Attachment 40 Summary of the Literature Informing Power Analyses
Table 1. Summary of Current Research Informing PYFP Evaluation Power Analyses
| Author | Outcomes | Population | Design | ICC | Notes | 
| Robbins et al., 2013 | Middle school girls | Cluster Randomized Trial (CRT); two levels (school, student), with randomization at level 2 (school) | .02 assumed; no ICC reported | — | |
| Vizcaino et al., 2008 | BMI | School children; average age, 9 | CRT; 2 levels (school, kid), with randomization at level 2 (school) | .009 assumed; no ICC reported | — | 
| Lubans et al., 2010 | BMI | Eighth-grade girls | CRT; 2 levels(school, kid), with randomization at level 2 (school) | .01 assumed; reported ICC = .03 | Also reported ICC obtained for MVPA (.09) | 
| Laris, Russell, & Potter, 2007 | Skills, minutes of PA, strength, and VO2 max | Fourth- and fifth-grade students | Quasi-experiment; 2 levels, with pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest | .006 assumed for minutes of PA and .011 assumed for VO2 max; no ICCs reported | — | 
| Kriemler et al., 2010 | Body fat, aerobic fitness, and PA | First- and fifth-grade students | CRT; three levels (school, class, student), with randomization at level 2 (class) | .10 assumed; .06 for reported body fat, .03 for aerobic fitness, .15 for PA, and .08 for MVPA | These ICCs are for class level. The researchers assessed school level and found it to be negligible. | 
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 
| Author | Frost, Stephanie | 
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 | 
| File Created | 2021-01-23 |