60 Day Federal Register Notice

60 day FRN.pdf

Cape Lookout National Seashore Cultural Resource Values and Vulnerabilities Assessment

60 Day Federal Register Notice

OMB: 1024-0278

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

29334

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 98 / Thursday, May 21, 2015 / Notices

Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), the John
Day—Snake Resource Advisory Council
(RAC) will meet as indicated below:
DATES: The John Day—Snake RAC will
hold a public meeting Thursday, June
18, and Friday, June 19, 2015. The
meeting will run from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. on June 18th, and from 8 a.m. to
1:00 p.m. on June 19th. The meeting
will be held in the Sternwheel Ballroom
at the Quality Inn & Suites Conference
Center in Clarkston, Washington, and
will include a field trip to the Hells
Canyon Recreation Area. A public
comment period will be available on the
second day of the session.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Clark, Public Affairs Specialist, BLM
Prineville District Office, 3050 NE. 3rd
Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754, (541)
416–6864, or email [email protected].
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1 (800) 877–8339 to contact the
above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above
individual. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The John
Day—Snake RAC consists of 15
members chartered and appointed by
the Secretary of the Interior. Their
diverse perspectives are represented in
commodity, conservation, and general
interests. They provide advice to BLM
and Forest Service resource managers
regarding management plans and
proposed resource actions on public
land in central and eastern Oregon.
Agenda items for the June 2015 meeting
include a field tour of the Hells Canyon
Recreation Area, an update on the John
Day Basin Resource Management Plan
and the Blue Mountain Forest Plan
Revision, a presentation of the business
plan and request for fee increase for the
Lower Deschutes River, committee and
member updates, and any other matters
that may reasonably come before the
John Day—Snake RAC. This meeting is
open to the public in its entirety;
however, transportation on jet boats
during the field tour portion of the
meeting on June 18 will not be provided
to members of the public. Information to
be distributed to the John Day—Snake
RAC is requested prior to the start of
each meeting. A public comment period
will be available on June 19, 2015, at
9:30 a.m. Unless otherwise approved by
the John Day—Snake RAC Chair, the
public comment period will last no
longer than 30 minutes. Each speaker
may address the John Day—Snake RAC

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:28 May 20, 2015

Jkt 235001

for a maximum of 5 minutes. A public
call-in number is provided on the John
Day—Snake RAC Web site at http://
www.blm.gov/or/rac/jdrac.php. Meeting
times and the duration scheduled for
public comment periods may be
extended or altered when the authorized
representative considers it necessary to
accommodate business and all who seek
to be heard regarding matters before the
John Day—Snake RAC.
Carol Benkosky,
Prineville District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2015–12299 Filed 5–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

I. Abstract

National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRSS–18302;
PPWONRADW1, PPMRSNR1Y.NW0000
(155)]

Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Cape Lookout
National Seashore Cultural Resource
Values and Vulnerabilities Assessment
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

We (National Park Service)
will ask the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to approve the
Information Collection (IC) described
below. The National Park Service is
exploring ways to reduce the risk of
damage to structures and natural
systems from destructive storm surge
and sea level rise. We will collect
information from stakeholders’ about
their values and perceptions of climate
change-related vulnerabilities and
adaptation strategies for managing
cultural resources within the two
historic districts (Portsmouth Village
and Lookout Village) at Cape Lookout
National Seashore (CALO). Stakeholders
will be visitors at Portsmouth Village
and Lookout Village, partner
organizations, local community
members with ties to the historic
districts, federal, state and private
cultural resource experts. This
collection will be used to inform
cultural resource adaptation planning
efforts (i.e., maintenance, sustainability
and post-storm recovery of historic
structures and cemeteries) related to
impacts of extreme weather events. To
comply with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, and as part of our
continuing efforts to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, we invite the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this IC.

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00036

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

To ensure that your comments
on this IC are considered, we must
receive them on or before July 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
to Phadrea Ponds, Information
Collections Coordinator, National Park
Service, 1201 Oakridge Drive, Fort
Collins, CO 80525 (mail); or phadrea_
[email protected] (email). Please reference
Information Collection 1024—NEW,
2015 CALO SURVEY in the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet Cakir, Ph.D., NPS SER Climate
Change, Socioeconomics, and
Adaptation Coordinator, South Atlantic
Landscape Conservation Cooperative,
1751 Varsity Dr., Raleigh, NC 27606
(mail) or [email protected] (email).
DATES:

Managers of Cape Lookout National
Seashore (CALO) are interested in
identifying ways to reduce the risk of
damage to coastal buildings and
sensitive species from storm surge, sea
level rise, and shoreline erosion
anticipated over the next 20 to 30 years.
Of specific interest to managers are
contemporary cultural resource values
and perceptions of cultural resource
vulnerability and feasible adaptation
strategies to sustain its cultural
resources for future generations. The
National Park Service (NPS) will
conduct a survey of visitors to the two
historic districts (Portsmouth Village
and Lookout Village) at Cape Lookout
National Seashore (CALO), a survey
with members of CALO’s partner
organizations, interview local
community members with connections
to the historic districts, and conduct a
survey with cultural resource experts
from federal and state agencies and
nongovernmental organizations.
The collection will be used to
understand the values stakeholders
place on cultural resources within the
historic districts, and perceptions of
strategies to adapt and respond to
changes in cultural resource conditions
from storms, flooding, and erosion. The
information from this collection will
provide NPS managers and planners
with information that can be used to
prepare resource management planning
documents.
Lessons learned from this study may
be applied to support cultural resource
adaptation planning for units across the
NPS system.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: None. This is
a new collection.
Title: Cape Lookout National Seashore
Cultural Resource Values and
Vulnerabilities Assessment.

E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM

21MYN1

29335

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 98 / Thursday, May 21, 2015 / Notices
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: One-time.
Estimated Number of Responses: 600.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 321.
We estimate the public reporting burden
for this collection will average 10
minutes per response for visitors; 15

Type of Request: New.
Affected Public: Park Visitors, Local
Residents, Partner Organization
Members, State Cultural/Historic
Resource Personnel, and
Nongovernmental Cultural Resource
Organization Personnel.

minutes per response for partner
organizations; 1 hour per response for
community members, and 2.5 hours per
response for cultural resource experts.
This includes the time for reviewing
instructions and completing the survey.

Estimated
number of
responses

Estimated
annual burden
(hours)

Visitor Survey ...................................................................................................................
Partner Organization Survey ...........................................................................................
Community Interviews .....................................................................................................
Cultural Resource Experts Survey ..................................................................................

200
200
50
150

10
15
60
75

33
50
50
188

Total ..........................................................................................................................

600

............................

321

Estimated Annual Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’: None.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and current expiration date.

We invite comments concerning this
IC on:
• Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the agency
to perform its duties, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
• Ways to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this IC. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:28 May 20, 2015

Dated: May 14, 2015.
Madonna Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–12306 Filed 5–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EH–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service

III. Request for Comments

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Estimated
response time
(minutes)

Jkt 235001

[NPS–PWR–PWRO–17572;
PX.P0073969J.00.1]

Record of Decision for General
Management Plan, Golden Gate
National Recreation Area, California
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

The National Park Service,
has prepared and approved a Record of
Decision for the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the new General
Management Plan (GMP) for Golden
Gate National Recreation Area.
Approval of the GMP concludes a very
extensive public engagement and
conservation planning and
environmental impact analysis effort
that began during 2006. The requisite
no-action ‘‘wait period’’ was initiated on
April 25, 2014, with the Environmental
Protection Agency’s Federal Register
announcement of the filing and release
of the Final EIS.
ADDRESSES: Those wishing to review the
Record of Decision for the GMP may
obtain a copy by contacting the General
Superintendent, Golden Gate National
Recreation Area, Building 201, Fort
Mason, San Francisco, CA 94123, or via
telephone request at (415) 561–4930.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Aviles, Senior Planner, Golden
Gate National Recreation Area, (415)
561–4942.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Park Service (NPS) has
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00037

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

approved the Record of Decision for the
GMP/Final Environmental Impact
Statement which will guide
management of park lands within
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
(GGNRA) over the next 20 years.
Following establishment in 1972, the
GGNRA has been operating under a
1980 GMP. Since then GGNRA has
doubled in size and visitation now
approaches 16 million annually.
The NPS has selected Alternative 1
Connecting People With Parks for
implementation on park lands in Marin,
San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties.
Park management will focus on ways to
attract and welcome people; connect
visitors with the resources; and promote
enjoyment, understanding, preservation,
and health for diverse populations now
and in the future. To achieve these
objectives, management zones will be
applied in all areas, enhancements will
be made to park programs, and a
number of projects will be carried out to
preserve, restore, and/or improve
cultural and natural resources as well as
park facilities and infrastructure.
The NPS has selected Alternative 3
Focusing on National Treasures for
implementation at Alcatraz Island and
Muir Woods National Monument. Park
management will showcase nationally
important cultural and natural resources
at each site. These fundamental
resources will be managed at the highest
level of preservation to protect the
resources in perpetuity and to promote
appreciation, understanding, and
enjoyment of those resources—all other
resources will be managed to
complement the nationally significant
resources and the associated visitor
experience.
Four alternatives, including a noaction alternative, were described and
evaluated in the Final Environmental
Impact Statement, the full range of
foreseeable environmental
consequences was assessed, and

E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM

21MYN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2015-05-21
File Created2015-05-21

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy