30-Day FR Notice

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Notices
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2012–0057.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact: Robert H.
Squibb, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7815, or
by email to: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC has
submitted the following currently
approved collection of information to
OMB for extension:
Title: Requirements for Electrically
Operated Toys.
OMB Number: 3041–0035.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers and
importers of electrically operated toys
and other electrically operated articles.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 40
firms that manufacture or import
electrically operated toys and other
electrically operated articles have been
identified; based on manufacturer and
importer records for sales and
distribution of inventory, there are
approximately 10 models each year per
firm for which testing and
recordkeeping is required resulting in
400 records (40 firms × 10 models) per
year.
Estimated Time per Response: Based
on discussion with a trade association
for the toy industry, we estimate that the
tests required by the regulations can be
performed on one model in 16 hours
and that four hours of recordkeeping is
required per model. In addition, each
firm may spend 30 minutes or less per
model on labeling requirements.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
6,400 hours for testing burden (16 hours
× 400 records); 1,600 hours for
recordkeeping (4 hours × 400 records);
200 hours for labeling (40 firms × 1⁄2
hour × 10 models) for a total annual
burden of 8,200 hours per year.
General Description of Collection: The
regulations in 16 CFR part 1505
establish performance and labeling
requirements for electrically operated
toys and children’s articles to reduce
unreasonable risks of injury to children
from electric shock, electrical burns,
and thermal burns associated with those
products. Manufacturers and importers
of electrically operated toys and
children’s articles are required to
maintain records for three years on: (1)
Material and production specifications;
(2) the quality assurance program used;
(3) results of all tests and inspections
conducted; and (4) sales and
distribution of electrically operated toys
and children’s articles.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:06 Feb 22, 2016

Jkt 238001

Dated: February 18, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–03701 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0058]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request—Safety
Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn
Mowers
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’) of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the Consumer
Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CPSC’’) announces
that the Commission has submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of
approval of a collection of information
relating to testing and recordkeeping
requirements in the Safety Standard for
Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers (16
CFR part 1205), approved previously
under OMB Control No. 3041–0091. In
the Federal Register of November 25,
2015 (80 FR 73735), the CPSC published
a notice to announce the agency’s
intention to seek extension of approval
of the collection of information.
One commenter, Outdoor Power
Equipment Institute (‘‘OPEI’’) stated that
the estimated burden is underestimated
as it is likely based on an outdated
estimate of the U.S. market. According
to OPEI data, accounting for 8 member
manufacturers, 4.7 million walk-behind
(gas) power lawn mowers were shipped
in the U.S. during 2015.
CPSC staff’s estimate of the estimated
reporting burden to industry to comply
with the safety standard mainly is tied
to the number of manufacturers and
importers (25), number of production
days in a year (130), and employee time
per day per establishment required to
conduct a reasonable testing program (3
hours) and preparation of product labels
(1 hour). The information provided by
OPEI’s comment does not address the
factors and assumptions leading to
estimated burden hours for firms and
the industry. The reported shipments of
4.7 million units in 2015 (by 8 OPEI
members) would not lead us to
conclude that estimated burden hours
has been underestimated. In fact, the

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00049

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

8943

reported shipments in 2015 are lower
than previous years in our possession
(e.g., 6.5 million forecast for 2005). If
OPEI has information related to the
number of affected establishments,
annual production days, and hours per
production day required for testing and
labeling, staff will review that
information and revise the estimated
information collection burden of the
standard, as necessary.
Accordingly, by publication of this
notice, the Commission announces that
CPSC has submitted to the OMB a
request for extension of approval of that
collection of information, without
change.
Written comments on this
request for extension of approval of
information collection requirements
should be submitted by March 24, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
[email protected] or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503. In addition, written comments
that are sent to OMB also should be
submitted electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2012–0058.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7815, or by email to: rsquibb@
cpsc.gov.
DATES:

CPSC has
submitted the following currently
approved collection of information to
OMB for extension:
Title: Safety Standard for WalkBehind Power Lawn Mowers.
OMB Number: 3041–0091.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers and
importers of walk-behind power lawn
mowers.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 25
manufacturers and importers of walkbehind power lawn mowers have been
identified.
Estimated Time per Response: Walkbehind power lawn mowers are
manufactured seasonally to meet
demand. They are manufactured during
an estimated 130 days out of the year.
When they are manufactured, firms are
required to test and maintain records of
those tests. Three hours daily is
estimated for testing and recordkeeping

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM

23FEN1

8944

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Notices

per firm totaling 390 hours per firm (3
hours × 130 days). In addition, to
produce labels and apply labels on the
newly manufactured lawn mowers, one
hour daily is estimated for each firm
during the production cycle for a total
of 130 hours per firm (1 hour × 130
days).
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
9,750 hours on testing and
recordkeeping (25 firms × 390 hours)
and 3,250 hours for labeling (25 firms ×
130 hours) for a total annual burden of
13,000 hours per year.
General Description of Collection: In
1979, the Commission issued the Safety
Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn
Mowers (16 CFR part 1205) to address
blade contact injuries. Subpart B of the
standard sets forth regulations
prescribing requirements for a
reasonable testing program to support
certificates of compliance with the
standard for walk-behind power lawn
mowers. 16 CFR part 1205, subpart B.
In addition, section 14(a) of the CPSA
(15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires
manufacturers, importers, and private
labelers of a consumer product subject
to a consumer product safety standard
to issue a certificate stating that the
product complies with all applicable
consumer product safety standards.
Section 14(a) of the CPSA also requires
that the certificate of compliance must
be based on a test of each product or
upon a reasonable testing program. The
information collection is necessary
because these regulations require
manufacturers and importers to
establish and maintain records to
demonstrate compliance with the
requirements for testing and labeling to
support the certification of compliance.
Dated: February 18, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–03700 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Charter Establishment of Department
of Defense Federal Advisory
Committees
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Establishment of Federal
Advisory Committee.
AGENCY:

The Department of Defense
(DoD) is publishing this notice to
announce that it is establishing the
charter for the Defense Advisory
Committee on Investigation,

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:06 Feb 22, 2016

Jkt 238001

Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual
Assault in the Armed Forces (‘‘the
Committee’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Freeman, Advisory Committee
Management Officer for the Department
of Defense, 703–692–5952.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
committee’s charter is being established
pursuant to section 546 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015 (FY 2015 NDAA), as modified
by section 537 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016
(FY2016 NDAA), and in accordance
with the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (FACA) of 1972 (5 U.S.C.,
Appendix, as amended) and 41 CFR
102–3.50(a). The Committee’s charter
and contact information for the
Committee’s Designated Federal Officer
(DFO) can be obtained at http://
www.facadatabase.gov/.
The Committee provides the Secretary
of Defense, through the General Counsel
of the Department of Defense, advice on
the investigation, prosecution, and
defense of allegations of rape, forcible
sodomy, sexual assault, and other
sexual misconduct involving members
of the Armed Forces. Not later than
March 30 of each year, the Committee
will submit a report describing the
results of its activities during the
preceding year to the Secretary of
Defense and the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and House of
Representatives.
The Committee will be composed of
no more than 20 members who have
experience with the investigation,
prosecution, and defense of allegations
of sexual assault offenses. Members may
include Federal and State prosecutors,
judges, law professors, and private
attorneys, but individuals serving on
active duty in the Armed Forces may
not be appointed to the Committee.
Members who are not full-time or
permanent part-time Federal officers or
employees will be appointed as experts
or consultants pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3109
to serve as special government
employee members. Members who are
full-time or permanent part-time Federal
officers or employees will serve as
regular government employee members.
All members are appointed to provide
advice on behalf of the Government on
the basis of their best judgment without
representing any particular point of
view and in a manner that is free from
conflict of interest. Except for
reimbursement of official Committeerelated travel and per diem, members
serve without compensation.
The DoD, as necessary and consistent
with the Committee’s mission and DoD

PO 00000

Frm 00050

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

policies and procedures, may establish
subcommittees, task forces, or working
groups to support the Committee, and
all subcommittees must operate under
the provisions of FACA and the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Subcommittees will not work
independently of the Committee and
must report all their recommendations
and advice solely to the Committee for
full deliberation and discussion.
Subcommittees, task forces, or working
groups have no authority to make
decisions and recommendations,
verbally or in writing, on behalf of the
Committee. No subcommittee or any of
its members can update or report,
verbally or in writing, directly to the
DoD or any Federal officers or
employees. The Committee’s DFO,
pursuant to DoD policy, must be a fulltime or permanent part-time DoD
employee. The DFO or a properly
approved Alternate DFO, is required to
be in attendance at all Committee/
subcommittee meetings for the duration
of each and every meeting. The public
or interested organizations may submit
written statements to Committee
membership about the Committee’s
mission and functions. Written
statements may be submitted at any
time or in response to the stated agenda
of planned meeting of the Committee.
All written statements shall be
submitted to the DFO for the
Committee, and this individual will
ensure that the written statements are
provided to the membership for their
consideration.
Dated: February 18, 2016.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2016–03749 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
[Docket ID: USA–2016–HQ–0003]

Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Department of the Army announces a
proposed public information collection
and seeks public comment on the
provisions thereof. Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM

23FEN1