60d FRN published

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
exclusive use period for data submitted
in support of a registration under FIFRA
section 3(c)(1)(F)(ii) or a new exclusive
use period for data submitted to support
a registration under FIFRA section
3(c)(1)(F)(vi). These clauses are
intended to provide incentives to
registrants to obtain registrations for
uses that might otherwise go unfulfilled
because they offer low returns because
of low demand.
The information collection activities
associated with the activities described
in this PR Notice are already approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq. The corresponding Information
Collection Request (ICR) document for
the Application for New and Amended
Pesticide Registration has been assigned
EPA ICR number 0277.16 and is
approved OMB control number 2070–
0060.
III. Do PR Notices contain binding
requirements?
The PR Notice about the
determination of a minor use is
intended to provide guidance to EPA
personnel and decision-makers and to
pesticide registrants. While the
requirements in the statutes and Agency
regulations are binding on EPA and the
applicants, this PR Notice is not binding
on either EPA or pesticide registrants,
and EPA may depart from the guidance
where circumstances warrant and
without prior notice. Likewise, pesticide
registrants may assert that the guidance
is not appropriate generally or not
applicable to a specific pesticide or
situation.

[FR Doc. 2016–14037 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
Federal Election Commission.
Thursday, June 16, 2016
at 10:00 a.m.
PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington,
DC (Ninth Floor).
STATUS: This Meeting will be open to
the public.
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
Correction and Approval of Minutes for
May 19, 2016
Draft Advisory Opinion 2016–05:
Huckabee for President, Inc.

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:36 Jun 13, 2016

Jkt 238001

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

[FR Doc. 2016–14077 Filed 6–10–16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60 Day–16–16AQM; Docket No. CDC–2016–
0052]

Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations

The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing efforts to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. This notice invites
comment on the Presidential Youth
Fitness Program (PYFP) Evaluation. The
Evaluation will be conducted in
approximately 11 middle schools
implementing the PYFP and 11 match
comparison schools and will focus on
both process and outcome measures.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 15, 2016.
SUMMARY:

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

DATE AND TIME:

ADDRESSES:

Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.

Dated: May 31, 2016.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

AGENCY:

Proposed Statement of Policy Regarding
the Public Disclosure of Closed
Enforcement Files
Other Rulemaking
REG 2016–02: Draft Interim Final
Rules and Explanation and
Justification: Civil Money Penalty
Inflation Adjustments
Proposed Revisions to Forms 3, 3P,
3X, 6 and Instructions
Management and Administrative
Matters
Individuals who plan to attend and
require special assistance, such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should
contact Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694–1040,
at least 72 hours prior to the meeting
date.
PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:
Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone:
(202) 694–1220.

AGENCY:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

38705

PO 00000

Frm 00050

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2016–
0052 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Mail: Leroy A. Richardson,
Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS–
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. All relevant comments
received will be posted without change
to Regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
Regulations.gov.

Please note: All public comment should be
submitted through the Federal eRulemaking
portal (Regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.

To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact the Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE., MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329; phone: 404–639–7570;
Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques

E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM

14JNN1

38706

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices

or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; to develop,
acquire, install and utilize technology
and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information, to search
data sources, to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Proposed Project
Presidential Youth Fitness Program
Evaluation—New—National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
It is well documented that obesity and
a lack of physical activity (PA) among
children and adolescents are current
public health problems in the United
States. Because school-aged children
spend more than half of their waking
hours in school and engage in 20%–
30% of their total PA at school, schools
are ideal settings for reaching a diverse
cross-section of children with
interventions to increase PA, including
those children experiencing health
disparities. This is particularly
important in middle school, where
research shows lower levels of physical
activity when compared with younger
students.
Evidence shows that multicomponent
school-based physical education (PE)
programs are effective at improving
children’s health and academic
outcomes. Along with these
improvements, school-based PE should
provide fitness assessments,
development of personal fitness plans,
and improved cognitive understanding
about the importance of PA and a
healthy lifestyle. The Presidential Youth
Fitness Program (PYFP) incorporates
each of these factors. To replace
normative-referenced fitness measures
(i.e., the President’s Challenge Youth
Fitness Test), the PYFP has adopted a
criterion-based assessment, using the
FitnessGram® fitness measurement
system, which compares each student’s
measurements to a set of standards for

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:36 Jun 13, 2016

Jkt 238001

fitness and health. Each student can
determine where he or she falls in
relation to the standard and establish a
goal for reaching or exceeding it. The
PYFP also adds fitness education to PE,
provides professional development for
PE teachers, and includes a recognition
system for students who achieve
Healthy Fitness Zone standards.
In 2013, the Presidential Youth
Fitness Program began its first round of
funding to elementary, middle and high
school PE teachers who applied to the
program. A second round of funding
began in 2014 and a third in 2015. Each
participating school receives support to
implement the PYFP for three years.
The resources provided to PE teachers
include: Professional development
training, awards for student recognition
of fitness achievements, access to a
professional learning community and
access to FitnessGram® fitness
assessment software. For the schools
selected to receive PYFP support, the
requirements include: (1) Information
Technology (IT) manager and PE teacher
participation in the FitnessGram®
software training, (2) PE teacher
participation in PYFP professional
development training, (3) conducting
FitnessGram® assessments according to
the training, (4) recognizing student
achievement in fitness and physical
activity, (5) confirming continued
participation in the program at the end
of Years 1 and 2, and (6) participating
in evaluation activities. The PYFP is
designed to supplement the traditional
PE course and support physical
education (PE) teachers in laying the
foundation for students to lead an active
life.
CDC plans to conduct the first
rigorous evaluation of the PYFP. The
evaluation will assess the impact of the
program on student, PE teacher and
school level outcomes (outcome
evaluation) as well as barriers and
facilitators to program implementation
(process evaluation). Evaluation
activities will take place in 11 schools
implementing the PYFP and 11 match
comparison schools, contributing a total
of 82 sixth grade PE classes. Information
collection will be conducted in 6 PYFP
and 6 match comparison schools in
Spring 2017 and 5 PYFP and 5 match
comparison schools in Fall 2017. The
PYFP schools recruited to participate in
the PYFP Evaluation will be identified
from a list of schools receiving Round
2 or Round 3 PYFP funding and meeting
the following inclusion criteria: (1)
Middle school with a sixth grade, (2)
sixth grade enrollment of 150 or higher,
(3) 50% or more of students receiving
free or reduced lunch, and (4)
documented completion of PYFP

PO 00000

Frm 00051

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

professional development training.
Comparison schools will be matched
based on criteria 1–3 above as well as
location to ensure similar PE policies
and standards. The process and
outcome evaluation will involve data
collection activities with four
respondent groups: (1) Students, (2) PE
teachers, (3) parents, and (4) school
administrators.
The specific aims of the outcome
evaluation are to examine how the PYFP
impacts student fitness and physical
activity, particularly how the program
impacts student: (1) Fitness knowledge
and health knowledge, (2) attitudes
toward physical activity, (3) motivation
to be physically active, (4) physical
activity levels, and (5) fitness. Surveys
to be conducted at all schools include
the: (1) Paper-based PYFP Student
Survey, (2) online PYFP PE Teacher
Survey, and (3) online PYFP School
Administrator Survey. There are minor
differences in the survey instruments
depending on whether the school is a
PYFP participant or a non-PYFP school.
The outcome evaluation will also
determine the changes made as a result
of the PYFP such as changes at the
school level (e.g., improved PE and
physical activity policies and practices,
increased parent awareness of school PE
and physical activity) and changes in PE
teaching practices (e.g., integration of
fitness education, increased use of
fitness assessment tools and improved
practices for fitness testing).
The outcome evaluation will include
fitness assessments with approximately
2,460 students as part of the standard PE
program (1,230 PYFP sixth grade
students and 1,230 non-PYFP sixth
grade students). Fitness assessments
will be conducted at both the beginning
and end of the semester using
FitnessGram®’s pacer and body
composition assessments. Finally, a
subset of 6 PYFP and 6 match
comparison schools will assess
students’ physical activity levels by
collecting student accelerometry data.
Accelerometry will be conducted in a
subset of 25 PYFP and 25 non-PYFP
classes to capture data from
approximately 500 students (250
students from PYFP schools and 250
students from match comparison
schools). Accelerometry data collection
will involve wearing the device for a
week at the beginning and a week at the
end of semester and noting hours of
wear time and class schedule.
Information collection for the process
evaluation will be conducted only in the
11 PYFP schools. The aims of the
process evaluation are to describe how
PYFP resources were used by teachers
and schools, the strategies used by

E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM

14JNN1

38707

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
teachers and schools to integrate fitness
education and student recognition of
fitness achievement into the schools,
and barriers and facilitators relevant to
PYFP implementation. All PYFP
schools will complete cost and time use
worksheets. In addition, focus groups
with PE teachers, students, and parents

PYFP compared with a traditional PE
curriculum and gather information
critical for program improvement.
OMB approval is requested for two
years. Participation in the PYFP
Evaluation is voluntary and there are no
costs to respondents other than their
time.

will be conducted in a subset of 6 PYFP
schools. Focus groups will take place on
school grounds during or outside of the
school day, depending on availability of
a given respondent group.
The information collected for the
PYFP evaluation will allow the CDC and
partners to assess the impact of the

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents

6th grade students in
PYFP Schools.
PE teachers in PYFP
Schools.
School administrators in
PYFP Schools.
Parents of 6th graders
enrolled in PE at
PYFP Schools.
6th grade students in
non-PYFP Schools.
PE teachers in nonPYFP Schools.
School Administrators in
non-PYFP Schools.
Total ........................

Total
burden
(in hrs)

615
125
615
30
22
12
6
6
6
30

2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

15/60
30/60
15/60
1
25/60
1
30/60
20/60
1
1

308
125
154
30
9
12
3
2
6
30

FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ...................
Accelerometry Log ...............................................
Student Survey (non-PYFP Schools) ..................
PE Teacher Survey (non-PYFP Schools) ...........

615
125
615
22

2
2
1
1

15/60
30/60
15/60
20/60

308
125
154
8

(non-PYFP

6

1

20/60

2

..............................................................................

........................

........................

........................

1,276

School
Administrator
Schools).

[FR Doc. 2016–14016 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention

Jkt 238001

regulations. This authority must also be
exercised in accordance with the
Department’s established policies,
procedures, guidelines and regulations
and with all other pertinent issuances.
This delegation became effective upon
date of signature. In addition, I have
affirmed and ratified any actions taken
by the Director, CDC, or other CDC
officials which involve the exercise of
the authorities delegated herein prior to
the effective date of this delegation.

[FR Doc. 2016–13995 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]

Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to section 222 of the Public Health
Service Act [42 U.S.C. 217a], as
amended, I have delegated to the
Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), authority to
appoint temporary members to the
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health’s Safety and
Occupational Health Study Section
(SOHSS).
These authorities shall be exercised
under the Department’s existing
delegation of authority and policy on

19:36 Jun 13, 2016

Survey

Dated: June 7, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.

Advisory Councils or Committees;
Delegation of Authority

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Average
burden per
response
(in hrs)

FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ...................
Accelerometry Log ...............................................
Student Survey (PYFP Schools) .........................
Student Focus Group Moderator Guide ..............
PE Teacher Survey (PYFP Schools) ..................
PE Teacher Focus Group Moderator Guide .......
PYFP Time Use Worksheet ................................
School Administrator Survey (PYFP Schools) ....
PYFP Cost Worksheet ........................................
Parent Focus Group Moderator Guide ................

Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

Numner of
responses per
respondent

Number of
respondents

Form name

BILLING CODE 4160–18–P

PO 00000

Frm 00052

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–16–16AOW; Docket No. CDC–2016–
0050]

Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:

The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. This notice invites
comment on the CDC I-Catalyst
program. The I-Catalyst program is
intended to help CDC employees get
their ideas out of the starting blocks and
down the track through a discovery,

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM

14JNN1