1513-0009 Supporting Statement (2016-03-28)

1513-0009 Supporting Statement (2016-03-28).docx

Application to Establish and Operate Wine Premises, and Wine Bond

OMB: 1513-0009

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU


Supporting Statement –– Information Collection Request


OMB Control Number 1513–0009



Information Collection Request Title:


Application to Establish and Operate Wine Premises, and Wine Bond.



Information Collections Issued under this Title:


  • TTB F 5120.25 — Application to Establish and Operate Wine Premises.

  • TTB F 5120.36 — Wine Bond.



A. Justification


1. What are the circumstances that make this collection of information necessary, and what legal or administrative requirements necessitate the collection? Also align the information collection to TTB’s Line of Business/Sub-function and IT Investment, if one is used.


The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers chapter 51 (distilled spirits, wine, and beer), chapter 52 (tobacco products, processed tobacco, and cigarette papers and tubes), and sections 4181–4182 (firearms and ammunition excise taxes) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC, 26 U.S.C.), pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated certain IRC administrative and enforcement authorities to TTB through Treasury Department Order 120–01.


The IRC, at 26 U.S.C. 5351–5357, provides for the establishment of bonded wine cellars, bonded wineries, and taxpaid wine bottling houses. To establish such a wine premises, these sections of law require the filing of applications and bonds. These sections also authorize the Secretary to issue regulations regarding these matters. Specifically:

  • 26 U.S.C. 5351 requires that persons establishing a place for the production, blending, cellar treatment, storage, bottling, packaging, or repackaging of untaxpaid wine, including the use of untaxpaid wine spirits in wine production must, before starting operations, make an application and file a bond with the Secretary and then receive permission to operate. These operations are known as bonded wine cellars except for those operations engaged in production which are known as bonded wineries.

  • 26 U.S.C. 5352 requires that persons bottling, packaging, or repackaging taxpaid wines must, before starting operations, make an application to the Secretary and then receive permission to operate. Such premises are known as “taxpaid wine bottling houses.”

  • 26 U.S.C. 5354 describes the required bond amounts for bonded wine cellars (including bonded wineries), and it authorizes the Secretary to issue regulations concerning such bonds.

  • 26 U.S.C. 5356 authorizes the Secretary to issue regulations concerning the information required on wine premises applications in order to allow the Secretary to “determine the location and extent of the premises, the type of operations to be conducted on such premises, and whether the operations will be in conformity with law and regulations.”


Therefore, as authorized by these IRC sections, TTB has issued regulations concerning the content and filing of wine premises applications and the filing of wine bonds as required by the IRC. These regulations are found in 27 CFR Part 24, Wine, Subpart D, Establishment and Operations. The regulations in that subpart require the completion and submission of forms TTB F 5120.25, Application to Establish and Operate Wine Premises, and TTB F 5120.36, Wine Bond.


Applicants use TTB F 5120.25 to establish their qualifications for a new bonded wine cellar, bonded winery, or taxpaid wine bottling house. Using TTB F 5120.25 and the required supporting documents, applicants for new wine premises describe the name, location, type, organization, premises, and proposed operations of the business. Current proprietors use TTB F 5120.25 to amend the required application information already on file. Proprietors maintain the completed, or amended, application and supporting data as a permanent record of the business and its qualifications to operate.


The following TTB regulations require the use of TTB F 5120.25, prescribe data or supporting documentation for it, or contain other requirements related to the form:


24.100 24.101 24.102 24.105 24.106 24.107

24.108 24.109 24.110 24.111 24.112 24.113

24.114 24.115 24.117 24.120 24.122 24.123

24.124 24.125 24.126 24.127 24.128 24.129

24.130 24.131 24.135 24.136 24.137.


All bonded wine cellars and bonded wineries also must have a bond to guarantee payment of the Federal wine excise tax ((tax-paid wine bottling houses do not require bonds). Using TTB F 5120.36, proprietors describe their collateral or surety bond coverage. The following TTB regulations require the use of TTB F 5120.36 or contain other requirements related to the form:


24.145 24.146 24.147 24.148 24.153 24.154

24.155 24.156 24.157 24.158 24.159 24.291.


This information collection is aligned with:

  • Line of Business/Sub-function: General Government/Taxation Management.

  • IT Investment: Tax Major Application System.



2. How, by whom, and for what purpose is this information used?


TTB uses the information on the wine premises application form, TTB F 5120.25, and the attached supporting documents to determine the location and extent of the proposed wine premises, the type of operations to be conducted on such premises, and if those operations will be in conformity with the law and regulations. TTB uses the information on the wine bond form, TTB F 5120.36, to identify the bonded premises, the type and amount of the bond, the bond’s surety (if any), and to determine if the required bond will provide adequate protection for the revenue. The use of these standardized forms provides TTB with an efficient method of collecting the required information.


3. To what extent does this collection of information involve the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology? What consideration is given to use information technology to reduce burden?


TTB has approved and will continue to approve, on a case by case basis, the use of improved information technology for the collection and maintenance of required information.


The information required by the wine premises application and wine bond forms may be completed and submitted electronically via TTB’s Permits Online (PONL) system’s Winery Application (see https://www.ttbonline.gov/permitsonline/).


Both forms also are available in paper format on the TTB website forms page at http://www.ttb.gov/forms/ index.shtml as “fillable-printable” forms. Also posted to the TTB website forms page are separate instructions for the Wine Bond form and a worksheet for respondents to use in calculating the required bond. Respondents are NOT required to return this worksheet to TTB.


4. What efforts are used to identify duplication? Can similar information already available be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above?


TTB F 5120.25 and TTB F 5120.36 collect information that is unique to each respondent. As far as TTB can determine, similar information is not available elsewhere.


5. If this collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, what methods are used to minimize burden?


The filing of an application to establish a wine premises and the requirement for a bond are required by statute. These requirements cannot be waived merely because the respondent’s business is small. TTB believes the information collected is the minimum necessary to ensure protection of the revenue.


6. What consequences to Federal program or policy activities and what, if any, technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden will occur if this collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently?


The filing of an application to establish a wine premises and the requirement for a bond are required by statute. The required information is necessary for TTB to determine if the wine premises will be operated in compliance with the law and regulations, and to determine that the premises has an adequate bond. This information is required only when a respondent establishes a new wine premises or certain changes occur. Elimination or less frequent collection of this information would pose a jeopardy to the revenue.


7. Are there any special circumstances associated with this information collection that would require it to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with OMB guidelines?


Under 27 CFR 24.117, Maintenance of application file, wine premises proprietors must maintain a permanent file containing the application information required by 27 CFR 24.109 “in complete and current condition, readily available at the wine premises for inspection by appropriate TTB officers.”


8. What effort was made to notify the general public about this collection of information? Summarize the public comments that were received and describe the action taken by the agency in response to those comments.


To solicit comments from the general public, TTB published a “60-day” comment request notice for this information collection in the Federal Register on January 13, 2016, at 81 FR 1679. TTB received no comments on this information collection in response.


9. Was any payment or gift given to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees? If so, why?


No payment or gift is associated with this collection.


10. What assurance of confidentiality was provided to respondents, and what was the basis for the assurance in statute, regulations, or agency policy?


No specific assurance of confidentiality is provided on this form. However, Federal law at 26 U.S.C. 6103 prohibits disclosure of taxpayer-related information unless disclosure is specifically authorized by that section. TTB maintains its copy of this form in secure office space with controlled access and in password-protected computer systems.


11. What is the justification for questions of a sensitive nature? If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected in an electronic system, identify the Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) that has been conducted for the information collected under this request and/or the Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) issued for the electronic system in which the PII is being stored.


This information collection contains no questions of a sensitive nature.


A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the Tax Major Application System, and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for this system under TTB .001–Regulatory Enforcement Record System and published in the Federal Register on January 28, 2015, at 80 FR 4637. TTB’s PIAs are available on the TTB website at http://www.ttb.gov/foia/pia.shtml.


12. What is the estimated hour burden of this collection of information?


Based on recent experience, TTB estimates that 2,500 proprietors respond to this information collection an average of once per year, for a total of 2,500 responses. TTB estimates the average burden per response is 0.51 hours, resulting in an estimated total annual burden of 1,275 hours. This is a decrease from our 2013 estimate of 3,900 annual responses and 1,775 total annual burden hours.


The specific burden estimates for the two forms included in this information collection, in their paper and electronic formats, is as follows:



Respondents

Responses

per Year

Annual Responses

Hours per Response

Total Annual Burden Hours

F 5120.25 (paper)

380

1

380

0.25

95

F 5120.25 (PONL)*

1,120

1

1,120

0.25

280

F 5120.36 (paper)

600

1

600

1.0

600

F 5120.36 (PONL)*

400

1

400

0.75

300

TOTALS

2,500

1

2,500

0.51 (ave.)

1,275


*PONL = Permits Online, TTB’s web-based electronic application system.



13. What is the estimated annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from this information collection request (excluding the value of the hour burden in Question 12 above)?


We do not believe respondents bear any additional capital or start-up costs or any increased operation or maintenance costs as a result of this information collection requirement.


14. What is the annualized cost to the Federal Government?


Estimates of annual cost to the Federal Government are:


Printing costs

$ 0

Distribution costs

0

Clerical costs

15,250

Other Salary costs (review, supervisory, etc.)

90,750

TOTAL COSTS

$ 106,000


Printing and distribution costs to the Federal government have decreased to $0.00 in TTB’s cost estimate due to the availability of TTB forms to the public on the TTB Web site at http://www.ttb.gov/forms/index.shtml.


15. What is the reason for any program changes or adjustments reported?


There are no program changes associated with this collection.


As for adjustments, we are decreasing the estimated annual burden for this information collection, largely due to a decrease in the number of new wine premises applications received by TTB. Previously, TTB reported 3,900 annual responses and 1,775 total annual burden hours for this information collection. We are now reporting 2,500 annual responses and 1,275 annual burden hours, a decrease of 1,400 annual responses and 500 annual burden hours.


Form changes: On TTB F 5120.25, in the Privacy Act Notice and the Paperwork Reduction Act Statement, TTB is, respectively, correcting and adding the IRC section cited as the authority to collect the required information from 26 U.S.C. 5172 to 26 U.S.C. 5356. On TTB F 5120.36, TTB is correcting the IRC section cited in the Paperwork Reduction Act Statement from 26 U.S.C. 5172 to 26 U.S.C. 5354. In addition, TTB is updating its headquarters mailing address listed in the Paperwork Reduction Act Statements on both forms.


16. Outline plans for tabulation and publication for collections of information whose results will be published.


TTB will not publish the results of this collection.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection, what are the reasons that the display would be inappropriate?


As a cost saving measure for both TTB and the general public, TTB is seeking approval not to display the expiration date for OMB approval on the two forms included in this information collection. By not displaying the expiration date of this collection on the related forms, TTB will not have to update the forms’ expiration date on its electronic systems and website pages or on the form’s paper version each time the information collection is approved. Similarly, TTB-regulated businesses will not have to update their stocks of paper forms or alter electronic copies of the forms, including any marginally-punched continuous printed versions of the forms produced by some businesses, at their own expense, for use with their electronic systems or for sale to other businesses or individuals. Additionally, not displaying the OMB approval expiration date on these forms will avoid confusion among members of the public who may have identical forms with different expiration dates in their possession. By not displaying the expiration date, supplies of the forms could continue in use regardless of when OMB’s approval has expired.



18. What are the exceptions to the certification statement?


(c) See item 5 above.

(f) This is not a recordkeeping requirement.

(i) No statistics are involved.



B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods.


This collection does not employ statistical methods.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy