqualification order; and (iii) a
disqualified individual to inform his
new or prospective employer of the
disqualification order and provide a
copy of the same. Additionally, the
regulations prohibit a railroad from

PO 00000

Total annual
burden hours

Sfmt 4703

Total annual
burden hours

employing a person serving under a
disqualification order to work in a
safety-sensitive position. This
information serves to inform a railroad
whether an employee or prospective
employee is currently disqualified from
performing safety-sensitive service
based on the issuance of a
disqualification order by FRA.
Furthermore, it prevents an individual
currently serving under a
disqualification order from retaining
and obtaining employment in a safetysensitive position in the rail industry.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Affected Public: Railroad Employees.
Respondent Universe: 40,000
Locomotive Engineers.
Total Responses: 3.

E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM

19OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 201 / Monday, October 19, 2015 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 5
hours.
Status: Extension of a currently
approved collection.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5
CFR 1320.5(b), 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA
informs all interested parties that it may
not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Issued in Washington, DC on October 13,
2015.
Corey Hill,
Acting Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–26409 Filed 10–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0135; Notice 2]

General Motors, LLC, Denial of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Denial of Petition.
AGENCY:

General Motors, LLC (GM) has
determined that certain model year
(MY) 2013–2014 Chevrolet Express,
GMC Savana, Chevrolet Silverado HD
and GMC Sierra HD compressed natural
gas (CNG) multipurpose passenger
vehicles (MPVs) and trucks
manufactured between May 20, 2012,
and September 25, 2013, do not comply
with the lettering height requirement in
paragraph S5.3 of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) FMVSS No.
303, Fuel System Integrity of
Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles. GM
has filed an appropriate report dated
November 25, 2013, pursuant to 49 CFR
part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
ADDRESSES: For further information on
this decision, contact Mr. Ed Chan,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, at
the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) by telephone
at (202) 493–0335.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. GM’s Petition: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
GM submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:52 Oct 16, 2015

Jkt 238001

noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
The agency published a notice of
receipt of the petition, with a 30-day
public comment period, on March 11,
2014 in the Federal Register (79 FR
13735). No comments were received. To
view the petition, and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Web site
at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2013–
0135.’’
II. Vehicles Involved: Affected are
approximately 2,247 MY 2013–2014
Chevrolet Express, GMC Savana,
Chevrolet Silverado HD and GMC Sierra
HD compressed natural gas (CNG) MPVs
and trucks manufactured between May
20, 2012, and September 25, 2013.
III. Noncompliance: GM explains that
the noncompliance is an error on the
vehicle CNG labels. Specifically, the
lettering height on the labels is 2.5 mm,
instead of the minimum 4.76 mm, as
required by paragraph S5.3 of FMVSS
No. 303.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.3 of
FMVSS No. 303 requires:
S5.3 Each CNG vehicle shall be
permanently labeled, near the vehicle
refueling connection, with the
information specified in S5.3.1 and
S5.3.2 of this section. The information
shall be visible to a person standing
next to the vehicle during refueling, in
English, and in letters and numbers that
are not less than 4.76 mm (3⁄16 inch)
high.
S5.3.1 The statement: ‘‘Service
pressure __kPa (__psig).’’
S5.3.2 The statement ‘‘See
instructions on fuel container for
inspection and service life.’’
V. Summary of GM’s Analyses: GM
stated its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
A. The information on the subject
CNG labels is correct and entirely
legible.
Paragraph S5.4 of FMVSS No. 303
requires that the information required
for the label also be included in the
owner’s manual using ‘‘. . . not less
than 10 point type.’’ The 2.5 mm
lettering height on the subject labels is
10 point type, i.e., the same lettering
size as what is specified for the owner’s
manual content. The 10 point type that
is legible for purposes of the owner’s
manual is also legible on the labels
installed at the CNG filler port.
B. The subject CNG label is an
‘‘information’’ label, not a ‘‘warning’’
label.

PO 00000

Frm 00083

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

63275

The subject label is not a ‘‘warning’’
label and does not warn the user of a
safety related risk or consequence. Even
if the user does not read the label
information due to the font size, the
user will not miss information about a
safety risk.
C. The label font size does not create
a risk of misfueling.
Even if the user fails to read the
information label due to the reduced
font size, there would be no adverse
safety consequence. The service
pressure of the subject CNG tanks is
3,600 psi. There is no risk of overpressuring these tanks since CNG filling
stations are required to shutoff at 3,600
psi, per ANSI/IAS NGV 4.2–1999 CSA
12.52–M99(R09). Accordingly, there is
no risk of a fuel leak.
Even if the shutoff function on a
filling station were to malfunction, all
CNG tanks on the affected vehicles are
equipped with pressure-relief devices
designed to deploy at 5,400 psi, which
is below the burst pressure of the tank
itself.
With regard to under-pressure (underfill) potential, all affected vehicles are
equipped with a CNG fuel gauge in the
instrument cluster to inform the driver
of the fuel level. While some drivers
may estimate the driving range
associated with a full fill, most drivers
typically rely on fuel gauges, not
anticipated range, to determine when to
refuel. Some CNG filling stations,
primarily in Canada, are designed to
shutoff at 3,000 psi, which is below the
3,600 psi service pressure of the affected
CNG tanks. However, regardless of
whether the CNG tanks on the affected
vehicles start out full (3,600 psi) or 83%
full (3,000 psi), the driver has ample
opportunity to monitor the fuel gauge
and refuel prior to the CNG being
depleted. Additionally, the owner
manual instructs that ‘‘the fuel gauge
has been calibrated to display full at
approximately 24,800 kPa (3,600 psi)
. . .’’
Finally, there is no risk that a
customer would attempt to fuel the CNG
tanks from a conventional gasoline
pump. The fueling nozzle and filling
port for CNG are completely distinct
from the corresponding nozzle and port
used for gasoline, and the distinctions
are obvious. In the extraordinary event
that a user attempted to connect a
conventional gasoline nozzle to the CNG
fueling valve, it would be immediately
apparent that the mismatched gasoline
nozzle does not attach to or work with
the CNG valve. GM also asserts that
owners and operators of CNG vehicles
(the large majority being fleet
purchasers) are well aware that their
vehicles use a non-conventional fuel,

E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM

19OCN1