SuppStmnt. 1545-1191 2016May

SuppStmnt. 1545-1191 2016May.doc

Information with Respect to Certain Foreign- Owned Corporations - IRC Section 6038A (TD 8353 and REG-127199-15)

OMB: 1545-1191

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

OMB# 1545-1191

Information with Respect to Certain Foreign- Owned Corporations

TD 8353 and REG-127199-15 (NPRM)



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Section 6038A generally requires that 25‑percent foreign-owned U.S. corporations and foreign corporations engaged in a trade or business within the United States must furnish information annually on an information return, Form 5472 (OMB#1545-0123), and maintain records relating to transactions between such corporations and any foreign related parties. Additionally, section 6038A requires a foreign related party that engages in a transaction with a foreign‑owned U.S. or foreign corporation to authorize that corporation to act as its agent for IRS summons purposes.


Proposed regulations (REG-127199-15) would treat domestic disregarded entities wholly owned by a foreign person as domestic corporations separate from their owners for the limited purposes of the reporting, record maintenance and associated compliance requirements that apply to 25 percent foreign-owned domestic corporations under section 6038A of the Internal Revenue Code. These changes are intended to provide the IRS with improved access to information that it needs to satisfy its obligations under U.S. tax treaties, tax information exchange agreements and similar international agreements, as well as to strengthen the enforcement of U.S. tax laws.


  1. USE OF DATA


The records required to be maintained and the information reported on Form 5472 will be used in auditing foreign‑owned U.S. corporations and foreign corporations. The information is needed to satisfy the IRS’s obligations under U.S. tax treaties, tax information exchange agreements and similar international agreements, as well as to strengthen the enforcement of U.S. tax laws.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


The Internal Revenue Service is considering alternate ways to reduce burden on small business and other entities and has requested public comments.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Consequences of less frequent collection would result in inaccurate recordkeeping, reporting transactions, and profit and loss statements. Increased issuing of subpoenas and summons to obtain records between reporting corporations and related parties.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


The proposed regulations were published as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register on December 10, 1990, (55 FR 50706), which provided the general public with a 60‑day period in which to review and provide comments relating to any aspect of the proposed regulations. A public hearing was held on February 22, 1991. Final regulations were published in the Federal Register on June 19, 1991 (56 FR 28056).


The proposed regulations (REG-127199-15) will be published as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register on May 10, 2016, which will provide the general public with a 60 day period in which to review and provide comments relating to any aspect of the proposed regulations.

  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO

RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.

10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No personally identifiable information (PII) is collected.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.6038A‑2 of the attached regulations advises taxpayers as to the requirement to complete Form 5472. The burden estimate for this requirement is reflected in the burden of Form 5472.


Section 1.6038A‑3 of the attached regulations advises taxpayers as to the record maintenance requirement. A reporting corporation must keep the permanent books of account or records as required by section 6001 that are sufficient to establish the correctness of the Federal income tax return of the corporation, including information or records that might be relevant to determine the correct tax treatment of transactions with related parties.


Number of Time per Total

Recordkeepers Recordkeeper Annual burden hours


64,000 10 hours 640,000 hours

13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


There are no capital/ start-up or ongoing operation/ maintenance cost associated with this information collection.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There is no estimated annualized cost to the federal government.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


The change in likely respondents with the proposed regulations (foreign owned domestic entities that are disregarded as separate from their owners) results in an estimated increase of 1,000 recordkeepers. The amount of time that it takes each recordkeeper to comply with the regulations remains the same at 10 hours per recordkeeper. The increase in the number of recordkeepers increases the total estimated annual burden hours for this information collection by 10,000 for a total of 640,000 burden hours.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS

INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the

expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.




File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorTQ1FB
Last Modified ByDepartment of Treasury
File Modified2016-05-05
File Created2016-05-05

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy