ss for colombia avocadoes FR

ss for colombia avocadoes FR.docx

Importation of Hass Avocadoes from Colombia

OMB: 0579-0459

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

August 2017

Supporting Statement

Importation of Hass Avocadoes from Colombia

Docket No. APHIS-2016-0022

OMB No. 0579-0459


A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.


The United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), is responsible for preventing plant diseases or insect pests from entering the

United States, preventing the spread of pests and noxious weeds not widely distributed in the United States, and eradicating those imported pests when eradication is feasible. The Plant Protection Act authorizes the Department to carry out its mission.


Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701, et seq.) the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to prohibit or restrict the importation, entry, or movement of plants and plant pests to prevent the introduction of plant pests into the United States or their dissemination within the United States.


The regulations in “Subpart – Fruits and Vegetables” (Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 319.56 through 319.56-75, referred to as the regulations), prohibit or restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the United States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and dissemination of plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed within the United States.


APHIS amended the fruits and vegetables regulations to allow the importation of Hass avocados from Colombia into the continental United States. As a condition of entry, Hass avocados from Colombia have to be produced in accordance with a systems approach that includes, but not limited to, requirements for importation in commercial consignments; registration and monitoring of places of production and packinghouses; pest-free places of production; grove sanitation, monitoring, and pest control practices; lot identification; and inspection for quarantine pests by the Colombian National Plant Protection Organization (NPPO). Additionally, avocados from Colombia are required to be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate with an additional declaration stating that the avocados have been produced in accordance with the requirements.


APHIS is asking OMB to approve, for 3 years, its use of these information collection activities, associated with its efforts to prevent the spread of plant pests and noxious weeds from entering into the United States.



2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


APHIS uses the following information collection activities to ensure that Hass avocadoes from Colombia adhere to the regulations by using the systems approach as required.

7CFR 319.56-76(a)(1) Operational Workplan (foreign government) - The NPPO of Colombia must provide an operational workplan to APHIS that details the activities that the NPPO of Colombia and places of production and packinghouses registered with the NPPO of Colombia will, subject to APHIS' approval of the workplan, carry out to meet the requirements of this section. The operational workplan must include and describe the specific requirements as set forth in this section. APHIS will be directly involved with the NPPO of Colombia in monitoring and auditing implementation of the systems approach.

7CFR 319.56-76(a)(2) Production Site Registration (business and foreign government) - The fresh avocados considered for export to the continental United States must be grown by places of production that are registered with the NPPO of Colombia and that have been determined to be free from H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, and S. catenifer.


7CFR 319.56-76(a)(3) Packinghouse Registration (business and foreign government) - The avocados must be packed for export to the continental United States in pest-exclusionary packinghouses that are registered with the NPPO of Colombia.


7CFR 319.56-76(b)(1) Inspections (business and foreign government) - The NPPO of Colombia must visit and inspect registered places of production monthly, starting at least 2 months before harvest and continuing until the end of the shipping season, to verify that the growers are complying with the grove sanitation requirements of this section and following pest control guidelines, when necessary, to reduce quarantine pest populations.


7CFR 319.56-76(b)(1) Personnel Training Program (foreign government) - Any personnel conducting trapping and pest surveys under this section at registered places of production must be hired, trained, and supervised by the NPPO of Colombia. The training program includes theoretical and practical sessions, in both laboratories and the field. Theoretical sessions deal with taxonomy, bio-ecology, damage symptoms, pest management, monitoring methodology, and forms handling. Practical sessions in laboratories deal with breeding procedures, for two or more quarantine pest species. The practical sessions in the field are a module carried out at places of production with or without the presence of quarantine pests.

7CFR 319.56-76(b)(2) Monitoring (business and foreign government) - In addition to conducting fruit inspections at the packinghouses, the NPPO of Colombia must monitor packinghouse operations to verify that the packinghouses are complying with the requirements of this section.


7CFR 319.56-76(b)(3) Investigations of Production Site or Packinghouse (business and foreign government) - If the NPPO of Colombia finds that a place of production or packinghouse is not complying with the requirements of this section, no avocados from the place of production or packinghouse will be eligible for export to the United States until APHIS and the NPPO of Colombia conduct an investigation and agree that appropriate remedial actions have been implemented.


7CFR 319.56-76(b)(4) Recordkeeping (foreign government) - The NPPO of Colombia must retain all forms and documents related to export program activities in places of production and packinghouses for at least 1 year and, as requested, provide them to APHIS for review.


7CFR 319.56-76 (d) Survey Protocol (foreign government) - Avocados must either be

grown in places of production located in departments of Colombia that are designated as free of H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, and S. catenifer or be grown in places of production that have been surveyed by the NPPO of Colombia and have been determined to be free of these pests. If the latter, the NPPO must maintain a buffer zone of 1 kilometer around the perimeter of the place of production, and must survey representative areas of the place of production and buffer zone for H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, and S. catenifer monthly, beginning no more than 2 months before harvest, in accordance with a survey protocol approved by APHIS.


7CFR 319.56-76 (d) Investigation of Survey Protocol Violations (business and foreign government) - If one or more H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, or S. catenifer is detected during a survey of the place of production or buffer zone, the place of production will be suspended from the export program for avocados to the continental United States until APHIS and the NPPO of Colombia conduct an investigation and agree that appropriate remedial actions to reestablish pest freedom have been implemented.


7CFR 319.56-76 (e) Carton Markings (business) - Harvested avocados must be placed in field cartons or containers that are marked with the official registration number of the place of production. The place of production where the avocados were grown must remain identifiable when the fruit leaves the grove, at the packinghouse, and throughout the export process.


7CFR 319.56-76 (f)(4) Shipping Documents (business) - Shipping documents accompanying consignments of avocados from Colombia that are exported to the United States must specify the place of production at which the avocados were grown as well as the packing shed or sheds in which the fruit was processed and packed. This identification must be maintained until the fruit is released for entry into the United States.


7CFR 319.56-76 (g) Post Harvest Inspection and Investigation (business and foreign government) - Following any post-harvest processing, inspectors from the NPPO of Colombia must visually inspect a biometric sample of fruit from each place of production at a rate to be determined by APHIS. The inspectors must visually inspect for quarantine pests, and must cut a portion of the fruit to inspect for H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, and S. catenifer. If a single quarantine pest is detected during this inspection protocol, the consignment from which the sample was taken is prohibited from being shipped to the United States.


Additionally, if a single H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, or S. catenifer at any life stage is detected during this inspection, the place of production of the infested avocados will be suspended from the export program for avocados to the continental United States until APHIS and the NPPO of Colombia conduct an investigation and agree that appropriate remedial actions to reestablish pest freedom have been implemented.


7CFR 319.56-76 (h) Phytosanitary Certificate (business and foreign government) - Each consignment of Hass avocados from Colombia must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO of Colombia with an additional declaration stating that the avocados in the consignment were produced in accordance with this section and the operational workplan.



3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any considerations of using information technology to reduce burden.


APHIS has no control or influence over when foreign countries will automate their certificates or written agreements. However, APHIS is involved with the Government-wide utilization of the International Trade Data System (ITDS) via the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) to improve business operations and further Agency missions.  This will allow respondents to submit the data required by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and its Partner Government Agencies (PGAs), such as APHIS  to import and export cargo through a Single Window concept.  APHIS is also establishing a system known as e-File for CARPOL (Certification, Accreditation, Registration, Permitting, and Other Licensing) activities.  This new system will strive to automate some of these information collection activities.  The system is still being developed and business processes continue to be identified and mapped.



4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use of the purpose described in item 2 above.


The information APHIS collects is exclusive to its mission of preventing the spread of plant pests and noxious weeds and is not available from any other source.



5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


The information APHIS collects is the minimum needed to protect the United States from destructive plant pests while increasing the number and variety of fruits and vegetables that can be imported from other countries. APHIS has determined that there are no small entities associated with this information collection.



6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


Failing to collect this information would cripple APHIS’ ability to ensure that Hass avocadoes from Colombia are not carrying plant pests or noxious weeds. If plant pests or noxious weeds were introduced into the United States, growers would suffer hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.



7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.


  • requiring respondents to report informa­tion to the agency more often than quarterly;

The NPPO of Colombia must visit and inspect registered places of production monthly, starting at least 2 months before harvest and continuing until the end of the shipping season, to verify that the growers are complying with the grove sanitation requirements of this section and following pest control guidelines, when necessary, to reduce quarantine pest populations.


Avocados must either be grown in places of production located in departments of Colombia that are designated as free of H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, and S. catenifer or be grown in places of production that have been surveyed by the NPPO of Colombia and have been determined to be free of these pests. If the latter, the NPPO must maintain a buffer zone of 1 kilometer around the perimeter of the place of production, and must survey representative areas of the place of production and buffer zone for H. lauri, H. trifasciatus, and S. catenifer monthly, beginning no more than 2 months before harvest, in accordance with a survey protocol approved by APHIS.


  • requiring respondents to prepare a writ­ten response to a collection of infor­ma­tion in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any docu­ment;

  • requiring respondents to retain re­cords, other than health, medical, governm­ent contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

  • in connection with a statisti­cal sur­vey, that is not de­signed to produce valid and reli­able results that can be general­ized to the uni­verse of study;

  • requiring the use of a statis­tical data classi­fication that has not been re­vie­wed and approved by OMB;

  • that includes a pledge of confiden­tiali­ty that is not supported by au­thority estab­lished in statute or regu­la­tion, that is not sup­ported by dis­closure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unneces­sarily impedes shar­ing of data with other agencies for com­patible confiden­tial use; or



  • requiring respondents to submit propri­etary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demon­strate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permit­ted by law.


No other special circumstances exist that would require this collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.



8. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.


The following individuals were recently consulted regarding this program:


Juan Camilo Ruiz,

Executive Director

Corpoaguacate

Carrera 48 # 101 SUR 401 Bodega 4 La Estrella,

Antioquia

(+562) 317-643-2070


Andrés Eduardo Mejía,

Executive Director

CORPOHASS

Calle 85 Nº 48-01, Bl. 31, Of. 806

Itagüí, Antioquia, Colombia

(+562) 27171114


Aurelio Iragorri

Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development

Km 17 Recta Cali-Palmira,

Apartado Aéreo 6713, 763537  

Cali, Colombia.

(+562) 27170670


APHIS’ Proposed Rule (Docket No. APHIS-2016-0022) was published in the Federal Register on October 27, 2016, with a 60-day comment period. APHIS reopened and extended the deadline for comments until February 16, 2017, and again extended the reopened comment period until March 20, 2017. APHIS received 43 comments from producers, exporters, industry groups, and representatives of State and foreign governments. Of these, 32 were fully supportive of the proposed action. The remaining 11 raised issues that are addressed in the final rule. Comments dealt with the pest list, systems approach, keeping avocado fruit produced domestically, and keeping the fruit grown organically. APHIS’ proposed rule was adopted as the final rule on Tuesday, August 15, 2017.



9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than reenumeration of contractors or grantees.


This information collection activity involves no payments or gifts to respondents.



10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


APHIS implements the Confidential Business Information (CBI) policy and procedures to ensure claims are reviewed in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), exemption 4

(5 U.S.C 552(b)(4). CBI is protected from mandatory public disclosure under this Act. Any and all information obtained in this collection shall not be disclosed except in accordance with

5 U.S.C. 552a.



11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and others that are considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


This information collection activity asks no questions of a personal or sensitive nature.



12. Provide estimates of hour burden of the collection of information. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated.


. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.


See APHIS Form 71 for hour burden estimates.


. Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.

APHIS estimates the annualized cost to the respondents to be $259,276. APHIS arrived at this figure by multiplying the total burden hours (9,784) by the estimated average hourly wage of the above respondents ($26.50). $26.50 x 9,784 = $259, 276


The estimated wage was derived from the APHIS International Services attache located in Colombia.



13. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information (do not include the cost of any hour burden in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.


There is zero annual cost burden associated with the capital and start-up cost, maintenance costs, and purchase of services in connection with this program.



14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


The estimated cost to the Federal Government is $36,292. (See APHIS Form 79.)



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB 83-1.


This is a new program.



16. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.


APHIS has no plans to tabulate or publish the information collected.



17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


There are no USDA forms included in this information collection.



18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act.”


APHIS is able to certify compliance with all the provisions under the Act.



B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods.


Statistical methods are not used in this information collection.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorGilbert, Lynn - APHIS
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy