OMB Control Number 1910 - 5155
U.S. Department of Energy
HISTORIC PRESERVATION REPORT
Historic Preservation Reporting Period: ______________________________
Grant Number: ______________________________
1a. State where recipient is located: ______________________________
1b. Name of Recipient:
______________________________________________________________
1c. Have you utilized a U.S. DOE-executed Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement (PA) in order to comply with National Historic Preservation Act requirements for all or some of your U.S. DOE-funded EECBG, WAP, or SEP activities? Yes ____ No ____
1d. If your answer to 1c above is no, then for any activities for which you did NOT utilize a PA for historic preservation review have you otherwise complied with National Historic Preservation Act requirements for those activities?
Yes ____ No ____ N/A ____
1e. Total number of activities being undertaken with DOE funds:
___________________________
If your answer to question 1c above is “yes” then please answer questions 2a through 3a: |
|
2a. Identify the number of activities that were exempt from further historic preservation review under the PA due to property age: |
|
2b. Identify the number of activities exempt from further historic preservation review per the PA list of exempt activities: |
|
2c. Identify the number of activities exempt from further historic preservation review under the PA due to a prior review under a Section 106 Agreement for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG): |
|
3. For any activities that you did not identify as exempt from further review under questions 2a, 2b, 2c, or 2d, please list the following: |
|
3a. Number of Section 106 reviews completed under the PA: |
|
Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Disclosure Statement
This data is being collected to verify compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The data you supply will be used to demonstrate that projects implemented through the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Programs are not adversely affecting historic properties pending compliance with Section 106.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2 hrs per response for WAP recipients, 4 hours per response for SEP recipients and 2 hrs per response for EECBG recipients, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Office of the Chief Information Officer, Records Management Division, IM-11, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-5155), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC, 20585-1290; and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OIRA, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-5155), Washington, DC 20503.
Historic Preservation Report Instructions
Line Item Instructions for the Historic Preservation Report
Item
#
Reporting
Item
Instructions
Historic
Preservation Reporting Period
Recipients
must report to DOE through the PAGE system annually no later than
9/15. The annual reporting period is 8/31 through 9/1.
Grant
Number
The
grant number begins with four letters followed by 7 numerical
digits (e.g. ...DE-EE0000000)
1a
State
where recipient is located
Enter
State abbreviation from SF424
1b
Name
of Recipient
Enter
Grantee Legal Name from SF424
1c
Utilization
of U.S. DOE executed Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement
(PA)
A
Programmatic Agreement (PA) is an agreement covering the
recipients in the State identified in question 1(a) and which is
executed between the United States Department of Energy, the
State Agency Recipient(s) receiving financial assistance from
U.S. DOE for EECBG, WAP, and SEP and the State Historic
Preservation Office.
1d
Activities
for which a PA was not utilized to meet the requirements of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
The
term “activities” as used in this report refers to
the individual tasks that comprise a project funded in whole or
in part by U.S.DOE through EECBG, WAP or SEP.
1e
Total
number of activities being funded in whole or in part with DOE
funds
User
entry is required and it must be numeric.
(see
also, definition of “activities” in the instructions
to 1d above)
2a
Activities
exempt from further historic preservation review under the PA due
to property age
User
entry is required and it must be numeric.
2b
Activities
exempt from further historic preservation review per the PA list
of exempt activities.
The
PA should identify in a list or Appendix those activities that
are exempt from further historic preservation review. User entry
is required and it must be numeric.
2c |
Activities exempt from further historic preservation review under the PA due to a prior review under a Section 106 Agreement for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). |
User entry is required and it must be numeric. (Note that the PA executed in your state may not have this exemption) |
3 |
Activities not identified as exempt from further review under questions 2a, 2b, 2c, or 2d. |
If activities are not exempt from further review under at least one of the categories identified in questions 2a, b, c or d, then the Recipient is required to conduct a historic preservation review in accordance with the remaining Stipulations in the PA. |
3a |
Number of Section 106 reviews completed under the PA. |
User entry is required and it must be numeric. |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Armstrong, MA |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-23 |