Supporting Statement

Supporting Statement.doc

REG-106542-98 (TD 9032) (Final), Election to Treat Trust as Part of an Estate

OMB: 1545-1578

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf



SUPPORTING STATEMENT

OMB No. 1545-1578

TD 9032, Election To Treat Trust As Part Of An Estate


1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Section 1305 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-34, 111 Stat. 788 (1997) added §646 to the Internal Revenue Code to permit an election to treat and tax certain revocable trusts as part of an estate. Section 646 was redesignated section 645 by section 6013(a) of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Public Law 105-206, 112 Stat. 685 (1998). Rev. Proc. 98-13, 1998-1 C.B. 370, replaced by TD 9032, 2003-1 C.B. 471. The final regulations provides the procedures and requirements for making the §645 election.


2. USE OF DATA


Section 1.645-1 of the regulation requires that taxpayers must submit the information in order to make the §645 election. The information will be used by the I.R.S for tax administration purposes.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.




4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


This collection of information will not have a significant

impact on a substantial number of small businesses or other entities.







6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Taxpayers may submit incorrect information and not make the §645 election.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).



  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


REG-106542-98 (Final) was published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2000 (65 FR 79015). A public hearing was scheduled for April 11, 2001, but was cancelled when no one requested to speak. The final regulations were published in the Federal Register (67FR 78371).


In response to the Federal Register notice (81 FR 66133), dated September 26, 2016, we received no comments during the comment period.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No personally identifiable information (PII) is collected.










12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.645-1 of the proposed regulation requires a statement to be completed and attached to the Form 1041, U.S. Income Tax Return for Estates and Trusts, filed for the estate for its first taxable year.


The burden estimate is as follows:

TD

Responses (Trusts)

Time/per/responses

Total Burden Hours

TD 9032

10,000

.30 minutes

5,000




13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


There are no capital/start-up or ongoing operation/ maintenance cost associated with this information collection.



  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There is no estimated annualized cost to the federal government.



  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.









  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration data is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulations sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.





  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

File Typeapplication/msword
Last Modified ByDepartment of Treasury
File Modified2016-12-05
File Created2007-04-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy