Attachment 40 Summary of the Literature Informing Power Analyses
Table 1. Summary of Current Research Informing PYFP Evaluation Power Analyses
Author |
Outcomes |
Population |
Design |
ICC |
Notes |
Robbins et al., 2013 |
Middle school girls |
Cluster Randomized Trial (CRT); two levels (school, student), with randomization at level 2 (school) |
.02 assumed; no ICC reported |
— |
|
Vizcaino et al., 2008 |
BMI |
School children; average age, 9 |
CRT; 2 levels (school, kid), with randomization at level 2 (school) |
.009 assumed; no ICC reported |
— |
Lubans et al., 2010 |
BMI |
Eighth-grade girls |
CRT; 2 levels(school, kid), with randomization at level 2 (school) |
.01 assumed; reported ICC = .03 |
Also reported ICC obtained for MVPA (.09) |
Laris, Russell, & Potter, 2007 |
Skills, minutes of PA, strength, and VO2 max |
Fourth- and fifth-grade students |
Quasi-experiment; 2 levels, with pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest |
.006 assumed for minutes of PA and .011 assumed for VO2 max; no ICCs reported |
— |
Kriemler et al., 2010 |
Body fat, aerobic fitness, and PA |
First- and fifth-grade students |
CRT; three levels (school, class, student), with randomization at level 2 (class) |
.10 assumed; .06 for reported body fat, .03 for aerobic fitness, .15 for PA, and .08 for MVPA |
These ICCs are for class level. The researchers assessed school level and found it to be negligible. |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Frost, Stephanie |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-23 |