OMB Control No: 0970-0401
Expiration date: 5/31/2018
Unit 4 Pre-Test
__________________________________________________________________________________
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average .12 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Instructions:
The following pre-test questions are designed to measure your pre-existing knowledge about the concepts presented in the content.
Questions
The degree to which the intervention components are delivered as designed is known as:
Fidelity
Reliability
Validity
Intervention tension
When Diamond County conducted an evaluation of Trauma Focus, the intervention was explained to caregivers of children chosen to receive the intervention. Caregivers had the option of withdrawing from Trauma Focus at any time. This is an example of:
A strategy to reduce staff workload
A safeguard to protect participants
An ineffectively implemented intervention protocol
All of the above
Diamond County delivered the Trauma Focus intervention for a year to serve enough children to have valid study results. Why is the number of children in the study significant to the evidence-building process?
The process of building evidence always takes at least a year.
The number of persons receiving an intervention and a comparison needs to be large enough to reliably detect genuine differences should they occur.
Frontline staff need timelines indicating how long to implement a protocol.
The number of children involved raises ethical concerns.
An
example of a tension that frontline child welfare staff might feel
in the context of building evidence is:
A difference of opinion about how best to determine which children and families receive an intervention
A feeling that participating in studies will add work when they already feel overwhelmed by their workload
A sense that conducting research with children and families raises ethical issues
All of the above
Which of the following is a possible resolution to the tensions frontline staff may feel about participating in evidence building efforts?
Use of Institutional Review Boards to protect research participants
Strategies to minimize extra work associated with studies
Researchers actively collaborating with frontline child welfare staff
All of the above
In the context of building evidence, elements of “practicing humility” would include:
Demonstrating a modest and humble attitude
Respecting and valuing the differences among people
Being open to challenges to one’s own practices, beliefs, and biases
When intervention participants decide for themselves whether to participate in an intervention, it is known as:
Self-selection
Individual participation
Random selection
All of the above
A frontline worker’s ability to use one’s knowledge, skills, and values as a basis for decision-making is best known as:
A practice model
An evidence-supported intervention
Practitioner expertise
None of the above
What phenomenon explains why enthusiastic implementers of a new intervention might believe it is working well even if they don’t have evidence it is having a positive effect?
True or False: A rigorous evaluation that fails to find strong, significant differences in outcomes between an intervention and a comparison is a poor use of limited resources because it fails to inform evidence-building efforts.
True
False
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Karen Fenton-Leshore |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-20 |