Hspd-7

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
The Director

June 17, 2004
M-04-15
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
FROM:

Joshua B. Bolten
Director

SUBJECT:

Development of Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) - 7 Critical
Infrastructure Protection Plans to Protect Federal
Critical Infrastructures and Key Resources

On December 17th, 2003, the President signed HSPD-7, "Critical Infrastructure Identification,
Prioritization and Protection" (Attachment A). This HSPD supersedes Presidential Decision
Directive/NSC-63 of May 22, 1998, “Critical Infrastructure Protection”, and establishes a
national policy for Federal departments and agencies to identify and prioritize United States
critical infrastructure and key resources and to protect them from terrorist attacks.
HSPD-7 instructed Federal departments and agencies (agencies) to prepare plans for protecting
physical and cyber critical infrastructure and key resources (CI/KR), owned or operated,
including leased facilities by July 31, 2004. OMB has been working with agencies on this
requirement and agency Chief Information Officers received official distribution of draft
guidance on April 27, 2004. This memorandum, developed in consultation with the Homeland
Security Council (HSC) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), includes the required
format for agencies to use when submitting internal critical infrastructure protection (CIP) plans.
Pursuant to the guidance provided herein, these plans must address identification, prioritization,
protection, and contingency planning, including the recovery and reconstitution of essential
capabilities. In particular, planning must include protection priorities, the agency’s ability to
ensure continuity of business operations during a physical or cyber attack, and, where current
capabilities are lacking, plans of action and milestones to achieve the necessary level of
performance.
Upon submission, security plans will be subject to an interagency review coordinated by DHS.
The goals of these reviews include ensuring consistent planning and protection of Federal CI/KR
across the Federal government. DHS will prepare a written evaluation of each agency’s physical
security plan and provide that evaluation within 120 days of the agency’s submission of the plan.
Agency cyber security plans will be reviewed in a manner consistent with reviews of cyber
security reports submitted under the Federal Information Security Management Act and current
guidance. These efforts will inform DHS’ efforts to develop the National Infrastructure
Protection Plan, as it will provide the data for a more detailed analysis of CI/KR. DHS’ planning
effort will outline the methodology for determining what government facilities are priorities for
protection.

Agencies are requested to submit internal CIP plans utilizing the reporting instructions contained
in Attachment B. A consolidated plan must be prepared at the Departmental or “parent” agency
level and cover all agency sub-elements to the extent they own or operate critical infrastructures
or key resources. The July 31, 2004 report must be submitted by the Deputy Secretary or
equivalent official.
Agencies will soon receive additional instructions regarding the means for securely transmitting
these internal CIP plans. At a minimum, agency-specific information in the internal CIP plans
should be safeguarded as sensitive and should receive the full measure of protection afforded by
Exemption 2 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. sec. 552, if an agency ever receives a
FOIA request for such information. Further background material on FOIA Exemption 2 is
contained in the Department of Justice’s FOIA Update, Vol. X, No. 3, at 3-4 (Protecting
Vulnerability Assessments Through Application of Exemption Two”), which is available at
http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_X_3/page3.html
Agencies should refer to the classification standards contained in Executive Order No. 12958
“Classified National Security Information” to determine whether information contained in the
internal CIP plan is classified. Section 1.5 of the Executive Order contains classification
categories that include:
United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials or facilities; or
vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations, projects or plans relating to the
national security
Questions concerning the attached reporting instructions should be referred to Kim Johnson, of
OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs’ Information Policy and Technology
Branch at (202) 395-7232 or [email protected].

Attachments:
A) HSPD-7 "Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization and Protection"
B) Format of Internal Department/Agency CIP Plans

1816

Dec. 17 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003

Sec. 3. Administration. This order shall be
transmitted to the Congress and published
in the Federal Register.
George W. Bush
The White House,
December 17, 2003.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register,
8:45 a.m., December 22, 2003]
NOTE: This Executive order will be published in
the Federal Register on December 23.

Letter to Congressional Leaders
Reporting on the Executive Order
Regarding Appointments During
National Emergency
December 17, 2003
Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)
Consistent with section 301 of the National
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1631), I hereby
report that I have taken additional steps with
respect to the national emergency I declared
in Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001,
by invoking and making available to the Secretary of Defense the emergency appointments authority of section 603 of title 10 of
the United States Code, consistent with the
terms of that statute and of Executive Order
12396 of December 9, 1982.
I am enclosing a copy of the Executive
Order I have issued, which is effective immediately.
Sincerely,
George W. Bush
NOTE: Identical letters were sent to J. Dennis
Hastert, Speaker of the House of Representatives,
and Richard B. Cheney, President of the Senate.

Directive on Critical Infrastructure
Identification, Prioritization, and
Protection
December 17, 2003
Homeland
HSPD–7

VerDate jul 14 2003

11:18 Dec 23, 2003

Security

Jkt 203250

Presidential

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Directive/

Fmt 1244

Subject: Critical Infrastructure
Identification, Prioritization, and Protection
Purpose
(1) This directive establishes a national
policy for Federal departments and agencies
to identify and prioritize United States critical infrastructure and key resources and to
protect them from terrorist attacks.
Background
(2) Terrorists seek to destroy, incapacitate,
or exploit critical infrastructure and key resources across the United States to threaten
national security, cause mass casualties,
weaken our economy, and damage public
morale and confidence.
(3) America’s open and technologically
complex society includes a wide array of critical infrastructure and key resources that are
potential terrorist targets. The majority of
these are owned and operated by the private
sector and State or local governments. These
critical infrastructures and key resources are
both physical and cyber-based and span all
sectors of the economy.
(4) Critical infrastructure and key resources provide the essential services that
underpin American society. The Nation possesses numerous key resources, whose exploitation or destruction by terrorists could
cause catastrophic health effects or mass casualties comparable to those from the use of
a weapon of mass destruction, or could profoundly affect our national prestige and morale. In addition, there is critical infrastructure so vital that its incapacitation, exploitation, or destruction, through terrorist attack, could have a debilitating effect on security and economic well-being.
(5) While it is not possible to protect or
eliminate the vulnerability of all critical infrastructure and key resources throughout the
country, strategic improvements in security
can make it more difficult for attacks to succeed and can lessen the impact of attacks
that may occur. In addition to strategic security enhancements, tactical security improvements can be rapidly implemented to deter,
mitigate, or neutralize potential attacks.

Sfmt 1244

E:\PRESDOCS\P51DET4.019

P51DET4

Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 / Dec. 17
Definitions
(6) In this directive:
(a) The term ‘‘critical infrastructure’’ has
the meaning given to that term in section 1016(e) of the USA PATRIOT
Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)).
(b) The term ‘‘key resources’’ has the
meaning given that term in section
2(9) of the Homeland Security Act of
2002 (6 U.S.C. 101(9)).
(c) The term ‘‘the Department’’ means
the Department of Homeland Security.
(d) The term ‘‘Federal departments and
agencies’’ means those executive departments enumerated in 5 U.S.C.
101, and the Department of Homeland Security; independent establishments as defined by 5 U.S.C. 104(1);
Government corporations as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 103(1); and the United
States Postal Service.
(e) The terms ‘‘State,’’ and ‘‘local government,’’ when used in a geographical
sense, have the same meanings given
to those terms in section 2 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6
U.S.C. 101).
(f) The term ‘‘the Secretary’’ means the
Secretary of Homeland Security.
(g) The term ‘‘Sector-Specific Agency’’
means a Federal department or agency responsible for infrastructure protection activities in a designated critical infrastructure sector or key resources category. Sector-Specific
Agencies will conduct their activities
under this directive in accordance
with guidance provided by the Secretary.
(h) The terms ‘‘protect’’ and ‘‘secure’’
mean reducing the vulnerability of
critical infrastructure or key resources
in order to deter, mitigate, or neutralize terrorist attacks.
Policy
(7) It is the policy of the United States
to enhance the protection of our Nation’s
critical infrastructure and key resources
against terrorist acts that could:

VerDate jul 14 2003

10:59 Dec 23, 2003

Jkt 203250

PO 00000

Frm 00023

Fmt 1244

1817

(a) cause catastrophic health effects or
mass casualties comparable to those
from the use of a weapon of mass destruction;
(b) impair Federal departments and
agencies’ abilities to perform essential
missions, or to ensure the public’s
health and safety;
(c) undermine State and local government capacities to maintain order and
to deliver minimum essential public
services;
(d) damage the private sector’s capability
to ensure the orderly functioning of
the economy and delivery of essential
services;
(e) have a negative effect on the economy
through the cascading disruption of
other critical infrastructure and key
resources; or
(f) undermine the public’s morale and
confidence in our national economic
and political institutions.
(8) Federal departments and agencies will
identify, prioritize, and coordinate the protection of critical infrastructure and key resources in order to prevent, deter, and mitigate the effects of deliberate efforts to destroy, incapacitate, or exploit them. Federal
departments and agencies will work with
State and local governments and the private
sector to accomplish this objective.
(9) Federal departments and agencies will
ensure that homeland security programs do
not diminish the overall economic security
of the United States.
(10) Federal departments and agencies
will appropriately protect information associated with carrying out this directive, including handling voluntarily provided information and information that would facilitate terrorist targeting of critical infrastructure and
key resources consistent with the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 and other applicable
legal authorities.
(11) Federal departments and agencies
shall implement this directive in a manner
consistent with applicable provisions of law,
including those protecting the rights of
United States persons.

Sfmt 1244

E:\PRESDOCS\P51DET4.019

P51DET4

1818

Dec. 17 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003

Roles and Responsibilities of the
Secretary
(12) In carrying out the functions assigned
in the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the
Secretary shall be responsible for coordinating the overall national effort to enhance
the protection of the critical infrastructure
and key resources of the United States. The
Secretary shall serve as the principal Federal
official to lead, integrate, and coordinate implementation of efforts among Federal departments and agencies, State and local governments, and the private sector to protect
critical infrastructure and key resources.
(13) Consistent with this directive, the
Secretary will identify, prioritize, and coordinate the protection of critical infrastructure
and key resources with an emphasis on critical infrastructure and key resources that
could be exploited to cause catastrophic
health effects or mass casualties comparable
to those from the use of a weapon of mass
destruction.
(14) The Secretary will establish uniform
policies, approaches, guidelines, and methodologies for integrating Federal infrastructure protection and risk management activities within and across sectors along with
metrics and criteria for related programs and
activities.
(15) The Secretary shall coordinate protection activities for each of the following critical
infrastructure sectors: information technology; telecommunications; chemical; transportation systems, including mass transit,
aviation, maritime, ground/surface, and rail
and pipeline systems; emergency services;
and postal and shipping. The Department
shall coordinate with appropriate departments and agencies to ensure the protection
of other key resources including dams, government facilities, and commercial facilities.
In addition, in its role as overall cross-sector
coordinator, the Department shall also evaluate the need for and coordinate the coverage
of additional critical infrastructure and key
resources categories over time, as appropriate.
(16) The Secretary will continue to maintain an organization to serve as a focal point
for the security of cyberspace. The organization will facilitate interactions and collaborations between and among Federal depart-

VerDate jul 14 2003

01:13 Dec 23, 2003

Jkt 203250

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 1244

ments and agencies, State and local governments, the private sector, academia and
international organizations. To the extent
permitted by law, Federal departments and
agencies with cyber expertise, including but
not limited to the Departments of Justice,
Commerce, the Treasury, Defense, Energy,
and State, and the Central Intelligence Agency, will collaborate with and support the organization in accomplishing its mission. The
organization’s mission includes analysis,
warning, information sharing, vulnerability
reduction, mitigation, and aiding national recovery efforts for critical infrastructure information systems. The organization will support the Department of Justice and other law
enforcement agencies in their continuing
missions to investigate and prosecute threats
to and attacks against cyberspace, to the extent permitted by law.
(17) The Secretary will work closely with
other Federal departments and agencies,
State and local governments, and the private
sector in accomplishing the objectives of this
directive.
Roles and Responsibilities of SectorSpecific Federal Agencies
(18) Recognizing that each infrastructure
sector possesses its own unique characteristics and operating models, there are designated Sector-Specific Agencies, including:
(a) Department of Agriculture—agriculture, food (meat, poultry, egg
products);
(b) Health and Human Services—public
health, healthcare, and food (other
than meat, poultry, egg products);
(c) Environmental Protection Agency—
drinking water and water treatment
systems;
(d) Department of Energy—energy, including the production refining, storage, and distribution of oil and gas,
and electric power except for commercial nuclear power facilities;
(e) Department of the Treasury—banking and finance;
(f) Department of the Interior—national
monuments and icons; and
(g) Department of Defense—defense industrial base.

Sfmt 1244

E:\PRESDOCS\P51DET4.019

P51DET4

Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 / Dec. 17
(19) In accordance with guidance provided
by the Secretary, Sector-Specific Agencies
shall:
(a) collaborate with all relevant Federal
departments and agencies, State and
local governments, and the private
sector, including with key persons and
entities in their infrastructure sector;
(b) conduct or facilitate vulnerability assessments of the sector; and
(c) encourage risk management strategies to protect against and mitigate
the effects of attacks against critical
infrastructure and key resources.
(20) Nothing in this directive alters, or impedes the ability to carry out, the authorities
of the Federal departments and agencies to
perform their responsibilities under law and
consistent with applicable legal authorities
and presidential guidance.
(21) Federal departments and agencies
shall cooperate with the Department in implementing this directive, consistent with the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 and other
applicable legal authorities.
Roles and Responsibilities of Other
Departments, Agencies, and Offices
(22) In addition to the responsibilities
given the Department and Sector-Specific
Agencies, there are special functions of various Federal departments and agencies and
components of the Executive Office of the
President related to critical infrastructure
and key resources protection.
(a) The Department of State, in conjunction with the Department, and the
Departments of Justice, Commerce,
Defense, the Treasury and other appropriate agencies, will work with foreign countries and international organizations to strengthen the protection
of United States critical infrastructure
and key resources.
(b) The Department of Justice, including
the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
will reduce domestic terrorist threats,
and investigate and prosecute actual
or attempted terrorist attacks on, sabotage of, or disruptions of critical infrastructure and key resources. The
Attorney General and the Secretary
shall use applicable statutory author-

VerDate jul 14 2003

01:13 Dec 23, 2003

Jkt 203250

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 1244

1819

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Sfmt 1244

ity and attendant mechanisms for cooperation and coordination, including
but not limited to those established
by presidential directive.
The Department of Commerce, in
coordination with the Department,
will work with private sector, research, academic, and government organizations to improve technology for
cyber systems and promote other critical infrastructure efforts, including
using its authority under the Defense
Production Act to assure the timely
availability of industrial products, materials, and services to meet homeland
security requirements.
A Critical Infrastructure Protection
Policy Coordinating Committee will
advise the Homeland Security Council on interagency policy related to
physical and cyber infrastructure protection. This PCC will be chaired by
a Federal officer or employee designated by the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security.
The Office of Science and Technology Policy, in coordination with
the Department, will coordinate
interagency research and development to enhance the protection of
critical infrastructure and key resources.
The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) shall oversee the implementation of government-wide
policies, principles, standards, and
guidelines for Federal government
computer security programs. The Director of OMB will ensure the operation of a central Federal information
security incident center consistent
with the requirements of the Federal
Information Security Management
Act of 2002.
Consistent with the E-Government
Act of 2002, the Chief Information
Officers Council shall be the principal
interagency forum for improving
agency practices related to the design,
acquisition, development, modernization, use, operation, sharing, and performance of information resources of
Federal departments and agencies.

E:\PRESDOCS\P51DET4.019

P51DET4

1820

Dec. 17 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003

(h) The Department of Transportation
and the Department will collaborate
on all matters relating to transportation security and transportation infrastructure protection. The Department of Transportation is responsible
for operating the national air space
system. The Department of Transportation and the Department will collaborate in regulating the transportation of hazardous materials by all
modes (including pipelines).
(i) All Federal departments and agencies
shall work with the sectors relevant
to their responsibilities to reduce the
consequences of catastrophic failures
not caused by terrorism.
(23) The heads of all Federal departments
and agencies will coordinate and cooperate
with the Secretary as appropriate and consistent with their own responsibilities for protecting critical infrastructure and key resources.
(24) All Federal department and agency
heads are responsible for the identification,
prioritization, assessment, remediation, and
protection of their respective internal critical
infrastructure and key resources. Consistent
with the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002, agencies will identify
and provide information security protections
commensurate with the risk and magnitude
of the harm resulting from the unauthorized
access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information.
Coordination with the Private Sector
(25) In accordance with applicable laws or
regulations, the Department and the SectorSpecific Agencies will collaborate with appropriate private sector entities and continue
to encourage the development of information
sharing and analysis mechanisms. Additionally, the Department and Sector-Specific
Agencies shall collaborate with the private
sector and continue to support sector-coordinating mechanisms:
(a) to identify, prioritize, and coordinate
the protection of critical infrastructure and key resources; and
(b) to facilitate sharing of information
about physical and cyber threats,
vulnerabilities, incidents, potential

VerDate jul 14 2003

01:13 Dec 23, 2003

Jkt 203250

PO 00000

Frm 00026

Fmt 1244

protective measures, and best practices.
National Special Security Events
(26) The Secretary, after consultation with
the Homeland Security Council, shall be responsible for designating events as ‘‘National
Special Security Events’’ (NSSEs). This directive supersedes language in previous presidential directives regarding the designation
of NSSEs that is inconsistent herewith.
Implementation
(27) Consistent with the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the Secretary shall produce
a comprehensive, integrated National Plan
for Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources
Protection to outline national goals, objectives, milestones, and key initiatives within
1 year from the issuance of this directive.
The Plan shall include, in addition to other
Homeland Security-related elements as the
Secretary deems appropriate, the following
elements:
(a) a strategy to identify, prioritize, and
coordinate the protection of critical
infrastructure and key resources, including how the Department intends
to work with Federal departments
and agencies, State and local governments, the private sector, and foreign
countries and international organizations;
(b) a summary of activities to be undertaken in order to: define and
prioritize, reduce the vulnerability of,
and coordinate the protection of critical infrastructure and key resources;
(c) a summary of initiatives for sharing
critical infrastructure and key resources information and for providing
critical infrastructure and key resources threat warning data to State
and local governments and the private
sector; and
(d) coordination and integration, as appropriate, with other Federal emergency management and preparedness
activities including the National Response Plan and applicable national
preparedness goals.
(28) The Secretary, consistent with the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 and other

Sfmt 1244

E:\PRESDOCS\P51DET4.019

P51DET4

Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 / Dec. 17
applicable legal authorities and presidential
guidance, shall establish appropriate systems,
mechanisms, and procedures to share homeland security information relevant to threats
and vulnerabilities in national critical infrastructure and key resources with other Federal departments and agencies, State and
local governments, and the private sector in
a timely manner.
(29) The Secretary will continue to work
with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
and, as appropriate, the Department of Energy in order to ensure the necessary protection of:
(a) commercial nuclear reactors for generating electric power and non-power
nuclear reactors used for research,
testing, and training;
(b) nuclear materials in medical, industrial, and academic settings and facilities that fabricate nuclear fuel; and
(c) the transportation, storage, and disposal of nuclear materials and waste.
(30) In coordination with the Director of
the Office of Science and Technology Policy,
the Secretary shall prepare on an annual basis
a Federal Research and Development Plan
in support of this directive.
(31) The Secretary will collaborate with
other appropriate Federal departments and
agencies to develop a program, consistent
with applicable law, to geospatially map,
image, analyze, and sort critical infrastructure and key resources by utilizing commercial satellite and airborne systems, and existing capabilities within other agencies. National technical means should be considered
as an option of last resort. The Secretary,
with advice from the Director of Central Intelligence, the Secretaries of Defense and the
Interior, and the heads of other appropriate
Federal departments and agencies, shall develop mechanisms for accomplishing this initiative. The Attorney General shall provide
legal advice as necessary.
(32) The Secretary will utilize existing, and
develop new, capabilities as needed to model
comprehensively the potential implications
of terrorist exploitation of vulnerabilities in
critical infrastructure and key resources,
placing specific focus on densely populated
areas. Agencies with relevant modeling capabilities shall cooperate with the Secretary to

VerDate jul 14 2003

01:13 Dec 23, 2003

Jkt 203250

PO 00000

Frm 00027

Fmt 1244

1821

develop appropriate mechanisms for accomplishing this initiative.
(33) The Secretary will develop a national
indications and warnings architecture for infrastructure protection and capabilities that
will facilitate:
(a) an understanding of baseline infrastructure operations;
(b) the identification of indicators and
precursors to an attack; and
(c) a surge capacity for detecting and
analyzing patterns of potential attacks.
In developing a national indications and
warnings architecture, the Department will
work with Federal, State, local, and non-governmental entities to develop an integrated
view of physical and cyber infrastructure and
key resources.
(34) By July 2004, the heads of all Federal
departments and agencies shall develop and
submit to the Director of the OMB for approval plans for protecting the physical and
cyber critical infrastructure and key resources that they own or operate. These
plans
shall
address
identification,
prioritization, protection, and contingency
planning, including the recovery and reconstitution of essential capabilities.
(35) On an annual basis, the Sector-Specific Agencies shall report to the Secretary
on their efforts to identify, prioritize, and coordinate the protection of critical infrastructure and key resources in their respective
sectors. The report shall be submitted within
1 year from the issuance of this directive and
on an annual basis thereafter.
(36) The Assistant to the President for
Homeland Security and the Assistant to the
President for National Security Affairs will
lead a national security and emergency preparedness communications policy review,
with the heads of the appropriate Federal
departments and agencies, related to convergence and next generation architecture.
Within 6 months after the issuance of this
directive, the Assistant to the President for
Homeland Security and the Assistant to the
President for National Security Affairs shall
submit for my consideration any recommended changes to such policy.
(37) This directive supersedes Presidential
Decision Directive/NSC–63 of May 22, 1998
(‘‘Critical Infrastructure Protection’’), and

Sfmt 1244

E:\PRESDOCS\P51DET4.019

P51DET4

1822

Dec. 17 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003

any Presidential directives issued prior to this
directive to the extent of any inconsistency.
Moreover, the Assistant to the President for
Homeland Security and the Assistant to the
President for National Security Affairs shall
jointly submit for my consideration a Presidential directive to make changes in Presidential directives issued prior to this date
that conform such directives to this directive.
(38) This directive is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive branch of the Federal Government, and
it is not intended to, and does not, create
any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against
the United States, its departments, agencies,
or other entities, its officers or employees,
or any other person.
George W. Bush

(c)

(d)

Directive on National Preparedness
December 17, 2003
Homeland Security Presidential Directive/
HSPD–8

Subject: National Preparedness
Purpose
(1) This directive establishes policies to
strengthen the preparedness of the United
States to prevent and respond to threatened
or actual domestic terrorist attacks, major
disasters, and other emergencies by requiring
a national domestic all-hazards preparedness
goal, establishing mechanisms for improved
delivery of Federal preparedness assistance
to State and local governments, and outlining
actions to strengthen preparedness capabilities of Federal, State, and local entities.

(e)

(f)

Definitions
(2) For the purposes of this directive:
(a) The term ‘‘all-hazards preparedness’’

refers to preparedness for domestic

terrorist attacks, major disasters, and

other emergencies.

(b) The term ‘‘Federal departments and
agencies’’ means those executive de-

partments enumerated in 5 U.S.C.

101, and the Department of Home-

land Security; independent establish-

VerDate jul 14 2003

01:13 Dec 23, 2003

Jkt 203250

PO 00000

Frm 00028

Fmt 1244

(g)

Sfmt 1244

ments as defined by 5 U.S.C. 104(1);
Government corporations as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 103(1); and the United
States Postal Service.
The term ‘‘Federal preparedness assistance’’ means Federal department
and agency grants, cooperative agreements, loans, loan guarantees, training, and/or technical assistance provided to State and local governments
and the private sector to prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from
terrorist attacks, major disasters, and
other emergencies. Unless noted otherwise, the term ‘‘assistance’’ will
refer to Federal assistance programs.
The term ‘‘first responder’’ refers to
those individuals who in the early
stages of an incident are responsible
for the protection and preservation of
life, property, evidence, and the environment, including emergency response providers as defined in section
2 of the Homeland Security Act of
2002 (6 U.S.C. 101), as well as emergency management, public health,
clinical care, public works, and other
skilled support personnel (such as
equipment operators) that provide
immediate support services during
prevention, response, and recovery
operations.
The terms ‘‘major disaster’’ and
‘‘emergency’’ have the meanings
given in section 102 of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
5122).
The term ‘‘major events’’ refers to domestic terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies.
The term ‘‘national homeland security
preparedness-related exercises’’ refers to homeland security-related exercises that train and test national decision makers and utilize resources of
multiple Federal departments and
agencies. Such exercises may involve
State and local first responders when
appropriate. Such exercises do not include those exercises conducted solely within a single Federal department
or agency.

E:\PRESDOCS\P51DET4.019

P51DET4

Attachment B
Format of Internal Department/Agency CIP Plan

Agencies shall use the following definitions to identify Critical Infrastructure and Key
Resources:
Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources
Under the Homeland Security Act, which references the definition in the PATRIOT Act, the
term ‘critical infrastructure’ (CI) means “systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so
vital to the United States that the incapacity or destruction of such systems and assets would have
a debilitating impact on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or
any combination of those matters.” The term ‘key resources’ (KR) means “publicly or privately
controlled resources essential to the minimal operations of the economy and government.”
These definitions are broad and must remain so, to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility to
the federal agencies and departments, state and local governments, and the private sector. This
flexibility will enable these stakeholders to use their informed judgment in planning for the
protection of critical infrastructure and key resources. To ensure consistency, this guidance
provides more detailed descriptions of certain terms to assist agencies in developing and
implementing their plans.
An infrastructure is a collection of assets. As used in this document, an asset is something of
importance or value, and can include people, property (both tangible and intangible),
information, systems, and equipment. A system, which is one type of asset, is a collection of
resources made up of any combination of people, physical attributes (e.g., location, structure,
etc.), or cyber components that perform a process.
Key resources represent individual targets whose destruction could cause large-scale injury,
death, or destruction of property and /or profound damage to our national prestige and
confidence. Key resources include such facilities as nuclear power plants, dams, government
facilities, and commercial facilities.
An infrastructure is considered critical, or resource is considered key, if its destruction or
damage causes significant impact on the security of the nation– national economic security,
national public health, safety, psychology, or any combination.
An infrastructure or resource is considered mission critical if its damage or destruction would
have a debilitating impact on the ability of the organization to perform its essential functions and
activities.
The terms protect and secure, as defined in HSPD-7, mean reducing the vulnerability of CI/KR
by deterring, mitigating, or neutralizing terrorist attacks. Thus, as used in this guidance,

protection includes all activities to identify CI/KR, assess vulnerabilities, prioritize CI/KR, and
develop protective programs and measures, since these activities lead to the final act of
implementing such protective strategies to reduce vulnerability. Protective actions include
detection mechanisms or programs (e.g. surveillance systems that indicate a potential threat),
deterrence actions (e.g., enhanced security that reduces the aggressor’s likelihood of success and
interest in the target); defensive actions (e.g., physical hardening or buffer zones, that prevent or
delay an attack); and actions that reduce the value or incentive to an aggressor to attack (e.g.,
creating redundancies in a system and recovery programs that minimize consequences).
Strategies for response and recovery are also important.

Format of July 31, 2004 reports

Departments/Agencies should provide one report that speaks to enterprise-wide priorities
and mission.
Part I. Describe existing capability, to include current personnel and budget, for
protecting Federal critical infrastructure and key resources
Note: In order to meet the objectives of these internal CIP plans, Departments and Agencies
should first focus attention on identifying and reporting their current capabilities to protect
critical infrastructure and key resources that they own or operate. Thereafter, D/As should
develop and implement plans to close any gaps in current capabilities. OMB will not be able to
approve internal CIP plans until all information is provided.
1.

Background and introduction:
• summary of the primary business functions and activities of the D/A;
• summary of management structure of the organization, including responsibilities for
internal CI/KR protection, information security, physical security, personnel security,
and continuity of operations programs and activities;
• summary of the locations and assets (including contractor assets) that support the
primary business functions and activities of the organization.

2. Identify current capabilities for protecting internal CI/KR, covering the following activities:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Ability to identify Federally owned or operated (to include leased) CIR/KR assets
Ability to assess the vulnerabilities and interdependencies among assets
Ability to prioritize among Federal assets based on vulnerability, consequence,
and threat information;
Overall capability to adequately protect against threats to Federal CI/KR assets;
Overall capability to respond to, and recover from, events that impair the ability
to perform mission critical functions at or using Federal CI/KR assets .
Ability to identify gaps in carrying out any of the activities discussed above.

3.
Please identify the process for determining budget and personnel requirements for CI/KR
protection, response, and reconstitution activities. Does the D/A’s FY04 appropriation and FY05
budget request include specific programs to protect the D/A’s critical infrastructure? D/As
should use the attached table to identify their CIP activities by appropriation account, along with
their FY04 enacted and FY05 proposed resource levels. Attachment C includes funding levels
for Critical Infrastructure Protection programs reported in the FY 2005 Homeland Security and
Overseas Combating Terrorism Database and as part of the overall budget data collected in
support of the FY 2005 budget development via MAX A-11. Your response to this
memorandum must be consistent with the data submitted in previous collections. Small and

independent agencies may not have previously provided OMB with funding levels for CIP
programs. For additional information, please see the note below:
Program/
Activity Name

Account
Name

OMB Account
Code

FY 2004
Enacted

FY 2005
Request

NOTE: Section 25.5 of OMB Circular A-11 (along with separate instructions) requires
agencies to submit activity-level information for homeland security activities. This includes
agency reporting on critical infrastructure protection activities and the broader National
Strategy for Homeland Security Protecting Critical Infrastructure and Key Assets (PCKIA)
mission area. In your July response to this memorandum, program and funding data should be
consistent with the data that your agency reported in response to A-11. For example, your
agency does not have to report every activity included in its A-11 response -- in fact, it should
not, because those responses include activities focused outside the agency -- but for the
activities that are included in response to both requests, the funding estimates should be the
same. Your detailed response to A-11 for the FY06 Budget should include the set of activities
provided in response to this memorandum, consistent funding estimates, and detailed activity
level data.
4.Describe the process for ensuring independent oversight of CIP programs. Discuss whether the
GAO or IG has conducted a review of CIP programs. If so, when were these reviews conducted?
Were corrective actions identified and follow on actions taken by the Department/agency? Are
corrective actions for IT systems considered critical infrastructure included in Federal
Information Security Management Act (FISMA) plans of action and milestones?

Part II: List CI/KR owned or operated by the Department/Agency and Long Term
Protection Strategy
Note: If Departments and agencies are not able to collect and report on the information
requested below by July 31st, please provide anticipated timeframes for providing this
information.
1. Please attach the prioritized list of internal Department/agency critical infrastructure and key
resources. (Prioritization should be conducted based on an analysis and normalization of the
risk data – i.e. vulnerability and consequences. See DHS’ Guidance for Developing SectorSpecific Plans, Chapter 4 language on “Assessing Vulnerabilities and Prioritizing Assets”)
2. Has the Department/agency developed a long term protective strategy to protect the critical
infrastructure and key resources identified above and coordinated sufficiently with other
entities, where applicable? Has the IG reviewed this plan? If so, when did this review
occur? If weaknesses in the plan were identified, have corrective actions been taken? (See
DHS’ Guidance for Developing Sector-Specific Plans, Chapter 4 language on “Process for
Developing Protective Programs”)
3. Has the agency designed and implemented performance metrics for the CIP program? If so,
please provide a copy of the metrics. Activities should be measured both by outputs and by
outcomes. Agencies should use the metrics as a basis for improving program activities and
reallocating resources as needed. (See DHS’ Guidance for Developing Sector-Specific
Plans, Chapter 4 language on “Measuring Progress”)
4.

Describe the status of all major initiatives that are underway or planned for addressing
deficiencies including:
• Improvements to capability to protect critical infrastructure and key resources;
• Improvements to capability to respond to and recover from events that impair the
ability to perform organization essential functions by using critical infrastructure or
key resources

5.

Indicate milestones for the initiatives described above. Provide the name of the assigned
manager and target date for completing each milestone.

6.

Are there specific management, technical, or operational challenges that must be
overcome with regard to implementation of the Department/agency’s CIP plan? How
will the agency address these challenges?