2017-11-13_SS_1545-0024r(N)

2017-11-13_SS_1545-0024r(N).doc

Form 843 - Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement

OMB: 1545-0024

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

4



SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Internal Revenue Service

(Form 843) Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement)

OMB #1545-0024


  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Sections 6402, 6404, and 6511 of the Internal Revenue Code, and sections 301.6402-2, 301.6404-1, and 301.6404-3 of the Regulations allow for refunds of taxes (other than income taxes) which were erroneously or excessively collected. Form 843 is used to claim or request (a) a refund of one of the taxes (other than income taxes or an employer’s claim for FICA tax, RRTA tax, or income tax withholding) or a fee, (b) an abatement of FUTA tax or certain excise taxes, or (c) a refund or abatement of interest, penalties, or additions to tax.


2. USE OF DATA


The information supplied on Form 843 is used by the IRS to determine the accuracy of the claim filed.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


Electronic filing of Form 843 is not currently available due to the low number of filers. IRS has determined that the relatively low volume does not justify the cost of electronic enabling.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.

5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Small businesses should not be disadvantaged as the form has been structured to request the least amount of information and still satisfy the requirements of the statute and the needs of the Service.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


A less frequent collection of this information would not allow the IRS to determine the accuracy of the claim filed therefore not allowing the IRS to meet its mission.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Periodic meetings are held between IRS personnel and representatives of the American Bar Association, the National Society of Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and other professional groups to discuss tax law and tax forms. During these meetings, there is an opportunity for those attending to make comments regarding Form 843.


In response to the Federal Register notice dated September 29, 2017 (82 FR 45677), we received no comments during the comment period regarding Form 843.


9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift will be provided to any respondents.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, Treasury has published its complete Privacy Act systems of records notices, which include all maintained records systems as of January 2, 2014; six systems have been amended, altered, or added since April 20, 2010, when the complete notices were last published. See 79 F.R. 209-261 and 79 FR 183-206, which was published on January 2, 2014.


A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Individual Master File (IMF)” system and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for this system under IRS 24.030--Customer Account Data Engine Individual Master File, formerly Individual Master File, and IRS 34.037--IRS Audit Trail and Security Records System. The Department of Treasury PIAs can be found at http://www.treasury.gov/privacy/PIAs/Pages/default.aspx.


Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


The burden estimate is as follows:


Authority

Description

# of Respondents

#Responses per Respondent

Annual Responses

Hours per Response

Total Burden

IRC § § 6402, 6404, 6511

Form

843

550,500

1

550,500

1.59

875,295

Totals


550,500



875,295

Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.


The following regulations impose no additional burden. Please continue to assign OMB number 1545-0024 to these regulations.


301.6402-2 31.3503-1 301.6404-1

301.6404-2 301.6404-3 301.6511(a)-1

301.6511(b)-1 301.6511(f)-1 301.6403-1

53.4961-2 53.4963-1 301.6405-1


We have reviewed the regulations and have determined that the reporting requirements contained in them are entirely reflected on the form. The justification appearing in item 1 of the supporting statement applies both to the regulations and the form.


13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is

currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs.

Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect

a more precise estimate of burden and costs.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


The primary cost to the government consists of the cost of printing Form 8606. We estimate that the cost of printing the form is $5,597.



15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There are no changes to the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. This form is being submitted for renewal purposes only.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis, and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the form sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the IRS intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorJ11FB
Last Modified BySYSTEM
File Modified2017-11-14
File Created2017-11-14

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy