Form 1 3 Year Posst Project Survey

Fast Track Generic Clearance for Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

3 Year Post Project Survey

ANA Sustainablility Servicers Survey

OMB: 0970-0401

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

ANA Three-Year Post Project Target Impact Indicator Services Survey


THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.08 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
















































Expiration date: 5/31/2018 OMB Control No: 0970-0401

Shape1 Section A) Impact Indicators




Please list the impact indicators used in your grant application and the status of those indicators at each point in time.


  1. Impact Indicators


Indicator


Status Prior to the Project (Baseline)


End of Project Target


Actual Change at End of Project Period


Three Year Target (Projected Change)


Actual change at Three Year Target


Was this a realistic impact indicator? If not, why?

Shape2 Section B) Sustainability





  1. To what extent are project activities on-going?




Other/Please provide a description of the extent to project activities:





  1. What were the greatest contributing factors to sustaining project activities?





  1. What were your greatest challenges to sustaining project activities?





  1. Services


What services did ANA provide to better assist with sustainability?


How could ANA better serve you to achieve project sustainability?



  1. If applicable, how has the project data been maintained and/or used?





  1. Did you receive TA at any point during the project period? If so, did it contribute to the level of sustainability?





  1. What would you have changed in planning the grant? (if involved)





  1. What would you have changed in implementing the grant?





  1. Are the impacts of the ANA grant still visible in the community?

  2. Shape3 Partnerships at End of Grant vs 3 Year Post Project


Shape4 # of new partnerships at end of grant (if different than information provided):


Shape5 # of new partnerships 3 year post project:


Shape6 # of pre-existing partnerships at end of grant (if different than information provided):


Shape7 # of pre-existing partnerships at end of grant:


Shape8 Top 3 partners at end of grant (if different than information provided):


Shape9 Top 3 partners 3 year post project:



  1. Level of Funding at End of Grant


No funds secured Still seeking funding

Some additional funding secured Desired level of funding secured No additional funding needed



  1. Current level of funding


No funds for project activities


Seeking funding for project activities Some funding secured

Desired level of funding secured No additional funding needed



  1. Beneficiaries at End of Grant vs 3 Year Post Project


Shape10 Beneficiaries at end of grant (if different than information provided):


Shape11 Additional Beneficiaries 3 Year Post Project:

  1. Shape12 Shape13 Did your marketing and outreach activities change?





  1. Shape14 How has project staffing changed?





  1. Shape15 Best practices to share in regards to sustainability?

Shape16 Program Area Specific (Language)




Please fill this section out if your project was a language grant.


  1. What services can ANA provide to specifically help [INSERT PROGRAM AREA] grantees?





  1. Status of language (if applicable)


Status of language prior to the project:


Status of language at end of grant:


Current status of language:


How was the status determined?


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleView Survey
AuthorZukowski, Amy (ACF)
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy