Paper Survey

Attachment 3-Paper Survey.doc

Survey to Assess the Feasibility of Establishing a Gynecologic Specimen Bank (NCI)

Paper Survey

OMB: 0925-0745

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf




Frame1


Survey to assess the feasibility of establishing a gynecologic specimen bank for research


  • Would you consider your practice to be primarily:

    • academic (primary activity within medical school teaching hospital or research institute)

    • private laboratory (not at the hospital)

    • private hospital (not affiliated with a medical center or research institute)

    • laboratory affiliated with managed health organization

  • What is the approximate annual surgical pathology specimen volume at the laboratory where you practice (if multiple, give largest):

    • <10K

    • 10-25K

    • >25-50K

    • >50K

  • What proportion of these specimens are gynecologic?

    • <10%

    • 10-20%

    • >20-50%

    • >50-100%

  • Does your laboratory have a subspecialty sign-out with a designated gynecologic section?

    • No

    • Yes

  • Does your laboratory receive risk-reducing surgery specimens from women at high-risk for gynecologic disease/cancer? If so, estimate annual number?

    • No

    • Yes (annual number: ___)


How are specimens for the following specific indications processed?

Clinical Indication

SEE-Fim

(Sectioning and Extensively Examining of the Fimbria)



Submit fimbria



Submit ovaries



Endometrium

High-Grade Serous Cancer

Stage I, II, IIIAi

  • No

  • Yes

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy

  • No

  • Yes

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

Surgery for benign indications, first sections reveal equivocal or definite STIC (serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma), epithelial atypia in ovary or clinically occult cancer

  • No

  • Yes


  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

Surgery for benign indications, first sections reviewed are negative

  • No

  • Yes


  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)

  • No

  • Yes (total)

  • Yes (partial)


  • Does your laboratory stain sections of fimbria for Ki67, p53 or other markers (check all that apply):

    • On every specimen?

    • On every risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy specimen?

    • On selected risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy specimens based on H&E review?

    • On early stage high-grade serous cancer?

    • Markers not evaluated


  • Would your laboratory consider providing de-identified blocks and matched pathology reports to a national specimen bank organized by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to provide access to researchers throughout the world? Possible specimens would include risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy, early high-grade serous cancer (HGSC), serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), and a minor percentage (10%) of total benign tubes and ovaries.

    • No

    • Yes


  • Other comments/clarifications?



2


File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorNational Cancer Institute
Last Modified ByBailey, Karla (NIH/NCI) [E]
File Modified2016-05-13
File Created2016-02-23

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy