FERC-923 supporting statement (updated 1-19-2017)v4_Final

FERC-923 supporting statement (updated 1-19-2017)v4_Final.docx

FERC-923, Communication of Operational Information between Natural Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission Operators

OMB: 1902-0265

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

FERC-923 (OMB Control No. 1902-0265)

(Updated 1-19-2017)

Supporting Statement for

FERC-923, Communication of Operational Information

between Natural Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission Operators


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) requests that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve FERC-923 (Communication of Operational Information between Natural Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission Operators) (OMB Control No. 1902-0265), for a three-year period.


In Order No. 787, the Commission amended its regulations to provide explicit authority to interstate natural gas pipelines and public utilities that own, operate, or control facilities used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce to share non-public, operational information with each other for the purpose of promoting reliable service or operational planning on either the public utility’s or pipeline’s system. FERC-923 is an existing data collection with reporting requirement in 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 284.12 and 38.2.


1. CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MAKE THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION NECESSARY


In recent years, reliance on natural gas as a fuel for electric generation has steadily increased. This trend is expected to continue into the future, resulting in greater interdependence between the natural gas and electric industries. Several events over the last few years1 demonstrated the crucial interconnection between natural gas pipelines and electric transmission operators and the need for robust communication between these industry sectors to ensure that both systems operate safely and effectively for the benefit of their customers.


The applicable regulations are in 18 CFR:

  • Part 38.2 which applies to any public utility that owns, operates, or controls facilities used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce subject to a No-Conduit Rule, and

  • Part 284.12(b)(4) which applies to any interstate pipeline.

These sections (Parts 38.2 and 284.12(b)(4)) authorize public utilities providing transmission service and interstate natural gas pipelines to share non-public, operational information when such information is for the purpose of promoting reliable service or operational planning.


  1. HOW, BY WHOM AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE IS THE INFORMATION USED AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT COLLECTING THE INFORMATION


Note that this non-public information will be communicated and shared between transmission operators and is not being submitted to FERC.


Entities from both electric and natural gas industries have already begun efforts to improve coordination and enhanced system reliability by sharing non-public, operational information and continued sharing of non-public, operational information between transmission operators should continue to enhance system reliability and contingency planning in both industries. The information sharing and communications between industry entities are voluntary; there are restrictions on providing the non-public information to third parties or marketing entities.


  1. DESCRIBE ANY CONSIDERATION OF THE USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN AND THE TECHNICAL OR LEGAL OBSTACLES TO REDUCING BURDEN


In its Order No. 787, FERC removed actual or perceived impediments to the information sharing and communications of non-public, operational data between transmission operators. The permitted communications are voluntary. FERC is not prescribing the content, medium, format, or frequency for the information sharing and communications; those decisions will be made by the transmission operators, depending on their needs for maintaining reliability or operational planning. As such, no physical or electronic form for the FERC-923 information collection exists.



  1. DESCRIBE EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATON AND SHOW SPECIFICALLY WHY ANY SIMILAR INFORMATION ALREADY AVAILABLE CANNOT BE USED OR MODIFIED FOR USE FOR THE PURPOSE(S) DESCRIBED IN INSTRUCTION NO. 2.


The operational information the transmission operators may choose to share is non-public and in many cases current or time-sensitive operational data. The tariff filings are generally public. The information is not publicly available elsewhere.


  1. METHODS USED TO MINIMIZE BURDEN IN COLLECTION OF INFORMATION INVOLVING SMALL ENTITIES


The information sharing is voluntary (regardless of size) and between transmission operators that believe sharing the non-public, operational information is useful for the purposes of reliability and operational planning.


None of the entities impacted by FERC-923 are “small”.


  1. CONSEQUENCE TO FEDERAL PROGRAM IF COLLECTION WERE CONDUCTED LESS FREQUENTLY


The frequency and content of the information being shared is not mandated by FERC; rather it is determined by the affected entities based on operational circumstances. (FERC, however, estimates the frequency of this information sharing to be 12 times per year, based on operational circumstances and needs.) The goal of the inter-industry communications is to promote operational planning and reliability on either the interstate natural gas pipeline’s or utility’s system.


The requirement to submit the tariff filing to FERC enabled the transmission operators to have these inter-industry communications to improve operational planning and reliability on either the interstate natural gas pipeline’s or utility’s system.


  1. EXPLAIN ANY SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE INFORMATION


There are no special circumstances.


  1. DESCRIBE EFFORTS TO CONSULT OUTSIDE THE AGENCY: SUMMARIZE PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THE AGENCY’S RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS


In accordance with OMB requirements, the Commission published a 60-day notice2 and a 30-day notice3 to the public regarding this information collection on 8/16/2016 and 10/24/2016, respectively. Within the public notice, the Commission noted that it would be requesting a three-year extension of the public reporting burden with no change to the existing requirements concerning the collection of data. The Commission received no comments.


  1. EXPLAIN ANY PAYMENT OR GIFTS TO RESPONDENTS


There are no payments or gifts to respondents of this collection.



  1. DESCRIBE ANY ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY PROVIDED TO RESPONDENTS


The sharing of the non-public data occurs between transmission operators; the data are not provided to FERC. Recipients of the non-public, operational information are subject to a No-Conduit Rule that prohibits subsequent disclosure of that information to a third party or marketing function employee.


The tariff filings are generally public information. Filers may request special treatment under 18 CFR 388.112.


  1. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL JUSTIFICATION FOR ANY QUESTIONS OF A SENSITIVE NATURE, SUCH AS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDES, RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, AND OTHER MATTERS THAT ARE COMMONLY CONSIDERED PRIVATE


The voluntary sharing of the non-public, operational information occurs between transmission operators; the data are not provided to FERC. The content and frequency of the data being shared is determined by the entities involved based on reliability needs and the operational situation.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


FERC-923, Communication of Operational Information Between

Natural Gas Pipelines and Electric Transmission Operators


Number of Respondents
(1)

Annual Number of Responses per Respondent

(2)

Total Number of Responses (1)*(2)=(3)

Average Burden & Cost Per Response4

(4)

Total Annual Burden Hours & Total Annual Cost

(3)*(4)=(5)

Cost per Respondent

($)

(5)÷(1)

Public Utility Transmission Operator, communications

1645


12

1,968

0.5 hrs.;

$37.25

984 hrs.;

$73,308

$447


Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, communications

155

12

1,860

0.5 hrs.;

$37.25

930 hrs.;

$69,285

$447

TOTAL


3,828


1,914 hrs.;

$142,593



  1. ESTIMATE OF THE TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


There are no non-labor start-up costs. All costs are related to burden hours and are addressed in Questions #12 and #15.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT




Number of Employees (FTE)

Estimated Annual Federal Cost

Analysis and Processing of Filings6

0.15

$23,198

PRA7 Administrative Cost8


$5,481

FERC Total


$28,679


The Commission bases its estimate of the “Analysis and Processing of Filings” cost to the Federal Government on salaries and benefits for professional and clerical support. This estimated cost represents staff analysis, decision-making, and review of any actual filings submitted in response to the information collection.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGES IN BURDEN INCLUDING THE NEED FOR ANY INCREASE


The Commission is making slight modifications to the reporting burden for the FERC-923 information collection. .



Changes due to Agency Discretion:

Burden associated with tariff changes is no longer included in the burden associated with FERC-923 because tariff changes, if needed, were completed during the initial implementation of Order No. 787 information sharing and communications between entities9. (The remaining burden is associated only with ongoing non-public information sharing between respondent entities.)


Changes due to Adjustment in Estimate:

The increase in responses is due to an expected increase in the number of respondents over the next three year clearance period. The increase in respondents is due to normal market fluctuation (e.g., merging or splitting, or entering or exiting the market) . It is not a result of any program change or change in reporting/recordkeeping requirements.


Overall, he aforementioned changes (the removal of burden associated with tariff filings and the small increase in the number of respondents involved in information sharing) result in a slight increase in responses and a slight reduction in total annual burden.


The following table shows the annual total burden of the collection of information. The format, labels, and definitions of the table follow the ROCIS submission system’s “Information Collection Request Summary of Burden” for the metadata.

FERC-923

Total Request

Previously Approved

Change due to Adjustment in Estimate

Change Due to Agency Discretion

Annual Number of Responses

3,828

3,660

180

-12

Annual Time Burden (Hours)

1,914

1,920

90

-96

Annual Cost Burden ($)

$0

$0

$0

$0



  1. TIME SCHEDULE FOR PUBLICATION OF DATA


There are no tabulating, statistical or tabulating analysis or publication plans for the collection of information. The data are used for regulatory purposes only.


  1. DISPLAY OF EXPIRATION DATE


The expiration date is displayed in a table posted on ferc.gov at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/info-collections.asp.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions.

1 The Southwest Cold Weather Event, for one example.

2 81 FR 54574

3 81 FR 73092

4 The estimates for cost per response are derived using the following formula: Average Burden Hours per Response * $74.50 per Hour = Average Cost per Response. The Commission staff believes that the industry’s level and skill set is comparable to FERC’s 2016 figures with an average hourly cost (wages plus benefits) of $74.50.

5 The estimate for the number of respondents is based on the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Compliance Registry as of July 29, 2016, minus the Transmission Operators within ERCOT.

6 Based upon FERC’s 2016 FTE average annual salary plus benefits ($154,647).

7 Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).

8 The PRA Administrative Cost is a Federal Cost associated with preparing, issuing, and submitting materials necessary to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) for rulemakings, orders, or any other vehicle used to create, modify, extend, or discontinue an information collection. This average annual cost includes requests for extensions, all associated rulemakings, and other changes to the collection.

9 RM13-17-000, published on 11/22/2013 (78 FR 70164)

Page 6


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleFERC-923 supporting statement
AuthorNishi Parekh
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-23

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy