Attachment 4_YEARS Program observation protocol - Updated Oct 2016

Observation Checklist_Reformat 10.4.16.xlsx

Youth Education and Relationship Services (YEARS)

Attachment 4_YEARS Program observation protocol - Updated Oct 2016

OMB: 0970-0470

Document [xlsx]
Download: xlsx | pdf

Overview

General Info.
Sections A-B
Section C
Section D
Section E-1
Section E-2
Section F
Section G
Sections H-I
Sections J-K


Sheet 1: General Info.

HMRE Program Observation Checklist

Program Name: Observer Name:

Session duration: Strategies observed (check all that apply):

Time of day session took place (AM/PM):





# of staff: Lecture
Small-group activity

Staff are peers/near peers (Yes/No) :
Video
Social media

Staff are adults (Yes/No):
Role-play
Internet

# of participants: Class discussion
Other (describe):

Group is predominantly male/predominantly female/mixed: Small-group discussion



Sheet 2: Sections A-B

A. Staff is representative of [observed] population served (i.e., gender, race/ethnicity, language) Yes No Notes
1 Gender: staff represented all genders present in the group.



2 Race/ethnicity: staff were from the same racial and/or ethnic background as the predominant groups of youth in the program.



3 Language: staff were fluent in the language that program participants spoke.



B. Program space Yes No

1 Program space was clean and well-maintained.



2 Meeting space is informal. This means that participants sit in a circle or gather in different parts of the room, rather than sitting in rows, participants can get up and move around, the meeting space is colorful and has youth-friendly posters and other materials around the room.



3 There was enough furniture for the number of participants and type of activities.













Sheet 3: Section C

C. HMRE topics covered during this session Information was presented Notes related to topic?
Major focus

(topic is the main focus of the lesson, or ties heavily into the lesson, or is brought up repeatedly throughout the session, and/or leads to a focused discussion when raised)
Minor focus

(topic is mentioned once or twice, but is not the main focus on the lesson)

Healthy romantic relationships



Sexual activity



Violence/abuse prevention - including physical, sexual, and emotional/psychological



Gender and sexuality



Parenting/co-parenting



Communication



Social skills



Conflict management



Financial management



Career goals



Educational goals



Housing



Marriage and cohabitation



Extended family relationships



Any skills were practiced (Yes/No)




If able to specify, note the types of skills practiced:




Sheet 4: Section D

D. Physical and psychological safety Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes

SESSION






1 The emotional climate of the session was predominantly positive. This was characterized by teamwork, inclusiveness, and an absence of negative youth and staff behaviors such as derogatory comments or bullying.







STAFF






2 Staff interacted with youth in a respectful manner. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


3 Staff members proactively resolved conflicts among youth. Staff helped youth to examine the relationship between their actions and subsequent consequences. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


4 Staff members maintained a safe and respectful environment. There was mutual respect for, and inclusion of, others of different religions, ethnicities, classes, genders, abilities, appearances, and sexual orientations.






5 Staff members enforced ground rules for program participation. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


6 If anyone made derogatory comments about race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or disability , instructors addressed it immediately and made it clear that such behavior is unacceptable. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


D. Physical and psychological safety Yes No


7 Staff members reviewed or referenced ground rules for program participation.



Sheet 5: Section E-1

E. Appropriate structure Yes No Notes

SESSION



1 Session started within 5 minutes of scheduled time.



2 Session ended within 5 minutes of scheduled time.




STAFF



3 The session had a staff to participant ratio of 1:15.



4a Staff warmly greeted (at least 50% of) youth.



4b Staff greeted (at least 50% of) youth by name.



4c Staff smiled at (at least 50% of) youth as they entered.




YOUTH



5a Participants received incentives for participation.



5b List the types of incentives



5c Participants received refreshments.



5d Refreshments were healthy.



E. Appropriate structure Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes

SESSION






6a All necessary materials were prepared in advance.






6b Materials were available in sufficient quantities.






7 There was sufficient time to complete the lesson.






8 If the program serves a specific target population. (e.g., foster youth, juvenile justice, etc.), the content was inclusive of the population






9 Program content appeared to be developed with youth in mind (versus adults). This means scenarios were youth-friendly, activities were catered to youth versus adults, and content was at an appropriate developmental and comprehension level for youth in the session.






10 Youth appeared to be able to understand the materials.






E. Appropriate structure Yes No Notes
11 Staff assigned homework.




Sheet 6: Section E-2

E. Appropriate structure Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes

STAFF






12 Staff explained the goals of and objectives for the lesson clearly. NOT EXPLAINED EXPLAINED BUT NOT CLEAR EXPLAINED AND CLEAR, BUT NOT RELATED TO WHAT WAS DONE EXPLAINED AND CLEAR, RELATED TO WHAT WAS DONE


13 Staff stated expectations for participation at the beginning of activities. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


14 Staff explained the rationale for all rules or requests. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


15 Staff explicitly drew connections between the current lesson and previous lessons.






16 Staff delivered content in an engaging manner. This means activities that involved skill-building included guided practice for at least half of the skill-building time; staff provided structured opportunities to discuss what the youth were doing in the session and what they were thinking about (e.g., small group feedback); activities balanced concrete experiences (e.g., field trip or creative writing) with abstract learning (e.g., lecture, diagrams, or group discussion). NO ENGAGING PRACTICES ONE OF THREE ENGAGING PRACTICES TWO OF THREE ENGAGING PRACTICES ALL THREE ENGAGING PRACTICES


17 Staff used technology and/or social media to engage youth and/or deliver content. (If technology and/or social media is used, note what was used, and how) NO TECH AVAILABLE NO TECH USED TO ENGAGE OR DELIVER TO ENGAGE AND DELIVER


18 Staff were knowledgeable about the program. (This means staff were very familiar with the concepts and answered questions with ease) ANSWERED ALMOST NO QS ANSWERED FEW QS ANSWERED MOST QS ANSWERED ALL QS (ACCURATELY)


19 Staff delivered the curriculum with confidence. (This means staff did not hesitate in addressing questions and concerns. Staff were well organized and not nervous) MANY NOTES AND DISORGANIZED MANY NOTES AND/OR DISORGANIZED FEW NOTES AND WELL ORGANIZED NO NOTES AND WELL ORGANIZED



YOUTH






20 Youth were engaged with the content and materials NO YOUTH SOME YOUTH MOST YOUTH ALL YOUTH


21 Youth actively participated in discussions and activities.






22 Youth had a chance to ask questions about topics or issues that came up during the session.






23 Youth engaged in positive, friendly interactions with each other. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS
















Sheet 7: Section F

F. Supportive relationships Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes

STAFF






1 Staff responded to youth's questions in a nonjudgmental manner. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


2 Staff appeared to be comfortable discussing sensitive topics, such as sexuality and relationships, in a nonjudgmental manner. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


3 Staff members modeled healthy relationships in their interactions with youth (for example, communication and listening skills, conflict management skills, and social skills.)






4 Staff engaged in conversations with youth and asked youth questions in a supportive manner.






5 Staff members encouraged all youth to participate in a respectful manner.






6 Staff respected participants' right to privacy when discussing personal or sensitive topics. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


7 Staff maintained professional boundaries when they interacted with youth. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS



YOUTH






8 Youth freely engaged in conversations with staff.







Sheet 8: Section G

G. Opportunities to belong Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes

SESSION






1 Program materials (e.g., videos, posters, handouts, recruitment materials, etc.) were representative of the youth, including representations of LGBTQ youth, youth with disabilities, and youth from various racial and ethnic backgrounds, when relevant. NEITHER MATERIALS ONLY CONTENT ONLY MATERIALS AND CONTENT


2 Staff and materials used LGBTQ-inclusive terms to describe relationships. (See note below) NO INCLUSIVE TERMS USED USED INCONSISTENTLY INCLUSIVE LANGUAGE AFFIRMITIVE LANGUAGE


3 Materials and content were available in languages other than English when appropriate.






4 The staff's efforts to create a "group identity" were apparent. (e.g., shared traditions, shared language, or group name)







STAFF






5 Staff asked youth for ideas and suggestions.






6 Staff provided opportunities for youth to get to know one another through icebreakers or other team-building activities.






7 Staff explicitly recognized the achievements and/or contributions of at least some participants.






G. Opportunities to belong Yes No




8 Staff provided opportunities for youth to work together.





G. Opportunities to belong Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes

YOUTH






9 Youth encouraged one another's participation in activities.






10 Youth held one another accountable for meeting program expectations.






11 Youth use ownership language, e.g. refer to the program as "ours", shared jokes, gestures, and traditions. NEVER RARELY OFTEN ALWAYS


Note on "Inclusive Language" and " Affirmative Language": Inclusive language is when facilitators avoid using heteronormative terms that might make LGBTQ youth feel left out. For example, staff might say "partner" instead of boyfriend/girlfriend or "they" instead of he/she. The intention is not to exclude LGBTQ youth. Affirmative language goes a step further and explicitly addresses LGBTQ youth and their needs. For example, affirmative programs might use LGBTQ individuals/couples in examples of positive relationships. They might include sexual health information that is particularly relevant to LGBTQ populations to ensure that LGBTQ youth find the content to be directly related their own relationships, like including information about anal sex along with information about vaginal sex.






Sheet 9: Sections H-I

H. Positive social norms Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes

STAFF






1 When discussing relationships, staff members valued diverse relationships and family types.






2 Staff members encouraged youth to engage in respectful discussions, even when they disagreed. (This can be N/A, if youth engage respectfully without encouragement or reinforcement for staff)






3 Staff encouraged youth to consider how to engage with social media and other forms of communication in a respectful manner.






4 Staff encouraged youth to seek help when needed, including issues around abuse and mental health. (This can be N/A, if the issue does not concern the safety of youth)






I. Support for efficacy and mattering Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes
1 Staff provided opportunities for youth to take a leadership role.






2 Staff provided opportunities for youth assist their peers when appropriate. (This can be N/A, if there was not an opportunity for peers to assist each other)






3 Staff encouraged youth to consider how to make a difference in their own community. (This can N/A, if lesson content does not lend itself to talk about how it relates to community involvement)






4 Staff engaged youth in conversations about achieving their goals and referred youth to relevant resources when appropriate.






5 Staff provided youth with opportunities to reflect on what they have learned. (This can be N/A, but note why--i.e. ran out of time, homework wasn't given, etc.)






6 Staff allowed youth to make at least one choice about the process related to the activities during the program session. (e.g. youth decide who presents, order of activities, who leads an activity, what materials to use)







Sheet 10: Sections J-K

J. Opportunities for skill-building Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A Notes
1 Staff made explicit mention of the skills that were targeted.






2 Staff broke difficult tasks into smaller, easier steps.






3 Staff provided opportunities for most youth to practice skills during the lesson.






4 Staff responded appropriately to youth who were struggling.






5 Staff helped youth make connections between the skills that were taught and their ability to achieve their goals related to relationships, education, and careers.






6 Staff discussed how youth can use the skills that were taught in relevant, real-world situations.






K. Integration of family, school, and community Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree N/A

1 Staff referenced other relevant community resources/programs.






2 Staff helped youth to make connections between program content and their own lives.






3 Staff encouraged youth to have discussions with family members or adult caregivers about the program content.






File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy