Download:
pdf |
pdf73416
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 25, 2016 / Notices
‘‘Applying Quantitative Approaches to
the Formative Evaluation of Antismoking
Campaign Messages.’’ Social Marketing
Quarterly. 2013;19(4):242–64.
21. Thomas, V., K. Fowler, and P. Grimm,
‘‘Conceptualization and Exploration of
Attitude Toward Advertising Disclosures
and its Impact on Perceptions of
Manipulative Intent.’’ Journal of
Consumer Affairs. 2013;47(3):564–87.
22. Richins, M., ‘‘Measuring Emotions in the
Consumption Experience.’’ Journal of
Consumer Research. 1997;24:127–46.
23. Waytz, A., J. Cacioppo, and N. Epley,
‘‘Who Sees Human? The Stability and
Importance of Individual Differences in
Anthropomorphism.’’ Perspectives on
Psychological Science. 2010;5:216–32.
Dated: October 19, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–25727 Filed 10–24–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–AKR–GLBA–22231; PPWOBSADA0,
PPMPSAS1Y.Y00000 (177)]
Information Collection Request Sent to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; Glacier Bay
National Park and Preserve Bear
Sighting and Encounter Reports
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We (National Park Service,
NPS) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. We summarize the
ICR below and describe the nature of the
collection and the estimated burden and
cost. We may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. However, under OMB
regulations, we may continue to
conduct or sponsor this information
collection while it is pending at OMB.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before November 25, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and
suggestions on this information
collection to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior at OMB–
OIRA at (202) 395–5806 (fax) or OIRA_
[email protected] (email).
Please provide a copy of your comments
to Madonna L. Baucum, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, National
Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Mail Stop 242, Reston, VA 20192;
or [email protected] (email).
Please include ‘‘1024–GLBA’’ in the
subject line of your comments. You may
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Oct 24, 2016
Jkt 241001
review the ICR online at http://
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to review Department of the
Interior collections under review by
OMB.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Margaret Hazen,
Supervisory Park Ranger, Glacier Bay
National Park and Preserve at Margaret_
[email protected] (email) or at (907) 697–
2608 (telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The National Park Service Organic
Act, 54 U.S.C. 100101(a) et seq.),
requires that the NPS preserve national
parks for the enjoyment, education, and
inspiration of this and future
generations. Permit requirements and
restrictions for recreational activities in
the backcountry are governed in
accordance with the regulations found
at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations,
Sections 1.5, 1.6, and 2.10 (36 CFR 1.5,
1.6, 2.10, and 13.116). In order to
monitor resources and wildlife in the
Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve
(GLBA) and to enhance the safety of
future visitors, the park monitors all
sightings and interactions by visitors
with bears. The bear sighting and
encounter reporting forms are an
extension of our statutory authority and
responsibility to protect the park areas
we administer and to manage the public
use thereof. NPS regulations codified in
36 CFR 1–7, 12 and 13, are designated
to implement statutory mandates that
provide for resource protection and
public enjoyment.
Bear sighting data provides the park
with important data used to determine
bear movements, habitat use, and
species distribution. This information
can be used in backcountry management
and planning, field research planning,
and educational outreach for visitors.
Bear-human interaction data is vital to
understand how bears respond to
people, detecting changes in bear
behavior, and identifying potential areas
of high bear-human conflict. Obtaining
immediate information on bear-human
conflicts allows managers to respond
promptly to mitigate further conflicts.
Proactive mitigation includes notifying
other backcountry users, issuing
advisories or recommendations, or
issuing closures to prevent further
conflicts and maintain public safety.
Additionally, managers may respond to
reports of bear-human conflict with bear
management techniques such as hazing
or aversive conditioning. Obtaining
current accurate information on bear
sightings and interactions is essential
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for public safety and to effectively
manage bears and people to minimize
conflicts. Summary statistics (without
personal information) may be generated
to examine long-term trends in types
and locations of bear-human
interactions. Observations and
interactions by visitors are recorded via
the two forms: NPS Form 10–405 and
NPS Form 10–406.
The NPS requires the submission of
NPS Form 10–405 upon exiting the park
backcountry in order to collect
information regarding bear sightings
within GLBA. The collection and
timeliness of the data collection is
critical for the NPS’ ability to enhance
the safety of future visitors and to
protect the bear population at the park.
Information collected via NPS Form 10–
405 includes:
• Group name;
• Take-out date;
• Whether visitor encountered dirty
campsites left by previous users or
observe unsafe or inappropriate
behavior by other groups; and
• Detailed information for each
sighting documented on the form, to
include:
Æ Date/time;
Æ Species type
Æ Total number of bears seen together
(for each sighting);
Æ Bear unit type;
Æ Estimation of distance between
visitor and bear(s);
Æ Whether the bear was aware of the
group;
Æ Bear reaction to group;
Æ Activity of group;
Æ Number of observers; and
Æ Location description/campsite
name/GPS position/other comments.
Submission of a completed NPS Form
10–406 is required when a bear enters
camp, approaches the group, damages
gear, obtains food, and/or acts in an
aggressive or threatening manner
towards the group. The collection and
timeliness of data concerning bearhuman contact is critical for the NPS’
ability to enhance the safety of future
visitors and to protect the bear
population at the park. Information
collected via NPS Form 10–406
includes:
• Name and phone number of the
primary person involved in the
interaction;
• Group type: Park visitor, concession
employee, contractor, researcher, NPS
employee, or other;
• Number of people who encountered
the bear;
• Corresponding sighting number on
NPS Form 10–405; Location 1–28
(Backcountry vs. Developed Area A and
B);
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
73417
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 25, 2016 / Notices
• Types of vegetation in area of
encounter;
• The bear’s activity when it was first
observed;
• The group’s activity prior to seeing
the bear;
• The bear’s initial and subsequent
reaction to the group;
• Group’s response to bear’s reaction;
• Group’s distance to the bear;
• Whether food was present, and if
so, if it was eaten by the bear;
• Whether property was damaged;
• Detailed description of the
interaction;
• Detailed description of the bear, to
include color, markings, scars, tags, etc.;
• Date, time, and duration of
encounter;
• Exact location of encounter
documented on map provided by GLBA,
to include the latitude/longitude;
• Where did the individual learn
about how to behave while in bear
country; and
• Whether visitor encountered dirty
campsites left by previous users or
observe unsafe or inappropriate
behavior by other groups
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1024–New.
Estimated
annual number
of responses
Activity
Estimated
completion
time per
response
(minutes)
Estimated
total annual
burden hours
NPS Form 10–405, ‘‘Tatshenshini—Alsek River Bear Report Form 1’’ .....................................
NPS Form 10–406, ‘‘Tatshenshini—Alsek River Bear Information Management (BIM) Report
Form 2’’ ....................................................................................................................................
40
5
3
10
5
1
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
50
........................
4
III. Comments
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Title: Glacier Bay National Park and
Preserve Bear Sighting and Encounter
Reports.
Service Form Number(s): NPS Forms
10–405, ‘‘Tatshenshini—Alsek River
Bear Report’’ and 10–406, ‘‘Bear
Information Management Report’’.
Type of Request: Existing collection in
use without an OMB Control Number.
Description of Respondents:
Backcountry and frontcountry visitors to
Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden
Cost: None.
On June 26, 2015, we published in the
Federal Register (80 FR 36844) a Notice
of our intent to request that OMB
approve the collection of information
associated with the collection of
information via NPS Forms 10–405,
‘‘Tatshenshini—Alsek River Bear
Report’’ and 10–406, ‘‘Bear Information
Management Report’’. We did not
receive any comments in response to
that notice.
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Oct 24, 2016
Jkt 241001
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.
Dated: October 20, 2016.
Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–25744 Filed 10–24–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EH–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–457–A–D
(Fourth Review)]
Heavy Forged Hand Tools From China;
Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year
Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on heavy forged hand tools from
China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
DATES: Effective Date: October 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward Petronzio (202–205–3176),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On October 4, 2016,
the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (81
FR 43235, July 1, 2016) of the subject
five-year reviews was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)).2
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 Vice Chairman David S. Johanson voted to
conduct full reviews.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2016-10-25 |
File Created | 2016-10-25 |