Part 874 60-day FR Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Notices
Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–1
Sally R. Butts,
Acting Deputy State Director, Lands and
Resources.
[FR Doc. 2016–20942 Filed 8–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
[S1D1S SS08011000 SX066A0067F
167S180110; S2D2D SS08011000 SX066A00
33F 16XS501520]

Notice of Proposed Information
Collection; Request for Comments for
1029–0113
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSMRE) is
announcing its intention to request
approval for the collection of
information for General Reclamation
Requirements.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
information collection must be received
by October 31, 2016, to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Mail comments to John
Trelease, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951
Constitution Ave. NW., Room 203—SIB,
Washington, DC 20240. Comments may
also be submitted electronically to
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
receive a copy of the information
collection request contact John Trelease
at (202) 208–2783, or via email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities
[see 5 CFR 1320.8 (d)]. This notice
identifies the information collection that
OSMRE will be submitting to OMB for
extension. This collection is contained
in 30 CFR part 874.
OSM has revised burden estimates,
where appropriate, to reflect current
reporting levels or adjustments based on
reestimates of burden or number of
respondents. OSMRE will request a

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

21:59 Aug 30, 2016

Jkt 238001

3-year term of approval for this
information collection activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) the need
for the collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the
agency; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information collections; and (4) ways to
minimize the information collection
burden on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collection of the
information. A summary of the public
comments will accompany OSMRE’s
submission of the information collection
request to OMB.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment–including your
personal identifying information–may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
This notice provides the public with
60 days in which to comment on the
following information collection
activity:
Title: 30 CFR part 874—General
Reclamation Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0113.
Summary: Part 874 establishes land
and water eligibility requirements,
reclamation objectives and priorities
and reclamation contractor
responsibility. 30 CFR 874.17 requires
consultation between the AML agency
and the appropriate Title V regulatory
authority on the likelihood of removing
the coal under a Title V permit and
concurrences between the AML agency
and the appropriate Title V regulatory
authority on the AML project boundary
and the amount of coal that would be
extracted under the AML reclamation
project.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents: 17 State
regulatory authorities and Indian tribes.
Total Annual Responses: 17.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,411.
Dated: August 25, 2016.
John A. Trelease,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2016–20937 Filed 8–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P

PO 00000

Frm 00046

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

60021

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–794]

Certain Electronic Devices, Including
Wireless Communication Devices,
Portable Music and Data Processing
Devices, and Tablet Computers
Sanction for Breaches of
Administrative Protective Order
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Sanction for breaches of
Commission administrative protective
order.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has imposed a sanction for
the breach of the administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) issued in this
investigation. The Commission
determined that the law firm of Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
(‘‘Quinn Emanuel’’) breached the APO
by failing to adequately control access to
confidential business information
(‘‘CBI’’) in the investigation and
litigation in the U.S. District for the
Northern District of California. As a
result, Quinn Emanuel attorneys and
employees of complainants Samsung
Telecommunications America LLC and
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
(collectively, ‘‘Samsung’’) improperly
disclosed CBI to more than 140
unauthorized persons over a fourteenmonth period. Quinn Emanuel is being
publicly reprimanded for pervasive
problems at the firm in safeguarding
CBI.

SUMMARY:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carol McCue Verratti, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3088. Hearing impaired individuals
are advised that information on this
matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal at (202)
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission can also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Several
Quinn Emanuel attorneys inadvertently
disclosed CBI designated by respondent
Apple Inc. as CBI in the investigation
and for cross-use in litigation in the U.S.
District for the Northern District of
California to persons who were not
authorized to access CBI under the APO.
A junior associate at Quinn Emanuel
failed to fully redact CBI from an expert
report prepared for the district court
action, and a partner at Quinn Emanuel
failed to supervise the junior associate.

E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM

31AUN1