Form 1 PIMS Measures Care Coordination Program

Rural Health Care Coordination Network Partnership Program Performance Improvement Measurement System

PIMS Measures Care Coordination Program as of June 21 2016

Rural Health Care Coordination Network Partnership Program Measures

OMB: 0906-0024

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OShape1 MB Number: 0000-0000

Expiration date: 00/XX/XXXX

DRAFT PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE DRAFT


Public Burden Statement:  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  The OMB control number for this project is XXXX-XXXX.  Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to HRSA Reports Clearance Officer, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 10C-24, Rockville, Maryland, 20857.



Rural Health Care Coordination Network Partnership (Care Coordination) Program


Section 1: ACCESS TO CARE


Table Instructions: This table collects information about an aggregate count of the number of people served through the program and the types of services that were provided during this budget period. Please report responses using a numeric figure. If the total number is zero (0), please put zero in the appropriate section. Do not leave any sections blank. There should not be an N/A (not applicable) response since all measures are applicable to all grantees.


Please refer to these detailed definitions and guidelines in providing your answers to the following measures:


Number of counties served in project and number of people in target population should be consistent with the figures your program reported in your grant application. The number of counties served should reflect your project’s service area.


Direct Services are defined as a documented interaction between a patient/client and a clinical or non-clinical health professional that has been funded with FORHP grant dollars. Examples of direct services include (but are not limited to) patient visits, counseling, and education.


For the purposes of this data collection activity, indirect services will be limited to:

  1. billboards,

  2. flyers,

  3. health fairs,

  4. mailings/newsletters, and

  5. other mass media (radio, television, newspaper and social media)*


*For radio, television and newspaper please report estimated total circulation. For social media, please report the reach (number of followers).




Baseline


End of Budget Period

1

Number of counties served in project



2

Number of people in the target population

(This is the number of people in your target population, but not the number of people who actually received your direct services)



3

Number of unique individuals who received direct services during this budget period

Please report the number of unique (i.e. unduplicated count) patients/clients that received direct services from your organization





SECTION 2: POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS


Table Instructions: This table collects information about an aggregate count of the people served by race, ethnicity, age and insurance status. The total for each of the following questions should equal the total of the number of unique individuals who received only direct services reported in the previous section. Please do not leave any sections blank. There should not be a N/A (not applicable) response since the measures are applicable to all grantees. If the number for a particular category is zero (0), please put zero in the appropriate section (e.g., if the total number that is Hispanic or Latino is zero (0), enter zero in that section).


Note: The expectation is that you would collect baseline data, and then again report at the end of the budget period. “Unknown” may include those who refused to answer ethnicity/race.


Number of people served through program by ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino/Not Hispanic or Latino) is defined as:

  • Hispanic or Latino origin includes Mexican, Mexican American, Chicano, Puerto Rican, Cuban and other Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin (i.e., Argentinean, Colombian, Dominican, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran, Spaniard, etc.)



Baseline

End of Budget Period


4

Number of people served by ethnicity:





Hispanic or Latino





Not Hispanic or Latino





Unknown





Total (automatically calculated)

Equal to the total of the number of unique individuals who received direct services

Equal to the total of the number of unique individuals who received direct services


5

Number of people served by race:




 

 

 

 

 

 

American Indian or Alaska Native




Asian




Black or African American




Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander




White




More than one race




Other




Unknown





Total (automatically calculated)

Equal to the total of the number of unique individuals who received direct services

Equal to the total of the number of unique individuals who received direct services


6

Number of people by insurance status:





Uninsured/self-pay





Dual Eligible (covered by both Medicaid and Medicare)





Medicaid/CHIP only





Medicare plus supplemental





Medicare only





Other third party





Unknown





Total (automatically calculated)

Equal to the total of the number of unique individuals who received direct services

Equal to the total of the number of unique individuals who received direct services




SECTION 3: STAFFING


Table Instructions: This table collects information about an aggregate number of clinical and non-clinical positions funded by this grant during this budget period. If you are not sure who is funded by this grant, please refer to the staffing plan and budget narrative that was submitted with your grant application. Please report a numeric figure. There should not be a N/A (not applicable) response since all measures are applicable to all grantees.


Please report each staff person who is funded by this program only once. Clinical staff includes, but is not limited to, physician (general or specialty), physician assistant, nurse, nurse practitioner, dentist, dental hygienist, psychiatrist, social worker, pharmacist, therapist (behavioral, physical, occupational, speech, etc.), health educator, community health worker, promotora, case manager, interpreter/translator, care coordinator. Clinical staff are individuals that directly interact with patients/clinics.


Non-clinical staff includes management (CEO, CFO, CIO, etc.), support staff, fiscal and billing staff, information technology (IT). Non-clinical staff are individuals that do not directly interact with patients/clients.




End of Budget Period

7

Number of positions funded by grant dollars during this budget period




Total number of new clinical staff




Total number of new non-clinical staff




Total number of in-kind staff




Total number FTE amount of all staff paid via grant

0.0 Format






SECTION 4: SUSTAINABILITY


Table Instructions: This table collects information/data about the grant’s programmatic sustainability. There should not be a N/A (not applicable) response since the measures are applicable to all grantees. For the purposes of this report, sustainability efforts will be reported on at the end of each budget period (once per year).


In Year 3 of grant funding, grantees will need to report on the additional measures:

  • Question #11 - The ratio impact for Economic Impact vs. HRSA Program Funding using HRSA’s Economic Impact Analysis Tool (https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/econtool)

  • Question #12 - If your current consortium/network will sustain after the grant project period is over

  • Question #13 - If any of the activities will sustain after the grant project period is over




End of Budget Period

8

Annual program revenue
Please report the amount of annual program revenue made through the services offered through the program. Program revenue is defined as payments received for the services provided by the program that the grant supports. These services should be the same services outlined in your grant application work plan. Please do not include donations. If the total amount of annual revenue made is zero (0), please put zero in the appropriate section.

Dollar amount

9

Sources of Sustainability
Select the type(s) of sources of funding for sustainability. Please check all that apply.



Program revenue



In-kind Contributions (In-Kind contributions are defined as donations of anything other than money, including goods or services/time.)



Membership fees/dues



Fundraising/ Monetary donations



Contractual Services



Other grants



Fees charged to individuals for services



Reimbursement from third-party payers (e.g. private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid)



Product sales



Government (non-grant)



Other – specify type 



None


10

Which of the following activities have you engaged in to enhance your sustained impact?  Check all that apply.

Selection list


Local, State and Federal Policy changes



Media Campaigns



Community Engagement Activities



Other – Specify activity


11

What is your ratio for Economic Impact vs. HRSA Program Funding?
Use the HRSA’s Economic Impact Analysis Tool (https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/econtool) to identify your ratio.

Please attach the online generated Economic Impact Report.

Ratio

12

Will the consortium/network sustain after the project period?

Y/N

13

Will any of the program’s activities be sustained after the project period?

(Some/None/All)



SECTION 5: HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY


Table Instructions: Health Information Technology (HIT)

Please select all types of technology implemented, expanded or strengthened through this program.


14

Type(s) of technology implemented, expanded or strengthened through this program: (Please check all that apply)

Selection list


Computerized provider order entry (CPOE)


Electronic entry of prescriptions/e-prescribing


Electronic medical records/electronic health records

 

Health information exchange (HIE)

 

Patient/disease registry

 

Telehealth/telemedicine

 

None

 

Other – please specify

 



SECTION 6: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT


Table Instructions:

Please report on quality improvement activities and initiatives implemented, expanded or strengthened through this program.

.

  • An Accountable Care Organization (ACO) is a group of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to Medicare patients.

  • A Medical Home is defined as comprehensive and continuous medical care to patients with the goal of obtaining maximized health outcomes. To become a medical home an organization generally gains a level of certification from an accrediting body.

  • Care coordination is defined as the deliberate organization of patient care activities between two or more participants (including the patient) involved in a patient’s care to facilitate the appropriate delivery of health care services.

  • The Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) is a Flex Grant Program activity within the core area of quality improvement for Critical Access Hospitals (CAH). (https://www.ruralcenter.org/tasc/mbqip)




15

Participation in Accountable Care Organization (ACO)

Is your organization participating in an ACO? (If yes, please check all that apply)

Yes/No

(Selection List)


Medicare Shared Savings Program


Advanced Payment ACO Model


Pioneer ACO Model


Other – specify


16

Participation in Medical Home

Is your organization participating in a Medical Home or Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) initiative?

Yes/No


If yes, have you achieved or are you pursuing certification or recognition? (If yes, please check all that apply)

Yes/No

(Selection List)

National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)


Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC)


The Joint Commission


State/Medicaid Program


Other – specify


17

Critical Access Hospitals: Participation in Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP)

Yes/No

18

Other – please specify





SECTION 7: CARE COORDINATION


Table Instructions: This table collects information about care coordination activities as a direct result of the Care Coordination grant.

If your grant did support one or more of the care coordination activities, but you do not know the information, then select/enter DK (do not know). If your grant did not support one or more these care coordination activities, then select/enter N/A (not applicable).



19

Care Coordination Activities: Have you done these activities this budget period?

Yes/No

(Selection List)


Referral tracking system


Facilitate transitions across settings


Patient support and engagement


Integrated care delivery system (agreements with specialists, hospitals, community organizations, etc. to coordinate care)


Case management


Care plans


Linkage to community resources


Medication management


Hiring care coordinator(s)


Other – specify




SECTION 8: CLINICAL MEASURES


Table Instructions:

Please use your health information technology system to extract the clinical data requested. Please refer to the specific definitions for each measure (PQRS Measures list, etc.).


If your project focused on Type 2 diabetes, you are required to report on four out of the five outcome measures listed in the table below at a minimum. All of the Diabetes measures below are capturing Type 2 Diabetes measures (not type 1). If you did not focus on Type 2 diabetes, put N/A.


If your project focused on Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), you are required to report on four out of the four outcome measures listed in the table below at a minimum. If you did not focus on CHF, put N/A.


If your project focused on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), you are required to report on four out of the five outcome measures listed in the table below at a minimum. If you did not focus on COPD, put N/A.


All care coordination grantees are to report on the Care Coordination Measures section.




Numerator

Denominator

Percent


Type 2 Diabetes




1

PQRS 0313: Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control: Percentage of patients 18-75 years of age with diabetes who had hemoglobin A1c > 9.0% during the measurement period




2

PQRS 2: Diabetes: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) Control (<100 mg/dL):

Percentage of patients 18–75 years of age with diabetes whose LDL-C was adequately controlled (< 100 mg/dL) during the measurement period




3

PQRS 117: Diabetes: Eye Exam: Percentage of patients 18 through 75 years of age with a diagnosis of diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who had a retinal or dilated eye exam by an eye care professional in the measurement period or a negative retinal or dilated eye exam (negative for retinopathy) in the year prior to the measurement period




4

PQRS 119: Diabetes: Medical Attention for Nephropathy: The percentage of patients 18-75 years of age with diabetes who had a nephropathy screening test or evidence of nephropathy during the measurement period




5

PQRS 163: Diabetes: Foot Exam: Percentage of patients aged 18-75 years of age with diabetes who had a foot exam during the measurement period





Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)




1

PQRS 5: Heart Failure (HF): Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD): Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with a current or prior left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% who were prescribed ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy either within a 12 month period when seen in the outpatient setting OR at each hospital discharge




2

PQRS 8: Heart Failure (HF): Beta-Blocker Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD): Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with a current or prior left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% who were prescribed beta-blocker therapy either within a 12 month period when seen in the outpatient setting OR at each hospital discharge




3

PQRS 7: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): Beta-Blocker Therapy – Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVEF < 40%): Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease seen within a 12 month period who also have prior MI OR a current or prior LVEF < 40% who were prescribed beta-blocker therapy




4

PQRS 226: Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who were screened for tobacco use one or more times within 24 months AND who received cessation counseling intervention if identified as a tobacco user.





Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)




1

PQRS 51: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Spirometry Evaluation: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of COPD who had spirometry results documented




2

PQRS 52: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Inhaled Bronchodilator Therapy: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of COPD and who have an FEV1/FVC less than 60% and have symptoms who were prescribed an inhaled bronchodilator




3

PQRS 110: Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization: Percentage of patients aged 6 months and older seen for a visit between October 1 and March 31 who received an influenza immunization OR who reported previous receipt of an influenza immunization.




4

PQRS 111: Pneumonia Vaccination Status for Older Adults: Percentage of patients 65 years of age and older who have ever received a pneumococcal vaccine.




5

PQRS 226: Preventive Care and Screening: Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who were screened for tobacco use one or more times within 24 months AND who received cessation counseling intervention if identified as a tobacco user.







Care Coordination Measures




1

CMS 4: Chronic Care ACSC Composite

Measure: Rate of risk-adjusted hospitalizations

for the three chronic care ACSC measures (diabetes composite; COPD or asthma; or heart failure), expressed as discharges per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes, COPD or asthma, or chronic heart failure attributed to a physician or group of physicians (based on AHRQ’s PQIs)




2

NQF 0097/PQRS 046: Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge: The percentage of discharges from any inpatient facility (e.g. hospital, skilled nursing facility, or rehabilitation facility) for patients 18 years and older of age seen within 30 days following discharge in the office by the physician, prescribing practitioner, registered nurse, or clinical pharmacist providing on-going care for whom the discharge medication list was reconciled with the current medication list in the outpatient medical record.

This measure is reported as three rates stratified by age group:


Reporting Criteria 1: 18-64 years of age

Reporting Criteria 2: 65 years and older

Total Rate: All patients 18 years of age and older




3

NQF 0326: Advance Care Plan (NCQA)

Description: Percentage of patients aged 65 years and older who have an advance care plan or surrogate decision maker documented in the medical record or documentation in the medical record that an advance care plan was discussed but the patient did not wish or was not able to name a surrogate decision maker or provide an advance care plan.





Page 15 of 15


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitlePIMS Measures Care Coordination Program as of June 21 2016
AuthorSara Afayee
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-23

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy