Next Page | ||||||||||||
OMB Control Number: TKTK-TKTK | ||||||||||||
Expiration Date: Month/Date/Year | ||||||||||||
DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE ASSESSMENT: THE U.S. INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY | ||||||||||||
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT | ||||||||||||
The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Technology Evaluation (OTE), is conducting a survey and assessment of the health and competitiveness of the U.S. design and manufacturing infrastructure available for producing Integrated Circuit products required for meeting U.S. national security needs. The goal of this study is to provide decision makers in the U.S. Departments of Defense, Energy, Justice, Homeland Security, and other Executive Branch agencies with detailed information on (1) the health and status of Integrated Circuit design and manufacturing capabilities remaining in the United States; and (2) the outlook for maintaining these activities in the future. The scope of this effort encompasses Integrated Circuit design and manufacturing resources, including the supply chain. | ||||||||||||
RESPONSE TO THIS SURVEY IS REQUIRED BY LAW | ||||||||||||
A response to this survey is required by law (50 U.S.C. App. Sec. 2155). Failure to respond can result in a maximum fine of $10,000, imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Information furnished herewith is deemed confidential and will not be published or disclosed except in accordance with Section 705 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C App. Sec. 2155). Section 705 prohibits the publication or disclosure of this information unless the President determines that its withholding is contrary to the national defense. Information will not be shared with any non-government entity, other than in aggregate form. The information will be protected pursuant to the appropriate exemptions from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), should it be the subject of a FOIA request. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. |
||||||||||||
BURDEN ESTIMATE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENT | ||||||||||||
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 14 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information to BIS Information Collection Officer, Room 6883, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (OMB Control No. TKTK-TKTK), Washington, D.C. 20503. | ||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act | ||||||||||||
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||
Table of Contents | |||||||
I | Cover Page | ||||||
II | Table of Contents | ||||||
III | General Instructions | ||||||
IV | Definitions | ||||||
V | Reporting Level | ||||||
1 | Organization Information | ||||||
2 | Integrated Circuit Design and Manufacturing | ||||||
3 | Rad Tolerant, Rad Hardened, Neutron Hardened IC Design & Manufacturing | ||||||
4 | Wafer Starts and Mask Production | ||||||
5 | Packaging | ||||||
6 | Software - On-Die Input/Output & Bit Cell and Memory | ||||||
7 | Performance of Design and Manufacturing Functions and Outsourcing | ||||||
8 | National Security Requirements | ||||||
9 | Materials and Equipment | ||||||
10 | Workforce | ||||||
11 | Sales | ||||||
12 | Financials | ||||||
13 | Mergers & Acquisitions, JVs | ||||||
14 | CAPEX | ||||||
15 | R&D | ||||||
16 | Export Controls | ||||||
17 | Trade and Intellectual Property | ||||||
18 | Competitiveness | ||||||
19 | Cybersecurity | ||||||
20 | Certification | ||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||
Section I: General Instructions | ||||||||||||
A. | Your organization is required to complete this survey of the U.S. Integrated Circuit industry using an Excel template, which can be downloaded from the BIS website: http://bis.doc.gov/chipsurvey If you are not able to download the survey document, at your request BIS, staff will e-mail the Excel survey template directly to you. For your convenience, a PDF version of the survey and required drop-down content is available on the BIS website to aid internal data collection. DO NOT SUBMIT the PDF version of the survey as your response to BIS. Should this occur, your organization will be required to resubmit the survey in the requested Excel format. |
|||||||||||
B. | Respond to every question. Surveys that are not fully completed will be returned for completion. Use the comment boxes to provide any information to supplement responses provided in the survey form. Make sure to record a complete answer in the cell provided, even if the cell does not appear to expand to fit all the information. DO NOT CUT AND PASTE RESPONSES WITHIN THIS SURVEY. Survey inputs should be completed by typing in responses or by use of a drop-down menu. The use of cut and paste can corrupt the survey template. If your survey response is corrupted as a result of cut and paste responses, a new survey will be sent to your organization for immediate completion. |
|||||||||||
C. | Do not disclose any classified information in this survey form. | |||||||||||
D. | Estimates are sometimes acceptable where indicated, but in sections that do not explicitly allow estimates you must contact BIS survey support staff before including estimates. | |||||||||||
E. | Upon completion of the survey, final review, and certification, transmit the survey document via e-mail to: [email protected] | |||||||||||
F. | Questions related to the survey should be directed to BIS survey support staff at [email protected] (E-mail is the preferred method of contact). You may also speak with a member of the BIS survey support staff by calling (202) 482-6339 |
|||||||||||
G. | For questions related to the overall scope of this Industrial Base assessment, contact: Brad Botwin, Director, Industrial Studies Office of Technology Evaluation, Room 1093 U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230 DO NOT submit completed surveys to Mr. Botwin's postal or e-mail address; all surveys must be submitted electronically to XXX |
|||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||
Section II: Definitions | |||||||||
Term | Definition | ||||||||
Applied Research | Systematic study to gain knowledge or understanding necessary to determine the means by which a recognized and specific need may be met. This activity includes work leading to the production of useful materials, devices, and systems or methods, including design, development, and improvement of prototypes and new processes. | ||||||||
Authorizing Official | Executive officer of the organization or business unit or other individual who has the authority to execute this survey on behalf of the organization. | ||||||||
Basic Research | Systematic, scientific study directed toward greater knowledge or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable facts. | ||||||||
Capability | The ability to perform defined design and/or manufacturing steps for producing integrated circuit products within an organization's own facilities and with its own employees with little or no outsourcing. | ||||||||
Capital Expenditures | Investments made by an organization in buildings, equipment, property, and systems where the expense is depreciated. This does not include expenditures for consumable materials, other operating expenses and salaries associated with normal business operations. | ||||||||
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code | Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code identifies companies doing or seeking to do business with the U.S. Federal Government. The code is used to support mechanized government systems and provides a standardized method of identifying a given facility at a specific location. Find CAGE codes at https://cage.dla.mil/search/. | ||||||||
Commercially Sensitive Information (CSI) | Privileged or proprietary information which, if compromised through alteration, corruption, loss, misuse, or unauthorized disclosure, could cause serious harm to the information's owners. | ||||||||
Customer | An entity to which an organization directly delivers the product or service that the facility produces. A customer may be another organization or another facility owned by the same parent organization. The customer may be the end user for the item but often will be an intermediate link in the supply chain, adding additional value before transferring the item to yet another customer. | ||||||||
Cyber Security | The body of technologies, processes, and practices designed to protect networks, computers, programs, and data from attack, damage, or unauthorized access. | ||||||||
Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) | A nine-digit numbering system that uniquely identifies an individual business. Find DUNS numbers at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. | ||||||||
Development | The design, development, simulation, or experimental testing of prototype or experimental hardware or systems, to validate technological feasibility or concept of operation, to reduce technological risk, or to provide test systems prior to production approval. | ||||||||
Design | Design activity required to implement a product concept in support of the manufacture of the Integrated Circuit product at a fabrication facility. | ||||||||
Facility | A facility can constitute a single building or multiple buildings functioning as a unified design, fabrication, or packaging facility. Design, fabrication, and packing, test and assembly operations must be identified separately. Individual wafer fabrication facilities serving distinct sets of technology nodes should be identified separately even if operating on a single campus. | ||||||||
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Employees | Employees who work for 40 hours in a normal work week. Convert part-time employees into "full time equivalents" by taking their work hours as a fraction of 40 hours. | ||||||||
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) | The Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) is the statute used to determine tariff classifications for goods imported in the United States and maintained and published by the United States International Trade Commission. The HTS is based on the International Harmonized System. | ||||||||
Integrated Circuit | Analog or digital devices that incorporate transistors, diodes, capacitors, resistors, and other circuit elements that are integrated on a single substrate (chip), typically silicon. | ||||||||
Location | For the purpose of this survey, a location is a single contiguous site. | ||||||||
Manufacturing | The production of a working Integrated Circuit product in a fabrication facility. | ||||||||
Neutron Hardened | Integrated Circuit products incorporating design features and/or physical characteristics that can withstand the damaging effects of high-speed neutrons, gamma rays, and electromagnetic pulses that accompany a nuclear weapons detonation. Most CMOS[1] technologies are inherently neutron hardened without any specific effort on the part of an ICs designer/manufacturer. For “minority carrier” IC devices that are affected by neutron-induced displacement damage, a level of 1X1014 n/cm2 (1MeV equivalent fluence) is the accepted standard.[2] | ||||||||
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code | North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes identify the category of product(s) or service(s) provided by an organization. Find NAICS codes at http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html | ||||||||
Organization | A company, firm, laboratory, or other entity that owns or controls one or more U.S. establishment capable of designing and/or manufacturing Integrated Circuit products. A company may be an individual proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, or corporation (including any subsidiary corporation in which more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting stock is owned by a business trust, cooperative, trustee(s) in bankruptcy, or receiver(s) under decree of any court owning or controlling one or more establishment. | ||||||||
Product/Process Development | Conceptualization and development of a product prior to the production of the product for customers. | ||||||||
Radiation Hardened | Integrated Circuit products incorporating design features and/or physical characteristics that demonstrate a capability to resist radiation-induced damage from industrial sources, electromagnetic pulses, weapons systems; and/or charged particles in space that can damage circuitry and render a device inoperable. Some IC devices may be considered radiation hardened when their total dose failure level exceeds >300 krad.[3] A total dose failure level of 500krad is the standard cited in International Traffic in Arms (ITAR) regulations.[4] | ||||||||
Radiation Tolerant | Integrated Circuit products incorporating design features and/or physical characteristics with limited capability to resist radiation induced damage from industrial sources, electromagnetic pulses, industrial sources, weapons systems, and charged particles in space that can damage circuitry and render a device inoperable. Radiation tolerant would cover parts having a total dose failure level >100 krad but less than 300 krad. | ||||||||
Research and Development | Basic and applied research in the engineering sciences, as well as design and development of prototype products and processes. | ||||||||
Semiconductor | Elemental materials such as silicon and germanium (or compounds like gallium arsenide) that possess levels of electrical conductivity that are less than a conductor but greater than an insulator. The properties of these materials and similar ones can be manipulated to affect conductivity through temperature and/or the use of dopants. | ||||||||
Service | An intangible product (contrasted to a good, which is a tangible product). Services typically cannot be stored or transported, are instantly perishable, and come into existence at the time they are bought and consumed. | ||||||||
Single-Event Effects Resistant | Single-event effects caused by a single energetic particle striking an Integrated Circuit (IC) device. Performance of the IC device is not compromised to a point where it is inoperable or not reliable for executing a mission as a result of latch-up, burnout, or gate rupture. | ||||||||
Single Source | An organization that is designated as the only accepted source for the supply of parts, components, materials, or services, even though other sources with equivalent technical know-how and production capability may exist. | ||||||||
Sole Source | An organization that is the only source for the supply of parts, components, materials, or services. No alternative U.S. or non-U.S. based suppliers exist other than the current supplier. | ||||||||
Supplier | An entity from which your organization obtains inputs. A supplier may be another firm with which you have a contractual relationship, or it may be another facility owned by the same parent organization. The inputs may be goods or services. | ||||||||
Trusted Access Program | A program implemented by the National Security Agency and the Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) to qualify Integrated Circuit design and manufacturing companies as “trusted” suppliers of application specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) products required for national security applications. | ||||||||
United States | The "United States" or "U.S." includes the 50 states, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, the island of Guam, the Trust Territories, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. | ||||||||
Wafer Starts Per Week | The number of semiconductor wafers that can be processed by an Integrated Circuit production line(s) in a 7-day period. | ||||||||
[1] Complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) is a class of semiconductor used in digital logic circuits employed in microcontrollers, microprocessors, memory, and other devices. The technology also is used in analog circuits in sensors, transceivers, data converters and other systems. | |||||||||
[2] Sandia National Laboratories. A minority carrier device is a device in which current is conducted by charge carriers of sign (positive or negative) opposite to the dopant polarity of the underlying semiconductor material. In other words, current carried by electrons (negative) in a p-type semiconductor, or by holes in an n-type semiconductor. In semiconductors, minority charge carriers are less abundant than majority charge carriers. Minority carrier devices: Bipolar junction transistors, charge-coupled devices (CCDs), solar cells. | |||||||||
[3] Sandia National Laboratories. | |||||||||
[4] ITAR Part 121 – The United States Munitions List (See www.pmddtc.state.gov/consolidated_itar.htm. [Microelectronic circuits are considered radiation hardened when they exceed all five of these standards: (1) Total dose of 5x105 Rads (Si); (2) Dose rate upset of 5x108 Rads (Si) per second; (3) Neutron dose of 1x1014 N/cm2; (4) Single-Event upset of 1x10minus;7 or less error/bit/day; and (5) Single-Event latch-up free and having a dose rate latch-up of 5x108 Rads (Si) per second or greater.] | |||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||
Section III: Organization Reporting Profile | ||||||
This survey consists of sections that must be answered at the Corporate Level and other sections that must be answered at the Facility Level. The reporting level will be specified at the top of each section in RED. Facilities that will be responding separately from their corporate headquarters should proceed to section 1a to begin the survey. | ||||||
Description of Business Activity | ||||||
A. | Select the description of your organization's U.S. operations that that most closely reflects its business: |
|||||
Design Integrated Circuit products (fabless) | Yes/No | |||||
Design and Manufacture Integrated Circuit products (integrated device manufacturer) | ||||||
Design and Manufacture Integrated Circuit products; and perform Package, Test & Assembly | ||||||
Manufacture Integrated Circuit products (as a foundry) | ||||||
Manufacture Integrated Circuit products (as a foundry) and perform Package, Test & Assembly | ||||||
Design Integrated Circuit products (fabless); and perform Package, Test & Assembly | ||||||
Provide Package, Test & Assembly Services | ||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||
B. | Identify the number of Integrated Circuit-related design and manufacturing facilities that your organization operated in the United States in 2016. | IC Activity | U.S. Locations |
Non-U.S. Locations |
||
Design | ||||||
Manufacturing | ||||||
Packaging, Test & Assembly |
||||||
Comments: | ||||||
C. | Identify all of your organization's Integrated Circuit-related Design, Manufacturing, and Packaging facilities* located in the United States. | |||||
Facility* Name | City | State | DMEA Certified Trusted** Facility |
Primary Scope of Work |
||
Yes | Design | |||||
No | Manufacturing | |||||
PT&A | ||||||
Other | ||||||
*Facilities can constitute a single building or multiple buildings functioning as a unified design, fabrication, or packaging facility. Design, fabrication, and packing, test and assembly operations must be identified separately. Individual wafer fabrication facilities serving distinct sets of technology nodes should be identified separately even if operating on a single campus. | ||||||
** "Trusted" refers to certification from the Defense Microelectronics Activity's Trusted Accredidation Program to design or manufacture Integrated Circuit products. | ||||||
Comments: | ||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||
Section III: Reporting Level (Cont.) | |||||||
A. | Is your organization publicly traded or privately held? | If your organization is publicly traded, identify its stock ticker symbol. | |||||
B. | Provide the following identification codes, as applicable, for your organization. | ||||||
Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Code(s) | Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) Code(s) | NAICS (6-digit) Code(s)* | |||||
Find DUNS numbers at: | Find HTS numbers at: | Find NAICS codes at: | |||||
http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform | http://hts.usitc.gov | http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html | |||||
C. | Indicate if your organization qualifies as any of the following types of business: | ||||||
A small business enterprise (as defined by the Small Business Administration) | |||||||
8(a) Firm (as defined by the Small Business Administration) | |||||||
A historically underutilized business zone (HUB Zone) | |||||||
A minority-owned business | |||||||
A woman-owned business | |||||||
A veteran-owned or service-disabled veteran owned business | |||||||
D. | Specify the industry sectors that your organization serves through the provision of design and/or manufacturing services for Integrated Circuit products located in the United States: | ||||||
Aviation systems/Avionics | Yes | Healthcare/Medical Devices | |||||
Automotive | No | Industrial | |||||
Consumer electronics | N/A | Military and Space | |||||
Communications | Other National Security systems | ||||||
Electronic Data Processing | Optical/Photonics | ||||||
Energy | Other [Write In] | ||||||
Comments: | |||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||
FACILITY LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||
Section 1a: Organization Information | |||||||||
This survey consists of sections that must be answered at the Corporate Level and other sections that must be answered at the Facility Level. The reporting level will be specified at the top of each section as appropriate. | |||||||||
A. | Provide the following information for your facility. | ||||||||
Facility Name | |||||||||
Street Address | |||||||||
City | |||||||||
State | |||||||||
Zip Code | |||||||||
Website | |||||||||
Phone Number | |||||||||
CAGE Code (if applicable) | |||||||||
B. | Select the option that most closely describes this facility's Primary Business, and indicate any "Additional Business Lines." | Primary Business | Integrated circuit/semiconductor product design facility | ||||||
Integrated circuit/semiconductor product fabrication facility | |||||||||
Additional Business Line | Integrated circuit/semiconductor product packaging, assembly, and test facility | ||||||||
Integrated circuit/semiconductor product research and development facility | |||||||||
Additional Business Line | Integrated circuit/semiconductor product corporate headquarters facility | ||||||||
N/A | |||||||||
C. | Provide the following information for your parent organization(s), if applicable. Enter N/A if no parent organization. | ||||||||
Parent Organization 1 | Parent Organization 2 | ||||||||
Organization Name | |||||||||
Street Address | |||||||||
City | |||||||||
State/Province | |||||||||
Country | |||||||||
Postal Code/Zip Code | |||||||||
D. | Point of Contact regarding this survey: | ||||||||
Name | Title | Phone Number | E-mail Address | State | |||||
Comments: | |||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||||
FACILITY LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||||
Section 2 Integrated Circuit Design & Manufacturing | ||||||||||||||||
2.a List this facility's Integrated Circuit Design and Manufacturing product capabilities and market types in the United States in calendar year 2016. | ||||||||||||||||
Design and Manufacturing Facility Market Types and Capabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Product Capabilities | Conventional Integrated Circuit Products | Single-Event Effects Resistant | Radiation Tolerant | Radiation Hardened | Neutron Hardened | |||||||||||
Market Types | Commercial | Industrial | Military/Space | Commercial | Industrial | Military/Space | Commercial | Industrial | Military/Space | Commercial | Industrial | Military/Space | Commercial | Industrial | Military/Space | |
Design/Manufacture/Both/Neither | ||||||||||||||||
2.b Identify this facility's Integrated Circuit-related design and manufacturing capabilities by technology node, wafer size, and material type: | ||||||||||||||||
Capability to Design and/or Manufacture - by Technology Node, Wafer Size & Material Type | ||||||||||||||||
Minimum Technology Node Capability [nanometers] | -- by Wafer Size |
(Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability") | ||||||||||||||
Amorphous Silicon | Bulk Silicon | Silicon on Insulator | Silicon Germanium | Silicon on Sapphire | Silicon Carbide | Aluminum Gallium Arsenide | Gallium Arsenide | Gallium Nitride | Indium Phosphide | Antimonides | Organic Technologies | Carbon Based Technologies (e.g., nanotubes) | Superconducting Materials | |||
< 7* - 10,000 | 2- or 3-inch | Design - Conventional | ||||||||||||||
4-inch | Design - Radiation Resistant | |||||||||||||||
6-inch | Manufacture - Conventional | |||||||||||||||
8-inch | Manufacture - Radiation Resistant | |||||||||||||||
12-inch | Both - Design | |||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||||
Note: 10,000 nanometers equals 10 micrometers *Respond to this specification if your organization expects to develop a capability to work at this Technology Node by 2021. | ||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Section 2 Integrated Circuit Design & Manufacturing - continued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2.c Specify your organization's design and manufacturing capabilities by device type with regard to the production of custom radiation-tolerant, radiation-hardened, and neutron hardened Integrated Circuit products located in the United States: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Device Type | Capability to Design and/or Manufacture - by Device & Material Type | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No capability") | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventiona IC Products | Radiation Tolerant | Radiation Hardened | Neutron Hardened | Single-Event Effects Resistant - Destructive | Single-Event Effects Resistant -Non-Destructive | Amorphous Silicon |
Bulk Silicon | Silicon on Insulator |
Silicon Germanium |
Silicon on Sapphire |
Silicon Carbide |
Aluminum Gallium Arsenide | Gallium Arsenide |
Gallium Nitride |
Indium Phosphate |
Antimonides | Organic Technologies |
Carbon Based Technologies (e.g., nanotubes) | Superconducting Materials | |||
Analog/Linear Technologies | Design | |||||||||||||||||||||
Digital Logic Technologies | Manufacture | |||||||||||||||||||||
Digital Signal Processors | Both | |||||||||||||||||||||
Field Programmable Gate Arrays | Neither | |||||||||||||||||||||
One-time, Electrically Programmable Gate Arrays | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mask Programmable Gate Arrays | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Structured ASICs [a.k.a. Structured Arrays; Platform ASICs] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard Cell ASICs [a.k.a. cell-based ASICs] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Custom ASICs | ||||||||||||||||||||||
MMIC** Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mixed Signal Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Processors | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonvolatile Memory | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3-D Nonvolatile Memory | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SRAM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DRAM - DDR3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
DRAM - DDR4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IR*-Focal Plane Arrays | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Anti-Tamper Technology | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Display Electronics | ||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMS Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Optical/Photonic Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
RF Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other: [Write In] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||||||||
FACILITY LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||||||||
Section 2 Integrated Circuit Design & Manufacturing - Continued | ||||||||||||||||||||
2.d Identify this facility's design and manufacturing capabilities with regard to the production of Nonvolatile Memory devices, memory density, and access time: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Do not complete this page if your organization does not design Nonvolatile Memory products. Proceed to | Section 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Memory Device Type (Stand-Alone) |
Capability to Design Nonvolatile Memory - by Device, Density, Read-Write Speed | |||||||||||||||||||
Memory Density | Access Time [Nano Seconds (ns)] |
Write/Erase | ||||||||||||||||||
Select all that apply - A blank response is counted as "No capability" | Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No capability" | [Provide specifications] | ||||||||||||||||||
<1 Mbit | 1- <8 Mbit | 16- <32 Mbit | 64- <128 Mbit | 256 - <1024 Mbit | 1- <8 Gbit | 16 - <32 Gbit | 64 - <128 Gbit | > 128 Gbit | 100- 300ps **** |
300 - <700ps |
700ps - <1ns |
1-<10ns | 10-<20ns | 20-<50ns | 50-<150ns | >150ns | Size | Time | ||
Specify data size: Word, page, block, etc. | (Write in Spec.) | |||||||||||||||||||
Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM) | Design | Write In | Write In | |||||||||||||||||
Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM) | Manufacture | |||||||||||||||||||
Flash - NOR* | Both | |||||||||||||||||||
Flash - NAND | Neither | |||||||||||||||||||
Flash - NAND 3D** | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ferro Electric (FeRAM) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Magnetoresistive (MRAM) | ||||||||||||||||||||
MEMS-base (nanotube, NRAM) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Memristor*** | ||||||||||||||||||||
Phase Change Memory (PCM, a.k.a. PRAM) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Polymer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Storage Class Memory (e.g., RRAM) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Super Permanent Memory (XPM) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Zero Capacitor (ZRAM) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||||||||||||||||
*NOR Flash memory is able to read individual flash memory cells, and as such it behaves like a traditional read-only memory (ROM). **Nonvolatile random access memory that can be erased electronically and rewritten up to 100,000 times. *** A non-volatile memory technology that can change its resistance in varying levels. It can offer resistance in two states for a digital 0 or 1 or to levels in between to go beyond a binary system. **** Pico second = 1 trillionith of a second. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||||
Section 3 Rad Tolerant, Rad Hardened, Neutron Hardened IC Design & Manufacturing | ||||||||||||||||
3.a Identify your organization's current capabilities, previous capabilities and interest in developing capabilities in design, manufacturing or both for each of the following types of Integrated Circuit. | ||||||||||||||||
Type of Integrated Circuit | Currently (in 2017) has capabilities to: | Had capabilities 2013-2016 | Interested in developing capabilities for U.S. Government | |||||||||||||
Re-constituting Capacity | Initiating Capacity | |||||||||||||||
Radiation Tolerant | Design | Design | Design | Design | ||||||||||||
Radiation Hardened | Manufacture | Manufacture | Manufacture | Manufacture | ||||||||||||
Neutron Hardened | Both | Both | Both | Both | ||||||||||||
Single-Events Effects Resistant - Destructive | Neither | Neither | Neither | Neither | ||||||||||||
Single-Event Effects Resistant - Nondestructive | ||||||||||||||||
Does your organization design or manufacture Radiation Tolerant, Radiation Hardened, Neutron Hardened or Single-Event Effects Resistant Integrated Circuits? | Yes/No | If no, proceed to Section 4. | ||||||||||||||
3.b Identify your organization's capabilities to design and/or manufacture custom Integrated Circuit products that are Radiation Tolerant, Radiation Hardened, Neutron Hardened or Single-Event Effects Resistant at locations in the United States. | ||||||||||||||||
Capability to Design and/or Manufacture - by Material Type | ||||||||||||||||
(Select all that apply - A blank response is counted as "No capability") | ||||||||||||||||
Amorphous Silicon |
Bulk Silicon | Silicon on Insulator |
Silicon Germanium |
Silicon on Sapphire |
Silicon Carbide |
Aluminum Gallium Arsenide | Gallium Arsenide |
Gallium Nitride |
Indium Phosphate |
Antimonides | Organic Technologies |
Carbon Based Technologies (e.g., nanotubes) | Superconducting Materials | |||
Radiation Tolerant | Design | |||||||||||||||
Radiation Hardened | Manufacture | |||||||||||||||
Neutron Hardened | Both | |||||||||||||||
Single-Event Effects Resistant - Destructive | Neither | |||||||||||||||
Single-Event Effects Resistant - Non-Destructive |
||||||||||||||||
Radiation Tolerant: Integrated circuit products incorporating design features and/or physical characteristics with limited capability to resist effects from radiation induced damage (ionizing dose) from industrial sources, electromagnetic pulses, weapons systems, and charged particles in space that can damage circuitry and render a device inoperable. | ||||||||||||||||
Radiation Hardened: Integrated circuit products incorporating design features and/or physical characteristics that demonstrate a capability to resist effects from radiation-induced damage (ionizing dose) from industrial sources, electromagnetic pulses, weapons systems, or charged particles in space that can damage circuitry and render a device inoperable. | ||||||||||||||||
Neutron Hardened: Integrated circuit products incorporating design features and/or physical characteristics that can withstand the damaging effects of high-speed neutrons, gamma rays, and electromagnetic pulses that accompany a nuclear weapons detonation. | ||||||||||||||||
Single-Event Effects (SEE) Resistant - Destructive: Resistant to effects caused by a single energetic particle striking an Integrated Circuit (IC) device. Performance of the IC device is not compromised to a point where it is inoperable or not reliable for executing a mission as a result of event latch-up, burnout, or gate rupture, or snapback. [Immune to destructive SEEs up to an ion linear energy transfer (LET) of 80 MeV.cm2/mg.] | ||||||||||||||||
Single-Event Effects Resistant - Non-Destructive: Resistant to effects caused by a single energetic particle striking an Integrated Circuit (IC) device. Performance of the IC device is not compromised to a point where it is inoperable or not reliable for executing a mission as a result of event upset, transient, or functional interrupt. [Immune to non-destructive SEEs is at an LET of 30-40 MeV.cm 2/mg.] | ||||||||||||||||
*Organization possesses manufacturing process technology to achieve radiation tolerance, hardening, or neutron hardening. | ||||||||||||||||
Comments: |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||||
FACILITY LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||||
Section 4 Manufacturing Capabilities & Production Rates | ||||||||||||||||
Does your organization manufacture Integrated Circuits? | Yes/No | [If no, proceed to section 4c] | ||||||||||||||
4.a 1) State the average manufacturing capacity utilization rates at your U.S. -based fabrication facility for the years 2013-2016. Then, 2) state the maximum number of wafer starts possible per week at your manufacturing facility; 3) state the actual average wafer starts per week at your facility; and 4) indicate whether this facility will be operating through 2021. | ||||||||||||||||
Average Manufacturing Capacity Utilization Rates | 2016 Maximum number of Wafer Starts Per Week* | 2016 Average Actual Wafer Starts Per Week** | Will this Facility Operate Through 2021? | |||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
% | % | % | % | # | # | Yes/No | ||||||||||
*Normalized to 8-inch wafer equivalents. | ||||||||||||||||
**Assumes 7-days-a-week operations. | ||||||||||||||||
Note: a 100% utilization rate equals full operation with no downtime beyond that necessary for maintenance | ||||||||||||||||
4.b Specify the maximum Wafer Start capacity per week of your facility in 2016 in the United States by technology node, wafer size, and material type. | ||||||||||||||||
Wafer Starts Per Week by Circuit Technology Node, Wafer Size & Material Type | ||||||||||||||||
(State your wafer-start-per-week capacity -- A blank response is counted as "No capability") | ||||||||||||||||
Minimum Technology Node Capability [nanometers] | -- by Wafer Size |
Amorphous Silicon |
Bulk Silicon | Silicon on Insulator |
Silicon Germanium |
Silicon on Sapphire |
Silicon Carbide |
Aluminum Gallium Arsenide | Gallium Arsenide |
Gallium Nitride |
Indium Phosphate |
Antimonides | Organic Technologies |
Carbon Based Technologies (e.g., nanotubes) | Superconducting Materials | |
< 7* - 10,000 | 2- or 3-inch | Write In # | ||||||||||||||
4-inch | ||||||||||||||||
6-inch | ||||||||||||||||
8-inch | ||||||||||||||||
12-inch | ||||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||||
Note: 10,000 nanometers equals 10 micrometers *Respond to this specification if your organization expects to develop a capability to work at this Technology Node by 2021. | ||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||||||||||
FACILITY LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||||||||||
Section 4 Mask Production and Capability | |||||||||||||||||
Does your organization currently have captive, in-house Integrated Circuit mask-making capability? | Yes/No | [If no, proceed to section 5] | |||||||||||||||
4.c Identify all technology nodes (nanometer ranges) for which your organization is capable of producing masks at company-owned and operated facilities located in 1) the United States; and 2) in company-owned and operated facilities sited at non-U.S. locations. | |||||||||||||||||
Mask Technology Node (Nanometers) | |||||||||||||||||
(Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability") | |||||||||||||||||
Location | 10000 - 6000 | <6000 - 3000 | <3000 - 1500 | <1000 - 800 | <800 - 500 | <500 - 350 | <350 - 250 | <250 - 180 | <180-130 | <130 - 90 | <90 -65 | <65 - 45 | <45-32 | <32-28 | <22-14 | <10-7 | <7 |
U.S. | Non-U.S. | Both | |||||||||||||||
Indicate the percentages of your organization's Binary and Phase-Shift mask production that are fulfilled in-house and by external mask makers. | |||||||||||||||||
Binary Mask Blanks | Phase-Shift Mask Blanks | ||||||||||||||||
What percent of your organization's binary mask requirements are fulfilled by mask production performed: | In-House | by External Mask Makers | What percent of your organization's phase-shift mask requirements are fulfilled by mask production performed: | In-House | by External Mask Makers | ||||||||||||
U.S. | Non-U.S. | U.S. | Non-U.S. | U.S. | Non-U.S. | U.S. | Non-U.S. | ||||||||||
% | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||
Section 5: Performance of Production Steps – Wafer Processing & Die Packaging | ||||||||||||
Does your organization manufacture Integrated Circuits? | Yes/No | [If no, proceed to section 6] | ||||||||||
1) Identify the Integrated Circuit wafer processing and wafer die packaging steps that your organization performs at its facilities in the United States and at facilities it owns in Non-U.S. locations. 2) Identify the names of the supplier(s) that your organization employs to perform wafer processing and die packaging activities at facilities outside the United States and provide the country locations where that work is performed. Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability." | ||||||||||||
Wafer Processing and Packaging Steps | U.S. | Non-U.S. Location | Country/Countries of Company-Owned Facilities | List of Suppliers | ||||||||
Country #1 | Country #2 | Country #3 | Equipment Supplier #1 | Equipment Supplier Country #1 | Equipment Supplier #2 Name | Equipment Supplier Country #2 | Equipment Supplier #3 Name | Equipment Supplier Country #3 | ||||
Wafer Thinning | ||||||||||||
Backgrinding | Yes/No | Yes/No | ||||||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||||||||
Wafer Dicing | ||||||||||||
Saw Blade | Yes/No | Yes/No | ||||||||||
Laser Dicing | ||||||||||||
Plasma Dicing | ||||||||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||||||||
Interconnects | ||||||||||||
Wired Bonding | Yes/No | Yes/No | ||||||||||
Solder Bumping | ||||||||||||
Stud Bumping | ||||||||||||
Pillar | ||||||||||||
Redistribution Layer Connects | ||||||||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||||||||
Circuit Bonding | ||||||||||||
Direct Die Film (DDF) Attach | Yes/No | Yes/No | ||||||||||
Silver Glass Attach | ||||||||||||
Leaded Solder Attach | ||||||||||||
Gold Silicon Eutectic Attach | ||||||||||||
Wafer-to-Wafer | ||||||||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||||||||
Substrate/Packaging | ||||||||||||
Ceramic | Yes/No | Yes/No | ||||||||||
Organic | ||||||||||||
Through Silicon Via | ||||||||||||
Flexible | ||||||||||||
Other [Write In] | ||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||
Section 6a: | On-Die INPUT/OUTPUT Integrated Circuit Devices & Enabling Firmware | |||||||||||
State the percentage of Integrated Circuit On-Die Input/Output Controllers and Firmware used by your organization in 2016 that were 1) produced internally at company facilities located in the U.S. and at Non-U.S. company locations; 2) licensed from U.S. companies, and 3) licensed from non-U.S. companies. Secondly, identify the top three non- U.S. suppliers and countries that were sources of these controllers and firmware used in products manufactured by your company in 2016. Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability." | ||||||||||||
Company Produced / Licensed On-Die Input/Output Controllers and Firmware | Non-U.S. Countries and Suppliers | |||||||||||
Type of On-die Hardware Protocol Controller & Firmware Controlled Device | Internally Produced at Company Locations in U.S. | Internally Produced at Company Locations Outside the U.S. | Licensed from U.S. Companies | Licensed from non-U.S. Companies | Total (must add up to 100%) | Supplier #1 Name | Country #1 | Supplier #2 Name | Country #2 | Supplier #3 Name | Country #3 | |
PCI Express - Controller | % | % | % | % | % | |||||||
PCI Express - Firmware | ||||||||||||
Ethernet (1G, 10G, 25G, 100G) - Controller | ||||||||||||
Ethernet (1G, 10G, 25G, 100G) - Firmware | ||||||||||||
USB (1.0, 2.0, 3.0) - Controller | ||||||||||||
USB (1.0, 2.0, 3.0) - Firmware | ||||||||||||
SATA - Controller | ||||||||||||
SATA - Firmware | ||||||||||||
Thunderbolt - Controller | ||||||||||||
Thunderbolt - Firmware | ||||||||||||
Firewire - Controller | ||||||||||||
Firewire - Firmware | ||||||||||||
Memory - DDR3 and DDR4 - Controller | ||||||||||||
Memory - DDR3 and DDR4 - Firmware | ||||||||||||
ZigBee - Controller | ||||||||||||
ZigBee - Firmware | ||||||||||||
Bluetooth - Controller | ||||||||||||
Bluetooth - Firmware | ||||||||||||
802.11 - Controller | ||||||||||||
802.11 - Firmware | ||||||||||||
Other - Controller [Write in] | ||||||||||||
Other - Firmware [Write in] | ||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||
Section 6b: | Embedded Integrated Circuit Bit Cell and Memory Compiler Intellectual Property Sources | |||||||||||
For your analog, Application Specific Integrated Circuit and Field Programmable Gate Array products, state the percentage of embedded Integrated Circuit bit cell and memory compiler intellectual property used by your organization in 2016 that was 1) produced internally at company facilities located in the U.S. and at Non-U.S. company locations; 2) licensed from U.S. companies, and 3) licensed from non-U.S. companies. Secondly, identify the top three non- U.S. suppliers and countries that were sources of bit cell and memory compiler intellectual property used in products manufactured by your company in 2016. Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability." | ||||||||||||
Company Produced / Licensed Bit Cell and Memory Compiler IP | Country and Sources of Bit Cell, Memory Compiler IP | |||||||||||
Type of Memory Device IP | Internally Produced at Company Locations in U.S. | Internally Produced at Company Locations Outside the U.S. | Licensed from U.S. Companies | Licensed from non-U.S. Companies | Total (must add up to 100%) | Supplier #1 Name | Country #1 | Supplier #2 Name | Country #2 | Supplier #3 Name | Country #3 | |
Embedded EEPROM – Bit Cell | % | % | % | % | % | |||||||
Embedded EEPROM – Memory Compiler | ||||||||||||
Embedded FLASH – Bit Cell | ||||||||||||
Embedded FLASH – Memory Compiler | ||||||||||||
Embedded SRAM – Bit Cell | ||||||||||||
Embedded SRAM – Memory Compiler | ||||||||||||
Embedded DRAM – Bit Cell | ||||||||||||
Embedded DRAM – Memory Compiler | ||||||||||||
Embedded Other – Bit Cell | [Write in] | |||||||||||
Embedded Other – Memory Compiler | [Write in] | |||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||
Section 7a Performance of Production Functions for the Design of Integrated Circuits | ||||||||||||||
Answer the questions on this page ONLY if your organization operates design facilities in the United States to produce Integrated Circuit products. If your organization does not operate design facilities in the United States, proceed to Section 7b. | ||||||||||||||
Identify practices from the list below that reflect; 1) your organization's business methods in regard to execution of the eight design functions listed along the top of this page; 2) its practices and plans on outsourcing Integrated Circuit design. | ||||||||||||||
Respond to All Questions | Integrated Circuit Design Functions | |||||||||||||
Analog | Digital | RTL Design* | Synthesis** | Physical Layout*** | Functional Verification**** | Simulation | Test Vector Generation***** | Other (Specify Here) | ||||||
1. In 2016 performed the following Integrated Circuit Design Steps at facilities in the United States that it owns and operates: | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
2. Did not design at its own U.S. facilities, but contracted with other U.S.-based organizations to perform the design tasks at their U.S. facilities. | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
3. For the 2017-2021, my organization expects to retain capability to perform the following Integrated Circuit design steps at facilities in the United States that it owns and operates. | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
4. For 2017-2021 period, my organization will secure other U.S.-based vendors to complete these design steps at their facilities in the United States. | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
5. Anticipates that the organization's capabilities to perform the following the eight design steps facilities in the United States will: | Increase/Decrease/No Change | |||||||||||||
6. Expects that its use of outsourcing in 2017-2021 will : | Increase/Decrease/No Change | |||||||||||||
7. In 2016, my organization outsourced the following Integrated Circuit design steps to facilities located outside of the United States that it owns and operates: | Yes/No/Unknown | |||||||||||||
8. The following Integrated Circuit design steps were out-sourced in 2016 to non-U.S. companies operating at non-U.S. locations: | Yes/No/Unknown | |||||||||||||
9. The three primary reasons why my organization outsources Integrated Circuit design steps to non-U's locations are: | Reason # 1 | Reason #2 | Reason #3 | <----- Reasons for Outsourcing | ||||||||||
10. In the space provided, identify the top five countries to which your organization outsources Integrated Circuit design: |
Country #1 | Country #2 | Country #3 | Tariff avoidance | Lower costs | Joint venture | ||||||||
Country #4 | Country #5 | Proximity to customer | Market access | Availability of skilled labor | ||||||||||
Comments: | Government subsidies | Production efficiency | Other | |||||||||||
Complete the Next Page, Section 7b, If your organization outsources Integrated Circuit manufacturing steps to non-U.S. locations. | ||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||
Section 7b Performance of Production Functions for the Manufacture of Integrated Circuits | ||||||||||||||
Answer the questions on this page ONLY if your organization operates manufacturing facilities in the United States to produce Integrated Circuit products. If your organization does not operate manufacturing facilities in the United States, proceed to Section 7c. | ||||||||||||||
Identify practices from the list below that reflect; 1) your organization's business methods in regard to execution of the eight manufacturing functions listed along the top of this page; 2) its practices and plans on outsourcing Integrated Circuit manufacturing. | ||||||||||||||
Respond to All Questions | Integrated Circuit Manufacturing Functions | |||||||||||||
Mask Making | Wafer Manufacturing (Front End) |
Wafer Manufacturing (Back End) |
E-Test | Wafer Sorting | Dicing | Packaging | Final Test & Inspection | Other (Specify Here) | ||||||
1. In 2016 performed the following Integrated Circuit Manufacturing Steps at facilities in the United States that it owns and operates: | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
2. Did not manufacture at its own U.S. facilities, but contracted with other U.S.-based organizations to perform the manufacturing tasks at their U.S. facilities. | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
3. For the 2017-2021, my organization expects to retain capability to perform the following Integrated Circuit manufacturing steps at facilities in the United States that it owns and operates. | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
4. For 2017-2021 period, my organization will secure other U.S.-based vendors to complete these manufacturing steps at their facilities in the United States. | Yes/No/Not Applicable | |||||||||||||
5. Anticipates that the organization's capabilities to perform the following the eight manufacturing steps facilities in the United States will: | Increase/Decrease/No Change | |||||||||||||
6. Expects that its use of outsourcing in 2017-2021 will : | Increase/Decrease/No Change | |||||||||||||
7. In 2016, my organization outsourced the following Integrated Circuit manufacturing steps to facilities located outside of the United States that it owns and operates: | Yes/No/Unknown | |||||||||||||
8. The following Integrated Circuit manufacturing steps were out-sourced in 2016 to non-U.S. companies operating at non-U.S. locations: | Yes/No/Unknown | |||||||||||||
9. The three primary reasons why my organization outsources Integrated Circuit manufacturing steps to non-U's locations are: | Reason # 1 | Reason #2 | Reason #3 | <----- Reasons for Outsourcing | ||||||||||
10. In the space provided, identify the top five countries to which your organization outsources Integrated Circuit manufacturing: |
Country #1 | Country #2 | Country #3 | Tariff avoidance | Lower costs | Joint venture | ||||||||
Country #4 | Country #5 | Proximity to customer | Market access | Availability of skilled labor | ||||||||||
Comments: | Government subsidies | Production efficiency | Other | |||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section 7c Outsourcing of Production Steps for the Design and Manufacture of Integrated Circuits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specify the characteristics of the Integrated Circuit products for which your organization outsources Design and/or Manufacturing Steps. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If your organization does not outsource Integrated Circuit design or manufacturing facilities in the United States, proceed to | Section 8. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Device Types | Outsourced Design - by Device Type, Material, & Circuit Technology Node | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability") | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capability | Semiconductor Material Types | Circuit Technology Node [nanometers] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional IC Products | Radiation Tolerant | Radiation Hardened | Neutron Hardened | Single-Event Effects Resistant - Destructive | Single-Event Effects Resistant - Non-Destructive | Amorphous Silicon |
Bulk Silicon | Silicon on Insulator |
Silicon Germanium |
Silicon on Sapphire |
Silicon Carbide |
Aluminum Gallium Arsenide | Gallium Arsenide |
Gallium Nitride |
Indium Phosphate |
Antimonides | Organic Technologies |
Carbon Based Technologies (e.g., nanotubes) | Superconducting Materials | 10,000 - 6,000 | 3,000 - <6,000 | 1,500 - <3,000 | 1,000 - <1,500 | 800 - <1,000 | 500 - <800 | 350 - <500 | 250 - <350 | 180 - <250 | 130 - <180 | 90 - <130 | 65 - <90 | 45 - <60 | 32 - <45 | 28 - <32 | 14 - <22 | 7 - <10 | < 7 | |||
Analog/Linear Technologies | Design | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Digital Logic Technologies | Manufacture | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Digital Signal Processors | Both | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Field Programmable Gate Arrays | Neither | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-time, Electrically Programmable Gate Arrays | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mask Programmable Gate Arrays | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structured ASICs [a.k.a. Structured Arrays; Platform ASICs] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard Cell ASICs [a.k.a. cell-based ASICs] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Custom ASICs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MMIC** Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mixed Signal Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Processors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonvolatile Memory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3-D Nonvolatile Memory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SRAM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DRAM - DDR3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DRAM - DDR4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IR*-Focal Plane Arrays | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anti-Tamper Technology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Display Electronics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMS Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Optical/Photonic Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RF Technologies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other: [Write In] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||
Section 8a: National Security Requirements - The Trusted Access Program | |||||
1. Does your organization have in place today an ability to design or manufacture custom Integrated Circuit products in a trusted* environment located in the United States that conforms to Department of Defense (DOD) standards for the conduct of such work? | Design/Manufacture/Both/Not Applicable | ||||
2. Has your organization been certified by DOD's Trusted Access Program Office at the Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) as a 'trusted' supplier of Integrated Circuit products? | Yes/No/Not Applicable | ||||
3. Is your organization planning to seek certification by DOD's Trusted Access Program Office at the Defense Microelectronics Activity as a 'trusted' supplier of Integrated Circuit products? | Yes/No/Unknown | ||||
4. How does your organization view the return on investment associated with expenses incurred for securing accreditation through DMEA's Trusted Access Program? | Favorably/Unfavorably/No opinion | ||||
5. Is your organization familiar with alternatives to the current Trusted Access Program and, if so, which do you assess most favorably? (Split manufacturing, Trust by design, Tiers of trust) | Unfamiliar/Split Manufacturing/Tiers of Trust/Trust by Design | ||||
6. If your organization has recently withdrawn from operating a facility from the Trusted Access Program or is planning to do so, identify the affected facility by name and address and explain the reason for your organization's action in the space below. | |||||
Name: | Address: | ||||
Explanation: | |||||
7. If you answered "Yes" to Question 1, 2, or 3 identify the manufacturing and/or design facilities for which (1) certification has been awarded, (2) the facilities for which certification is being sought or may be sought, and (3) the primary business activity at that facility. | |||||
Facility Name(s) | City | State | Awarded Certification | Seeking Certification | Business Activity |
Yes/No | Yes/No | Design | |||
Manufacture | |||||
Package, Test, Assembly | |||||
Comments: | |||||
* "Trusted" refers to certification from the Defense Microelectronics Activity's Trusted Accreditation Program to design or manufacture Integrated Circuits. | |||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||
Section 8b National Security Requirements - Outlook on Future Capability to Supply Integrated Circuit Products | |||||||
For each of the Integrated Circuit devices listed, indicate 1) how your organization's ability to design and/or manufacture at its United States facilities may change in the next five years. 2) State the primary factor contributing to this change (if applicable); and 3) Identify the types of customers that would be affected by this change. | |||||||
Device Types | (Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability") | ||||||
Integrated Circuit Design | Integrated Circuit Manufacturing | ||||||
Future Capability | Primary Factor | Types of Affected Customers |
Future Capability | Primary Factor | Types of Affected Customers |
||
Analog/Linear Technologies | |||||||
Digital Logic Technologies | Increase | Labor costs | Commercial (COTS standard Products) |
||||
Digital Signal Processors | Decrease | Cost of Modernization | Commercial (Custom Products) |
||||
Field Programmable Gate Arrays | Cease | Low order volume | Industrial (COTS standard Products) |
||||
One-time, Electrically Programmable Gate Arrays | No Change | Manufacturing Difficulty | Industrial (Custom Products) |
||||
Mask Programmable Gate Arrays | N/A | Meeting DOD Requirements | U.S. Government Agencies - excluding DOD (Custom Products) | ||||
Structured ASICs [a.k.a. Structured Arrays; Platform ASICs] | Regulations | DOD (Custom Products) | |||||
Standard Cell ASICs [a.k.a. cell-based ASICs] | Technology lag | DOD (COTS standard Products) | |||||
Custom ASICs | Low Profitability | DOD (Custom Products) | |||||
MMIC** Technologies | Trusted Certification Costs | U.S. Government Agencies - excluding DOD COTS standard Products) | |||||
Mixed Signal Technologies | Rising Commercial Orders | ||||||
Processors | Rising US Government Orders | ||||||
Nonvolatile Memory | Design Difficulty | ||||||
3-D Nonvolatile Memory | |||||||
SRAM | |||||||
DRAM - DDR3 | |||||||
DRAM - DDR4 | |||||||
IR*-Focal Plane Arrays | |||||||
Anti-Tamper Technology | |||||||
Display Electronics | |||||||
MEMS Technologies | |||||||
Optical/Photonic Technologies | |||||||
RF Technologies | |||||||
Other [Write In] | |||||||
Comments: | |||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||||||||||||
Section 9: | Manufacturing Equipment Suppliers | ||||||||||||||||||
For each of the listed processes, identify those used by your organization by 1) Writing in principal equipment type 2) Primary practice for maintaining equipment and 3) your organization's three primary suppliers of that equipment. If you only have one supplier, enter "None" for suppliers two and three. A blank response will be counted as "no capability." | |||||||||||||||||||
Integrated Circuit Manufacturing Processes - Front to Back |
Primary Equipment Suppliers - By Process |
||||||||||||||||||
(Select all that apply -- A blank response is counted as "No Capability") | |||||||||||||||||||
Type of Equipment #1 | Type of Equipment #2 | Type of Equipment #3 | Primary Company Practice - Equipment Maintenance Performed By: | Equipment Supplier #1 |
City | State | Country | Single or Sole Source Suppler | Equipment Supplier #2 |
City | State | Country | Single or Sole Source Suppler | Equipment Supplier #3 |
City | State | Country | Single or Sole Source Suppler | |
Wet Wafer Cleaning | Write In | Company employees | |||||||||||||||||
Piranha solution | Manufacturer | ||||||||||||||||||
RCA clean | OEM Distributor | ||||||||||||||||||
Photolithography | Third-Party Contractor | ||||||||||||||||||
Ion implantation | |||||||||||||||||||
Dry etching | |||||||||||||||||||
Wet etching | |||||||||||||||||||
Plasma strip/Ashing | |||||||||||||||||||
Thermal treatments Rapid thermal anneal | |||||||||||||||||||
Furnace anneals | |||||||||||||||||||
Furnace Thermal oxidation | |||||||||||||||||||
Rapid thermal oxidation | |||||||||||||||||||
Epitaxy | |||||||||||||||||||
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) | |||||||||||||||||||
Plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) | |||||||||||||||||||
Rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition | |||||||||||||||||||
Physical vapor deposition (PVD) | |||||||||||||||||||
Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) | |||||||||||||||||||
Electrochemical deposition (ECD) | |||||||||||||||||||
Chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) | |||||||||||||||||||
Inline monitor testing at wafer level [interstitial/ silver /kerf structures] |
|||||||||||||||||||
Wafer bumping (flip chip products only) | |||||||||||||||||||
Through silicon via (TSV), back side thinning and backside metal redistribution [if a 3-D chip] |
|||||||||||||||||||
Wafer functional test (testing of design structures) | |||||||||||||||||||
Wafer backgrinding (Smartcard, PCMCIA cards, other applications) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Die preparation Wafer mounting / Tape | |||||||||||||||||||
Die cutting/dicing | |||||||||||||||||||
IC packaging Die attachment/bonding | |||||||||||||||||||
IC bonding Wire bonding (if wirebond product) | |||||||||||||||||||
Thermosonic bonding | |||||||||||||||||||
Wafer bonding (if a wafer level bonded assembly) | |||||||||||||||||||
Tape Automated Bonding (TAB) | |||||||||||||||||||
IC encapsulation Baking | |||||||||||||||||||
Plating | |||||||||||||||||||
Laser marking | |||||||||||||||||||
Trim and form | |||||||||||||||||||
IC testing | |||||||||||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||
FACILITY LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||
Section 10 Employment | ||||||||||||
A. | Indicate the primary Integrated Circuit business line that accounts for the majority of FTE Employees and Contractors at this facililty: | Design/Manufacture/Package, Test, and Assembly | ||||||||||
B. | Record the total number of full time equivalent (FTE) employees BY FACILITY in your U.S./domestic operations by labor type for calendar years 2013-2016. Do not double count personnel who may perform cross-operational roles. | |||||||||||
Reporting Schedule: | Calendar Year/Fiscal Year | |||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||
1 | FTE Employees | |||||||||||
2 | FTE Contractors | |||||||||||
3 | Number of US Citizens | |||||||||||
4 | Number of non-US Citizens | |||||||||||
C. | List the top five countries (other than the U.S.) from which your location has non-U.S. citizen workers (employees or contractors), and identify the number of each type of visa or green card holder associated with each country. | |||||||||||
Country | H-1B | H-2B | F-1 | Green Card | Total (Auto Sum) | |||||||
# | # | # | # | |||||||||
C. | List the number of staff located at this facility working in the positions listed below that support Integrated Circuit design or Integrated Circuit product manufacturing (fabrication). Blanks will be interpreted as meaning that there are no personnel on site at this facility performing the listed job function. | |||||||||||
Occupational Category - Design of Integrated Circuits |
Number of Staff | Occupational Category - Manufacture of Integrated Circuits |
Number of Staff | Occupational Category - Manufacture of Integrated Circuits |
Number of Staff | |||||||
Silicon Design Architect | Environmental Engineering | Engineering Manager | ||||||||||
Researcher | Safety Engineer | Manufacturing Manager | ||||||||||
Quality Engineers | Planning/Procurement/Supply Chain | Facilities Engineering/Technician | ||||||||||
Pre Silicon Validation Engineer | Statistician | Shift Manager | ||||||||||
Post Silicon Validation Engineer | Process Engineer/Technician | Failure Analysis Engineer | ||||||||||
Layout Engineer | Product Engineer | Integration Engineer | ||||||||||
Debug Engineer | Reticle Engineer | Automation Engineer/Technician | ||||||||||
Electronic Engineer | Manufacturing Technician | Factory Manager | ||||||||||
RF/Analog Engineer | Equipment Engineer | Yield Engineer | ||||||||||
Integration Engineer | Industrial Engineer | |||||||||||
CAD Engineer | ||||||||||||
Thermal Engineer | ||||||||||||
Mechanical Engineer | ||||||||||||
Packaging Engineer | ||||||||||||
Program Manager | ||||||||||||
D. | State 1) the average age of the staff working at this location; and 2) the percentage of this staff that is projected to leave or retire in the next five years. |
Type of Integrated Circuit Facility | Design/Manufacturing | Average Age |
# | % Projected to leave or retire in next five years |
% | |||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||
Section 11: Sales | ||||||||
For years 2013-2016 provide your organization's U.S. and non-U.S. sales information. For 2017, project whether your sales will increase, decrease or remain unchanged. | ||||||||
Reporting Schedule: | Calendar Year/Fiscal Year | |||||||
Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017* | |||
A. | Total Sales, all Customers (in $) | |||||||
B. | Total IC-Related Sales, all Customers U.S./Non-U.S. ( in $) | |||||||
C. | Total U.S. IC-Related Sales - as a % of B | |||||||
D. | Total Non-U.S. IC-Related Sales - as a % of B | |||||||
E. | Direct sales of Custom IC Products (including design services) to U.S. Government customers (in $) | |||||||
F. | Is your organization dependent of U.S. Government sales for its ongoing viability? | Yes/No | ||||||
G. | Identify your organization's 1) top five commercial customers, their country location, and estimated revenue from them for 2016; 2) state the primary type of IC product supplied (IC designs or fabricated product) sold to them and the estimated revenue for 2016 attributed to the primary product; and 3) indicate whether the products were supplied under DMEA Trusted Access certification. | |||||||
Top 5 Commercial Customers by Revenue ($) | ||||||||
Commercial End Customer Name | Country | Estimated 2016 Revenue - All Product Sales | Prime Product Type (Based on Revenue) |
Estimated 2016 Revenue -Primary Product |
DMEA Trusted Program |
|||
Drop-Down of 23 Product Classes | Yes/No | |||||||
H. | Identify your organization's 1) top five U.S. Government customers, the associated federal agency, and estimated revenue from them for 2016; 2) state the primary type of IC product supplied (IC designs or fabricated product) sold to them and the estimated revenue for 2016 attributed to the primary product; and 3) indicate whether the products were supplied under DMEA Trusted Access certification. | |||||||
Top 5 U.S. Government Customers for Custom Products (Non-COTS) by Revenue ($) | ||||||||
Government End Customer Name | Federal Agency | Estimated 2016 Revenue - All Product Sales | Prime Product Type (Based on Revenue) |
Estimated 2016 Revenue -Primary Product |
DMEA Trusted Program |
|||
Drop-Down of 23 Product Classes | Yes/No | |||||||
Comments: | ||||||||
Disclosure of financial information is required for both public and private companies. All financial data is treated as Business Proprietary and exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Providing BIS with financial information will not result in the public release of you organization’s financial data. | ||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||
Section 12: Financials | |||||||
Provide the following Income Statement and Balance Sheet financial line items for your organization for years 2013-2016 below. Furnish full-year estimates for 2016. | |||||||
Reporting Schedule: | (Fiscal Year/Calendar Year) | ||||||
Income Statement (Select Line Items) | Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 | ||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||
A. | Net Sales (and other revenue) | ||||||
B. | Cost of Goods Sold | ||||||
C. | Total Operating Income (Loss) | ||||||
D. | Earnings Before Interest and Taxes | ||||||
E. | Net Income | ||||||
Source of Balance Sheet Items: | (Corporate/Whole Organization) | ||||||
Reporting Schedule: | (Fiscal Year/Calendar Year) | ||||||
Balance Sheet (Select Line Items) | Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 | ||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||
A. | Cash | ||||||
B. | Inventories | ||||||
C. | Current Assets | ||||||
D. | Total Assets | ||||||
E. | Current Liabilities | ||||||
F. | Total Liabilities | ||||||
Comments: | |||||||
Disclosure of financial information is required for both public and private companies. All financial data is treated as Business Proprietary and exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Providing BIS with financial information will not result in the public release of you organization’s financial data. | |||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act | |||||||
Reporting of Significant One-Time Events | |||||||
Year | Instruction: Provide an explanation of any significant one-time events that would skew assessments of the economic performance of your organization. | ||||||
2013 | |||||||
2014 | |||||||
2015 | |||||||
2016 |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||||||
Section 13: Acquisitions, Divestitures, Mergers and Joint Ventures | ||||||||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||||||
A. | Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Mergers | |||||||||||||||||
How many Integrated Circuit-related acquisitions, divestitures and mergers has your organization been party to since 2013? | If none, a "0" must be placed in the box. | |||||||||||||||||
Identify your organization's five most recent Integrated Circuit-related acquisitions, divestitures and mergers, going back no more than five years. Identify the primary objective of each event listed and provide a description. | ||||||||||||||||||
Organization Name | Type of Activity | Country | Year | Primary Objective | Explain (optional | <---- Primary Objective Dropdown | ||||||||||||
1 | Acquisition | Access to government contracts | Market Access | |||||||||||||||
2 | Divestiture | Access to intellectual property | R&D access/coordination | |||||||||||||||
3 | Merger | Bankruptcy restructuring | Reduce costs | |||||||||||||||
4 | Broaden customer base | Regulatory | ||||||||||||||||
5 | Develop new capabilities | Tax-related | ||||||||||||||||
B. | Joint Ventures | Expand Product Lines | Vertical integration | |||||||||||||||
How many Integrated Circuit-related joint ventures does your organization currently participate in? | If none, a "0" must be placed in the box. | Other objective (Explain) | ||||||||||||||||
Identify your organization's current Integrated Circuit-related joint venture relationships, including public/private R&D partnerships. Select the primary objective of the joint venture and provide a description. | ||||||||||||||||||
Organization Name | Country | Year | Primary Objective | Explain (optional | <---- Primary Objective Dropdown | |||||||||||||
1 | Cost Reduction | Market Access | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Access to technology | Product Improvements | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Other | Risk sharing | ||||||||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | ||||||||||||||||||
C. | 1 | Have any non-U.S. governments (including sovereign wealth funds) invested, directly or indirectly, in your organization - and collectively control five percent or more of stockholder voting shares? | Yes - Directly/Yes - Indirectly/No | |||||||||||||||
If you answered "yes" explain in the space below the nature of the investment and identify the non-U.S. government(s). | ||||||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||
Section 14: Capital Expenditures | ||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||
A. | Did your organization track capital expenditure financials between 2013 and 2016? | If not, enter "0" in section B | ||||||||||
Capital Expenditure Reporting Schedule: | Calendar Year/Fiscal Year | |||||||||||
B. | Capital Expenditure Category | Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 | ||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||
U.S. | Non-U.S. | U.S. | Non-U.S. | U.S. | Non-U.S. | U.S. | Non-U.S. | |||||
1 | Total Capital Expenditures | |||||||||||
2 | Total Integrated Circuit-related Capital Expenditures | |||||||||||
3 | Machinery and Equipment [as a % of row 1] | |||||||||||
4 | IT, Computers, Software [as a % of row 1] | |||||||||||
5 | Land, Buildings, and Leasehold Improvements [as a % of row 1] | |||||||||||
6 | Other [Write In] | |||||||||||
Lines 1 through 4 must total 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||||
C. | From 2013-2016, what was the most significant factor in dictating your organization's Capital Expenditures? | |||||||||||
Explain: | ||||||||||||
D. | Rank your organization's top 3 capital expenditure priorities for 2013-2016, anticipated priorities for 2017-2021, and provide a brief description. | |||||||||||
Priority | 2013-2016 | 2017-2021 | Description | |||||||||
1 | Replace old machinery and equipment | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
2 | Improve productivity | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
3 | Expand capacity | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
4 | Add new capability | |||||||||||
5 | Upgrade technology | |||||||||||
6 | Meet specific customer requirements | |||||||||||
7 | Other [Write In] | |||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||||
Section 15: Research & Development | |||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||||
A. | Does your organization perform Research and Development (R&D)? | Yes/No | If not, proceed to section 16 | ||||||||
In Question B, record your organization's total R&D dollar expenditures for years 2013 - 2016. In Question C, identify your organization's R&D funding sources, by percent of total R&D dollars sourced. Note: Total annual funding sources reported (section C) can exceed total expenditures reported (section B) for a given year. |
|||||||||||
Reporting Schedule: | Calendar Year/Fiscal Year | ||||||||||
B. | Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 | ||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||
1 | Total R&D Expenditures | $ | Data Confirmation | ||||||||
2 | Basic Research (as a percent of B1) | % | Total 2016 R&D Expenditures | ||||||||
3 | Applied Research (as a percent of B1) | % | |||||||||
4 | Product/Process Development (as a percent of B1) | % | None | ||||||||
5 | Total of 2 - 4 (must equal 100%) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
C. | Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 | ||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||
1 | Total R&D Funding Sources | $ | |||||||||
2 | Parent Company (Internal) | % | |||||||||
3 | Total Federal Government | % | |||||||||
4 | State and Local Government | % | |||||||||
5 | U.S. Private Entity [includes industry, universities] | % | |||||||||
6 | Foreign Investors [includes industry, governments] | % | |||||||||
8 | Other | (specify here) | % | ||||||||
9 | Total of 2 - 8 (must equal 100%) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
D. | 1) Report the percentages of your organization's total annual R&D expenditures for supporting Integrated Circuit product design and manufacturing activity performed in U.S. and Non-U.S. locations for 2013-2016 | ||||||||||
R&D Expenditures For Integrated Circuit Design and/or Manufacturing (Corporate or Integrated Circuit Business Unit) |
|||||||||||
Total Integrated Circuit-Related R&D Expenditures | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||
Percent Performed at All U.S. Locations | % | ||||||||||
Percent Performed at All Non-U.S. Locations | % | ||||||||||
Total Integrated Circuit R&D Expenditures | $ | ||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||||
Section 16a - Export Regulation & Trade Issues: Regulatory Impacts | |||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||||
A. | Identify the Integrated Circuit-related products that your organization exports: | IC Designs | Yes/No | ||||||||
Partially Built ICs | Yes/No | ||||||||||
Complete IC Products | Yes/No | ||||||||||
B. | Do you utilize the U.S. export control system (Export Administration Regulations [EAR]/Commerce Control List [CCL]), or (International Traffic in Arms Regulations [ITAR]/U.S. Munitions List [USML]) for the export of Integrated Circuit-related products and services (including design services and manufacturing)? | EAR/CCL | Yes/No | ||||||||
ITAR/USML | Yes/No | ||||||||||
If you do not utilize U.S. export control licenses for Integrated Circuit -related products or services, select "No" in the box and proceed to Section 17. | Yes/No | ||||||||||
C. | Has your organization lost export sales opportunities of Integrated Circuit-related products or services to non-U.S. competitors because of U.S. export controls (EAR/CCL or ITAR/USML)? If "Yes," select the total dollar amount of lost export sales opportunities from 2013-2016. | Lost Sales?* | Lost Export Sales Estimate | ||||||||
EAR/CCL | Yes/No | $ | |||||||||
ITAR/USML | Yes/No | $ | |||||||||
*Lost Sales: Are attributed to binding, written supply contracts (not estimates) of a stated dollar value that could not be fulfilled because a review of export regulations determined that the Integrated Circuit-related products (designs, technology, and or manufactured devices) could not be exported to a designated customer or country. | |||||||||||
D. | State whether U.S. export control regulations since 2013 directly affected your organization’s Integrated Circuit business in any of the ways listed below. If "Yes," explain in the box provided at right. | ||||||||||
Impact | Response | Explanation | |||||||||
1 | Altered your organization's Integrated Circuit-related research and development program | Y/N | |||||||||
2 | Avoided the export of products or services that are subject to EAR/CCL or ITAR/USML related controls. | EAR/CCL | |||||||||
ITAR/USML | |||||||||||
Both | |||||||||||
N/A | |||||||||||
3 | Altered the composition of specific Integrated Circuit-related business lines | EAR/CCL | |||||||||
ITAR/USML | |||||||||||
Both | |||||||||||
N/A | |||||||||||
4 | Located or relocated Integrated Circuit-related facilities outside the United States due to regulatory burdens. | EAR/CCL | |||||||||
ITAR/USML | |||||||||||
Both | |||||||||||
N/A | |||||||||||
5 | Non-U.S. organization's avoided buying U.S.-origin Integrated Circuit-related products or services. | Y/N | |||||||||
6 | Spurred non-U.S. organizations to offer "ITAR/USML-free" or "EAR/CCL-free" Integrated Circuit-related products or services. | Y/N | |||||||||
E. | State whether reforms in export control regulations (EAR/CCL and ITAR/USML) have affected your Integrated Circuit business: | Yes/No | |||||||||
F. | For the two technologies listed below, identify how reforms in export control have affected your Integrated Circuit product business by: 1) Selecting the top three regulatory impacts from the list below; 2) indicating from the list provided how export control reforms may have changed the range of companies and number of companies your organizations does business with as well as your overall business volume. | ||||||||||
Impacts of Export Control Reforms | |||||||||||
Technology | Regulatory Impacts | Range of Trading Companies | Number of Trading Countries |
Business Volume | |||||||
Impact #1 | Impact #2 | Impact #3 | |||||||||
Microwave Monolithic Integrated Circuits | Reduced Paperwork | Wider business opportunities | Other #1 | Increase | Increase | Increase | |||||
Increased Paperwork | Fewer business opportunities | Decrease | Decrease | Decrease | |||||||
Transmit/Receive Modules | Reduced Licensing Time | Removed some controls | Other # 2 | No Change | No Change | No Change | |||||
Increased Licensing Time | Added some controls | Other | |||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||
Section 17a - Trade and Intellectual Property Issues | |||||||||
From the list below, identify the methods your organization uses to transfer Integrated Circuit-related design and manufacturing intellectual property on a legal, authorized basis to U.S. and non-U.S. destinations. | |||||||||
A | Methods | US Location(s) | Non-U.S. Location(s) | Design IP or Manufacturing IP | |||||
1 | Licensing Intellectual Property | Yes/No | Yes/No | Design IP | |||||
2 | Joint Ventures | Manufacturing IP | |||||||
3 | Research collaborations | Both | |||||||
4 | Participation in scientific/technical conferences | ||||||||
5 | Information provided to potential investors | ||||||||
6 | Debt Financing | ||||||||
7 | Non-Disclosure Agreements | ||||||||
8 | Other [Write in] | ||||||||
From the list below, identify the methods by which unauthorized transfers of your company’s Integrated Circuit-related design and manufacturing intellectual property have occurred. If yes, identify the types of IP. | |||||||||
B | Methods | US Location(s) | Non-U.S. Location(s) | Design IP or Manufacturing IP | |||||
1 | Cyber security intrusions | Yes/No | Yes/No | Design IP | |||||
2 | Planting staff in your company | Manufacturing IP | |||||||
3 | Physical break-ins at company facilities | Both | |||||||
4 | Business partners | ||||||||
5 | Dumpster Diving | ||||||||
6 | Former employees | ||||||||
7 | Employees | ||||||||
8 | External IT System Contractors | ||||||||
9 | Persons performing R&D with your company | ||||||||
10 | Company campus Wi-Fi Network Interceptions | ||||||||
11 | Persons speaking to outside industry analysts/experts | ||||||||
12 | Persons speaking with your bankers/financiers | ||||||||
13 | Persons speaking with contractors and suppliers | ||||||||
14 | Violation of Non-Disclosure Agreements | ||||||||
15 | Other [Write in] | ||||||||
C | 1 | In the years 2013-2016, did your organization experience unauthorized transfers of Integrated Circuit-related design and/or manufacturing Intellectual Property? | Type of IP | ||||||
Design/Manufacturing/Both/Neither | |||||||||
2 | If “Yes,” report the number of instances this occured for Design IP and Manufacturing IP? | Design IP | Manufacturing IP | ||||||
3 | Does your company know the country location(s) of the most frequent perpetrators of the unauthorized transfers of your company’s Integrated Circuit-related intellectual property? If “Yes” identify the countries. | Yes/No | Country | Country | |||||
4 | Was the intellectual property subject to any the following export control regulations: | CCL/EAR | Yes/No/Not applicable | Yes/No/Not applicable | |||||
USML/ITAR | |||||||||
5 | Did your organization report the incident(s) to the: | U.S. Department of Defense | Yes/No | ||||||
U.S. Department of Commerce | |||||||||
U.S. Department of State | |||||||||
Federal Bureau of Investigation | |||||||||
State/Local police authorities | |||||||||
U.S. Department of Energy | |||||||||
Other [Write In] | |||||||||
6 | In the past five years has your organization experienced a loss of access to critical Integrated Circuit-related Intellectual Property? | Yes/No/Not applicable | |||||||
Comments: | |||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | ||||||||||||
Section 17b: Trade and Intellectual Property Issues | ||||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | ||||||||||||||
Identify all trade practices and requirements that your organization has encountered at any time since 2013 in countries where it currently conducts business or seeks to do business directly or indirectly through third parties. Then, identify up to three countries where these practices or requirements have been encountered and whether they persist to date. | ||||||||||||||
Trade Practices | Yes/No | Country #1 | Persists Today? | Country #2 | Persists Today? | Country #3 | Persists Today? | |||||||
Tariffs on the Integrated Circuit-related products and services that your organization sells | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||
National trade policy to phase out the use of Integrated Circuit-related products designed or made outside of their country | No | No | No | |||||||||||
Threats to boycott your organization’s products unless your organization allows substantial investment by entities from that country | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Manipulation of your organization's publicly traded stock as a consequence of refusing to transfer intellectual property or establish design and/or manufacturing operations in that country | ||||||||||||||
Denied timely access to the country’s market | ||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||
Conditional Trade Requirements | Yes/No | Country #1 | Persists Today? | Country #2 | Persists Today? | Country #3 | Persists Today? | |||||||
Transfer of Integrated Circuit-related device intellectual property (trade secrets, patents, etc.) | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||
Transfer of Integrated Circuit-related manufacturing process intellectual property (trade secrets, patents, etc.) | No | No | No | |||||||||||
Outsource design of Integrated Circuit-related products to their country | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Establish Integrated Circuit-related design operations in their country | ||||||||||||||
Outsource the manufacture of Integrated Circuit-related products to their country | ||||||||||||||
Establish Integrated Circuit-related manufacturing operations in their country | ||||||||||||||
Required investment/equity from non-US companies in order to maintain market access | ||||||||||||||
Mandatory joint ventures as means to achieve transfers on design and/or manufacturing intellectual property and know-how | ||||||||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||||||
Section 18: Competitiveness | |||||||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||||||
A. | Rank your organization's top five issues affecting the long-term competitiveness of your organization and provide an explanation. | ||||||||||||
Issue | 2013-2016 | 2017-2021 | Explanation (optional): | ||||||||||
Aging equipment, facilities, or infrastructure | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Aging workforce | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
Competition - domestic | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
Competition - foreign | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
Counterfeit parts | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||
Cybersecurity | |||||||||||||
Environmental regulations/remediation - U.S. | |||||||||||||
Environmental regulations/remediation - non-U.S. | |||||||||||||
Export controls; ITAR/USML; EAR/CCL | |||||||||||||
Forced localization | |||||||||||||
Government acquisition processes | |||||||||||||
Government purchasing volatility | |||||||||||||
Government regulatory burden | |||||||||||||
Healthcare costs | |||||||||||||
Health and safety regulations | |||||||||||||
Imports | |||||||||||||
Industrial Espionage | |||||||||||||
Intellectual property/patent infringement | |||||||||||||
Labor availability/costs | |||||||||||||
Material input availability | |||||||||||||
Product obsolescence | |||||||||||||
Pension costs | |||||||||||||
Proximity to customers | |||||||||||||
Proximity to suppliers | |||||||||||||
R&D costs | |||||||||||||
Reduction in commercial demand | |||||||||||||
Reduction in USG demand | |||||||||||||
Taxes | |||||||||||||
Worker/skills retention | |||||||||||||
Other | (specify) | ||||||||||||
Other | (specify) | ||||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page | |||||||||
CORPORATE LEVEL RESPONSE | |||||||||||
Section 19: Cyber Security | |||||||||||
A. | Estimate your organization's spending on physical and cyber security, in thousands of dollars, and state the number of security incidents your organization has recorded in each year. | ||||||||||
Reporting Schedule: | |||||||||||
Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 | |||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016* | ||||||||
Incidents | Expenditures | Incidents | Expenditures | Incidents | Expenditures | Incidents | Expenditures | ||||
1 | Cyber Security | # | $ | # | $ | # | $ | # | $ | ||
2 | Physical Security | # | $ | # | $ | # | $ | # | $ | ||
* Furnish full year estimates for 2016 if data is unavailable. | |||||||||||
B. | 1 | Is your organization aware of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204-7009, Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information? http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252204.htm |
Yes/No | ||||||||
Explain: | |||||||||||
2 | Who is responsible for administering your organization's internal computer network(s)? | Dropdown | |||||||||
3 | Who is responsible for administering your organization's external computer network(s)? | Dropdown | |||||||||
C. | 1 | Is the computer or computer network that houses your organization's Commercially Sensitive Information (CSI) connected to the Internet, either directly or via an intermediary network or server? *This includes customer/client information, financial information and records, human resources information, intellectual property information, internal communications, manufacturing and production line information, patent and trademark information, research and development information, regulatory/compliance information, and supplier/supply chain information. |
Yes/No | ||||||||
2 | Does your organization either restrict or prohibit your external cloud service or external data storage provider(s) from storing Commercially Sensitive Information (CSI) outside of the U.S.? | External Cloud Service Providers | Restrict/Prohibit/No/Unknown | ||||||||
External Data Storage Providers | Restrict/Prohibit/No/Unknown | ||||||||||
Estimate the percentage of your organization's Commercially Sensitive Information (CSI) that is stored with: | External Cloud Service Providers | (% Entry Only) | |||||||||
External Data Storage Providers | (% Entry Only) | ||||||||||
3 | Does your organization use the following cloud-based security protocols? | Advanced authentication (biometrics, tokens etc.) | <Yes/No> | End-point protection | <Yes/No> | Identity and access management | <Yes/No> | ||||
Real-time monitoring/analytics | <Yes/No> | Threat intelligence | <Yes/No> | Other (specify) | <Yes/No> | ||||||
Explain: | |||||||||||
4 | Does your organization have structured methods for protecting the following types of Commercially Sensitive Information (see definitions)? | <Yes/No/Not Applicable> | Explain | ||||||||
Customer/client information | |||||||||||
Financial information and records | |||||||||||
Human resources information/employee data | |||||||||||
Information subject to export control regulations (EAR and/or ITAR) | |||||||||||
Intellectual property related information | |||||||||||
Internal communications including negotiation points, merger and acquisition plans, and/or corporate strategy | |||||||||||
Manufacturing and production line information | |||||||||||
Patent and trademark information | |||||||||||
Regulatory/compliance Information | |||||||||||
Research and development (R&D) related information | |||||||||||
Supply chain and sourcing information | |||||||||||
Other (specify) | |||||||||||
D. | Using the drop-down lists and free-text entries below, indicate the type(s) and severity of any cybersecurity events that have occurred at this organization from 2013-2016. | ||||||||||
Event | Impact Level | Frequency | Explain (incident and follow-up) | ||||||||
1 | (Choose from Drop-Down) | Severe | # | Write in | |||||||
2 | (Choose from Drop-Down) | Moderate | |||||||||
3 | (Choose from Drop-Down) | Low | |||||||||
4 | Other Cybersecurity Event | (Specify) | None | ||||||||
5 | Other Cybersecurity Event | (Specify) | |||||||||
Note: The FBI encourages recipients to report information concerning suspicious or criminal activity to their local FBI field office or the FBI's 24/7 Cyber Watch (CyWatch). Field office contacts can be identified at http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field. CyWatch can be contacted by phone at 855-292-3937 or e-mail at [email protected]. When available, each report submitted should include the date, time, location, type of activity, number of people, and type of equipment used for the activity, the name of the submitting organization, and a designated point of contact. | |||||||||||
Comments: | |||||||||||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act | |||||||||||
Part B, 2 &3: Dropdown: | Part D: Event Dropdown: | ||||||||||
Internal IT Department | Business interruption | ||||||||||
Internal IT department and external U.S. service provider | Exfiltration of CSI data | ||||||||||
Internal IT Department and external non-U.S. service provider | Theft of personnel information | ||||||||||
Only U.S. external service provider | Damage to software and/or source code | ||||||||||
Only non-U.S. external service provider | User idle time and lost productivity because of downtime or systems performance delays | ||||||||||
Both U.S. and non-U.S. service providers | Disruption to normal operations because of system availability problems | ||||||||||
Not Applicable | Damage or theft of IT assets and infrastructure | ||||||||||
Incurred cost of damage assessment and remediation | |||||||||||
Theft of software and/or source code | |||||||||||
Damage to company production capabilities or systems | |||||||||||
Destruction of information asset | |||||||||||
Reputation loss, market share, and brand damages | |||||||||||
Ransomware Attack | |||||||||||
Other |
Previous Page | Return to Table of Contents | |
Section 20: Certification | ||
The undersigned certifies that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. It is a criminal offense to willfully make a false statement or representation to any department or agency of the United States Government as to any matter within its jurisdiction (18 U.S.C.A. 1001 (1984 & SUPP. 1197)). Once this survey is complete, submit it via e-mail to: [email protected]. Be sure to retain a copy for your records and to facilitate any necessary edits or clarifications. |
||
Organization Name | ||
Organization's Internet Address | ||
Name of Authorizing Official | ||
Title of Authorizing Official | ||
E-mail Address | ||
Phone Number and Extension | ||
Date Certified | ||
In the box below, provide any additional comments or any other information you wish to include regarding this survey assessment. | ||
How many hours did it take to complete this survey? | ||
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |