1545-1452_Supporting Statement

1545-1452_Supporting Statement.doc

FI-43-94 (TD 8649 - Final) Regulations Under Section 1258 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; Netting Rule for Certain Conversion Transactions.

OMB: 1545-1452

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

(TD 8649)

OMB# 1545-1452




1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION

Under section 1258(a), gain generated by any position of a conversion transaction is treated as ordinary income to the extent of the applicable imputed income amount (AIIA). The (AIIA) is equal to the taxpayer’s net investment in the transaction multiplied by the applicable rate, with certain adjustments. The applicable rate is generally 120 percent of the applicable Federal rate, determined as if the conversion transaction were a debt instrument.

Section 1258(a) may create a character mismatch because it focuses separately on each position of a conversion transaction and recharacterizes gain, but not loss. Section 1.1258-1(b)(1) of the regulations provides relief from this potential character mismatch in certain circumstances by allowing taxpayers to net gains and losses on the positions of certain conversion transactions for purposes of section 1258(a).


Under section 1.1258-1(b)(2) of the regulations, to be eligible for netting relief, the taxpayer must identify all the positions that are part of the conversion transaction. The identification must be made on the taxpayer’s books and records before the close of the day on which the positions become part of the conversion transaction.

2. USE OF DATA


The data is used by the Internal Revenue Service to aid in administering the law and to prevent manipulation of the netting rules through the use of hindsight. This information will be used to determine whether the taxpayer has elected to net losses against gains before applying section 1258(a) and to verify that the taxpayer is properly reporting its conversion transactions that are subject to netting.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.




4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


There are no small entities affected by this collection.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Consequences of less frequent collection on federal programs or policy activities could consist of a decrease in the amount of taxes collected by the Service, inaccurate and untimely filing of tax returns, and an increase in tax violations.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE

INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON

AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY

OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


A notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on December 27, 1994 (59 FR 66498). A public hearing was not held because none was requested. The final regulations (TD 8649), were published in the Federal Register on December 21, 1995 (60 FR 66083).


We received no comments in response to the Federal Register notice (81 FR 35818), dated June 3, 2016.


9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO

RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.

11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Business Master file (BMF)” and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for these systems under IRS 22.062 – Electronic Filing Records; IRS 24.030 – Customer Account Data Engine (CADE) Individual Master File; IRS 24.046 - CADE Business Master File (BMF);IRS 34.037 - IRS Audit Trail and Security Records System. The Internal Revenue Service PIA’s can be found at http://www.irs.gov/uac/Privacy-Impact-Assessments-PIA.


Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.



12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.1258-1(b)(2) of the regulations requires the taxpayer to identify all the positions that are part of the conversion transaction to be eligible for netting relief. We estimate that 50,000 investors will identify the positions of one or more conversion transactions and it will take them from 0.05 hour to 10.0 hours annually to make and retain identification, with an estimated average of 0.1 hour. The total burden for this recordkeeping requirement is 5,000 hours.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour

burdens shown are not available at this time.

13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


There is no estimated cost burden to respondents.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There are no start-up costs to the federal government.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN

There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.

16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS

INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is

inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading

taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the

expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that

the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval

and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.

18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorDepartment of Treasury
Last Modified ByDepartment of Treasury
File Modified2016-08-05
File Created2016-08-05

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy