60-Day FR Notice

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Notices
8410–01–279–7736—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
10S
8410–01–279–7737—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
10R
8410–01–279–7738—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
10L
8410–01–279–7739—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
12S
8410–01–279–7740—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
12R
8410–01–279–7741—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
12L
8410–01–279–7742—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
14S
8410–01–279–7743—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
14R
8410–01–279–7744—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
14L
8410–01–279–7745—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
16S
8410–01–279–7746—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
16R
8410–01–279–7747—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
16L
8410–01–279–7748—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
18S
8410–01–279–7749—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
18R
8410–01–279–7750—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
18L
8410–01–279–7751—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
20S
8410–01–279–7752—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
20R
8410–01–279–7753—Skirt, Gabardine,
Lined, Marine Corps, Women’s, Blue,
20L
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics
Agency Troop Support
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7520–01–385–7362—Pencil, Mechanical,
Side Action, Green Barrel, 0.7 mm
7520–01–354–2305—Pencil, Mechanical,
Push Action, Red Barrel and Lead, Extra
Bold Point (1.1 mm)
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: San Antonio
Lighthouse for the Blind, San Antonio,
TX
Contracting Activity: General Services
Administration, New York, NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7510–01–443–2121—Toner, Cartridges,
New
7510–00–NIB–0633—Skilcraft Toner
Cartridge
7510–00–NIB–0642—Skilcraft Toner
Cartridge
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Alabama
Industries for the Blind, Talladega, AL

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:08 Aug 18, 2016

Jkt 238001

Contracting Activity: General Services
Administration, New York, NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7045–01–599–5322—Glare Shield for
iPhone
7045–01–599–5271—Glare Shield for
Blackberry Bold
7045–01–599–5273—Glare Shield for
Blackberry Storm2
7045–01–599–5290—Glare Shield for
Blackberry Curve2
7045–01–599–5275—Universal PDA Glare
Shield
7045–01–599–5287—Privacy Shield for
iPhone
7045–01–599–5276—Privacy Shield for
Blackberry Bold
7045–01–599–5278—Privacy Shield for
Blackberry Storm2
7045–01–599–5285—Privacy Shield for
Blackberry Curve2
7045–01–599–5282—Privacy Shield for
PDA, Universal
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Wiscraft,
Inc., Milwaukee, WI
Contracting Activity: General Services
Administration, New York, NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7110–00–194–1611—Rotary Drafting
Stool—Faux Leather
7110–00–281–4469—Rotary Drafting
Stool—Upholstered
Contracting Activity: General Services
Administration, Philadelphia, PA
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7210–00–NIB–0160—Pillow, Medical,
White, 26″ x 20″
7210–00–NIB–0161—Pillow, Medical,
Blue, 26″ x 20″
7210–00–NIB–0162—Pillow, Bed, Flame
Resistant, Pink, 26″ x 20″
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Blind
Industries & Services of Maryland,
Baltimore, MD
Contracting Activity: Department of Veterans
Affairs
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
5970–01–245–7042—Tape, Electrical
Insulation, Black, 1″ W x 108 ft
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Cincinnati
Association for the Blind, Cincinnati, OH
Blind Industries & Services of Maryland,
Baltimore, MD
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
5970–01–560–5355—Tape, Insulation,
Electrical, High Voltage, Black, 2″ x 108′
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Blind
Industries & Services of Maryland,
Baltimore, MD
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics
Agency Aviation
Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2016–19842 Filed 8–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

55449

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0041]

Collection of Information; Proposed
Extension of Approval; Comment
Request—Publicly Available Consumer
Product Safety Information Database
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (CPSC or
Commission) requests comments on a
proposed extension of approval of a
collection of information for the
Publicly Available Consumer Product
Safety Information Database. The
Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting an extension of
approval of this collection of
information from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by October 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2010–
0041, by any of the following methods:
You may submit comments, identified
by Docket No. CPSC–2010–0041, by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The Commission does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail
(email), except through
www.regulations.gov. The Commission
encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other
personal information provided, to:
http://www.regulations.gov. Do not
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM

19AUN1

55450

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Notices

the public. If furnished at all, such
information should be submitted in
writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: http://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number CPSC–2010–0041, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact: Robert H.
Squibb, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7815, or
by email to: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Section 212 of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA) added section 6A to the
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA),
which requires the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (CPSC or
Commission) to establish and maintain
a publicly available, searchable database
on the safety of consumer products and
other products or substances regulated
by the Commission (Database). Among
other things, section 6A of the CPSA
requires the Commission to collect
reports of harm from the public for
potential publication in the publicly
available Database, and to collect and
publish comments about reports of harm
from manufacturers.
The Commission announced that a
proposed collection of information in
conjunction with the Database, called
the Publicly Available Consumer
Product Safety Information Database,
had been submitted to OMB for review
and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520 in a proposed rule published on
May 24, 2010 (75 FR 29156). The
Commission issued a final rule on the
Database on December 9, 2010 (75 FR
76832). The final rule interprets various
statutory requirements in section 6A of
the CPSA pertaining to the information
to be included in the Database and also
establishes provisions regarding
submitting reports of harm; providing
notice of reports of harm to
manufacturers; publishing reports of
harm and manufacturer comments in
the Database; and dealing with

confidential and materially inaccurate
information.
OMB approved the collection of
information for the Database under
control number 3041–0146. OMB’s most
recent extension of approval on
December 2, 2013 will expire on
December 31, 2016. Accordingly, the
Commission now proposes to request an
extension of approval of this collection
of information.
B. Information Collected Through the
Database
The primary purpose of this
information collection is to populate the
publicly searchable Database of
consumer product safety information
mandated by section 6A of the CPSA.
The Database information collection has
four components: Reports of harm,
manufacturer comments, branding
information, and the Small Batch
Manufacturer Registry (SBMR).
Reports of Harm: Reports of harm
communicate information regarding an
injury, illness, or death, or any risk (as
determined by CPSC) of injury, illness,
or death, relating to the use of a
consumer product. Reports can be
submitted to the CPSC by consumers;
local, state, or federal government
agencies; health care professionals;
child service providers; public safety
entities; and others. Reports may be
submitted in one of three ways: Via the
CPSC Web site
(www.SaferProducts.gov), by telephone
via a CPSC call center, or by email, fax,
or mail using the incident report form
(available for download or printing via
the CPSC Web site). Reports may also
originate as a free-form letter or email.
Submitters must consent to inclusion of
their report of harm in the publicly
searchable Database.
Manufacturer Comments: A
manufacturer or private labeler may
submit a comment related to a report of
harm after the CPSC transmits the report
to the manufacturer or private labeler
identified in the report. Manufacturer
comments may be submitted through
the business portal, by email, mail, or
fax. The business portal is a feature of
the Database that allows manufacturers
who register on the business portal to
receive reports of harm and comment on

such reports through the business
portal. Use of the business portal
expedites the receipt of reports of harm
and business response times.
A manufacturer may request that the
Commission designate information in a
report of harm as confidential. Such a
request may be made using the business
portal, by email, by mail, or by fax.
Additionally, any person or entity
reviewing a report of harm or
manufacturer comment, either before or
after publication in the Database, may
request that the report or comment, or
portions of the report or comment, be
excluded from the Database because it
contains materially inaccurate
information. Such a request may be
made by manufacturers using the
business portal, by email, mail or fax,
and may be submitted by anyone else by
email, mail, or fax.
Branding Information: Using the
business portal, registered businesses
may voluntarily submit branding
information to assist CPSC in correctly
and timely routing reports of harm
involving their products to them. Brand
names may be licensed to another entity
for use in labeling consumer products
manufactured by that entity. CPSC’s
understanding of licensing
arrangements for consumer products
ensures that the correct manufacturer is
timely notified regarding a report of
harm.
Small Batch Manufacturers Registry:
The business portal also contains the
SBMR, which is the online mechanism
by which ‘‘small batch manufacturers’’
(as defined in the CPSA) can identify
themselves to obtain relief from certain
third party testing requirements for
children’s products. To register as a
small batch manufacturer, a business
must attest that the company’s income
level and the number of units of the
covered product manufactured for
which relief is sought both fall within
the statutory limits to receive relief from
third party testing.
C. Estimated Burden
1. Estimated Annual Burden for
Respondents
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN FOR REPORTS OF HARM
Number of
respondents

Collection type
Reports of Harm—submitted through website ....................
Reports of Harm—submitted by phone ...............................
Reports of Harm—submitted by mail, email, fax .................

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:08 Aug 18, 2016

Jkt 238001

PO 00000

Frm 00023

Response
frequency 1

6,582
2,632
780

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Total annual
responses

1.03
1.01
6.67

E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM

6,790
2,643
5,206

19AUN1

Minutes per
response
12
10
20

Total burden,
in hours 2
1,358
441
1,735

55451

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN FOR REPORTS OF HARM—Continued
Number of
respondents

Collection type
Total ..............................................................................

Response
frequency 1

9,994

........................

Total annual
responses

Minutes per
response

14,639

........................

Total burden,
in hours 2
3,534

1 Frequency

of responses is calculated by dividing the number of responses by the number of respondents.
2 Numbers have been rounded.

TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN FOR MANUFACTURER SUBMISSIONS
Number of
respondents

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Collection type
Manufacturer Comments—submitted through Web site .....
Manufacturer Comments—submitted by mail, email, fax ....
Requests to Treat Information as Confidential—submitted
through Web site ..............................................................
Requests to Treat Information as Confidential—submitted
by mail, email, fax ............................................................
Requests to Treat Information as Materially Inaccurate—
submitted through Web site .............................................
Requests to Treat Information as Materially Inaccurate—
submitted by mail, email, fax ...........................................
Voluntary Brand Identification ..............................................
Small Batch Manufacturer Identification ..............................
Total ..............................................................................

Response
frequency 1

Total annual
responses

Minutes per
response

Total burden,
in hours 2

532
283

6.23
1.22

3,317
346

117
147

6,468
848

12

1.08

13

42

9

0

n/a

0

72

0

131

1.82

238

165

655

79
829
2,208

1.06
1.48
1

84
1,228
2,208

195
10
10

273
205
368

4,074

........................

7,434

........................

8,826

Based on the data set forth in Tables
1 and 2 above, the annual reporting cost
is estimated to be $719,381. This
estimate is based on the sum of two
estimated total figures for reports of
harm and manufacturer submissions.
The estimated number of respondents
and responses are based on the actual
responses received in FY 2015. We
assume that the number of responses
and respondents will be similar in
future years.
Reports of Harm: Table 1 sets forth
the data used to estimate the burden
associated with submitting reports of
harm. We had previously estimated the
time associated with the electronic and
telephone submission of reports of harm
at 12 and 10 minutes, respectively, and
because we have had no indication that
these estimates are not appropriate or
accurate, we used those figures for
present purposes as well. We estimate
that the time associated with a paper or
PDF form would be 20 minutes, on
average.
To estimate the costs for submitting
reports of harm, we multiplied the
estimated total burden hours associated
with reports of harm (1,358 hours + 441

hours + 1,735 hours = 3,534 hours) by
an estimated total compensation for all
workers in private industry of $32.06
per hour,3 which results in an estimated
cost of $113,300 (3,534 hours × $32.06
per hour = $113,300).
Manufacturer Submissions: Table 2
sets forth the data used to estimate the
burden associated with manufacturers’
submissions to the Database. We
observed that a large percentage of the
general comments come from a few
businesses and assumed that the
experience of a business that submits
many comments each year would be
different from one that submits only a
few. Accordingly, we divided all
responding businesses into three
groups, based on the number of general
comments submitted in FY 2015; and
then we selected several businesses
from each group to contact. The first
group we contacted consisted of
businesses that submitted 50 or more
comments in FY 2015, accounting for 31
percent of all general comments
received. The second group we
contacted included businesses that
submitted six to 49 comments,
accounting for 39 percent of all general

comments received. The last group
contacted included businesses that
submitted no more than five comments,
accounting for 30 percent of all general
comments received.4 We asked each
company contacted how long it
typically takes to research, compose,
and enter a comment, a claim of
materially inaccurate information, or a
confidential information claim.
To estimate the burden associated
with submitting a general comment
through the business portal regarding a
report of harm, we averaged the burden
provided by each company within each
group and then calculated a weighted
average from the three groups,
weighting each group by the proportion
of comments received from that group.
We found that the average time to
submit a general comment regarding a
report of harm is 117 minutes based on
the data in Table 3 (((15 minutes + 45
minutes + 30 minutes + 15 minutes)/4
companies) * .31 + ((105 minutes + 45
minutes + 150 minutes + 15 minutes)/
4 companies) * .39 + ((240 minutes + 60
minutes + 480 minutes)/3 companies) *
.30 = 117 minutes).

1 Frequency of response is calculated by dividing
the number of responses by the number of
respondents.
2 Numbers have been rounded.

3 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Table 9 of the Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private Industry,
goods-producing and service-providing industries,
by occupational group, June 2016 (data extracted on

06/23/2016 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/
ecec.t09.htm.
4 In the last group one company was excluded as
an outlier.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:08 Aug 18, 2016

Jkt 238001

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM

19AUN1

55452

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED BURDEN TO ENTER A GENERAL COMMENT IN THE DATABASE
Group

Company

Group 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................
(>=50 comments) .............................................................................................................................................

A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C

Group 2 ....................................................................................................................................................................
(6–49 comments) ..............................................................................................................................................

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Group 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................
(>=5 comments) ...............................................................................................................................................

Registered businesses generally
submit comments through our Web site.
Unregistered businesses submit
comments by mail, email, or fax. We
estimate that for unregistered
businesses, submitting comments takes
a little longer because we often must ask
the businesses to amend their
submissions to include the required
certifications. Thus, we estimated that
on average, comments submitted by
mail, email, or fax take 30 minutes
longer than those submitted through our
Web site (117 minutes + 30 minutes =
147 minutes).
The submission of a claim of
materially inaccurate information is a
relatively rare event for all respondents.
Accordingly, we averaged all responses
together. Eight of the businesses
contacted had submitted claims of
materially inaccurate information. We
found that the average time to submit a
claim that a report of harm contains a
material inaccuracy is 165 minutes ((30
minutes + 90 minutes + 45 minutes + 90
minutes + 60 minutes + 660 minutes +
45 minutes + 300 minutes)/8 companies
= 165 minutes).
Registered businesses generally
submit claims through the business
portal. Unregistered businesses submit
claims by mail, email, or fax. We
estimate that submitting claims by mail,
email, or fax takes a little longer because
we often must ask the businesses to
amend their submission to include the
required certifications. Thus, we
estimated that on average, claims
submitted by mail, email, or fax take 30
minutes longer than those submitted
through our Web site (165 minutes + 30
minutes = 195 minutes).
The submission of a claim of
confidential information is a relatively
rare event for all respondents;
accordingly, we averaged all responses
together. Five of the businesses
contacted had submitted claims of
confidential information. We found that
the average time to submit a claim that

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:08 Aug 18, 2016

Jkt 238001

a report of harm contains confidential
information is 42 minutes ((45 minutes
+ 15 minutes + 60 minutes + 30 minutes
+ 60 minutes)/5 companies = 42
minutes).
Registered businesses generally
submit confidential information claims
through the business portal.
Unregistered businesses submit
confidential information claims by mail,
email, or fax. We estimate that
submitting claims in this way takes a
little longer because we often must ask
the businesses to amend their
submission to include the required
certifications. Thus, we estimate that a
confidential information claim
submitted by mail, email, or fax would
take 30 minutes longer than those
submitted through our Web site (42
minutes + 30 minutes = 72 minutes).
For voluntary brand identification, we
estimate that a response would take 10
minutes on average. Most responses
consist only of the brand name and a
product description. In many cases a
business will submit multiple entries in
a brief period of time and we can see
from the date and time stamps on these
records that an entry often takes less
than two minutes. CPSC staff enters the
same data in a similar form based on our
own research, and that experience was
also factored into our estimate.
For small batch manufacturer
identification, we estimate that a
response would take 10 minutes on
average. The form consists of three
check boxes and the information should
be readily accessible to the respondent.
The responses summarized in Table 2
are generally submitted by
manufacturers. To avoid
underestimating the cost associated
with the collection of this data, we
assigned the higher hourly wage
associated with a manager or
professional in goods-producing
industries to these tasks. To estimate the
cost of manufacturer submissions we
multiplied the estimated total burden

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

General
comments
(minutes)
15
45
30
15
105
45
150
15
240
60
480

hours in Table 2 (8,826 hours) by an
estimated total compensation for a
manager or professional in goodsproducing industries of $68.67 per
hour,5 which results in an estimated
cost of $606,081 (8,826 hours × $68.67
per hour = $606,081).
Therefore, the total estimated annual
cost to respondents is $719,381
($113,300 burden for reports of harm +
$606,081 burden for manufacturer
submissions = $719,381).
2. Estimated Annual Burden on
Government
We estimate the annualized cost to
the CPSC to be $954,531. This figure is
based on the costs for four categories of
work for the Database: Reports of Harm,
Materially Inaccurate Information
Claims, Manufacturer Comments, and
Small Batch Identification. Each
category is described below. No
government cost is associated with
Voluntary Brand Identification because
this information is entered directly into
the Database by the manufacturer with
no processing required by the
government. The information assists the
government in directing reports of harm
to the correct manufacturer. We did not
attempt to calculate separately the
government cost for claims of
confidential information because the
number of claims is so small. The time
to process these claims is included with
claims of materially inaccurate
information.
Reports of Harm: The Reports of Harm
category includes many different tasks.
Some costs related to this category are
from two data entry contracts. Tasks
related to these contracts include
clerical coding of the report, such as
5 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Table 9 of the Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private Industry,
goods-producing and service-providing industries,
by occupational group, June 2016 (data extracted on
06/23/2016 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/
ecec.t09.htm.

E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM

19AUN1

55453

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Notices
identifying the type of consumer
product reported and the appropriate
associated hazard, as well as performing
quality control on the data in the report.
Contractor A spends an estimated 5,267
hours per year performing these tasks.
With an hourly rate of $33.31 for
contractor services, the annual cost to
the government of contract A is
$175,444. Contractor B spends an
estimated 2,539 hours per year
performing these tasks. With an hourly

rate of $58.09 for contractor services, the
annual cost to the government of
contract B is $147,491.
The Reports of Harm category also
includes sending consent requests for
reports when necessary, processing that
consent when received, determining
whether a product is out of CPSC’s
jurisdiction, and confirming that
pictures and attachments do not have
any personally identifiable information.
The Reports category also entails

notifying manufacturers when one of
their products is reported, completing a
risk of harm determination form for
every report eligible for publication,
referring some reports to a Subject
Matter Expert (SME) within the CPSC
for a determination on whether the
reports meet the requirement of having
a risk of harm, and determining whether
a report meets all the statutory and
regulatory requirements for publication.
Detailed costs are:

TABLE 4—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REPORTS OF HARM TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)

Grade level

Total
compensation
per hour

Total annual
cost

Contract A ....................................................................................................................................
Contract B ....................................................................................................................................
7 ...................................................................................................................................................
9 ...................................................................................................................................................
12 .................................................................................................................................................
13 .................................................................................................................................................
14 .................................................................................................................................................

5,267
2,539
200
300
5,528
428
1,068

$33.31
58.09
34.78
42.69
61.91
73.37
86.99

$175,444
147,491
6,956
12,807
342,238
31,402
92,905

Total ......................................................................................................................................

15,330

........................

809,243

Materially Inaccurate Information
(MII) Claims: The MII claims category
includes reviewing and responding to

claims, participating in meetings where
the claims are discussed, and
completing a risk of harm determination

on reports when a company alleges that
a report does not describe a risk of
harm.

TABLE 5—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MII CLAIMS TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)

Grade level

Total
compensation
per hour

Total annual
cost

12 .................................................................................................................................................
13 .................................................................................................................................................
14 .................................................................................................................................................
15 .................................................................................................................................................
SES ..............................................................................................................................................

275
167
323
50
50

$61.91
73.37
86.99
101.99
109.97

$17,025
12,253
28,098
5,100
5,499

Total ......................................................................................................................................

865

........................

67,975.00

Manufacturer Comments: The
Comments category includes reviewing
and accepting or rejecting comments.

TABLE 6—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MANUFACTURER COMMENTS TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Grade level

Total
compensation
per hour

Total annual
cost

12 .................................................................................................................................................
13 .................................................................................................................................................

62
109

$61.91
73.37

$3,838
7,997

Total ......................................................................................................................................

171

........................

11,835

Small Batch Manufacturer
Identification: The Small Batch
Manufacturer Identification category

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:08 Aug 18, 2016

Jkt 238001

includes time spent posting the list of
small batch registrations, as well as
answering manufacturers’ questions on

PO 00000

Frm 00026

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

registering as a Small Batch company
and what the implications to that
company of small batch registration.

E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM

19AUN1

55454

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 7—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR SMALL BATCH TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)

Grade level

Total annual
cost

15 .................................................................................................................................................

642

$101.99

$65,478

Total ......................................................................................................................................

642

........................

$65,478

We estimate the annualized cost to
the CPSC of $954,531 by adding the four
categories of work related to the
Database summarized in Tables 4
through 7 (Reports of Harm ($809,243)
+ MII Claims ($67,975) + Manufacturer
Comments ($11,835) + Small Batch
Identification ($65,478) = $954,531).
This information collection renewal
request based on an estimated 12,360
burden hours per year for the Database
is a decrease of 7,485 hours since this
collection of information was last
approved by OMB in 2013. The decrease
in burden is due primarily to the fact
that the number of incoming reports of
harm has decreased, and the number of
claims based on those reports has
decreased as well. While comments did
not decline significantly, they did shift
to the more efficient online
submissions. We note a large increase in
small batch manufacturer activity,
which has been rising steadily for years.
However, this increase was not large
enough to offset the decreases in other
areas.
D. Request for Comments

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Total
compensation
per hour

The Commission solicits written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed collection of
information. The Commission
specifically solicits information relevant
to the following topics:
• Whether the collection of
information described above is
necessary for the proper performance of
the Commission’s functions, including
whether the information would have
practical utility;
• Whether the estimated burden of
the proposed collection of information
is accurate;
• Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected
could be enhanced; and
• Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of
information technology.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:08 Aug 18, 2016

Jkt 238001

Dated: February 16, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–19811 Filed 8–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Board of Visitors of the U.S. Air Force
Academy; Notice of Meeting
U.S. Air Force Academy Board
of Visitors, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Meeting notice.
AGENCY:

In accordance with 10 U.S.C.
Section 9355, the U.S. Air Force
Academy (USAFA) Board of Visitors
(BoV) will hold a meeting at the Center
for Character and Leadership
Development Building, U.S. Air Force
Academy, Colorado Springs, CO on Sept
7 & 8, 2016. On Wednesday, Sept 7, the
meeting will begin at 1300 and conclude
at 1600. On Thursday, Sept 8, the
meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m. and
conclude at 1515. The purpose of this
meeting is to review morale and
discipline, social climate, curriculum,
instruction, infrastructure, fiscal affairs,
academic methods, and other matters
relating to the Academy. Specific topics
for this meeting include a
Superintendent’s Update; USAFA NonProfits Update; Religious Respect
Update; USAFA Academics Update;
USAFA’s Climate Assessment Survey
Results. Public attendance at this
USAFA BoV meeting shall be
accommodated on a first-come, firstserved basis up to the reasonable and
safe capacity of the meeting room. In
addition, any member of the public
wishing to provide input to the USAFA
BoV should submit a written statement
in accordance with 41 CFR Section 102–
3.140(c) and section 10(a)(3) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act and
the procedures described in this
paragraph. Written statements must
address the following details: The issue,
discussion, and a recommended course
of action. Supporting documentation
may also be included as needed to
establish the appropriate historical

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00027

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 9990

context and provide any necessary
background information. Written
statements can be submitted to the
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the
Air Force address detailed below at any
time. However, if a written statement is
not received at least 10 calendar days
before the first day of the meeting which
is the subject of this notice, then it may
not be provided to or considered by the
BoV until its next open meeting. The
DFO will review all timely submissions
with the BoV Chairman and ensure they
are provided to members of the BoV
before the meeting that is the subject of
this notice. If after review of timely
submitted written comments and the
BoV Chairman and DFO deem
appropriate, they may choose to invite
the submitter of the written comments
to orally present the issue during an
open portion of the BoV meeting that is
the subject of this notice. Members of
the BoV may also petition the Chairman
to allow specific personnel to make oral
presentations before the BoV. In
accordance with 41 CFR Section 102–
3.140(d), any oral presentations before
the BoV shall be in accordance with
agency guidelines provided pursuant to
a written invitation and this paragraph.
Direct questioning of BoV members or
meeting participants by the public is not
permitted except with the approval of
the DFO and Chairman. For the benefit
of the public, rosters that list the names
of BoV members and any releasable
materials presented during the open
portions of this BoV meeting shall be
made available upon request.
For
additional information or to attend this
BoV meeting, contact Major James
Kuchta, Accessions and Training
Division, AF/A1PT, 1040 Air Force
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330, (703)
695–4066, James.L.Kuchta.mil@
mail.mil.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Henry Williams,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–19783 Filed 8–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P

E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM

19AUN1