Submitting Organization | Comment ID | Topic | Recommended comment reviewers | Comment/comment summary | Disposition of Comment | ||
Health Detail | 004 | JSON | Ryan | The term "machine readable" is from the 1970s when computers had punch cards. Also, it is too ambiguous as, in theory, a machine can read most any type of format, though it may not be in a format that can be imported into a DB or analyzed ("non-structured"). The regulations go on to state that the format will be decided by HHS. If that is the case then we would strongly suggest that the format be general enough to provide enough differentiation for QHPs in the presentation of its different directories. (For provider directories, some QHPs have the ability to display one provider with many addresses, whereas others will display the same provider multiple times with the different addresses.) While the latter is not ideal, changing this would require significant investments in some cases. HHS requiring "XML or CSV format" enables the information to be imported into a database and analyzed, which we believe was the intent. | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (benefits) | Remove this field (network tier) from plans.json | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (Rx) | remove Drug Tier and Cost Sharing | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | remove plan contact | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (benefits) | delete specialty field | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (benefits) | delete "accepting patients" field | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (benefits) | delete facility type | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (Rx) | Remove drug-name | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (Rx) | Remove quantity limits | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (Rx) | Remove drug tiers | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (Rx) | Remove cost-sharing sub-type | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | Bill, PM (Rx) | Include formulary ID | Accept | ||
BCBSA | 005 | Data collected | PM (Leigha) | Remove "not less than monthly" | Reject | ||
BCBSA | 005 | 3rd party access | PM (Leigha) | Add data use agreement | Reject | ||
Delta Dental | 006 | Dental | Bill, PM (dental) | recommend that CMS consider the unique characteristics of dental providers when finalizing these fields. For example, “facility type” for a dental provider may be different than for other types of major medical providers. Specialty type is also unique for dental providers | Reject (consider for future) | ||
PCMA | 007 | Terminology | PM (LAB) | Clarify intended users “third-parties” or “software developers” or “developers” or “marketplace consumers” or “enrollees” | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Terminology | Bill, PM | Recommend that CMS clarify that consumers do not have access to these files on the issuer’s websites. Consumers will not understand the information presented in this format (whether JSON or another format). |
Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | 3rd party access | PM (UNKN) | We also would appreciate information on how CMS intends to use the information it collects under this PRA (list of sample questions about use on page 4) | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | JSON | Bill, Ryan | As an alternative to JSON, we would recommend any of the following formats: Medicare Plan Finder, .txt, or .csv. Unlike with JSON, there is wide industry experience with these other formats. | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Terminology | Bill, PM (Rx) | We also strongly urge that CMS confirm that plans do not have to include all formulations of drugs on the formulary. | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Data collected | Bill, PM (Rx) | We recommend deletion of quantity limits, as there is such a large range of what can be in place due to the drug safety considerations. | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Timing | Bill, PM | We seek a delay in effective date until 2017. | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Compliance | Bill, PM | We request that 2016 be treated as a trial or “soft rollout” year. | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Timing | Bill, PM | CMS could pilot this initiative and see how it works in a few states for formulary drugs lists. | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Timing | Bill, PM, Ryan | Another alternative would be to allow issuers to format the lists of formulary drugs the same as is done for the QHP submission, create a file format, and allow that format to be used (true non-duplication of effort). At the same time, CMS could undertake a pilot as well. | Reject | ||
PCMA | 007 | Compliance | PM (Compliance) | If CMS insists on full implementation for 2016, then a good faith compliance standard should be used. | Reject | ||
Community Catalyst | 008 | Data collected | Bill, PM | Add physical accessibility of providers’ office | Reject | ||
United Concordia | 009 | Dental | PM (Leigha) | Stand-alone dental plans offering exchange certified off-exchange policies should be exempt from the machine-readable requirements | Reject | ||
United Concordia | 009 | 3rd party access | PM (UNKN) | CMS set conditions on third party access to ensure that the general public does not have access to the JSON files and develop standards that address limitations on third party use of the data | Reject (duplicate) | ||
United Concordia | 009 | Dental | PM (Leigha) | If stand-alone dental plans are not exempt from this requirement then CMS should phase in the machine-readable requirements for “Exchange certified” dental networks starting in 2017 | Reject | ||
United Concordia | 009 | 3rd party access | PM (UNKN) | CMS should clarify that making the information available does not provide the public with unrestricted access to the JSON files and confirm that only approved third party software developers have access. | Reject (duplicate) | ||
United Concordia | 009 | 3rd party access | PM (UNKN) | CMS should set conditions on third party access and develop standards that address limitations on the use of the data | Reject (duplicate) | ||
United Concordia | 009 | 3rd party access | PM (LAB) | CMS should address how a third party will be held accountable for inconsistencies between the issuer’s data files and what is posted on the third party’s website | Reject (duplicate) | ||
National Association of Dental Plans | 010 | Dental | PM (Leigha) | Standalone dental plans offering “Exchange‐certified” dental policies off the Exchange, in the private market, should be exempt from the requirement to submit machine‐readable provider network data. | Reject (duplicate) | ||
National Association of Dental Plans | 010 | Dental | PM (Leigha) | Phase in dental networks participating on Exchanges starting in 2017 | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Recommends that in year one, provider and Rx cost share not be included | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Reduce the number of data elements in the plan file to simplify (list of suggested fields on page 3) | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Remove email address for contact for errors | Reject | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM (beneftis,) Ryan | Remove network tier | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM (benefits and Rx), Ryan | Remove cost-sharing sub-type | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Provide directory URL | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Provide formulary URL | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Reduce the number of data elements in the provider file (suggestions on pages 5 and 6) | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Reduce the number of data elements in the drug file (suggestions on pages 6 and 7) | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | JSON | PM, Ryan | Recommend formulary data be listed by formulary ID, then each plan can be associated with the proper formulary ID | Reject | ||
AHIP | 012 | Timing | Bill, PM, Ryan | Recommend that for 2016 data collection happen with existing QHP templates (which AHIP called "machine readable") and institute JSON for 2017. | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM | Recommend no pharmacies or laboratories be included | Reject | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | PM (Rx) | Recommend plans not include all formulations of drugs on formulary | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | JSON | PM (Rx) | Recommend plans have flexibility about how to populate non-preferred tiers of an open formulary, and that "default" drugs be sufficient for all non-preferred drugs | Reject (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Timing | Bill | Recommend that live links not be required before 10/15/2015 and that the date the links are required be provided by CMS as soon as possible. | Reject in part; accept in part (already allows) (duplicate) | ||
AHIP | 012 | JSON | Bill, PM, Ryan | Recommend specifying that the level of data files be at the issuer level. | Reject | ||
AHIP | 012 | 3rd party access | Bill, PM, Ryan | Create a contact registry for all third-party users | Reject | ||
Harvard Pilgrim | 013 | Timing | PM (UNKN) | Recommends implementation not before 1/1/2016 | Reject (duplicate) | ||
Harvard Pilgrim | 013 | Compliance | PM (Adam) | If implementation prior to 1/1/2016, requests safe harbor for year 1 | Reject (duplicate) | ||
Families USA | 018 | 3rd party access | PM (UNKN) | Specifically, we believe that safeguards must be in place to ensure that third parties will use the most up-to-date versions of provider directories and formularies to populate their tools, and be held accountable for doing so, such as through user agreements they sign. At no point should third parties be using data that is less up to date than the data that issuers use to populate their provider directories and formularies, and issuers should be required to update their publicly available machine-readable files every 30 days | Reject (duplicate) | ||
Families USA | 018 | JSON | Bill, PM, Ryan | Strongly support including “network tier,” but would recommend adding in example values of “tier 1, tier 2, tier 3,” to reflect common structures of network tiers | Reject | ||
Families USA | 018 | Data collected | Bill, PM, Ryan | Physical accessibility of the provider’s facilities | Reject | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, PM | Allow future effective date providers | Reject (consider for future) | ||
AHIP | 012 | Data collected | Bill, Ryan | Primary care status indicator | Reject | ||
StrideHealth.com | 020 | JSON | Ryan | When formatted in a standardized, accessible manner, the data collection activities contemplated by this Notice create little to no additional burden on insurance carriers instead, we suggest mere reorganization of information already possessed and electronically organized by carriers. If that information is provided in a standardized format with the relevant context of the plans Summary of Benefits and Coverage, we believe they will be of maximum public utility | Reject | ||
David Portnoy HHS IDEA Lab EntrepreneurinResidence | 019 | JSON | Fields specified by Medicare for a Model Provider Directory , consider adding these: i. plan.json 1. Description of plan’s service area 2. Customer service phone number 3. Customer service hours of operation 4. Network services: healthcare/vision/dental ii. provider.json 1. Provider type is defined more specifically: PCPs, Specialists, Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Outpatient Mental Health Providers, Pharmacies (rather than Individual, Facility) 2. Neighborhood for larger cities (optional) 3. Provider website & email address (optional) 4. Provider supports eprescribing |
Some reject (consider for future); some accept (already allows) | |||
David Portnoy HHS IDEA Lab EntrepreneurinResidence | 019 | JSON | Besides JSON, consider giving plans an option to provide their submission in an HTML with microdata format. The reason is that for some, it’s advantageous to have both human and machine readable data in a single document, rather than needing to maintain synchronization between them. Webmasters might find microdata easier to work with than managing separate endpoints for JSON files. And microdata can still be validated and converted into JSON. (There are already many ways to extract JSON from microdata. For example, making an API call to http://rdftranslator. appspot.com/convert/microdata/jsonld/ <source_URL>) |
Reject | |||
David Portnoy HHS IDEA Lab EntrepreneurinResidence | 019 | JSON | I propose implementing a proof of concept on the proposed schema with Medicare Advantage plans, as a way to more adequately assess the burden and schema effectiveness, as well as serving as a concrete example for QHPs to follow. |
Reject |
Comment Category | Number of comments | Number of commentors | Commentors |
JSON | 28 | 12 | AHIP, BCBSA, Clear Choice, Consumers Union, Delta Dental, Family USA, Health Detail, National Association of Dental Plans, PCMA, United Concordia, StrideHealth, David Portnoy |
Dental | 8 | 8 | Delta Dental, United Concordia, National Association of Dental Plans |
Timing of implementation | 15 | 7 | BCSA, Delta Dental, PCMA, United Concordia, AHIP, Harvard Pilgrim, Clear Choice |
Data Collected | 47 | 6 | BCBSA, Community Catalyst, AHIP, Clear Choice, Families USA |
3rd party access | 11 | 5 | AHIP, BCBSA, Family USA, PCMA, United Concordia |
General Support | 5 | 5 | PCMA, FHA, AHIP, Clear Choice |
Partnership (with state and industry) | 4 | 4 | PCMA, United Concordia, AHIP |
Terminology in PRA | 7 | 3 | PCMA, Community Catalyst, Clear Choice |
Compliance | 7 | 3 | PCMA, Harvard Pilgrim, Families USA |
Burden | 4 | 3 | BCBSA, PCMA, United Concordia |
Legality | 3 | 3 | Anonymous, Anonymous, Anonymous |
Timing of updates | 2 | 2 | AHIP, PCMA |
Vendor compliance | 1 | 1 | National Association of Dental Plans |
RXNorm update by CMS | 1 | 1 | AHIP |
Needed CMS guidance | 1 | 1 | AHIP |
Integration with MA, etc. | 1 | 1 | Families USA |
Total | 145 |
Section Edited | Paragraph/page | Sentence | From | To | Reason |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 2 | Yes | Always | Comment to clarify | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 2 | N/A | Added Formulary URL field | Comment to include formulary URLs in JSON--optional | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 3 | network tier | Moved | Moved to network sub-type | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 3 | N/A | Added benefits field | Include to capture benefits array for subtypes | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 3 | N/A | Added last updated on field | track data updates from issuers | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 3 | drug tier | Moved | Moved to formulary sub-type | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 5 | N/A | Beneftis sub-type section | Comment to include benefits sub-type | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 5 | N/A | telemedicine | Comment to include telemedicine as an optional field | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 5 | Percentage | Rate | Improved terminology | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 5 | No | Always | Comment to require coinsurance qualifier | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 7 | Nothing | Plans | Make plans an array | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 7 | Nothing | Added last updated on field | track data updates from issuers | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 8 | Always | No | Make middle name optional | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 8 | N/A | Street Address | additonal field for better address collection | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 8 | string | array | specialty as an array | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 8 | Nothing | Gender | Comment to add gender of provider | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 8 | Nothing | languages | Comment to add languages spoken | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 8 | Nothing | Street Address | additonal field for better address collection | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 11 | formularies it is part of | plans that cover them | Improved terminology | |
Developer Documentation Appendix A | 11 | Formulary ID | Plans | Provide tie from drugs to plans | |
Developer Documentation Appendix B | Index Schema | Add schema for indexing |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |