Senate Report 113-85

SR 113_85.pdf

Building Healthy Military Communities Pilot - Rapid Needs Assessment

Senate Report 113-85

OMB: 0704-0572

Document [pdf]

Download: pdf | pdf

Calendar No. 163
113TH CONGRESS
"
1st Session

SENATE

REPORT
113–85

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2014

AUGUST 1, 2013.—Ordered to be printed

Mr. DURBIN, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following

REPORT
[To accompany S. 1429]

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1429) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass.
New obligational authority
Total of bill as reported to the Senate .................... $587,462,934,000
Amount of 2013 appropriations 1 ............................. 596,970,970,000
Amount of 2014 budget estimate ............................ 589,636,069,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to—
2013 appropriations .......................................... ¥9,508,036,000
2014 budget estimate ........................................ ¥2,173,135,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–

25.

82–263 PDF

CONTENTS
Background:
Purpose of the Bill ............................................................................................
Hearings ............................................................................................................
Summary of the Bill .........................................................................................
Definition of Program, Project and Activity ...................................................
Committee Initiatives .......................................................................................
Title I:
Military Personnel:
Military Personnel Overview ....................................................................
Military Personnel, Army .........................................................................
Military Personnel, Navy ..........................................................................
Military Personnel, Marine Corps ...........................................................
Military Personnel, Air Force ...................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Army ..........................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Navy ..........................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps ............................................................
Reserve Personnel, Air Force ...................................................................
National Guard Personnel, Army ............................................................
National Guard Personnel, Air Force ......................................................
Title II:
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army .........................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Navy ..........................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ............................................
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ...................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide ............................................
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve ...........................................
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve ............................................
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve .............................
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve .....................................
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard ..............................
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard ..................................
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ...........................................
Environmental Restoration, Army ...........................................................
Environmental Restoration, Navy ...........................................................
Environmental Restoration, Air Force ....................................................
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide .............................................
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites ...................
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid ..................................
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account ...................................................
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund ......
Title III:
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army .....................................................................
Missile Procurement, Army ......................................................................
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army ...........
Procurement of Ammunition, Army .........................................................
Other Procurement, Army ........................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Navy .....................................................................
Weapons Procurement, Navy ...................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps .........................
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy ........................................................
Other Procurement, Navy .........................................................................
Procurement, Marine Corps .....................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ..............................................................
(2)

Page

5
5
5
6
7
17
18
20
22
24
26
27
28
29
30
31
37
41
44
46
49
53
54
55
56
57
59
60
60
60
60
60
61
61
61
62
66
70
71
76
79
88
93
96
99
102
111
115

3
Page

Title III—Continued
Procurement—Continued
Missile Procurement, Air Force ................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ..................................................
Other Procurement, Air Force ..................................................................
Procurement, Defense-Wide .....................................................................
Defense Production Act Purchases ..........................................................
National Guard and Reserve Equipment ................................................
Title IV:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army .............................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy .............................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force ......................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide ...............
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense .............................................
Title V:
Revolving and Management Funds:
Defense Working Capital Funds ..............................................................
National Defense Sealift Fund .................................................................
Title VI:
Other Department of Defense Programs:
Defense Health Program ..........................................................................
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense ..........................
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense ......................
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ....................................................
Office of the Inspector General ................................................................
Title VII:
Related Agencies:
Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System
Fund ........................................................................................................
Intelligence Community Management Account ......................................
Title VIII: General Provisions ................................................................................
Title IX: Overseas Deployments and Other Programs:
Department of Defense—Military ...................................................................
Military Personnel:
Military Personnel, Army .........................................................................
Military Personnel, Navy ..........................................................................
Military Personnel, Marine Corps ...........................................................
Military Personnel, Air Force ...................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Army ..........................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Navy ..........................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps ............................................................
Reserve Personnel, Air Force ...................................................................
National Guard Personnel, Army ............................................................
National Guard Personnel, Air Force ......................................................
Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army .........................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Navy ..........................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ............................................
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ...................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide ............................................
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve ...........................................
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve ............................................
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve .............................
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve .....................................
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard ..............................
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard ..................................
Afghanistan Infrastucture Fund ..............................................................
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund ..........................................................
Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army .....................................................................
Missile Procurement, Army ......................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Army .........................................................
Other Procurement, Army ........................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Navy .....................................................................
Weapons Procurement, Navy ...................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps .........................
Other Procurement, Navy .........................................................................

121
126
128
132
137
140
146
154
163
172
181
183
184
185
195
197
197
198

199
199
200
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
212
213
213
214
214
216
217
217
218
219
219
220
220
220
221
221
222
224
224
225
225
226
227
227
228

4
Page

Title IX—Continued
Procurement—Continued
Procurement, Marine Corps .....................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ..............................................................
Missile Procurement, Air Force ................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ..................................................
Other Procurement, Air Force ..................................................................
Procurement, Defense-Wide .....................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army .............................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy .............................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force ......................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide ...............
Revolving and Management Funds: Defense Working Capital Funds ........
Other Department of Defense Programs:
Defense Health Program ..........................................................................
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense ......................
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund ....................................
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ....................................................
Office of the Inspector General ................................................................
General Provisions—This Title ................................................................
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the
Senate ...................................................................................................................
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the
Senate ...................................................................................................................
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the
Senate ...................................................................................................................
Budgetary Impact of Bill .........................................................................................
Comparative Statement of Budget Authority ........................................................

228
229
229
230
230
230
231
231
232
232
232
233
233
234
235
235
235
237
239
239
240
241

BACKGROUND
PURPOSE

OF THE

BILL

This bill makes appropriations for the military functions of the
Department of Defense for the period October 1, 2013, through
September 30, 2014. Functional areas include the pay, allowances,
and support of military personnel, operation and maintenance of
the forces, procurement of equipment and systems, and research,
development, test and evaluation. Appropriations for foreign military assistance, military construction, family housing, nuclear
weapons programs, and civil defense are provided in other bills.
HEARINGS
The Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense began hearings on
April 17, 2013, and concluded them on July 17, 2013, after nine
separate sessions. The subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the Department of Defense, other Federal agencies,
and representatives of organizations.
SUMMARY

OF THE

BILL

The Committee recommendation of $587,462,934,000 includes
funding to develop, maintain, and equip the military forces of the
United States in nonemergency appropriations.
The fiscal year 2014 budget request for activities funded in the
Department of Defense appropriations bill totals $589,636,069,000
in new budget authority, including $80,558,154,000 in contingency
funding and $514,000,000 in mandatory spending.
In fiscal year 2013, the Congress appropriated $596,970,970,000
for activities funded in this bill. This amount includes
$509,927,697,000 in nonemergency appropriations, $86,954,838,000
in overseas contingency operations appropriations and $88,335,000
in disaster relief appropriations.
The Committee recommendation in this bill is $9,508,036,000
below the amount provided in fiscal year 2013 and $2,173,135,000
below the amount requested for fiscal year 2014. The Committee
recommends that $227,033,000 requested for Coast Guard activities be appropriated directly to the Department of Homeland Security.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The following table displays the recommendations for each title:
[In thousands of dollars]
Fiscal year 2013
enacted

Title I—Military personnel .............................................................
Title II—Operation and maintenance ...........................................

(5)

127,364,770
173,265,602

Fiscal year 2014
estimate

130,399,881
175,097,941

Committee
recommendation

129,133,927
178,573,167

6
[In thousands of dollars]
Fiscal year 2013
enacted

Fiscal year 2014
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Title III—Procurement ...................................................................
Title IV—Research, development, test and evaluation ................
Title V—Revolving and management funds .................................
Title VI—Other Department of Defense programs ........................
Title VII—Related agencies ...........................................................
Title VIII—General provisions (net) ...............................................
Title IV—Overseas Contingency Operations ..................................
Disaster Relief Appropriations, 2013 ............................................

100,218,282
69,836,195
2,211,102
35,479,789
1,047,716
504,341
86,954,838
88,335

98,153,503
67,520,236
2,276,527
35,461,127
1,082,271
¥913,571
80,558,154
............................

98,368,753
65,806,815
2,304,205
36,080,718
1,082,671
¥1,510,465
77,623,143
............................

Net grand total .................................................................

596,970,970

589,636,069

587,462,934

Total discretionary 1 ..........................................................

604,696,635

596,584,069

594,410,934

1 Includes

scorekeeping adjustments.

The Committee has displayed recommended adjustments in tables presented under each appropriation account.
These adjustments reflect the following Committee actions: elimination of funds requested for programs which are lower priority,
duplicative, or not supported by firm requirements in out-year development or procurement appropriations; deletion of excess funds
based on program delays or slow execution; addition of funds to reflect congressional priorities and to rectify shortfalls in the budget
estimate; and implementation of recommendations in S. 1197, the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as reported.
The Committee directs that the funding increases outlined in
these tables shall be provided only for the specific purposes indicated in the table.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAM ADJUSTMENTS

The Committee recommends adjustments to certain classified
programs, as explained in the classified annex to the Committee’s
report.
DEFINITION

PROGRAM, PROJECT

AND

ACTIVITY

In fiscal year 2014, for purposes of the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–177), as
amended, the term ‘‘program, project and activity’’ for appropriations contained in this act shall be defined as the most specific
level of budget items identified in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 and the P–1 and R–1 budget justification
documents as subsequently modified by congressional action. The
following exception to the above definition shall apply: for the military personnel and operation and maintenance accounts the term
‘‘program, project and activity’’ is defined as the appropriations accounts contained in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.
In carrying out any Presidential sequestration, the Department
of Defense and agencies shall conform to the definition for ‘‘program, project and activity’’ set forth above.

7
COMMITTEE INITIATIVES
The Committee has included funding above the President’s budget request for several programmatic initiatives which the Committee believes are of inherent value for national defense. In several cases, funds are restored for programs which were included in
previous Department of Defense budget requests, and several are
for programs that the Committee believes are necessary to improve
defense even though they have not been included under the request
formulated by the Department of Defense. For instance, the Committee provides additional research funding in the following areas:
alternative energy, unexploded ordnance and landmine detection,
nanotechnology, advanced metals and materials, military burn
treatment, and traumatic brain injury and psychological health.
The Committee believes additional research funding is warranted
in these and other areas to ensure that the Department of Defense
continues to pursue technological advances that are critical to our
national defense. The Committee has also provided funding for programs that are chronically underfunded, such as range conservation. The Committee directs that funds for these initiatives are to
be competitively awarded or provided to programs that have received competitive awards in the past.
F–35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

On June 19, 2013, the Committee held its first dedicated hearing
on the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter [JSF]. While the program is making progress in the development and test of the aircraft, significant
challenges remain. Therefore, the Committee recommends the following adjustments to the fiscal year 2014 budget request to ensure that the program stays focused on reducing risk in the development and test phase, remains on a positive trend of reducing
concurrency costs, and is affordable for both U.S. and allied purchase now and into the future.
The Department’s fiscal year 2014 request maintains production
of F–35 aircraft at 29 aircraft, consistent with 2013 levels, but increases advance procurement of 2015 aircraft by 13, to a total of
42 aircraft. This would be a 45-percent increase in production when
the F–35 program continues to experience considerable challenges
with software development, system reliability, and maintenance
system development. Given the scope of issues that must be addressed in this phase of the program, a large increase in the production of aircraft is not yet warranted. However, the Committee
acknowledges the positive trends in the program and understands
the need to increase production rates to bring down unit cost.
Therefore, the Committee recommends an increase in fiscal year
2014 advance procurement of seven aircraft for the Air Force variant for a total of 26 aircraft, a reduction in advance procurement
of four aircraft and $48,000,000. In addition, the Committee does
not recommend increased advance procurement for the Navy F–35
variant since it remains behind the other two variants in testing,
a reduction of two aircraft and $31,500,000. This recommendation
provides a 24-percent increase in F–35 production from fiscal year
2014 to fiscal year 2015, or an increase of seven aircraft.

8
The budget request includes $32,000,000 to start the follow-on
development program. The Committee believes it is too early to
start new efforts when the current development program still has
challenges and, therefore, recommends a $20,000,000 reduction.
The remaining funds should be used to complete the analysis and
staffing necessary to finalize the F–35 follow-on development capabilities development document that should be approved by the
Joint Requirements Oversight Council [JROC] during fiscal year
2014. Furthermore, the Committee notes that the F–35 draft schedule for follow-on Block 4 capabilities would span over 6 years,
would be concurrent with the ongoing F–35 development efforts,
and is projected to cost $3,800,000,000. Given the current fiscal environment and the anticipated ramp-up of F–35 production during
this same time period, the Committee believes Block 4, as currently
planned, is unaffordable. Understanding that the F–35 international partners are interested in getting their specific weapons
integrated onto the aircraft and will fund the requisite work, the
Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense and the JROC to
place priority on integrating these weapons onto the F–35 during
Block 4 follow-on development.
In addition, the Department requests $10,000,000 to assess B61
nuclear bomb integration onto the F–35. The Committee understands the Department is currently planning that the B61 capability will deliver as part of Block 4, but the JROC has not approved the capability content of Block 4. Therefore, the Committee
recommends no funding for F–35 dual capable aircraft.
F–35 MANAGEMENT

The Committee supports the Department’s decision to modify the
F–35 management charter and specify that the Program Executive
Officer [PEO] serves at the pleasure of the Secretary of Defense
rather than for a 2-year term. The Committee believes the F–35
program will benefit from consistent leadership that will ensure
positive programmatic changes become embedded in the F–35 culture.
CYBER MISSION FORCES

National Guard and Reserves in the Cyber National Mission
Forces.—With submission of the fiscal year 2014 budget request,
the Department of Defense—through U.S. Cyber Command and the
National Security Agency—formally submitted its proposed realignment of cyber mission forces into National Mission Teams, Combat
Mission Teams, and Cyber Protection Teams. Over the next several
years, the military services will be providing additional cyber mission forces to U.S. Cyber Command, composed of an active duty, civilian, and contractor workforce that has yet to be determined. The
Committee notes that National Guard and Reserve personnel possess unique skill sets and operate under distinct authorities that
could be utilized to meet the national cyber mission force needs.
Yet, the Department of Defense has not provided the congressional
defense committees a comprehensive analysis regarding the role
that National Guard and Reserve forces could fulfill as cyber mission forces are established, nor a cost comparison for filling cyber

9
mission forces with active versus Guard and Reserve forces, or a
mix thereof.
Therefore, the Committee directs the U.S. Cyber Command, in
conjunction with the Office of the Secretary of Defense, to provide
to the congressional defense committees no later than 60 days after
enactment of this act, a classified and unclassified report that includes:
—the current number and location of Reserve Component cyber
units, as well as skill sets provided by each of these units;
—the number of individual teams, their composition by number
of personnel, and missions each of the services are establishing
for U.S. Cyber Command;
—the skill sets required to meet cyber mission team requirements;
—a cost-benefit-analysis of meeting these requirements with
teams comprised of solely active duty personnel, compared to
teams partially or fully filled with National Guard or Reserve
personnel; and
—an analysis of cyber missions that are being considered for the
National Guard and/or Reserves.
Training of Cyber National Mission Forces.—The expansion of
cyber mission forces requires extensive training of personnel to
meet the needs identified by U.S. Cyber Command. Each of the
services provides personnel with different skill sets and knowledge
levels, and therefore generate different training requirements.
Therefore, the Committee directs the U.S. Cyber Command, in conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, to provide to the congressional defense committees, no later than 90 days after enactment
of this act, a classified and unclassified report that includes:
—an identification and analysis of training requirements necessary to meet U.S. Cyber Command cyber mission personnel
initial and full operational capability;
—a roadmap of training to be provided to active duty and Guard
and Reserve personnel to meet those requirements;
—cost estimates by service and mission team to meet training requirements for each cyber mission team; and
—an estimated timeline to complete the training required to
reach full operational capability of the cyber mission teams, as
proposed in the fiscal year 2014 budget.
Further, the Committee notes the limitations in existing training
resources to meet cyber mission force training requirements in the
near-term. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the military
services analyze existing training opportunities and infrastructure,
taking into account existing facilities and pre-existing synergies
with the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community when
establishing their training programs. The Committee directs U.S.
Cyber Command to provide to the congressional defense committees, no later than 90 days after enactment of this act, an analysis
of U.S. Government cyber mission force training infrastructure.
Army Cyber Forces Footprint.—Army cyber forces are currently
dispersed throughout the continental United States, with key elements co-located with U.S. Cyber Command, and other service
cyber components, which allows for significant synergies and operational efficiencies. The Committee understands that the Army is

10
currently reviewing its cyber forces footprint. Following conversations with Army leadership, the Committee understands that these
discussions are preliminary, and that no funds are included in the
fiscal year 2014 budget request to modify or move the Army’s cyber
missions. The Committee directs the Army to brief the congressional defense committees on any proposed adjustments to the
Army’s cyber footprint, to include the associated training, infrastructure and sustainment costs.
SHIP MODERNIZATION, OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT FUND

With the fiscal year 2014 budget submission, the Navy again proposes to prematurely retire seven Ticonderoga-class guided missile
cruisers and two amphibious dock landing ships that have a combined remaining service life of over 100 years. The Committee
notes that this proposal was rejected by the Congress in the Fiscal
Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act and the Fiscal Year
2013 Department of Defense Appropriations Act; and that Congress
provided significant funds to man, operate, sustain and modernize
these ships. As previously expressed in Senate Report 112–196, the
Committee is concerned with this proposed elimination of force
structure and believes it is disconnected from the strategic shift to
the Asia-Pacific, creates future unaffordable shipbuilding requirements, and exacerbates force structure shortfalls that negatively
impact the Department’s ability to meet Combatant Command requirements.
The Committee notes that some key assumptions that led the
Navy to propose prematurely retiring these ships have changed.
This includes the material condition of at least one ship being superior to what the Navy assumed, as well as the scope and cost of
modernization efforts required for these platforms to maintain
their operational relevance for the balance of their service lives.
The Committee believes that further adjustments to projected modernization efforts could be made, resulting in cost savings while retaining valuable operational capability in the near-term.
Therefore, the Committee again recommends denying these proposed premature retirements and retaining this force structure in
its entirety. The Committee recommends $2,422,400,000, to man,
operate, sustain, upgrade and modernize only CG–63, CG–64, CG–
65, CG–66, CG–68, CG–69, CG–73, LSD–41 and LSD–46 in the
Ship Modernization, Operations and Sustainment Fund, as specified elsewhere in this act. Recognizing the time required to plan
and execute shipyard availabilities and modernization periods, the
Committee makes these funds available until September 30, 2021.
However, the Committee also believes that upgrades to these ships
have been delayed for too long, and therefore directs the Secretary
of the Navy to upgrade at least one of the above listed Ticonderogaclass cruisers starting in fiscal year 2014. The Committee believes
that this recommendation provides the fiscal relief required by the
Navy to maintain this critical force structure and allows the Navy
sufficient time to budget for this force structure in future budget
submissions.

11
PATRIOT MODERNIZATION

The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $70,053,000 in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army and $256,438,000
in Missile Procurement, Army for modernization of the Patriot air
missile defense system. The Committee notes and continues its
support for modernization of the aging Patriot system; however, the
Committee remains concerned with the Army acquisition and funding strategies for this program. First, the Committee notes that
while the Army recently updated its decades-old requirements document, the new requirements document is so vague that it precludes a detailed understanding of specific technologies required,
development and fielding schedules, and costs of the overall effort.
The Committee further notes that the current modernization spiral
is slated to cost close to $2,000,000,000 over the next 5 years, with
an additional $800,000,000 required thereafter. The scope and cost
of additional spirals are still to be determined, but the Committee
notes that the current spiral’s costs are significant, and that when
combined with the costs of future spirals the total modernization
program would likely breach thresholds for what ordinarily would
be an Acquisition Category I program. Therefore, the Committee is
concerned that the Army plans to sole-source most of its modernization program and bypass full and open competition, which
has repeatedly shown to reduce costs. Finally, the Committee notes
that contrary to previously stated intentions from Army leaders,
the Army does not have a funded plan to harvest developed technologies from programs previously terminated by the Army for use
in the Patriot Modernization program, such as the Surface
Launched Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile
[SLAMRAAM], the Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System [JLENS] and the Medium Extended
Air Defense System [MEADS], which were terminated after a combined investment of approximately $6,000,000,000. Therefore, the
Committee does not recommend full support for the Army’s request. However, recognizing the urgent need to address current capability gaps, the Committee recommends $231,916,000 for Patriot
modernization, including $202,716,000 in Missile Procurement,
Army for the procurement of 22 radar digital processors, an increase of 17 units over 2013. The Committee directs that not more
than 50 percent of research and development funds for Patriot
modernization may be obligated until 30 days after the Secretary
of the Army provides to the congressional defense committees a
plan that establishes an open system software architecture for future upgrades and technology refresh to the Patriot system in the
near-term. Further, the Committee directs the Secretary of the
Army, in conjunction with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, to provide with the fiscal year
2015 budget submission an acquisition strategy that incorporates
full and open competition for Patriot modernization in the near-,
mid-, and long-term.
EXPANSION OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS

The Committee supports a proposal from the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff that would reduce general and flag officers

12
along with the accompanying support services. The U.S. military is
30 percent smaller now than at the end of the Cold War, yet has
20 percent more three- and four-star officers. The Committee is
concerned about the costs of general and flag officers as the size
of the military forces decreases. The Committee reduces the appropriation for general and flag officer operation and maintenance and
military personnel accounts by $8,000,000, and supports General
Dempsey’s plan to reduce the Department by 144 general and flag
officers over the next 5 years. To better understand the costs of
senior military officers, the Committee directs the Comptroller
General to provide a report to the congressional defense committees. The report shall include all direct and support costs associated with general and flag officers to include basic pay, basic allowance for subsistence, basic allowance for housing, travel and per
diem costs. The report shall also include the direct costs of all officers and enlisted aides assigned to or supporting general or flag officers; the travel and per diem costs of such aides, the annual expenditures for military housing provided to general and flag officers and executive healthcare. The Committee addresses this issue
in section 8069 of this act.
SUICIDE PREVENTION

The Committee applauds the efforts of the Department regarding
suicide prevention but shares the concern of the Secretary of Defense that more can and should be done to address this tragic situation. Therefore, the Committee adds $10,000,000 for the Office of
Suicide Prevention and encourages the Department to consider
funding community-based initiatives to include efforts that will assist Reserve Component Forces and their families after the transitional healthcare period has ended, as authorized by section 706 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.
SEXUAL ASSAULT

The Committee remains extremely concerned with the level of
sexual assault in the military. The most recent report from the Department found cases of reported sexual assaults increased 6 percent in 2012. Additionally, multiple reports have surfaced since the
beginning of the year of military officials in roles designated to prevent and respond to sexual assault committing these very offenses
themselves. This is simply unacceptable. The Committee supports
the Department initiative to rescreen and retrain recruiters and
sexual assault prevention officers but believes more needs to be
done to create a culture throughout the military in which sexual
assault is not tolerated.
The Committee also believes that victims of sexual assault
should not be subjected to further alienation during the investigation and prosecution of their case. In January 2013, the Air Force
began a Special Victims’ Counsel pilot program that provides victims with a trained military lawyer to provide legal assistance and
support as a case makes its way through the often arduous criminal justice process. The Committee commends the Air Force on this
program and sees it as a positive step in giving victims the voice
and support they deserve. Therefore, the Committee recommends
$25,000,000 for the Department to implement the Special Victims’

13
Counsel program across all the services, consistent with the recommendation in S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014, as reported.
OPERATIONAL RESERVE

The Committee recognizes the capability and commitment to deploy shown by the Guard and Reserve components over the past 12
years of war and applauds their transition from a strategic to an
operational reserve. As the Department continues to face budgetary
constraints and force structure reductions, the Committee believes
the value of the Guard and Reserve must be taken into account
when determining the appropriate mix between the Active and Reserve components. The Committee encourages the Department to
capitalize on the investments made in the Guard and Reserve and
appropriately plan and budget for the utilization of the operational
reserve through U.S. Code title 10, section 12304b Selected Reserve: order to active duty for preplanned missions in support of
combatant commands.
COMMISSION ON MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMY SUPERINTENDENTS

The Committee acknowledges that the military is undergoing a
period of significant change. It is facing the end of two wars, the
eligibility of women to serve in combat roles, and the repeal of
Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. The military is also facing significant obstacles presented by high rates of suicide and sexual assaults. The Superintendents at the Military Service Academies play an important
role in training future military leaders who will be critical to addressing these and other challenges. The Committee believes that
identifying criteria for Service Academy Superintendent selection
and evaluation should be a priority within the Department of Defense.
The Committee includes a provision that would create a Commission to conduct a comprehensive analysis on the role of a modern
military Service Academy Superintendent, including the criteria for
selecting and evaluating the performance of a Superintendent. The
Commission would be temporary and advisory.
The Commission shall be made up of seven members appointed
by the Secretary of Defense. In carrying out its duties, the Commission shall examine:
What is the role of a Superintendent?
What are the criteria for selecting a Superintendent?
What are the criteria for evaluating the performance of a Superintendent?
What is necessary to ensure that the military can cultivate effective Superintendents?
What role does diversity play in the selection of a Superintendent?
What is the ability of Superintendents to adapt and respond to
the changes in the military?
To what extent is the nature of the work of a Superintendent
changing, and what skills are needed to adapt to an evolving leadership role?

14
The Commission is required to produce a report not later than
6 months after the enactment of this act and shall be terminated
90 days after the issuance of this report.
ENGAGEMENT ON ARCTIC ISSUES

The Committee notes that the physical changes in the Arctic are
unprecedented in both their rate and scope of change. In addition
to the economic and social concerns, numerous studies, including
the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review and the U.S. Navy Arctic
Roadmap, have documented the significant impact that a rapidly
changing Arctic has on National Security, to include an increasing
number of vessels expected to be operating in the Arctic Ocean in
the summer and fall months.
The Arctic Council has grown significantly in recent years with
increased influence, visibility, and membership. As of May 2013,
China, Japan, Singapore, India, The Republic of Korea and Italy
have been granted observer status. In 2015, the U.S. will assume
its 2-year Chair of the Arctic Council, succeeding Canada in this
role. In view of the increasing significance and importance of the
Arctic Council, and the United States’ upcoming leadership in this
body, the Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to continue to
examine ways the Department can support engagement on Arctic
issues, including funding for better Arctic Domain Awareness, mapping the U.S. Arctic waters, and enhanced observations and prediction of Arctic weather, ocean, and ice conditions.
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY REPORTS

The Committee directs the National Security Agency [NSA] to
provide to the congressional intelligence committees, and the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and the House Committee on the
Judiciary, no later than 90 days after enactment of this act:
—A report, unclassified to the greatest extent possible, setting
forth:
—For the last 5 years, on an annual basis, the number of
records acquired by NSA as part of the bulk telephone
metadata program authorized by the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court, pursuant to section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, and the number of such records that have been
reviewed by NSA personnel in response to a query of such
records;
—To the extent possible, an estimate of the number of records
of United States persons that have been acquired by NSA as
part of the bulk telephone metadata program and the number of such records that have been reviewed by NSA personnel in response to a query.
—A report, unclassified to the greatest extent possible, and with
a classified annex if necessary, describing all NSA bulk collection activities, including when such activities began, the cost of
such activities, what types of records have been collected in the
past, what types of records are currently being collected, and
any plans for future bulk collection.
—A report, unclassified to the greatest extent possible, and with
a classified annex if necessary, including a list of terrorist activities that were disrupted, in whole or in part, with the aid

15
of information obtained through NSA’s telephone metadata
program and whether this information could have been
promptly obtained by other means.
PRESERVATION OF MILITARY HISTORY

The Committee recognizes the importance of preserving military
history, especially that which is related to U.S. campaigns on foreign soil. Military history and education facilities are integral to
the preservation of the national history of the United States and
are a direct reminder of the service and sacrifices made by members of the military services, the Coast Guard, Merchant Marines,
and their families. The Committee encourages the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries and Chiefs of each military Department
to examine these national assets to ensure the Nation’s continued
commitment to the preservation of military history.

TITLE I
MILITARY PERSONNEL
Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required for basic pay, retired pay accrual, employers’ contribution
for Social Security taxes, basic allowance for subsistence, basic allowance for housing, special and incentive pays, permanent change
of station travel, and other personnel costs for uniformed members
of the Armed Forces.
The President’s fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$130,399,881,000 for military personnel appropriations. This request funds an Active component end strength of 1,361,400 and a
Reserve component end strength of 833,700.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends military personnel appropriations
totaling $129,133,927,000 for fiscal year 2014. This is
$1,265,954,000 below the budget estimate.
Committee recommended military personnel appropriations for
fiscal year 2014 are summarized below:
SUMMARY OF MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Account

Military Personnel:
Military Personnel, Army ...................................................................
Military Personnel, Navy ...................................................................
Military Personnel, Marine Corps ......................................................
Military Personnel, Air Force .............................................................
Reserve Personnel:
Reserve Personnel, Army ...................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Navy ...................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps .....................................................
Reserve Personnel, Air Force ............................................................
National Guard Personnel:
National Guard Personnel, Army .......................................................
National Guard Personnel, Air Force ................................................
Total ..............................................................................................

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

41,037,790
27,824,444
12,905,216
28,519,877

40,796,005
27,606,615
12,720,114
28,252,060

¥241,785
¥217,829
¥185,102
¥267,817

4,565,261
1,891,936
677,499
1,758,629

4,430,784
1,846,795
657,841
1,719,497

¥134,477
¥45,141
¥19,658
¥39,132

8,041,268
3,177,961

7,959,072
3,145,144

¥82,196
¥32,817

130,399,881

129,133,927

¥1,265,954

Committee recommended end strengths for fiscal year 2014 are
summarized below:
RECOMMENDED END STRENGTH
Item

Active:
Army .....................................................
Navy .....................................................

2013
authorization

552,100
322,700

(16)

2014 budget
estimate

520,000
323,600

Committee
recommendation

520,000
323,600

Change from
budget estimate

............................
............................

17
RECOMMENDED END STRENGTH—Continued
2013
authorization

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Marine Corps .......................................
Air Force ...............................................

197,300
329,460

190,200
327,600

............................
............................

Subtotal ...........................................

1,401,560

1,361,400

............................

Selected Reserve:
Army Reserve .......................................
Navy Reserve .......................................
Marine Corps Reserve ..........................
Air Force Reserve .................................
Army National Guard ...........................
Air National Guard ...............................

205,000
62,500
39,600
70,880
358,200
105,700

205,000
59,100
39,600
70,400
354,200
105,400

............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................

Subtotal ...........................................

841,880

833,700

............................

TOTAL ...............................................

2,243,440

2,195,100

............................

Committee recommended end strengths for full-time support of
the Reserve and Guard for fiscal year 2014 are summarized below:
RECOMMENDED ACTIVE GUARD AND RESERVE END STRENGTH
2013
authorization

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Active Guard and Reserve:
Army Reserve .......................................
Navy Reserve .......................................
Marine Corps Reserve ..........................
Air Force Reserve .................................
Army National Guard ...........................
Air National Guard ...............................

16,277
10,114
2,261
2,888
32,060
14,765

16,261
10,159
2,261
2,911
32,060
14,734

............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................

TOTAL ...............................................

78,365

78,386

............................

MILITARY PERSONNEL OVERVIEW
Reserve Component Budget Reporting.—The Committee continues
its requirement for the Department to provide a semi-annual detailed report to the congressional defense committees showing
transfers between subactivities within the military personnel appropriation. Reports shall be submitted not later than 30 days following the end of the second quarter and 30 days following the end
of the fiscal year.
Permanent Change of Station [PCS].—The Committee notes that
the services expect to underexecute their PCS budgets by more
than $124,000,000 in fiscal year 2013 due to lower average costs
per move and fewer overall moves than budgeted. This underexecution comes on top of the $146,792,500 reduction to PCS budgets in
the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013.
While the Committee awaits the report required by that bill from
the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) on potential efficiencies in the PCS program, it believes savings can be
realized in the fiscal year 2014 PCS program and recommends a
total reduction of $294,265,000 across the services’ operational and
rotational base budgets. The Committee supports the services’ in-

18
creased time on station goals and encourages them to continue
working to meet these established goals.
Unobligated Balances.—A Government Accountability Office
analysis of past year obligation rates shows that the services continue to underexecute their military personnel accounts. Due to excess unobligated balances, the Committee recommends a total reduction of $491,239,000 from the fiscal year 2014 military personnel accounts.
Enlistment of DACA Recipients.—The Committee is concerned
that immigrants who have received Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals [DACA] are not authorized to enlist in the Armed Forces,
which has a negative impact on military recruitment and readiness. Under 10 U.S.C. section 504, Service Secretaries can authorize the enlistment of non-citizens when it is ‘‘vital to the national
interest.’’ Enlisting DACA recipients would allow the Armed Forces
to access an expanded pool of recruits. To be eligible for DACA, an
individual must have entered the United States as a child; graduated from secondary school, obtained a general equivalency degree, or be currently enrolled in school; and not have a serious
criminal record. DACA recipients are, by definition, educated and
integrated into American society, and many have shown an interest
in and aptitude for military service through participation in Junior
Reserve Officers’ Training Corps [JROTC]. The requirements to
qualify for DACA are similar to those for legislation known as the
DREAM [Development Relief and Education of Alien Minors] Act.
In 2011, Dr. Clifford Stanley, then-Undersecretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness, testified in support of the DREAM Act,
noting it would allow the Department of Defense ‘‘to expand the
market of high-quality youth to the advantage of military recruitment and readiness.’’ In 2010, then-Secretary of Defense Robert
Gates said the DREAM Act ‘‘will result in improved recruitment results and attendant gains in unit manning and military performance.’’ Accordingly, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense,
no later than 90 days after enactment of this act, to provide an unclassified report to the congressional defense committees on the
feasibility and impact on military recruitment and readiness of authorizing the enlistment of DACA recipients.
Accession of Officers With Auditory Impairments.—The Committee directs the Department of the Air Force to study the feasibility and advisability of permitting individuals with auditory impairments, including deafness, to access as officers in the Armed
Forces.
MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY
2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $40,146,213,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 41,037,790,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 40,796,005,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $40,796,005,000.
This is $241,785,000 below the budget estimate.

19
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY
5
10
25
30
35
40
45
50
55

ACTIVITY 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
BASIC PAY .....................................................................................
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL ................................................................
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING ................................................
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE .........................................
INCENTIVE PAYS ............................................................................
SPECIAL PAYS ...............................................................................
ALLOWANCES .................................................................................
SEPARATION PAY ...........................................................................
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ..................................................................

6,751,445
2,182,873
2,110,476
281,099
89,669
374,353
225,840
107,216
513,274

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

12,636,245

........................

60
65
80
85
90
95
100
105

ACTIVITY 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC PAY .....................................................................................
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL ................................................................
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING ................................................
INCENTIVE PAYS ............................................................................
SPECIAL PAYS ...............................................................................
ALLOWANCES .................................................................................
SEPARATION PAY ...........................................................................
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ..................................................................

12,761,868
4,130,751
4,653,429
95,637
507,912
915,101
287,133
976,224

12,714,118
4,130,751
4,653,429
95,637
469,912
915,101
287,133
976,224

¥47,750
........................
........................
........................
¥38,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 .............................................

24,328,055

24,242,305

¥85,750

110

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS
ACADEMY CADETS .........................................................................

77,959

........................

115
120
121

ACTIVITY 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE .........................................
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND ..................................................................
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE .....................

1,252,752
707,647
2,121

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

1,962,520

........................

125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160

ACTIVITY 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION
ACCESSION TRAVEL ......................................................................
TRAINING TRAVEL ..........................................................................
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL ...................................................................
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL .....................................................................
SEPARATION TRAVEL .....................................................................
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS ......................................................
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE ..........................................................
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE ...................................................

169,697
126,908
524,098
693,315
222,146
9,887
10,160
40,238

169,697
126,908
471,688
623,983
222,146
9,887
10,160
40,238

........................
........................
¥52,410
¥69,332
........................
........................
........................
........................

170
175
180
185
195
200
216
217

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 .............................................

1,796,449

1,674,707

¥121,742

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS ....................................
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS ............................
DEATH GRATUITIES ........................................................................
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ...........................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................
ADOPTION EXPENSES ....................................................................
RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ...............................
SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS ...................................................
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) .............................

960
725
61,900
282,863
636
4,326
326
117,559
42,407

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 .............................................

511,702

........................

20
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

LESS REIMBURSABLES ..................................................................

¥275,140

........................

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥34,293

TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, ARMY ........................................

41,037,790

40,796,005

¥241,785

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY ..............................

41,037,790

40,796,005

¥241,785

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
request

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60

12,761,868

12,714,118

¥47,750

........................
507,912

........................
469,912

¥47,750
¥38,000

........................

¥38,000

524,098
........................
693,315
........................

471,688
........................
623,983
........................

¥52,410
¥52,410
¥69,332
¥69,332

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .......

........................

¥34,293

Basic Pay ......................................................................................
Improving funds management: Lower than budgeted
strength levels ................................................................
Special Pays .................................................................................
Improving funds management: Enlistment bonuses excess
to requirement .................................................................
BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL

135
140

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... $26,866,844,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 27,824,444,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 27,606,615,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $27,606,615,000.
This is $217,829,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

3,934,736
1,273,217
1,413,796
160,319
131,293

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY
5
10
25
30
35

3,934,736
1,273,217
1,413,796
160,319
131,293

21
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

40
45
50
55

SPECIAL PAYS ...............................................................................
ALLOWANCES .................................................................................
SEPARATION PAY ...........................................................................
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ..................................................................

432,843
127,172
39,244
299,218

........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

7,811,838

........................

60
65
80
85
90
95
100
105

8,610,541
2,789,555
3,977,998
103,672
877,215
590,803
255,663
658,707

8,610,541
2,789,555
3,929,998
103,672
817,215
590,803
255,663
658,707

........................
........................
¥48,000
........................
¥60,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 .............................................

17,864,154

17,756,154

¥108,000

110

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF MIDSHIPMEN
MIDSHIPMEN .................................................................................

77,592

........................

115
120
121

764,626
439,545
12

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

1,204,183

........................

125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165

102,042
96,869
272,379
301,392
133,977
36,790
1,212
8,545
3,514

102,042
96,869
245,141
271,253
133,977
36,790
1,212
8,545
3,514

........................
........................
¥27,238
¥30,139
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 .............................................

956,720

899,343

¥57,377

170
175
180
185
195
200
210
215
217
218

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS ....................................
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS ............................
DEATH GRATUITIES ........................................................................
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ...........................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................
ADOPTION EXPENSES ....................................................................
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY ...........................................................
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE ..............................................
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) .............................
JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................................

199
1,660
17,400
124,716
18,809
210
5,750
92
21,271
14,069

199
1,660
17,400
116,716
18,809
210
5,750
92
21,271
14,069

........................
........................
........................
¥8,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 .............................................

204,176

196,176

¥8,000

LESS REIMBURSABLES ..................................................................

¥294,219

........................

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥44,452

TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, NAVY ........................................

27,824,444

27,606,615

¥217,829

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY ...............................

27,824,444

27,606,615

¥217,829

22
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

3,977,998
........................
877,215

3,929,998
........................
817,215

¥48,000
¥48,000
¥60,000

........................

¥60,000

272,379
........................
301,392
........................

245,141
........................
271,253
........................

¥27,238
¥27,238
¥30,139
¥30,139

Unemployment Benefits ................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess to requirement ......

124,716
........................

116,716
........................

¥8,000
¥8,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .......

........................

¥44,452

Line

Item

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
80
90

Basic Allowance For Housing .......................................................
Improving funds management: Excess to requirement ......
Special Pays .................................................................................
Improving funds management: Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement ........................................................
BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL

135
140

185

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... $12,515,011,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 12,905,216,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 12,720,114,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $12,720,114,000.
This is $185,102,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
5
10
25
30
35
40
45
50
55

1,458,728
472,134
479,739
61,565
40,634
12,746
43,866
16,856
110,942

1,459,828
472,134
479,739
61,565
40,634
12,746
43,866
16,856
110,942

∂1,100
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

2,697,210

2,698,310

∂1,100

60
65

4,746,121
1,533,530

4,703,321
1,533,530

¥42,800
........................

23
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

80
85
90
95
100
105

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING ................................................
INCENTIVE PAYS ............................................................................
SPECIAL PAYS ...............................................................................
ALLOWANCES .................................................................................
SEPARATION PAY ...........................................................................
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ..................................................................

1,652,636
9,832
154,862
335,728
73,213
362,126

1,652,636
9,832
125,862
335,728
73,213
362,126

........................
........................
¥29,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 .............................................

8,868,048

8,796,248

¥71,800

115
120
121

438,034
296,986
10

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

735,030

........................

125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165

57,933
23,061
209,371
101,809
93,399
784
6,888
14,918
3,312

57,933
23,061
188,434
95,128
93,399
784
6,888
14,918
3,312

........................
........................
¥20,937
¥6,681
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 .............................................

511,475

483,857

¥27,618

170
175
180
185
195
200
210
215
218

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS ....................................
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS ............................
DEATH GRATUITIES ........................................................................
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ...........................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................
ADOPTION EXPENSES ....................................................................
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY ...........................................................
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE ..............................................
JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................................

751
20
10,100
96,264
2,375
72
3,085
102
5,035

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 .............................................

117,804

........................

LESS REIMBURSABLES ..................................................................

¥24,351

........................

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥86,784

TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, MARINE CORPS ........................

12,905,216

12,720,114

¥185,102

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS ..............

12,905,216

12,720,114

¥185,102

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

1,458,728

1,459,828

∂1,100

........................

∂1,100

BA 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5

Basic Pay ......................................................................................
Marine Corps unfunded requirement: Marine Security
Guard expansion .............................................................

24
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

4,746,121
........................

4,703,321
........................

¥42,800
¥66,000

........................
154,862
........................

........................
125,862
........................

∂23,200
¥29,000
¥10,000

........................

¥19,000

209,371
........................
101,809
........................

188,434
........................
95,128
........................

¥20,937
¥20,937
¥6,681
¥10,181

........................

∂3,500

........................

¥86,784

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60

Basic Pay ......................................................................................
Improving funds management: Projected underexecution ..
Marine Corps unfunded requirement: Marine Security
Guard expansion .............................................................
Special Pays .................................................................................
Improving funds management: Projected underexecution ..
Improving funds management: Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement ........................................................
BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL

135
140

Operational Travel ........................................................................
Improving funds management: PCS efficiency ...................
Rotational Travel ..........................................................................
Improving funds management: PCS efficiency ...................
Marine Corps unfunded requirement: Marine Security
Guard expansion .............................................................
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .......

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $28,015,805,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 28,519,877,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 28,252,060,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $28,252,060,000.
This is $267,817,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
5
10
25
30
35
40
45
50
55

4,896,132
1,577,877
1,498,352
197,950
206,177
303,634
134,661
122,844
372,960

4,856,132
1,577,877
1,498,352
197,950
206,177
303,634
134,661
122,844
372,960

¥40,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

9,310,587

9,270,587

¥40,000

60
65
80
85
90
95

8,764,297
2,831,706
3,610,470
42,599
341,821
590,403

8,759,297
2,831,706
3,610,470
42,599
341,821
590,403

¥5,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

25
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

100
105

SEPARATION PAY ...........................................................................
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ..................................................................

176,663
670,467

........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 .............................................

17,028,426

17,023,426

¥5,000

110

ACTIVITY 3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS
ACADEMY CADETS .........................................................................

69,612

........................

115
120
121

977,880
156,439
33

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

1,134,352

........................

125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160

86,485
79,127
327,304
512,982
169,760
16,123
41,132
30,183

86,485
66,127
294,574
461,684
169,760
16,123
41,132
30,183

........................
¥13,000
¥32,730
¥51,298
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 5 .............................................

1,263,096

1,166,068

¥97,028

170
175
180
185
195
200
210
215
217
218

ACTIVITY 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS ....................................
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES SAVINGS ............................
DEATH GRATUITIES ........................................................................
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ...........................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................
ADOPTION EXPENSES ....................................................................
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY ...........................................................
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE ..............................................
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) .............................
JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................................

124
3,440
16,500
65,562
209
628
5,900
1,930
29,849
16,373

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 .............................................

140,515

........................

LESS REIMBURSABLES ..................................................................

¥426,711

........................

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥125,789

TOTAL, ACTIVE FORCES, AIR FORCE ...............................

28,519,877

28,252,060

¥267,817

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ......................

28,519,877

28,252,060

¥267,817

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

BA 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5

Basic Pay ..................................................................................
Improving funds management: Lower than budgeted
strength levels ............................................................

4,896,132

4,856,132

¥40,000

........................

¥40,000

8,764,297

8,759,297

¥5,000

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60

Basic Pay ..................................................................................

26
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

........................

¥5,000

Training Travel ..........................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess to requirement ..
Operational Travel ....................................................................
Improving funds management: PCS efficiency ...............
Rotational Travel ......................................................................
Improving funds management: PCS efficiency ...............

79,127
........................
327,304
........................
512,982
........................

66,127
........................
294,574
........................
461,684
........................

¥13,000
¥13,000
¥32,730
¥32,730
¥51,298
¥51,298

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances ...

........................

¥125,789

Item

Improving funds management: Active Duty for Operational Support excess to requirement .......................

Change from
budget request

BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL
130
135
140

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$4,450,941,000
4,565,261,000
4,430,784,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,430,784,000.
This is $134,477,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY
10
20
30
40
60
70
80
90
100
120
130

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) ..................
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) ..............
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) ............................................
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) ............................
MOBILIZATION TRAINING ...............................................................
SCHOOL TRAINING .........................................................................
SPECIAL TRAINING ........................................................................
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ...................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP .............................................
OTHER PROGRAMS ........................................................................

1,578,274
39,508
276,721
13,225
7,629
206,138
261,954
2,034,705
22,687
63,459
60,961

1,558,274
39,508
265,221
13,225
7,629
206,138
261,954
2,034,705
22,687
63,459
60,961

¥20,000
........................
¥11,500
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

4,565,261

4,533,761

¥31,500

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥102,977

TOTAL RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY ...............................

4,565,261

4,430,784

¥134,477

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:

27
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
10

Pay Group A Training (15 Days & Drills 24/48) ......................
Improving funds management: Lower than budgeted
strength levels ............................................................
Pay Group F Training (Recruits) ...............................................
Improving funds management: Projected underexecution

1,578,274

1,558,274

¥20,000

........................
276,721
........................

........................
265,221
........................

¥20,000
¥11,500
¥11,500

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances ...

........................

¥102,977

RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY
2013 1

Appropriations,
...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$1,871,550,000
1,891,936,000
1,846,795,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,846,795,000.
This is $45,141,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

602,319
9,489
50,501
8,986
55,326
101,870
1,006,454
104
56,887

602,319
9,489
50,501
8,986
50,726
89,470
1,002,454
104
56,887

........................
........................
........................
........................
¥4,600
¥12,400
¥4,000
........................
........................

RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY
10
20
30
60
70
80
90
100
120

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) ..................
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) ..............
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) ............................................
MOBILIZATION TRAINING ...............................................................
SCHOOL TRAINING .........................................................................
SPECIAL TRAINING ........................................................................
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ...................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP .............................................
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

1,891,936

1,870,936

¥21,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥24,141

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY ...............................

1,891,936

1,846,795

¥45,141

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

50,726

¥4,600

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
70

School Training .............................................................................

55,326

28
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

Improving funds management: Unit conversion training
excess to requirement .....................................................
Special Training ............................................................................
Improving funds management: Active Duty special training excess to requirement ..............................................
Administration and Support .........................................................
Improving funds management: Full-time support bonuses
excess to requirement .....................................................
Improving funds management: Officer retention bonuses
excess to requirement .....................................................
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .......

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

........................
101,870

........................
89,470

¥4,600
¥12,400

........................
1,006,454

........................
1,002,454

¥12,400
¥4,000

........................

¥1,000

........................

¥3,000

........................

¥24,141

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$657,382,000
677,499,000
657,841,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $657,841,000.
This is $19,658,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

233,722
30,555
135,088
3,677
19,448
18,968
217,453
7,770
818

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥10,000
........................
........................

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
10
20
30
60
70
80
90
95
100

ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) ..................
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) ..............
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) ............................................
MOBILIZATION TRAINING ...............................................................
SCHOOL TRAINING .........................................................................
SPECIAL TRAINING ........................................................................
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ...................................................
PLATOON LEADER CLASS ..............................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................

233,722
30,555
135,088
3,677
19,448
18,968
227,453
7,770
818

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

677,499

667,499

¥10,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥9,658

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS ..............

677,499

657,841

¥19,658

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:

29
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
90

Administration And Support .........................................................
Improving funds management: Full-time pay and allowances projected underexecution ......................................

227,453

217,453

¥10,000

........................

¥10,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .......

........................

¥9,658

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
2013 1

$1,720,152,000
1,758,629,000
1,719,497,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,719,497,000.
This is $39,132,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

672,181
104,818
73,281
755
568
149,078
295,335
388,973
13,507
55,220
4,913

664,181
100,068
73,281
755
568
149,078
295,335
374,973
13,507
55,220
4,913

¥8,000
¥4,750
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥14,000
........................
........................
........................

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) ..................
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR ACTIVE DUTY) ..............
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) ............................................
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) ............................
MOBILIZATION TRAINING ...............................................................
SCHOOL TRAINING .........................................................................
SPECIAL TRAINING ........................................................................
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ...................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP .............................................
OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMIN & SUPPORT) ......................................

10
20
30
40
60
70
80
90
100
120
130

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

1,758,629

1,731,879

¥26,750

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥12,382

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ......................

1,758,629

1,719,497

¥39,132

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
10

Pay Group A Training (15 Days & Drills 24/48) ......................
Improving funds management: Lower than budgeted
officer strength ...........................................................

672,181

664,181

¥8,000

........................

¥8,000

30
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Pay Group B Training (Backfill for Active Duty) ......................
Improving funds management: Lower than budgeted
strength levels ............................................................
Administration and Support .....................................................
Improving funds management: Reserve incentive program excess to requirement .......................................
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances ...

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

104,818

100,068

¥4,750

........................
388,973

........................
374,973

¥4,750
¥14,000

........................

¥14,000

........................

¥12,382

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$7,971,044,000
8,041,268,000
7,959,072,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,959,072,000.
This is $82,196,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

2,400,466
557,753
35,718
576,399
665,242
3,779,017
26,673

2,392,466
540,503
35,718
576,399
665,242
3,758,017
26,673

¥8,000
¥17,250
........................
........................
........................
¥21,000
........................

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY
ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) ..................
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) ............................................
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) ............................
SCHOOL TRAINING .........................................................................
SPECIAL TRAINING ........................................................................
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ...................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................

10
30
40
70
80
90
100

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

8,041,268

7,995,018

¥46,250

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥35,946

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY .................

8,041,268

7,959,072

¥82,196

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

BA1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
10

2,400,466

2,392,466

¥8,000

........................
557,753

........................
540,503

¥8,000
¥17,250

31
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

Improving funds management: Lower than budgeted
strength levels ............................................................
Administration and Support .....................................................
Improving funds management: Enlistment bonuses initial payments excess to requirement .........................

........................
3,779,017

........................
3,758,017

¥17,250
¥21,000

........................

¥21,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances ...

........................

¥35,946

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$3,149,828,000
3,177,961,000
3,145,144,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,145,144,000.
This is $32,817,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

943,573
111,468
5,006
250,327
165,588
1,684,563
17,436

925,573
111,468
5,006
250,327
165,588
1,684,563
17,436

¥18,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
ACTIVITY 1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS & DRILLS 24/48) ..................
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS) ............................................
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE RECRUITS) ............................
SCHOOL TRAINING .........................................................................
SPECIAL TRAINING ........................................................................
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ...................................................
EDUCATION BENEFITS ...................................................................

10
30
40
70
80
90
100

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

3,177,961

3,159,961

¥18,000

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT .......................................................

........................

¥14,817

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ........

3,177,961

3,145,144

¥32,817

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
10

Pay Group A Training (15 Days & Drills 24/48) ................
Improving funds management: Travel active duty
for training projected underexecution ...................

943,573

925,573

¥18,000

..........................

¥18,000

32
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .....................................................................

..........................

Committee
recommendation

¥14,817

Change from
budget request

¥14,817

TITLE II
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required to prepare for and conduct combat operations and other
peace time missions. These funds are used to purchase fuel and
spare parts for training operations, pay supporting civilian personnel, and purchase supplies, equipment, and service contracts for
the repair of weapons and facilities.
The President’s fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$175,097,941,000 for operation and maintenance appropriations.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends operation and maintenance appropriations totaling $178,573,167,000 for fiscal year 2014. This is
$3,475,226,000 above the budget estimate.
Committee recommended operation and maintenance appropriations for fiscal year 2014 are summarized below:
SUMMARY OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Account

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance, Army ...................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Navy ...................................................
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ......................................
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force .............................................
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide .....................................
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve .....................................
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve ......................................
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ........................
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve ...............................
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard .........................
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard .............................
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ....................
Environmental Restoration, Army .....................................................
Environmental Restoration, Navy ......................................................
Environmental Restoration, Air Force ...............................................
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide ........................................
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites ...............
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid .............................
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account .............................................
OCOTF ................................................................................................
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund ..

35,073,077
39,945,237
6,254,650
37,270,842
32,997,693
3,095,036
1,197,752
263,317
3,164,607
7,054,196
6,566,004
13,606
298,815
316,103
439,820
10,757
237,443
109,500
528,455
5,000
256,031

36,938,580
41,613,205
6,359,736
37,626,333
32,597,068
3,096,436
1,208,552
261,317
3,148,307
7,082,599
6,505,204
13,606
298,815
316,103
439,820
10,757
287,443
109,500
528,455
........................
131,331

∂1,865,503
∂1,667,968
∂105,086
∂355,491
¥400,625
∂1,400
∂10,800
¥2,000
¥16,300
∂28,403
¥60,800
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂50,000
........................
........................
¥5,000
¥124,700

Total ..............................................................................................

175,097,941

178,573,167

∂3,475,226

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW

Civilian Workforce.—The civilian workforce has faced many challenges over the past several years. The last pay raise was in 2010.
(33)

34
In 2013, the Department took specific action to release temporary
employees, freeze hiring, and furlough most of its civilian workforce
due to sequestration. The Committee recognizes the critical role
that the civilian workforce plays every day in ensuring the mission
success of the Armed Forces. The Committee is increasingly concerned over the impact of these challenges on the Department’s
ability to maintain a stable, effective, right-sized civilian cadre.
Therefore, the Committee fully funds the 1 percent pay raise for civilian employees as requested.
Overestimation of Civilian Workforce.—While the Committee supports a strong civilian workforce, the fiscal year 2014 budget request substantially overestimates the number of civilians that will
be employed during fiscal year 2014. Through analysis directed by
the Committee during the budget review, each service and defense
agency identified the current estimate for civilian full time equivalents [FTE] that will be on the books in fiscal year 2013 and it is
far short of what was planned for in the budget request. The results showed that the total difference between the planned fiscal
year 2013 FTE level and the current estimate is approximately
11,660 FTE. That means that at the beginning of fiscal year 2014
the Department of Defense will have 11,660 fewer FTE than the
planned starting number. Considering that the fully-burdened average salary of Department of Defense civilians is approximately
$100,000 that could mean an overstatement of about
$1,200,000,000 in the operation and maintenance accounts based
on the overestimation of civilian FTE levels at the beginning of fiscal year 2014. The Committee recommendation includes an overestimation reduction.
Voluntary Military Education Programs—Tracking Outcomes.—
The Committee is concerned about the lack of information available
on the outcomes of students receiving Tuition Assistance and My
Career Advancement Account [MyCAA] benefits. Therefore, the
Committee directs the Department to submit a report tracking
such outcomes of each of these programs. The report shall be submitted on or before June 1, 2014, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following data totals for calendar year 2013: an aggregate graduation rate, loan default rate, and average indebtedness.
Additionally, the report shall then disaggregate the data to show
these same metrics by sector: public, private for-profit, and private
not-for-profit. Finally, the report shall include the percentage of
servicemembers utilizing the Top-Up program for voluntary military education and the average dollar amount of usage. Additionally, the Department is encouraged to make an effort to gather
data on the jobs attained after graduation, specifically whether
those jobs can be reasonably said to be in the field of study identified in the students’ education plans.
Voluntary Military Education Programs—Education Service Officers and Third Party Audits.—The Committee recognizes the importance of voluntary military education programs to the continued
education of our men and women in uniform and their spouses. In
recent years, the programs have grown in popularity among
servicemembers and, as such, in cost to the Federal Government.
The Committee notes recent efforts to improve oversight; however,
questions remain as to the effectiveness of these efforts.

35
The Committee is concerned that the ratio of Education Service
Officers [ESOs] to servicemembers is not optimized to provide the
level of support required to properly advise servicemembers about
educational opportunities and the financial obligations tied to
them. The Committee is also concerned about the number and
transparency of third party audits of schools within the Department’s Tuition Assistance program. The Committee encourages the
Department to further analyze the ratio of ESOs to
servicemembers and the number and transparency of third party
audits to make improvements during fiscal year 2014.
In order to better inform future requests, the Committee directs
the Government Accountability Office [GAO] to provide a report to
the congressional defense committees making recommendations on
the issues of ESO ratios and third party audits within 90 days of
the date of enactment of this act. Within the analysis, the Committee suggests the GAO review counseling service ratios in educational support programs across the Government to measure the
Department of Defense’s efforts against those of similar programs.
Also, the GAO shall review the current third party audits of
schools within the Tuition Assistance program and provide recommendations for improvements to the audit process, if warranted,
and shall provide examples of organizations with the expertise to
conduct such reviews.
Extremity Protection Program.—The Committee encourages the
Department of Defense to fully fund the Cold Weather Protective
Equipment—Extremity Protection Program in order to sustain research and development programs, acquisition requirements and to
maintain a basic combat capability in protective equipment for
servicemembers.
Telecommunications Expense Management.—The Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012, directed the Secretary of Defense to complete a study and assess the feasibility of using commercial off-theshelf [COTS] telecommunication expense management solutions to
improve enterprise visibility over the Department’s telecommunications expenses and identify possible efficiencies in this growing
technological area. Since that study was completed, the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer [CIO] promulgated guidance regarding the use of these management solutions. The Committee is concerned that the military services are not yet in compliance with the CIO’s guidance. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Secretary of Defense defer new large telecommunications contracts until the Department has begun to
proactively manage telecommunications usage utilizing competitively awarded COTS expense management solutions in accordance
with the CIO guidance.
Combat and Camouflage Utility Uniforms.—The Committee is
concerned about the high cost of and disparity in protection from
separate combat and camouflage utility uniforms fielded by the
military services. The Committee believes that the Secretary of Defense should take steps to end separate development and fielding
of service-specific combat and camouflage utility uniforms and
adopt and field the same combat and camouflage utility uniforms
for use by all members of the Armed Forces to the maximum extent practicable. The issue is addressed in section 8038 of this act

36
which is consistent with S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as reported.
Presidential Management Fellows Program.—The Committee is
concerned about the future of the Presidential Management Fellow
[PMF] Program in the Office of the Secretary of Defense [OSD].
The PMF Program serves as an important tool to grow young professionals as future leaders in OSD. In this time of budget uncertainty, it is essential that the Department capitalize on its investment in the next generation of leadership and plan to incorporate
them into the workforce. The Committee directs the Department to
continue to fully fund the program at the President’s budget request level and offer placement of no fewer than three new PMFs
into the program in fiscal year 2014. The Committee further directs
that successful PMFs shall be converted into full-time permanent
positions within the Office of the Secretary of Defense at the completion of the PMF program.
Reserve and Guard Access to the National Military Command
Center.—The Committee is concerned about the recent limitation in
access for Guard and Reserve personnel assigned on long-term orders to drill in the National Military Command Center (NMCC)
under Joint Staff Instruction 5241.01G. Members of the Guard and
Reserve perform critical functions to the NMCC and their presence
enables continued cost-effective operations. The Committee directs
that Guard and Reserve personnel drilling in the NMCC shall be
provided the same access as Active Duty and civilian personnel assigned to the NMCC.
Advanced Trauma Training Program for National Guard and
Reserve.—The Committee recognizes the valuable support universities, hospitals, and other military partners provide by offering civilian-based emergency response trauma training to sustain medics’ and medical providers’ capabilities of the National Guard Enhanced Response Forces Packages [CERFP], National Guard Homeland Response Forces [NGHRF], and the Army Reserve Consequence Management Response Forces [CCMRF]. The Committee
encourages the National Guard and Reserve to continue pursuing
state of the art trauma training with these civilian partners, thus
maintaining unit medical readiness postures at optimum levels as
the CERFPs, NGHRFs, and CCMRFs military healthcare providers
maintain their individual skills to respond effectively to emergency
incidents on the Homeland. Furthermore, in order to minimize the
civilian-military operational gaps, in the event of a catastrophic incident, the Committee also encourages the development of enhanced preparedness medical training programs focusing on mass
casualty triage, advanced disaster life support, advanced hazardous
material life support, emergency dental, and psychological health
by increasing civilian-based advanced trauma expertise gained
through day-to-day experiences and medical research programs.
Decontamination Lotion.—The Committee recognizes the importance of chemical warfare countermeasures that can be carried by
individual service members and packaged in individual troop kits.
In the event of a chemical attack, immediate access to decontamination measures will be critical to mitigate serious injuries
due to exposure. The Committee encourages the Department of Defense to place a high priority on current and developing decon-

37
tamination agents and fully fund annual service specific requirements.
New Strategic Arms Treaty.—The Committee is concerned about
a possible delay in announcing New Strategic Arms Treaty force
structure levels and encourages the Secretary of Defense to make
those announcements prior to submission of the Fiscal Year 2015
budget request.
Joint Prisoner of War/Missing in Action Accounting Command
[JPAC] Efforts.—Section 1509 of the Fiscal Year 2010 National Defense Authorization Act [NDAA] directed the Department of Defense to ensure that at least 200 missing persons are accounted for
under the JPAC program annually beginning in fiscal year 2015.
The Committee encourages the Department to consider partnering
with research universities with expertise in archeology and remains recovery to assist in becoming compliant with the NDAA
mandates.
Dual-Status Military Technicians.—Military technicians are civilian employees of the Department of Army or Department of the Air
Force, employed by a State Adjutant General, but they are also
members of the military because they are required to be drilling
(part-time) military members of the National Guard. These technicians provide the day-to-day continuity in the operation and training of National Guard Units. Given their dual-status role, military
technicians are required to maintain the same individual-level of
readiness as their Active component counterparts and directly contribute to unit-level readiness in support of National Guard missions. As such, the Committee encourages the Department of Defense to treat military technician pay the same as their Active component counterparts when planning for employee furloughs.
Stuart Creek 2 Wildfire.—The Stuart Creek 2 Fire, which has
burned 85,018 acres near residential areas of Fairbanks, Alaska,
began June 19, 2013, on a military training range 25 miles east of
North Pole. The Army is currently investigating whether or not the
fire was caused by live fire artillery on the Army’s Yukon Training
Range. The Committee is deeply concerned about reports that the
live fire artillery exercise was permitted to occur notwithstanding
the advice of the Bureau of Land Management’s Alaska Fire Service and the Fort Wainwright Garrison that it be postponed due to
the high potential for wildfire. Accordingly, the Committee directs
the Army to review its procedures for determining when to postpone exercises due to wildfire risk in light of the outcome of its investigation into the Stuart Creek Fire, and to report to the congressional defense committees on its conclusions no later than April 15,
2014.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, ARMY

2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $35,367,901,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 35,073,077,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 36,938,580,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.
emergency funding of $5,370,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013
(division A of Public Law 113–2).
2 Includes

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $36,938,580,000.
This is $1,865,503,000 above the budget estimate.

38
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30
40
50
60

LAND FORCES
MANEUVER UNITS .........................................................................
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .....................................................
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES .......................................................
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ...............................................................
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..........................................
AVIATION ASSETS ..........................................................................

888,114
72,624
617,402
602,262
1,032,484
1,287,462

1,276,685
80,890
674,028
614,866
1,154,051
1,379,121

∂388,571
∂8,266
∂56,626
∂12,604
∂121,567
∂91,659

70
80
90

LAND FORCES READINESS
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................
LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ............................................
LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................

3,559,656
454,477
1,481,156

3,540,427
454,477
2,584,156

¥19,229
........................
∂1,103,000

100
110
120
130
170

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION .....
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS ......................
COMBATANT COMMANDER’S CORE OPERATIONS ..........................
COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS .......................

7,278,154
2,754,712
425,271
185,064
463,270

7,413,375
3,129,712
425,271
185,064
463,270

∂135,221
∂375,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

21,102,108

23,375,393

∂2,273,285

MOBILITY OPERATIONS
STRATEGIC MOBILITY ....................................................................
ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS ....................................................
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .........................................................

360,240
192,105
7,101

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 .............................................

559,446

........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION
180
190
200

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210
220
230
240

ACCESSION TRAINING
OFFICER ACQUISITION ...................................................................
RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................
ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ........................................................
SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS .............................

115,992
52,323
43,589
453,745

........................
........................
........................
........................

250
260
270
280

BASIC SKILL AND ADVANCED TRAINING
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING .......................................................
FLIGHT TRAINING ...........................................................................
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..................................
TRAINING SUPPORT .......................................................................

1,034,495
1,016,876
186,565
652,514

1,034,495
1,051,876
186,565
652,514

........................
∂35,000
........................
........................

290
300
310
320
330

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
EXAMINING ....................................................................................
OFF–DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ......................................
CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .............................................
JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS .............................

485,500
170,912
251,523
184,422
181,105

485,500
170,912
251,523
184,422
185,105

........................
........................
........................
........................
∂4,000

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 .............................................

4,829,561

4,868,561

∂39,000

1,023,946

........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
340

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS ...................................................................

39
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

350
360
370
380

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ...................................................
CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ........................................................
LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................
AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT ..........................................................

690,089
774,120
651,765
453,051

........................
........................
........................
........................

390
400
410
420
430
440
450
460

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................
MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ............................................................
OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .......................................................
OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ............................................................
ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES .............................................................
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .........................................................
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................................

487,737
1,563,115
326,853
234,364
1,212,091
243,540
241,101
226,291

460,955
1,563,115
313,853
234,364
1,191,091
243,540
241,101
226,291

¥26,782
........................
¥13,000
........................
¥21,000
........................
........................
........................

460
470

SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS
SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS ...................................................
MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS ............................................

426,651
27,248

........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

8,581,962

8,521,180

¥60,782

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................
DTRA TRANSFER NOT ACCOUNTED FOR .......................................

........................
........................

¥378,000
¥8,000

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY ...............

35,073,077

36,938,580

∂1,865,503

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

111

112

113

114

115

116

121

Item

MANEUVER UNITS .....................................................................
Restoring Readiness: Army Unfunded Requirement for
Brigade Combat Teams ..............................................
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .................................................
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .....................................................
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ...........................................................
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Training Programs .....
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
AVIATION ASSETS ......................................................................
Restoring Readiness: Army Unfunded Requirement for
Flying Hour Program ...................................................
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...............................
Improving Funds Management: Lack of Justification for
Increases for Forward Operating Budget Requests ....
Restoring Readiness: Army Unfunded Requirement for
Force Readiness Operations Support ..........................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

888,114

1,276,685

∂388,571

........................

∂171,000

........................
72,624

........................
80,890

∂217,571
∂8,266

........................
617,402

........................
674,028

∂8,266
∂56,626

........................
602,262

........................
614,866

∂56,626
∂12,604

........................
1,032,484
........................

........................
1,154,051
........................

∂12,604
∂121,567
¥10,000

........................
1,287,462

........................
1,379,121

∂131,567
∂91,659

........................

∂63,000

........................
3,559,656

........................
3,540,427

∂28,659
¥19,229

........................

¥228,229

........................

∂209,000

40
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

123

131

132

322

335
431

433

435

UNDIST
UNDIST

Item

LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................................
Restoring Readiness: Army Unfunded Requirement for
Reset ...........................................................................
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ....................................................
Environmental Conservation for Ranges to Address
Shortfalls .....................................................................
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ......................................................................................
Transfer: Arlington National Cemetery Funded in the
Military Construction & Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill ......................................................................
Army Unfunded Requirement for Facility Sustainment,
Restoration and Modernization ...................................
FLIGHT TRAINING .......................................................................
Restoring Readiness: Army Unfunded Requirement for
Flight Training .............................................................
JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................................
Increase for JROTC Program ............................................
ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................
Reduce Duplication: Eliminate Requested Growth to
Headquarters ...............................................................
MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ........................................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Civilian Workforce
Transformation Program Funded in Budget Activity
3 ..................................................................................
OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ........................................................
Reduce Duplication: Eliminate Requested Growth to
Management and Operations ......................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Justification Does Not
Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for
the Defense Finance and Accounting Service Bill .....
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian
Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Defense Threat Reduction
Agency Transfer Not Properly Accounted for in Budget
Documentation .....................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

1,481,156

2,584,156

∂1,103,000

........................
7,278,154

........................
7,413,375

∂1,103,000
∂135,221

........................

∂10,000

........................

∂125,221

2,754,712

3,129,712

∂375,000

........................

¥25,000

........................
1,016,876

........................
1,051,876

∂400,000
∂35,000

........................
181,105
........................
487,737

........................
185,105
........................
460,955

∂35,000
∂4,000
∂4,000
¥26,782

........................
326,853

........................
313,853

¥26,782
¥13,000

........................
1,212,091

........................
1,191,091

¥13,000
¥21,000

........................

¥13,000

........................

¥8,000

........................

¥378,000

........................

¥8,000

Army Force Structure.—In late June of 2013, the Army announced plans to reduce its number of brigade combat teams
[BCTs] from 45 to 33 by the end of fiscal year 2017 as a result of
the Budget Control Act of 2011. The near-term funding reductions
will be met through a reduction in authorized end strength from
approximately 570,000 Active Duty and 358,000 Army National
Guard to approximately 490,000 and 350,000, respectively. The
Army Reserve will forgo a planned growth of 1,000 soldiers and
will remain at 205,000. Twelve BCTs will be eliminated, but the remaining BCTs will be reorganized by adding one maneuver battalion (from 2 to 3) as well as engineer and fire capabilities, to
make armor and infantry BCTs more lethal, flexible, and agile.
Despite the timing of the announcement, the Army claims that
the budgetary implications of the restructuring decisions are included in the fiscal year 2014 President’s budget submission. However, the cost of the restructuring cannot be identified in the budget justification. Therefore, the Committee directs the Army to provide a full cost analysis of its restructuring and stationing decisions
to the congressional defense committees no later than 90 days after

41
the enactment of this act. The cost analysis shall include the following data broken out by fiscal year beginning in fiscal year 2014
and for each subsequent fiscal year across the future year defense
plan [FYDP]: (a) the costs and savings assumed by appropriation
with line item detail, and (b) workforce implications by showing
changes broken out by civilian and contractor personnel.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, NAVY

2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $41,599,550,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 39,945,237,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 41,613,205,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.
emergency funding of $40,015,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013
(division A of Public Law 113–2).
2 Includes

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $41,613,205,000.
This is $1,667,968,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80

AIR OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ...................................
FLEET AIR TRAINING .....................................................................
AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND ENGINEERING SERVICES ...........
AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ......................................
AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ................................................................
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................
AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .....................................
AVIATION LOGISTICS ......................................................................

4,952,522
1,826,404
38,639
90,030
362,700
915,881
35,838
379,914

5,064,522
1,826,404
38,639
155,030
362,700
1,036,881
35,838
379,914

∂112,000
........................
........................
∂65,000
........................
∂121,000
........................
........................

90
100
110
120

SHIP OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ......................................
SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING .................................
SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...........................................................
SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................

3,884,836
734,852
5,191,511
1,351,274

4,620,836
734,852
5,191,511
1,381,274

∂736,000
........................
........................
∂30,000

130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220

COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS/SUPPORT
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ..........................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE .................................................................
SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE ..........................................
WARFARE TACTICS ........................................................................
OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ....................
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ..........................................................
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ...........................................................
DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................
COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS ...........................
COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ..............

701,316
97,710
172,330
454,682
328,406
946,429
142,249
2,603
102,970
199,128

681,316
97,710
172,330
454,682
328,406
1,087,297
142,249
2,603
102,970
199,128

¥20,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂140,868
........................
........................
........................
........................

230
240
250
260
270

WEAPONS SUPPORT
CRUISE MISSILE ............................................................................
FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE .............................................................
IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ...................................
WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ..............................................................
OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............................................

92,671
1,193,188
105,985
532,627
304,160

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

42
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

280
290
300

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BASE SUPPORT
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .....................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..........................................................

1,011,528
1,996,821
4,460,918

1,011,528
2,096,821
4,830,918

........................
∂100,000
∂370,000

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

32,610,122

34,264,990

∂1,654,868

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION
310

READY RESERVE AND PREPOSITIONING FORCES
SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ..............................................

331,576

........................

320
330

ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS
AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ........................................
SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ................................................

6,638
222,752

6,638
272,752

........................
∂50,000

340
350
360

MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS
FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM ...........................................................
INDUSTRIAL READINESS ................................................................
COAST GUARD SUPPORT ...............................................................

73,310
2,675
23,794

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 .............................................

660,745

710,745

∂50,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING
370
380
390

ACCESSION TRAINING
OFFICER ACQUISITION ...................................................................
RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS ..........................................

148,516
9,384
139,876

........................
........................
........................

400
410
420
430

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING .......................................................
FLIGHT TRAINING ...........................................................................
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..................................
TRAINING SUPPORT .......................................................................

630,069
9,294
169,082
164,368

........................
........................
........................
........................

440
450
460
470

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................
CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .............................................
JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................................

241,733
139,815
94,632
51,373

242,833
139,815
94,632
53,373

∂1,100
........................
........................
∂2,000

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 .............................................

1,798,142

1,801,242

∂3,100

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
480
490
500
510
520
530

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
EXTERNAL RELATIONS ...................................................................
CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT .................
MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................
OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .......................................................
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................

886,088
13,131
115,742
382,150
268,403
317,293

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

550
570
580
590
600
610

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ...................................................
PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .........................................
ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .................................
HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT ..........................
COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS ........................................................
SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS ..............................

207,128
295,855
1,140,484
52,873
27,587
75,728

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

620

SECURITY PROGRAMS
NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ....................................................

543,026

........................

680

SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS
INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES .........................

4,965

........................

OTHER PROGRAMS
OTHER PROGRAMS ........................................................................

545,775

........................

43
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................
FURTHER EFFICIENCIES TO BE GAINED FROM CONSOLIDATING
CONTRACTING EFFORTS ............................................................
OVERESTIMATE OF FY13 BASELINE FOR CIVILIAN COMPENSATION ..........................................................................................
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY ................

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

4,876,228

........................

¥10,000

........................

¥30,000

39,945,237

41,613,205

∂1,667,968

4,876,228

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

1A1A

1A4A

1A5A

1B1B

1B5B

1C1C

1C6C

BSM1

BSS1

2B2G

3C1L
3C5L

Item

MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............................
Restoring Readiness: Navy Unfunded Requirement for
Other Flight Operations .............................................
Restoring Readiness: Department of the Navy Unfunded Requirement for Special Purpose Marine Air
Ground Task Force-Crisis Response (Aviation) .........
AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ................................
Restoring Readiness: Navy Unfunded Requirement for
Naval Air Systems Command ...................................
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................
Restoring Readiness: Navy Unfunded Requirement for
Air Depot Maintenance ..............................................
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ................................
Restoring Readiness: Navy Unfunded Requirement for
Other Ship Operations ...............................................
Transfer from Title IX: Ship Operations ........................
SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................
Restoring Readiness: Navy Unfunded Requirement for
Ship Depot Operations Support ................................
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ....................................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Justification Does
Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes
for DISN Subscription Services .................................
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ....................................................
Reduce Duplication: Human Resource Functions .........
Restoring Readiness: Navy Unfunded Requirement for
Navy Expeditionary Combat Enterprise Reset/
Depot .........................................................................
Restoring Readiness: Navy Unfunded Requirement for
Fleet Cyber Command/Navy Cyber Forces ................
SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ..............
Navy Unfunded Requirement for Facility Sustainment,
Restoration and Modernization .................................
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ....................................................
Navy Unfunded Requirement for Environmental Compliance, Collateral Equipment and Shore Infrastructure ............................................................................
Environmental Conservation for Ranges to Address
Shortfalls ...................................................................
SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ..........................................
Navy Unfunded Requirement for Completion of USS
ENTERPRISE ...............................................................
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ..............................................
Naval Sea Cadet Corps .................................................
JUNIOR ROTC ..........................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

4,952,522

5,064,522

∂112,000

........................

∂51,000

........................
90,030

........................
155,030

∂61,000
∂65,000

........................
915,881

........................
1,036,881

∂65,000
∂121,000

........................
3,884,836

........................
4,620,836

∂121,000
∂736,000

........................
........................
1,351,274

........................
........................
1,381,274

∂225,000
∂511,000
∂30,000

........................
701,316

........................
681,316

∂30,000
¥20,000

........................
946,429
........................

........................
1,087,297
........................

¥20,000
∂140,868
¥11,132

........................

∂112,000

........................
1,996,821

........................
2,096,821

∂40,000
∂100,000

........................
4,460,918

........................
4,830,918

∂100,000
∂370,000

........................

∂360,000

........................
222,752

........................
272,752

∂10,000
∂50,000

........................
241,733
........................
51,373

........................
242,833
........................
53,373

∂50,000
∂1,100
∂1,100
∂2,000

44
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Increase for JROTC Program ..........................................
EXTERNAL RELATIONS .............................................................
Funds Budgeted for Stennis Center for Public Service
Available Only for Execution of That Program .........
Maintain Program Affordability: Further Efficiencies to be
Gained from Consolidating Contracting Efforts ................
Improving Funds Management: Overstatement of Fiscal
Year 2013 Baseline for Civilian Compensation ................

........................
13,131

∂2,000
..........................

........................

[1,000]

........................

¥10,000

........................

¥30,000

Line

4A2M

UNDIST
UNDIST

Naval Shipyard Apprentice Program.—The Committee directs
that during fiscal year 2014 the Navy shall induct classes of no
fewer than 100 apprentices, respectively, at each of the naval shipyards. The Committee further directs the Navy to include the costs
of the fiscal year 2015 class of apprentices in its budget request.
U.S. Coast Guard.—The Committee is aware that Department of
Defense [DOD] regulations currently restrict DOD mission appropriated funded activities from offering reimbursable rates to nonDOD agencies. This restriction forces the Navy to charge the U.S.
Coast Guard fully burdened rates for drydocking services at Navy
shipyards rather than reimbursable rates. Therefore, the Committee directs that funds appropriated under Operation and Maintenance, Navy may be used to pay overhead costs incurred by a
Naval Shipyard when drydocking U.S. Coast Guard ships.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS

2013 1

$6,026,999,000
6,254,650,000
6,359,736,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,359,736,000.
This is $105,086,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES
OPERATIONAL FORCES ..................................................................
FIELD LOGISTICS ...........................................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................

837,012
894,555
223,337

935,098
894,555
279,337

∂98,086
........................
∂56,000

40
60
70

USMC PREPOSITIONING
MARITIME PREPOSITIONING ..........................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..........................................................

97,878
774,619
2,166,661

97,878
774,619
2,151,661

........................
........................
¥15,000

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

4,994,062

5,133,148

∂139,086

45
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING
80
90

ACCESSION TRAINING
RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................
OFFICER ACQUISITION ...................................................................

17,693
896

........................
........................

100
120
130

BASIC SKILLS AND ADVANCED TRAINING
SPECIALIZED SKILLS TRAINING .....................................................
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..................................
TRAINING SUPPORT .......................................................................

100,806
46,928
356,426

........................
........................
........................

140
150
160

RECRUITING AND OTHER TRAINING EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................
JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................................

179,747
52,255
23,138

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 .............................................

777,889

........................

SERVICEWIDE SUPPORT
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ...................................................
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .................................

43,816
305,107
87,500

43,816
321,107
87,500

........................
∂16,000
........................

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS ...................................................................

46,276

........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
180
190
200

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

482,699

498,699

∂16,000

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................
UNJUSTIFIED GROWTH FOR STUDY AND ANALYSIS
CONTRACTORS ..........................................................................

........................

¥35,000

........................

¥15,000

6,254,650

6,359,736

∂105,086

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE
CORPS .........................................................................

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

1A1A

1A3A
BSS1

4A4G

UNDIST

Item

OPERATIONAL FORCES ..............................................................
Marine Corps Unfunded Requirement for Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force-Crisis
Response .....................................................................
Marine Corps Unfunded Requirement for Cyber Civilian
and Contractor Personnel ...........................................
Transfer from Title IX: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .......................................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...............................................................
Authorization Adjustment: Depot Maintenance ...............
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ......................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Unjustified Contractor
Growth .........................................................................
Environmental Conservation for Ranges to Address
Shortfalls .....................................................................
ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................
Marine Corps Unfunded Requirement for Marine Security Guard Expansion ...................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian
Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

837,012

935,098

∂98,086

........................

∂26,600

........................

∂5,000

........................
223,337
........................
2,166,661

........................
279,337
........................
2,151,661

∂66,486
∂56,000
∂56,000
¥15,000

........................

¥20,000

........................
305,107

........................
321,107

∂5,000
∂16,000

........................

∂16,000

........................

¥35,000

46
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

UNDIST

Maintain Program Affordability: Unjustified Growth for Study
and Analysis Contractors .....................................................

........................

¥15,000

OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2013 1 2 ......................................................................... $34,743,007,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 37,270,842,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 37,626,333,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.
2 Includes emergency funding of $8,500,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013
(division A of Public Law 113–2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $37,626,333,000.
This is $355,491,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30
50
60
70

AIR OPERATIONS
PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...........................................................
COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES .................................................
AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING ...........................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..........................................................

3,295,814
1,875,095
1,559,109
5,956,304
1,834,424
2,779,811

3,442,614
1,875,095
1,549,109
6,500,404
1,909,424
2,789,811

∂146,800
........................
¥10,000
∂544,100
∂75,000
∂10,000

80
90
100

COMBAT RELATED OPERATIONS
GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ...............................................
OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT PROGRAMS ....................
TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ......................

913,841
916,837
720,349

902,329
916,837
720,349

¥11,512
........................
........................

SPACE OPERATIONS
LAUNCH FACILITIES .......................................................................
SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ...........................................................
COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ..............
COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS ...........................
TRANSFER TO TITLE IX: READINESS AND DEPOT

305,275
433,658
1,146,016
231,830

305,275
433,658
1,141,116
231,830

........................
........................
¥4,900
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

21,968,363

22,717,851

∂749,488

MOBILITY OPERATIONS
AIRLIFT OPERATIONS .....................................................................
MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS .....................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE SUPPORT .............................................................................

2,015,902
147,216
1,556,232
167,402
707,040

2,015,902
142,216
1,556,232
161,402
707,040

........................
¥5,000
........................
¥6,000
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2 .............................................

4,593,792

4,582,792

¥11,000

102,334

........................

110
120
130
140

BUDGET ACTIVITY 2: MOBILIZATION
150
160
170
180
190

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING
200

ACCESSION TRAINING
OFFICER ACQUISITION ...................................................................

47
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

210
220
230
240

RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................
RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ...............................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE SUPPORT (ACADEMIES ONLY) .............................................

17,733
94,600
217,011
800,327

........................
........................
........................
........................

250
260
270
280
290

399,364
792,275
248,958
106,741
319,331

399,364
792,275
248,958
106,741
339,331

........................
........................
........................
........................
∂20,000

300
310
320
330
340

RECRUITING, AND OTHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
EXAMINING ....................................................................................
OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................
CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .............................................
JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................................

122,736
3,679
137,255
176,153
67,018

122,736
3,679
137,255
176,153
69,018

........................
........................
........................
........................
∂2,000

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 .............................................

3,605,515

3,627,515

∂22,000

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
350
360
370
380
390

LOGISTICS OPERATIONS
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ................................................................
TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ..................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE SUPPORT .............................................................................

1,103,684
919,923
56,601
281,061
1,203,305

1,023,684
919,923
56,601
281,061
1,198,128

¥80,000
........................
........................
........................
¥5,177

400
410
420
430

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................
OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ..................................................
CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION .................................................

593,865
574,609
1,028,600
24,720

593,865
574,609
1,003,600
28,400

........................
........................
¥25,000
∂3,680

SECURITY PROGRAMS
SECURITY PROGRAMS ...................................................................

1,227,796

1,220,296

¥7,500

SUPPORT TO OTHER NATIONS
INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT .............................................................

89,008

........................

460

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

7,103,172

6,989,175

¥113,997

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................
OVERSIGHT OF SPARE PARTS CHARGES .......................................

........................
........................

¥281,000
¥10,000

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE .......

37,270,842

37,626,333

∂355,491

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

011A

011D

011M

Item

PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .....................................................
Restoring Readiness: Air Force Unfunded Requirement
for Flying Hours and Training Ranges .....................
AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) ..............
Maintain Program Affordability: Unjustified Increase
for Training Contracts ...............................................
Increase for Ranges ......................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

3,295,814

3,442,614

∂146,800

........................
1,559,109

........................
1,549,109

∂146,800
¥10,000

........................
........................
5,956,304

........................
........................
6,500,404

¥30,000
∂20,000
∂544,100

48
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

011R

011Z

012A

015A
021D

021R

032M
033E
041A

041Z

042G

042I
UNDIST
UNDIST
UNDIST

Item

Restoring Readiness: Air Force Unfunded Requirement
for Weapon System Sustainment ..............................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ....................................................................................
Air Force Unfunded Requirement for Facility
Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization ...........
BASE SUPPORT .......................................................................
Environmental Conservation for Ranges to Address
Shortfalls ...................................................................
GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING .........................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Justification Does
Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes
for DISN Subscription Services .................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Foreign Currency
Fluctuation Pricing Requested as Program
Growth .......................................................................
COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ........
Classified Program Decrease ........................................
MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ...............................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Unjustified Program
Growth for the Afloat Preposition Fleet ....................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ....................................................................................
Improving Funds Management: Reimbursable Costs
From the Transportation Working Capital Fund Requested as Program Growth .....................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................
Authorization Adjustment: Depot Maintenance .............
JUNIOR ROTC ..........................................................................
Increase for JROTC Program ..........................................
LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ..........................................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Cancellation of Expeditionary Command Support System Not Accounted for in Justification .......................................
BASE SUPPORT .......................................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Public-Private Competitions ....................................................................
OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Justification Does
Not Match Summary of Price and Program Changes
for the Defense Finance and Accounting Services
Bill .............................................................................
CIVIL AIR PATROL ...................................................................
Civil Air Patrol ...............................................................
SECURITY PROGRAMS .............................................................
Classified Adjustment ...................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian
Full Time Equivalent Targets .............................................
Improving Funds Management: Air Force Oversight of Spare
Parts Charges ....................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

........................

∂544,100

1,834,424

1,909,424

∂75,000

........................
2,779,811

........................
2,789,811

∂75,000
∂10,000

........................
913,841

........................
902,329

∂10,000
¥11,512

........................

¥9,000

........................
1,146,016
........................
147,216

........................
1,141,116
........................
142,216

¥2,512
¥4,900
¥4,900
¥5,000

........................

¥5,000

167,402

161,402

¥6,000

........................
319,331
........................
67,018
........................
1,103,684

........................
339,331
........................
69,018
........................
1,023,684

¥6,000
∂20,000
∂20,000
∂2,000
∂2,000
¥80,000

........................
1,203,305

........................
1,198,128

¥80,000
¥5,177

........................
1,028,600

........................
1,003,600

¥5,177
¥25,000

........................
24,720
........................
1,227,796
........................

........................
28,400
........................
1,220,296
........................

¥25,000
∂3,680
∂3,680
¥7,500
¥7,500

........................

¥281,000

........................

¥10,000

Demonstration Program for Contractors Employing Persons with
Disabilities.—The Committee commends the Air Force for fulfilling
requirements for the scanning and digitization of millions of personnel records through the employment of persons with severe disabilities, who would otherwise receive social security disability benefits. This effort has allowed those with disabilities to find sustainable employment and achieve self-sufficiency, while ultimately
achieving substantial taxpayer savings. The Committee encourages
the Air Force to continue this important program using eligible

49
contractors for its scanning and digitization requirements and
other appropriate work.
Lajes Air Base.—The Committee supports the continued bilateral
relationship the United States has with Portugal, particularly with
respect to United States-NATO operations. However, given current
budget constraints, the Committee recognizes the Air Force’s need
to consolidate its force structure and operations at Lajes Air Base
on Terceira Island in the Azores. The Committee understands this
reduction will also impact host country civilian positions and the
local economy. The Committee encourages the Department to continue to work closely with Portuguese and Azorean officials to minimize the economic impacts to the local population and to continue
to explore all possibilities for other U.S. Government uses of Lajes
Air Base. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the congressional defense committees not later
than 90 days after the enactment of this act on United States Air
Force plans for a continued U.S. presence at Lajes Air Base; steps
to be taken to mitigate adverse effects on the surrounding community; and initiatives to strengthen and enhance the strategic relationship between the U.S. and Portugal.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... $31,820,931,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 32,997,693,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 32,597,068,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $32,597,068,000.
This is $400,625,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ................................................................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .................................................

472,239
5,261,463

450,539
5,131,233

¥21,700
¥130,230

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

5,733,702

5,581,772

¥151,930

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY ..............................................
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY ...................................................

157,397
84,899

........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3 .............................................

242,296

........................

144,443
612,207
1,378,606
763,091
1,326,243
29,933

182,443
583,207
1,319,606
766,091
1,340,749
29,933

∂38,000
¥29,000
¥59,000
∂3,000
∂14,506
........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 3: TRAINING AND RECRUITING
30
40

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
50
80
90
110
120
140

CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS ..........................................................
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ............................................
DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ...............................
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY ......................................
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ..................................
DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY .............................................

50
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
250
260
270

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY .......................................................
DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY .............................................................
DEFENSE POW /MISSING PERSONS OFFICE ..................................
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY ................................
DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE .......................................................
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY AGENCY ..................................
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ........................................
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY .........................
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ...........................................................
OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT .............................................
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ....................................
WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES .....................................
OTHER PROGRAMS ........................................................................

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

462,545
222,979
21,594
788,389
546,603
35,151
438,033
2,713,756
256,201
371,615
2,010,176
616,572
14,283,558

461,517
222,979
21,594
761,589
559,103
35,151
438,033
2,713,756
385,057
98,315
1,978,176
611,572
14,219,129

¥1,028
........................
........................
¥26,800
∂12,500
........................
........................
........................
∂128,856
¥273,300
¥32,000
¥5,000
¥64,429

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

27,021,695

26,728,000

¥293,695

IMPACT AID
IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES ...........................

........................
........................

40,000
5,000

∂40,000
∂5,000

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSEWIDE ............................................................................

32,997,693

32,597,068

¥400,625

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ............................................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Justification Does Not
Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for
Rents ...........................................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .............................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overstatement of Maintenance Costs for Family of Special Operations Vehicles ..............................................................................
Budget
Documentation
Disparity:
Collateral
Equipment ...................................................................
Authorization Adjustment: SOCOM NCR ..........................
Reduce Duplication: Contingency Operations Unjustified
Growth .........................................................................
Other Operations-Human Physiological Performance
Program-Transfer to DHP ............................................
Authorization Adjustment: Regional Security Cooperation
Centers ........................................................................
Classified Adjustment .....................................................
CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS ......................................................
Youth Challenge ..............................................................
Authorization Adjustment: STARBASE ..............................
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ........................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ..............................
DISA–Requested Transfer From Procurement, Defensewide Line 12 for the Senior Leadership Enterprise
Program .......................................................................
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ...................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

472,239

450,539

¥21,700

........................

¥3,700

........................
5,261,463

........................
5,131,233

¥18,000
¥130,230

........................

¥20,000

........................
........................

¥5,000
¥7,100

........................

¥35,519

........................

¥8,786

........................
........................
144,443
........................
........................
612,207

........................
........................
182,443
........................
........................
583,207

¥14,725
¥39,100
∂38,000
∂10,000
∂28,000
¥29,000

........................
1,326,243

........................
1,340,749

¥29,000
∂14,506

........................
462,545

........................
461,517

∂14,506
¥1,028

51
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

UNDIST
UNDIST

Item

Budget Documentation Disparity: Justification Does Not
Match Summary of Price and Program Changes for
DISA .............................................................................
Procurement Technical Assistance Program ...................
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY ..................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................
Program Increase-Suicide Prevention Office ...................
DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ...........................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY ............................
Maintain Program Affordability: Global Train and
Equip ...........................................................................
Authorization Adjustment: Regional Centers for Security
Centers-Undistributed Decrease .................................
Authorization Adjustment: Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program ...............................................................
DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ...................................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Transfer to Washington Headquarters Service for Central Adjudication
Facility Not Fully Accounted For .................................
Increase to Alleviate Security Clearance Backlog ...........
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY .......................................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: THAAD Excess to Requirement ....................................................................
Improving Funds Management: Transfer Sustainment
Funds from RDDW, Line 82 to BMD Midcourse Defense Segment for Execution ......................................
OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT .........................................
Authorization Adjustment: Guam .....................................
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................
Authorization Adjustment: Funds to Support BRAC
2015 ............................................................................
Authorization Adjustment: OUSD (Policy) Program Decrease ..........................................................................
Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative ........
Expansion of Healthy Base Initiative ..............................
WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICE ...................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Price Growth Requested as Program Growth .......................................
OTHER PROGRAMS ....................................................................
Classified Adjustment .....................................................
Observant Compass ISR ..................................................
MSIC: Restore Program Reduction to Address Unfunded
Requirements ..............................................................
Authorization Adjustment: Impact Aid .....................................
Authorization Adjustment: Impact Aid for Children with Severe Disabilities ...................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

........................
........................
763,091

........................
........................
766,091

¥11,028
∂10,000
∂3,000

........................
........................
1,378,606

........................
........................
1,319,606

¥7,000
∂10,000
¥59,000

........................
788,389

........................
761,589

¥59,000
¥26,800

........................

¥7,800

........................

¥12,000

........................
546,603

........................
559,103

¥7,000
∂12,500

........................
........................
256,201

........................
........................
385,057

¥7,500
∂20,000
∂128,856

........................

¥14,000

........................
371,615
........................
2,010,176

........................
98,315
........................
1,978,176

∂142,856
¥273,300
¥273,300
¥32,000

........................

¥37,000

........................

¥8,000

........................
........................
........................
616,572

........................
........................
........................
611,572

¥5,000
∂15,000
∂3,000
¥5,000

........................
14,283,558
........................
........................

........................
14,219,129
........................
........................

¥5,000
¥64,429
¥104,429
∂30,000

........................
........................

∂10,000
∂40,000

........................

∂5,000

Special Operations Command Budget Justification Materials.—
The level of detail provided in budget justification documents is not
sufficient for Special Operations Command’s [SOCOM] operation
and maintenance [O&M] resources. With increased requirements
driving larger budget requests, the Committee needs more itemized
information in order to conduct proper oversight. Therefore, the
Committee directs that budget activities be established for
SOCOM’s O&M budget. Additionally, SOCOM is directed to submit
an OP–5 Operation and Maintenance Detail exhibit and OP–32

52
Summary of Price and Program Changes exhibit for each budget
subactivity. Finally, the Committee directs that normal prior approval reprogramming procedures be used to transfer funds between budget activities in excess of $15 million. The following table
assigns the budget activity and budget subactivity structure:
Budget Activity 1 includes Subactivities:
Combat Development Activities
Flight Operations
Other Operations
Ship/Boat Operations
Base Support
Communications
Force Related Training
Intelligence
Maintenance
Management/Operational Headquarters
Operational Support
Budget Activity 3 includes Subactivities:
Professional Development
Specialized Skill Training
Budget Activity 4 includes Subactivity:
Acquisition/Program Management
Defense Language and National Security Education Office.—The
Committee recognizes that, in partnership with universities across
the country, the Defense Language and National Security Education Office provides critical training for servicemembers and government officials in a number of languages and strategic cultures,
including those of the Arab world, Afghanistan, China, and Iran.
The Committee encourages the Department of Defense to continue
placing a high priority on these programs to ensure warfighters receive the language and culture training needed to complete their
missions effectively.
Military Use Airspace.—The Committee encourages the Department of Defense to continue to utilize national assets such as the
Hays Military Operations Area to maintain airborne combat readiness for both manned and remotely piloted aircraft.
Middle East Regional Security Studies Programs.—The Committee encourages the Department of Defense to continue to support established university programs that promote region-wide informal workshops and task forces on arms control, regional security, and related topics to the Middle East for Arab, Israeli and
other officials and experts engaged in these issues.
Meals Ready-To-Eat War Reserve.—The Committee is concerned
that the Defense Logistics Agency’s [DLA] potential reduction of its
Meals Ready-to-Eat [MRE] war reserve could harm the industrial
base and threaten the Department’s ‘‘Go to War’’ capabilities.
Therefore, the Committee encourages the Director of DLA, in conjunction with the military services and industry, to develop a comprehensive plan to address the aggregate MRE requirements for
each of the military services that considers war time surge requirements and timely rotation of the MRE war reserve.
Military Dependent Student Online Assistance.—The Committee
understands children of Active Duty military families are faced

53
with unique educational challenges in part because of frequent
changes of station over the course of childhood. In order to meet
these challenges, military parents can substantially benefit from
access to Internet-based educational resources that can be brought
to bear on the individualized needs of their children. The Department is encouraged to provide an assessment tool with accompanying resource material that helps parents to engage with children to develop conceptual understandings and to improve learning
and skills.
Wildlife Trafficking.—The proceeds of animal poaching and wildlife trafficking are known to fund armed conflict on the African
continent, including by the Lord’s Resistance Army and other destabilizing groups in the Great Lakes Region. The Committee supports efforts by Africa Command and Special Operations Command
to assist in the mitigation of these illegal activities through their
capacity-building engagements with African governments and authorities, including ‘‘train the trainer’’ exchanges and exercises. The
Committee expects Africa Command and Special Operations Command to continue these engagements in areas affected by wildlife
trafficking.
The Committee also directs the Secretary of Defense to provide
a report to the congressional defense committees within 120 days
of enactment of this act describing the planned activities to support
implementation of the Executive Order establishing the Presidential Task Force on Wildlife Trafficking.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE

2013 1

$3,178,723,000
3,095,036,000
3,096,436,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,096,436,000.
This is $1,400,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30
40
50
60

1,621
24,429
657,099
122,485
584,058
79,380

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

70
80
90

LAND FORCES READINESS
FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................
LAND FORCES SYSTEM READINESS ..............................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................

471,616
74,243
70,894

........................
........................
........................

54
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

100
110
120

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

LAND FORCES READINESS SUPPORT
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS HEADQUARTERS ........................

569,801
294,145
51,853

569,801
330,545
51,853

........................
∂36,400
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

3,001,624

3,038,024

∂36,400

10,735
24,197
10,304
10,319
37,857

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
130
140
150
160
170

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ...................................................
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................
PERSONNEL/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION .....................................
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

93,412

........................

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................

........................

¥35,000

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY
RESERVE .....................................................................

3,095,036

3,096,436

∂1,400

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

132

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION ......................................................................................
Restore unjustified reductions from FSRM .....................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian
FTE Targets ..........................................................................

UNDIS

OPERATION

AND

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

294,145
........................

330,545
........................

∂36,400
∂36,400

........................

¥35,000

MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE

2013 1

$1,254,689,000
1,197,752,000
1,208,552,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,208,552,000.
This is $10,800,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

588,520

∂1,900

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10

RESERVE AIR OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ...................................

586,620

55
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

20
40
50
60

INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .......................................................
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................
AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .....................................
AVIATION LOGISTICS ......................................................................

7,008
100,657
305
3,927

7,008
100,657
9,205
3,927

........................
........................
∂8,900
........................

70
80
90

RESERVE SHIP OPERATIONS
MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ......................................
SHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRAINING ...............................
SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...........................................................

75,933
601
44,364

........................
........................
........................

100
110

RESERVE COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ..........................................................
COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ..........................................................

15,477
115,608

........................
........................

120
130

RESERVE WEAPONS SUPPORT
WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ..............................................................
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .....................................

1,967
43,726

........................
........................

140
150

BASE OPERATING SUPPORT
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..........................................................

69,011
109,604

........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

1,174,808

1,185,608

∂10,800

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
MILITARY MANPOWER & PERSONNEL ...........................................
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................
ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .................................

2,905
14,425
2,485
3,129

........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

22,944

........................

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY
RESERVE .....................................................................

1,197,752

1,208,552

∂10,800

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
160
170
180
190

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ...............................
Authorization Adjustment: Restoring Readiness .............
AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...............................................
Authorization Adjustment: Restoring Readiness .............

586,620
........................
305
........................

588,520
........................
9,205
........................

∂1,900
∂1,900
∂8,900
∂8,900

Line

1A1A
1A5A

OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE

Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$277,011,000
263,317,000
261,317,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $261,317,000.
This is $2,000,000 below the budget estimate.

56
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
40
50

EXPEDITIONARY FORCES
OPERATING FORCES ......................................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..........................................................

96,244
17,581
32,438
95,259

........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

241,522

........................

894
11,743
9,158

........................
........................
........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
70
80
90

21,795

........................

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................

........................

¥2,000

TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
RESERVE .....................................................................

263,317

261,317

¥2,000

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

UNDIST

Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian
Full Time Equivalent Targets ...............................................

........................

¥2,000

OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE

2013 1

$3,257,020,000
3,164,607,000
3,148,307,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,148,307,000.
This is $16,300,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

57
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30
40
50

AIR OPERATIONS
PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...........................................................
MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ...................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..........................................................

1,857,951
224,462
521,182
89,704
360,836

1,857,951
216,462
521,182
98,404
360,836

........................
¥8,000
........................
∂8,700
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

3,054,135

3,054,835

∂700

64,362
15,056
23,617
6,618
819

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
60
70
80
90
100

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................
OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .......................................................
AUDIOVISUAL .................................................................................
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

110,472

........................

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................

........................

¥17,000

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE. ........................................................................

3,164,607

3,148,307

¥16,300

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

011G

011R
UNDIS

Item

MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ...............................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Unjustified growth in
civilian personnel compensation ................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ..
Restore unjustified reductions from FSRM .....................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian
FTE Targets ..........................................................................

OPERATION

AND

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

224,462

216,462

¥8,000

........................
89,704
........................

........................
98,404
........................

¥8,000
∂8,700
∂8,700

........................

¥17,000

MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

2013 1 2

Appropriations,
.........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................

$7,147,885,000
7,054,196,000
7,082,599,000

1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.
emergency funding of $3,165,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013
(division A of Public Law 113–2).
2 Includes

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,082,599,000.
This is $28,403,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

58
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30
40
50
60

LAND FORCES
MANEUVER UNITS .........................................................................
MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .....................................................
ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .........................................................
THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ...............................................................
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..........................................
AVIATION ASSETS ..........................................................................

800,880
178,650
771,503
98,699
38,779
922,503

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

70
80
90

761,056
62,971
233,105

........................
........................
........................

100
110
120

1,019,059
712,139
1,013,715

1,029,059
786,339
1,000,418

∂10,000
∂74,200
¥13,297

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

6,613,059

6,683,962

∂70,903

10,812
78,284
46,995
6,390
297,105
1,551

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
140
150
160
170
180
140

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ...................................................
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................
MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ............................................................
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .........................................................
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

441,137

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................

........................

¥22,500

TRAVEL BUDGET REDUCTION ........................................................

........................

¥20,000

TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL
GUARD. ........................................................................

7,054,196

7,082,599

∂28,403

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]

Line

131
132
133

UNDIST
UNDIST

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..........................................................
State Directors of Psychological Health Program Increase ..
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, & MODERNIZATION .......
Restore unjustified reductions from FSRM ...........................
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ .............................................
Army National Guard Identified severance pay excess to requirement ..........................................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian FTE
Targets .......................................................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Travel Budget Reduction ............

1,019,059
......................
712,139
......................
1,013,715

1,029,059
......................
698,842
......................
1,000,418

∂10,000
∂10,000
∂74,200
∂74,200
¥13,297

......................

¥13,297

......................
......................

¥22,500
¥20,000

National Guard Industrial Base.—The National Guard Readiness
Sustainment and Maintenance Program serves as a surge capacity

59
during wartime to support Army depots and other facilities in the
repair, reset, and recap of Army and Army National Guard equipment. It also provides an independent source of repair for the National Guard to increase the equipment on hand of National Guard
units and to sustain a greater degree of readiness than could otherwise be maintained. The Committee urges that no less than the
amount provided for the National Guard Readiness Sustainment
and Maintenance Program in the fiscal year 2013 appropriations
bill be provided in the Land Forces Depot Maintenance, Army National Guard account for the repair and return of equipment and
vehicles.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD

2013 1 2

$6,491,531,000
6,566,004,000
6,505,204,000

1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.
2 Includes emergency funding of $5,775,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013
(division A of Public Law 113–2).

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,505,204,000.
This is $60,800,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD
BUDGET ACTIVITY 1: OPERATING FORCES
10
20
30
40
50

AIR OPERATIONS
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS .................................................................
MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ...................................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ......
BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..........................................................

3,371,871
720,305
1,514,870
296,953
597,303

3,371,871
720,305
1,514,870
325,153
597,303

........................
........................
........................
∂28,200
........................

TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1 .............................................

6,501,302

6,529,502

∂28,200

32,117
32,585

........................
........................

BUDGET ACTIVITY 4: ADMIN & SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
60
70

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
ADMINISTRATION ...........................................................................
RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ....................................................
TOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4 .............................................

64,702

........................

OVERESTIMATE OF CIVILIAN FTE TARGETS ...................................

........................

¥89,000

TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL
GUARD .........................................................................

6,566,004

6,505,204

¥60,800

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:

60
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ..
Restore unjustified reductions from FSRM .....................
Maintain Program Affordability: Overestimation of Civilian
FTE Targets ..........................................................................

296,953
........................

325,153
........................

∂28,200
∂28,200

........................

¥89,000

Line

011R
UNDIST

U.S. COURT

APPEALS

FOR THE

ARMED FORCES

$13,498,000
13,606,000
13,606,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $13,606,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$335,478,000
298,815,000
298,815,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $298,815,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$310,184,000
316,103,000
316,103,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $316,103,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$528,565,000
439,820,000
439,820,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $439,820,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$11,118,000
10,757,000
10,757,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,757,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

61
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$287,164,000
237,443,000
287,443,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $287,443,000.
This is $50,000,000 above the budget estimate to help address unfunded needs.
OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER,

AND

CIVIC AID

$108,615,000
109,500,000
109,500,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $109,500,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$518,426,000
528,455,000
528,455,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $528,455,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
Cooperative Threat Reduction.—The Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction [CTR] program has proven highly successful in its efforts to secure and dismantle weapons of mass destruction and their associated infrastructure in the former Soviet
Union and former Soviet bloc countries. On June 17, 2013, the Russian Government did not renew the umbrella agreement with the
United States Government. Therefore, the fiscal year 2014 program
will change substantially from its original plan. The Committee
recommends full funding in fiscal year 2014, but directs the Department to keep the congressional defense committees fully informed of changes to the existing program.
Improving Oversight.—For many years, the Cooperative Threat
Reduction program has not been able to obligate its funding in a
timely manner. Furthermore, the program has significant flexibility and lacks oversight of its funding. For example, the program
realigned 25 percent of the budget across different sub-accounts
after enactment. This flexibility allows for quick reaction changes
in spending, but the Committee has no insight as to why or when
these funding changes occur. Therefore, the Committee directs the
Cooperative Threat Reduction program to follow standard Department of Defense reprogramming procedures when transferring a
cumulative amount of $20,000,000 or 10 percent, whichever is lesser between sub-accounts.

62
DEPARTMENT

DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
FUND

$50,132,000
256,031,000
131,331,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $131,331,000.
This is $124,700,000 below the budget estimate.
Mandatory Transfers.—The Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund has been instrumental in increasing the quantity
and quality of the Department’s acquisition workforce. Since 2008,
the acquisition workforce has increased by 21 percent. The Committee believes the emphasis on improving the workforce is starting to positively impact overall acquisition performance. The General Accounting Office’s 2013 assessment of selected weapon programs identified a handful of positive trends: More than 60 percent
of programs realized an increase in buying power; an increased
percentage of programs are meeting cost performance metrics; and
eight of the ten costliest programs reported cost decreases over the
past year.
The fiscal year 2014 budget justification for Defense Acquisition
Workforce Development Fund states that the Department is now
close to meeting its acquisition workforce hiring goals. The budget
justification explains that the Department is now shifting its focus
‘‘from rebuilding workforce capacity to sustaining levels required to
perform the acquisition mission with acceptable risk and increase
our focus on deliberate training and development of that workforce.’’ Interestingly, the project level funding amounts in the budget justification do not correlate with this narrative. For fiscal year
2013, recruiting and hiring was estimated to be $374,000,000,
while the fiscal year 2014 request is $498,700,000. With planned
recruiting and hiring efforts leveling off or declining in fiscal year
2014, the budget request is overstated by $124,700,000.
The Committee believes this incongruity between the Department’s stated strategy and the funding request is caused by the
mandatory spending amounts established in title 10 of United
States Code, section 1705. In fiscal year 2014, the amounts established in title 10 require the Department make available at least
80 percent of $800,000,000 either through transfer from operation
and maintenance appropriations, or through direct appropriations.
Requiring the Department to spend $640,000,000 in fiscal year
2014 is excessive, especially given the fact that the fiscal year 2013
required spending amount was $400,000,000. Moreover, this Committee has encouraged the Department to fully fund its Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund request through the normal
appropriations process, instead of relying on the mandated transfers that are excess to need.
Over the past few years, the Committee has urged the Department to provide accurate and executable estimates of their annual
spending needs. The Committee notes that these estimates have
never been provided. Therefore, the Committee directs the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to
provide to the congressional defense committees within 15 days of

63
the delivery of the fiscal year 2015 President’s budget request, an
estimate of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund
funding needs for fiscal year 2015 through fiscal year 2019. This
estimate should represent the annual, executable funding need
given the current state of the acquisition workforce. Further, the
Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to fully fund the Defense
Acquisition Workforce Development Fund up to this estimated
amount.

TITLE III
PROCUREMENT
Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required to purchase military equipment and hardware, including
aircraft, ships, missiles, combat vehicles, ammunition, weapons,
electronic sensors and communications equipment, and other procurement items.
The President’s fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$98,153,503,000 for procurement appropriations.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends procurement appropriations totaling
$98,368,753,000 for fiscal year 2014. This is $215,250,000 above
the budget estimate.
Committee recommended procurement appropriations for fiscal
year 2014 are summarized below:
SUMMARY OF PROCUREMENT APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
Account

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Procurement:
Aircraft Procurement, Army ...............................................................
Missile Procurement, Army ...............................................................
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army ......
Procurement of Ammunition, Army ...................................................
Other Procurement, Army ..................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Navy ...............................................................
Weapons Procurement, Navy .............................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps .....................
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy ..................................................
Other Procurement, Navy ..................................................................
Procurement, Marine Corps ..............................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ........................................................
Missile Procurement, Air Force .........................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force .............................................
Other Procurement, Air Force ............................................................
Procurement, Defense-Wide ..............................................................
National Guard and Reserve Equipment ..........................................
Defense Production Act Purchases ...................................................

5,024,387
1,334,083
1,597,267
1,540,437
6,465,218
17,927,651
3,122,193
589,267
14,077,804
6,310,257
1,343,511
11,398,901
5,343,286
759,442
16,760,581
4,534,083
........................
25,135

4,931,222
1,277,125
1,572,828
1,454,067
6,242,899
17,501,539
3,107,400
594,467
14,420,693
6,058,377
1,325,407
10,917,270
5,178,486
759,442
17,542,627
4,434,769
1,000,000
50,135

¥93,165
¥56,958
¥24,439
¥86,370
¥222,319
¥426,112
¥14,793
∂5,200
∂342,889
¥251,880
¥18,104
¥481,631
¥164,800
........................
∂782,046
¥99,314
∂1,000,000
∂25,000

Total ..............................................................................................

98,153,503

98,368,753

∂215,250

Ordnance Plant Recapitalization.—The Committee notes that the
Department of Defense [DOD] does not have a long-term strategic
capital improvement plan in place to support its aging ordnance
plants. These facilities are supporting a multitude of essential DOD
requirements in support of the warfighter, yet these activities could
be disrupted if basic infrastructure needs, such as heating and cooling, power generation, safety and environmental hazards are not
(64)

65
addressed in the near future. Therefore, the Committee directs the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army to jointly establish a multi-year recapitalization plan for the ordnance plants,
including the industrial reserve, addressing these infrastructure
and environmental challenges, and to include the required funds in
future budget requests based on the most urgent needs identified.
The ordnance facility recapitalization plan shall be submitted to
the congressional defense committees not later than 90 days after
enactment of this act.
High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle [HMMWV].—The
Committee recognizes the value the HMMWV has brought to the
military, not only in contingency operations, but also in support of
domestic emergency response and humanitarian assistance efforts.
Furthermore, ensuring the capacity of the U.S. industrial base is
a national imperative. The Committee further recognizes that the
Army National Guard and the state Adjutants General strongly
support HMMWV modernization and have consistently included
new model HMMWVs among its funding priorities. Therefore, the
Committee urges the Department to continue to invest in and procure HMMWVs as part of its enduring vehicle fleet.
Organic Industrial Base of the United States.—The Committee
notes that the organic industrial base of the U.S. military advances
a vital national security interest by producing necessary materials,
munitions, and hardware when sources outside of the U.S. military
are unable to meet this urgent need as quickly as the organic industrial base, saving the lives of warfighters. The Committee believes that the capacity of the organic industrial base of the U.S.
military must be maintained and discourages the Department of
Defense from taking any action that would deteriorate this essential capability.
Arsenal Sustainment Initiative.—The Committee supports the ongoing efforts of the Department of the Army to develop the Army
Organic Industrial Base Strategy. This process is identifying manufacturing capabilities at each organic industrial facility that are
critical for this country to sustain in wartime and peacetime in
case the U.S. military is called to act. However, the Committee is
concerned that while the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy is
identifying capabilities, it will not fund these capabilities at a level
adequate to maintain them. In particular, the Nation’s arsenals are
at risk of not having the capacity to respond rapidly to meet the
Department’s needs. Due to the nature of operating under the
Working Capital Fund, the slowdown in production and production
capacity caused by sequestration is causing the workload rates to
increase for these plants to the point where they are not able to
compete for public/private partnerships and other business to help
sustain capacity in peacetime. In order to ensure that this industrial base is competitive, cost-effective, and ready when called on,
the Committee recommends $150,000,000 to the Army Defense
Working Capital Fund for the Industrial Mobilization Capacity account to address the issue of non-competitive rates at the arsenals,
which will better allow the arsenals to engage in public-private
partnerships to maintain these critical capabilities.
In addition, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to
assign the arsenals sufficient workload to maintain the critical ca-

66
pabilities identified in the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy
Report and ensure cost efficiency and technical competence in
peacetime, while preserving the ability to provide an effective and
timely response to mobilizations, national defense contingency situations, and other emergency requirements.
Further, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to release the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report within 30
days of enactment of this act, and brief the congressional defense
committees within 90 days of this act on its plan to ensure sufficient workload for the efficient operation of the arsenals.
Army Organic Industrial Base.—The Committee directs the Secretary of the Army to provide 45-day written notification to the
congressional defense committees prior to the Secretary approving
a civilian reductions in force that will result in an employment loss
of 50 or more full-time employees at any Army organic industrial
base facility. The notification shall include the impact that the proposed reduction in force will have on the ability to maintain the organic industrial base critical manufacturing capabilities as delineated in the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report, a detailed accounting of the costs of implementing the reduction in
force, and an assessment of the cost of, and time necessary, to restore any lost capability to meet future organic wartime manufacturing needs.
Light-Weight Ammunition.—As noted in the Senate report accompanying S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014, a current project the Department of Defense is
executing under Defense Production Act, Title III authority is developing a domestic production capability for light-weight polymerbased ammunition. The Committee agrees this effort has the potential to provide the warfighter with improved battlefield mobility
and better survivability. Additionally, it has the potential to decrease logistical burdens and reduce fuel consumption in military
operations. Accordingly, the Committee encourages the Department
to continue this effort and provide a briefing or report to this Committee no later than February 1, 2014, on ammunition projects
which could enhance warfighter capabilities and reduce logistical
burdens.
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
2013 1

$6,020,798,000
5,024,387,000
4,931,222,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,931,222,000.
This is $93,165,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT ....................................................................................................................

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS .........................................................................................................................
GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) .......................................................................................................................
MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) .......................................................................................................
AH–64 MODS ........................................................................................................................................
CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS ......................................................................................................
UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS ..........................................................................................................
UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS ..................................................................................................................
KIOWA WARRIOR ...................................................................................................................................
NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN ..............................................................................................................
COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ...............................................................................................................
GATM ROLLUP .......................................................................................................................................
RQ–7 UAV MODS ..................................................................................................................................

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT .......................................................................................

1,032,335

97,781
10,262
12,467
53,559
149,764
17,500
74,095
184,044
152,569
92,779
65,613
121,902

3,609,642

10
42
........................
65
........................
28
........................

ROTARY
HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) .......................................................................................................
AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN .....................................................................................................
AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN (AP–CY) .......................................................................................
UH–60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) ...................................................................................................................
UH–60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) (AP–CY) ....................................................................................................
CH–47 HELICOPTER .............................................................................................................................
CH–47 HELICOPTER (AP–CY) ...............................................................................................................

5
6
7
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

96,227
608,469
150,931
1,046,976
116,001
801,650
98,376

1
4
15
........................

19,730
142,050
518,460
10,772

2014 budget
estimate

FIXED WING
UTILITY F/W CARGO AIRCRAFT .............................................................................................................
AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ................................................................................................
MQ–1 UAV ............................................................................................................................................
RQ–11 (RAVEN) ....................................................................................................................................

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY

Qty.

1
2
3
4

AIRCRAFT

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
167
3
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

10
42
........................
65
........................
28
........................

1
2
15
........................

Qty.

953,373

97,781
10,262
10,467
53,559
149,764
14,000
84,095
108,282
144,869
92,779
65,613
121,902

3,595,439

171,227
608,469
150,931
1,032,915
116,001
801,650
82,534

18,052
85,050
518,460
10,150

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

¥78,962

........................
........................
¥2,000
........................
........................
¥3,500
∂10,000
¥75,762
¥7,700
........................
........................
........................

¥14,203

∂75,000
........................
........................
¥14,061
........................
........................
¥15,842

¥1,678
¥57,000
........................
¥622

Change from

........................
¥2
........................
........................

Qty.

........................
........................
........................
705
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................
SURVIVABILITY CM ...............................................................................................................................
CMWS ...................................................................................................................................................

OTHER SUPPORT
AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................
COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................
AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS ..........................................................................................................
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .........................................................................................................................
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .........................................................................................................................
LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET .....................................................................................................................

TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES .......................................................................

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ...............................................................................

30
31
32
33
34
35

Qty.

27
28
29

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

5,024,387

382,410

6,809
65,397
45,841
79,692
1,615
2,877

47,610
5,700
126,869

2014 budget
estimate

........................

705
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

Qty.

4,931,222

382,410

6,809
65,397
45,841
79,692
1,615
2,877

47,610
5,700
126,869

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

¥93,165

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

Change from

69
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

1
2
3
4
5
11
14

17
20
21
22

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Utility F/W Aircraft ..........................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Unit cost growth ...........
Aerial Common Sensor [ACS] [MIP] ...............................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: 2 aircraft reduction ...
MQ–1 UAV .......................................................................................
Funding only for SATCOM ......................................................
RQ–11 (RAVEN) ..............................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Unit cost growth ...........
Helicopter, Light Utility [LUH] ........................................................
Program increase only for UH–72 aircraft ............................
UH–60 Blackhawk M Model [MYP] .................................................
Improving funds management: Excess funds .......................
CH–47 Helicopter ............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess advance procurement ...........................................................................
Multi Sensor ABN Recon [MIP] .......................................................
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances .........
Utility/Cargo Airplane Mods ............................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Unit cost growth ...........
Utility Helicopter Mods ...................................................................
UH–60 A-L Conversions .........................................................
Kiowa Mods Warrior ........................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: CASUP long lead early
to need ..............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: CASUP recapitalization
early to need .....................................................................
Network and Mission Plan ..............................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Production early to
need ...................................................................................

19,730
........................
142,050
........................
518,460
........................
10,772
........................
96,227
........................
1,046,976
........................
98,376

18,052
........................
85,050
........................
518,460
........................
10,150
........................
171,227
........................
1,032,915
........................
82,534

¥1,678
¥1,678
¥57,000
¥57,000
........................
[56,820]
¥622
¥622
∂75,000
∂75,000
¥14,061
¥14,061
¥15,842

........................
12,467
........................
17,500
........................
74,095
........................
184,044

........................
10,467
........................
14,000
........................
84,095
........................
108,282

¥15,842
¥2,000
¥2,000
¥3,500
¥3,500
∂10,000
∂10,000
¥75,762

........................

¥67,856

........................
152,569

........................
144,869

¥7,906
¥7,700

........................

¥7,700

Aerial Common Sensor.—The Army is requesting $142,050,000
for the first year of production of four enhanced medium altitude
reconnaissance and surveillance system [EMARSS] aircraft. The
program has experienced two cost overruns on the development aircraft and has not completed the limited user testing. Therefore, the
Committee recommends reducing the procurement request by
$57,000,000 and two aircraft.
UH–72A Lakota Light Utility Helicopter [LUH].—The budget request includes $96,227,000 to procure 10 UH–72A Lakota Helicopters. The request also proposes ending Lakota production after
the fiscal year 2014 buy and truncating the total program at 315
aircraft instead of the originally planned 346. The UH–72A Lakota
program was established to replace aging UH–1 and OH–58 fleets
which were already years past their directed retirement dates and
to augment the UH–60 fleet which was more costly to procure and
operate than a UH–72A. The Lakota program has achieved cost,
schedule, and performance goals and is a more cost effective approach to performing utility missions than operating aging and
more expensive helicopters; therefore, the Committee does not support program truncation short of the original requirement and provides $171,227,000 to purchase 20 UH–72A Lakota helicopters in
fiscal year 2014.

70
Kiowa Warrior Modifications.—The Army requests $184,044,000
to procure a new cockpit and other modifications. For the last couple of years, the Committee has been encouraging the Army to
focus on the replacement aircraft and only modify the safety issues
associated with this platform. Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of $75,000,000 and directs the remaining
funds to only focus on the approved safety issues, the dual channel
full authority digital engine control system.
RQ–7 Shadow Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and OH–58 Kiowa Warrior Modification Programs.—The RQ–7 unmanned aerial vehicle
modifications total procurement budget from previous years
through fiscal year 2018 is over $2,069,000,000. In addition, the
OH–58 Kiowa Warrior Modifications procurement budget from previous years through fiscal year 2018 is over $2,500,000,000. Given
the scope and size of planned investments, these programs exceed
the threshold for designation as Acquisition Category [ACAT] 1D or
Major Defense Acquisition Programs [MDAPs]. Currently, both programs are classified as lower acquisition category programs, which
receive less Office of the Secretary of Defense [OSD] oversight and
require less justification documentation than MDAPs. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to designate the RQ–7 unmanned aerial vehicle and OH–58 Kiowa Warrior programs and all
of their associated program element investments as single ACAT
1D or MDAPs as defined under chapter 144 of title 10 of United
States Code. All provisions and reporting requirements of such
chapter shall apply to the programs, and any upgrades, improvements or modifications to the RQ–7 or OH–58 platforms shall be
reviewed within the regulatory review process established by the
Secretary of Defense for MDAPs.
In addition, the Committee is concerned over the unlimited modifications to existing systems which causes programs such as Armed
Aerial Scout to continually get deferred until they are eventually
terminated because the Army cannot afford to continually modernize existing systems at the same time they are trying to provide
new capability.
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
2013 1

$1,533,407,000
1,334,083,000
1,277,125,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,277,125,000.
This is $56,958,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

449
988
........................
1,788
2,412
........................

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYSTEM
JAVELIN (AAWS–M) SYSTEM SUMMARY ................................................................................................
TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................
TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY (AP–CY) .....................................................................................................
GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ..........................................................................................................
MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) ..........................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .........................................................................................................

4
5
6
7
8

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF MISSILES ........................................................................................

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
AIR DEFENSE TARGETS .........................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ...................................................................................................
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ...............................................................................................................

16
17
18

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

MODIFICATIONS
PATRIOT MODS .....................................................................................................................................
STINGER MODS .....................................................................................................................................
ITAS/TOW MODS ....................................................................................................................................
MLRS MODS ..........................................................................................................................................
HIMARS MODIFICATIONS .......................................................................................................................

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................................................................

10
11
12
13
14

........................

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES

SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM
MSE MISSILE ........................................................................................................................................

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY

Qty.

OTHER MISSILES

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

3,530
1,748
5,285

11,222

331,366

256,438
37,252
20,000
11,571
6,105

980,932

110,510
49,354
19,965
237,216
19,022

4,464

540,401

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

449
988
........................
1,788
2,412

........................

Qty.

3,530
1,748
5,285

11,222

277,644

202,716
37,252
20,000
11,571
6,105

977,696

110,510
49,354
19,965
233,980
19,022

4,464

540,401

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................

........................

¥53,722

¥53,722
........................
........................
........................
........................

¥3,236

........................
........................
........................
¥3,236
........................

........................

Change from

........................

Qty.

........................
........................

TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................................................................................

Qty.

TOTAL, SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES .......................................................................

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

1,334,083

10,563

2014 budget
estimate

........................

Qty.

1,277,125

10,563

Committee
recommendation

........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

¥56,958

........................

Change from

73
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Guided MLRS Rocket [GMLRS] ...............................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost above
inflation .....................................................................
Patriot Mods ...........................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Reduce Radar
Digital Processors .....................................................

PROCUREMENT

WEAPONS

Committee
recommendation

237,216

233,980

¥3,236

........................
256,438

..........................
202,716

¥3,236
¥53,722

........................

..........................

¥53,722

AND TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES,
ARMY

Change from
budget request

$1,855,371,000
1,597,267,000
1,572,828,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,572,828,000.
This is $24,439,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
18
32
........................
14
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
STRYKER VEHICLE ................................................................................................................................

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
STRYKER (MOD) ....................................................................................................................................
FIST VEHICLE (MOD) .............................................................................................................................
BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) ..................................................................................................................
HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ..................................................................................
PALADIN PIPM MOD IN SERVICE ..........................................................................................................
IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) ..........................................................................
ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) .......................................................................................................................
ARMORED BREACHER VEHICLE ............................................................................................................
M88 FOV MODS ....................................................................................................................................
JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE ........................................................................................................................
M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) .....................................................................................................................
ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM ..............................................................................................................

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV–WTCV) ..........................................................................................

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

14
........................
1,424
........................
5,061
41,897
242
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES ......................................................................................

WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYS FAMILY ....................................................................................
MORTAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................................................................
XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ......................................................................................
CARBINE ...............................................................................................................................................
COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION ...........................................................................
HANDGUN ..............................................................................................................................................

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH
M777 MODS ..........................................................................................................................................
M4 CARBINE MODS ..............................................................................................................................
M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ........................................................................................................
M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS .........................................................................................................

15
18
19
21
23
24

26
27
28
29

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY

Qty.

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

39,300
10,300
33,691
7,608

69,147
5,310
24,049
70,846
56,580
300

1,234,130

1,544

20,522
29,965
158,000
4,769
260,177
111,031
2,500
62,951
28,469
2,002
178,100
........................

374,100

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
5,061
12,000
242
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
18
32
........................
14
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

39,300
10,300
33,691
7,608

........................
5,310
24,049
21,254
56,580
300

1,328,430

1,544

20,522
29,965
158,000
4,769
219,477
111,031
2,500
62,951
28,469
2,002
178,100
90,000

419,100

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................

¥1,424
........................
........................
¥29,897
........................
........................

........................

∂45,000

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................

¥69,147
........................
........................
¥49,592
........................
........................

∂94,300

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
¥40,700
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂90,000

Change from

........................

Qty.

........................

TOTAL, WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES .................................................................

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY ..............................................................................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV–WTCV) .............................................................................................
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV–WTCV) .......................................................................................
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ................................................................................................................
SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) .................................................................................

35
36
37
38

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ...................................................................................................
SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ...........................................................................................................
M119 MODIFICATIONS ..........................................................................................................................
M16 RIFLE MODS .................................................................................................................................
MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV–WTCV) ..............................................................................

30
31
32
33
34

1,597,267

363,137

2,024
10,108
459
1,267

2,719
7,017
18,707
2,136
1,569

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

1,572,828

244,398

2,024
10,108
459
1,267

2,719
7,017
18,707
2,136
1,569

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

¥24,439

¥118,739

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

76
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Stryker Vehicle ..........................................................................
Army Unfunded Requirement: Double-V hull Strykers for
the 3rd BCT .................................................................
Paladin Integrated Management [PIM] ....................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Army requested
transfer to RDT&E, Army (line 114) ...........................
Abrams Upgrade .......................................................................
Maintaining Critical Industrial Base capability:
Abrams ........................................................................
Integrated Air Burst Weapon System Family ...........................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Milestone C slip ..
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer to
RDT&E, Army (line 84) at Army request for corrective
actions .........................................................................
Carbine .....................................................................................
Program termination: Individual Carbine Program .........

PROCUREMENT

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

374,100

419,100

∂45,000

..........................
260,177

..........................
219,477

∂45,000
¥40,700

..........................
..........................

..........................
90,000

¥40,700
∂90,000

..........................
69,147
..........................

..........................
..........................
..........................

∂90,000
¥69,147
¥58,147

..........................
70,846
..........................

..........................
21,254
..........................

¥11,000
¥49,592
¥49,592

AMMUNITION, ARMY

Appropriations, 2013 1 2 .........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................

$1,640,450,000
1,540,437,000
1,454,067,000

1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.
emergency funding of $1,310,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013
(division A of Public Law 113–2).
2 Includes

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,454,067,000.
This is $86,370,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
802
........................

MORTAR AMMUNITION
60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ..................................................................................................................
81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ..................................................................................................................
120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ................................................................................................................

TANK AMMUNITION
CTG TANK 105MM AND 120MM: ALL TYPES ........................................................................................

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
CTG, ARTY, 75MM AND 105MM: ALL TYPES ........................................................................................
ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................................
PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982 ..............................................................................................
ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL TYPES .............................................................

10
11
12

14
15
16
17

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

ROCKETS
SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................................
ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ...........................................................................................................

OTHER AMMUNITION
DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ....................................................................................................
GRENADES, ALL TYPES .........................................................................................................................
SIGNALS, ALL TYPES .............................................................................................................................

20
21

22
23
24

NETWORKED MUNITIONS

MINES

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES .....................................................................................................................
CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES .....................................................................................................................
CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ..................................................................................................................
CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES .....................................................................................................................
CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................................................................
CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................................................................
CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................................................................

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY

Qty.

2
3
4
5
7
8
9

AMMUNITION

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

24,074
33,242
7,609

1,012
108,476

39,825
37,902
67,896
71,205

121,551

38,029
24,656
60,781

112,167
58,571
9,858
80,037
16,496
69,533
55,781

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
802
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

24,074
33,242
7,609

1,012
108,476

39,825
37,902
66,326
71,205

121,551

38,029
24,656
60,781

87,167
53,571
9,858
55,037
6,196
50,033
55,781

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
¥1,570
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................

¥25,000
¥5,000
........................
¥25,000
¥10,300
¥19,500
........................

Change from

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

........................

TOTAL, AMMUNITION ...............................................................................................................

26
27
28
29
30
31
32

33
34
35

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

MISCELLANEOUS
AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES .........................................................................................................
NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES ................................................................................................
CAD/PAD ALL TYPES .............................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............................................................................................................
AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) ...................................................................................
CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES ..........................................................................................................................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .................................................................................................
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION, ALL ............................................................................
ARMS INITIATIVE ...................................................................................................................................

TOTAL, AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ................................................................

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .....................................................................

AMMUNITION PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT

........................

SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ......................................................................................................................

Qty.

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

1,540,437

425,365

242,324
179,605
3,436

1,115,072

16,700
7,366
3,614
12,423
16,604
14,328
108

5,228

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

1,454,067

425,365

242,324
179,605
3,436

1,028,702

16,700
7,366
3,614
12,423
16,604
14,328
108

5,228

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

¥86,370

........................

........................
........................
........................

¥86,370

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Change from

79
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

Ctg, 5.56mm, All Types ..................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Army reported pricing
and usage adjustment ......................................................
CTG, 7.62mm, All Types .................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Army reported pricing
and usage adjustment ......................................................
CTG, .50 Cal, All Types ..................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Army reported pricing
and usage adjustment ......................................................
CTG, 25mm, All Types ....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: XM1083 HEAB not approved for service use ......................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: XM1081 TP not approved for service use ......................................................
CTG, 30mm, All Types ....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Army reported pricing
and usage adjustment ......................................................
Proj 155mm Extended Range M982 ...............................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .............

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

112,167

87,167

¥25,000

........................
58,571

........................
53,571

¥25,000
¥5,000

........................
80,037

........................
55,037

¥5,000
¥25,000

........................
16,496

........................
6,196

¥25,000
¥10,300

........................

¥8,800

........................
69,533

........................
50,033

¥1,500
¥19,500

........................
67,896
........................

........................
66,326
........................

¥19,500
¥1,570
¥1,570

Small Caliber Trace Domestic Second Source.—The Committee is
concerned about the single point failure risk associated with small
caliber traced projectiles. The Committee directs the Secretary of
the Army to conduct a study on the requirements to establish a
fully capable U.S.-based second source for small caliber traced projectiles. The Committee urges the Secretary of the Army to investigate the expansion of existing facilities to maximize previous U.S.
Government investments. The Committee directs the Secretary of
the Army to provide a report and recommendations from this study
to the congressional defense committees within 90 days of enactment of this act.
OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
2013 1

$5,734,087,000
6,465,218,000
6,242,899,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,242,899,000.
This is $222,319,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................
........................
........................
........................

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN ......................................................................................................................
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................................................................
NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER ..........................................................................................................

TOTAL, TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES ............................................................................

14
15
16

2,139
........................
........................
........................
31
........................
........................
........................
........................

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
WIN–T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK ..................................................................................
SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .....................................................................................................
JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY ..........................................................................
JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) ............................................................................................................

COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS .........................................................................
TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................
SHF TERM .............................................................................................................................................
NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) ...............................................................................
SMART–T (SPACE) ................................................................................................................................

18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

25
40
837
........................
220
74
77
746
34
........................

TACTICAL VEHICLES
TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS .........................................................................................................
SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED ......................................................................................................................
FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) ..........................................................................................
FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMEN ........................................................................
FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) ....................................................................................
PLS ESP ................................................................................................................................................
HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV ..........................................................................
TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS ..................................................................................
MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP ..........................................................................................................
MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED MODS .....................................................................................

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY

Qty.

1
2
3
4
5
6
9
11
12
13

TACTICAL AND SUPPORT VEHICLES

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

147,212
7,998
7,232
3,308
13,992

973,477
14,120
7,869
5,296

455,236

400
716
5,619

4,000
6,841
223,910
11,880
14,731
44,252
39,525
51,258
49,904
2,200

2014 budget
estimate

31
........................
........................
........................
........................

2,139
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................

25
40
837
........................
220
74
77
746
34
........................

Qty.

147,212
598
7,232
3,308
13,992

973,477
620
7,869
5,296

505,236

400
716
5,619

4,000
6,841
223,910
11,880
14,731
44,252
39,525
51,258
49,904
52,200

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................
¥7,400
........................
........................
........................

........................
¥13,500
........................
........................

∂50,000

........................
........................
........................

Change from

Qty.

........................
323
........................
1,133
........................
877
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM
CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) .................................................................................................
RESERVE CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................

INFORMATION SECURITY
TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) ....................................................................................................
INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM—ISSP ............................................................................
FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS .......................................................................................................................
COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) ..............................................................................................

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS
BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................................

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS ........................................................................................................................
DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) .....................................................................................................
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .....................................................................
INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM .......................................................................

32
33
34
35
36
37
38
40
41
42
44
45

48
49

50
51
52
53

57
58
59
60

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
JTT/CIBS–M (MIP) .................................................................................................................................
PROPHET GROUND (MIP) ......................................................................................................................

........................
10

........................
10,523
130
........................
........................
2,066
........................
........................
15,967
........................
........................
........................

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) ..............................................................................
JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ...........................................................................................................
MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) .............................................................................
RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) .....................................................................................................
SINCGARS FAMILY ................................................................................................................................
AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2 ...............................................................................................................
TRACTOR DESK .....................................................................................................................................
SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS ...................................................................
TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM .....................................................................
UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE ....................................................................................................................
RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY ..................................................................................................
FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE ......................................................................

64
65

........................

COMM—C3 SYSTEM
ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) ...................................................................................

ELECT EQUIP

94
15

GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS ................................................................................................................
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) ........................................................................................................

28
29

824
59,198

104,577
612
39,000
248,477

43,395

13,890
23,245
3,800
24,711

1,512
61,096

786
382,930
19,200
1,438
9,856
14,184
6,271
1,030
31,868
18,000
1,166
22,867

17,590

28,206
2,778

........................
10

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
1,133
........................
877

........................
323

........................

94
15

824
55,398

104,577
612
39,000
248,477

43,395

13,890
23,245
3,800
24,711

1,512
61,096

........................
382,930
19,200
1,438
........................
14,184
6,271
........................
31,868
18,000
1,166
22,867

17,590

28,206
2,778

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
¥3,800

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

¥786
........................
........................
........................
¥9,856
........................
........................
¥1,030
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

2,717
5
........................
........................
........................
........................
18
........................
........................
........................
........................
86
........................
6,879
........................
........................
1,491
........................
5
........................
........................
........................
3,866
167
120
19
574
167
........................
8

DCGS–A (MIP) ......................................................................................................................................
JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) ..........................................................................................
TROJAN (MIP) ........................................................................................................................................
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) ...........................................................................................
CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL (CHARCS) (MIP) .....................................................................
MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM ........................................................................

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW)
LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR .............................................................................................
EW PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT TOOLS ............................................................................................
ENEMY UAS ..........................................................................................................................................
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES .....................................................................
CI MODERNIZATION (MIP) .....................................................................................................................

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
SENTINEL MODS ...................................................................................................................................
SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) .....................................................................................................
NIGHT VISION DEVICES .........................................................................................................................
LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ...................................................................
NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ...................................................................................................
SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF ...............................................................................
GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM .................................................................................................
INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS ..............................................................................
ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP ...............................................................................................................
PROFILER ..............................................................................................................................................
MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) ....................................................................................
JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC–P) ...................................................................................
MOD OF IN-SERVICE EQUIPMENT (LLDR) .............................................................................................
MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM .........................................................................................................
COUNTERFIRE RADARS .........................................................................................................................

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY ....................................................................................................................
BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM ..........................................................................
FAAD C2 ...............................................................................................................................................
AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS (AMD) ....................................................................

74
75
76
79
80

82
83
84
85
86
87
89
90
91
92
93
94
96
97
98

101
102
103
104

Qty.

67
68
69
70
71
72

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

43,228
14,446
4,607
33,090

47,983
142
202,428
5,183
14,074
22,300
1,016
55,354
800
3,027
1,185
103,214
26,037
23,100
312,727

40,735
13
2,800
1,237
1,399

267,214
9,899
24,598
1,927
6,169
2,924

2014 budget
estimate

574
167
........................
8

86
........................
6,879
........................
........................
1,491
........................
5
........................
........................
........................
3,866
167
120
19

18
........................
........................
........................
........................

2,717
5
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

43,228
14,446
4,607
33,090

35,983
........................
164,928
5,183
10,074
22,300
1,016
55,354
800
3,027
1,185
103,214
26,037
23,100
312,727

40,735
13
2,800
1,237
1,399

267,214
9,899
24,598
1,927
6,169
2,924

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................

¥12,000
¥142
¥37,500
........................
¥4,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Change from

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
16
........................
........................
........................

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION
ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ........................................................................................................
AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................
GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM ................................................................................
HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PROGRAM ..............................................................................................
RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ................................................................................

ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V)
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) ............................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) ...............................................................................

ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C–E) ....................................................................................................
BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ...........................................................................................................

TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT ....................................................

115
116
117
118
120

121
122

123
124

........................
3,759
24,530
2
34
........................
311
........................
........................
6,774
........................
70

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ........................................................................................
BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ...........................................................................................................
CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION ................................................................................................................

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
TACTICAL BRIDGING .............................................................................................................................
TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON .......................................................................................................
COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER RECAP .............................................................................................

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
GROUND STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM (GSTAMIDS) ................................................................
ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................................................................................
EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION ......................................................................................
EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) .....................................................................
REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS ...........................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................

126
127
128

130
131
132

134
135
136
137
138
139

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

........................
........................
........................
2,959
........................
........................
212

IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM ........................................................................................................
LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) .............................................................................................
NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE .......................................................................
MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ..................................................................................................
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM—ARMY .......................................................................................
LOGISTICS AUTOMATION .......................................................................................................................
RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET ........................................................................

105
107
109
110
111
113
114

50,465
6,490
1,563
20,921
100
2,271

14,188
23,101
15,416

762
20,630
22,151

4,266,066

554
20,000

7,440
1,615

11,865
219,431
6,414
62,683
34,951

21,200
1,795
54,327
59,171
83,936
25,476
19,341

311
........................
........................
6,774
........................
70

2
34
........................

........................
3,759
24,530

........................

........................
........................

........................
16

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
2,959
........................
........................
212

42,765
6,490
1,563
20,921
100
2,271

14,188
23,101
15,416

........................
20,630
22,151

4,153,452

554
20,000

7,440
1,615

11,865
196,831
6,414
62,683
34,951

21,200
1,795
54,327
59,171
83,936
25,476
19,341

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

¥7,700
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

¥762
........................
........................

¥112,614

........................
........................

........................
¥22,600
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

464
........................
........................
31,530
5,547
217
6,904
248
289
210
508
3,258
88
25
347

Qty.

........................
52
13
109
84
19
34
109
80
66
........................

Item

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
HEATERS AND ECU’S ............................................................................................................................
LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES .................................................................................................
SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ......................................................................................................................
PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) ..............................................................................
GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM ...................................................................................................................
FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................................
CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM ....................................................................
MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS .............................................................................................................
FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ........................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) .......................................................................................................

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER .................................................................................

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ................................................................................................................
MEDEVAC MISSION EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP) .................................................................................

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS .....................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) ..................................................................................................

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ...............................................................................................
SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING ...................................................................................................................
MISSION MODULES—ENGINEERING .....................................................................................................
HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR .......................................................................................................................
TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED .....................................................................................................................
ALL TERRAIN CRANES ..........................................................................................................................
HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) FOS ...........................................................................
ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP ............................................................................
CONST EQUIP ESP ................................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) ............................................................................................

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT
ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP ......................................................................................................................

140
141
142
143
144
147
148
149
150
151

152

153
154

155
156

157
159
160
162
163
164
166
168
169
170

171

[Dollars in thousands]

38,007

2,000
36,078
9,721
50,122
28,828
19,863
23,465
13,590
16,088
6,850

19,427
3,860

22,042
35,318

60,612

7,269
200
1,468
26,526
81,680
28,096
56,150
3,242
38,141
5,859

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
52
13
109
84
19
34
109
80
66

25
347

3,258
88

508

464
........................
........................
31,530
5,547
217
6,904
248
289
210

Qty.

38,007

2,000
36,078
9,721
50,122
28,828
2,613
19,645
........................
16,088
6,850

19,427
3,860

22,042
35,318

60,612

7,269
200
1,468
26,526
81,680
28,096
44,677
3,242
38,141
5,859

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................

........................

Budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥17,250
¥3,820
¥13,590
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥11,473
........................
........................
........................

Change from

Qty.

1,680,658

309
8,181
15
2
........................
3
1,810
2,105
647
........................
........................
........................
1,936
........................
69
1,597
........................
........................
15
........................
........................
........................

TRAINING EQUIPMENT
COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT ................................................................................................
TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM ..........................................................................................................
CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER .....................................................................................................
AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (AVCA) ......................................................................
GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING .....................................................................

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD)
CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................
INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) ................................................................................
TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) .......................................................................................

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR ...............................................................................................................
RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..............................................................................
PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) .................................................................................................
BASE LEVEL COM’L EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................
MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) ..................................................................................
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) .....................................................................................................
SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING ............................................................................................
AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 ..................................................................................................................
TRACTOR YARD .....................................................................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .....................................................................................

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS
INITIAL SPARES—C&E .........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS .........................................................................................

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ....................................................................................

174
175

176
177
178
179
180

181
182
183

184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192

195

5,110
5,110
62,904
1,427
96,661
2,450
11,593
8,948
8,000

........................
60

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER ...............................................................................................
FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS ..........................................................................................................................

173

6,465,218

3,558

59,700

8,241
67,506
18,755

121,710
225,200
30,063
34,913
9,955

1,250
8,260

129,437

5,239

GENERATORS
GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................

10,605

........................

ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) ................................................................................................

172

........................

647
........................
........................
........................
1,936
........................
69
1,597
........................

3
1,810
2,105

309
8,181
15
2
........................

........................
60

5,239

........................

6,242,899

3,558

29,700

1,550,953

5,110
........................
62,904
1,427
96,661
2,450
11,593
8,948
8,000

8,241
67,506
18,755

61,710
215,200
30,063
34,913
9,955

1,250
8,260

129,437

10,605

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

¥222,319

........................

¥30,000

¥129,705

........................
¥5,110
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

¥60,000
¥10,000
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

86
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

13
19
23
32

40
65

83
84

116

126
134

148

164

166

168
176
177

185

195

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected [MRAP] Mods ........................
Army unfunded requirement: MRAP Mods ...........................
Signal Modernization Program .....................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: program delay .........
Transportable Tactical Command Communications ....................
Restoring acquisition accountability: program delay .........
Army Data Distribution System (DATA RADIO) .............................
Improving funds management: transitioned to
sustainment in fiscal year 2013 ....................................
Sincgars Family ............................................................................
Improving funds management: transitioned to
sustainment in fiscal year 2013 ....................................
Soldier Enhancement Program Comm/Electronics .......................
Reduce duplication ..............................................................
Prophet Ground .............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: hardware unit cost
growth .............................................................................
Sentinel Mods ...............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Mode 5 fielding
delay ................................................................................
Sense Through the Wall [STTW] ...................................................
Program termination: Program previously terminated ........
Night Vision Devices .....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: excessive unit cost
increase ...........................................................................
Night Vision, Thermal Wpn Sight .................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: excessive fielding
support costs ..................................................................
Automated Data Processing Equip ...............................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Integrated Pay and
Personnel System hardware procurement concurrency ..
Family of Non-Lethal Equipment [FNLE] ......................................
Program termination: Program previously terminated ........
Grnd Standoff Mine Detectn Sysm [GSTAMIDS] ...........................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Husky Mounted Detection system late contract award ................................
Cargo Aerial Del & Personnel Parachute System ........................
Budget documentation disparity: risk mitigation unjustified request .....................................................................
All Terrain Cranes .........................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: procurement concurrency ...........................................................................
High Mobility Engineer Excavator [HMEE] ....................................
Maintain program affordability: transfer from HMEE Airborne ...............................................................................
Maintain program affordability: transfer to HMEE Type
1 ......................................................................................
Enhanced Rapid Airfield Construction .........................................
Reduce duplication ..............................................................
Combat Training Centers Support ................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: program delay .........
Training Devices, Nonsystem ........................................................
Improving funds management: unobligated prior year
funds ...............................................................................
Rapid Equipping Soldier Support Equipment ..............................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Rapid Equipping
Force funded in OCO .......................................................
Initial Spares—C&E .....................................................................

2,200
........................
14,120
........................
7,998
........................
786

52,200
........................
620
........................
598
........................
........................

∂50,000
∂50,000
¥13,500
¥13,500
¥7,400
¥7,400
¥786

........................
9,856

........................
........................

¥786
¥9,856

........................
1,030
........................
59,198

........................
........................
........................
55,398

¥9,856
¥1,030
¥1,030
¥3,800

........................
47,983

........................
35,983

¥3,800
¥12,000

........................
142
........................
202,428

........................
........................
........................
164,928

¥12,000
¥142
¥142
¥37,500

........................
14,074

........................
10,074

¥37,500
¥4,000

........................
219,431

........................
196,831

¥4,000
¥22,600

........................
762
........................
50,465

........................
........................
........................
42,765

¥22,600
¥762
¥762
¥7,700

........................
56,150

........................
44,677

¥7,700
¥11,473

........................
19,863

........................
2,613

¥11,473
¥17,250

........................
23,465

........................
19,645

¥17,250
¥3,820

........................

¥14,050

........................
13,590
........................
121,710
........................
225,200

........................
........................
........................
61,710
........................
215,200

∂10,230
¥13,590
¥13,590
¥60,000
¥60,000
¥10,000

........................
5,110

........................
........................

¥10,000
¥5,110

........................
59,700

........................
29,700

¥5,110
¥30,000

87
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

Improving funds management: unobligated prior year
funds ...............................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

........................

¥30,000

Warfighter Integrated Network-Tactical Most Economical Rate.—
The Warfighter Integrated Network-Tactical [WIN–T] Increment 2
is currently in low-rate initial production with a full-rate production decision anticipated in September 2013. Over the past 2 years,
the Committee has been critical of the Army’s budgeting processes
and, specifically, how the Army budgets to buy equipment based on
the number of Army units to receive that particular set of equipment for a given year. While this seems like a reasonable budgeting approach, the Army’s tendency to dramatically fluctuate
equipment purchases year-after-year makes this strategy inefficient and unaffordable. In the case of WIN–T, the Army plans to
procure a large amount of equipment over the next few years.
Under the Army’s current procurement strategy, quantities purchased at the individual piece of equipment level, will fluctuate
year-by-year causing unnecessary price spikes. Therefore, the Committee directs the Army, working with the Office of the Secretary
of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation [OSD CAPE],
to perform a WIN–T business case analysis that defines the specific
equipment needs over the life of the WIN–T Increment 2 program,
and determines the most efficient and economical buying strategy
that also meets the Army’s force generation requirements. Not less
than 15 days after delivery of the President’s fiscal year 2015 budget request, the Army and OSD CAPE shall provide a briefing to the
congressional defense committees on the outcome of the WIN–T
business case analysis.
High Mobility Engineer Excavator Airborne Requirement.—The
Army requests $23,465,000 for 34 High Mobility Engineer Excavators [HMEEs]. Four of these HMEEs are type I which means
they are C–130 and CH–47 transportable. Thirty of these HMEEs
are ‘‘airborne’’ and cost nearly twice as much as the type I. The
Army’s budget request describes the HMEE airborne as ‘‘airdroppable in a C–17.’’ For the authority to procure the HMEE airborne, the Army uses an operational requirements document [ORD]
dated August 15, 2000, which outlines low velocity airdrop as a
threshold requirement for the HMEE airborne. The Committee is
concerned that the Army is using a requirement document that
was approved 13 years ago as justification to procure an HMEE
variant at nearly twice the cost. The Committee directs the Joint
Requirements Oversight Council review the ORD for the HMEE
type I/II for validity given changing joint operational concepts and
the current fiscal climate. Additionally, the Committee reduces the
funding to procure 30 HMEE airborne and restores a portion to
procure 30 additional HMEE type I.
Joint Tactical Radio System [JTRS] Manpack.—The Army requests $323,730,000 for 3,123 Joint Tactical Radio System [JTRS]
manpack units. The Army is currently conducting a full and open
competition to award a 5-year contract to a single vendor. The
JTRS manpack industrial base consists of multiple vendors, who

88
have invested significantly in their manpack products, and are
competing for this contract award. The Committee understands
that the vendors who lose the 5-year JTRS manpack contract
award will likely pull out of the program. When the Army tries to
compete the next JTRS manpack contract award in 5 years, there
will likely be only one vendor left. The future JTRS manpack program will not receive benefit from vendor investment, innovation,
or price competition. Therefore, the Committee directs the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to
review the Army’s manpack competition and contracting plans and
provide, no later than 90 days after enactment of this act, to the
congressional defense committees an assessment of how the objectives of increased savings and performance through competition
over the life of the JTRS manpack program will be achieved.
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $17,359,213,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 17,927,651,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 17,501,539,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,501,539,000.
This is $426,112,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

23
24
25
26

1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

21
........................
........................
4
........................
6
........................
18
........................
25
........................
18
........................
19
........................
16
........................
5
........................
........................

COMBAT AIRCRAFT
EA–18G .................................................................................................................................................
F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP) ...................................................................................................
F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP) (AP–CY) ....................................................................................
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER .........................................................................................................................
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (AP–CY) ...........................................................................................................
JSF STOVL .............................................................................................................................................
JSF STOVL (AP–CY) ..............................................................................................................................
V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) ............................................................................................................................
V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP–CY) ..............................................................................................................
UH–1Y/AH–1Z .......................................................................................................................................
UH–1Y/AH–1Z (AP–CY) ........................................................................................................................
MH–60S (MYP) .....................................................................................................................................
MH–60S (MYP) (AP–CY) .......................................................................................................................
MH–60R ................................................................................................................................................
MH–60R (AP–CY) .................................................................................................................................
P–8A POSEIDON ...................................................................................................................................
P–8A POSEIDON (AP–CY) .....................................................................................................................
E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ............................................................................................................................
E–2D ADV HAWKEYE (AP–CY) ..............................................................................................................

TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT ......................................................................................................

29
........................
2
........................
........................
1

TRAINER AIRCRAFT
JPATS ....................................................................................................................................................

TOTAL, TRAINER AIRCRAFT .....................................................................................................

OTHER AIRCRAFT
KC–130J ...............................................................................................................................................
KC–130J (AP–CY) .................................................................................................................................
RQ–4 UAV (AP–CY) ..............................................................................................................................
MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................................................................................

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY

Qty.

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

134,358
32,288
52,002
60,980

249,080

13,136,712

2,001,787
206,551
........................
1,135,444
94,766
1,267,260
103,195
1,432,573
55,196
749,962
71,000
383,831
37,278
599,237
231,834
3,189,989
313,160
997,107
266,542

2014 budget
estimate

2
........................
........................
1

........................

Qty.

134,358
32,288
4,802
60,980

249,080

12,832,512

1,781,787
206,551
75,000
1,058,744
63,266
1,216,260
103,195
1,432,573
55,196
749,962
71,000
383,831
37,278
599,237
231,834
3,189,989
313,160
997,107
266,542

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
¥47,200
........................

........................

¥304,200

¥220,000
........................
∂75,000
¥76,700
¥31,500
¥51,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Change from

Qty.

29
30
31
32
33
34
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

18,577
48,502
41,575
2,992
875,371
2,127
67,675
135,054
41,706
55,903
37,436
31,044
43,720
902
47,587
665
14,587
189,312
85,537
3,684
98,128
22,999
1,576
6,267
141,685
120,660
3,554
41,800
9,485
14,431

294,586

........................

TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT ........................................................................................................

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
EA–6 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
AEA SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................................................
AV–8 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
ADVERSARY ..........................................................................................................................................
F–18 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
H–46 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
H–53 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
SH–60 SERIES ......................................................................................................................................
H–1 SERIES ..........................................................................................................................................
EP–3 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
P–3 SERIES ..........................................................................................................................................
E–2 SERIES ..........................................................................................................................................
TRAINER A/C SERIES ............................................................................................................................
C–2A .....................................................................................................................................................
C–130 SERIES ......................................................................................................................................
FEWSG ..................................................................................................................................................
CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ...........................................................................................................
E–6 SERIES ..........................................................................................................................................
EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES ........................................................................................................
SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ................................................................................................................
T–45 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
POWER PLANT CHANGES ......................................................................................................................
JPATS SERIES .......................................................................................................................................
AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS ............................................................................................................
COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................................
COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES ..............................................................................................................
COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM ...............................................................................................
ID SYSTEMS ..........................................................................................................................................
P–8 SERIES ..........................................................................................................................................
MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION .....................................................................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

14,958

Qty.

OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT ..................................................................................................................

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

........................

Qty.

18,577
48,502
41,575
2,992
788,076
2,127
67,675
135,054
41,706
77,903
37,436
31,044
32,620
902
47,587
665
14,587
183,218
85,537
13,684
98,128
22,999
1,576
6,267
141,685
120,660
3,554
41,800
9,485
13,431

247,386

14,958

Committee
recommendation

........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................
¥87,295
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂22,000
........................
........................
¥11,100
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥6,094
........................
∂10,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥1,000

¥47,200

........................

Change from

........................

Qty.

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT .......................................................................................

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................
AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................................................................
WAR CONSUMABLES .............................................................................................................................
OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................................................................
SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES ...........................................................

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................................................................

66
67
68
69
70
71

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

MQ–8 SERIES .......................................................................................................................................
RQ–7 SERIES ........................................................................................................................................
V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY .......................................................................................................
F–35 STOVL SERIES .............................................................................................................................
F–35 CV SERIES ...................................................................................................................................

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................................................................

60
61
62
63
64

17,927,651

533,773

410,044
27,450
28,930
5,268
60,306
1,775

1,142,461

2,571,039

1,001
26,433
160,834
147,130
31,100

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

17,501,539

533,773

410,044
27,450
28,930
5,268
60,306
1,775

1,141,238

2,497,550

1,001
26,433
160,834
147,130
31,100

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

¥426,112

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

¥1,223

¥73,489

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

92
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

4
5

6
7

25
33

39
42

49
59

Item

EA–18G ...........................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: excessive unit cost
growth ...............................................................................
Improving funds management: advance procurement appropriated in fiscal year 2013 ..........................................
F/A–18E/F (Fighter) Hornet [AP-CY] ...............................................
Maintaining critical industrial base capability: advance
procurement for 22 F/A–18E/F aircraft ............................
Joint Strike Fighter CV ....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: decrease tooling ........
Restoring acquisition accountability: decrease non-recurring engineering initiatives ...............................................
Joint Strike Fighter CV [AP–CY] .....................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: reduce by 2 aircraft ..
JSF STOVL .......................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: decrease tooling ........
Restoring acquisition accountability: decrease non-recurring engineering initiatives ...............................................
RQ–4 UAV [AP-CY] .........................................................................
Improving funds management: advance procurement appropriated in fiscal year 2013 ..........................................
F–18 Series .....................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: F/A–18E/F and E/A18G ILS excessive growth (OSIP 14-03) ...........................
Restoring acquisition accountability: radome excessive cost
growth (OSIP 002–07) ......................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: retrofit RADARS unjustified cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Infrared Search and
Track (OSIP 04–14) installation early to need .................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Infrared Search and
Track (OSIP 04–14) ILS excess to need ...........................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Infrared Search and
Track (OSIP 04–14) Other Support excess to need ..........
EP–3 Series ....................................................................................
Authorization adjustment: 12th aircraft to Spiral 3 .............
Authorization adjustment: sensor obsolescence ...................
Trainer A/C Series ...........................................................................
Budget documentation disparity: unjustified support cost
growth for Avionics Obsolescence ....................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Avionics Obsolescence
installation cost growth ....................................................
E–6 Series ......................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Family of Advance Beyond Line-of-Sight Terminals program delay ...................
Special Project Aircraft ...................................................................
Authorization adjustment: program office sustainment .......
Authorization adjustment: sensor obsolescence ...................
MAGTF EW for Aviation ...................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Software Reprogrammable Payload—early to need .........................................
Spares and Repair Parts ................................................................
Budget documentation disparity: STUASLO spares excess to
need ...................................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

2,001,787

1,781,787

¥220,000

........................

¥175,000

........................
........................

........................
75,000

¥45,000
∂75,000

........................
1,135,444
........................

........................
1,058,744
........................

∂75,000
¥76,700
¥40,000

........................
94,766
........................
1,267,260
........................

........................
63,266
........................
1,216,260
........................

¥36,700
¥31,500
¥31,500
¥51,000
¥34,000

........................
52,002

........................
4,802

¥17,000
¥47,200

........................
875,371

........................
788,076

¥47,200
¥87,295

........................

¥10,000

........................

¥3,000

........................

¥10,000

........................

¥43,295

........................

¥8,000

........................
55,903
........................
........................
43,720

........................
77,903
........................
........................
32,620

¥13,000
∂22,000
∂8,000
∂14,000
¥11,100

........................

¥7,900

........................
189,312

........................
183,218

¥3,200
¥6,094

........................
3,684
........................
........................
14,431

........................
13,684
........................
........................
13,431

¥6,094
∂10,000
∂5,000
∂5,000
¥1,000

........................
1,142,461

........................
1,141,238

¥1,000
¥1,223

........................

¥1,223

EA–18G Procurement.—The Navy requests $2,001,787,000 for 21
EA–18G aircraft. The Committee understands that the Navy will
procure these aircraft on a single-year contract versus a multi-year

93
contract vehicle. Due to this change in contract type, the Navy
budgeted for a 35-percent unit cost increase over the fiscal year
2013 unit price. The Committee believes this cost growth is excessive and recommends a reduction of $175,000,000.
MQ–8 Fire Scout.—The Committee recommends $60,980,000, the
requested amount, for the MQ–8 Fire Scout. The Committee notes
a sharp decline in the quantity procured from the previous fiscal
year which results in a substantial unit cost increase. The Navy is
encouraged to pursue a more efficient production profile and an innovative acquisition strategy to reduce unit cost. If the Navy is
able to negotiate a reasonable unit cost, the Committee approves
a buy-to-budget procurement of more than one Fire Scout utilizing
fiscal year 2014 funds.
Navy Tactical Aircraft Force Structure.—The F/A–18E/F Super
Hornet continues to be the Navy’s premier carrier asset for force
projection, and it will remain the backbone of the Navy’s tactical
aircraft fleet for the next 25 years. The fiscal year 2014 budget indicates the end of domestic production with the final procurement
of EA–18G Growlers. The Committee is concerned with the decision
to end Super Hornet production and believes a strong carrier-based
fleet is vital to the increased emphasis on the Pacific region. Due
to the delay in fielding the Navy variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, ending the Super Hornet production prematurely creates risk in
the Navy’s strike fighter force structure, and in the Nation’s production capacity and a competitive industrial base. Therefore, the
Committee recommends a $75,000,000 increase for advance procurement of F/A–18 aircraft and expects the Navy to procure additional aircraft in the fiscal year 2015 budget request.
MH–60S and MH–60R Navy Helicopter.—The Committee is
aware that the Navy has identified a number of Seahawk airframe
upgrades that are currently not funded in the out-years but are
critical investments as performance requirements and weight grow
on the aircraft. The MH–60S and MH–60R have been in the fleet
since 2001 and 2006 respectively, and are expected to remain in
service as a critical battle group capability until at least 2030. Investing in their currency and relevancy is important for future
operational effectiveness and success. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Navy to continue investing in improvements for these
aircraft.
WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
2013 1

$3,032,863,000
3,122,193,000
3,107,400,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $3,107,400,000.
This is $14,793,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................
........................

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ...........................................................................................................

TOTAL, BALLISTIC MISSILES ....................................................................................................

196
54
225
328
81
66
363
50
........................
........................
53
143
........................
........................
........................

STRATEGIC MISSILES
TOMAHAWK ...........................................................................................................................................

TACTICAL MISSILES
AMRAAM ...............................................................................................................................................
SIDEWINDER .........................................................................................................................................
JSOW .....................................................................................................................................................
STANDARD MISSILE ..............................................................................................................................
RAM ......................................................................................................................................................
HELLFIRE ..............................................................................................................................................
STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITION ...........................................................................................
AERIAL TARGETS ...................................................................................................................................
OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT .....................................................................................................................

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
ESSM ....................................................................................................................................................
HARM MODS .........................................................................................................................................

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................................................................
FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW–ON ..................................................................................................

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

13
14

15
16

OTHER MISSILES

........................

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
TRIDENT II MODS ..................................................................................................................................

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY

Qty.

BALLISTIC MISSILES

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

84,318

1,138
23,014

76,749
111,902

95,413
117,208
136,794
367,985
67,596
33,916
6,278
41,799
3,538

312,456

1,148,482

7,617

1,140,865

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................

53
143

54
225
328
81
66
363
50
........................
........................

196

........................

Qty.

84,318

1,138
23,014

76,749
111,902

95,413
117,208
136,794
367,985
65,943
33,916
6,278
39,460
3,538

312,456

1,148,482

7,617

1,140,865

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................

........................

Budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
¥1,653
........................
........................
¥2,339
........................

........................

Change from

........................

Qty.

TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .........................................................................................................

150
108
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
MK–46 TORPEDO MODS .......................................................................................................................
MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS ...........................................................................................................
QUICKSTRIKE MINE ...............................................................................................................................

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................
ASW RANGE SUPPORT ..........................................................................................................................

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................

TOTAL, TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT ......................................................................

20
21
22

23
24

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ................................................................................................................

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
CIWS MODS ..........................................................................................................................................
COAST GUARD WEAPONS ......................................................................................................................
GUN MOUNT MODS ...............................................................................................................................
CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS ...................................................................................................
AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS .......................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER WEAPONS ........................................................................................................
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................................................................

TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................................................................

27
28
29
30
32

OTHER WEAPONS

........................
........................

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
SSTD .....................................................................................................................................................
ASW TARGETS .......................................................................................................................................

........................

18
19

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT

3,122,193

174,150
52,632

56,308
10,727
72,901
1,943
19,758

12,513

266,825

3,963

59,730
4,222

125,898
53,203
7,800

3,978
8,031

1,480,104

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

150
108
........................

........................
........................

........................

3,107,400

163,349
52,632

62,708
7,269
59,158
1,943
19,758

12,513

266,825

3,963

59,730
4,222

125,898
53,203
7,800

3,978
8,031

1,476,112

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

¥14,793

¥10,801
........................

∂6,400
¥3,458
¥13,743
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

¥3,992

96
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

27
28

RAM .............................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Guidance and control unit cost efficiencies ..............................................
Aerial Targets .............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: GQM–137 unit cost
efficiencies ....................................................................
CIWS Mods ..................................................................................
Authorization adjustment: Additional RMA kits ................
Coast Guard Weapons ................................................................
Maintain program affordability: Machine gun equipment
cost growth ...................................................................
Gun Mount Mods ........................................................................
Maintain program affordability: MK38 gun kits cost
growth ...........................................................................

PROCUREMENT

Committee
recommendation

67,596

65,943

¥1,653

........................
41,799

........................
39,460

¥1,653
¥2,339

........................
56,308
........................
10,727

........................
62,708
........................
7,269

¥2,339
∂6,400
∂6,400
¥3,458

........................
72,901

........................
59,158

¥3,458
¥13,743

........................

¥13,743

AMMUNITION, NAVY

AND

MARINE CORPS

Change from
budget request

$659,026,000
589,267,000
594,467,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $594,467,000.
This is $5,200,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

15
16
17
18
20
22
23
26
28
29

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ...................................................................................................................
LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES ..............................................................................................................
40MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................................................................
60MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................................................................
120MM, ALL TYPES ..............................................................................................................................
GRENADES, ALL TYPES .........................................................................................................................
ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ...........................................................................................................................
FUZE, ALL TYPES ..................................................................................................................................
AMMO MODERNIZATION ........................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

TOTAL, PROC AMMO, NAVY .....................................................................................................

PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS

Qty.

NAVY AMMUNITION
GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................................................................
AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ..........................................................................................................
MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION .................................................................................................................
PRACTICE BOMBS .................................................................................................................................
CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES ...........................................................................................
AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES ................................................................................................
JATOS ....................................................................................................................................................
LRLAP ...................................................................................................................................................
5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION ...............................................................................................................
INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION .........................................................................................
OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................................................................
SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO ..............................................................................................
PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION ..........................................................................................................
AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..................................................................................................

PROC AMMO, NAVY

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

26,297
6,088
7,644
3,349
13,361
2,149
27,465
26,366
8,403
5,201

462,944

37,703
65,411
20,284
37,870
53,764
67,194
2,749
3,906
24,151
33,080
40,398
61,219
10,637
4,578

2014 budget
estimate

........................

Qty.

26,297
6,088
7,644
3,349
13,361
2,149
27,465
26,366
8,403
10,401

462,944

37,703
65,411
20,284
37,870
53,764
67,194
2,749
3,906
24,151
33,080
40,398
61,219
10,637
4,578

Committee
recommendation

........................

Budget
estimate

........................

Change from

Qty.

........................
........................

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS ..................................................

Qty.

TOTAL, PROC AMMO, MARINE CORPS .....................................................................................

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

589,267

126,323

2014 budget
estimate

........................

Qty.

594,467

131,523

Committee
recommendation

........................

Qty.

Change from

∂5,200

Budget
estimate

99
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Items Less Than $5 Million ............................................................
Marine Corps unfunded requirement: Marine Security Guard
training ammo ..................................................................
Marine Corps unfunded requirement: Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force—Crisis Response .................

SHIPBUILDING

AND

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

5,201

10,401

∂5,200

........................

∂1,000

........................

∂4,200

CONVERSION, NAVY

Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... $15,563,646,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 14,077,804,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 14,420,693,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $14,420,693,000.
This is $342,889,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

16
17
19
20

12
14

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

........................
2
........................
........................
........................
........................
1
........................
4
........................
1
........................
........................
........................
........................
4
........................
........................
........................

OTHER WARSHIPS
CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (AP–CY) .......................................................................................
VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ................................................................................................................
VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE (AP–CY) .................................................................................................
CVN REFUELING OVERHAUL .................................................................................................................
CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS (AP–CY) .................................................................................................
DDG 1000 .............................................................................................................................................
DDG–51 ................................................................................................................................................
DDG–51 (AP–CY) ..................................................................................................................................
LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP .......................................................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER WARSHIPS .......................................................................................................

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE ........................................................................................................
JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL ..................................................................................................................

TOTAL, AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS .....................................................................................................

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR PROGRAM COSTS
MOORED TRAINING SHIP ......................................................................................................................
OUTFITTING ...........................................................................................................................................
LCAC SLEP ............................................................................................................................................
COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS ...................................................................................

TOTAL, AUXILIARIES, CRAFT, AND PRIOR-YEAR PROGRAM .....................................................

TOTAL, SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY .........................................................................

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY

Qty.

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

14,077,804

1,340,850

183,900
450,163
80,987
625,800

526,732

524,000
2,732

12,210,222

944,866
2,930,704
2,354,612
1,705,424
245,793
231,694
1,615,564
388,551
1,793,014

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
4
........................

........................

1
........................

........................

........................
2
........................
........................
........................
........................
1
........................
4

Qty.

14,420,693

1,686,823

207,300
438,136
80,987
960,400

582,032

579,300
2,732

12,151,838

917,553
2,930,704
2,354,612
1,683,353
245,793
231,694
1,615,564
379,551
1,793,014

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

∂342,889

∂345,973

∂23,400
¥12,027
........................
∂334,600

∂55,300

∂55,300
........................

¥58,384

¥27,313
........................
........................
¥22,071
........................
........................
........................
¥9,000
........................

Change from

100

101
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

Carrier Replacement Program ..................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Reduction in
change orders .............................................................
Maintaining program affordability: SEWIP Block 3 excessive cost growth ....................................................
CVN Refueling Overhauls .........................................................
Improving funds management: CVN 72 requirement
previously funded in Fiscal Year 2012 reprogramming ............................................................................
DDG–51 .....................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Flight III Advance
Planning early to need ................................................
Afloat Forward Staging Base ...................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from NDSF,
line 020, for full funding of ASFB #2 only, per Navy
request ........................................................................
Moored Training Ship ...............................................................
Improving funds management: Program shortfall, funds
transferred per Navy request ......................................
Outfitting ..................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: SSN 787&788 outfitting ahead of need ..................................................
Completion of PY Shipbuilding Programs ................................
Improving funds management: JHSV program shortfall,
funds transferred per Navy request ...........................
Authorization adjustment: DDG–51 .................................
Maintain critical industrial base: Virginia class submarine .........................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

944,866

917,553

¥27,313

..........................

¥16,200

..........................
1,705,424

..........................
1,683,353

¥11,113
¥22,071

..........................
388,551

..........................
379,551

¥22,071
¥9,000

..........................
524,000

..........................
579,300

¥9,000
∂55,300

..........................
183,900

..........................
207,300

∂55,300
∂23,400

..........................
450,163

..........................
438,136

∂23,400
¥12,027

..........................
625,800

..........................
960,400

¥12,027
∂334,600

..........................
..........................

∂7,600
∂100,000

..........................

∂227,000

Amphibious-class Warship Construction.—The Committee notes
that the fiscal year 2014 budget request submitted by the Navy,
once again, failed to present a plan to address the amphibious lift
shortfall that exists today. In January 2009, the Navy and Marine
Corps determined a minimum force of 33 ships is the limit of acceptable risk in meeting a 38-ship amphibious warship force requirement. As of now, there are 28 ships in the Navy’s amphibious
fleet, with an average of only 22 ships operationally available at
any given time due to maintenance and overhaul schedules. This
level of assumed risk with amphibious lift capability by the Department of the Navy deeply concerns the Committee. Of particular
concern is the impact it has on the ability of Commanders to meet
operations plans and crisis response requirements, particularly as
instability in the Middle East continues and as the Department of
Defense rebalances its global posture towards the Asia-Pacific region.
The ability to address the amphibious lift shortfall is exacerbated
when the Navy funds only one amphibious class warship in the
current 5-year Future Years Defense Program. This lack of commitment and funding by the Navy will not only have a negative impact
on meeting future operations plans and crisis response requirements, but it will also have a negative industrial base impact and
lead to additional cost growth in multiple shipbuilding programs.

102
Therefore, the Committee directs the Secretary of the Navy to provide a more responsible amphibious warship acquisition plan to
Congress with the fiscal year 2015 budget submission.
DDG–51 Destroyer.—The Committee understands that the DDG–
51 program has a $304,000,000 shortfall due to prior year sequestration reductions, and recommends an additional $100,000,000 for
the DDG–51 to allow the Navy to award the tenth DDG–51 under
the current multi-year procurement contract, as previously authorized and appropriated. The Committee understands that its fiscal
year 2014 shipbuilding recommendations create an outyear asset
for the Navy to apply to shortfalls.
Joint High Speed Vessel.—The Committee recommends that the
Navy continue to explore missions and projects that leverage the
flexibility of the Joint High Speed Vessel [JHSV] and extend the
mission envelope beyond in-theatre transport, including considering
the addition of an unmanned aerial system and air surveillance capability to the JHSV.
OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
2013 1

$5,947,219,000
6,310,257,000
6,058,377,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,058,377,000.
This is $251,880,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
LM–2500 GAS TURBINE .......................................................................................................................
ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE ................................................................................................................
HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) ...........................................................................................................

GENERATORS
SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E ...............................................................................................................

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................

PERISCOPES
SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP ...................................................................................................

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
DDG MOD ..............................................................................................................................................
FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................................
COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD ............................................................................................
LHA/LHD MIDLIFE ..................................................................................................................................
LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE ...................................................................................................
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................
SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................................
VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................
LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................
SUBMARINE BATTERIES ........................................................................................................................
LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................
STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ...............................................................................................
DSSP EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................................
CG–MODERNIZATION ............................................................................................................................
LCAC .....................................................................................................................................................
UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............................................................................................................
CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS ........................................................................................................

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY

Qty.

1
2
3

SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

285,994
14,389
2,436
12,700
40,329
19,603
8,678
74,209
47,078
37,000
25,053
12,986
2,455
10,539
14,431
36,700
119,902
3,678

52,515

39,509

19,782

10,180
5,536
16,956

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
........................

Qty.

208,374
14,389
2,436
12,700
37,329
18,290
8,678
74,209
47,078
37,000
25,053
12,986
2,455
10,539
14,431
36,700
119,902
3,678

52,515

39,509

19,782

10,180
5,536
3,956

Committee
recommendation

........................

Budget
estimate

¥77,620
........................
........................
........................
¥3,000
¥1,313
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
¥13,000

Change from

........................
........................
........................

Qty.

103

SMALL BOATS
STANDARD BOATS .................................................................................................................................

TRAINING EQUIPMENT
OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
OPERATING FORCES IPE .......................................................................................................................

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS ........................................................................................................................
LCS MODULES ......................................................................................................................................
LCS MCM MISSION MODULES ..............................................................................................................
LCS SUW MISSION MODULES ...............................................................................................................

LOGISTICS SUPPORT
LSD MIDLIFE .........................................................................................................................................

TOTAL, SHIPS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................

32
33
34
35

SHIP SONARS
SPQ–9B RADAR ....................................................................................................................................
AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM ............................................................................................
SSN ACOUSTICS ....................................................................................................................................
UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................
SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS ................................................................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC ...........................................................................................................

SHIP RADARS
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

OCEAN ENGINEERING
DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................................

38
39
40
41
42
43

........................

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
REACTOR COMPONENTS .......................................................................................................................

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

........................

SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM ....................................................................................................

Qty.

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

27,934
83,231
199,438
9,394
12,953
8,958

1,685,740

77,974

106,328
45,966
59,885
37,168

69,368

36,145

36,452

8,780

286,744

8,292

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

27,934
83,231
197,852
9,394
12,953
8,958

1,549,240

77,974

106,328
45,966
59,885
19,481

49,868

36,145

32,072

8,780

286,744

8,292

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
¥1,586
........................
........................
........................

¥136,500

........................

........................
........................
........................
¥17,687

¥19,500

........................

¥4,380

........................

Change from

........................

Qty.

104

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM ...........................................................................................
SSTD .....................................................................................................................................................
FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .............................................................................................................
SURTASS ...............................................................................................................................................
TACTICAL SUPPORT CENTER ................................................................................................................

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT
AN/SLQ–32 ...........................................................................................................................................

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT .......................................................................................................................
AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) .........................................................................................

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT
SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG ............................................................................................

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY .............................................................................................
TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) .................................................................................................
NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) .....................................................................
ATDLS ...................................................................................................................................................
NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) ................................................................................
MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ..............................................................................................
SHALLOW WATER MCM .........................................................................................................................
NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) ......................................................................................................
ARMED FORCES RADIO AND TV ...........................................................................................................
STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ...............................................................................................

TRAINING EQUIPMENT
OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
MATCALS ...............................................................................................................................................
SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ......................................................................................................
AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ..............................................................................................
NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM .............................................................................................................
AIR STATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................
MICROWAVE LANDING SYSTEM .............................................................................................................
ID SYSTEMS ..........................................................................................................................................
TAC A/C MISSION PLANNING SYS (TAMPS) ..........................................................................................

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONT ...........................................................................................

44
45
46
47
48

50
51

53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62

64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71

3,249

7,461
9,140
20,798
19,754
8,909
13,554
38,934
14,131

53,644

34,692
396
15,703
3,836
7,201
54,400
8,548
11,765
6,483
7,631

49,475

123,656
896

203,375

24,077
11,925
94,338
9,680
18,130

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

3,249

7,461
9,140
20,798
19,754
8,909
13,554
38,934
14,131

53,644

34,692
396
15,703
3,836
7,201
54,400
8,548
11,765
6,483
7,631

49,475

123,656
896

178,075

20,937
3,625
94,338
9,680
18,130

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

¥25,300

¥3,140
¥8,300
........................
........................
........................

105

TADIX–B ................................................................................................................................................
GCCS–M EQUIPMENT TACTICAL/MOBILE ..............................................................................................
DCGS–N ................................................................................................................................................
CANES ...................................................................................................................................................
RADIAC .................................................................................................................................................
CANES–INTELL ......................................................................................................................................
GPETE ...................................................................................................................................................
INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY ...............................................................................................
EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION ........................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............................................................................................................

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION ..................................................................................................
COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M ................................................................................................

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS
SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT ......................................................................................................
SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ..........................................................................................

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ...............................................................................................
NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) .....................................................................................................

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT .....................................................................................................
ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS .............................................................................................................

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) .........................................................................................
MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM ...........................................................................................................

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP ..............................................................................................

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................................

TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT ....................................................

84
86

87
88

89
90

91
92

94
95

Qty.

73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

2,290,055

2,893

12,251

133,530
1,000

4,463
778

27,381
215,952

7,856
74,376

23,877
28,001

11,646
18,189
17,350
340,567
9,835
59,652
6,253
4,963
4,664
66,889

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................

Qty.

2,232,112

2,893

12,251

133,530
1,000

4,463
778

27,381
215,952

7,856
74,376

23,877
28,001

11,646
18,189
17,350
325,340
9,835
55,262
6,253
4,963
4,664
66,889

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................

Budget
estimate

¥57,943

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
¥15,227
........................
¥4,390
........................
........................
........................
........................

Change from

Qty.

106

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..............................................................................................
EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ...................................................................................................................
AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................
AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT .....................................................................................
METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT .............................................................................................................
OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT .....................................................................................................
AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT .......................................................................................................................
AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES ..................................................................................................
LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................
PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS .......................................................................................
OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................
AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS) .........................................................................

TOTAL, AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................

100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM ..........................................................................................................
GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT ..........................................................................................................

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
NATO SEASPARROW ..............................................................................................................................
RAM GMLS ............................................................................................................................................
SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM ...............................................................................................................
AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................................
TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................
VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS ................................................................................................................
MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM–MIPS ...............................................................................

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ...................................................................................................

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................................................................
SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..............................................................................................
SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................
ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................

112
113

114
115
116
117
118
119
120

121

122
123
124
125

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

........................

SONOBUOYS
SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES ....................................................................................................................

AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

85,678
3,913
3,909
28,694

224,484

58,368
491
51,858
59,757
71,559
626
2,779

1,188
4,447

502,935

55,279
8,792
11,364
59,502
19,118
1,425
29,670
101,554
18,293
7,969
5,215
4,827

179,927

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

85,678
3,913
3,909
28,694

224,484

58,368
491
51,858
59,757
71,559
626
2,779

1,188
4,447

487,435

55,279
8,792
11,364
59,502
19,118
1,425
29,670
86,054
18,293
7,969
5,215
4,827

179,927

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

¥15,500

........................

107

77,018

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................................................

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................
OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................
SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS ..................................................................................................

TOTAL, SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................

144

140
141
142
143

TRAINING DEVICES
TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................

........................

5,600
3,717
10,881
14,748
5,540
5,741
3,852
25,757
1,182

PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

787,116

........................

TOTAL, ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..............................................................................

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................................................................
GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS ................................................................................................................
CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP ..............................................................................................
FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................................
TACTICAL VEHICLES ..............................................................................................................................
AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................................
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................
ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION ...................................................................................................................
PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES ............................................................................................................

131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139

62,361
41,813
26,672

........................
........................
........................

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE
ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM .....................................................................................................
SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS .......................................................................................................
SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ..................................................................................................

128
129
130

22,527

48,966

14,250
6,401
5,718
22,597

46,586
11,933

........................
........................

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP .............................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............................................................................................................

126
127

2014 budget
estimate

Qty.

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

Qty.

22,527

34,716

........................
6,401
5,718
22,597

70,095

5,600
3,717
10,881
14,748
5,540
........................
3,852
25,757
........................

787,116

62,361
41,813
26,672

46,586
11,933

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................

¥14,250

¥14,250
........................
........................
........................

¥6,923

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥5,741
........................
........................
¥1,182

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

Change from

........................
........................

Qty.

108

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .........................................................................................................
EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................................
MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................
NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................
OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..........................................................................................
C4ISR EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................................................
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT .........................................................................................................
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................

TOTAL, PERSONNEL AND COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................................................................

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY .....................................................................................

145
146
147
149
151
152
153
154
155

157

6,310,257

12,140

589,053
317,234

50,428
2,292
4,925
3,202
24,294
4,287
18,276
134,495
324,327

........................

........................
........................

6,058,377

12,140

568,289
317,234

50,428
2,292
4,925
........................
11,019
........................
18,276
134,495
324,327

........................

........................
........................

¥251,880

........................

¥20,764
........................

........................
........................
........................
¥3,202
¥13,275
¥4,287
........................
........................
........................

109

110
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

3
7
11
12
29
31
35

107

136
139
140
149
151
152

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Hybrid Electric Drive [HED] ..................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Contract delay
DDG Mod ...............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: No funds for
Flight IIA DDG 79 ....................................................
LCC 19/20 Extended Service Life Program ..........................
Improving funds management: Air Search Radar installation funding ahead of need ...........................
Pollution Control Equipment .................................................
Improving funds management: Prior years underexecution .................................................................
Standard Boats .....................................................................
Improving funds management: CNIC force protection
medium contract delay ...........................................
Operating Forces IPE ............................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Emergent Repair Facility Navy-identified excess to requirement
LCS SUW Mission Modules ...................................................
Improving funds management: Gun module contract
delay ........................................................................
Program termination: Irregular Warfare Module .........
SSN Acoustics .......................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: SA106 hull sensors low cost conformal array kits cost growth .....
Submarine Acoustic Warfare System ...................................
Improving funds management: CSA MK3 engineering
change growth ........................................................
SSTD ......................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: AN/SLQ–25C
ahead of need .........................................................
AN/SLQ–32 ............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess to requirement ................................................................
CANES ...................................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess DDG–51
afloat installation funding ......................................
CANES–Intell .........................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess DDG–51
afloat installation funding ......................................
Airborne Mine Countermeasures ...........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: AN/AQS–24C
upgrade kits early to need .....................................
Amphibious Equipment .........................................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...
Physical Security Vehicles ....................................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...
Materials Handling Equipment .............................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...
Naval MIP Support Equipment .............................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...
Operating Forces Support Equipment ..................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...
C4ISR Equipment ..................................................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...

16,956
..........................
285,994

3,956
..........................
208,374

¥13,000
¥13,000
¥77,620

..........................
40,329

..........................
37,329

¥77,620
¥3,000

..........................
19,603

..........................
18,290

¥3,000
¥1,313

..........................
36,452

..........................
32,072

¥1,313
¥4,380

..........................
69,368

..........................
49,868

¥4,380
¥19,500

..........................
37,168

..........................
19,481

¥19,500
¥17,687

..........................
..........................
199,438

..........................
..........................
197,852

¥13,272
¥4,415
¥1,586

..........................
24,077

..........................
20,937

¥1,586
¥3,140

..........................
11,925

..........................
3,625

¥3,140
¥8,300

..........................
203,375

..........................
178,075

¥8,300
¥25,300

..........................
340,567

..........................
325,340

¥25,300
¥15,227

..........................
59,652

..........................
55,262

¥15,227
¥4,390

..........................
101,554

..........................
86,054

¥4,390
¥15,500

..........................
5,741
..........................
1,182
..........................
14,250
..........................
3,202
..........................
24,294
..........................
4,287
..........................

¥15,500
¥5,741
¥5,741
¥1,182
¥1,182
¥14,250
¥14,250
¥3,202
¥3,202
¥13,275
¥13,275
¥4,287
¥4,287

Destroyer Modernization.—The fiscal year 2014 budget request
includes $285,994,000 for continued modernization of DDG–51 Destroyers. While the requested funding is consistent with prior year

111
efforts, the Committee notes that the Navy proposes to change its
Destroyer modernization strategy. Instead of continuing with its
original strategy of working through the inventory of oldest ships,
the Navy intends to begin modernizing the newer, Flight IIA Destroyers beginning in fiscal year 2016. The intent of the modernization program is to increase the service life of the Destroyers and
modernize their combat capabilities. The Committee questions this
revised strategy and believes that the older Flight I and II Destroyers should continue to be the focus of the Navy’s modernization
program in order to ensure their operational readiness throughout
their projected service lives. Therefore, the Committee recommends
fully funding the modernization of DDG 60 and DDG 74 as requested, but recommends no funds for DDG 79, the first Flight IIA
Destroyer proposed for modernization. Further, the Committee encourages the Navy to return to its previous Destroyer modernization strategy of older ships in future budget submissions.
PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
2013 1

$1,409,548,000
1,343,511,000
1,325,407,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,325,407,000.
This is $18,104,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS
EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ..............................................................................................
155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER .............................................................................................
HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM .......................................................................................
WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION ......................................................................

OTHER SUPPORT
MODIFICATION KITS ..............................................................................................................................
WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................................................................

TOTAL, WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES .............................................................................

3
4
5
6

7
8

........................
........................

OTHER SUPPORT
MODIFICATION KITS ..............................................................................................................................

TOTAL, GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT ............................................................................

........................
........................

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER .............................................................................................................

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .............................................................................................................

COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT

........................
219
........................

GUIDED MISSILES
GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE .............................................................................................................
JAVELIN .................................................................................................................................................
ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM—HEAVY (AAWS–H) ..........................................................................

9
10
12

GUIDED MISSILES AND EQUIPMENT

........................
........................

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
AAV7A1 PIP ...........................................................................................................................................
LAV PIP .................................................................................................................................................

Qty.

1
2

WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

41,063

16,273

87,000

33,976

15,713
36,175
1,136

111,608

38,446
4,734

589
3,655
5,467
20,354

32,360
6,003

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
219
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

Qty.

41,063

16,273

83,102

30,078

15,713
36,175
1,136

111,608

38,446
4,734

589
3,655
5,467
20,354

32,360
6,003

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................

¥3,898

........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

Change from

........................
........................

Qty.

112

........................
........................
........................
25
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

COMMAND AND CONTROL
ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................................................................................
AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS .............................................................................................................

RADAR ∂ EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
RADAR SYSTEMS ..................................................................................................................................
RQ–21 UAS ...........................................................................................................................................

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................
INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................
RQ–11 UAV ...........................................................................................................................................
DCGS–MC .............................................................................................................................................

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................................

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES .......................................................................................................
COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ...................................................................................................................
RADIO SYSTEMS ...................................................................................................................................
COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................................................................
COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ........................................................................................

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT ....................................................

18
19

20
21

22
23
26
27

29
30
31
32
33

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES ...................................................................................................
COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES ...........................................................................................................

TACTICAL VEHICLES
5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) .................................................................................................................
MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................
FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ............................................................................................................

OTHER SUPPORT
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............................................................................................................

34
35

36
37
40

SUPPORT VEHICLES

........................

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................................................................................................

7,016

36,333
3,137
27,385

1,039
31,050

710,818

5,659

121,955
83,294
74,718
47,613
19,573

6,171

3,749
75,979
1,653
9,494

114,051
66,612

1,637
18,394

2,930

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
25

........................
........................

........................

10,616

36,204
3,137
27,385

1,039
31,050

693,174

5,659

119,173
83,294
74,718
47,613
19,573

6,162

3,749
75,979
1,653
9,494

99,198
66,612

1,637
18,394

2,930

........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

∂3,600

¥129
........................
........................

........................
........................

¥17,644

........................

¥2,782
........................
........................
........................
........................

¥9

........................
........................
........................
........................

¥14,853
........................

........................
........................

........................

113

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT ..........................................................................................
BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT .....................................................................................................................
TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS .....................................................................................................................
POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ............................................................................................................
AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................
EOD SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................................................

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT .........................................................................................................
GARRISON MOBILE ENGR EQUIP ..........................................................................................................
MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP .................................................................................................................
FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................

GENERAL PROPERTY
FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................
TRAINING DEVICES ...............................................................................................................................
CONTAINER FAMILY ..............................................................................................................................
FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................
RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN ...............................................................................................................

OTHER SUPPORT
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .............................................................................................................

TOTAL, ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT ............................................................................
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................................................................

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS .................................................................................

48
49
50
51

52
53
54
55
56

........................

Qty.

42
43
44
45
46
47

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT

TOTAL, SUPPORT VEHICLES ....................................................................................................

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

1,343,511

314,425
13,700

6,525

23,129
8,346
1,857
36,198
2,390

16,809
3,408
48,549
190

14,377
24,864
21,592
61,353
4,827
40,011

105,960

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

1,325,407

314,392
13,700

6,525

23,129
8,346
1,824
36,198
2,390

16,809
3,408
48,549
190

14,377
24,864
21,592
61,353
4,827
40,011

109,431

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

∂3,471

Budget
estimate

¥18,104

¥33
........................

........................

........................
........................
¥33
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Change from

114

115
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

29
36
41

Item

MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: TOW Unit Cost
Growth .........................................................................
RADAR SYSTEMS .......................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Previously Funded
EDM Refurbishment ....................................................
NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT ........................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Squad Thermal Systems ............................................................................
COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ...........................................
Maintaining program affordability: Laptop Cost Growth
5/4 TRUCK HMMWV ..................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Cargo XLWB ............
ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION .................................................
Marine Corps unfunded requirement: Marine Security
Guard Expansion—Armored Vehicles .........................
CONTAINER FAMILY ...................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: JMIC Price Disparity

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

33,976

30,078

¥3,898

........................
114,051

........................
99,198

¥3,898
¥14,853

........................
6,171

........................
6,162

¥14,853
¥9

........................
121,955
........................
36,333
........................
7,016

........................
119,173
........................
36,204
........................
10,616

¥9
¥2,782
¥2,782
¥129
¥129
∂3,600

........................
1,857
........................

........................
1,824
........................

∂3,600
¥33
¥33

Small Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System [STUAS]/RQ–21
UAS.—The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $66,612,000 to
begin full rate of production of the RQ–21 aircraft. The Committee
approves the President’s request but remains concerned about the
long-term affordability of the system. In Senate Report 112–196,
the Committee indicated concern with the lack of a capability development document, concurrency, and lack of approval to enter
production. Since then, the Marine Corps has approved production,
testing has been ongoing, and most of the concurrency has been
mitigated. To ensure future affordability, the Committee encourages the Marine Corps to establish a target price curve for future
production lots, continue lean manufacturing processes, and continue to identify savings in future contract awards.
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... $11,758,481,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 11,398,901,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 10,917,270,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,917,270,000.
This is $481,631,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................

TOTAL, COMBAT AIRCRAFT ......................................................................................................

........................

TOTAL, AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT .......................................................................................................

3
6
41
5
........................
12
........................

HELICOPTERS
CV–22 OSPREY .....................................................................................................................................

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C ..........................................................................................................................

OTHER AIRCRAFT
TARGET DRONES ...................................................................................................................................
AC–130J ...............................................................................................................................................
RQ–4 UAV .............................................................................................................................................
MQ–9 ....................................................................................................................................................
RQ–4 BLOCK 40 PROC .........................................................................................................................

20
22
24
27
28

OTHER AIRCRAFT

6
........................
1
........................
4
........................

OTHER AIRLIFT
C–130J .................................................................................................................................................
C–130J ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ...............................................................................................
HC–130J ...............................................................................................................................................
HC–130J ...............................................................................................................................................
MC–130J ...............................................................................................................................................
MC–130J ...............................................................................................................................................

TACTICAL AIRLIFT

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT

19
........................

TACTICAL FORCES
F–35 .....................................................................................................................................................
F–35 (AP–CY) .......................................................................................................................................

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

Qty.

5
6
7
8
9
10

1
2

COMBAT AIRCRAFT

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

138,669
470,019
27,000
272,217
1,747

2,541

230,798

1,413,072

537,517
162,000
132,121
88,000
389,434
104,000

3,424,553

3,060,770
363,783

2014 budget
estimate

41
5
........................
12
........................

........................

6
........................
1
........................
4
........................

........................

19
........................

Qty.

138,669
470,019
11,000
272,217
1,747

10,200

230,798

1,413,072

537,517
162,000
132,121
88,000
389,434
104,000

3,226,553

2,911,270
315,283

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

¥198,000

¥149,500
¥48,500

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
¥16,000
........................
........................

∂7,659

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Change from

........................
........................

Qty.

116

TOTAL, OTHER AIRCRAFT ........................................................................................................

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
B–2A .....................................................................................................................................................
B–1B ....................................................................................................................................................
B–52 .....................................................................................................................................................
LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ...............................................................................

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
A–10 .....................................................................................................................................................
F–15 .....................................................................................................................................................
F–16 .....................................................................................................................................................
F–22A ...................................................................................................................................................
F–35 MODIFICATIONS ...........................................................................................................................

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
C–5 .......................................................................................................................................................
C–5M ....................................................................................................................................................
C–17A ...................................................................................................................................................
C–21 .....................................................................................................................................................
C–32A ...................................................................................................................................................
C–37A ...................................................................................................................................................

TRAINER AIRCRAFT
GLIDER MODS .......................................................................................................................................
T6 .........................................................................................................................................................
T–1 .......................................................................................................................................................
T–38 .....................................................................................................................................................

OTHER AIRCRAFT
U–2 MODS ............................................................................................................................................
KC–10A (ATCA) .....................................................................................................................................
C–12 .....................................................................................................................................................
MC–12W ...............................................................................................................................................
C–20 MODS ..........................................................................................................................................
VC–25A MOD ........................................................................................................................................
C–40 .....................................................................................................................................................
C–130 ...................................................................................................................................................
C130J MODS .........................................................................................................................................
C–135 ...................................................................................................................................................
COMPASS CALL MODS ..........................................................................................................................

33
34
35
36
37

38
39
42
43
44
45

47
48
49
50

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
61
62
63

........................

29
30
31
32

MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT

45,591
70,918
1,876
5,000
192
263
6,119
58,577
10,475
46,556
34,494

128
6,427
277
28,686

2,456
1,021,967
143,197
103
9,780
452

47,598
354,624
11,794
285,830
157,777

20,019
132,222
111,002
27,197

1,142,991

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

45,591
57,454
1,876
5,000
192
263
6,119
58,577
10,475
4,526
34,494

128
6,427
277
28,686

2,456
919,717
143,197
103
9,780
452

47,598
354,624
11,794
285,830
157,777

20,019
121,222
99,145
27,197

1,134,650

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
¥13,464
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥42,030
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
¥102,250
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
¥11,000
¥11,857
........................

¥8,341

117

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE AIRCRAFT .....................................................................

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ............................................................................................................

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ......................................................................

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ..........................................................................................

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
B–1 .......................................................................................................................................................
B–2A .....................................................................................................................................................
B–52 .....................................................................................................................................................
C–17A ...................................................................................................................................................
C–135 ...................................................................................................................................................
F–15 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT ......................................................................................................
F–16 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT ......................................................................................................
F–22A ...................................................................................................................................................

81
83
84
87
89
90
91
92

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES

RC–135 ................................................................................................................................................
E–3 .......................................................................................................................................................
E–4 .......................................................................................................................................................
E–8 .......................................................................................................................................................
H–1 .......................................................................................................................................................
H–60 .....................................................................................................................................................
RQ–4 UAV MODS ..................................................................................................................................
HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................
OTHER AIRCRAFT ..................................................................................................................................
MQ–1 MODS .........................................................................................................................................
MQ–9 MODS .........................................................................................................................................
RQ–4 GSRA/CSRA MODS ......................................................................................................................
CV–22 MODS ........................................................................................................................................

Qty.

64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
76
77

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

3,683
43,786
7,000
81,952
8,597
2,403
3,455
5,911

49,140

463,285

3,315,129

171,813
197,087
14,304
57,472
6,627
27,654
9,313
16,300
6,948
9,734
102,970
30,000
23,310

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

3,683
43,786
7,000
81,952
8,597
2,403
3,238
5,911

49,140

463,285

3,040,056

171,813
142,615
14,304
57,472
6,627
27,654
9,313
16,300
6,948
9,734
62,970
30,000
23,310

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥217
........................

........................

¥275,073

........................
¥54,472
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥40,000
........................
........................

Change from

Qty.

118

........................
........................

WAR CONSUMABLES
WAR CONSUMABLES .............................................................................................................................

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................................................................

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES. ......................................................

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......................................................................

DARP

........................

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ................................................................................................................

11,398,901

75,845

1,564,026

1,242,004

94,947

21,148

........................

10,917,270

75,845

1,563,809

1,242,004

94,947

21,148

........................

¥481,631

........................

¥217

........................

119

120
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2
17
24

30
31

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

F–35 ............................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: decrease tooling ....
Restoring acquisition accountability: decrease non-recurring engineering initiatives ...........................................
F–35 Advance Procurement ........................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: reduce by 4 aircraft
Civil Air Patrol A/C .....................................................................
Program increase ...............................................................
RQ–4 ...........................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Production closeout
early to need .................................................................
B–1B ...........................................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess carryover .............
B–52 ...........................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: 1760 IWBU delay ...
Restoring acquisition accountability: Anti-skid replacement delay ....................................................................
C–5M ..........................................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Excessive kit and installation cost growth ...................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Change orders unjustified growth .............................................................
KC–10A [ATCA] ...........................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Installation funding
for CNS/ATM kits not procured .....................................
C–135 .........................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Block 45 program
delays ............................................................................
E–3 .............................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Block 40/45 program adjustment ..........................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Block 40/45 installation ahead of need ....................................................
MQ–9 Mods .................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Anti-ice production
concurrency ...................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Lynx radar early to
need ...............................................................................
F–16 ............................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Production line
shutdown .......................................................................

3,354,170
........................

3,204,670
........................

¥149,500
¥78,000

........................
363,783
........................
2,541
........................
27,000

........................
315,283
........................
10,200
........................
11,000

¥71,500
¥48,500
¥48,500
∂7,659
∂7,659
¥16,000

........................
132,222
........................
111,002
........................

........................
121,222
........................
99,145
........................

¥16,000
¥11,000
¥11,000
¥11,857
¥5,120

........................
1,197,767

........................
1,095,517

¥6,737
¥102,250

........................

¥63,250

........................
70,918

........................
57,454

¥39,000
¥13,464

........................
46,556

........................
4,526

¥13,464
¥42,030

........................
197,087

........................
142,615

¥42,030
¥54,472

........................

¥30,930

........................
102,970

........................
62,970

¥23,542
¥40,000

........................

¥5,520

........................
3,455

........................
3,238

¥34,480
¥217

........................

¥217

F–35 Conventional Take-off and Landing Total Quantities.—During the Committee’s hearing to review the Joint Strike Fighter
budget for fiscal year 2014, the Committee was informed that the
Air Force’s planned F–35 procurement quantity of 1,763 aircraft is
based on a one-for-one replacement of legacy aircraft. While the F–
35 will provide the Air Force with much greater fifth generation
fighter capability for certain future threats, less capable aircraft
may be effective and more cost-effective to operate and maintain in
other less contentious scenarios. The Committee believes that given
these times of fiscal austerity, the Department of Defense should
review the Air Force tactical fighter force mix. The Committee directs the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in conjunction
with the Air Force Chief of Staff, to deliver not later than 180 days

121
after enactment of this act, to the congressional defense committees
an analysis that outlines the appropriate total quantity of Air
Force fifth generation and less capable aircraft based on the anticipated threat during the next 30 years.
Air Force Missile Range Support and Security.—The fiscal year
2014 budget request includes no funds for replacement of the previously terminated Common Vertical Lift Support Platform
[CVLSP], leaving the Committee concerned that the Air Force’s
number one priority to sustain an effective nuclear deterrent is not
being sufficiently supported. As outlined by the Defense Science
Board [DSB] Standing Task Force on Nuclear Weapons Surety,
failures continue in fundamental areas, impacting the field forces
and the replacement or upgrade of old equipment. The lack of urgency in replacing equipment following the fiscal year 2013 CVLSP
termination at the request of the Air Force results in the reliance
on outdated, inadequate, and obsolete 40-year-old UH–1N helicopters that cannot meet full mission requirements, and operate
under waivers to support crews and logistics at the ballistic missile
bases.
Replacement of these aged platforms does not require a significant new technological development program, instead the UH–1N
shortfalls in speed, range and endurance could be remedied
through the procurement of in-service, in-production aircraft at
lower cost and less acquisition risk to the Government. This alternative acquisition approach could compare favorably to the continued cost of sustaining the UH–1N, while providing significantly enhanced performance and mission capability. Therefore, the Committee believes the Department of Defense through the Air Force
should leverage existing production capacity and submit a program
for the replacement of UH–1N fleet in the fiscal year 2015 budget
submission.
C–130 Modernization.—The Committee notes the Air Force’s initiatives to reduce fuel consumption across its fleet, including flight
and durability tests of propulsion upgrades to the legacy C–130
fleet. In the fiscal year 2014 budget request, the Air Force requested, and the Committee approved, multiyear procurement authority for new C–130J aircraft. However, since the Air Force plans
to operate over 200 legacy C–130H aircraft until the year 2040, the
Committee urges the Air Force to consider upgrades to these aircraft to help achieve fuel efficiency goals, to include comprehensive
propulsion upgrades.
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$4,955,827,000
5,343,286,000
5,178,486,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,178,486,000.
This is $164,800,000 below the budget estimate.

122
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................

TOTAL, OTHER MISSILES .........................................................................................................

9
10
11
12
13

........................

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS/POLLUTION PREVENTION ........................................................................

SPACE PROGRAMS
ADVANCED EHF .....................................................................................................................................

........................

379,586

72,080

34,379

........................

TOTAL, MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES .....................................................................

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ............................................................................................................

OTHER SUPPORT

21,635
276
580
6,888
5,000

842,717

752

291,151
119,904
340,015
48,548
42,347

39,104

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

CLASS IV
MM III MODIFICATIONS .........................................................................................................................
AGM–65D MAVERICK ............................................................................................................................
AGM–88A HARM ...................................................................................................................................
AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE ..............................................................................................................
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ......................................................................................................................

MODIFICATION OF INSERVICE MISSILES

183
225
199
413
144

........................

TACTICAL
JASSM ...................................................................................................................................................
SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) .........................................................................................................................
AMRAAM ...............................................................................................................................................
PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE ..............................................................................................................
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ......................................................................................................................

OTHER MISSILES

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC
MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ—BALLISTIC ..............................................................................................

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

Qty.

2
3
4
5
6

BALLISTIC MISSILES

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

183
225
199
413
144

........................

Qty.

379,586

72,080

34,379

21,635
276
580
6,888
5,000

842,717

752

291,151
119,904
340,015
48,548
42,347

39,104

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Change from

........................

Qty.

123

........................
2
........................
........................
........................
........................
5
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES .......................................................................................................
GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ......................................................................................................................
GPS III SPACE SEGMENT (AP–CY) ........................................................................................................
SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) ...........................................................................................................
GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) .............................................................................................................
DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG (SPACE) .........................................................................................
EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (SPACE) .....................................................................................

EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH INFRASTRUCTURE (SPACE)
SBIR HIGH (SPACE) ..............................................................................................................................

SPECIAL PROGRAMS
SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS ...............................................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER SUPPORT .........................................................................................................

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ..........................................................................

Qty.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

5,343,286

829,702

3,525,304

36,716

........................
583,192

38,398
403,431
74,167
5,244
55,997
95,673
1,852,900

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................

........................
2
........................
........................
........................
........................
5

Qty.

5,178,486

829,702

3,360,504

36,716

728,863
583,192

38,398
398,431
74,167
5,244
55,997
85,873
974,037

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

¥164,800

........................

¥164,800

........................

∂728,863
........................

........................
¥5,000
........................
........................
........................
¥9,800
¥878,863

Change from

124

125
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

21
22
22a

Item

GPS III Space Segment ...............................................................
Maintain program affordability: Eliminating program
management growth .....................................................
Def Meteorological Sat Prog(Space) ...........................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover .........
Evolved Expendable Launch Veh(Space) ....................................
Transfer Launch Capability to line 22a ............................
Evolved Expendable Launch Veh Infrastructure (Space) ...........
Transfer Launch Capability from line 22 ..........................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unjustified increase ............................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

403,431

398,431

¥5,000

........................
95,673
........................
1,852,900
........................
........................
........................

........................
85,873
........................
974,037
........................
728,863
........................

¥5,000
¥9,800
¥9,800
¥878,863
¥878,863
∂728,863
∂878,863

........................

¥150,000

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle [EELV].—The Committee
supports the Air Force strategy to control space launch costs
through efficient procurement of launch services through block
buys, while pursuing a new entrant strategy to provide competition
in space launch missions. The Committee also recognizes that
greater efficiencies by the incumbent contractor have produced substantial cost savings in the program.
The Committee continues to be concerned by the lack of visibility
in the funding requests to support the EELV program, and again
recommends that procurement funding be separated into one line
for EELV launch services and a separate line for EELV launch capability and associated costs.
The Committee also directs that the Secretary of the Air Force
specifically identify such funds requested in fiscal year 2015 and
future budgets to support the sole source block buy of EELV launch
services, and such funds requested to support the competitive
award of launch services among the incumbent and any qualified
new entrants.
Small Diameter Bomb.—Small Diameter Bomb II [SDB II] is a
250 pound class precision-guided air-to-ground munition used
against both fixed and moving targets at standoff range in all
weather conditions. It is a joint Air Force/Navy program with the
Air Force as the lead service. A variant of SDB I, called the Laser
SDB I, has capability against moving targets in clear weather. SDB
II has experienced past delays with testing and its integration with
the Joint Strike Fighter. A rigorous testing schedule remains including five guided test vehicle test flights and two live fire test
flights before achieving milestone C and Low Rate Initial Production in fiscal year 2014.
The Committee is closely monitoring SDB II and believes an
overall review of the SDB program and its capability mix is appropriate, and directs the Secretary of the Air Force to brief the congressional defense committees on the status of the SDB program
consistent with S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act for
fiscal year 2014, as reported.

126
PROCUREMENT

AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE

2013 1

$593,909,000
759,442,000
759,442,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $759,442,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................
........................
6,965
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

BOMBS
PRACTICE BOMBS .................................................................................................................................
GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................................................................
JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .........................................................................................................

FLARE, IR MJU–7B
CAD/PAD ...............................................................................................................................................
EXPLOSIVE ORDINANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) .............................................................................................
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................................................................
MODIFICATIONS .....................................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 .............................................................................................................

FUZES
FLARES .................................................................................................................................................
FUZES ...................................................................................................................................................

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE .......................................................................

WEAPONS
SMALL ARMS ........................................................................................................................................

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE .............................................................

1
2

3
4
5

6
7
8
9
10

11
13

........................
........................

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, AIR FORCE
ROCKETS ...............................................................................................................................................
CARTRIDGES .........................................................................................................................................

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE

Qty.

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

759,442

21,026

738,416

55,864
76,037

35,837
7,531
499
480
9,765

30,840
187,397
188,510

15,735
129,921

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
6,965

........................
........................

Qty.

759,442

21,026

738,416

55,864
76,037

35,837
7,531
499
480
9,765

30,840
187,397
188,510

15,735
129,921

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

Change from

127

128
OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $17,059,965,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 16,760,581,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 17,542,627,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,542,627,000.
This is $782,046,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

CARGO ∂ UTILITY VEHICLES
FAMILY MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE ....................................................................................................
CAP VEHICLES ......................................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (CARGO) .........................................................................................................

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES .....................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SPECIAl) ........................................................................................................

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ...........................................................................................

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
ITEMS LESS THAT $5,000,000 ..............................................................................................................

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
RUNWAY SNOW REMOVAL & CLEANING EQUIP ....................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT ..............................................................................................

2
3
4

5
6

9
10

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT (COMSEC)
COMSEC EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................................
MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) ...................................................................................................................

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................
INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIP ................................................................................................................
ADVANCE TECH SENSORS ....................................................................................................................
MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ...............................................................................................................

12
13

14
15
16
17

ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP

........................

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLE ..........................................................................................................

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

Qty.

VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

2,789
31,875
452
14,203

149,661
726

85,414

6,144
1,580

8,669

23,794

13,093
13,983

8,019
946
7,138

2,048

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

2,789
67,575
452
14,203

149,661
726

85,414

6,144
1,580

8,669

23,794

13,093
13,983

8,019
946
7,138

2,048

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................
∂35,700
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................

........................

Change from

........................

Qty.

129

Qty.

Item

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANDING .................................................................................................................
NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM ...............................................................................................................
BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED ......................................................................................................
THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPRO .....................................................................................................
WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST .....................................................................................................
STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL ..................................................................................................
CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX ..........................................................................................................
TAC SIGNIT SPT ....................................................................................................................................

SPECIAL COMM?09ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................................
AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM .......................................................................................
MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL ....................................................................................................
AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM ............................................................................................
COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .................................................................................................................
C3 COUNTERMEASURES .......................................................................................................................
GCSS?09AF FOS ....................................................................................................................................
THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYS .............................................................................................................
AIR OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ..........................................................................................................

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................
AFNET ...................................................................................................................................................
VOICE SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................................................
USCENTCOM .........................................................................................................................................

DISA PROGRAMS
SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PROG SPACE ..............................................................................................
NAVSTAR GPS SPACE ...........................................................................................................................
NUDET DETECTION SYS (NDS) SPACE ..................................................................................................
AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE ...........................................................................................
SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE .......................................................................................................
MILSATCOM SPACE ...............................................................................................................................
SPACE MODS SPACE ............................................................................................................................
COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35

36
38
39
40

41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

[Dollars in thousands]

28,235
2,061
4,415
30,237
98,062
105,935
37,861
7,171

80,558
97,588
8,419
34,276

49,627
13,559
11,186
43,238
10,431
13,769
19,138
8,809
26,935

46,232
11,685
19,248
19,292
17,166
22,723
27,930
217

2014 budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

28,235
2,061
4,415
30,237
98,062
60,935
35,861
7,171

80,558
97,588
8,419
34,276

49,627
13,559
11,186
43,238
20,431
13,769
19,138
8,809
26,935

46,232
11,685
19,248
19,292
17,166
44,023
27,930
217

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

Budget
estimate

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥45,000
¥2,000
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
∂10,000
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂21,300
........................
........................

Change from

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

130

........................
........................

MODIFICATIONS
COMM ELECT MODS .............................................................................................................................

TOTAL, ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP .....................................................

DEPOT PLANT ∂ MATERIALS HANDLING EQ
MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING ......................................................................................................

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT ..............................................................................................................
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................................................................................................
PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT ...................................................................................................
MOBILITY EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE SUPPORT) ............................................................................................

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
DARP RC135 .........................................................................................................................................
DISTRIBUTED GROUND SYSTEMS .........................................................................................................
SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM .................................................................................................................
DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAM ....................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP ....................................................

SPARE AND REPAIR PARTS
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................................................................

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............................................................................

58
59
60
61
62

64
65
67
68

........................
........................

PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIP
NIGHT VISION GOGGLES .......................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SAFETY) ..............................................................................................

55
56

OTHER BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIP

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

ORGANIZATION AND BASE
TACTICAL C?09E EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................
COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER .................................................................................................
RADIO EQUIPMENT ................................................................................................................................
CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................
BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................................................

49
50
51
52
53

16,760,581

14,519,256

25,746

807,441

24,528
137,819
479,586
45,159

16,762
33,768
2,495
12,859
1,954

9,332

14,524
28,655

1,322,724

55,701

83,537
11,884
14,711
10,275
50,907

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

17,542,627

15,244,642

25,746

847,557

24,528
137,819
479,586
96,159

16,762
33,768
2,495
12,859
1,954

9,332

3,640
28,655

1,339,268

55,701

83,537
8,428
14,711
10,275
50,907

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

∂782,046

∂725,386

........................

∂40,116

........................
........................
........................
∂51,000

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

¥10,884
........................

∂16,544

........................

........................
¥3,456
........................
........................
........................

131

132
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

31
46

47
50

Item

Intelligence Comm Equipment .............................................
Air National Guard unfunded requirement: Remote
Split Operation equipment and intel targeting facilities ......................................................................
Strategic Command And Control ..........................................
Air Force unfunded requirement: Stratcom facility fit
out ...........................................................................
Combat Training Ranges ......................................................
Range improvements ...................................................
Milsatcom Space ..................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Acquisition
strategy—FAB-T ......................................................
Def Meteorological Sat Prog(Space) .....................................
Improving funds management: OCS modernization ...
Combat Survivor Evader Locater ..........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unit cost
growth for batteries ................................................
Night Vision Goggles ............................................................
Program termination: Night vision goggles cueing
and display .............................................................
Defense Space Reconnaissance Prog. ..................................
Classified adjustment .................................................
Classified Programs .............................................................
Classified adjustment .................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

31,875

67,575

∂35,700

..........................
22,723

..........................
44,023

∂35,700
∂21,300

..........................
10,431
..........................
105,935

..........................
20,431
..........................
60,935

∂21,300
∂10,000
∂10,000
¥45,000

..........................
37,861
..........................
11,884

..........................
35,861
..........................
8,428

¥45,000
¥2,000
¥2,000
¥3,456

..........................
14,524

..........................
3,640

¥3,456
¥10,884

..........................
45,159
..........................
14,519,256
..........................

..........................
96,159
..........................
15,244,642
..........................

¥10,884
∂51,000
∂51,000
∂725,386
∂725,386

MQ–1/9 Remote Split Operations.—As a result of the Air Force
force structure actions, six Air National Guard squadrons will transition to MQ–1/9 remote split operations by fiscal year 2020. The
Committee recommends $35,700,000 to fully fund a shortfall that
the Air Force identified to the Committee for equipment to support
the standup of these Squadron Operations Centers. The Committee
directs the Secretary of the Air Force to submit an execution plan
for these additional funds no later than 90 days after the enactment of this act. The execution plan should include detailed plans
for funding, training, manning, and equipping all six Air National
Guard squadrons. Further, the Committee directs that training will
begin for all six squadrons in fiscal year 2014 as previously indicated by the Air Force and expects that funding to equip the remaining squadrons will be included in the fiscal year 2015 budget
request.
PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$4,872,546,000
4,534,083,000
4,434,769,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $4,434,769,000.
This is $99,314,000 below the budget estimate.

133
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY .......................................................................................................
TELEPORT PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................
ITEMS LESS THAN $5M ........................................................................................................................
NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) .....................................................................................
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK .......................................................................................
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................................................................................................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
MAJOR EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................................
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT .................................................................................................................
AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS ............................................................................
EQUIPMENT ...........................................................................................................................................
OTHER CAPITAL EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
VEHICLES ..............................................................................................................................................
OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................................

8
11
12
13
14
16

17
18
19
20
21

22
23

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MDA
THAAD SYSTEM .....................................................................................................................................
AEGIS BMD ...........................................................................................................................................
BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS .....................................................................................................................
AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III .....................................................................................................................

36
52
........................
1

........................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ..............................................................................................................

25
26
27
28

........................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
MAJOR EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DTSA

........................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
MAJOR EQUIPMENT ITEMS LESS THAN $5M .........................................................................................

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE

Qty.

MAJOR EQUIPMENT

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

581,005
580,814
62,000
131,400

100
13,395

13,137
15,414
1,454
978
5,020

16,189
66,075
83,881
2,572
125,557
16,941

47,201

5,711

1,291

2014 budget
estimate

36
52
........................
1

2
3

........................
5
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Qty.

576,851
580,814
62,000
131,400

100
13,395

13,137
15,414
1,454
978
5,020

16,189
66,075
69,375
2,572
125,557
16,941

47,201

5,711

1,291

Committee
recommendation

........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

Budget
estimate

¥4,154
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
........................
¥14,506
........................
........................
........................

........................

Change from

........................

Qty.

134

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ..........................................................................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD ......................................................................................................................
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ......................................................................................................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS .......................................................................................................................

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS .....................................................................................................................

TOTAL, MAJOR EQUIPMENT .....................................................................................................

38
39

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
3
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

AVIATION PROGRAMS
SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT .............................................................................
MH–60 SOF MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..............................................................................................
NON-STANDARD AVIATION ....................................................................................................................
SOF U–28 .............................................................................................................................................
MH–47 CHINOOK ..................................................................................................................................
RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ....................................................................................................
CV–22 SOF MODIFICATION ...................................................................................................................
MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .....................................................................................................
MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .....................................................................................................
STUASL0 ...............................................................................................................................................
PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE ................................................................................................................
AC/MC–130J .........................................................................................................................................
C–130 MODIFICATIONS .........................................................................................................................

SHIPBUILDING
UNDERWATER SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................................

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
SOF ORDNANCE ITEMS UNDER $5,000,000 .........................................................................................

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ...............................................................................................................
DCGS–SOF ............................................................................................................................................

OTHER ITEMS UNDER $5,000,000 ........................................................................................................

43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
53
54
55
57

69
71

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

IRON DOME SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................

81,711

79,819
14,906

159,029

37,439

112,456
81,457
2,650
56,208
19,766
850
98,927
20,576
1,893
13,166
107,687
51,870
71,940

2,108,881

35,259

14,792

37,345
16,678

14,363

220,309

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

79,604

79,819
14,906

159,029

30,439

110,456
81,457
2,650
56,208
19,766
850
98,927
20,576
14,893
13,166
93,520
51,870
61,317

2,090,221

35,259

14,792

37,345
16,678

14,363

220,309

........................

........................
........................

........................

........................
........................

........................

¥2,107

........................
........................

........................

¥7,000

¥2,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂13,000
........................
¥14,167
........................
¥10,623

¥18,660

........................

........................
........................

........................

135

89
90
92
93
94

74
72
73
74
76
81
82
87

TOTAL, SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ...............................................................................

CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE
INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION ......................................................................................................
INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................
JOINT BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ...............................................................................................
COLLECTIVE PROTECTION .....................................................................................................................
CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE ................................................................................................................
TOTAL, CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE ................................................................................

TOTAL, CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE ................................................................................

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................................................................

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................................................................

Qty.

SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS .......................................................................................................
SPECIAL PROGRAMS .............................................................................................................................
TACTICAL VEHICLES ..............................................................................................................................
WARRIOR SYSTEMS UNDER $5,000,000 ..............................................................................................
COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................
SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE .............................................................................
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS .....................................................................................................

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

4,534,083

544,272

294,821

14,271
101,667
13,447
20,896
144,540
........................

1,586,109

35,053
41,526
43,353
210,540
20,000
6,645
25,581
191,061

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

4,434,769

539,272

282,364

13,314
101,667
13,447
20,896
133,040
........................

1,522,912

32,753
9,526
37,353
210,540
20,000
6,645
25,581
191,061

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

¥99,314

¥5,000

¥12,457

¥957
........................
........................
........................
¥11,500

¥63,197

¥2,300
¥32,000
¥6,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Change from

136

137
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

69
72

Item

Items Less Than $5 Million ....................................................
DISA requested transfer to O&M, DW DISA line for the
Senior Leadership Enterprise Program .....................
THAAD .....................................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Launchers excess
cost growth ...............................................................
Rotary Wing Upgrades and Sustainment ...............................
Improving funds management: Block simulator upgrades delayed ..........................................................
MQ–9 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle .............................................
Authorization adjustment: MQ–9 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle capability improvements ..................................
Precision Strike Package ........................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Contract award
delays since new start ..............................................
C–130 Modifications ..............................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Milestone C
delay to FY15 ............................................................
Underwater Systems ...............................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Milestone C
delay to FY15 ............................................................
Other Items <$5M ..................................................................
Improving funds management: Family of loudspeakers
unobligated ...............................................................
Combatant Craft Systems ......................................................
Improving funds management: Excess support costs ..
Special Programs ....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unjustified request .........................................................................
Tactical Vehicles .....................................................................
Improving funds management: Reduction for underexecution ...................................................................
Installation Force Protection ...................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Early to need
Common Analytical Lab system ................................
Individual Protection ...............................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Joint Service Aircrew Mask milestone C delay to FY14 .....................
Department identified joint service ground purpose
mask shortfall ...........................................................
Contamination Avoidance .......................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Dismounted Reconnaissance system milestone C delay to FY14 ....
Classified Programs ...............................................................
Classified adjustment ...................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

83,881

69,375

¥14,506

..........................
581,005

..........................
576,851

¥14,506
¥4,154

..........................
112,456

..........................
110,456

¥4,154
¥2,000

..........................
1,893

..........................
14,893

¥2,000
∂13,000

..........................
107,687

..........................
93,520

∂13,000
¥14,167

..........................
71,940

..........................
61,317

¥14,167
¥10,623

..........................
37,439

..........................
30,439

¥10,623
¥7,000

..........................
81,711

..........................
79,604

¥7,000
¥2,107

..........................
35,053
..........................
41,526

..........................
32,753
..........................
9,526

¥2,107
¥2,300
¥2,300
¥32,000

..........................
43,353

..........................
37,353

¥32,000
¥6,000

..........................
14,271

..........................
13,314

¥6,000
¥957

..........................
101,667

¥957
..........................

..........................

¥10,000

..........................
144,540

..........................
133,040

∂10,000
¥11,500

..........................
544,272
..........................

..........................
539,272
..........................

¥11,500
¥5,000
¥5,000

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$223,236,000
25,135,000
50,135,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $50,135,000.
This is $25,000,000 above the budget estimate.

138
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES .............................................................................................

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT PURCHASES

Item

........................

Qty.

[Dollars in thousands]

25,135

2014 budget
estimate

........................

Qty.

50,135

Committee
recommendation

........................

Qty.

Change from

∂25,000

Budget
estimate

139

140
Additional Funding.—The Committee recognizes the critical role
that the DPA Title III program serves in strengthening the U.S.
defense industrial base and believes that this work is in the national interest. Therefore, the Committee increases funding for
DPA by $25,000,000 over the budget request. The Committee directs that the additional funding be competitively awarded to new
initiatives and priority consideration should be given to completion
of DPA projects initiated in prior years. Furthermore, the Committee directs the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics to inform the congressional defense committees 30 days prior to any obligation or expenditure of these
funds.
NATIONAL GUARD

AND

RESERVE EQUIPMENT

2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $1,500,000,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... ...........................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1,000,000,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,000,000,000.
This is $1,000,000,000 above the budget estimate.
The appropriation includes direction for each Reserve and National Guard component commander to submit to the congressional
defense committees a detailed assessment of that component’s modernization priorities, not later than 30 days after enactment of this
act.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

........................
........................
........................
........................

NAVY RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................

MARINE CORPS RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................

AIR FORCE RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................

TOTAL, RESERVE EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................

........................
........................
........................
........................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT ............................................................

NATIONAL GUARD EQUIPMENT

........................

ARMY RESERVE
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................................................

NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT

Qty.

RESERVE EQUIPMENT

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

........................

2014 budget
estimate

........................

Qty.

1,000,000

630,000

315,000

370,000

70,000

55,000

70,000

175,000

Committee
recommendation

........................

Qty.

∂630,000

∂315,000

∂370,000

∂70,000

∂55,000

∂70,000

∂175,000

Budget
estimate

∂1,000,000

Change from

141

142
High-Priority Items.—The Committee directs that the National
Guard and Reserve Equipment Account shall be executed by the
Chiefs of the National Guard and Reserve components with priority
consideration given to the following items: 13K AT Forklift; ARC
210 Radios for ANG F–16s; Arctic Sustainment Kits; Base Physical
Security Systems; Blue Force Tracker Next Generation; CBRN Reconnaissance Equipment; Chemical and Biological Protective Shelters; Coastal Riverine Force Boats and Communications Upgrades;
Counter Communications Systems; Digital Radar Warning Receivers [ALR–69A] for F–16s; F–15 AESA Radars; F–16/F–15/A–10
Radar Warning Receivers and Defensive Systems Upgrades; General Engineering Equipment; Generation 4 Advanced Targeting
Pods; HC–130 Hostile Fire Indication System; Helmet-Mounted Integrated Targeting System; In-Flight Propeller Balancing System;
Integrated Vehicle Health Management System for UH–72As; Internal and External Auxiliary Fuel Tanks for Rotary Wing Aircraft;
Joint Threat Emitters; KC–135 and C–130 Real Time Information
in Cockpit [RTIC] Data Link; Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures [LAIRCM]; Light Utility Helicopters; Lightweight MultiBand Satellite Terminal; Mobile Ad Hoc Network Emergency Communications Equipment; Modernized Medical Equipment Sets for
HMMWVs; Modular Small Arms Training Systems; Reactive Skin
Decontamination Lotion; RED HORSE Squadron Vehicles; Remotely Piloted Aircraft Squadron Operations Centers and Targeting Unit Equipment; Simulation Training Systems; Small and
Light Arms; Tactical Trucks; Targeting Pod Upgrades; UH–60 A–
L Modernization; UH–60 Civilian Communications Package A & B
Kits; Ultra-Light Tactical Vehicles; VSS Modernization for Geographically Separated Units and Unified Capabilities; and Wireless
Mobile Mesh Network Systems.
Chemical and Biological Protective Shelters [CBPS].—The Committee supports the National Guard’s effort to acquire critical dual
use equipment. The Committee believes National Guard and Reserve Equipment [NGRE] funds should be used to acquire equipment identified on the NGRE Report for fiscal year 2014 Top 25
Equipment Modernization/Shortfall Category List, such as CBPS.
The CBPS is a self-contained, mobile medical unit that is a rapidly
deployable collective protection system designed to operate in the
forward battle area and for domestic response. Previously, the
Commission on National Guard and Reserves stated that the Secretary of Defense should ensure forces identified as rapid responders to domestic catastrophes are ‘‘manned, trained, and equipped to
the highest levels of readiness.’’ The CBPS has been identified as
a critical shortfall item for the past 5 years and is essential to the
National Guard in support of both its national security and homeland missions. Recent events and natural disasters highlighted the
need for a protected, mobile medical capability. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Department to use a portion of this funding
to continue the procurement of CBPS.
Intent of the National Guard and Reserve Equipment Account
[NGREA].—Congress established the National Guard and Reserve
Equipment Account [NGREA] in 1981 to provide the equipment
necessary to maintain the readiness of National Guard and Reserve
components. The Committee recognizes that the Active components

143
do not procure all of the required equipment necessary to resource
their reserve components, especially in a time of fiscal constraint.
NGREA funding is intended to supplement the services’ base procurement appropriations, not substitute for it. The Active components are still expected and required to fund and equip their respective Guard and Reserve components to ensure reserve units
are at a high level of readiness should they need to be deployed.
Consistent with the total force concept, the Active components
serve as the procurement contracting authority in support of the
Guard and Reserve components.
Congress expects the Chiefs of the National Guard and Reserve
components to enhance readiness by procuring items that the services’ base appropriations do not fund. As already established in
law, NGREA funds have and should continue to be used to procure
new aircraft; major weapon systems that are already established as
a stable procurement program; equipment support items; and modifications to rebuild, overhaul, or refurbish existing items without
expanding on the platform capability currently supported by the
Active components.
NGREA provides the needed flexibility to the Guard and Reserve
Chiefs to procure priority readiness items subject only to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense. The
Committee expects that the Guard and Reserve Chiefs will continue to execute their portion of NGREA as Congress has historically directed within the bill, and outlined within the annual law
pertaining to the NGRE account, without prejudice to size or function of the Reserve unit benefitting from this account.
Total Force.—The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 established the National Commission on the Structure
of the Air Force to determine whether and how the structure
should be modified to best fulfill current and anticipated mission
requirements for the Air Force in a manner consistent with available resources. As Congress awaits the recommendations of the
Commission, the Committee notes the likelihood that the fleets of
the Active, Guard, and Reserve components will diverge in the
coming years. As aircraft and other equipment are increasingly operated solely by the Guard and Reserve, the Committee directs the
Active component to continue to resource and invest in the necessary maintenance and upgrades of these aircraft and equipment,
to include program management administration and research, development, test, and evaluation efforts required to integrate items
procured using National Guard and Reserve Equipment funding.

TITLE IV
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION
Funds appropriated under this title provide the resources required to conduct a program of research, development, test and
evaluation, including research in basic science, applied research,
advanced technology development, demonstration and validation,
engineering and manufacturing development, and operational systems development.
The President’s fiscal year 2014 budget requests a total of
$67,520,236,000 for research, development, test and evaluation appropriations.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTION

The Committee recommends research, development, test and
evaluation appropriations totaling $65,806,815,000 for fiscal year
2014. This is $1,713,421,000 below the budget estimate.
Committee recommended research, development, test and evaluation appropriations for fiscal year 2014 are summarized below:
SUMMARY OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION APPROPRIATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget estimate

Account

Committee recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation:
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army ........................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy ........................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force .................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide ..........
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense .......................................

7,989,102
15,974,780
25,702,946
17,667,108
186,300

7,576,342
15,403,145
24,945,541
17,695,487
186,300

¥412,760
¥571,635
¥757,405
∂28,379
........................

Total ..............................................................................................

67,520,236

65,806,815

¥1,713,421

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION OVERVIEW

Alternative Energy Research.—The Committee continues to believe in the fiscal and operational value of investing in alternative
energy research, and recommends an additional $75,000,000 for
Army, Navy and Air Force research and development to continue
research of promising alternative energy technologies, such as renewable energies, alternative fuels, and energy efficiencies. The
Committee encourages the services to examine opportunities to use
the arbitrage of affordable natural gas to enhance their energy
usage efficiency. Additional research is needed to improve the efficiency and durability of technologies for advanced natural gas engine and vehicle technologies, fuel storage, and fueling infrastructure. Therefore, the Committee encourages the military services to
invest in natural gas vehicle and fueling infrastructure research,
(144)

145
development, and technology demonstrations to address these
areas.
Technology Transfer.—The Committee recognizes the importance
of transitioning technology between the Federal Government and
non-Federal organizations, academia, the nonprofit sector, and
State and local governments. Technology transfer ensures that taxpayer investments in research and development are used to benefit
the economy and the general public, along with promoting commercialization for small businesses. Further, in fulfilling its responsibility to ensure the full use of the results of the Nation’s Federal
investment in research and development, the Committee encourages the Department of Defense to place an increased focus on
technology transfer programs, which includes allocation of funds,
and the streamlining of programs and performance metrics for Federal laboratories.
Small Business Innovative Research.—The Committee recognizes
the importance of the Small Business Innovative Research [SBIR]
program and its success in commercialization from federally funded
research and development projects. The SBIR program creates jobs
and encourages domestic small businesses to engage in Federal research and development. The Committee encourages the Department of Defense to place an increased focus on considering SBIR
awards to firms that employ fewer than 50 people.
Solar Research in Dry-Dust Areas.—The Committee supports efforts by the Department of Defense to become more energy efficient. These efforts have demonstrated cost savings and are an important part of the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review and the Department of Defense’s Operational Energy Strategy. Renewable energy, including solar, is an important part of these efforts. Fort
Bliss recently launched the largest renewable energy project in the
military’s history—featuring a 20 megawatt solar farm—with the
goal of Net Zero emissions on base. The Committee believes solar
initiatives are also important for overseas operations, particularly
in the Middle East and Africa, where large amounts of energy often
need to be transported to theater and in-country supplies are unreliable. However, dry-dust problems can prevent the optimal use of
solar energy in some areas. Therefore, the Committee urges the
Department of Defense to make research into the use of solar energy in dry-dust regions a priority in fiscal year 2014.
FAA UAS Test Ranges.—The Committee supports the Federal
Aviation Administration’s ongoing program to establish test sites
for civilian unmanned aircraft systems [UAS]. The Committee understands that Department of Defense test ranges are currently operating at capacity due to overwhelming demand for UAS testing
and because of continued growth in the UAS industry. Because civilian test sites are limited, DOD sites are serving both defense
and civilian industry needs. The FAA’s program will serve to bolster testing capacity across the industry and support this important and growing defense capability.
National Network for Manufacturing Innovation.—The Committee supports the administration’s initiative to create three new
manufacturing institutes including two Department of Defense-led
institutes—a digital manufacturing and design institute and a
lightweight and modern metals manufacturing institute. The two

146
Department of Defense-led institutes, part of the administration’s
larger National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, will address the life cycle of digital data across systems and accelerate the
introduction and use of more affordable products made with high
strength-to-weight alloys that improve performance and reduce energy consumption. The institutes will increase domestic manufacturing competitiveness and efficiency that is necessary for our national defense by bringing together our Nation’s research and development, education, and training activities for a skilled workforce
and the deployment of technological innovations in domestic production of goods.
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, ARMY

2013 1

$8,665,177,000
7,989,102,000
7,576,342,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,576,342,000.
This is $412,760,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY
1
2
3
4

BASIC RESEARCH
IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES .............................................
UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS .......................

21,803
221,901
79,359
113,662

........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH ................................................

436,725

........................

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

APPLIED RESEARCH
MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY ..............................................................
SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY .................................
TRACTOR HIP ................................................................................
AVIATION TECHNOLOGY .................................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ...........................................
MISSILE TECHNOLOGY ...................................................................
ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .............................................
ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION ......................................
COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY ......................
BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY .............................................................
CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY ...
JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................
WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY .....................................
ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ....................................
NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY ..........................................................
COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS ...............................................................
HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY .............................
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ......................................
COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ..............
COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY ...................................
MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ..........................................
MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY .........................

26,585
43,170
36,293
55,615
17,585
51,528
26,162
24,063
64,589
68,300
4,490
7,818
37,798
59,021
43,426
20,574
21,339
20,316
34,209
10,439
70,064
17,654

56,585
43,170
36,293
55,615
17,585
51,528
26,162
24,063
64,589
76,300
4,490
7,818
37,798
59,021
43,426
30,574
21,339
20,316
34,209
10,439
70,064
17,654

∂30,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂8,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂10,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

147
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

27
28

29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY ...........................................................
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................

31,546
93,340

........................
........................

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH .............................................

885,924

933,924

∂48,000

56,056
62,032
81,080
63,919
97,043

66,056
70,032
81,080
63,919
152,043

∂10,000
∂8,000
........................
........................
∂55,000

5,866

10,866

∂5,000

7,800
40,416
9,166
13,627
10,667
15,054
3,194
2,367
25,348
64,009
11,083
180,662
22,806
5,030
36,407
11,745
23,717

7,800
40,416
9,166
13,627
10,667
15,054
3,194
2,367
25,348
84,009
11,083
225,662
22,806
5,030
36,407
11,745
23,717

33,012

........................

882,106

1,025,106

∂143,000

15,301
13,592
10,625
30,612
49,989
6,703
6,894
9,066
2,633
272,384
3,874
5,018
11,556
15,603
14,159
79
55,605

15,301
13,592
........................
30,612
49,989
5,188
6,894
9,066
2,633
166,384
3,874
5,018
11,556
15,603
14,159
79
5,130

........................
........................
¥10,625
........................
........................
¥1,515
........................
........................
........................
¥106,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥50,475

79,232
4,476
28,991

79,232
4,476
........................

........................
........................
¥28,991

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................................
MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...............................................
AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..............................................
WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..................
COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...
COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................................
MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................
TRACTOR HIKE ..............................................................................
NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS ...............
TRACTOR ROSE .............................................................................
COMBATING TERRORISM, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ...............
TRACTOR NAIL ...............................................................................
TRACTOR EGGS .............................................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ...........................................
MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..........................
TRACTOR CAGE .............................................................................
HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ....
LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ....
JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................
NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................................
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ........
MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................
ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE & SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................................
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ............

75
76

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .........................
ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (SPACE) ..........
LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV ...........................
TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION ..................................
ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) ..............................
SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY .......................................
TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—AD ..................
NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .....................
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ......................................
WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK—TACTICAL ......................
NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..........................................
AVIATION—ADV DEV .....................................................................
LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV ......................
MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV .....................................................
SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ..........................
INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE ...............................................
TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES ........................................
INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–
INTERC ......................................................................................
INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE .........................................................
ENDURANCE UAVS ........................................................................
TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION ..........................

636,392

438,786

¥197,606

77
78
79

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ......................................................................
ARMED, DEPLOYABLE OH–58D .....................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .........................................

76,588
73,309
154,621

........................
........................
........................

54
55
56
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
69
70
71
72
74

148
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
93
94
95
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
117
118
119
120
121
122
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131

132
133
134
135
136
137
139
140
141
143
144
145

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

31,826
23,341
4,839
23,841
79,855
2,140
5,002
21,321
514
43,405
1,939
18,980
18,294
17,013
6,701
14,575
27,634
193,748
15,721
41,703
7,379

31,826
23,341
4,839
23,841
90,500
2,140
5,002
21,321
514
43,405
1,939
18,980
18,294
17,013
6,701
14,575
27,634
100,000
15,721
41,703
7,379

........................
........................
........................
........................
∂10,645
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥93,748
........................
........................
........................

39,468
92,285
8,209

........................
........................
........................

JOINT TACTICAL RADIO ..................................................................
MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO ..................................
ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM ...................................................
TRACTOR CAGE .............................................................................
INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS ......................................................
MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................................
JAVELIN .........................................................................................
FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................................
NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—SDD .....................................................
COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT ..........................
NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—SDD .......................................
AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—SDD ...
CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................
AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT ..............................
DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—SDD ................
COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE .....................
BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION ...................
WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—SDD ................................................
LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—SDD .............................
COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—SDD .........
MEDICAL
MATERIEL/MEDICAL
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................
LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—SDD ...........................................
ARTILLERY MUNITIONS ..................................................................
ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE ........................................................................................
RADAR DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................
GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) ...........
FIREFINDER ...................................................................................
SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL .....................................
ARTILLERY SYSTEMS .....................................................................
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................
ARMY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES SYSTEM (A–
IMH) ..........................................................................................
ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE ............................................
JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER ..............................................
AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSSTEM ..........................................
JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................
PAC–2/MSE MISSILE .....................................................................
ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) .............
MANNED GROUND VEHICLE ..........................................................
AERIAL COMMON SENSOR ............................................................
NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION ..........................................
JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE ENG AND MANUFACTURING .......
TROJAN—RH12 .............................................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .........................................

22,958
1,549
17,342
47,221
48,477
80,613
68,814

22,958
1,549
227
20,221
33,477
121,313
68,814

........................
........................
¥17,115
¥27,000
¥15,000
∂40,700
........................

137,290
116,298
68,148
33,219
15,127
68,843
364,649
592,201
10,382
21,143
84,230
3,465
10,806

69,290
116,298
68,148
33,219
15,127
68,843
369,649
423,201
10,382
21,143
84,230
3,465
10,806

¥68,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂5,000
¥169,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................................

2,857,026

2,523,508

¥333,518

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ..............................................
TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................
MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ..............................................................
RAND ARROYO CENTER ................................................................
ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL ...............................................................
CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM .....................................
ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ...........................................
ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS ..........
SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS ............................................
AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION .............................................................
METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES .....................
MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ......................................................

16,934
13,488
46,672
11,919
193,658
37,158
340,659
66,061
43,280
6,025
7,349
19,809

24,434
13,488
46,672
19,419
193,658
22,258
340,659
66,061
43,280
6,025
7,349
19,809

∂7,500
........................
........................
∂7,500
........................
¥14,900
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

149
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154

165
166
168
169
171
173
174
176
177
178
179
180
182
183
184
186
187

Change from
budget estimate

EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS ................................................
SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING ............................................
ARMY EVALUATION CENTER ..........................................................
SIMULATION & MODELING FOR ACQ, RQTS, & TNG (SMART) .......
PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................
TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES ...........................................
MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY .....
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT ...........
MANAGEMENT
HEADQUARTERS
(RESEARCH
AND
DEVELOPMENT) .........................................................................

5,941
55,504
65,274
1,283
82,035
33,853
53,340
5,193

5,941
55,504
65,274
1,283
82,035
33,853
58,340
5,193

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂5,000
........................

54,175

........................

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..........................

1,159,610

1,164,710

∂5,100

110,576
3,717
70,053
98,450
........................
........................
30,940
177,532
36,495

96,476
3,717
29,200
........................
60,000
38,450
25,520
177,532
36,495

¥14,100
........................
¥40,853
¥98,450
∂60,000
∂38,450
¥5,420
........................
........................

257,187
315
6,186
1,578
62,100
18,778
7,108
7,600
9,357
41,225
18,197
14,215
33,533
27,622
10,901
2,321
12,031
12,449
56,136

239,824
315
6,186
1,578
62,100
18,778
7,108
7,600
9,357
41,225
18,197
14,215
33,533
27,622
10,901
2,321
12,031
12,449
56,136

¥17,363
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ...................................
LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ................................................................
PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT ................................................
AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE ................................................
AEROSTAT EMD .............................................................................
AEROSTAT COCOM EXERCISE .......................................................
ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM ...........................
COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ..............................
MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................................
AIRCRAFT
MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS ...............................................................................
AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ..........
DIGITIZATION .................................................................................
MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM .........
OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS .................
TRACTOR CARD .............................................................................
JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM ................................................
SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ....................................
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ..............................
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .............................................
SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) ...................................
WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................
TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................
MQ–1 SKY WARRIOR A UAV .........................................................
RQ–11 UAV ...................................................................................
RQ–7 UAV .....................................................................................
BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE ..........................................
END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES .....................

156
157
159
160
160A
160B
161
162
163
164

Committee
recommendation

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ..............

1,126,602

1,048,866

¥77,736

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................

4,717

........................

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL,
ARMY ...........................................................................

7,989,102

7,576,342

¥412,760

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2013 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Materials Technology ............................................................
Materials research and technology .............................
Nanotechnology research .............................................
Silicon carbide research ..............................................

26,585
..........................
..........................
..........................

56,585
..........................
..........................
..........................

Change from
budget estimate

∂30,000
∂15,000
∂5,000
∂10,000

150
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

14
20
29
30
33
34
45
47
56

76
84

102

111

112
113

114

118

125

126

Item

Ballistics Technology ............................................................
Authorization adjustment: WIAMAN schedule adjustment ........................................................................
Countermine Systems ...........................................................
Unexploded ordnance and landmine detection research ......................................................................
Warfighter Advanced Technology ..........................................
Program increase .........................................................
Medical Advanced Technology ..............................................
Military Burn Research Program .................................
Combat Vehicle and Automotive Advanced Technology .......
Alternative energy research .........................................
Program increase .........................................................
Space Application Advanced Technology .............................
Program increase .........................................................
Missile and Rocket Advanced Technology ............................
Restore unjustified reduction ......................................
High Performance Computing Modernization Program ........
Restore unjustified reduction ......................................
Landmine Warfare and Barrier—Adv Dev ...........................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Forward Reconnaissance and Explosive Hazard Detection
(FREHD) program deferred by the Army .................
Soldier Support and Survivability .........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Rapid Equipping Force non-base budget program ....................
Warfighter Information Network-Tactical—DEM/VAL ...........
Maintaining program affordability: Increment III excessive growth ........................................................
Technology Maturation Initiatives ........................................
Maintaining program affordability: DS3 unjustified
request ....................................................................
Improving funds management: DX1 excess carryover ..........................................................................
Endurance UAVs ...................................................................
Program termination: LEMV .........................................
Infantry Support Weapons ....................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: S62 CounterDefilade Target Engagement—transfer from WTCV
at request of Army for corrective actions ..............
Restoring acquisition accountability: S63 Individual
Carbine program terminated by Army ....................
Brigade Analysis, Integration and Evaluation .....................
Maintaining program affordability: NIE excessive
costs ........................................................................
General Fund Enterprise Business System [GFEBS] ............
Improving funds management: DV6 GFEBS–SA—
Fully funded in fiscal year 2013, per Army request .......................................................................
Firefinder ...............................................................................
Improving funds management: P3I program delays ..
Soldier Systems—Warrior Dem/Val ......................................
Maintaining program affordability: S75 excessive
costs ........................................................................
Artillery Systems—EMD ........................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer from
WTCV for Paladin at Army request .........................
Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army [IPPS–A] .........
Restoring acquisition accountability: Increment II excessive delays .........................................................
Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense [AIAMD] ..............
Program increase for cyber security and supply chain
risk management ....................................................
Manned Ground Vehicle ........................................................

2013 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

68,300

76,300

∂8,000

..........................
20,574

..........................
30,574

∂8,000
∂10,000

..........................
56,056
..........................
62,032
..........................
97,043
..........................
..........................
5,866
..........................
64,009
..........................
180,662
..........................
10,625

..........................
66,056
..........................
70,032
..........................
152,043
..........................
..........................
10,866
..........................
84,009
..........................
225,662
..........................
..........................

∂10,000
∂10,000
∂10,000
∂8,000
∂8,000
∂55,000
∂25,000
∂30,000
∂5,000
∂5,000
∂20,000
∂20,000
∂45,000
∂45,000
¥10,625

..........................
6,703

..........................
5,188

¥10,625
¥1,515

..........................
272,384

..........................
166,384

¥1,515
¥106,000

..........................
55,605

..........................
5,130

¥106,000
¥50,475

..........................

¥40,986

..........................
28,991
..........................
79,855

..........................
..........................
..........................
90,500

¥9,489
¥28,991
¥28,991
∂10,645

..........................

∂11,000

..........................
193,748

..........................
100,000

¥355
¥93,748

..........................
17,342

..........................
227

¥93,748
¥17,115

..........................
47,221
..........................
48,477

..........................
20,221
..........................
33,477

¥17,115
¥27,000
¥27,000
¥15,000

..........................
80,613

..........................
121,313

¥15,000
∂40,700

..........................
137,290

..........................
69,290

∂40,700
¥68,000

..........................
364,649

..........................
369,649

¥68,000
∂5,000

..........................
592,201

..........................
423,201

∂5,000
¥169,000

151
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

132
135
137

152
156

159

160

160A

160B

161

164

Item

Restoring acquisition accountability: Excess technology development undefinitized contract extension funding ............................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Excessive funding
for prototypes ..........................................................
Threat Simulator Development .............................................
Cyber test and evaluation enterprise infrastructure ..
Rand Arroyo Center ...............................................................
Restore unjustified reduction ......................................
Concepts Experimentation Program .....................................
Reducing duplication: Project 317 contractor
growth .....................................................................
Munitions Standardization, Effectiveness and Safety .........
Program increase .........................................................
MLRS Product Improvement Program ...................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Project 78G
firm fixed price contract cost growth .....................
Patriot Product Improvement ................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Only for nearterm urgent improvements .....................................
Aerostat Joint Project Office .................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer to
lines 160A and 160B for oversight ........................
Aerostat Joint Program Office: Conclusion of EMD effort
only ...................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer from
line 160 for conclusion of EMD effort only ............
Aerostat Joint Program Office: COCOM exercise
only ...................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Transfer from
line 160 for COCOM exercise only ..........................
Adv Field Artillery Tactical Data System ..............................
Improving funds management: Increment 2 Army
identified excess .....................................................
Aircraft Modifications/Product Improvement Programs .......
Improving funds management: Project 430 Block II
excess carryover ......................................................

2013 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

..........................

¥99,000

..........................
16,934
..........................
11,919
..........................
37,158

..........................
24,434
..........................
19,419
..........................
22,258

¥70,000
∂7,500
∂7,500
∂7,500
∂7,500
¥14,900

..........................
53,340
..........................
110,576

..........................
58,340
..........................
96,476

¥14,900
∂5,000
∂5,000
¥14,100

..........................
70,053

..........................
29,200

¥14,100
¥40,853

..........................
98,450

..........................
..........................

¥40,853
¥98,450

..........................

¥98,450

..........................

60,000

∂60,000

..........................

∂60,000

..........................

38,450

∂38,450

..........................
30,940

..........................
25,520

∂38,450
¥5,420

..........................
257,187

..........................
239,824

¥5,420
¥17,363

..........................

¥17,363

Warfighter Information Network–Tactical [WIN–T] Increment
III.—The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $271,284,000 for
WIN–T Increment III, an increase of $92,652,000 over amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2013, and an increase of $195,032,000
over amounts previously programmed for fiscal year 2014. In the
fiscal year 2014 budget submission, the Army has also programmed
an additional $249,608,000 over amounts previously programmed
for fiscal year 2015. The Committee questions the fiscal soundness
of adding close to $450,000,000 to this program in the next 2 fiscal
years. The Committee notes that a follow-on development contract
award scheduled for earlier this year has been delayed and that
the program’s acquisition program baseline is expected to be revised later this year. Therefore, the Committee finds this increase
in resources premature and recommends continuing the program at
fiscal year 2013 levels.
Army Network Integrated Evaluation [NIE].—The fiscal year
2014 budget request includes $193,748,000 for two Network Integrated Evaluations [NIE], which are semi-annual assessments and
formal test events of network technologies in the context of a military exercise. The Committee notes that to date, the Army has con-

152
ducted five such events, which include formal development and
operational tests of programs of record, as well as informal evaluations of Government- or contractor-provided systems in response to
Army-identified capability gaps. As confirmed in a Government Accountability Office August 2013 report assessing the NIE, the Committee is not aware of significant successful technology transitions
of the over 100 systems evaluated at the NIE to date, despite additional funds having been provided by Congress specifically for that
purpose. The Committee further notes that the Army has not been
able to execute previously appropriated funding for the NIE and
has reprogrammed or carried-over over 90 percent of total fiscal
year 2012 and fiscal year 2013 funding. Given the fiscal constraints
the Army is facing, the Committee questions the return on investment for NIE in its current form. Therefore, the Committee recommends reducing the scope of the NIE, allowing the Army and
vendors to prioritize their investments to support Army requirements.
Ground Combat Vehicle [GCV].—The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $592,201,000 for the Ground Combat Vehicle. The
program was restructured earlier this year using previously appropriated funds. As part of the program’s restructure, the Army
awarded two undefinitized contract actions [UCAs] in April 2013,
which it plans to definitize by December 2013. The Committee
notes the historically measurable cost growth of UCAs on development programs, as restated in the Department’s 2013 annual report on the performance of the Department of Defense acquisition
system. The Army has budgeted over $140,000,000 for these contracts in fiscal year 2014, which due to the fiscal year 2013 funds
already applied to the UCAs is excess to stated requirements.
Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of $99,000,000
to the budget request for undefinitized contract actions. In addition, the Army is planning to spend over $470,000,000 over the
next 3 fiscal years for the fabrication of 12 GCV prototypes. While
the Committee recognizes the value of certain prototype activities
during the development phase of the program, the acquisition
strategy and funding profile would expend close to $40,000,000 per
individual prototype vehicle. Therefore, the Committee denies the
$70,000,000 requested for prototypes in fiscal year 2014. The Committee notes that none of these adjustments affect the Government
program office, nor do they impede the Army’s ability to award the
GCV engineering and manufacturing development contract in September 2014, as planned.
Improved Military Tactical Batteries.—The Committee continues
to be concerned with the high operational and maintenance costs,
and performance issues related to the short life of standard military vehicle batteries. The Committee encourages the Army to continue efforts designed to capture cost savings and performance improvements through storage and operation of military vehicle batteries.
Prototype Integration Facility.—The Army prototype integration
facility [PIF] remains a key, award-winning enterprise asset. The
Committee notes that since 2002, the PIF has executed in excess
of $3,100,000,000 in rapid response, quick reaction, and high-priority weapons system hardware and services support to the

153
warfighter. The PIF does not receive mission or program budget
funds and relies on customer funding to execute specific weapon
system program requirements. The Committee encourages the
Army to continue to support upgrades to the PIF and to maintain
the fast-response capability of the PIF so that this unique and valuable asset will be available to the warfighter to address current
and future needs.
Engineering Systems Integration Labs.—The Committee is aware
of new technologies for the development and evaluation of new
weapon systems that can reduce costs and serve as an effective
platform for integrating advanced technology into a weapon system. The use of Engineering Systems Integration Labs [ESILs] has
already proven valuable where they have been utilized. The Committee urges the Army, in conjunction with industry, to implement
ESILs for all major weapon systems, including legacy systems modernization programs.
Cybersecurity of Space Assets.—The Committee understands it is
an Army priority to augment its capability for cybersecurity research on net-centric embedded weapon systems and to research
and evaluate technologies for space-based and cyberspace applications for Army tactical ground forces. The Army’s strategic forces
mission requirements include maintaining Army force modernization in space. The Committee encourages the Army to apply the appropriate resources to ensure cyberspace technologies research for
the security of space assets, which in turn ensures our warfighters
can receive critical information in a battlefield environment.
Leveraging existing personnel and recently acquired technology development management programs can provide services such as
mitigation strategies to agencies that develop, acquire, and maintain space and net-centric weapons assets, to include the Missile
Defense Agency.
Warfighter Helmets.—The high prevalence of warfighters returning from theater with short- and long-term brain injury is indicative of Traumatic Brain Injury [TBI], and is a major concern to
the Committee. The Committee is aware of the physical, emotional,
psychological, social, and financial cost associated with these type
injuries. Therefore, the Committee urges the Army Research Laboratory, in partnership with public universities across the country,
to leverage commercially available technology for improved soldierworn equipment, particularly, pneumatic cushioning systems in
military combat helmets, to protect the health and safety of the
warfighter.
Wireless Medical Technology.—The Committee supports initiatives to improve casualty care of personnel through the development of wireless medical monitoring systems with enhanced data
collection capabilities out to the point of wounding. The Committee
encourages the Army to utilize these wireless medical technologies
in demonstrations, operational evaluations, and deployments in
order to provide greater patient care.

154
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, NAVY

2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $16,941,012,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 15,974,780,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 15,403,145,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $15,403,145,000.
This is $571,635,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY
1
2
3

BASIC RESEARCH
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES .............................................
IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................

112,617
18,230
484,459

112,617
18,230
489,459

........................
........................
∂5,000

TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH ................................................

615,306

620,306

∂5,000

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

APPLIED RESEARCH
POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH .....................................
FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH .....................................
MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY ...........................
COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH .......................................
WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH .........................
ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................
OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH ...........
JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................
UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ...................................
FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV .......
MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ..........

104,513
145,307
47,334
34,163
49,689
97,701
45,685
6,060
103,050
169,710
31,326

104,513
170,307
47,334
34,163
49,689
97,701
45,685
6,060
103,050
169,710
31,326

........................
∂25,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH .............................................

834,538

859,538

∂25,000

48,201
28,328
56,179

........................
........................
........................

21
22
23
25
26

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .............................
FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .............................
ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..............
MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION
(ATD) .........................................................................................
JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........
FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEV .......
WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................
NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS .........
MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..

132,400
11,854
247,931
4,760
51,463
2,000

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ............

583,116

........................

27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS ............................................
AVIATION SURVIVABILITY ...............................................................
DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL .............................
AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ......................................................................
ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ......................................................
TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE .......................................
ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY ...............................
SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES .......
SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE ..............................................
CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...............................................

42,246
5,591
3,262
74
7,964
5,257
1,570
168,040
88,649
83,902

15
16
19
20

155
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

108,713
9,316
77,108
762
2,349
852,977
8,764
20,501
27,052
428,933
27,154
519,140
406,389
........................
36,570
8,404
136,967
1,489
38,422
69,312
9,196
18,850
45,618
3,019
144,951
5,797
308,131
195,189
56,358
55,378
48,842
7,509
5,075
51,178
205,615
37,227
169

108,713
9,316
77,108
762
2,349
827,977
8,764
20,501
27,052
428,933
22,902
519,140
202,618
203,771
18,470
8,404
122,967
1,489
38,422
64,012
7,696
18,850
45,618
3,019
144,951
5,797
289,031
176,189
56,358
55,378
48,842
7,509
........................
51,178
194,719
37,227
169

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥25,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥4,252
........................
¥203,771
∂203,771
¥18,100
........................
¥14,000
........................
........................
¥5,300
¥1,500
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥19,100
¥19,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥5,075
........................
¥10,896
........................
........................

20,874
2,257

........................
........................

38,327
135,985

38,327
105,985

........................
¥30,000

79
80

PILOT FISH ....................................................................................
RETRACT LARCH ...........................................................................
RETRACT JUNIPER .........................................................................
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL ..............................................................
SURFACE ASW ...............................................................................
ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ..........................
SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS ..................................
SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN ..............................................
SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES ....................
ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ........................................
ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS ................................
CHALK EAGLE ................................................................................
LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) ......................................................
LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) MISSION PACKAGES .....................
COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ....................................................
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ...........................................................
MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES .............................................
MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................
JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................
COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT .........................................................
OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .....................
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ......................................................
NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ..............................................................
FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT .............................................................
CHALK CORAL ...............................................................................
NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY .....................................................
RETRACT MAPLE ...........................................................................
LINK PLUMERIA .............................................................................
RETRACT ELM ...............................................................................
LINK EVERGREEN ..........................................................................
SPECIAL PROCESSES ....................................................................
NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..........................................
LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY ..........................................................
NONLETHAL WEAPONS ...................................................................
JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS .................
TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES .......
ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION ..........................................
JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE. ........................................................................................
PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ..............
SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINE ..........................................................................................
OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT ....
JOINT
LIGHT
TACTICAL
VEHICLE
ENGINEERING/
MANUFACTURING ......................................................................
ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP ............................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP ...............................

50,362
8,448
153

50,362
4,908
153

........................
¥3,540
........................

TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION ..........................

4,641,385

4,485,622

¥155,763

81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT .........................................................
AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV ........................................................
STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ..........................................................
MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT ...............
AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING ..........................................
P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ...................................................
WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM .........................................................
TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM .......................................................
ADVANCED HAWKEYE ....................................................................
H–1 UPGRADES .............................................................................
ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS .......................................................
V–22A ...........................................................................................
AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .............................................

40,558
35,825
99,891
17,565
4,026
1,791
11,725
68,463
152,041
47,123
30,208
43,084
11,401

40,558
33,325
99,891
17,565
4,026
........................
11,725
68,463
124,041
47,123
30,208
43,084
11,401

........................
¥2,500
........................
........................
........................
¥1,791
........................
........................
¥28,000
........................
........................
........................
........................

37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
72
73
74
75
76
77
78

156
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
132
133
134
135
136
137
138

139
140
141
142
143
144
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

EA–18 ...........................................................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .........................................
VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT ....................................
NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) ................................................
JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS–NAVY) .................
SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING ...............
LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ........................................
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ....................................................
STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS ............................................
AIRBORNE MCM ............................................................................
MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE ELECTRONIC WARFARE .........
NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL-COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS
ENG ...........................................................................................
FUTURE UNMANNED CARRIER-BASED STRIKE SYSTEM ................
ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS ............................................
SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION .....................................
AIR CONTROL ................................................................................
SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS ....................................................
NEW DESIGN SSN ..........................................................................
SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM ....................................
SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E .......................................
NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES .....................................
MINE DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................
LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT ........................................
JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................
PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS ......
JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS .............................................
SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) .................................
SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) ..................................
SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) .............................
INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING ........................................................
MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT ...............................................................
NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM ................................................................
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD .............................................
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) .........................................................
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................
CH–53K .........................................................................................
JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................
MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) ................................
DDG–1000 .....................................................................................
TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP .............................................
TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS ...............................................
SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM ................................................

11,138
34,964
94,238
257,796
3,302
240,298
1,214
46,007
75,592
117,854
10,080

11,138
34,964
94,238
257,796
3,302
225,298
1,214
46,007
75,592
117,854
10,080

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥15,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

21,413
146,683
275,871
89,672
13,754
69,615
121,566
49,143
155,254
3,689
5,041
26,444
8,897
6,233
442
130,360
50,209
164,799
1,984
9,458
51,430
512,631
534,187
5,564
69,659
503,180
5,500
317,358
187,910
2,140
9,406
22,800

21,413
133,683
188,871
89,672
13,754
69,615
61,696
49,143
205,254
3,689
5,041
26,444
8,897
4,233
442
119,610
46,025
114,799
1,984
9,458
51,430
492,631
514,187
5,564
62,823
471,280
........................
240,358
187,910
2,140
9,406
22,800

........................
¥13,000
¥87,000
........................
........................
........................
¥59,870
........................
∂50,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥2,000
........................
¥10,750
¥4,184
¥50,000
........................
........................
........................
¥20,000
¥20,000
........................
¥6,836
¥31,900
¥5,500
¥77,000
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................................

5,028,476

4,643,145

¥385,331

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ..............................................
TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................
MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ..............................................................
JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ........
STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY ...................................
CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ....................................................
TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES ............................................
MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ..............
STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT .................................................
RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT ......................
RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT .........................................
TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT .................................................
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY .......................
NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT .........
SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT ........................

43,261
71,872
38,033
1,352
5,566
48,345
637
76,585
3,221
72,725
141,778
331,219
16,565
3,265
7,134

43,261
71,872
38,033
1,352
5,566
48,345
637
84,585
3,221
72,725
141,778
281,219
16,565
3,265
7,134

157
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

155
156

159
160
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
199
200
201
206
207
208
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
219
220
221
222
223
224

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT ..................................
TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES .............................................

24,082
497

........................
........................

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..........................

886,137

844,137

¥42,000

699

........................

20,961
35
2,460
9,757
98,057
31,768
1,464
21,729
13,561
131,118
1,971
46,155
2,374

20,961
35
2,460
11,757
98,057
31,768
1,464
21,729
13,561
131,118
1,971
34,423
2,374

........................
........................
........................
∂2,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥11,732
........................

12,407
41,609
7,240
78,208
45,124
2,703
19,563
13,586
197,538
31,863
12,806
88,607
116,928
178,753

12,407
41,609
4,682
78,208
45,124
2,703
19,563
13,586
197,538
31,863
10,106
88,607
116,928
178,753

........................
........................
¥2,558
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥2,700
........................
........................
........................

139,594
42,647
34,394
39,159
2,613
986
66,231
24,476
23,531

118,719
35,647
34,394
31,159
2,613
986
66,231
24,476
23,531

¥20,875
¥7,000
........................
¥8,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

742
4,804
8,381
5,535
19,718
375,235
48,713
102
710
5,013
11,122
28,851
5,116
28,042
50,933
4,998

742
4,804
8,381
5,535
19,718
375,235
48,713
........................
710
5,013
9,122
28,851
5,116
28,042
50,933
4,998

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
HARPOON MODIFICATIONS ............................................................
UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT .........................................................................................
MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS ....................................................
CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY FOLLOW ON ..................................
STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT .................................................
STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT ..........................
SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ....................................
SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .........................
NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS ............................................
RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) ........................................
F/A–18 SQUADRONS .....................................................................
E–2 SQUADRONS ..........................................................................
FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) ....................................
SURFACE SUPPORT .......................................................................
TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER
(TMPC) ......................................................................................
INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ...........................................
AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS .......................................
GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR ...........................................
CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .....................
CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT ...................................................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT .....................
HARM IMPROVEMENT ....................................................................
TACTICAL DATA LINKS ...................................................................
SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ............................
MK–48 ADCAP ...............................................................................
AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................
OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ...................................
MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ...............................
MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS
SYSTEMS ...................................................................................
MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT .............................
USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) .....
TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................
ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......
JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ...............................................
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) .........................................
CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES ..........
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ..............................
NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS—SPACE
(METOC) ....................................................................................
JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS ..................................
TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..
RQ–4 UAV .....................................................................................
MQ–8 UAV .....................................................................................
RQ–11 UAV ...................................................................................
RQ–7 UAV .....................................................................................
SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) .................................
RQ–21A .........................................................................................
MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT ..............................
MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT .........................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ....................................................
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .........................................................
MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) ...........................................

158
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ..............

2,200,690

2,147,723

¥52,967

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................

1,185,132

1,219,558

∂34,426

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL,
NAVY ...........................................................................

15,974,780

15,403,145

¥571,635

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

3
5
42

47
49
49X
50

52
55
56
62
63

68
70

77
79
82

86
89

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Defense Research Sciences ..........................................................
Nanotechnology research .....................................................
Force Protection Applied Research ...............................................
Alternative energy research .................................................
Advanced Submarine System Development .................................
Improving funds management: Unobligated balances for
early to need affordability initiatives .............................
Advanced Surface Machinery Systems .........................................
Improving funds management: Behind in execution ..........
Littoral Combat Ship [LCS] ..........................................................
Transfer to Line 49X ............................................................
Littoral Combat Ship [LCS] Mission Packages ............................
Transfer from Line 49 .........................................................
Combat System Integration ..........................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Late contract
awards .............................................................................
Marine Corps Assault Vehicles .....................................................
Improving funds management: Forward financed ..............
Cooperative Engagement (CEC) ...................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program delay .........
Ocean Engineering Technology Development ...............................
Improving funds management: Forward financed ..............
RETRACT MAPLE ...........................................................................
Improving funds management: Early to need ....................
LINK PLUMERIA .............................................................................
Improving funds management: Milestone slips ..................
Improving funds management: Milestone slips ..................
Land Attack Technology ................................................................
Improving funds management: Early to need ....................
Joint Precision Approach and Landing Systems—Dem/Val ........
Restoring acquisition accountability: JPALS 1B test early
to need ............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: JPALS 1B follow-on
platform integration delay ..............................................
Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Weapon Development ................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program delay .........
ASW Systems Development—MIP ................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program delay .........
AV–8B Aircraft—Eng Dev ............................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Excess program management ..........................................................................
P–3 Modernization Program .........................................................
Program termination: Program is in retirement phase ......
Advanced Hawkeye .......................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Undefined follow on
development for in-flight refueling ................................
Surface Combatant Combat System Engineering (Aegis) ...........

484,459
........................
145,307
........................
852,977

489,459
........................
170,307
........................
827,977

∂5,000
∂5,000
∂25,000
∂25,000
¥25,000

........................
27,154
........................
406,389
........................
........................
........................
36,570

........................
22,902
........................
202,618
........................
203,771
........................
18,470

¥25,000
¥4,252
¥4,252
¥203,771
¥203,771
∂203,771
∂203,771
¥18,100

........................
136,967
........................
69,312
........................
9,196
........................
308,131
........................
195,189
........................
........................
5,075
........................
205,615

........................
122,967
........................
64,012
........................
7,696
........................
289,031
........................
176,189
........................
........................
—
........................
194,719

¥18,100
¥14,000
¥14,000
¥5,300
¥5,300
¥1,500
¥1,500
¥19,100
¥19,100
¥19,000
¥4,000
¥15,000
¥5,075
¥5,075
¥10,896

........................

¥3,459

........................
135,985
........................
8,448
........................
35,825

........................
105,985
........................
4,908
........................
33,325

¥7,437
¥30,000
¥30,000
¥3,540
¥3,540
¥2,500

........................
1,791
........................
152,041

........................
—
........................
124,041

¥2,500
¥1,791
¥1,791
¥28,000

........................
240,298

........................
225,298

¥28,000
¥15,000

159
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

106

107

112

114
119
121

122

123

127

128

130
132

133

134

147

151

164

172

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Restoring acquisition accountability: Schedule delay ........
Unmanned Carrier Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike
(UCLASS) System ......................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Schedule delay ........
Advanced Above Water Sensors ...................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: AMDR MS B 8 month
schedule delay ................................................................
New Design SSN ...........................................................................
Program termination: VA class module program terminated due to affordability ...............................................
Ship Contract Design/Live Fire T&E .............................................
Increased LHA–8 design efforts ..........................................
Personnel, Training, Simulation, and Human Factors .................
Improving funds management: Prior year carry over .........
Ship Self Defense (Detect & Control) ..........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: DT/OT schedule delayed from previous year ................................................
Ship Self Defense (Engage: Hard Kill) .........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: RAM testing delays ..................................................................................
Ship Self Defense (Engage: Soft Kill/EW) ....................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Block 3 EMD award
delay ................................................................................
Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)—EMD ...................................................
Maintain program affordability: F–135 Propulsion system
cost growth .....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Follow-on development—no approved capabilities development document ................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Development test
and evaluation—no approved capabilities development
document .........................................................................
Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)—EMD ...................................................
Maintain program affordability: F–135 Propulsion system
cost growth .....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Follow-on development—no approved capabilities development document ................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Development test
and evaluation—no approved capabilities development
document .........................................................................
Information Technology Development ...........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unjustified request ..
CH–53K RDTE ...............................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Development test delayed to FY14 ..................................................................
Joint Air-to-Ground Missile [JAGM] ...............................................
Program termination: Reduction due to program termination ..............................................................................
Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft [MMA] ........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Concurrency and
Spiral 2 development delay ............................................
Management, Technical & International Support ........................
Printed Circuit Board Executive Agent—Funds Previous
NDAA mandate ................................................................
Test and Evaluation Support ........................................................
Maintain program affordability: Efficiencies savings for
implementing automated test and analysis technologies ...........................................................................
Strike Weapons Development .......................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unjustified request ..
F/A–18 missile flight testing ..............................................
Fleet Telecommunications (Tactical) ............................................

........................

¥15,000

146,683
........................
275,871

133,683
........................
188,871

¥13,000
¥13,000
¥87,000

........................
121,566

........................
61,696

¥87,000
¥59,870

........................
155,254
........................
6,233
........................
130,360

........................
205,254
........................
4,233
........................
119,610

¥59,870
∂50,000
∂50,000
¥2,000
¥2,000
¥10,750

........................
50,209

........................
46,025

¥10,750
¥4,184

........................
164,799

........................
114,799

¥4,184
¥50,000

........................
512,631

........................
492,631

¥50,000
¥20,000

........................

¥10,000

........................

¥5,000

........................
534,187

........................
514,187

¥5,000
¥20,000

........................

¥10,000

........................

¥5,000

........................
69,659
........................
503,180

........................
62,823
........................
471,280

¥5,000
¥6,836
¥6,836
¥31,900

........................
5,500

........................
—

¥31,900
¥5,500

........................
317,358

........................
240,358

¥5,500
¥77,000

........................
76,585

........................
84,585

¥77,000
∂8,000

........................
331,219

........................
281,219

∂8,000
¥50,000

........................
9,757
........................
........................
46,155

........................
11,757
........................
........................
34,423

¥50,000
∂2,000
¥2,000
∂4,000
¥11,732

160
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

176
184

189

190
192
215

219

Item

Restoring acquisition accountability: Joint Aerial Layer
Network program delay ...................................................
Amphibious Tactical Support Units (Displacement Craft) ...........
Improving funds management: Forward financed ..............
MK–48 ADCAP ...............................................................................
Improving funds management: Test and evaluation award
slip ..................................................................................
Marine Corps Ground Combat/Supporting Arms Systems ...........
Program termination: Marine Personnel Carrier program
terminated due to affordability ......................................
Marine Corps Combat Services Support ......................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carry over .........
Tactical AIM Missiles ....................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program delay .........
RQ–11 UAV ...................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Should be funded in
sustainment ....................................................................
RQ–21A .........................................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess program management ................................................................................
Classified Programs .....................................................................
Classified adjustments ........................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

........................
7,240
........................
12,806

........................
4,682
........................
10,106

¥11,732
¥2,558
¥2,558
¥2,700

........................
139,594

........................
118,719

¥2,700
¥20,875

........................
42,647
........................
39,159
........................
102

........................
35,647
........................
31,159
........................
—

¥20,875
¥7,000
¥7,000
¥8,000
¥8,000
¥102

........................
11,122

........................
9,122

¥102
¥2,000

........................
1,185,132
........................

........................
1,219,558
........................

¥2,000
∂34,426
∂34,426

Next Generation Jammer.—Senate Report 112–196 directed the
Government Accountability Office to conduct a review of the program to determine if there are redundancies across the services
and assess whether this effort should become a joint service solution. The report is almost complete, and based on the current recommendation, the Committee recommends the JROC validate the
requirements for this capability and determine which DOD aircraft
should carry this jammer. In addition, the current acquisition
strategy selects one contractor for the program’s Technology Development phase. The Committee is concerned that this approach is
inconsistent with some of the basic tenets of the Weapon System
Acquisition Reform Act of 2009, including those that encourage
competition throughout the acquisition life cycle, and directs the
Navy to maintain competition through the Next Generation
Jammer program’s technology development phase. In addition, the
Navy should ensure that it acquires the necessary technical data
rights and allows for the type of open systems architecture approach that would facilitate continued competition for the remainder of the Next Generation Jammer acquisition program.
Navy Unmanned Combat Air System.—The Committee commends the Navy on the historic launch and arrested landing of the
X–47B unmanned combat air system [UCAS] onboard an aircraft
carrier, which demonstrated an autonomous unmanned aircraft can
be safely integrated into Navy carrier operations. The Navy plans
to retire the aircraft at the end of the fiscal year, after investing
more than $1,500,000,000 in technology development. However, the
Committee is concerned that the Navy plans to retire the aircraft
prior to completing additional risk reduction testing. Therefore,
prior to retiring the aircraft, the Committee directs the Navy to
evaluate if the Navy UCAS–D program can be used for additional
risk reduction activities to minimize ship integration challenges for
the future UCLASS program.

161
Advanced Hawkeye.—The fiscal year 2014 request includes
$152,041,000 for new technology development. A majority of the request is to develop an in-flight refueling capability and future, undefined capabilities. The contract award for the in-flight refueling
capability schedule was delayed by 6 months, and the future development effort lacks clear requirements and definition. As a result,
the Committee recommends a reduction of $28,000,000.
Air and Missile Defense Radar.—The fiscal year 2014 request includes $275,871,000 to continue the engineering and manufacturing development phase. The Navy originally planned to award
the contract and down select to a single manufacturer in November
2012 which was subsequently delayed to July 2013. As a result of
the delay, a majority of the fiscal year 2013 funding will be awarded later than planned. Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of $87,000,000.
Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Weapon Development.—The budget request includes $135,985,000 to begin development of a new
Navy anti-ship weapon. Over the last year, the Navy has made several adjustments to the long range plan for this program. As a result of the uncertainty, and until the Navy has determined the
exact requirements for this program, the Committee recommends a
reduction of $30,000,000.
Virginia Payload Module.—The Fiscal Year 2013 Defense Appropriations Act reduced the fiscal year 2013 budget request for the
Virginia Payload Module by $90,000,000. The Committees was concerned with increasing the Virginia-class submarine size by a third
to accommodate a 93.7 foot module in the submarine’s center. The
Committee believes that the module’s requirements are not defined, and will result in instability to a proven submarine design,
disrupt a stable production line, and add significant cost risk which
is not affordable in these difficult fiscal times. Initial cost estimates
for development alone were $800,000,000. Since then, the Navy has
completed the requirements validation, but the Joint Requirements
Oversight Committee validation is still incomplete. The Committee
recommends no funding for the Virginia Payload Module in fiscal
year 2014.
LHA 8 Amphibious Assault Ship.—The fiscal year 2014 budget
request includes $19,967,000 for LHA 8 amphibious assault ship
preliminary design efforts. The Committee is aware that the Department of the Navy plans to reintroduce a well deck and optimize
the aviation capability of LHA 8, which is planned for initial procurement funding in fiscal year 2015. As described in the Senate
report accompanying S. 1197, the National Defense Act for Fiscal
Year 2014, as reported, previous Navy efforts to start ship construction prior to completing a ship’s design inevitably led to cost
growth and schedule delays. Considering growing fiscal pressure on
the national defense budget and increasing amphibious assault
ship demands from combatant commanders for contingency operations, theater security cooperation, humanitarian assistance, and
conventional deterrence missions, the Committee believes it is essential that LHA 8 be introduced in the most cost-effective manner.
Therefore, the Committee includes an additional $50,000,000 for
LHA 8 advance planning and design and directs the Department
of the Navy to work with industry to identify affordability and

162
producibility strategies that will lead to more efficient construction
of a large deck amphibious assault ship.
Ship Self Defense [SEWIP Block III].—The fiscal year 2014 request includes $164,799,000 to develop advanced technology for the
AN/SLQ–32 radar. The Block III acquisition strategy for developing
this new capability has shifted from beginning in early fiscal year
2013 to mid-fiscal year 2014. Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of $50,000,000.
Multi-Mission
Maritime
Aircraft.—The
Navy
requested
$317,358,000 to continue ‘‘basic’’ development, as well as develop
two separate software and hardware upgrades. Senate Report 112–
196 directed the Joint Requirements Oversight Counsel [JROC] to
validate the additional capabilities, which is still incomplete. In addition to the requested modernization efforts, the program has
identified numerous corrections of deficiencies in the existing system. Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of
$77,000,000 to the second increment of development due to undefined requirements and significant concurrency with ongoing development efforts. The Committee also directs the JROC to validate
the additional capabilities and the Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation office to conduct a business case analysis to determine
whether this 6-year development effort is affordable and provide
the assessment to the congressional defense committees.
Carrier Onboard Delivery [COD] Follow On.—The budget request
includes $2,460,000 to conduct an analysis of alternatives for the
program that will follow the COD. In an effort to ensure the program has an affordable acquisition strategy, the Committee directs
the Navy to provide the acquisition strategy to the congressional
defense committees prior to beginning the technology development
phase.
F–18 Engine Upgrades.—The Committee understands that in
order to enable the future capabilities envisioned in the F/A–18 and
EA–18G aircraft growth roadmap or ‘‘flight plan,’’ the Navy is considering the development of an F–414 engine upgrade. The enhanced durability engine is a modular upgrade that will provide
options for additional power for future capabilities which should
make the engine more affordable and maintainable. The Committee encourages the Navy to begin development of the engine upgrade to support the capabilities envisioned in the EA–18G and F/
A–18E/F flight plans.
Marine Personnel Carrier [MPC].—The fiscal year 2014 request
includes $20,875,000 to begin developing a survivable and mobile
platform to transport Marines when ashore. However, the Marine
Corps has subsequently decided to cancel this effort due to affordability challenges. Consistent with S. 1197, the National Defense
Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014, as reported, the Committee
recommends reducing the budget request by $20,875,000.
RQ–4 Triton UAV.—The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes
$375,235,000 to continue development of the RQ–4 Triton UAV
program. Since last year, the program has experienced a 2-year
delay in development and added $312,000,000 across fiscal year
2014 and 2015. The Committee is concerned with this cost growth
and similarities experienced in the Air Force Global Hawk program. As a result, the Committee directs the Government Account-

163
ability Office to do a thorough review of the remaining tasks associated with completing development, to determine if the risks are
being repeated across the two aircraft, and to provide a report to
the defense committees within 120 days after enactment of this act.
Defense Research Sciences.—The Committee encourages the Department to continue to invest in advanced science and technology
research. Examples of research include high temperature-resistant
and other high performance materials, advanced structural systems
for next generation aircraft, and other aerospace weapon systems.
In addition, the Committee encourages the Department to invest in
functional polymeric silicon materials for advanced energy storage,
photovoltaic, and electronic applications.
Power Generation and Storage.—The Committee encourages the
Department to continue development in power generation and energy storage research, especially to improve the safety of advanced
batteries. The Committee notes that development and deployment
of Li-ion batteries with up to three times the performance capability of other battery products are critical to current and future
DOD missions, but safety incidents have hindered or even halted
their widespread operational adoption. As such, development and
qualification of technologies to reduce the risk of thermal runaway
in Li-ion batteries should be a priority for energy storage research.
Arctic Deep Water Basing.—The Committee commends the Department’s efforts to investigate potential security and resource
issues related to the opening of Arctic sea-routes. The Committee
encourages the Department to continue researching a range of solutions and response, including Arctic forward basing proposals.
The Committee requests the Department to provide a report to the
congressional defense committees on current and future programs
related to Arctic security solutions and provide an analysis of procurement and costs related to both fixed and mobile Arctic basing
options.
Flight Deck Cleaning.—The Committee is concerned with the
lack of efficiency, high-cost and environmental consequences of the
current method of cleaning flight decks on Navy ships. Modern
technology may provide opportunities for improving the current
process by reducing required manpower, decreasing clean-time and
mitigating environmental impacts thereby improving operational
readiness. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Navy to continue to invest in more efficient and effective methods for cleaning
Navy flight decks.
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... $25,399,175,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 25,702,946,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 24,945,541,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $24,945,541,000.
This is $757,405,000 below the budget estimate.

164
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR FORCE
1
2
3

BASIC RESEARCH
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................
UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES .............................................
HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES ..............................

373,151
138,333
13,286

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH ................................................

524,770

........................

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

APPLIED RESEARCH
MATERIALS ....................................................................................
AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES ...........................................
HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH ...............................
AEROSPACE PROPULSION .............................................................
AEROSPACE SENSORS ...................................................................
SPACE TECHNOLOGY .....................................................................
CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ...........................................................
DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY .................................................
DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS ....................
HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH ..................................................

116,846
119,672
89,483
197,546
127,539
104,063
81,521
112,845
138,161
40,217

121,846
119,672
89,483
197,546
127,539
104,063
81,521
112,845
138,161
40,217

∂5,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH .............................................

1,127,893

1,132,893

∂5,000

39,572
12,800
30,579
77,347
149,321
49,128
68,071
26,299

54,572
12,800
30,579
77,347
159,321
43,428
68,071
26,299

∂15,000
........................
........................
........................
∂10,000
¥5,700
........................
........................

20,967
33,996
19,000
41,353
49,093

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

23
24
25
26

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS ...........................
SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) ........................
ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ................................................
AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ..........................................
AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY ..................
ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY .............................................
ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY ........................................
MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) ..............................
HUMAN
EFFECTIVENESS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT ..........................................................................
CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ......................................
ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .............................................
MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ...................................
BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ..
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ............

617,526

636,826

∂19,300

28
29
32
33
34
35
36
38
40
42
44
45
47
49
50
51
52

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT
INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ....................................
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................
SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY .....................................................
COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY ........................................
NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..........................................
INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D ..................................
SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) ...........................................
INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ........................................
POLLUTION PREVENTION (DEM/VAL) .............................................
NEXT GENERATION BOMBER .........................................................
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ...............................................................
HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM .................
REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION ...............................
AIR AND SPACE OPS CENTER .......................................................
JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ..................................................
GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT ........................
OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ...........................................

3,983
3,874
27,024
15,899
4,568
379
28,764
86,737
953
379,437
2,606
103
16,018
58,861
2,500
21,175
........................

3,983
3,874
27,024
15,899
4,568
379
28,764
86,737
953
379,437
2,606
103
16,018
58,861
2,500
21,175
10,000

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

165
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

53
54
55
56

TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM ........................................................
SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES ...............
THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR ..................................
NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) ......

13,636
2,799
70,160
137,233

38,636
2,799
70,160
137,233

∂25,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT .............

876,709

911,709

∂35,000

58
61
62
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
94
97

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ....................................
SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING ........................
ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .........................................
TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE ......................................
PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ....................................................
COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS ............................................................
SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS .....................................
AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK ...................................................
SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD .................
ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT .........................................
SUBMUNITIONS ..............................................................................
AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT ..............................................................
LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS ...............................................................
COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ..........................................................
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF) .........................................................
INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE ........................................
EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE) .....
LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON .................................................
ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION ........................................................
F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B .....................................
NEXT GENERATION AERIAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT ........................
CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION ..................................................
HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E ..........................................................
ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) ...........................................
POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) .........................................................
WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) ..........................................
B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .......................................
NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION ...........................................
FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING ................................................
CV–22 ...........................................................................................

977
3,601
1,971
51,456
50
115,000
23,930
400,258
4,575
352,532
16,284
2,564
17,036
7,273
33,200
816,335
145,442
27,963
5,000
129,411
131,100
1,558,590
393,558
6,242
272,872
124,805
13,948
303,500
67,874
4,663
46,705

977
3,601
1,971
49,956
........................
115,000
23,930
400,258
4,575
322,832
16,284
2,564
17,036
7,273
25,300
796,335
145,442
27,963
5,000
118,411
131,100
1,558,590
201,558
6,242
272,872
109,805
13,948
303,500
6,174
4,663
46,705

........................
........................
........................
¥1,500
¥50
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥29,700
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥7,900
¥20,000
........................
........................
........................
¥11,000
........................
........................
¥192,000
........................
........................
¥15,000
........................
........................
¥61,700
........................
........................

TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................................

5,078,715

4,739,865

¥338,850

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ..............................................
MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ..............................................................
RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE ...........................................................
INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION ..................................
TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT .................................................
ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) ...........................
SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) .......................................................
FACILITIES RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION—TEST & EVAL .....
FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT .....
MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE .....................
SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE ........
ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..................................
GENERAL SKILL TRAINING .............................................................
INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES ...........................................................

17,690
34,841
32,956
13,610
742,658
14,203
13,000
44,160
27,643
13,935
192,348
28,647
315
3,785

17,690
34,841
32,956
12,310
742,658
14,203
13,000
44,160
27,643
6,935
186,348
28,647
315
3,785

........................
........................
........................
¥1,300
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥7,000
¥6,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..........................

1,179,791

1,165,491

¥14,300

383,500
5,000

........................
........................

90,097

34,097

¥56,000

99
100
101
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
114

115
117
118

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
GPS III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT ................................
WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE ...........................................................
AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN RESOURCES
SYSTEM .....................................................................................

166
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

119
121
122
123
124
125
128
130
131
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
142
143
144
145
146
147
149
150
151
152
153
156
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
169
170
171
179
180
181
182
183
185
187
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
199
200
201
206
207

ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY .........................
B–52 SQUADRONS ........................................................................
AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ......................................
B–1B SQUADRONS ........................................................................
B–2 SQUADRONS ..........................................................................
STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM ..........................
REGION/SECTOR
OPERATION
CONTROL
CENTER
MODERNIZATION .......................................................................
WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID
TRAN .........................................................................................
MQ–9 UAV .....................................................................................
A–10 SQUADRONS ........................................................................
F–16 SQUADRONS .........................................................................
F–15E SQUADRONS .......................................................................
MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION ..........................................
F–22 SQUADRONS .........................................................................
F–35 SQUADRONS .........................................................................
TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................
ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......
COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY ................................................
COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE .................................................
AF TENCAP ....................................................................................
PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT ..............................
COMPASS CALL .............................................................................
AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ..........
JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) ...................
AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ...............................
CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) ...................................
AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) ................
TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS .....................................
COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES ..........................
TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY—MOD .........................................
C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ..........................................................
COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION ..........................
DCAPES .........................................................................................
JOINT SURVEILLANCE AND TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM .......
SEEK EAGLE ..................................................................................
USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION ...............................................
WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS ......................................
DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES ......................................
MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .......................................................
CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES .......................................................
AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ....................................
AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ...................................
SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE .............................................
E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) ...........
MINIMUM
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK ..................................................................................
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ..............................
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .............................................
MILSATCOM TERMINALS ................................................................
AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE .....................................................
GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) ................................
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE .........................................................
DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER .........................................................
SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) ......................................
WEATHER SERVICE ........................................................................
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, & LANDING SYSTEM (ATC) ..
AERIAL TARGETS ...........................................................................
SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES ...................................
ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION ...............................................
DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ....................
SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER ..................
SPACE WARFARE CENTER .............................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

32,086
24,007
450
19,589
100,194
37,448

22,086
21,007
450
19,589
100,194
37,448

¥10,000
¥3,000
........................
........................
........................
........................

1,700

........................

3,844
128,328
9,614
177,298
244,289
13,138
328,542
33,000
15,460
84,172
2,582
542
89,816
1,075
10,782
139,369
6,373
22,820
7,029
186,256
743
4,471
10,250
1,431
7,329
15,081
13,248
24,342
10,448
5,512
3,301
62,605
68,099
14,047
5,853
12,197
18,267

3,844
115,828
9,614
177,298
244,289
13,138
328,542
5,900
12,760
84,172
6,882
542
89,816
2,000
10,782
109,969
6,373
22,820
7,029
186,256
743
4,471
10,250
1,431
7,329
15,081
23,148
24,342
10,448
5,512
3,301
62,605
38,099
14,047
5,853
12,197
13,267

........................
¥12,500
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥27,100
¥2,700
........................
∂4,300
........................
........................
∂925
........................
¥29,400
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂9,900
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥30,000
........................
........................
........................
¥5,000

36,288
90,231
725
140,170
117,110
4,430
2,048
288
35,698
24,667
35,674
21,186
195
1,430
330
3,696
2,469

36,288
96,331
725
95,170
117,110
4,430
2,048
288
35,698
24,667
39,174
21,186
195
1,430
10
3,696
2,469

........................
∂6,100
........................
¥45,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂3,500
........................
........................
........................
¥320
........................
........................

167
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Item

208
209
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
226
227
229
230
231
232
233
234
238
239
240
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251

INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE ...............................................
SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) .............................................
DRAGON U–2 ................................................................................
ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES .................................
AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .......................................
MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ..........................................
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................
PREDATOR UAV (JMIP) ..................................................................
RQ–4 UAV .....................................................................................
NETWORK–CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGET (TIARA) .................
COMMON DATA LINK (CDL) ...........................................................
NATO AGS ......................................................................................
SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE ..................................................
GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ...............................................................
JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM ...............................................................
RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION ..........................................................
NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) ............................................
SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS ................................
SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) ..................................................
C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON ...........................................................
C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS .............................................................
C–17 AIRCRAFT ............................................................................
C–130J PROGRAM .........................................................................
LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) ....................
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT ...................................................
SPECIAL TACTICS/COMBAT CONTROL ...........................................
DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ....................................................
LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) ...........................
SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...............................................
OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING ...............................................................
OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES .....................................................
JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY ........................................
CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM .............................................
PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .......................................................
AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY ...............................
FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATION ...................................
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT ..........................................................................

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

8,289
13,345
18,700
3,000
37,828
13,491
7,498
3,326
134,406
7,413
40,503
264,134
23,016
221,276
58,523
2,218
50,547
18,807
1,079
400
61,492
109,134
22,443
4,116
44,553
6,213
1,605
95,238
10,925
1,347
65
1,083
1,577
5,990
786
654

8,289
13,345
18,700
........................
50,328
13,491
7,498
3,326
110,406
7,413
40,503
264,134
23,016
221,276
58,523
2,218
42,547
18,807
1,079
400
61,492
109,134
22,443
4,116
44,553
6,213
1,605
60,478
10,925
1,347
65
1,083
1,577
5,990
786
654

........................
........................
........................
¥3,000
∂12,500
........................
........................
........................
¥24,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥8,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥34,760
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

135,735

........................

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ..............

4,423,014

4,169,459

¥253,555

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................

11,874,528

11,664,528

¥210,000

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AIR
FORCE .........................................................................

25,702,946

24,945,541

¥757,405

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

4
14

18
19

Program element title

Fiscal year 2013
base

Committee
recommendation

Materials .............................................................................
Nanotechnology research ...........................................
Advanced Materials for Weapon Systems ..........................
Materials research and technology ...........................
Metals affordability research ....................................
Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology .....................
Silicon carbide research ............................................
Electronic Combat Technology ............................................

116,846
..........................
39,572
..........................
..........................
149,321
..........................
49,128

121,846
..........................
54,572
..........................
..........................
159,321
..........................
43,428

Change from
budget estimate

∂5,000
∂5,000
∂15,000
∂10,000
∂5,000
∂10,000
∂10,000
¥5,700

168
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

52
53
64
65
70
75

78
82
85
88

103

109

110
118

119
121

131
138

139

Program element title

Restoring acquisition accountability: delayed program start .............................................................
Operationally Responsive Space .........................................
Authorization adjustment: Operationally Responsive
Space .....................................................................
Tech Transition Program ....................................................
Alternative energy research .......................................
Tactical Data Networks Enterprise .....................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: 5th to 4th
Generation Gateway—program delay ...................
Physical Security Equipment ..............................................
Improving funds management: unobligated prior
year funds .............................................................
Space Based Infrared System [SBIRS] High EMD .............
Improving funds management: forward financing—
ground development ..............................................
Combat Training Ranges ....................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Advanced
Radar Threat System Development—late contract award ...........................................................
F–35—EMD ........................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: F–135 Propulsion System cost growth .......................................
ICBM Fuze Modernization ...................................................
Maintaining program affordability: excessive support cost growth ....................................................
CSAR HH–60 Recapitalization ............................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: reduce unit
cost ........................................................................
Polar MILSATCOM (SPACE) .................................................
Budget documentation disparity: unjustified increase ....................................................................
Nuclear Weapons Modernization .........................................
Maintaining program affordability: B61 Life Extension Program .........................................................
Initial Operational Test & Evaluation ................................
Improving funds management: reduction for historic
underexecution ......................................................
Multi-Service Systems Engineering Initiative .....................
Program termination: Multi-Service Systems Engineering Initiative ...................................................
Space and Missile Center (SMC) Civilian Workforce .........
Improving funds management: unfilled positions ....
AF Integrated Personnel and Pay System (AF–IPPS) .........
Improving funds management: fiscal year 2012
funds available for development ..........................
Anti-Tamper Technology Executive Agency .........................
Improving funds management: forward financing ...
B–52 Squadrons .................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: 1760 Internal
Weapons Bay Upgrade—flight test delay ............
MQ–9 UAV ...........................................................................
Improving funds management: forward financing ...
F–35 Squadrons .................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Follow-on Development—no approved Capabilities Development Document .....................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Developmental
Test and Evaluation—no approved Capabilities
Development Document .........................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: B61—no approved Capabilities Development Document ........
Tactical AIM Missiles ..........................................................
Improving funds management: forward financing ...

Fiscal year 2013
base

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

..........................
..........................

..........................
10,000

¥5,700
∂10,000

..........................
13,636
..........................
51,456

..........................
38,636
..........................
49,956

∂10,000
∂25,000
∂25,000
¥1,500

..........................
50

..........................
..........................

¥1,500
¥50

..........................
352,532

..........................
322,832

¥50
¥29,700

..........................
33,200

..........................
25,300

¥29,700
¥7,900

..........................
816,335

..........................
796,335

¥7,900
¥20,000

..........................
129,411

..........................
118,411

¥20,000
¥11,000

..........................
393,558

..........................
201,558

¥11,000
¥192,000

..........................
124,805

..........................
109,805

¥192,000
¥15,000

..........................
67,874

..........................
6,174

¥15,000
¥61,700

..........................
13,610

..........................
12,310

¥61,700
¥1,300

..........................
13,935

..........................
6,935

¥1,300
¥7,000

..........................
192,348
..........................
90,097

..........................
186,348
..........................
34,097

¥7,000
¥6,000
¥6,000
¥56,000

..........................
32,086
..........................
24,007

..........................
22,086
..........................
21,007

¥56,000
¥10,000
¥10,000
¥3,000

..........................
128,328
..........................
33,000

..........................
115,828
..........................
5,900

¥3,000
¥12,500
¥12,500
¥27,100

..........................

¥10,000

..........................

¥7,100

..........................
15,460
..........................

..........................
12,760
..........................

¥10,000
¥2,700
¥2,700

169
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

142

145

147

162
169
180

182

185
195

201
212
213

217
226
242

Program element title

Combat Rescue and Recovery ............................................
Air National Guard shortfall: HH–60 Smart MultiFunction Color Display ..........................................
Precision Attack Systems Procurement ..............................
Improving funds management: forward financing ...
Air National Guard shortfall: Sniper Digital Video ...
Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program ............
Improving funds management: JSF Component Improvement Program forward financing .................
Joint Surveillance/Target Attack Radar System [JSTARS] ..
Authorization adjustment: retain T–3 test aircraft ..
Cyber Command Activities .................................................
Improving funds management: forward financing ...
E–4B National Airborne Operations Center [NAOC] ...........
Maintaining program affordability: Low Frequency
Transmit System funds early to need ..................
Information Systems Security Program ..............................
Maintaining program affordability: concept refinement ......................................................................
Authorization adjustment: ASACoE program .............
MILSATCOM Terminals ........................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: FAB–T ............
Air Traffic Control, Approach, and Landing System
(ATCALS) .........................................................................
Air National Guard shortfall: Remotely Piloted Aircraft Ground Based Sense and Avoid ..................
Defense Joint Counterintelligence Activities ......................
Maintaining program affordability ............................
Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ...............................
Terminate ISIS ...........................................................
Airborne Reconnaissance Systems .....................................
Authorization adjustment: Blue Devil Replacement
WAMI/NVDF ............................................................
RQ–4 UAV ...........................................................................
Improving funds management: forward financing ...
NUDET Detection System (SPACE) ......................................
Improving funds management: prior year carryover
Logistics Information Technology [LOGIT] ..........................
Maintaining program affordability: delay transformational projects ..............................................
Classified Programs ...........................................................
Classified adjustment ...............................................

Fiscal year 2013
base

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

2,582

6,882

∂4,300

..........................
1,075
..........................
..........................
139,369

..........................
2,000
..........................
..........................
109,969

∂4,300
∂925
¥1,075
∂2,000
¥29,400

..........................
13,248
..........................
68,099
..........................
18,267

..........................
23,148
..........................
38,099
..........................
13,267

¥29,400
∂9,900
∂9,900
¥30,000
¥30,000
¥5,000

..........................
90,231

..........................
96,331

¥5,000
∂6,100

..........................
..........................
140,170
..........................

..........................
..........................
95,170
..........................

¥3,900
∂10,000
¥45,000
¥45,000

35,674

39,174

∂3,500

..........................
330
..........................
3,000
..........................
37,828

..........................
10
..........................
..........................
..........................
50,328

∂3,500
¥320
¥320
¥3,000
¥3,000
∂12,500

..........................
134,406
..........................
50,547
..........................
95,238

..........................
110,406
..........................
42,547
..........................
60,478

∂12,500
¥24,000
¥24,000
¥8,000
¥8,000
¥34,760

..........................
11,874,528
..........................

..........................
11,664,528
..........................

¥34,760
¥210,000
¥210,000

Operationally Responsive Space.—The Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2013, provided $105,000,000 for continuation of
the Operationally Responsive Space program, in accordance with
the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act [NDAA].
The Air Force proposed to acquire a low-cost weather satellite,
which would leverage prior investments in bus and sensor programs, which the Committee supported.
However, this plan has not been approved by the Department of
Defense despite the identification of a key requirements gap in
weather data collection. The failure to provide a path forward for
the Operationally Responsive Space program stands in stark contrast to the congressional rejection of the fiscal year 2013 proposal
to terminate the program.
The Committee finds that the Operationally Responsive Space
program is an important pathfinder to fielding future satellite capabilities at an affordable cost. The Committee directs the Sec-

170
retary of the Air Force to provide the congressional defense committees with a report describing the plans for executing the available funding consistent with the mandates of the Department of
Defense Appropriations Act, 2013 and the Fiscal Year 2013 NDAA
within 30 days after enactment of this act.
Family of Advanced Beyond-Line-of-Sight Terminals [FAB–T].—
The Air Force has adopted a competitive acquisition strategy for
the final development and procurement of FAB–T systems. The key
event in this acquisition will be a source selection between two terminal solutions in early fiscal year 2014.
The Committee supports competitive acquisition strategies to
provide best value to the Government and has supported the necessary funds for development of both FAB–T systems. However, the
Committee is concerned that there is not adequate visibility on several aspects of the acquisition strategy, including requirements definition and the basis for evaluation of two technologies at different
states of maturity.
Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction of
$45,000,000 from Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air
Force, and $45,000,000 from Other Procurement, Air Force.
Combat Rescue Helicopter.—For fiscal year 2014, the Air Force
requests $393,558,000 to begin the engineering, manufacturing,
and development phase of the combat rescue helicopter. The Committee recommends $201,558,000, a reduction of $192,000,000, due
to a delay in contract award. The Committee fully supports this
mission but believes replacement of the existing HH–60G fleet can
be accomplished in a less costly manner.
Of the amount the Air Force requests in fiscal year 2014,
$245,000,000 is budgeted to buy two commercially available helicopters, as well as procuring and integrating the mission equipment. The Committee strongly believes that paying $122,500,000
for an in-production helicopter, even with integrated mission equipment, is excessive. Further, the Air Force plans to spend nearly
$1,400,000,000 for development and test of nine helicopters followed by a procurement program that currently shows an average
procurement unit cost of $81,000,000 per helicopter. In the current
fiscal environment, the Department should be seeking innovative
ways to recapitalize the HH–60 fleet with platforms having affordable unit costs.
In the fiscal year 2011 Senate appropriations report 111–295,
this Committee zeroed out funding for the HH–60 Recapitalization
program and expressed concern that the Air Force’s plan could
produce results similar to the wasted $200,000,000 spent on the
Combat Search and Rescue-X program. The Committee is concerned that the Air Force may be heading down the same path and
wants to fully understand the cost of all mission and acquisition alternatives. Therefore, the Committee directs the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation to provide, not later than 90 days after enactment of this act, a briefing
to the congressional defense committees on a business case analysis
of the combat rescue helicopter. This analysis shall examine the
cost of all mission alternatives in addition to alternative acquisition
strategies to include utilizing existing contract vehicles and post
production modifications.

171
Logistics Information Technology.—The Air Force requests
$95,238,000 to remediate and modernize legacy logistics information technology systems to meet the 2017 auditability mandate as
well as pursue transformational initiatives that will eventually replace the legacy systems. The Committee fully supports the Air
Force’s efforts to remediate and modernize legacy systems to meet
the 2017 mandate—but questions the timing of pursuing transformational initiatives.
After spending $1,030,000,000 over several years to replace the
legacy logistics systems with the expeditionary combat support system [ECSS], the Air Force terminated ECSS because an additional
$1,100,000,000 was needed to field 25 percent of the original ECSS
capability. As a potential root cause of the failure to deliver ECSS,
the Air Force sites ‘‘lack of enterprise resource planning [ERP] program management skills within government.’’ Given this assessment, the Committee believes the Air Force should focus their
skilled program managers on projects that help the Air Force
achieve auditability in 2017 rather than on efforts that deliver
much later. Therefore, the Committee denies the request to begin
transformational initiatives and reduces logistics information technology by $34,760,000.
High Capacity Optical Wireless Communications for Remotely Piloted Vehicles.—The Committee supports Air Force development of
secure, high-bandwidth communications technologies for assured
communications networks and covertness in tactical environments,
including free-space optical technology. Recognizing the military’s
increasing reliance on tactical and intelligence data from remotely
piloted air vehicles, and that transmission capacity is already limited by radio frequency spectrum and bandwidth, the Air Force is
encouraged to continue development and demonstration of next
generation free-space optical communications for remotely piloted
air vehicles.
Engine Sensor Technology Research.—The Committee is aware
that ongoing research regarding dynamic engine sensors for military aircraft may increase safety and decrease operation and
sustainment costs if the technology is fully matured. The Committee encourages the Department to continue to support innovative research on engine sensor technology with the goal of improving performance, safety, and fuel efficiency.
Ground Based Radar Technologies.—The Committee understands
that the Air Force, Marine Corps, and the Army are each considering the procurement of new ground radar solutions. The Committee applauds the Marine Corps for pursuing a flexible, multimission radar. Given the fiscally constrained budgetary environment, the Committee encourages the Department of Defense to
carefully examine the services’ ground-based radar acquisition
strategies to ensure procurement of the most affordable and most
efficient solution that meets the warfighter requirements. The
Committee believes the Department should consider leveraging
available technology and focus on efficiency and affordability to potentially lower lifecycle costs, accelerate deployment schedules, and
reduce programmatic risk.
Human Optimization of Autonomous Systems.—Unmanned Aerial Systems have rapidly advanced to become invaluable to national

172
defense. The Committee praises the Air Force for its forward leaning approach to evolving this technology as requirements change
and the threat adapts. Autonomous systems, the next stage in that
evolution, will demand testing and evaluation systems and procedures that are developed solely for their unique requirements. The
Committee encourages the Air Force to invest in the development
of test and evaluation capabilities for autonomy based systems.
Sensors Research by Air Force Minority Leaders Program.—The
Committee encourages the Air Force Research Laboratory to carry
out sensors research activities conducted by the Air Force Minority
Leaders Program for research in the disciplines of materials and
processing, sensors, and related enabling academic specialties, and
to meet critical defense capabilities, science and technology, future
workforce, and technical program objectives for the Air Force.
Aerospace Propulsion.—The Committee is aware that ongoing research regarding dynamic engine sensors for military aircraft may
increase safety and decrease operation and sustainment costs if the
technology is fully matured. The Committee encourages the Department to continue to support innovative research on engine sensor technology with the goal of improving performance, safety, and
fuel efficiency.
MQ–1 and MQ–9 Sense and Avoid Capability Development.—The
Committee recommendation includes $115,828,000 for enhancements to the MQ–9 Reaper remotely piloted aircraft [RPA]. Of the
amount provided, no funds were requested by the Air Force for development of a sense and avoid capability. The Committee notes
that the Air Force intends to base a portion of the overall fleet of
MQ–1 and MQ–9 RPAs in the United States in the future, and that
the scope of operations of any such aircraft would substantially depend on domestic rules currently under development by the Federal Aviation Administration. Specifically, absent any sense and
avoid capability, the MQ–1 and MQ–9 aircraft could be largely restricted to restricted military airspace, which would greatly limit
their potential use in support of domestic authorities in the event
of a natural disaster or other domestic emergency. As a result, the
Committee encourages the Air Force to examine options for a sense
and avoid capability for MQ–1 and MQ–9 RPAs, and to include a
sense and avoid development effort in future year budget requests.
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... $18,607,358,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 17,667,108,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 17,695,487,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,695,487,000.
This is $28,379,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

173
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE-WIDE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8
9
11
13
14
15
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

28
29
30
31
32

32X
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
45
46
47
48

BASIC RESEARCH
DTRA UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BASIC RESEARCH ..
DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................
BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES ......................................................
BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE ....................
NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM ..................................
HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIV (HBCU) ........................
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................

45,837
315,033
11,171
49,500
84,271
30,895
51,426

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH ................................................

588,133

........................

APPLIED RESEARCH
JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ....................................................
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ............................................................
LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM ..............................
APPLIED RESEARCH FOR ADVANCEMENT S&T PRIORITIES ...........
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ...................
COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS .................................................
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE ...................................................
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................
CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH .......................................................
HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB)
APP ...........................................................................................
TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY ................................................................
MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................
ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY .........................................................
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES ........
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE .............................................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ....................

20,065
114,790
46,875
45,000
413,260
16,330
24,537
227,065
18,908

20,065
114,790
41,875
30,000
400,760
16,330
24,537
227,065
18,908

........................
........................
¥5,000
¥15,000
¥12,500
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................
225,977
166,654
243,469
175,282
11,107
29,246

2,500
207,977
166,654
228,469
175,282
11,107
29,246

∂2,500
¥18,000
........................
¥15,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH .............................................

1,778,565

1,715,565

¥63,000

26,646
19,420
77,792

26,646
19,420
102,792

........................
........................
∂25,000

274,033
309,203
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
19,305

274,033
9,321
6,919
36,142
53,208
43,000
19,188
70,000
19,305

........................
¥299,882
∂6,919
∂36,142
∂53,208
∂43,000
∂19,188
∂70,000
........................

7,565
40,426
149,804
172,546

7,565
40,426
134,804
132,546

........................
........................
¥15,000
¥40,000

170,847
9,009
174,428
20,000
19,668

170,847
9,009
174,428
5,000
19,668

........................
........................
........................
¥15,000
........................

........................

2,500

∂2,500

34,041
61,971

59,041
61,971

∂25,000
........................

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECH INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS
AD .............................................................................................
SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ................................................
COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT ........................
COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIF PREV & DEFEAT ..........................................................................................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ..................................
ADVANCED CONCEPTS ..................................................................
DISCRIMINATION ............................................................................
WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................
ADVANCED C4ISR ..........................................................................
ADVANCED RESEARCH ..................................................................
COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ..........................................
JOINT DOD–DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ..........
AGILE TRANSPO FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER
CA .............................................................................................
SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY .....................................
ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS ................................................
SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ..........................................
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED
DEV ...........................................................................................
JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...............................
JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS .....................
NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES .............................
CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH .....................................
HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB)
ADV ...........................................................................................
DEFENSE–WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
PROG ........................................................................................
EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ...............

174
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

50
51
52
53
54
55
57
59
60
61
62
63
65
66
69
70
71
72

GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS .........
DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY ......
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM .....................
MICROELECTRONIC
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
AND
SUPPORT ...................................................................................
JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM .....................................................
ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES ....................................
COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .............
NETWORK–CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ...............................
SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ..................................................................
DISTRIBUTED
LEARNING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT ..........................................................................
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE .............................................
QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS ...........................................
JOINT EXPERIMENTATION ..............................................................
MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE .....................
TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ............................
OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT ......................
CWMD SYSTEMS ............................................................................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ..
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ............

75
76
77
79
80
81
82
83
84
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105

108
110
111
112
115

DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION
NUCLEAR
AND
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................
RETRACT LARCH ...........................................................................
WALKOFF .......................................................................................
ADVANCE SENSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM ................................
ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ........................................................................................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT .......
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT ...
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS ........................................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING PROGRAMS ....................
SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA ..........................................................
AEGIS BMD ....................................................................................
SPACE SURVEILLANCE & TRACKING SYSTEM ...............................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS ...........
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE C2BMC ...........................................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT ........
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INTERGRATION AND OPERATIONS
CENTER (MDIOC) ......................................................................
REGARDING TRENCH .....................................................................
SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) ...............................................
ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS ...............................................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST ...............................................
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS .........................................
HUMANITARIAN DEMINING .............................................................
COALITION WARFARE .....................................................................
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM ......................
ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES .......................................
DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................
WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE ...........................................................
HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB)
RES ...........................................................................................
DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION FUND ..............................................
JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .......................................................
JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION & INTEROPERABILITY TEAM ...............
LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) ........................................................
AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO–DEVELOPMENT .................................
JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM ............

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

20,000
30,256
72,324

........................
........................
........................

82,700
8,431
117,080
239,078
259,006
286,364

82,700
8,431
107,080
239,078
259,006
276,364

........................
........................
¥10,000
........................
........................
¥10,000

12,116
19,008
78,532
12,667
41,370
92,508
52,001
52,053
46,809

12,116
19,008
68,532
12,667
41,370
92,508
52,001
55,053
46,809

........................
........................
¥10,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂3,000
........................

3,109,007

2,993,082

¥115,925

63,641
19,152
70,763
17,230

53,641
19,152
70,763
19,230

¥10,000
........................
........................
∂2,000

71,453
268,990
1,033,903
196,237
315,183
377,605
286,613
937,056
44,947
6,515
418,355
47,419

71,453
268,990
891,047
181,237
345,183
377,605
286,613
910,056
44,947
6,515
405,515
47,419

........................
........................
¥142,856
¥15,000
∂30,000
........................
........................
¥27,000
........................
........................
¥12,840
........................

52,131
13,864
44,478
95,782
375,866
495,257
11,704
9,842
3,312
130,000

52,131
13,864
44,478
268,782
375,866
495,257
11,704
9,842
23,312
130,000

........................
........................
........................
∂173,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂20,000
........................

8,300
30,000

........................
........................

........................
........................
7,402
7,506
129,374
308,522
3,169

2,500
150,000
7,402
7,506
129,374
308,522
3,169

∂2,500
∂150,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

175
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

116

118
119
120
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134

159
160
161
162
164
165
167
168
172
175
178
179
180

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE .........................................................

946

........................

TOTAL, DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION ..........................

5,902,517

6,072,321

∂169,804

8,155
65,440
451,306
29,138
19,475
12,901
13,812
386
3,763
6,788

8,155
65,440
421,306
29,138
19,475
12,901
13,812
386
3,763
6,788

........................
........................
¥30,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

27,917
22,297
51,689
6,184
12,083

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

3,302

........................

734,636

704,636

¥30,000

6,393
2,479
240,213
2,127
8,287
31,000
24,379
54,311
47,462
........................
12,134
44,237
5,871
5,028
6,301
6,504
92,046

6,393
2,479
240,213
2,127
8,287
31,000
24,379
54,311
47,462
106,000
12,134
44,237
5,871
5,028
6,301
6,504
92,046

1,868
8,362
56,024

1,868
8,362
46,024

........................
........................
¥10,000

6,908
15,451
71,659
4,083
5,306
2,097
8,394
7,624

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

43,247
37,712
607

........................
........................
........................

54,914

........................

ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT
NUCLEAR
AND
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT ...............................................................................
PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT ..................
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................
ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS–JPO) .....
JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) ....
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES ...........
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................
HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE ..............................
DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM .............................................
OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ........................................
DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ..........................................................................................
DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION .................................................
DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES FINANCIAL SYSTEM ......................
DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITY ............
GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .............................................
DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
(EEIM) .......................................................................................
TOTAL, ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................................

135
136
137
138
139
140
141
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
158

2014 budget
estimate

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) ......................
JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT ...........................
CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT ....
ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS ................................................
THERMAL VICAR ............................................................................
JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) ............
TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS ............................
FOREIGN MATERIAL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION ..................
JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ........
CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USD(P) ......................................................
FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING ..................................................
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ................................................................
STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT ................................................
NUCLEAR MATTERS—PHYSICAL SECURITY ..................................
SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION ..........
GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) ...............................
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................
SMALL
BUSINESS
INNOVATION
RESEARCH/CHALLENGE
ADMINISTR ................................................................................
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS ................................................
DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) ....................
R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING &
EVALUATION ..............................................................................
DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION .........................................
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT) ...
BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS .......................................
OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) ..................................................
JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT ..............................................
SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES ........
INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) ......
COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION. ..............................................................................
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS—MDA .........................................
IT SOFTWARE DEV INITIATIVES ......................................................
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................

176
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..........................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

913,028

1,009,028

∂96,000

7,552

........................

3,270

........................

287
14,000
1,955
13,250

........................
........................
........................
........................

13,026
12,652
3,061
72,726
6,524
512

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

12,867
36,565

10,867
30,565

¥2,000
¥6,000

13,144
1,060
33,279
10,673
181,567
34,288
7,741
3,325
1,246
5,147
17,352
3,658
9,752
3,210
21,602
5,195
3,348
641
2,338

13,144
1,060
33,279
10,673
181,567
34,288
7,741
3,325
1,246
5,147
17,352
3,658
9,752
4,210
21,602
5,195
3,348
641
2,338

4,372
24,691
4,659
3,533
1,314
156,561
7,705
42,620
17,970
7,424
2,206
18,325
3,304
16,021

4,372
24,691
4,659
3,533
13,314
156,561
7,705
42,620
17,970
7,424
2,206
18,325
3,304
16,021

........................
........................
........................
........................
∂12,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

247
248
249
250
254
256
257
261
262
268
271
274
275

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) .........................................
REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH & PARTNERSHIP FOR
PEAC .........................................................................................
OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION
SY .............................................................................................
INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT .........
OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................................
GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT ..........
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS
D) ..............................................................................................
JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ................................
PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM .........................................
C4I INTEROPERABILITY .................................................................
JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING .........................
NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT .............
DEFENSE
INFO
INFRASTRUCTURE
ENGINEERING
&
INTEGRATION ............................................................................
LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS (DCS) ..........................................
MINIMUM
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK ..................................................................................
PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) ............................................
KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) .................................
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ..............................
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ..............................
GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................
JOINT SPECTRUM CENTER ............................................................
NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ..............................
JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE .........................................
TELEPORT PROGRAM .....................................................................
SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES ..............................
CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE .........................................................
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) ...........................
POLICY R&D PROGRAMS ...............................................................
NET CENTRICITY ............................................................................
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................
DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................
MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV ...............................................................
HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM ...........
INT’L
INTELLIGENCE
TECHNOLOGY
ASSESSMENT,
ADVANCEMENT ..........................................................................
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .........................................................
LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS) ...........................................
MQ–9 UAV .....................................................................................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEV .........
SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS .............................................
WARRIOR SYSTEMS .......................................................................
SPECIAL PROGRAMS .....................................................................
SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES ...............................................................
SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ........................................................
SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ............................
SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ......................
TOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ..............

867,518

872,518

∂5,000

999

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................

3,773,704

3,740,204

¥33,500

TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DEFWIDE ............................................................................

17,667,108

17,695,487

∂28,379

182
183
184
185
186
187
188
190
191
192
194
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
210
211
212
213
214
216
220
221
225
227
230
233
235
238
239

177
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

11
13
14
21
22
24
30
32
32A
32B

32C

32D

32E

32F

38
42
46

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Lincoln Laboratory Research Program ..........................................
Authorization adjustment ....................................................
Applied Research for the Advancement of S&T Priorities ...........
Authorization adjustment: PSC S&T reduction ....................
Information & Communications Technology .................................
Authorization adjustment: Plan X increase .........................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program growth .......
Human, Social and Culture Behavior Modeling [HSCB] Applied
Research ...................................................................................
Authorization adjustment: HSCB Applied Research ............
Tactical Technology ......................................................................
Program cancellation ...........................................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carry over .........
Electronics Technology ..................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Program growth .......
Improving funds management: Prior year carry over .........
Combating Terrorism Technology Support ....................................
Restore unjustified reduction ..............................................
Ballistic Missile Defense Technology ...........................................
Improving funds management: Transfer funds to lines
32A–F for execution ........................................................
Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment .....................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment ........
Discrimination Sensor Technology ................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Discrimination Sensor Technology ..................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Discrimination Algorithms ...............................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Space Sensor Technology ................................................
Weapons Technology .....................................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
High Power Directed Energy ............................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Solid DACS ......................................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Advanced Interceptor Technology ....................................
Advanced C4ISR ...........................................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Advanced C4ISR ..............................................................
Advanced Research ......................................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Advanced Research .........................................................
Common Kill Vehicle Technology ..................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer from line 32 for
Common Kill Vehicle Technologies .................................
Advanced Aerospace Systems ......................................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...........
Program termination: Integrated Sensor is Structure
(ISIS) ................................................................................
Space Programs and Technology .................................................
Program termination: SeeMe ...............................................
Program termination: System F6 .........................................
Networked Communications Capabilities .....................................
Authorization adjustment: Net Comm reduction .................
Human, Social and Culture Behavior Modeling [HSCB] Advanced Development ................................................................
Authorization adjustment: HSCB Advanced Development ...

46,875
........................
45,000
........................
413,260
........................
........................

41,875
........................
30,000
........................
400,760
........................
........................

¥5,000
¥5,000
¥15,000
¥15,000
¥12,500
∂2,500
¥15,000

........................
........................
225,977
........................
........................
243,469
........................
........................
77,792
........................
309,203

2,500
........................
207,977
........................
........................
228,469
........................
........................
102,792
........................
9,321

∂2,500
∂2,500
¥18,000
¥10,000
¥8,000
¥15,000
¥10,000
¥5,000
∂25,000
∂25,000
¥299,882

........................
........................

........................
6,919

¥299,882
∂6,919

........................
........................

........................
36,142

∂6,919
∂36,142

........................

∂18,742

........................

∂6,500

........................
........................

........................
53,208

∂10,900
∂53,208

........................

∂22,944

........................

∂24,000

........................
........................

........................
43,000

∂6,264
∂43,000

........................
........................

........................
19,188

∂43,000
∂19,188

........................
........................

........................
70,000

∂19,188
∂70,000

........................
149,804
........................

........................
134,804
........................

∂70,000
¥15,000
¥10,000

........................
172,546
........................
........................
20,000
........................

........................
132,546
........................
........................
5,000
........................

¥5,000
¥40,000
¥10,000
¥30,000
¥15,000
¥15,000

........................
........................

2,500
........................

∂2,500
∂2,500

178
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

55
60
63
71
75

79
82

101
105

106
120

145

Item

Defense-Wide Manufacturing Science and Technology Program .........................................................................................
Authorization adjustment: Industrial Base Initiative
Fund ................................................................................
Advanced Electronics Technologies ..............................................
Improving funds management: Prior year carryover ...........
Sensor Technology ........................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Eliminate program
growth .............................................................................
Quick Reaction Special Projects ...................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Eliminate program
growth .............................................................................
CWMD Systems .............................................................................
Authorization adjustment: CWMD Systems .........................
Nuclear and Conventional Physical Security Equipment RDT&E
ADC&P ......................................................................................
Budget documentation disparity: Poor justification materials .................................................................................
Advanced Sensors Application Program .......................................
Authorization adjustment ....................................................
Ballistic Missile Defense Midcourse Defense Segment ...............
Improving funds management: Transfer sustainment
funds to operation and maintenance, defense-wide for
execution .........................................................................
Chemical and Biological Defense Program—Dem/Val ................
Restoring acquisition accountability: NGCS Schedule delay ....................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: VAC FILO Schedule
delay ................................................................................
Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors ................................................
Maintain Cobra Judy to augment discrimination capability ....................................................................................
AEGIS BMD ....................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Aegis BMD 5.1 development cost growth ....................................................
Ballistic Missile Defense Command and Control, Battle Management and Communication ..................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Lack of Spiral 8.2x
baseline ...........................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Spiral 8.4 deferred
by MDA ............................................................................
Israeli Cooperative Programs .......................................................
Israeli Upper tier .................................................................
Israeli Arrow program ..........................................................
Short range ballistic missile defense .................................
Department of Defense Corrosion Program ..................................
Program increase .................................................................
Human, Social and Culture Behavior Modeling [HSCB] Research
and Engineering .......................................................................
Authorization adjustment ....................................................
Defense Rapid Innovation Program ..............................................
Authorization adjustment ....................................................
Chemical and Biological Defense Program—EMD ......................
Restoring acquisition accountability: JEM milestone B
delay ................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: JBTDS milestone B
delay ................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: CALS milestone B
delay ................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: HFV milestone B
delay ................................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: VAC BOT execution
delay ................................................................................
Classified Program USD(P) ...........................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

34,041

59,041

∂25,000

........................
117,080
........................
286,364

........................
107,080
........................
276,364

∂25,000
¥10,000
¥10,000
¥10,000

........................
78,532

........................
68,532

¥10,000
¥10,000

........................
52,053
........................

........................
55,053
........................

¥10,000
∂3,000
∂3,000

63,641

53,641

¥10,000

........................
17,230
........................
1,033,903

........................
19,230
........................
891,047

¥10,000
∂2,000
∂2,000
¥142,856

........................
196,237

........................
181,237

¥142,856
¥15,000

........................

¥5,000

........................
315,183

........................
345,183

¥10,000
∂30,000

........................
937,056

........................
910,056

∂30,000
¥27,000

........................

¥27,000

418,355

405,515

¥12,840

........................

¥5,937

........................
95,782
........................
........................
........................
3,312
........................

........................
268,782
........................
........................
........................
23,312
........................

¥6,903
∂173,000
∂22,100
∂33,700
∂117,200
∂20,000
∂20,000

........................
........................
........................
........................
451,306

2,500
........................
150,000
........................
421,306

∂2,500
∂2,500
∂150,000
∂150,000
¥30,000

........................

¥2,000

........................

¥4,000

........................

¥7,000

........................

¥10,000

........................
........................

........................
106,000

¥7,000
∂106,000

179
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

160
202
203
225

250

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Program increase .................................................................
Defense Technical Information Center [DTIC] ..............................
Authorization adjustment: DTIC reduction ..........................
Defense Info Infrastructure Engineering and Integration ............
Improving Funds Management: Prior year carryover ..........
Long-Haul Communications—DCS ..............................................
Improving Funds Management: Prior year carryover ..........
Policy R&D Programs ....................................................................
Authorization adjustment: Conflict Records Research Center ....................................................................................
MQ–9 UAV .....................................................................................
Authorization adjustment: MQ–9 UAV .................................
Classified Programs .....................................................................
Classified adjustment .........................................................

........................
56,024
........................
12,867
........................
36,565
........................
3,210

........................
46,024
........................
10,867
........................
30,565
........................
4,210

∂106,000
¥10,000
¥10,000
¥2,000
¥2,000
¥6,000
¥6,000
∂1,000

........................
1,314
........................
3,773,704
........................

........................
13,314
........................
3,740,204
........................

∂1,000
∂12,000
∂12,000
¥33,500
¥33,500

Conventional Prompt Global Strike.—The fiscal year 2014 budget
request includes $65,440,000 to continue the Prompt Global Strike
[PGS] program, a decrease from $200,383,000 appropriated in fiscal
year 2013. The Committee continues to support development of a
PGS capability but recognizes the challenges associated with
hypersonic flight. For example, after two failed flight tests, the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency determined that critical
technologies associated with hypersonic test vehicle–2 were not mature enough to proceed to more advanced flight testing. However,
the Committee notes the Army conducted a successful flight test of
the advanced hypersonic weapon [AHW] on November, 17, 2011.
Considering recent test outcomes and the growing possibility of
near term threats, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense
to follow through on the stated intent of additional fiscal year 2013
funding provided for continued planning and completion of a second, longer range AHW flight test. Also considering the fiscal constraints under which the Department is operating, the Committee
directs the Secretary to avoid commitments that will cause funds
to be used for design or development efforts intended to support a
significant departure from HTV–2 or the Army’s AHW payload delivery vehicle designs.
Under Vehicle Scanning Technologies.—The Committee believes
that improving under vehicle scanning technologies to mitigate
threats and improve access to military installations should be a
priority. The Committee recommends that the Department of Defense develop and test systems for automated under vehicle scanning to improve entry security.
Corrosion Resistance and Non-Skid Compliance.—The Committee
recommends that the Department of Defense Corrosion Program
advance Navy fuel and ballast tank corrosion monitoring and nonskid coating compliance efforts throughout the Department of Defense’s maintenance community.
Assured Microelectronics.—The Committee understands that the
Department of Defense issued an instruction which mandates assurance measures for all information and weapons systems that
are national security systems, mission assurance category one, or
are otherwise critical military and intelligence systems. The Committee directs the Department to deliver a report within 180 days

180
of the enactment of this act on the progress implementing this assured microelectronics policy.
Lightweight Vehicle Protection.—As the Department becomes
more environmentally friendly, hybrid and electronically powered
vehicles with reduced weight allowances may require tradeoffs in
protection, payload and performance that could place troops at risk.
The Committee recommends that the Department of Defense develop lighter weight protection systems optimized for such vehicles.
Open Access to Federal Research.—The Committee is concerned
that despite significant Federal investments in scientific research,
public access to the published results are limited. Improved access
to cutting edge research will help individuals and commercial enterprises more rapidly translate research results into new products
and services. To that end, the Committee encourages the Department of Defense to continue its actions to execute the Federal research public access policy recommendations as outlined by the Office of Science and Technology Policy in an effort to increase public
access to published scientific research.
Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program [CTEIP] Range
Upgrades.—The Committee is concerned with the condition of the
high speed test tracks at military test ranges. These tracks provide
significant missile and missile component validation which can at
times eliminate costly tests using air launched vehicles. Therefore,
the Committee encourages the Department of Defense, through the
Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program, to develop
ground test range upgrades that provide low vibration Mach 3
speeds for testing of advanced missiles and their components,
launch vehicles, or other space systems.
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY

Ballistic Missile Defense Technology.—The fiscal year 2014 budget request includes $309,203,000 for ballistic missile defense technology research, an increase of $233,228,000, or 307 percent, over
amounts appropriated in fiscal year 2013. The Missile Defense
Agency plans to execute these funds for six distinct projects, each
containing multiple subprojects. However, the requested budget increase is not sustained in future years. Therefore, to ensure appropriate oversight among the many projects MDA plans to pursue,
and to improve the financial management of technology research
funds, the Committee transfers funds requested in fiscal year 2014
to six separate project elements, consistent with MDA’s budget justification.
Acquisition Accountability in Development Programs.—The fiscal
year 2014 budget request includes $937,056,000 to continue the development of multiple spirals of Aegis ballistic missile defense
[BMD] capabilities. While the Committee notes the repeated success of the Aegis weapons system, the budget request includes
roughly $500,000,000 for the concurrent development of Aegis BMD
4.0, Aegis BMD 5.0, and Aegis BMD 5.1. Since 2007, MDA has obligated over $450,000,000 for development of Aegis BMD 5.1, and
the budget request for Aegis BMD 5.1 in fiscal year 2014 is
$239,000,000. Despite the significant investment made to date in
Aegis BMD 5.1 and the funding increase requested in fiscal year
2014, MDA has not completed an acquisition program baseline for

181
Aegis BMD 5.1. Further, the Government Accountability Office in
its April 2013 report identified unstable baselines as well as cost
growth in the Aegis program. Therefore, the Committee does not
fully support the increase sought for Aegis BMD 5.1, and recommends a reduction of $27,000,000.
In addition, the fiscal year 2014 budget request includes
$418,355,000 for continued development of BMD command and
control, battle management and communications [C2BMC]. The
Committee fully supports the continued development of C2BMC.
However, the request includes $6,903,000 for spiral 8.4 which has
been deferred by MDA, and $6,937,000 to initiate a new spiral
(8.2x) for which MDA has budgeted over $120,000,000 over the
next 5 years. Furthermore, no cost or schedule baseline for spiral
8.2x has been established. Given the repeated adjustments to
MDA’s software development program baselines in recent years,
the Committee does not find it appropriate to establish yet another
new development spiral without first establishing cost and schedule baselines. Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction to
the request for spiral 8.2x. The Committee notes that this does not
affect the continued development and fielding of spirals 6.4 and 8.2.
Sharing of Classified United States Ballistic Missile Defense Information With the Russian Federation.—The Committee is concerned with the potential security risks associated with sharing
sensitive U.S. missile defense data and technology with the Russian Federation. The Committee recognizes existing law restricts
the sharing of sensitive and classified ballistic missile defense information with the Russian Federation, as cited in Public Law 112–
81, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.
The Committee expects the administration to continue to adhere to
current law, until superseded by any provision of an act authorizing appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year
2014 relating to this issue.
OPERATIONAL TEST

AND

EVALUATION, DEFENSE

$223,473,000
186,300,000
186,300,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $186,300,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

75,720
48,423

........................
........................

OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE
1
2

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION ..........................................
LIVE FIRE TESTING ........................................................................

75,720
48,423

182
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES ...........................

62,157

........................

TOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..........................

186,300

........................

TOTAL, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE ..........................................................................

186,300

........................

TITLE V
REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS
DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS
Appropriations, 2013 1 2 .........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................

$1,538,383,000
1,545,827,000
1,695,827,000

1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.
emergency funding of $24,200,000 in the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013
(division A of Public Law 113–2).
2 Includes

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,695,827,000.
This is $150,000,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Prepositioned War Reserve Stocks .............................................................
Arsenal Initiative ...............................................................................

25,158
........................

175,158
........................

∂150,000
∂150,000

Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Army ................................

25,158

175,158

∂150,000

Supplies and Materials (Medical/Dental) ..................................................

61,731

........................

Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Air Force ..........................

61,731

........................

Defense Logistics Agency ..........................................................................

46,428

........................

Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide ..................

46,428

........................

Working Capital Fund—DECA ...................................................................

1,412,510

........................

Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide ..................

1,412,510

........................

Grand Total, Defense Working Capital Funds ..............................

1,545,827

1,695,827

∂150,000

Defense Logistics Agency Fair and Reasonable Pricing Analysis.—
A Department of Defense Inspector General’s [DODIG] recently
published audit report titled ‘‘Acquisition Processes and Contract
Management’’ [DODIG–2013–090] determined that Defense Logistics Agency [DLA] Aviation contracting officers did not routinely
conduct fair and reasonable pricing analysis when purchasing
spare parts. Therefore, wasteful spending resulted from agency personnel failing to negotiate good deals or to perform adequate oversight. The audit found that DLA Aviation paid approximately
$13,700,000 in excess of fair and reasonable prices for 1,469 orders.
(183)

184
This included a $10 device for which the defense contractor charged
$2,286 a piece. In another example, DLA paid $12,467 each for
metal tube assemblies that cover aircraft engine struts. The
DODIG review concluded that the agency should have paid a unit
price of approximately $1,167.
DLA is seeking a refund of $13,700,000 from the contractor for
the issues identified in the audit. However, the audit found that
‘‘DLA Aviation also may have made payments in excess of the fair
and reasonable price for an additional 20 delivery orders. If prices
are not corrected, DLA Aviation will continue to overpay on future
sole-source spare parts. . . . ’’ The Committee is concerned about
the lack of attention given to the review of pricing for spare parts
and believes the end customer, in this case the Air Force, needs to
improve its oversight in the process as well. A reduction has been
made to the Air Force operation and maintenance budget to account for savings that should be realized by the Air Force increasing its scrutiny of pricing for spare parts. Additionally, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the
congressional defense committees no later than 90 days after the
enactment of this act that examines the safeguards that are or
have been put in place to prevent future defense contractor overpricing.
NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$696,919,000
730,700,000
608,378,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $608,378,000.
This is $122,322,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

020

030

050
060
070
080
090

Item

MPF MLP .....................................................................................
Improving funds management: Transfer to SCN, line 12,
for full funding of AFSB #2 only, per Navy request ....
Improving funds management: Transfer to SCN, lines 16
and 20 only, for program shortfalls, per Navy request .............................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess to requirement ....
Post Delivery and Outfitting .......................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: MLP #3 outfitting
cost growth ...................................................................
LG Med Spd Ro/Ro Maintenance ................................................
DoD Mobilization Alterations ......................................................
TAH Maintenance ........................................................................
Research And Development ........................................................
Ready Reserve Force ...................................................................
Total, National Defense Sealift Fund ............................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

134,917

22,717

¥112,200

........................

¥55,300

........................
........................
43,404

........................
........................
33,282

¥31,000
¥25,900
¥10,122

........................
116,784
60,703
19,809
56,058
299,025

¥10,122
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

730,700

608,378

¥122,322

TITLE VI
OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $32,672,130,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 33,054,528,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 33,607,019,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $33,607,019,000.
This is $552,491,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
10
20
30
40
50
60
70

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE .................................................................
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT .........................................................
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................................
EDUCATION AND TRAINING ...........................................................
BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS ..........................................

8,880,738
15,842,732
2,505,640
1,450,619
368,248
733,097
1,872,660

8,885,629
15,797,732
2,505,640
1,454,219
368,248
733,097
1,872,660

∂4,891
¥45,000
........................
∂3,600
........................
........................
........................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................

31,653,734

31,617,225

¥36,509

PROCUREMENT
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM .........................................................

671,181

........................

RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM .........................................................

729,613

1,318,613

∂589,000

TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ...............................

33,054,528

33,607,019

∂552,491

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
request

Item

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ...........................................................
IN–HOUSE CARE ..........................................................................
Improving funds management: Pharmacy funding excess
to requirement ...............................................................

(185)

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

31,653,734
8,880,738

31,617,225
8,885,629

¥36,509
∂4,891

..........................

¥3,895

186
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
request

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

..........................
15,842,732

..........................
15,797,732

∂8,786
¥45,000

..........................

¥275,000

..........................

¥67,000

Special Operations psychological resiliency—transfer
from OM, DW .................................................................
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ...............................................................
Improving funds management: TRICARE historical underexecution ........................................................................
Improving funds management: Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth ...................................................................
Authorization adjustment: Restore proposed TRICARE fee
increases .......................................................................
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CARE ....................................................
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT .......................................................
Accelerate HAIMS initiative ................................................
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................................
EDUCATION AND TRAINING ..........................................................
BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS ................................
PROCUREMENT .....................................................................................
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................
Research and Development ........................................................
Peer-Reviewed Breast Cancer Research ............................
Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research .......................................
Peer-Reviewed Ovarian Cancer Research ..........................
Peer-Reviewed Prostate Cancer Research .........................
Peer-Reviewed Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological
Health Research ............................................................
Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program .......................
Joint Warfighter Medical Research ....................................
Orthotics and Prosthetics Outcomes Research .................

..........................
2,505,640
1,450,619
..........................
368,248
733,097
1,872,660
671,181
729,613
729,613
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................

..........................
2,505,640
1,454,219
..........................
368,248
733,097
1,872,660
671,181
1,318,613
729,613
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................

∂297,000
..........................
∂3,600
∂3,600
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
∂589,000
..........................
∂120,000
∂25,000
∂10,000
∂64,000

..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................

∂60,000
∂200,000
∂100,000
∂10,000

TOTAL .............................................................................

33,054,528

33,607,019

∂552,491

Defense Health Program Reprogramming Procedures.—The Committee remains concerned regarding the transfer of funds from direct (or in-house) care to pay for contractor-provided medical care.
To limit such transfers and improve oversight within the Defense
Health Program operation and maintenance account, the Committee includes a provision which caps the funds available for private sector care under the TRICARE program subject to prior approval reprogramming procedures. The provision and accompanying report language included by the Committee should not be
interpreted by the Department as limiting the amount of funds
that may be transferred to the direct care system from other budget activities within the Defense Health Program. In addition, the
Committee continues to designate the funding for the direct care
system as a special interest item. Any transfer of funds from the
direct (or in-house) care budget activity into the private sector care
budget activity or any other budget activity will require the Department of Defense to follow prior approval reprogramming procedures.
The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide written notification to the congressional defense committees of cumulative transfers in excess of $15,000,000 out of the private sector
care budget subactivity. The Committee further directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide quarterly reports to the congressional defense committees on budget execution
data for all of the Defense Health Program accounts and to adequately reflect changes to the budget activities requested by the
services in future budget submissions.

187
Carryover.—For fiscal year 2014, the Committee recommends 1
percent carryover authority for the operation and maintenance account of the Defense Health Program. The Committee directs the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to submit a detailed
spending plan for any fiscal year 2013 designated carryover funds
to the congressional defense committees not less than 30 days prior
to executing the carryover funds.
Private Sector Care Underexecution.—According to a review by
the Government Accountability Office, the Department underexecuted its private sector care budget by $1,356,245,000 in fiscal
year 2011 and $1,463,178,000 in fiscal year 2012, for an average
of 8.9 percent underexecution. The Committee notes that the Department included a reduction of $869,381,000 in its fiscal year
2014 budget request to account for lower than budgeted cost
growth in private sector care. However, given the continued trend
of prior-year underexecution, the Committee believes that additional savings can be realized and recommends a reduction of
$275,000,000 to the fiscal year 2014 budget request. The Committee urges the Department to submit future year budgets that
are more closely aligned with recent provided care patterns.
Collaboration with the Department of Veterans Affairs.—While
the Department of Defense [DOD] and the Department of Veterans
Affairs [VA] may have different missions, they are bound together
in a mutual mission to support those who have served in the defense of the country. Over the past several years, collaboration between the Departments has significantly increased and the number
of joint projects and services has expanded. The Committee applauds these efforts and believes that future information sharing
between DOD and VA must strengthen in order to ensure a seamless transition from active duty and timely access to VA benefits.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the transmission of service
treatment records from DOD to VA. These records are essential in
the VA’s process of making accurate and timely determinations of
benefits to which a veteran may be entitled.
The Committee has been deeply concerned that while cooperation
between the two Departments has significantly increased, delays in
information sharing still plague the system. In order to increase
the oversight of this process, the recommendation includes bill language directing the DOD Inspector General to work in coordination
with the VA Office of the Inspector General to assess the time it
takes for service treatment records to be transmitted to VA, impediments to providing the records in a useable electronic format,
and recommendations to streamline this process. The Committee
further directs that this report be submitted to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress no later than July 31,
2014.
The Committee understands that 43 percent of veterans from the
Iraq and Afghanistan wars were National Guard and Reserve
members and that Guard and Reserve records are often the most
difficult for the VA to obtain because many of these veterans saw
multiple, nonconsecutive deployments with different units. Currently, the VA must contact multiple individual units to collect
these records. The Committee encourages the Department of Defense to establish a central clearinghouse for Guard and Reserve

188
records in order to speed the transfer of these records and avoid
future anticipated backlogs.
The Committee also believes that continuing the transition from
a paper-based to an electronic system of record transfer is imperative in assisting the VA with providing benefits to veterans in a
timely manner. The Department of Defense is currently deploying
the Health Artifact Image Management Solution [HAIMS], which
provides DOD and VA healthcare clinicians global access and
awareness of images and documents generated during the
healthcare delivery process through the continuum of care. The
Committee provides an additional $3,600,000 in order to accelerate
this initiative and directs DOD to transmit all records electronically to the VA by the end of 2013.
In October 2010, DOD and VA established a first-of-its-kind partnership with the opening of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal
Health Care Center [FHCC]. This is a fully integrated Federal
healthcare facility that serves Active Duty military, their family
members, military retirees, and veterans. The Committee continues
to support the pilot program at FHCC and believes it will produce
valuable lessons that can be used to expand future collaboration
between DOD and VA hospitals as well as produce substantial savings to the taxpayer by combining the two healthcare systems
where practical.
integrated Electronic Health Record [iEHR].—The Committee is
frustrated with the disappointing effort displayed over the past
year by the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to continue development of an integrated Electronic Health Record
[iEHR]. Five years ago, full interoperability of electronic records
was mandated by the Congress. In 2011, the Departments decided
to replace their respective existing legacy electronic health record
systems and agreed to jointly develop an electronic health record
through the Interagency Program Office [IPO]. The original schedule estimated operating capability for iEHR by 2017.
In February 2013, because of cost and schedule issues, both Secretaries decided to take iEHR in a different strategic direction: focusing on creating an interoperable system and a subsequent integrated health record, rather than building a single integrated core
system as previously agreed. The Committee understands both Departments believe this new approach will result in a lower overall
cost of development and an accelerated timeline for completion.
However, the Committee remains concerned by the lack of a well
articulated plan forward and the lack of results of development to
date. For instance, the Committee has yet to receive a detailed
plan, including a timeline, benchmarks, or total cost for this major
project. The Committee strongly believes that the current environment of fragmented and stove-piped systems is not an acceptable
option. The Departments must develop and convey to the Committee a coherent path forward for the successful deployment of an
interoperable system and integrated electronic health record. Further, the IPO must be more transparent regarding day-to-day functioning, including articulating a clear governance structure and a
detailed plan to manage and maintain accountability on behalf of
both Departments. In short, the IPO must demonstrate to the Com-

189
mittee that it can produce substantial achievements and adhere to
a defined plan forward within the budget estimates.
Included in Public Law 113–6 is a prohibition on obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2013 funds for the development of iEHR
until the Departments submit to the Appropriations subcommittees
of jurisdiction a plan for expenditure that meets specifically outlined requirements. The Committee recently received and is currently reviewing the expenditure plan. Due to the Departments’ inability to obligate fiscal year 2013 iEHR development funds and
the lack of compliance with the requirements outlined in the bill,
the Committee continues to include bill language limiting the obligation or expenditure of funds to 25 percent for the development
of iEHR in fiscal year 2014 until both Departments provide the
subcommittees of jurisdiction an expenditure plan including a longterm roadmap for the life of the project, with annual and total
spending for each Department and quarterly milestones. The expenditure plan should also be submitted to the Government Accountability Office [GAO] for review.
The Committee continues to expect briefings from the IPO on a
quarterly basis providing a detailed explanation of the cost and
schedule of iEHR development, including milestones, knowledge
points, and acquisition timelines as it impacts both Departments,
as well as quarterly obligation reports. The Committee also directs
the Department of Defense to provide written notification to the
Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate prior to obligating any contract or combination of contracts in excess of
$5,000,000.
Finally, the Committee is troubled by the lack of transparency
the Department of Defense has shown regarding the information
used to inform the decision to change strategy on iEHR. The Committee directs the Director of the Office of Cost Assessment Program Evaluation [CAPE] to provide a report not later than 90 days
after enactment of this act that includes independent cost estimates for the following: the Department’s original plan of a single,
integrated electronic health record system; the Department adopting and modernizing the VA’s Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture [VistA]; and the Department
procuring a core system other than but interoperable with VistA.
Traumatic Brain Injury [TBI]/Psychological Health [PH].—The
Committee recommends $60,000,000 above the fiscal year 2014
budget request for continued research into treatment and prevention of traumatic brain injuries and improved psychological health.
Traumatic brain injury [TBI] has been identified as the signature
injury of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, but the long-term consequences of traumatic brain injury and the relationship between
post-traumatic stress, suicide, sexual assault, and alcohol and substance abuse are poorly understood. The Committee supports the
Department’s past research efforts into each of these individual
areas but encourages the Department to conduct research that
takes a more holistic view of these issues in order to better understand how they are interrelated and develop more effective treatment and prevention strategies.
The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Health Affairs) to submit a report to the congressional defense

190
committees within 180 days of enactment of this act on expenditure
and obligation data of additional funding added by Congress for
psychological health and traumatic brain injury. This report should
include information on agreements made with other Government
agencies.
Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program.—The Committee recommends $200,000,000 for a Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program. The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Service Surgeons General, to select medical research
projects of clear scientific merit and direct relevance to military
health. Research areas considered under this funding are restricted
to: acupuncture, alcohol and substance abuse, amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis, arthritis, autism, chronic migraine and post-traumatic
headache, congenital heart disease, DNA vaccine technology for
postexposure prophylaxis, duchenne muscular dystrophy, epilepsy,
food allergies, Fragile X syndrome, gulf war illness, inflammatory
bowel disease, interstitial cystitis, lupus, malaria, metabolic disease, multiple sclerosis, neurofibromatosis, orthopedics, pancreatitis, Parkinson’s, polycystic kidney disease, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, psychotropic medications, reconstructive transplantation,
respiratory health, rheumatoid arthritis, segmental bone defects,
spinal cord injury, tinnitus, tuberous sclerosis complex, and vision
research. The Committee emphasizes that the additional funding
provided under the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program shall
be devoted only to the purposes listed above.
The Committee remains supportive of the medical research being
conducted by the Department that yields medical breakthroughs
for servicemembers and often translates to the civilian population,
as well. Along with the basic research that is necessary in less mature research areas, the Committee encourages the Department to
pursue advanced research and translational research projects when
appropriate. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) to provide a report to the congressional defense committees within 180 days of enactment of this Act on the
breakdown of funding in the Congressionally Directed Medical Research program between basic and advanced research.
Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program.—The Committee
recommends $100,000,000 for the Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program. Funds shall be used to augment and accelerate
high priority Department of Defense and service medical requirements and to continue prior year initiatives that are close to
achieving their objectives and yielding a benefit to military medicine. These funds shall not be used for new projects or basic research, and they shall be awarded at the discretion of the Secretary
of Defense following a review of medical research and development
gaps, as well as unfinanced medical requirements of the services.
Further, the Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 180 days after
the enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees,
which lists the projects that receive funding. The report should include the funding amount awarded to each project, a thorough description of each project’s research, and the benefit the research
will provide to the Department of Defense.

191
Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Programs.—The Committee includes $120,000,000 for the peer-reviewed breast cancer research
program, $64,000,000 for the peer-reviewed prostate cancer research program, $10,000,000 for the peer-reviewed ovarian cancer
research program, and $25,000,000 for the peer-reviewed cancer research program that would research cancers not addressed in the
aforementioned programs currently executed by the Department of
Defense.
The funds provided in the peer-reviewed cancer research program are directed to be used to conduct research in the following
areas: kidney cancer, melanoma, mesothelioma, myeloproliferative
disorders, and neuroblastoma.
The funds provided under the peer-reviewed cancer research program shall be used only for the purposes listed above. The Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)
to provide a report not later than 180 days after the enactment of
this act to the congressional defense committees on the status of
the peer-reviewed cancer research program. For each research
area, the report should include the funding amount awarded, the
progress of the research, and the relevance of the research to
servicemembers.
Orthotics and Prosthetics Outcomes Research.—The Committee
understands that over the last 10 years of war, more than 1,500
servicemembers have suffered a major amputation. The vast majority of the acute care and initial rehabilitation of these
servicemembers has occurred within the Department’s Advanced
Rehabilitation Centers, which continue to provide rehabilitative
techniques and advanced prosthetic technologies that facilitate
maximum functional outcomes. While the Committee acknowledges
the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs
joint conference on the State of the Art in Orthotics and Prosthetics
in March 2010, the Committee recognizes that too little is known
about which orthotic and prosthetic supports, treatments, and technologies generate the best outcomes for which patients. The Committee believes that continued research on orthotics and prosthetics
outcomes can further improve care for servicemembers with limb
loss and limb impairment and support evidence-based practice by
allowing doctors to match servicemembers and veterans with the
orthotic or prosthetic that best works for them. Therefore, the Committee provides $10,000,000 in support of such comparative outcomes research and directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Health Affairs) to provide a report not later than 180 days after
the enactment of this act to the congressional defense committees
on the peer-reviewed projects that receive funding. The report
should include the funding amount awarded to each project and the
anticipated effect on patient care.
Healthy Base Initiative.—The Committee expects that the Department will employ a strong underpinning and binding paradigm
to ensure the Department is focused and efficient in its transition
of Healthy Base Initiative [HBI] bases from locations of multiple,
stove-piped, often redundant, and frequently uncoordinated baselevel health and community programs—and the eventual evolution
of the participating HBI bases to ‘‘Blue Zones.’’ The current and
most comprehensive framework for this new paradigm is Total

192
Force Fitness [TFF], which is already embedded in the Department’s doctrine.
Not later than 180 days from enactment of this act, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit a report to the congressional defense committees that includes a plan for the comprehensive coordination
and delivery of TFF onto the existing health and community programs of bases selected to participate in the HBI and similar DOD
programs, such as Marine Total Fitness; Comprehensive Soldier
Fitness; Sleep, Activity, and Nutrition [SAN] program; and family
resilience programs. This plan should address how the DOD will:
—conduct assessments of the scope of TFF domains in the DOD
in order to fully understand the expanse and redundancy of existing programs;
—evaluate the efficiency and outcomes of existing programs
against TFF metrics;
—conduct realignment of base-level resources to ensure strong
and non-redundant program coverage across each of the TFF
domains;
—coordinate activities across the remaining programs;
—educate servicemembers and their families as to proper program access and use; and
—conduct continual program and HBI evaluation against the selected TFF metrics. The Committee encourages the Department to seek the assistance of expert civilian and military
groups with experience in TFF and whole systems/whole person integration.
The Committee strongly believes that such an approach to baselevel asset and program management will ensure a strong and vibrant military community and transition bases into ‘‘Blue Zones’’ of
health, wellbeing, and resilience. Accordingly, the Committee provides $3,000,000 in Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide to
expand the Healthy Base Initiative.
Reconstructive Transplantation.—The Committee recognizes that
the science and execution of complex transplants is at a critical
juncture. Transplantation is an important alternative to prosthetics
that restores function and sensation to the recipient, and the Department has focused its research funding in this area on the prevention of immune rejection, clinical monitoring of transplant recipients, and standardization of processes and protocols. The Committee supports continued research into reconstructive transplantation in order to achieve life-changing results for servicemembers
and civilians alike.
Prescription Effectiveness of Psychotropic Medications.—The
Committee supports the Department’s efforts to treat patients diagnosed with behavioral health disorders and believes that recent efforts to use database-supported methods in order to increase the
accuracy and effectiveness of prescription practices for mental
health medications may not only achieve cost savings but also improve patient care. The Committee encourages the Department to
continue these efforts and looks forward to receiving an update
once interim results of this research are realized at the end of this
calendar year.
Bioscavenger Medical Countermeasures.—The Committee is concerned about the recent use of chemical agents in the Middle East

193
and supports the Department’s efforts to develop multiple nerve
agent bioscavengers to protect the warfighter against chemical
nerve agent exposure. The Committee looks forward to further advancement of this technology and encourages the Department to
consider scalability, productivity, and cost effectiveness in its development.
Global Health Engagements.—The Department’s global health
engagements support combatant commanders’ efforts to build the
capacity of partner nations, manage and respond to local health
challenges, and promote regional stability by increasing access to
basic health services. The Committee encourages the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), in collaboration with the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, to establish a learning tool to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of global health
engagements in meeting national security goals.
Trauma Clinical Research Repository.—The Committee recognizes that trauma-related deaths impact our military services as
well as the general civilian population, and the life-saving impact
of trauma clinical research can be seen on the battlefield and in civilian trauma response. A trauma clinical research repository, accessible to both public and private researchers, would provide an
opportunity to make widely available the data resulting from current and future research that could lead to significant advances in
treatment and improved outcomes in both the military and civilian
populations. Therefore, the Committee encourages the Department
of Defense to work with other Federal agencies and the private sector to establish a trauma clinical research repository to share and
maximize critical trauma research data.
Pain Management.—The Committee recognizes that chronic pain
disorders are increasingly prevalent among servicemembers and
commends the Department for its initial steps to leverage investments by the National Institutes of Health in the development of
the Pain Assessment Screening Tool and Outcomes Registry [PASTOR] for its use throughout the Military Health System [MHS].
The Committee encourages the Department to implement PASTOR
throughout the MHS in an effort to inform the development of evidence-based approaches to chronic pain management.
The Committee also supports the Department’s research and implementation efforts on holistic, multidisciplinary, and multimodal
approaches in seeking alternatives to opioid analgesics for pain
management. The Army’s 2010 Pain Management Task Force Report found that acupuncture in particular has proven valuable in
reducing an overreliance on use of medications to treat pain. Recent research has shown the effectiveness and tremendous promise
of acupuncture as a drugless, stigma-less approach in treating
pain, stress, anxiety, insomnia, and drug addiction. Despite the evidence of acupuncture’s value within the military, it is not universally available, and there are no standards to guide the clinical integration of acupuncture into models of care for wounded and ill
servicemembers. The Committee encourages the Department to research the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture and develop a
comprehensive approach to pain management through the appropriate integration of acupuncture and other integrative medicine
approaches.

194
Warfighter Respiratory Health.—The Committee understands
that respiratory diseases affect more than 100,000 servicemembers
each year and is concerned about respiratory ailments among deployed and returning servicemembers. Deployed military personnel
have nearly double the rate of respiratory symptoms than non-deployed personnel. Beyond the decreased quality of life for affected
servicemembers, respiratory diseases result in almost 27,000 lost
workdays per year according to the Department. The Committee
encourages the Department to provide adequate resources for research on respiratory health.
Epilepsy Research.—The Committee is concerned about the large
number of servicemembers who have sustained traumatic brain injuries [TBI] and are at high risk for developing post-traumatic epilepsy. As current TBI longitudinal studies have not included epilepsy, the Committee encourages the Department to place greater
priority on longitudinal epidemiological research, including epilepsy
surveillance, to better understand the magnitude of the problem
and improve patient care and outcomes. In addition, the Committee
urges the Department to expand research into the mechanisms by
which brain injury produces epilepsy and prevention of epilepsy in
those known to be at high risk.
Melanoma Research.—The Committee understands that melanoma diagnoses are increasing among Active Duty servicemembers
and that melanoma is the fifth most common cancer among veterans. Recent research suggests that exposure to high levels of
solar radiation in young adulthood is associated with a higher risk
of melanoma mortality. Given the extreme and harsh conditions
servicemembers face in theater and the rise of this aggressive and
frequently deadly form of cancer, the Committee encourages the
Department to continue its investments in melanoma research.
DNA Vaccine Technology for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis.—The
Committee is aware the Army is seeking industry partners to develop a capability for rapid production of polyclonal antibody-based
medical countermeasures to prevent and treat emerging infectious
diseases. The use of DNA vaccines to stimulate the production of
polyclonal antibodies in anseriformes has shown promise, and the
Committee encourages the Army to continue its research in this
area.
Medical Defense Against Infectious Disease.—The Committee recognizes the importance of medical countermeasures to naturally occurring infectious diseases that pose a significant threat to the
operational effectiveness of forces deployed outside the United
States. Given the Department’s recent strategic realignment toward the Asia-Pacific region and the prevalence of infectious diseases, the Committee encourages the Department to address diseases of military importance by encouraging collaboration with colleges and universities that have strong research programs in the
areas of malaria, bacterial diarrhea, and viral diseases.
Convergence Science.—The U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [MRMC] is responsible for the research, development, and acquisition of medical materiel for the health, protection,
and enhanced performance of military personnel. An emerging element of MRMC’s efforts to provide the most advanced medical technology is convergence science, which is the merging of life, physical,

195
and engineering sciences to provide an integrated approach for
achieving advances in medical technology. Medical technology
areas characterized by the convergence science approach are
bioinformatics, synthetic biology, tissue engineering, biomaterials,
and computational biology. This approach is at the cutting edge of
technical advances led by top engineering universities and medical
institutions. The Committee encourages the Army to continue this
important work and advance this pioneering approach to military
medical technology.
CHEMICAL AGENTS

AND

MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE

2013 1

$1,300,068,000
1,057,123,000
1,057,123,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,057,123,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the budget estimate for this appropriation, the Committee recommendation, and the Committee
recommended adjustments to the budget estimate:

1
3
2

........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL, CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE ..................................

Qty.

CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ...............................................................
CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—PROCUREMENT .........................................................................................
CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION ................................

CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE

Item

[Dollars in thousands]

1,057,123

451,572
1,368
604,183

2014 budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
........................

Qty.

1,057,123

451,572
1,368
604,183

Committee
recommendation

........................

........................
........................
........................

Qty.

Budget
estimate

........................

........................
........................
........................

Change from

196

197
DRUG INTERDICTION

AND

COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE

2013 1

$1,157,733,000
938,545,000
1,068,545,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,068,545,000.
This is $130,000,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADJUSTMENTS

The following table details the adjustments recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

010
030

Item

Fiscal year 2014
request

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget request

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities ......................
Counter-Drug Program State Plans ...............................
Drug Demand Reduction Program ..........................................

815,965
........................
122,580

945,965
........................
122,580

∂130,000
∂130,000
........................

Total, Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense .........................................................

938,545

1,068,545

∂130,000

Counter-Drug Intelligence Support.—The Committee understands
that the exploitation of open source intelligence, particularly foreign media activity, has yielded substantial value to counter-drug
efforts. These efforts have created regional expertise in geographical areas where it is hard or dangerous to deploy U.S. assets
and have provided indications and warnings of criminal and extremist activity. The Committee encourages the Department to continue tracking the effect and influence of local media outlets on civilian populations at the national and subnational level to provide
detailed knowledge of behavioral changes by groups, governments,
and organizations.
National Guard Counter-Drug Schools.—The National Guard
Counter-Drug Schools program has the unique mission of providing
combatant commands, law enforcement agencies, community-based
organizations, and military personnel with training to support and
enhance their capabilities to detect, interdict, disrupt and curtail
drug trafficking. The Committee feels this training is of utmost importance to ensure public safety and national security and therefore urges the Department to reverse the funding decline that this
program has experienced in recent years.
JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... ...........................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
$98,800,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. ...........................
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent
Operational Needs Fund.

198
OFFICE
2013 1

OF THE INSPECTOR

GENERAL

$349,859,000
312,131,000
348,031,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $348,031,000.
This is $35,900,000 above the budget estimate. This increase is
consistent with S. 1197, the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014, as reported.

TITLE VII
RELATED AGENCIES
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY RETIREMENT
SYSTEM FUND

AND

DISABILITY

$514,000,000
514,000,000
514,000,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $514,000,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$533,716,000
568,271,000
568,671,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $568,671,000.
This is $400,000 above the budget estimate.

(199)

TITLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following lists general provisions proposed by the Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several proposals
which have been incorporated in previous appropriations acts, provisions requested for inclusion by the Defense Department, and
new provisions. The Committee recommendations are as follows:
SEC. 8001. Publicity/propaganda limitation.—Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8002. Compensation/employment of foreign nationals.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8003. Obligation rate of appropriations.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8004. Obligations in last 2 months of fiscal year.—Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8005. Transfers.—Retains and modifies a provision carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8006. Project Level Adjustments.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8007. Establishment of Reprogramming Baseline.—Retains
and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8008.Working Capital Fund Cash Disbursements.—Retains
a provision carried in previous year.
SEC. 8009. Special Access Programs Notification.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8010. Multiyear procurement authority.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8011. Humanitarian and Civic Assistance.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8012. Civilian Personnel Ceilings.—Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8013. Lobbying.—Retains a provision carried in previous
years.
SEC. 8014. Educational benefits and bonuses.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8015. Mentor-Protege Program.—Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8016. Anchor chains.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8017. Demilitarization of surplus firearms.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8018. Relocations into the National Capital Region.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8019. Indian Financing Act Incentives.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
(200)

201
SEC. 8020. Defense Media Activity.—Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8021. Burdensharing.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8022. Civil Air Patrol.—Retains and modifies a provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8023. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8024. Carbon, Alloy, or Armor Steel Plate.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8025. Congressional Defense Committees Definition.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8026. Depot Maintenance Competition.—Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8027. Reciprocal Trade Agreements.—Retains and modifies
a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8028. Overseas Military Facility Investment.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8029. Walking Shield.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8030. Investment Item Unit Cost.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8031. Defense Working Capital Fund/Investment Item.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8032. CIA Availability of Funds.—Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8033. GDIP Information System.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8034. Indian Tribes Environmental Impact.—Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8035. Compliance With the Buy America Act.—Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8036. Competition for Consultants and Studies Programs.—
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8037. Field operating agencies.—Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8038. Combat and Camouflage Utility Uniforms.—Includes
a new provision that restricts the design and fielding of new combat and camouflage utility uniforms.
SEC. 8039. Organizational Analysis/Contraction Out.—Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8040. Rescissions.—The Committee recommends a general
provision rescinding funds from the prior years as displayed below:
Amount

2012 Appropriations
Weapons Procurement, Navy:
Cruiser Modernization Weapons ..................................................................................................................
Other Procurement, Navy:
CG Modernization ........................................................................................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
C–27J Joint Cargo Aircraft ..........................................................................................................................
F–22 ............................................................................................................................................................
C–130 AMP .................................................................................................................................................
C–130J Mods—Block 7 upgrades ..............................................................................................................
MQ–9 Mods .................................................................................................................................................

$33,300,000
266,486,000
442,000,000
30,000,000
71,535,000
6,200,000
30,000,000

202
Amount

2013 Appropriations
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account:
CTR ..............................................................................................................................................................
Other Procurement, Army:
Biometrics Enterprise ..................................................................................................................................
Force Provider ..............................................................................................................................................
CREW ...........................................................................................................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
F/A–18E/F Advance Procurement ................................................................................................................
Other Procurement, Navy:
Airborne Mine Countermeasures (OASIS termination) ................................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
C–130J [AP] ................................................................................................................................................
C–27J Joint Cargo Aircraft ..........................................................................................................................
Spares—C–27J Joint Cargo Aircraft ..........................................................................................................
RQ–4: Production close-out ........................................................................................................................
C–130J Mods: Block 7 upgrades ................................................................................................................
KC–135 Mods ..............................................................................................................................................
Other Procurement, Air Force:
Night Vision Goggles ...................................................................................................................................
Procurement, Defense-wide:
DISA—Global Combat Support System ......................................................................................................
CBDP—Decontamination ............................................................................................................................
CBDP—Collective Protection ......................................................................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army:
IEWS: MFEW .................................................................................................................................................
Aircraft Mods: UH–60L Digital Cockpit ......................................................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy:
RETRACT ELM ..............................................................................................................................................
Joint Tactical Radio System ........................................................................................................................
Airborne Mine Countermeasures .................................................................................................................
Line 114: Ship Contract Design .................................................................................................................
Strategic Sub and Weapon System ............................................................................................................
Global Command and Control System ........................................................................................................
RQ–11 UAV ..................................................................................................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force:
Joint Precision Approach and Landing Systems .........................................................................................
Defense Health Program:
Integrated Electronic Health Record—RDT&E ............................................................................................
Integrated Electronic Health Record—Procurement ...................................................................................

75,000,000
40,000,000
5,000,000
15,426,000
30,256,000
4,446,000
20,000,000
69,524,000
50,000,000
63,400,000
19,166,000
17,000,000
6,000,000
2,703,000
464,000
24,199,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
21,000,000
30,000,000
5,000,000
10,000,000
11,000,000
357,000
400,000
12,104,000
61,299,000
104,600,000

SEC. 8041. Civilian Technicians Reductions.—Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8042. Prohibition on Assistance to North Korea.—Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8043. Reimbursement for Reserve Component Intelligence
Personnel.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8044. Civilian Medical Personnel Reductions.—Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8045. Counter-Drug Activities Transfer.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8046. Ball and Roller Bearings.—Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8047. Buy American Computers.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8048. Transfer to Other Agencies.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8049. Restrictions on Transfer of Equipment and Supplies.—
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8050. Contractor Bonuses Due to Business Restructuring.—
Retains a provision carried in previous years.

203
SEC. 8051. Reserve Peacetime Support to Active Duty and Civilian
Activities.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8052. Unexpended Balances.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
SEC. 8053. National Guard Distance Learning.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8054. Heating Plants in Europe.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8055. End-Item Procurement.—Retains a provisions carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8056. Buy American Waivers.—Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8057. Training of Security Forces of a Foreign Country.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8058. Repair and Maintenance of Military Family Housing.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8059. JCTD Project.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8060. Secretary of Defense Reporting Requirement.—Retains
a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8061. Support to Other Government Agencies.—Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8062. Missile Defense Authorization.—Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8063. Armor Piercing Ammo.—Retains a provision carried
in previous years.
SEC. 8064. Leasing Authority for National Guard Bureau.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8065. Alcoholic Beverages.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
SEC. 8066. O&M, Army transfer.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8067. Disbursements.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8068. Global Security Contingency Fund Authority.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8069. General and Flag Officer Reduction.—Includes a new
provision reducing funding for General and Flag Officers
SEC. 8070. Israeli Cooperative Programs.—Retains and modifies
a provision carried in previous years.
SEC.8071. Assignment of Forces.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8072. Prior Year Shipbuilding.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8073. Intelligence Authorization.—Retains and modifies a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8074. New Start Authority.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
SEC. 8075. Contingency Operations Budget Justification.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8076. Nuclear Armed Interceptors.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8077. Various Grant.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.

204
SEC. 8078. 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron.—Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8079. Integration of Foreign Intelligence.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8080. Notification of Reserve Mobilization.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8081. SCN Transfer Authority.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8082. SCN Judgment Fund.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
SEC. 8083. Army Tactical UAVs.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
SEC. 8084. Asia Pacific Regional Initiative.—Retains a provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8085. DNI R&D Waiver.—Retains a and modifies provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8086. Shipbuilding Obligations.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8087. Information Sharing.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years
SEC. 8088. Intelligence Baseline for Reprogramming.—Retains a
provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8089. NIP Reprogramming.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
SEC. 8090. Future Years Intelligence Budget.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8091. Congressional Intelligence Committee Definition.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8092. Cost of War Report.—Retains a provision carried in
previous years.
SEC. 8093. Fisher House Authorization.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8094. Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund.—
Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8095. Public Disclosure of Agency Reports.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8096. Contractor Compliance with the Civil Rights Act of
1964.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8097. 18th Aggressor Squadron.—Includes a new provision
that restricts transitioning of the Squadron from Eielson Air Force
Base.
SEC. 8098. DOD–VA Medical Facility Demonstration.—Retains
and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8099. Travel and Conference Activities.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8100. Senior Mentors.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8101. Armored Vehicles.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8102. Ship Modernization, Operations and Sustainment
Fund.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8103. For Profit Advertising.—Inserts a new provision that
prohibits voluntary military education funding from being used for
advertising and marketing.

205
SEC. 8104. For Profit Rule.—Inserts a new provision designating
voluntary military education funding as Federal funding.
SEC. 8105. Superintendent Commission.—Inserts a new provision
that establishes a commission for Superintendents of Service Academies
SEC. 8106. Economic Assumptions.—Inserts a new provision on
foreign currency fluctuations.
SEC. 8107. Transfer of Detainees to or within the United States.—
Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8108. Transfer of Detainees to a Foreign Country or Entity.—Retains and modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8109. Detainee Facilities.—Retains and modifies a provision
carried in previous years.
SEC. 8110. Corporations with Tax Liabilities.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8111. Corporations Convicted of Felonies.—Retains a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8112. Procurement of RQ–4B Global Hawk.—Retains and
modifies a provision carried in previous years.
SEC. 8113. Rosoboronexport.—Retains and modifies a provision
carried in previous.
SEC. 8114. President of Afghanistan.—Inserts a new provision
that prohibits the United States Government from obligating or expending money for the personal benefit of the President of Afghanistan.
SEC. 8115. Sexual Assault Special Victims Program.—Inserts a
new provision that establishes a Sexual Assault Special Victims
Program.
SEC. 8116. Afghanistan Tax.—Inserts a new provision that requires the Department of Defense to reduce funds for the Government of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan if taxes, duties, penalties,
and fees are imposed on the United States.
SEC. 8117. Ex Gratia Payments.—Inserts a new provision regarding ex gratia payments by the United States.
SEC. 8118. Minuteman III Environmental Impact Analysis.—Inserts a new provision that prohibits the use of funds for an environmental impact analysis on Minuteman III silos.
SEC. 8119. Syrian Intervention.—Inserts a new provision that
prohibits the use of funds in contravention of the War Powers Resolution with respect to Syria.

TITLE IX
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
DEPARTMENT

DEFENSE—MILITARY

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $77,623,143,000
for operations related to overseas contingency operations. In fiscal
year 2013 Congress appropriated $86,954,838,000 for activities
funded in this title.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table summarizes the Committee recommendation:
[In thousands of dollars]
Fiscal year 2013
enacted

Fiscal year 2014
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Military Personnel ................................................................................
Operation and Maintenance ................................................................
Procurement .........................................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation .....................................
Revolving and Management Funds .....................................................
Other Department of Defense Programs .............................................
General Provisions (net) ......................................................................

14,116,821
62,131,012
8,979,438
247,716
243,600
3,096,303
¥1,860,052

9,689,307
62,829,052
5,351,979
116,634
264,910
2,306,272
..........................

9,405,307
60,586,019
5,171,602
88,708
264,910
2,157,497
¥50,900

Total, Overseas Contingency Operations ................................

86,954,838

80,558,154

77,623,143

OVERVIEW
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends $77,623,143,000 of additional appropriations for overseas contingency operations in fiscal year 2014.
This funding will ensure that resources, equipment, and supplies
are available for our servicemembers without interruption, and will
enable the Department to avoid absorbing operational costs from
within baseline programs that are critical to future readiness and
home-station activities.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Committee directs that the Department of Defense continue
to report incremental contingency operations costs for Operation
Enduring Freedom on a monthly basis in the Cost of War Execution report as required by Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, chapter 23, volume 12. The Committee further directs the Department to continue providing the Cost of War
reports to the congressional defense committees that include the
following information by appropriation: funding appropriated, funding allocated, monthly obligations, monthly disbursements, cumulative fiscal year obligations, and cumulative fiscal year disbursements.
(206)

207
The Committee expects that in order to meet unanticipated requirements, the Department of Defense may need to transfer funds
within these appropriations accounts for purposes other than those
specified in this report. The Committee directs the Department of
Defense to follow normal prior approval reprogramming procedures
should it be necessary to transfer funding between different appropriations accounts in this title.
MILITARY PERSONNEL
The Committee recommends a total of $9,405,307,000 for pay, allowances, and other personnel costs for Active, Reserve, and Guard
troops activated for duty in Afghanistan and other contingency operations. This recommendation includes funding for subsistence,
permanent change of station travel, and special pays including imminent danger pay, family separation allowance, and hardship
duty pay.
MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY
2013 1

$9,790,082,000
6,747,515,000
6,463,515,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,463,515,000.
This is $284,000,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Basic Pay ....................................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess to requirement ....
Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................
Incentive Pays .............................................................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................
Separation Pay ............................................................................
Social Security Tax .....................................................................

864,052
........................
238,058
271,092
34,598
5,126
38,486
19,132
88,867
65,940

725,052
........................
238,058
271,092
34,598
5,126
38,486
19,132
88,867
65,940

¥139,000
¥139,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

1,625,351

1,486,351

¥139,000

1,925,501
........................
543,288
763,796
2,427
176,568
110,227
180,287
147,361

1,848,501
........................
543,288
763,796
2,427
176,568
110,227
180,287
147,361

¥77,000
¥77,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Item

BA 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5
10
25
30
35
40
45
50
55

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60
65
80
85
90
95
100
105

Basic Pay ....................................................................................
Improving funds management: Excess to requirement ....
Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Incentive Pays .............................................................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................
Separation Pay ............................................................................
Social Security Tax .....................................................................

208
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

TOTAL .............................................................................

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

3,849,455

3,772,455

¥77,000

BA 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115
120

Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................
Subsistence-In-Kind ....................................................................
Improving funds management: Army identified excess to
requirement ...................................................................

251,345
500,504

251,345
445,504

........................
¥55,000

........................

¥55,000

TOTAL .............................................................................

751,849

696,849

¥55,000

Accession Travel .........................................................................
Training Travel ............................................................................
Operational Travel ......................................................................
Rotational Travel ........................................................................
Separation Travel ........................................................................
Travel of Organized Units ...........................................................

11,091
8,926
105,220
54,677
14,169
622

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

194,705

........................

Interest On Uniformed Services Savings ....................................
Death Gratuities .........................................................................
Unemployment Benefits ..............................................................
Improving Funds Management: Excess to requirement ....
Reserve Income Replacement Program ......................................
SGLI Extra Hazard Payments ......................................................
Traumatic Injury Protection Coverage [T–SGLI] .........................

4,745
7,449
204,833
........................
40
73,261
35,827

4,745
7,449
191,833
........................
40
73,261
35,827

........................
........................
¥13,000
¥13,000
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

326,155

313,155

¥13,000

TOTAL—MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY ..........................

6,747,515

6,463,515

¥284,000

BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL
125
130
135
140
145
150

BA 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
175
180
185
212
216
219

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY
2013 1

$774,225,000
558,344,000
558,344,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $558,344,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

99,067
24,271
31,959
3,427
749
4,858
7,458

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

BA 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5
10
25
30
35
40
45

Basic Pay ....................................................................................
Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................
Incentive Pays .............................................................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................

99,067
24,271
31,959
3,427
749
4,858
7,458

209
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Social Security Tax .....................................................................

7,579

........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

179,368

........................

Basic Pay ....................................................................................
Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Incentive Pays .............................................................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................
Separation Pay ............................................................................
Social Security Tax .....................................................................

108,938
26,690
51,780
296
11,931
16,447
179
8,334

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

224,595

........................

Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................
Subsistence-In-Kind ....................................................................

12,359
22,956

........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

35,315

........................

Accession Travel .........................................................................
Operational Travel ......................................................................
Rotational Travel ........................................................................
Separation Travel ........................................................................

3,071
1,353
2,559
4,472

........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

11,455

........................

Death Gratuities .........................................................................
Unemployment Benefits ..............................................................
SGLI Extra Hazard Payments ......................................................

1,200
62,168
44,243

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

107,611

........................

TOTAL—MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY ...........................

558,344

........................

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60
65
80
85
90
95
100
105

BA 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115
120

BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL
125
135
140
145

BA 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
180
185
216

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$1,425,156,000
1,019,322,000
1,019,322,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,019,322,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

143,065

........................

BA 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5

Basic Pay ....................................................................................

143,065

210
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

10
25
30
40
45
50
55

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................
Separation Pay ............................................................................
Social Security Tax .....................................................................

41,321
48,408
6,073
4,120
4,155
43,118
10,937

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

301,197

........................

Basic Pay ....................................................................................
Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................
Separation Pay ............................................................................
Social Security Tax .....................................................................

267,486
81,344
89,578
25,141
16,905
78,956
20,463

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

579,873

........................

Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................

45,965

........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

45,965

........................

Rotational Travel ........................................................................
Separation Travel ........................................................................

19,481
4,371

........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

23,852

........................

Interest on Uniformed Services Savings ....................................
Death Gratuities .........................................................................
Unemployment Benefits ..............................................................
SGLI Extra Hazard Payments ......................................................

930
7,000
37,733
22,772

........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

68,435

........................

TOTAL—MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS ..........

1,019,322

........................

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60
65
80
90
95
100
105

BA 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115

BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL
140
145

BA 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
175
180
185
216

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
2013 1

$1,286,783,000
867,087,000
867,087,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $867,087,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

211
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BA 1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS
5
10
25
30
40
45
55

Basic Pay ....................................................................................
Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................
Social Security Tax .....................................................................

131,007
32,097
39,926
4,696
7,394
8,449
10,022

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

233,591

........................

Basic Pay ....................................................................................
Retired Pay Accrual ....................................................................
Basic Allowance For Housing .....................................................
Special Pays ...............................................................................
Allowances ..................................................................................
Social Security Tax .....................................................................

229,591
56,250
95,564
29,262
25,480
17,564

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

453,711

........................

Basic Allowance For Subsistence ...............................................
Subsistence-In-Kind ....................................................................

24,177
72,502

........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

96,679

........................

Operational Travel ......................................................................

4,003

........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

4,003

........................

600
28,841
49,662

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

79,103

........................

TOTAL—MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ..................

867,087

........................

BA 2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
60
65
80
90
95
105

BA 4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
115
120

BA 5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL
135

BA 6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS
180
185
216

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY
2013 1

$156,893,000
40,952,000
40,952,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $40,952,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

212
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
10
80

Pay Group A Training (15 Days & Drills 24/48) ........................
Special Training ..........................................................................

10,494
30,458

........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

40,952

........................

TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY ............................

40,952

........................

RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$39,335,000
20,238,000
20,238,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $20,238,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
70
80
90

School Training ...........................................................................
Special Training ..........................................................................
Administration And Support .......................................................

1,753
18,100
385

........................
........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

20,238

........................

TOTAL—RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY ...........................

20,238

........................

$24,722,000
15,134,000
15,134,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $15,134,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

3,213
11,679

........................
........................

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
70
80

School Training ...........................................................................
Special Training ..........................................................................

3,213
11,679

213
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Administration And Support .......................................................

242

........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

15,134

........................

TOTAL—RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS ..........

15,134

........................

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$25,348,000
20,432,000
20,432,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $20,432,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
80

Special Training ..........................................................................

20,432

........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

20,432

........................

TOTAL—RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ..................

20,432

........................

$583,804,000
393,364,000
393,364,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $393,364,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

50,638
19,444

........................
........................

BA1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
10
70

Pay Group A Training (15 Days & Drills 24/48) ........................
School Training ...........................................................................

50,638
19,444

214
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

80
90

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Special Training ..........................................................................
Administration And Support .......................................................

286,096
37,186

........................
........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

393,364

........................

TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY ...............

393,364

........................

$10,473,000
6,919,000
6,919,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,919,000. This
is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

BA 1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING
80

Special Training ..........................................................................

6,919

........................

TOTAL .............................................................................

6,919

........................

TOTAL—NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE ....

6,919

........................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The Committee recommends $60,586,019,000 for the operation
and maintenance accounts. These funds are available to fund overseas deployments and other activities by the services and Special
Operations Forces to include financing flying hours, ship steaming
days, ground operations, special airlift missions, increased ship and
aircraft maintenance, logistics support, fuel purchases, base support, civilian personnel, personnel support costs, overseas transportation, communications support, facility management, and other
operation and maintenance requirements.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, ARMY

2013 1

Appropriations,
........................................................................... $28,452,018,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ........................................................................... 29,279,633,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. 28,663,919,000
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $28,663,919,000.
This is $615,714,000 below the budget estimate.

215
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

111

112

113

114

115

116

121

122
123
131

135

136
137
411
421
424
432
434

435
437

Item

Maneuver Units ...........................................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Modular Support Brigades ..........................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Echelons Above Brigade .............................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Theater Level Assets ...................................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Land Forces Operations Support ................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Aviation Assets ...........................................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Force Readiness Operations Support .........................................
Army-Requested Transfer to Other Procurement, Army
and Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Army: Rapid Equipping Force .......................................
Land Forces Systems Readiness ................................................
Transfer From JIEDDO: RQ–7 Sustainment .......................
Land Forces Depot Maintenance ................................................
Base Operations Support ............................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Additional Activities ....................................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: Civilian Expeditionary
Workforce .......................................................................
Improving Funds Management: Align Afghanistan Reintegration Program with Funding Execution ...............
Commander’s Emergency Response Program ............................
Improving Funds Management: Prior Year Carryover .......
Reset ...........................................................................................
Security Programs .......................................................................
Servicewide Transportation .........................................................
Ammunition Management ...........................................................
Servicewide Communications .....................................................
Other Personnel Support .............................................................
Budget Documentation Disparity: Overstatement of Fiscal Year 2013 Baseline ................................................
Other Service Support .................................................................
Real Estate Management ...........................................................
Authorization Adjustment: BuckEye Terrain Data System ................................................................................
Total, Operation and Maintenance, Army .................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

217,571

........................

¥217,571

........................
8,266

........................
........................

¥217,571
¥8,266

........................
56,626

........................
........................

¥8,266
¥56,626

........................
4,209,942

........................
4,197,338

¥56,626
¥12,604

........................
950,567

........................
819,000

¥12,604
¥131,567

........................
474,288

........................
445,629

¥131,567
¥28,659

........................
1,349,152

........................
1,317,652

¥28,659
¥31,500

........................
655,000
........................
301,563
706,214

........................
675,000
........................
301,563
580,993

¥31,500
∂20,000
∂20,000
........................
¥125,221

........................
11,519,498

........................
11,489,498

¥125,221
¥30,000

........................

¥15,000

........................
60,000
........................
2,240,358
1,402,994
4,601,356
17,418
110,000
94,820

........................
50,000
........................
2,240,358
1,402,994
4,601,356
17,418
110,000
54,820

¥15,000
¥10,000
¥10,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥40,000

........................
54,000
250,000

........................
54,000
306,300

¥40,000
........................
∂56,300

........................

∂56,300

29,279,633

28,663,919

¥615,714

Commanders Emergency Response Program.—The Committee
recommends $50,000,000 for the Commanders Emergency Response
Program [CERP] in Afghanistan in fiscal year 2014. The Committee directs the Army to submit monthly commitment, obligation,
and expenditure data for CERP to the congressional defense committees no later than 30 days after each month.

216
CERP Projects.—The Committee includes language in the Commander’s Emergency Response Program [CERP] general provision
that requires all projects executed under this authority shall be
small scale, and shall not exceed $20,000,000 in cost (including any
ancillary or related elements in connection with such project).
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, NAVY

$5,839,934,000
6,067,993,000
5,329,960,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,329,960,000.
This is $738,033,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

1A1A
1A3A
1A4A
1A4N
1A5A
1A6A
1A9A
1B1B

Mission and Other Flight Operations .........................................
Aviation Technical Data and Engineering Services ...................
Air Operations and Safety Support ............................................
Air Systems Support ...................................................................
Aircraft Depot Maintenance ........................................................
Aviation Depot Operations Support ............................................
Aviation Logistics .......................................................................
Mission and Other Ship Operations ...........................................
Transfer to Title II: Ship Operations .................................
Ship Operations Support and Training ......................................
Ship Depot Maintenance ............................................................
Combat Communications ...........................................................
Warfare Tactics ...........................................................................
Operational Meteorology and Oceanography ..............................
Combat Support Forces ..............................................................
Equipment Maintenance .............................................................
In-Service Weapons Systems Support ........................................
Weapons Maintenance ................................................................
Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization ............
Base Operating Support .............................................................
Expeditionary Health Service Systems ........................................
Coast Guard Support ..................................................................
Transfer to Department of Homeland Security .................
Specialized Skill Training ...........................................................
Training Support .........................................................................
Administration ............................................................................
External Relations .......................................................................
Military Manpower and Personnel Management ........................
Other Personnel Support .............................................................
Servicewide Communications .....................................................
Servicewide Transportation .........................................................
Acquisition and Program Management ......................................
Naval Investigative Service ........................................................
Classified Programs ...................................................................

845,169
600
17,489
78,491
162,420
2,700
50,130
949,539
........................
20,226
1,679,660
37,760
25,351
20,045
1,212,296
10,203
127,972
221,427
13,386
110,940
18,460
227,033
........................
50,269
5,400
2,418
516
5,107
1,411
2,545
153,427
8,570
1,425
5,608

845,169
600
17,489
78,491
162,420
2,700
50,130
438,539
........................
20,226
1,679,660
37,760
25,351
20,045
1,212,296
10,203
127,972
221,427
13,386
110,940
18,460
........................
........................
50,269
5,400
2,418
516
5,107
1,411
2,545
153,427
8,570
1,425
5,608

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥511,000
¥511,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥227,033
¥227,033
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Operation and Maintenance, Navy .....................

6,067,993

5,329,960

¥738,033

1B2B
1B4B
1C1C
1C4C
1C5C
1C6C
1C7C
1D3D
1D4D
BSM1
BSS1
2C1H
2C3H
3B1K
3B4K
4A1M
4A2M
4A4M
4A5M
4A6M
4B1N
4B3N
4C1P
9999

217
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS

2013 1

$4,116,340,000
2,669,815,000
2,603,329,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,603,329,000.
This is $66,486,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

1A1A
1A2A
1A3A
BSS1
3B4D
4A3G
4A4G
999

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Operational Forces ......................................................................
Transfer to Title II: Operating Costs to Support End
Strength .........................................................................
Field Logistics .............................................................................
Depot Maintenance .....................................................................
Base Operating Support .............................................................
Training Support .........................................................................
Servicewide Transportation .........................................................
Administration ............................................................................
Classified Programs ...................................................................

992,190

925,704

¥66,486

........................
559,574
570,000
69,726
108,270
365,555
3,675
825

¥66,486
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps ........

2,669,815

2,603,329

¥66,486

OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE

$9,249,736,000
10,005,224,000
9,964,224,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,964,224,000.
This is $41,000,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

011A
011C
011D
011M
011R
011Z
012A
012C

013A
013C
015A

Item

Primary Combat Forces ..............................................................
Combat Enhancement Forces .....................................................
Improving Funds Management: Unjustified Growth in
Contracts .......................................................................
Air Operations Training ..............................................................
Depot Maintenance .....................................................................
Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization ............
Base Operating Support .............................................................
Global C3I and Early Warning ....................................................
Other Combat Ops Spt Programs ...............................................
Improving Funds Management: Unjustified Growth in
Contracts .......................................................................
Launch Facilities ........................................................................
Space Control Systems ...............................................................
Combatant Commanders Direct Mission Support ......................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

1,712,393
836,104

1,712,393
802,104

........................
¥34,000

........................
14,118
1,373,480
122,712
1,520,333
31,582
147,524

........................
14,118
1,373,480
122,712
1,520,333
31,582
140,524

¥34,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥7,000

........................
857
8,353
50,495

¥7,000
........................
........................
........................

218
[In thousands of dollars]
2014 budget
estimate

Line

Item

021A
021D
021M
021R
021Z
031A
031B
031Z
032A
032B
032C
032D
033C
041A
041B
041Z
042A
042B
042G
043A
044A

Airlift Operations ........................................................................
Mobilization Preparedness ..........................................................
Depot Maintenance .....................................................................
Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization ............
Base Support ..............................................................................
Officer Acquisition ......................................................................
Recruit Training ..........................................................................
Base Support ..............................................................................
Specialized Skill Training ...........................................................
Flight Training ............................................................................
Professional Development Education .........................................
Training Support .........................................................................
Off-Duty and Voluntary Education .............................................
Logistics Operations ...................................................................
Technical Support Activities .......................................................
Base Support ..............................................................................
Administration ............................................................................
Servicewide Communications .....................................................
Other Servicewide Activities .......................................................
Security Programs .......................................................................
International Support ..................................................................
Total, Operation and Maintenance, Air Force ...............

OPERATION

AND

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

3,091,133
47,897
387,179
7,043
68,382
100
478
19,256
12,845
731
607
720
152
86,273
2,511
19,887
3,493
152,086
269,825
16,558
117

10,005,224

9,964,224

¥41,000

MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE

$7,714,079,000
6,435,078,000
6,435,078,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,435,078,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Special Operations Command ....................................................
Defense Contract Audit Agency ..................................................
Defense Contract Management Agency ......................................
Defense Human Resource Activity ..............................................
Beyond Yellow Ribbon Programs .......................................
Defense Information Systems Agency ........................................
Defense Legal Services Agency ..................................................
Defense Media Activity ...............................................................
Department of Defense Education Activity ................................
Defense Security Cooperation Agency ........................................
Office of the Secretary of Defense .............................................
Washington Headquarters Services ............................................
Classified Programs ...................................................................
Classified Adjustment .......................................................

2,222,868
27,781
45,746
........................
........................
76,348
99,538
9,620
100,100
1,950,000
38,227
2,784
1,862,066
........................

2,222,868
27,781
45,746
15,000
........................
76,348
99,538
9,620
100,100
1,950,000
38,227
2,784
1,847,066
........................

........................
........................
........................
∂15,000
∂15,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥15,000
¥15,000

Total, Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide .......

6,435,078

........................

Beyond Yellow Ribbon Programs.—The Committee provides an
additional $15,000,000 for the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Pro-

219
gram Office under the Defense Human Resource Activity and directs using the funds for National Guard and Reserve outreach and
reintegration programs, National Guard and Reserve employment
enhancement programs and peer-to-peer hotline services for mental
health and suicide prevention initiatives. For the peer-to-peer hotline services, the Committee encourages continued coordination between the Defense Human Resource Activity, the National Guard
Bureau and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs.
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE

2013 1

$157,887,000
42,935,000
42,935,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $42,935,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

113
115
121
131

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .......................................................
LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................
FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................

6,995
2,332
608
33,000

........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve .......

42,935

........................

OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE

2013 1

$55,924,000
55,700,000
55,700,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $55,700,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

1A1A
1A3A
1A5A
1B1B
1B4B
1C6C

Mission and Other Flight Operations .........................................
Intermediate Maintenance ..........................................................
Aircraft Depot Maintenance ........................................................
Mission and Other Ship Operations ...........................................
Ship Depot Maintenance ............................................................
Combat Support Forces ..............................................................
Total, Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve ........

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

17,196
200
6,000
12,304
6,790
13,210

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

55,700

........................

220
OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE

2013 1

$25,477,000
12,534,000
12,534,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $12,534,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

1A1A
BSS1

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Operating Forces .........................................................................
Base Operating Support .............................................................

11,124
1,410

........................
........................

Total, Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve .........................................................................

12,534

........................

OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE

2013 1

$60,618,000
32,849,000
32,849,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $32,849,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

011M
011Z

Depot Maintenance .....................................................................
Base Support ..............................................................................
Total, Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve .........................................................................

OPERATION

AND

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

26,599
6,250

........................
........................

32,849

........................

MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

2013 1

$392,448,000
199,371,000
199,371,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $199,371,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:

221
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

111
112
113
114
116
121
131
133
432

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Maneuver Units ...........................................................................
Modular Support Brigades ..........................................................
Echelons Above Brigade .............................................................
Theater Level Assets ...................................................................
Aviation Assets ...........................................................................
Force Readiness Operations Support .........................................
Base Operations Support ............................................................
Management and Operational Headquarters .............................
Servicewide Communication .......................................................

29,314
1,494
15,343
1,549
64,504
31,512
42,179
11,996
1,480

Total, Operation and Maintenance, Army National
Guard ........................................................................

199,371

........................

OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD

$34,500,000
22,200,000
22,200,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $22,200,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

011G

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Mission Support Operations .......................................................

22,000

........................

Total, Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard

22,000

........................

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$325,000,000
279,000,000
279,000,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $279,000,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Power ..........................................................................................

279,000

........................

Total, Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund ........................

279,000

........................

222
AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$5,124,167,000
7,726,720,000
6,944,920,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,944,920,000.
This is $781,800,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Infrastructure ..............................................................................
Equipment and Transportation ...................................................
Training and Operations .............................................................
Sustainment ................................................................................

278,650
2,180,382
626,550
2,735,603

278,650
1,398,582
626,550
2,735,603

........................
¥781,800
........................
........................

Subtotal, Ministry of Defense .......................................

5,821,185

5,039,385

........................

........................
54,696
626,119
1,214,995

........................
........................
........................
........................

Subtotal, Ministry of Interior .........................................

1,895,810

........................

........................
........................
2,500
7,225

........................
........................
........................
........................

Subtotal, Related Activities ..........................................

9,725

........................

Total, Afghanistan Security Forces Fund ......................

7,726,720

6,944,920

¥781,800

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.—The fiscal year 2014 request
for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund [ASFF] is
$7,726,727,000. This amount is a 50 percent increase from the
$5,124,167,000 funded in fiscal year 2013. Of this request,
$5,111,720,000 is for training, equipping and sustainment of the
Afghan national security forces [ANSF]. The request also includes
$2,615,000,000 for critical ‘‘enablers.’’ The critical enablers request
procures mobile strike vehicles, night vision technology, howitzers,
counter-improvised explosive device technology for the ANSF and
$1,126,900,000 for aircraft to support the Afghanistan Air Force
and the Afghan Special Mission Wing.
In June, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction [SIGAR] issued a report raising doubts on the Afghans’
ability to fly and maintain Mi-17 aircraft for the Afghan Special
Mission Wing. The report also raised concern over the Afghan military’s ability to maintain the aircraft and lack of Afghan pilots. In
responding to the SIGAR’s report, the Department stated that the
Special Mission Wing is only 1 year old and logistics and maintenance capabilities are being developed. The Committee is also concerned about conducting additional business with the Russian com-

223
pany, Rosoboronexport, the sole supplier of the Mi-17 helicopter.
Therefore, the Committee recommends a reduction to ASFF
enablers in the amount of $365,000,000 for the Mi-17 helicopter
and maintains a general provision prohibiting the Department
from entering into a contract with Rosoboronexport.
The Committee also recommends a reduction to ASFF enablers
in the amount of $416,800,000 for additional light air support
[LAS] aircraft. The budget request proposed funding for an additional 20 light support aircraft for Afghanistan. The original requirement that was outlined in 2009 identified a need for only 20
aircraft; after several setbacks, that contract was recently awarded
by the Air Force with fiscal year 2012 funds. However, the fiscal
year 2014 budget requests funding for an additional 20 aircraft
even though the Department of Defense has not identified a requirement for more LAS aircraft beyond the 20 that were awarded.
Recruiting and Retention of Women in Afghanistan National Security Forces.—Of the funds provided for the Afghanistan Security
Forces Fund, the Committee directs that $15,000,000 be directed
toward the recruitment and retention of women in the Afghan security forces. The funds should be focused on, but not limited to,
providing appropriate equipment for female security and police
forces, modification of facilities to allow for female participation
within the security and police forces and training to include literacy training for women recruits but also gender awareness training for male counterparts. The Committee directs the Department
of Defense to provide periodic updates to the congressional defense
committees on the efforts to increase women participation in the
Afghan armed forces.
Building Partnership Capacity [BPC] Program.—The BPC program is an important force multiplier that enables the United
States military to build the capacity of partner nations through the
training and equipping of their counterterrorism, counternarcotics,
and counterinsurgency units. The Committee concurs with the stated intent of the Air Force that the indefinite delivery/indefinite
quantity light air support [LAS] contract for Afghanistan will not
be used by any other nation for future BPC program purchases. According to Air Force testimony, the BPC program would provide a
LAS capability to as many as 27 nations. This would create a program of record in excess of $9,500,000,000 if all other nations purchase at a minimum the same number of planes as Afghanistan.
As a result, this program should be defined as a Major Defense Acquisition Program [MDAP] as defined under chapter 144 of title 10
of United States Code, with all provisions and reporting requirements of such chapter applying to the program, and should be reviewed within the regulatory review process established by the Secretary of Defense for MDAPs. The Committee directs the acquisition executive to ensure all acquisitions under this program be in
accordance with Department of Defense regulations and procedures.
PROCUREMENT
The Committee recommends $5,171,602,000 for the procurement
accounts. The overseas contingency operations funding supports
our forces engaged in Operation Enduring Freedom and other con-

224
tingency operations. The Committee provides funding to replace
combat losses and equipment left behind in theater, augment and
upgrade equipment for deploying units, sustain munitions and
other war consumables, and reset the units returning home to an
equipment-ready status. Funding adjustments have been made in
instances where the requirement was poorly defined, funding was
requested ahead of need or program execution has been delayed.
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
2013 1

$550,700,000
771,788,000
633,300,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $633,300,000.
This is $138,488,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

9
11

Saturn Arch [MIP] .......................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unjustified
growth ...........................................................................
MQ–1 UAV ...................................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Maintain same quantity .................................................................................
AH–64 Apache Block IIIB New Build ..........................................
Kiowa Warrior WRA .....................................................................
Maintaining program affordability: Maintain same quantity .................................................................................
CH–47 Helicopter ........................................................................
Total, Aircraft Procurement, Army .................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

48,000

........................

¥48,000

........................
31,988

........................
........................

¥48,000
¥31,988

........................
142,000
163,800

........................
142,000
105,300

¥31,988
........................
¥58,500

........................
386,000

¥58,500
........................

771,788

633,300

¥138,488

Saturn Arch.—The Army requests $48,000,000 to procure four
Saturn Arch aircraft. In March 2013, the Army received the mission for the Saturn Arch program as well as eight aircraft to complete the mission. The fiscal year 2014 budget requests an additional four aircraft for this mission. The Committee recommends no
funds for the additional aircraft since the Army has provided no
justification for these aircraft.
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$67,951,000
128,645,000
128,645,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $128,645,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

225
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

3
7
10

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Hellfire Sys Summary .................................................................
Guided MLRS Rocket [GMLRS] ...................................................
Army Tactical MSL System [ATACMS] ........................................

54,000
39,045
35,600

........................
........................
........................

Total, Missile Procurement, Army .................................

128,645

........................

PROCUREMENT

AMMUNITION, ARMY

2013 1

$338,493,000
180,900,000
190,900,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $190,900,000.
This is $10,000,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2
4
5
8
10
14

15
16
21
22
23
24
28

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Ctg, 5.56mm, All Types ..............................................................
CTG, Handgun, All Types ............................................................
CTG, .50 Cal, All Types ..............................................................
CTG, 30mm, All Types ................................................................
60MM Mortar, All Types ..............................................................
Artillery Cartridges, 75MM & 105MM, All Types ........................
Army unfunded request: 105MM Artillery High
Explosive ........................................................................
Artillery Projectile, 155MM, All Types .........................................
Proj 155mm Extended Range M982 ...........................................
Rocket, Hydra 70, All Types .......................................................
Demolition Munitions, All Types .................................................
Grenades, All Types ....................................................................
Signals, All Types .......................................................................
Cad/Pad All Types ......................................................................

4,400
1,500
5,000
60,000
5,000
10,000

4,400
1,500
5,000
60,000
5,000
20,000

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
∂10,000

........................
10,000
11,000
57,000
4,000
3,000
8,000
2,000

∂10,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Procurement of Ammunition, Army .....................

180,900

190,900

∂10,000

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$1,740,157,000
603,123,000
603,902,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $603,902,000.
This is $779,000 above the budget estimate.

226
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected [MRAP] Mods ......................
Installation Info Infrastructure Mod Program ............................
Improving funds management: excess to need ................
DCGS–A [MIP] .............................................................................
CI HUMINT Auto Reporting and Coll[CHARCS] ...........................
Lightweight Counter Mortar Radar .............................................
Family Of Persistent Surveillance Capabilities ..........................
Counterintelligence/Security Countermeasures ..........................
Improving funds management: unobligated prior year
funds .............................................................................
Artillery Accuracy Equip ..............................................................
Mod of In-Svc Equip [LLDR] .......................................................
Counterfire Radars .....................................................................
Force Provider .............................................................................
Field Feeding Equipment ............................................................
Rapid Equipping Soldier Support Equipment ............................
Army requested transfer from Operation and Maintenance, Army ..................................................................

321,040
25,000
........................
7,200
5,980
57,800
15,300
4,221

321,040
5,000
........................
7,200
5,980
57,800
15,300
........................

........................
¥20,000
¥20,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥4,221

........................
1,834
21,000
85,830
51,654
6,264
........................

........................
1,834
21,000
85,830
51,654
6,264
25,000

¥4,221
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

........................

∂25,000

603,123

603,902

∂779

Line

13
60
67
71
74
78
79

91
96
98
146
147
185

Total, Other Procurement, Army ...............................

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
2013 1

$215,698,000
240,696,000
211,176,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $211,176,000.
This is $29,520,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

26
31
33
39
49
54
55
59
65

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

H–1 Upgrades [UH-1Y/AH-1Z] ....................................................
Reducing duplication: combat loss added in Department
of Defense Fiscal Year 2013 Appropriations Act .........
MQ–8 UAV ...................................................................................
AV–8 Series ................................................................................
F–18 Series .................................................................................
EP–3 Series ................................................................................
Special Project Aircraft ...............................................................
Common ECM Equipment ...........................................................
Common Avionics Changes ........................................................
MAGTF EW for Aviation ...............................................................
Spares and Repair Parts ............................................................

29,520

........................

¥29,520

........................
13,100
57,652
35,500
2,700
3,375
49,183
4,190
20,700
24,776

¥29,520
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Aircraft Procurement, Navy .................................

240,696

211,176

¥29,520

227
WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
2013 1

$22,500,000
86,500,000
86,500,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $86,500,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

9
10
11

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Hellfire ........................................................................................
Laser Maverick ............................................................................
Stand off Precision Guided Munitions [SOPGM] ........................

27,000
58,000
1,500

........................
........................
........................

Total, Weapons Procurement, Navy ...............................

86,500

........................

PROCUREMENT

AMMUNITION, NAVY

AND

MARINE CORPS

$283,059,000
206,821,000
206,821,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $206,821,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

1
2
3
6
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Item

General Purpose Bombs .............................................................
Airborne Rockets, All Types ........................................................
Machine Gun Ammunition ..........................................................
Air Expendable Countermeasures ...............................................
60MM Mortar, All Types ..............................................................
Small Arms & Landing Party Ammo ..........................................
Pyrotechnic and Demolition ........................................................
Ammunition Less Than $5 Million .............................................
Small Arms Ammunition .............................................................
Linear Charges, All Types ...........................................................
40 Mm, All Types ........................................................................
60mm, All Types .........................................................................
81mm, All Types .........................................................................
120mm, All Types .......................................................................
Ctg 25mm, All Types ..................................................................
Grenades, All Types ....................................................................
Rockets, All Types .......................................................................
Artillery, All Types .......................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

11,424
30,332
8,282
31,884
409
11,976
2,447
7,692
13,461
3,310
6,244
3,368
9,162
10,266
1,887
1,611
37,459
970

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

11,424
30,332
8,282
31,884
409
11,976
2,447
7,692
13,461
3,310
6,244
3,368
9,162
10,266
1,887
1,611
37,459
970

228
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

25
26

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Demolition Munitions, All Types .................................................
Fuze, All Types ............................................................................

418
14,219

........................
........................

Total, Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine
Corps .........................................................................

206,821

........................

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
2013 1

$98,882,000
17,968,000
17,968,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,968,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

131

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Tactical Vehicles .........................................................................

17,968

........................

Total, Other Procurement, Navy ....................................

17,968

........................

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$822,054,000
129,584,000
126,686,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $126,686,000.
This is $2,898,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

10
11
13
15
17
18
23
26
29
30
42
43

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Javelin .........................................................................................
Follow On To SMAW ....................................................................
Modification Kits .........................................................................
Maintain Program Affordability: TOW Unit Cost Growth ...
Repair and Test Equipment .......................................................
Modification Kits .........................................................................
Items Under $5 million (Comm & Elec) ....................................
Intelligence Support Equipment .................................................
RQ–11 .........................................................................................
Common Computer Resources ....................................................
Command Post Systems .............................................................
Environmental Control Equip Assort ..........................................
Bulk Liquid Equipment ...............................................................

29,334
105
16,081
........................
16,081
2,831
8,170
2,700
2,830
4,866
265
114
523

29,334
105
13,183
........................
16,081
2,831
8,170
2,700
2,830
4,866
265
114
523

........................
........................
¥2,898
¥2,898
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

229
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

44
45
47
57

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Tactical Fuel Systems .................................................................
Power Equipment Assorted .........................................................
EOD Systems ...............................................................................
Family of Construction Equipment .............................................

365
2,004
42,930
385

........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Procurement Marine Corps .................................

129,584

126,686

¥2,898

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$305,600,000
115,668,000
115,668,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $115,668,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

32
52
59
64
79

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures ...................................
U–2 Mods ...................................................................................
C–130 .........................................................................................
RC–135 .......................................................................................
Aircraft Replacement Support Equip ..........................................

94,050
11,300
1,618
2,700
6,000

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ..........................

115,668

........................

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$34,350,000
24,200,000
24,200,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $24,200,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Predator Hellfire Missile .............................................................

24,200

........................

Total, Missile Procurement, Air Force ...........................

24,200

........................

230
PROCUREMENT

AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE

2013 1

$116,203,000
159,965,000
159,965,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $159,965,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

1
2
4
5
11
12
14

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Rockets .......................................................................................
Cartridges ...................................................................................
General Purpose Bombs .............................................................
Joint Direct Attack Munition .......................................................
Flares ..........................................................................................
Fuzes ...........................................................................................
Small Arms .................................................................................

326
17,634
37,514
84,459
14,973
3,859
1,200

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ...............

159,965

........................

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$2,680,270,000
2,574,846,000
2,554,596,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,554,596,000.
This is $20,250,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Weather Observation Forecast ....................................................
Milsatcom Space ........................................................................
Contingency Operations ..............................................................
Mobility Equipment .....................................................................
Defense Space Reconnaissance Prog. ........................................
Classified Programs ...................................................................
Classified adjustment .......................................................

1,800
5,695
60,600
68,000
58,250
2,380,501
........................

1,800
5,695
60,600
68,000
58,250
2,360,251
........................

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
¥20,250
¥20,250

Total, Other Procurement, Air Force ..............................

2,574,846

2,554,596

¥20,250

Line

22
46
59
61
68
68A

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
2013 1

$188,099,000
111,275,000
111,275,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

231
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $111,275,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

12
62
66
84
89

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Teleport Program ........................................................................
Ordnance Replenishment ............................................................
Intelligence Systems ...................................................................
Soldier Protection and Survival Systems ...................................
Operational Enhancements .........................................................
Classified Programs ...................................................................

4,760
2,841
13,300
8,034
3,354
78,986

........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total, Procurement, Defense-Wide ................................

111,275

........................

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION
The Committee recommends $88,708,000 for research, development, test and evaluation.
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, ARMY

$29,660,000
7,000,000
13,500,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $13,500,000.
This is $6,500,000 above the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Item

2014 budget
estimate

Soldier Support and Survivability ...............................................
Army identified transfer for Rapid Equipping Force from
Operation and maintenance, Army ...............................
Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles ..............................................

Line

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

........................

6,500

∂6,500

........................
7,000

∂6,500
........................

7,000

13,500

∂6,500

Total, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Army ..........................................................................

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, NAVY

2013 1

Appropriations,
...........................................................................
$52,519,000
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
34,426,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. ...........................
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends no appropriation.

232
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, AIR FORCE

$53,150,000
9,000,000
9,000,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,000,000. This
is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Classified Programs ...................................................................

9,000

........................

Total, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Air Force ....................................................................

9,000

........................

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST

AND

EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE

2013 1

$112,387,000
66,208,000
66,208,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $66,208,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Classified Programs ...................................................................

66,208

........................

Total, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation,
Defense-Wide ............................................................

66,208

........................

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS
DEFENSE WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$243,600,000
264,910,000
264,910,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $264,910,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the programs recommended by the
Committee:

233
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Prepositioned War Reserve Stocks .............................................

44,732

........................

Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Army .................

44,732

........................

Transportation .............................................................................

88,500

........................

Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Air Force ...........

88,500

........................

Defense Logistics Agency ...........................................................

131,678

........................

Total, Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense-wide ...

131,678

........................

Grand Total, Defense Working Capital Funds ..............

264,910

........................

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$993,898,000
904,201,000
898,701,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $898,701,000.
This is $5,500,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Operation and Maintenance:
In-House Care ....................................................................
Private Sector Care ............................................................
Improving funds management: Transitional Assistance Management Program unjustified growth ..
Consolidated Health Care ..................................................
Information Management/IT ..............................................
Management Headquarters ...............................................
Education and Training .....................................................

375,958
382,560

375,958
377,060

........................
¥5,500

........................
132,749
2,238
460
10,236

¥5,500
........................
........................
........................
........................

Total ..............................................................................

904,201

898,701

¥5,500

DRUG INTERDICTION
2013 1

AND

COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE

$469,025,000
376,305,000
376,305,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $376,305,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.

234
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

2014 budget
estimate

Item

010

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

Drug Interdiction And Counter-Drug Activities ..........................

376,305

........................

Total, Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities ...

376,305

........................

JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND
Appropriations, 2013 1 ...........................................................................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
Committee recommendation .................................................................
1 Does

$1,622,614,000
1,000,000,000
871,725,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $871,725,000.
This is $128,275,000 below the budget estimate.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

The following table details the program recommended by the
Committee:
[In thousands of dollars]
Line

Item

3
4

ATTACK THE NETWORK ................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Casual whisper delayed start .....................................................................
Maintain program affordability: JCAST excess funding ....
Restoring acquisition accountability: Net exploitation effort delayed new start ..................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Concurrency ...........
DEFEAT THE DEVICE ...................................................................
Budget documentation disparity: Handheld IED device ...
Budget documentation disparity: Personnel borne device
Budget documentation disparity: Unjustified sentinel
hawk request .................................................................
Transfer to Line #122 Army O&M OCO for RQ–7
sustainment ..................................................................
Restoring acquisition accountability: Unjustified sentinel
hawk request .................................................................
Budget documentation disparity: Unjustified siren program request .................................................................
Budget documentation disparity: Unjustified vehicle
based IED request .........................................................
TRAIN THE FORCE .......................................................................
STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE .....................................................
Authorization adjustment: Maintain level of effort ...........
Maintain program affordability: Supplies reduction .........
Total, JIEDDO .................................................................

2014 budget
estimate

Committee
recommendation

Change from
budget estimate

417,700

395,200

¥22,500

........................
........................

¥4,000
¥10,000

........................
........................
248,886
........................
........................

........................
........................
189,386
........................
........................

¥5,500
¥3,000
¥59,500
¥10,000
¥5,000

........................

¥2,000

........................

¥20,000

........................

¥10,000

........................

¥5,000

........................
106,000
227,414
........................
........................

........................
106,000
181,139
........................
........................

¥7,500
........................
¥46,275
¥45,000
¥1,275

1,000,000

871,725

¥128,275

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization.—
JIEDDO continues to support an important mission protecting our
troops from improvised explosive devices [IED]. The fiscal year
2014 request is $1,000,000,000 in overseas contingency operations.
The Committee remains concerned with lack of justification and redundancy in the JIEDDO program. Therefore, the Committee re-

235
duces the fiscal year 2014 request by $128,275,000 for specific activities that have been terminated since the budget was submitted,
lack of justification, or are duplicative of other ongoing counter-IED
efforts. The Committee concurs with S. 1197, the National Defense
Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014, as reported, in regard to
training the force; however, retains the funding in JIEDDO for fiscal year 2014. The Committee directs all future counter-IED training to be conducted by the appropriate service. The Committee also
rescinds $59,000,000 as a result of terminated programs.
Lastly, the Committee is concerned with JIEDDO’s use of contractors. JIEDDO has 93 individual service contracts which authorizes 2,333 contractor positions, some of which are doing inherit government work. In addition, the committee is concerned with the
costs of the contractors. For example, the Contractor Support Services contract is for 361 people and costs $83,400,000, which is
roughly $230,700 per position; whereas the costs of a government
civilian is approximately $100,000 less per full-time equivalent. As
a result, the Committee recommends a 25 percent reduction or
$45,000,000 to the staff and infrastructure request.
JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
Appropriations, 2013 1 ........................................................................... ...........................
Budget estimate, 2014 ...........................................................................
$15,000,000
Committee recommendation ................................................................. ...........................
1 Does

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends no funding for the Joint Urgent
Operational Needs Fund.
OFFICE

OF THE INSPECTOR

GENERAL

2013 1

$10,766,000
10,766,000
10,766,000

not reflect the March 1, 2013, sequester of funds under Public Law 112–25.

The Committee recommends an appropriation of $10,766,000.
This is equal to the budget estimate.
GENERAL PROVISIONS—THIS TITLE
SEC. 9001. Provides that funds made available in this title are
in addition to amounts appropriated or made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014.
SEC. 9002. Provides special transfer authority of up to
$4,000,000,000 of funds in this title, subject to the terms and conditions in this act.
SEC. 9003. Provides the authority to obligate supervision and administration costs associated with overseas construction projects at
the time the project was awarded.
SEC. 9004. Provides for the procurement of motor vehicles for use
by military and civilian employees of the Department of Defense in
Afghanistan.
SEC. 9005. Provides authority up to $50,000,000 of funds in this
title to fund the Commander’s Emergency Response Program.
SEC. 9006. Provides for the use of funds to lift and sustain coalition forces supporting military and stability operations in Iraq and

236
Afghanistan and requires quarterly reports to the congressional defense committees.
SEC. 9007. Prohibits the use of funds made available in this act
to establish any permanent military installation or base in Iraq or
Afghanistan.
SEC. 9008. Prohibits the use of funds in this act to contravene
laws enacted or regulations promulgated to implement the United
Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
SEC. 9009. Requires the Afghanistan Resource Oversight Council
to oversee several programs in Afghanistan.
SEC. 9010. Provides authority for funding the Task Force for
Business and Stability Operations.
SEC. 9012. Provides authority for funding the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
SEC. 9013. Recessions.—The Committee recommends a general
provision rescinding funds from prior years as displayed below:
Amount

2009/XXXX Appropriations
General Provisions:
Retroactive Stop Loss Special Pay Program ...............................................................................................

$50,900,000

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI OF THE
STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment to
the House bill ‘‘which proposes an item of appropriation which is
not made to carry out the provisions of an existing law, a treaty
stipulation, or an act or resolution previously passed by the Senate
during that session.’’
The Committee is filing an original bill, which is not covered
under this rule, but reports this information in the spirit of full disclosure.
The Committee recommends funding for the following accounts
which currently lack authorization for fiscal year 2014:
Military Personnel, Army
Military Personnel, Navy
Military Personnel, Marine Corps
Military Personnel, Air Force
Reserve Personnel, Army
Reserve Personnel, Navy
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps
Reserve Personnel, Air Force
National Guard Personnel, Army
National Guard Personnel, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Army
Operation and Maintenance, Navy
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Environmental Restoration, Army
Environmental Restoration, Navy
Environmental Restoration, Air Force
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund
Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund
Aircraft Procurement, Army
Missile Procurement, Army
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army
(237)

238
Procurement of Ammunition, Army
Other Procurement, Army
Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Weapons Procurement, Navy
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy
Carrier Replacement Program
Virginia Class Submarine
Virginia Class Submarine [AP]
CVN Refueling Overhaul
CVN Refueling Overhauls [AP]
DDG–1000 Program
DDG–51 Destroyer
DDG–51 Destroyer [AP]
Littoral Combat Ship
Afloat Forward Staging Base
Joint High Speed Vessel
Moored Training Ship
LCAC Service Life Extension Program
Outfitting, Post Delivery, Conversions and First Destination
Transportation
Completion of Prior year Shipbuilding Programs
Other Procurement, Navy
Procurement, Marine Corps
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Missile Procurement, Air Force
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force
Other Procurement, Air Force
Procurement, Defense-Wide
National Guard and Reserve Equipment
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense
Defense Working Capital Funds
National Defense Sealift Fund
Defense Health Program
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund
Office of the Inspector General
Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System
Fund
Intelligence Community Management Account
Ship Modernization, Operations and Sustainment Fund

239
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI OF THE
STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on August 1, 2013, the
Committee ordered favorably an original bill (S. 1429) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes, provided that the
bill be subject to further amendment and that the bill be consistent
with its spending allocations, by a recorded vote of 22–8, a quorum
being present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas

Chairwoman Mikulski
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Harkin
Mrs. Murray
Mrs. Feinstein
Mr. Durbin
Mr. Johnson
Ms. Landrieu
Mr. Reed
Mr. Pryor
Mr. Tester
Mr. Udall
Mrs. Shaheen
Mr. Merkley
Mr. Begich
Mr. Coons
Mr. Cochran
Ms. Collins
Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Kirk
Mr. Blunt
Mr. Moran

Nays

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Shelby
McConnell
Alexander
Graham
Coats
Hoeven
Johanns
Boozman

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE
STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports on
a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute or part
of any statute include ‘‘(a) the text of the statute or part thereof
which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a comparative print of
that part of the bill or joint resolution making the amendment and
of the statute or part thereof proposed to be amended, showing by
stricken-through type and italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical devices the omissions and insertions which
would be made by the bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form
recommended by the Committee.’’
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such provisions.

240
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC.
308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93–344, AS AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
Budget authority
Committee
guidance 1

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee guidance to
its subcommittees of amounts in the budget resolution for
2014: Subcommittee on Defense:
Mandatory ............................................................................
Discretionary ........................................................................
Security .......................................................................
Nonsecurity .................................................................
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2014 .....................................................................................
2015 .....................................................................................
2016 .....................................................................................
2017 .....................................................................................
2018 and future years ........................................................
Financial assistance to State and local governments for
2014 .........................................................................................
1 There

Amount
in bill

Outlays
Committee
guidance

Amount
in bill

2 514

NA
516,624
516,416
208

514
594,411
594,203
208

NA
NA
NA
NA

....................
....................
....................
....................
....................

3 375,597

....................

2 585,968

NA
NA

131,658
47,307
20,762
13,671

is no section 302(a) allocation to the Committee in fiscal year 2014.
outlays from prior-year budget authority.
outlays from prior-year budget authority.

2 Includes

3 Excludes

NA: Not applicable.
Consistent with the funding recommended in the bill for overseas contingency operations and in accordance with section 251(b)(2)(A)(II) of
the BBEDCA of 1985, the Committee anticipates that the Budget Committee will provide, at the appropriate time, section 302(a) allocation for
the Committee on Appropriations reflecting an upward adjustment of $77,787,000,000 in budget authority plus associated outlays.

Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation
Operation

and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and

Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,
Maintenance,

Army .......................................................................................................................................
Navy .......................................................................................................................................
Marine Corps .........................................................................................................................
Air Force ................................................................................................................................
Defense-Wide .........................................................................................................................
Army Reserve .........................................................................................................................
Navy Reserve .........................................................................................................................
Marine Corps Reserve ...........................................................................................................
Air Force Reserve ...................................................................................................................
Army National Guard .............................................................................................................
Air National Guard ................................................................................................................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
35,362,531
41,559,535
6,026,999
34,734,507
31,820,931
3,178,723
1,254,689
277,011
3,257,020
7,144,720
6,485,756

127,364,770

Total, title I, Military Personnel ..............................................................................................................................
TITLE II

40,146,213
26,866,844
12,515,011
28,015,805
4,450,941
1,871,550
657,382
1,720,152
7,971,044
3,149,828

2013
appropriation

Military Personnel, Army .......................................................................................................................................................
Military Personnel, Navy .......................................................................................................................................................
Military Personnel, Marine Corps .........................................................................................................................................
Military Personnel, Air Force ................................................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Army ......................................................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Navy ......................................................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps .........................................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Air Force ................................................................................................................................................
National Guard Personnel, Army ..........................................................................................................................................
National Guard Personnel, Air Force ....................................................................................................................................

MILITARY PERSONNEL

TITLE I

Item

[In thousands of dollars]

35,073,077
39,945,237
6,254,650
37,270,842
32,997,693
3,095,036
1,197,752
263,317
3,164,607
7,054,196
6,566,004

130,399,881

41,037,790
27,824,444
12,905,216
28,519,877
4,565,261
1,891,936
677,499
1,758,629
8,041,268
3,177,961

Budget estimate

36,938,580
41,613,205
6,359,736
37,626,333
32,597,068
3,096,436
1,208,552
261,317
3,148,307
7,082,599
6,505,204

129,133,927

40,796,005
27,606,615
12,720,114
28,252,060
4,430,784
1,846,795
657,841
1,719,497
7,959,072
3,145,144

Committee
recommendation

∂1,865,503
∂1,667,968
∂105,086
∂355,491
¥400,625
∂1,400
∂10,800
¥2,000
¥16,300
∂28,403
¥60,800

¥1,265,954

∂1,769,157

∂1,576,049
∂53,670
∂332,737
∂2,891,826
∂776,137
¥82,287
¥46,137
¥15,694
¥108,713
¥62,121
∂19,448

¥241,785
¥217,829
¥185,102
¥267,817
¥134,477
¥45,141
¥19,658
¥39,132
¥82,196
¥32,817

Budget estimate

∂649,792
∂739,771
∂205,103
∂236,255
¥20,157
¥24,755
∂459
¥655
¥11,972
¥4,684

2013
appropriation

Senate Committee recommendation
compared with
(∂ or ¥)

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014

241

..........................
13,498
335,478
310,184
528,565
11,118
287,164
108,615
518,426
50,132
173,265,602

100,218,282
(100,218,282)
..........................

Item

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Account ...........................................................................................................
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ........................................................................................................
Environmental Restoration, Army .........................................................................................................................................
Environmental Restoration, Navy .........................................................................................................................................
Environmental Restoration, Air Force ...................................................................................................................................
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide ...........................................................................................................................
Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites ...................................................................................................
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid ................................................................................................................
Cooperative Threat Reduction Account ................................................................................................................................
Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund ......................................................................................

Total, title II, Operation and maintenance .............................................................................................................

Total, title III, Procurement .....................................................................................................................................
Fiscal year 2014 ............................................................................................................................................
Advance appropriations fiscal year 2015 .....................................................................................................

8,665,177
16,941,012
25,399,175
18,607,358
223,473
69,836,195

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army ...........................................................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy ...........................................................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force .....................................................................................................
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide .............................................................................................
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense ..........................................................................................................................

Total, title IV, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation ................................................................................

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION

TITLE IV

TITLE III

2013
appropriation

[In thousands of dollars]

67,520,236

7,989,102
15,974,780
25,702,946
17,667,108
186,300

99,106,242
(98,153,503)
(952,739)

175,097,941

5,000
13,606
298,815
316,103
439,820
10,757
237,443
109,500
528,455
256,031

Budget estimate

65,806,815

7,576,342
15,403,145
24,945,541
17,695,487
186,300

98,368,753
(98,368,753)
..........................

178,573,167

..........................
13,606
298,815
316,103
439,820
10,757
287,443
109,500
528,455
131,331

Committee
recommendation

¥1,713,421

¥4,029,380

¥737,489
(∂215,250)
(¥952,739)

¥1,849,529
(¥1,849,529)
..........................

¥412,760
¥571,635
¥757,405
∂28,379
..........................

∂3,475,226

∂5,307,565

¥1,088,835
¥1,537,867
¥453,634
¥911,871
¥37,173

¥5,000
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
∂50,000
..........................
..........................
¥124,700

Budget estimate

..........................
∂108
¥36,663
∂5,919
¥88,745
¥361
∂279
∂885
∂10,029
∂81,199

2013
appropriation

Senate Committee recommendation
compared with
(∂ or ¥)

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued

242

TITLE V

2,211,102

Total, title V, Revolving and Management Funds ..................................................................................................

32,672,129

635,004
18,567
646,497
1,300,068
1,157,733
..........................
349,859
35,479,789

Total, Defense Health Program ...............................................................................................................................

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense:
Operation and maintenance ........................................................................................................................................
Procurement .................................................................................................................................................................
Research, development, test and evaluation .............................................................................................................

Total, Chemical Agents ...........................................................................................................................................

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense .....................................................................................................
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ..................................................................................................................................
Office of the Inspector General ............................................................................................................................................

Total, title VI, Other Department of Defense Programs .........................................................................................

514,000
533,716
1,047,716

Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund .................................................................................
Intelligence Community Management Account (ICMA) ........................................................................................................

Total, title VII, Related agencies ............................................................................................................................

RELATED AGENCIES

TITLE VII

30,844,406
521,073
1,306,650

Defense Health Program:
Operation and maintenance ........................................................................................................................................
Procurement .................................................................................................................................................................
Research, development, test and evaluation .............................................................................................................

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

TITLE VI

1,514,183
696,919

Defense Working Capital Funds ...........................................................................................................................................
National Defense Sealift Fund .............................................................................................................................................

REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS

1,082,271

514,000
568,271

35,461,127

938,545
98,800
312,131

1,057,123

451,572
1,368
604,183

33,054,528

31,653,734
671,181
729,613

2,276,527

1,545,827
730,700

1,082,671

514,000
568,671

36,080,718

1,068,545
..........................
348,031

1,057,123

451,572
1,368
604,183

33,607,019

31,617,225
671,181
1,318,613

2,304,205

1,695,827
608,378

∂400

∂619,591

∂600,929

∂34,955

∂130,000
¥98,800
∂35,900

¥89,188
..........................
¥1,828

..........................
∂400

..........................

¥242,945

..........................
∂34,955

..........................
..........................
..........................

∂552,491

∂934,890

¥183,432
¥17,199
¥42,314

¥36,509
..........................
∂589,000

∂27,678

∂93,103

∂772,819
∂150,108
∂11,963

∂150,000
¥122,322

∂181,644
¥88,541

243

269,644
..........................
2,378,956
¥72,718
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
504,341

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide (Sec. 8105) .....................................................................................................
(transfer authority) ......................................................................................................................................................
Ship Modernization, Operations, Sustainment Fund (Sec. 8102) ........................................................................................
Eliminate civilian pay raise (Sec. 8119) .............................................................................................................................
Sexual assault special victims program (Sec. 8115) .........................................................................................................
A–12 Aircraft litigation in-kind settlement .........................................................................................................................
General/Flag Officers (Sec. 8069) ........................................................................................................................................
Revised econonmic assumptions (Sec. 8106) .....................................................................................................................
Superintendents Commission (Sec. 8105) ...........................................................................................................................

Total, Title VIII, General Provisions ........................................................................................................................

Alternative Energy Resources for Deployed

(4,000,000)
14,980
..........................
¥2,142,447
..........................
..........................
3,995
43,942
7,989
..........................
..........................
..........................

2013
appropriation

Additional transfer authority (Sec. 8005) ............................................................................................................................
Indian Financing Act incentives (Sec. 8019) ......................................................................................................................
FFRDC (Sec. 8023) ...............................................................................................................................................................
Rescissions (Sec. 8040) .......................................................................................................................................................
O&M, Defense-wide transfer authority (Sec. 8051) .............................................................................................................
Global Security Contingency Fund (O&M, Defense-wide transfer) (Sec. 8068) ..................................................................
Fisher House Foundation ......................................................................................................................................................
National grants (Sec. 8077) ................................................................................................................................................
Shipbuilding & conversion funds, Navy (Sec. 8081) ...........................................................................................................
Fisher House transfer authority (Sec. 8093) .......................................................................................................................
ICMA transfer authority (Sec. 8088) ....................................................................................................................................
Defense Health O&M transfer authority (Sec. 8098) ...........................................................................................................

GENERAL PROVISIONS

TITLE VIII

Item

[In thousands of dollars]

..........................
..........................
324,400
..........................
25,000
..........................
¥8,000
¥242,000
2,000
¥1,510,465

¥913,571

(5,000,000)
..........................
¥40,000
¥1,599,865
(30,000)
(200,000)
..........................
20,000
8,000
(11,000)
(20,000)
(143,087)

..........................
(273,300)
..........................
..........................
..........................
100,000
..........................
..........................
..........................

(4,000,000)
..........................
..........................
¥1,021,571
(30,000)
(200,000)
..........................
..........................
8,000
(11,000)
(20,000)
(143,087)

Budget estimate

Committee
recommendation

¥596,894

..........................
(¥273,300)
∂324,400
..........................
∂25,000
¥100,000
¥8,000
¥242,000
∂2,000

¥269,644
..........................
¥2,054,556
∂72,718
∂25,000
..........................
¥8,000
¥242,000
∂2,000
¥2,014,806

(∂1,000,000)
..........................
¥40,000
¥578,294
..........................
..........................
..........................
∂20,000
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................

Budget estimate

(∂1,000,000)
¥14,980
¥40,000
∂542,582
(∂30,000)
(∂200,000)
¥3,995
¥23,942
∂11
(∂11,000)
(∂20,000)
(∂143,087)

2013
appropriation

Senate Committee recommendation
compared with
(∂ or ¥)

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued

244

TITLE IX

9,790,082
774,225
1,425,156
1,286,783
156,893
39,335
24,722
25,348
583,804
10,473
14,116,821
28,452,018
5,839,934
..........................
4,116,340
9,249,736
7,714,079
(1,650,000)
157,887
55,924
25,477
60,618
392,448
34,500
582,884
56,681,845
325,000
5,124,167
62,131,012

Military Personnel, Army (OCO) ............................................................................................................................................
Military Personnel, Navy (OCO) ............................................................................................................................................
Military Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO) ..............................................................................................................................
Military Personnel, Air Force (OCO) ......................................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Army (OCO) ...........................................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Navy (OCO) ............................................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps (OCO) ..............................................................................................................................
Reserve Personnel, Air Force (OCO) .....................................................................................................................................
National Guard Personnel, Army (OCO) ...............................................................................................................................
National Guard Personnel, Air Force (OCO) .........................................................................................................................

Total, Military Personnel .........................................................................................................................................

Operation & Maintenance, Army (OCO) ...............................................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Navy (OCO) ................................................................................................................................
Coast Guard (by transfer) (OCO) ................................................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps (OCO) ..................................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force (OCO) .........................................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide (OCO) ..................................................................................................................
Coalition support funds (OCO) ....................................................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve (OCO) ..................................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve (OCO) ..................................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve (OCO) ....................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve (OCO) ...........................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard (OCO) ......................................................................................................
Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard (OCO) .........................................................................................................
Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund (OCO) .....................................................................................................

Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance ....................................................................................................................

Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund (OCO) ...............................................................................................................................
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (OCO) .............................................................................................................................

Total, Operation and Maintenance .........................................................................................................................

Military Personnel

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

62,829,052

279,000
7,726,720

54,823,332

29,279,633
6,067,993
(227,033)
2,669,815
10,005,224
6,435,078
(1,500,000)
42,935
55,700
12,534
32,849
199,371
22,200
..........................

9,689,307

6,747,515
558,344
1,019,322
867,087
40,952
20,238
15,134
20,432
393,364
6,919

60,586,019

279,000
6,944,920

53,362,099

28,663,919
5,329,960
..........................
2,603,329
9,964,224
6,435,078
(1,500,000)
42,935
55,700
12,534
32,849
199,371
22,200
..........................

9,405,307

6,463,515
558,344
1,019,322
867,087
40,952
20,238
15,134
20,432
393,364
6,919

¥284,000
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
¥284,000
¥615,714
¥738,033
(¥227,033)
¥66,486
¥41,000
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
¥1,461,233
..........................
¥781,800
¥2,243,033

¥3,326,567
¥215,881
¥405,834
¥419,696
¥115,941
¥19,097
¥9,588
¥4,916
¥190,440
¥3,554
¥4,711,514
∂211,901
¥509,974
..........................
¥1,513,011
∂714,488
¥1,279,001
(¥150,000)
¥114,952
¥224
¥12,943
¥27,769
¥193,077
¥12,300
¥582,884
¥3,319,746
¥46,000
∂1,820,753
¥1,544,993

245

247,716

Total, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation ..............................................................................................

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
29,660
52,519
53,150
112,387

Test
Test
Test
Test

& Evaluation, Army (OCO) ....................................................................................................
& Evaluation, Navy (OCO) ....................................................................................................
& Evaluation, Air Force (OCO) ..............................................................................................
and Evaluation, Defense-Wide (OCO) ...................................................................................

Development,
Development,
Development,
Development,

8,979,438

Total, Procurement ..................................................................................................................................................

Research,
Research,
Research,
Research,

550,700
67,951
15,422
338,493
1,740,157
215,698
22,500
283,059
98,882
822,054
305,600
34,350
116,203
2,680,270
188,099
1,500,000

2013
appropriation

Aircraft Procurement, Army (OCO) .......................................................................................................................................
Missile Procurement, Army (OCO) ........................................................................................................................................
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army (OCO) ...............................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Army (OCO) ............................................................................................................................
Other Procurement, Army (OCO) ...........................................................................................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Navy (OCO) ........................................................................................................................................
Weapons Procurement, Navy (OCO) .....................................................................................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps (OCO) ..............................................................................................
Other Procurement, Navy (OCO) ...........................................................................................................................................
Procurement, Marine Corps (OCO) .......................................................................................................................................
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (OCO) .................................................................................................................................
Missile Procurement, Air Force (OCO) ..................................................................................................................................
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force (OCO) .....................................................................................................................
Other Procurement, Air Force (OCO) ....................................................................................................................................
Procurement, Defense-Wide (OCO) .......................................................................................................................................
National Guard and Reserve Equipment (OCO) ...................................................................................................................

Procurement

Item

[In thousands of dollars]

116,634

7,000
34,426
9,000
66,208

5,351,979

771,788
128,645
..........................
180,900
603,123
240,696
86,500
206,821
17,968
129,584
115,668
24,200
159,965
2,574,846
111,275
..........................

Budget estimate

88,708

13,500
..........................
9,000
66,208

5,171,602

633,300
128,645
..........................
190,900
603,902
211,176
86,500
206,821
17,968
126,686
115,668
24,200
159,965
2,554,596
111,275
..........................

Committee
recommendation

¥27,926

¥159,008

¥180,377

¥3,807,836

∂6,500
¥34,426
..........................
..........................

¥138,488
..........................
..........................
∂10,000
∂779
¥29,520
..........................
..........................
..........................
¥2,898
..........................
..........................
..........................
¥20,250
..........................
..........................

∂82,600
∂60,694
¥15,422
¥147,593
¥1,136,255
¥4,522
∂64,000
¥76,238
¥80,914
¥695,368
¥189,932
¥10,150
∂43,762
¥125,674
¥76,824
¥1,500,000

¥16,160
¥52,519
¥44,150
¥46,179

Budget estimate

2013
appropriation

Senate Committee recommendation
compared with
(∂ or ¥)

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued

246

(4,000,000)
..........................
..........................

993,898
993,898
469,025
1,622,614
..........................
10,766
3,096,303

(3,500,000)
¥1,860,052
¥1,860,052

Total, Defense Health Program ...............................................................................................................................

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense (OCO) ..........................................................................................
Joint IED Defeat Fund (OCO) ................................................................................................................................................
Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund (OCO) .......................................................................................................................
Office of the Inspector General (OCO) .................................................................................................................................

Total, Other Department of Defense Programs ......................................................................................................

Additional transfer authority (OCO) (Sec. 9002) .................................................................................................................
Rescissions (OCO) (Sec. 9013) ............................................................................................................................................

Total, General Provisions ........................................................................................................................................

596,882,635

62,825
1,310
24,200
88,335

Overseas Contingency operations (OCO) .......................................................................................................
Rescissions overseas contingency operations ...............................................................................................

Total for the bill (net) ...............................................................................................................................

Operation and Maintenance (emergency) ............................................................................................................................
Procurement (emergency) .....................................................................................................................................................
Defense working capital funds (emergency) .......................................................................................................................

Total, Fiscal year 2013 Disaster Relief (Public Law 113–2) .................................................................................

DISASTER RELIEF APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2013

86,954,838
(88,814,890)
(¥1,860,052)

Total, Title IX ..........................................................................................................................................................

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Other Department of Defense Programs

Defense Health Program:
Operation and maintenance (OCO) .............................................................................................................................

..........................

..........................
..........................
..........................

590,588,808

(80,558,154)
..........................

80,558,154

2,306,272

376,305
1,000,000
15,000
10,766

904,201

264,910

243,600

Total, Revolving and Management Funds ..............................................................................................................

264,910

243,600

Revolving and Management Funds

Defense Working Capital Funds (OCO) ................................................................................................................................

..........................

..........................
..........................
..........................

587,462,934

(77,674,043)
(¥50,900)

77,623,143

¥50,900

(4,000,000)
¥50,900

2,157,497

376,305
871,725
..........................
10,766

898,701

264,910

..........................
¥128,275
¥15,000
..........................
¥148,775

¥92,720
¥750,889
..........................
..........................
¥938,806

¥3,125,874

..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................

¥9,419,701

¥62,825
¥1,310
¥24,200
¥88,335

¥2,935,011
(¥2,884,111)
(¥50,900)

¥9,331,695
(¥11,140,847)
(∂1,809,152)

¥50,900

∂1,809,152

..........................
¥50,900

¥5,500

¥95,197

(∂500,000)
∂1,809,152

¥5,500

..........................

∂21,310

¥95,197

..........................

∂21,310

247

596,970,970
(512,070,244)
(88,814,890)
(¥2,142,447)
(¥1,860,052)
(88,335)
..........................
..........................

Net grand total .......................................................................................................................................................
Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................
Overseas Contingency operations (OCO) .......................................................................................................
Rescissions ....................................................................................................................................................
Rescissions overseas contingency operations ...............................................................................................
Emergency appropriations .............................................................................................................................
Advance appropriations fiscal year 2015 .....................................................................................................
(By transfer) ................................................................................................................................................................

88,335

2013
appropriation

Total, Other Appropriations .....................................................................................................................................

Item

[In thousands of dollars]

589,636,069
(510,099,486)
(80,558,154)
(¥1,021,571)
..........................
..........................
(952,739)
..........................

..........................

Budget estimate

587,462,934
(511,439,656)
(77,674,043)
(¥1,599,865)
(¥50,900)
..........................
..........................
..........................

..........................

Committee
recommendation

..........................
¥2,173,135
(∂1,340,170)
(¥2,884,111)
(¥578,294)
(¥50,900)
..........................
(¥952,739)
..........................

¥9,508,036
(¥630,588)
(¥11,140,847)
(∂542,582)
(∂1,809,152)
(¥88,335)
..........................
..........................

Budget estimate

¥88,335

2013
appropriation

Senate Committee recommendation
compared with
(∂ or ¥)

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued

248

File Type	application/pdf
File Title	U:\2014REPT\02REPT\02REPT.000
File Modified	2015-05-05
File Created	2013-08-01