Information Collection Request
New
ASSESSMENT OF CANCER PREVENTION SERVICES AT COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS
OMB Control No. #0920-XXXX
Supporting Statement: Part A
August 3, 2017
Program Official/Contact
Brooke Steele, D.O.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
Atlanta, Georgia
Phone: (770) 488-4261
Fax: (770) 488-4335
E-mail: [email protected]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUSTIFICATION
A1. Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary
A2. Purposes and Use of Information Collection
A3. Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction
A4. Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information
A5. Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities
A6. Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently
A7. Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5
A8. Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside the Agency
A9. Explanation of Any Payment or Gift to Respondents
A10. Protection of the Privacy and Confidentiality of Information Provided by Respondents
A11. Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Justification for Sensitive Questions
A12. Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
A13. Estimates of Other Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents or Record Keepers
A14. Estimates of Annualized Cost to the Federal Government
A15. Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments
A16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule
A17. Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate
A18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
ATTACHMENTS
APP. 1 Authorizing Legislation
APP. 2 60-Day Federal Register Notice
APP. 3 IRB Approval
APP. 4 Clinician and Administrator Survey Instruments
APP. 5 Interview Guides
APP. 6 Recruitment and Reminder Materials
APP. 7 Survey Web Pages
APP. 8 Consent Materials
APP. 9 Clinician and Administrator Pilot Feedback Forms
Goal of the study: To assess barriers and facilitators to providing cancer prevention services at community mental health centers (CMHCS) in the United States, we will conduct two surveys of psychiatric clinicians and administrators at selected facilities.
Intended use of the resulting data: Study findings will be disseminated to target audiences such as National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program grantees and their state/local partners, other cancer prevention and control entities, CMHC staff, AHRQ, HRSA, NIH, and SAMSHA to help inform strategies that reduce cancer risk factors and improve cancer screening among persons with mental illness.
Methods to be used to collect data: Two internet-based surveys will be conducted among psychiatric clinicians and administrators from a sample of CMHCs, and a subsample of each group will be interviewed by telephone.
The subpopulation to be studied: The primary target audiences are psychiatric clinicians and administrators at CMHCs.
How data will be analyzed: Statistical analyses of quantitative and qualitative data.
A. JUSTIFICATION
1. Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC), requests a two-year OMB approval for a new study titled “Assessment of Cancer Prevention Services at Community Mental Health Centers.” The CDC proposes to survey psychiatric clinicians and administrators at selected CMHCs to assess the capacities of the centers to offer cancer prevention services (e.g., patient education about cancer risk factors, cancer screening or screening referrals, and tobacco cessation counseling or treatment). The objectives of the project are the following: (1) describe the capacity of CMHCs to provide cancer prevention services; (2) describe any written policies and procedures at CMHCs for providing these services; (3) describe any collaboration of CMHCs with health care providers or community health workers/organizations to provide these services; and (4) describe any barriers to providing cancer prevention services. If any CHMCs do offer these services, we will inquire about best practices and lessons learned.
In 2014, an estimated 43.6 million adults in the United States reported having any type of mental illness (MI) in the previous year, and 9.8 million had serious mental illness resulting in functional impairment.1 Cancer incidence among persons with and without MI is similar; however, cancer mortality is higher among the former group.2, 3 People with MI smoke at rates approximately twice that of adults without MI, which increases their risks of lung cancer and other tobacco-related cancers.4, 5 Receipt of cancer screening among people with MI, however, is lower compared with the general population.6, 7 Many people with MI receive care at CMHCs, which are the largest group of public-sector mental health providers in the US.8 In 2012, nearly 25% of adults aged 18 years or older with any MI who received outpatient mental health services visited an outpatient mental health clinic or center.9 Although clients at CMHCs often have multiple comorbidities, many of these facilities do not provide primary care services.8, 10, 11 One solution to bridging this gap is integrated care, which is the systematic coordination of general and behavioral health care. SAMHSA has fostered this approach through its Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration Grants (PBHCI) program, with cardiovascular health being the primary care focus. Since 2009, SAMHSA has funded 187 PBHCI grantees to develop behavioral health homes for their enrollees.9 Less is known about provision of cancer prevention-related services in these and similar settings. A recent study of clients at a publicly funded mental health program reported low levels of cancer screening referrals among eligible patients.12 The proposed project, Assessment of Cancer Prevention Services at Community Mental Health Centers, would build on the integrated health care model by exploring the capacity of CMHCs to provide or make referrals to cancer prevention and screening services.
2. Purpose and Use of the Information Collection
The intended uses of the resulting data are to identify cancer prevention and screening/early detection services provided by CMHCs; existing/potential collaborations between CMHCs and local health care providers, community health workers, and community organizations to provide these services; barriers to providing these services; and awareness of cancer prevention resources.
To our knowledge, data have not been collected previously from CMHC clinicians and administrators about the capacities of these facilities to provide cancer prevention and screening/early detection services. Assessing whether cancer prevention education and other risk reduction strategies such as tobacco cessation counseling/treatment are available will identify gaps in access to these services. Inquiring about collaborations with health care providers, community health workers, and community health organizations could help identify promising practices and inform strategies to address gaps in services. Assessing awareness of cancer prevention and control resources will identify gaps in knowledge about evidence-based cancer prevention interventions (e.g., interventions in the Guide to Community Preventive Services) as well as government programs that provide free and low-cost cancer screening services. Cancer-related strategies in the Community Guide include interventions that help reduce out-of-pocket costs associated with screening; these costs limit access to health care services for some people with MI. Similarly, the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and some Colorectal Cancer Control Program grantees provide services to underinsured and uninsured low-income adults. We will also inquire about respondents’ awareness of National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP)-supported activities in their jurisdictions. NCCCP funds grantees to partner with health-care systems, health care providers, community organizations, and other entities to develop and implement cancer control plans (see APP. 1). These plans include goals and strategies to reduce disparities in access to cancer prevention, screening/early detection services, and treatment.
Findings from the proposed study will be disseminated and used by CDC researchers and administrators to understand the extent to which CMHCs provide cancer prevention services, as well as any barriers and facilitators to providing and making referrals for these services. Results will be shared with DCPC staff, CMHC psychiatric clinicians and administrators, cancer control programs and organizations, AHRQ, HRSA, NIH, SAMSHA, and policymakers. CDC’s DCPC is responsible for investigating and promoting evidence-based, population-based cancer prevention and early detection activities.
3. Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction
The proposed study will use information technology to (1) identify and recruit eligible CMHC psychiatric clinicians and administrators, (2) to distribute the data collection instrument via online surveys, and (3) to send participants reminders to complete requested data collection activities. The online surveys will be accessible by hyperlink on computers and mobile devices. The contractor will use their existing survey software tool. This tool allows for hosting and deploying surveys, as well as monitoring results. The instruments and interview guides will be pilot tested with a total of 9 CMHC psychiatric clinicians and administrators.
4. Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information
During development of the project, the CDC project team consulted with an advisory panel of researchers and public health professionals experienced in cancer prevention among persons with mental illness (see Section B). Their observations included but were not limited to the following: research on this topic is limited, some CMHC clinicians are becoming more interested in overall health outcomes and would welcome information from the proposed study, and some publicly funded mental health care facilities that plan to integrate cancer prevention services are interested in lessons learned by other programs. The CDC project team also reached out to staff at AHRQ, HRSA, NCI, NIMH, and SAMHSA to learn about any relevant data collection activities, as well as any interest in receiving and/or using findings from the study. The representatives confirmed that these agencies do not routinely collect information about cancer prevention and screening services at CMHCs (see summary of relevant data collections below). Agencies that work on identifying high-priority clinical preventive services and integrating primary and behavioral care services (e.g., AHRQ, SAMHSA) would like to receive the study results.
During the pre-development stage of the project, the lead investigator conducted a literature search of databases including PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Google Scholar to describe the state of knowledge regarding the capacities of CMHCs to provide general medical services. Research on this topic has been limited, and largely focused on provision of screening for cardiovascular disease and diabetes.8-11 Since the original literature search was conducted, at least four additional studies that address cancer prevention among persons with mental illness have been published. However, none captured the comprehensive information that will be collected in the proposed study. Two studies reported use of cancer screening; however, they were state specific (Oregon and California), reported receipt of a single type of screening test (cervical cancer and colorectal cancer), and used HMO and Medicaid claims data.13, 14 Two other studies examined smoking cessation services for individuals with mental illness, but only one surveyed CMHC staff.15, 16
Relevant Data Collections by Other Agencies:
AHRQ conducts an annual survey of families, individuals, medical providers, and employers (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey); topics include perceived mental health status (not diagnosis of mental illness), cancer prevalence and expense.
https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/MEPS_topics.jsp?topicid=4Z6
https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/MEPS_topics.jsp?topicid=11Z-1
HRSA’s Bureau of Primary Health Care funds and collects data from nearly 1400 health centers focused on integrating care; the data include preventive services delivered (e.g., cancer and mental health screening) and special populations (i.e., homeless, agricultural workers, public housing, school-based, and veterans).
https://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx
NIMH reports the prevalence of specific mental illnesses, disability, and suicide. The Division of Services and Intervention Research supports intervention research (e.g., evaluates pharmacological, psychosocial, and rehabilitative services) and mental health services research (e.g., clinical trials). When NIMH’s database of grants was queried for cancer prevention activities, it yielded two results (smoking cessation intervention for depressed smokers; comparison of prevention education interventions for HIV/AIDS and cancer among Latino men).
https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/organization/dsir/index.shtmlcompared
NCI – collects cancer surveillance data on different demographic groups (variables do not include diagnosis of mental illness); research areas includes cancer biology, genomics, etiology, diagnosis, prevention, early detection/screening, and treatment.
https://www.cancer.gov/research/areas/public-health
https://seer.cancer.gov/popdata/
SAMHSA – has funded more than 100 Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration (PBHCI) grants since 2009. The grants support facilities that offer different levels of primary care (e.g., tobacco cessation counseling, screening for lipids, diabetes, and obesity) and behavioral health services onsite, or refer clients to primary care providers. An evaluation study revealed that some also offer immunizations and gynecological examinations; however, no data were reported on cancer screening. A majority of clients had risk factors for cancer (current smokers, obese, diabetic). A query of the grants database for cancer prevention/screening-related projects yielded no RFAs matching the search criteria.
https://www.integration.samhsa.gov/about-us/pbhci
https://www.integration.samhsa.gov/integrated-care-models/behavioral-health-in-primary-care
https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grant-announcements-2018
5. Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities
This data collection will not involve small businesses.
6. Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently
Mental illness may be associated with behaviors such as cigarette smoking and physical inactivity that predispose individuals to an increased risk of some cancers as well as poorer cancer outcomes.17, 18 In addition, lack of continuity of primary care may increase the likelihood of late-stage diagnosis. A number of recent studies have reported success in reducing smoking and improving diet, exercise, and weight in patients with serious mental illnessa.19-23 Similar to people without disabilities, those with disabilities are more likely to be screened for cancer if they receive recommendations from their health care providers.24-26 In a recent study of enrollees in community mental health programs, lack of physician recommendations for cancer screening emerged as the main cause of low screening rates.12 Without a better understanding of the capacities of CMHCs to provide or connect their clients with cancer prevention and screening/early detection services, we lack a clear picture of barriers to cancer prevention among people with MI. The literature on interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening among this population is scarce. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials to improve screening among patients with serious MI found no trials that met the review inclusion criteria.27 Findings from the proposed study could be used to inform development of effective interventions to reduce disparities in cancer risk behaviors and screening among people with MI.
7. Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5
The request fully complies with regulation 5 CFR 1320.5.
8. Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside Agency
Part A: PUBLIC NOTICE
A 60-day Notice was published in the Federal Register on 11/08/2017 (Volume 82, Number 215, pages 51837-51838) (see APP. 2). CDC received four comments, two of which were duplicates. CDC did not provide responses to either of these comments, because they fell within the “outside of scope of project” category. The other two comments were letters from organizations (the Truth Initiative and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics), both of whom offered support for the project. The latter organization suggested enhancements to the proposed survey, which the CDC and its contractor had already addressed when the survey instruments and study methods were developed. CDC sent letters to both organizations, thanking them for their feedback. No changes to the project are required.
Part B: CONSULTATION
Consultations were conducted prior to the development of the proposed study with researchers and public health professionals experienced in the field of cancer prevention among people with mental illness.
Expert Consultants
Dennis Freeman, PhD Executive Director Cherokee Health Systems;
[email protected] ; 865-934-6734
Brian Hepburn, MD, Executive Director National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors; [email protected]; 703-739-9333
Margaret Swarbrick, PhD, Rutgers University, Director of the Wellness Institute at Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey; [email protected]; 732-768-6909
Peggy Hannon, PhD, MPH is an Associate Professor at the University of Washington
School of Public Health and Director of the University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center (one of CDC’s Prevention Research Centers); [email protected]; 206-616-7859
Ron Manderscheid, PhD is Executive Director of the National Association of County
Behavioral Heath Directors and formerly Chief of the Surveys and Reports Branch at
SAMHSA; [email protected]; 202-942-4296
9. Explanation of Any Payment or Gift to Respondents
Respondents will not receive payments or gifts for providing information.
10. Protection of the Privacy and Confidentiality of Information Provided by Respondents
CDC’s Information Systems Security Officer has reviewed this submission, and has determined that the Privacy Act does not apply. While the Privacy Act is not applicable, given the sensitivity of the information collected, all appropriate security controls and rules of behavior will be incorporated to protect the confidentiality of information obtained. Personally identifying information (PII) will not be transmitted to CDC. CDC will only include aggregate and summary information in reports and will not include information that may identify respondents.
Privacy will be maintained to the extent allowable by law. The contractor complies with the Privacy Act of 1974 (HIPAA) and the E-Government Act of 2002, including Title III: Federal Information Security Management Act, which covers site security, security control documentation, access control, change management, incident response, and risk management. The contractor has developed an Information System Security Plan and completed the Certification and Accreditation process with multiple Federal agencies to receive authorization to operate in their enterprise environments. In addition, the contractor has received authorizations to operate “low-to-moderate” risk category information systems in other environments. The contractor has also established an internal audit program to regularly review their information security program.
The contractor configures their computers with the applicable United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) and ensures that they have and maintain the latest operating system patch level and anti-virus software level. Full disk encryption software has been implemented to protect the storage of data, as well as file transfer software for the secure, encrypted transmission of sensitive data to and from clients and subcontractors. The contractor has also implemented ASA Firewalls for boundary protection.
The contractor’s web survey tool allows the integration of all survey consent information, including OMB and IRB information. Instructions for the survey and consent language will be embedded into the online survey as well as available in separate documents through hyperlinks in the introductory email. For the online survey, consent will be implied. For the telephone interviews, consent language will be included in the survey advance letter. Consent language will include but not be limited to the purpose of the survey, risks and benefits of participation, who will see the information collected, and how any personally identifiable information (PII) will be used.
11. Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Justification for Sensitive Questions
IRB Approval
The contractor’s IRB has determined that the study protocol is exempt from IRB review per 45CFR46.101(b)(2) (see APP. 3). The survey includes questions that assess CMHC psychiatric clinicians’ and administrators’ perceptions about the capacities of the facilities where they work to provide cancer prevention and screening services to clients, as well as barriers to providing these services. To delve more deeply into the topics addressed in the survey, a subsample of respondents will be interviewed by telephone. All participants will be notified that participation is voluntary, any PII collected will be removed after data collection is complete, and individual survey and interview respondents will not be identified by name in any reports.
Sensitive Questions
The survey questions will assess the capacities of participating CMHCs to provide cancer preventive services, not clinical information about individual clients. Respondents will be notified that their participation is voluntary and their names will not be revealed in any reports. Findings from the study will be presented in aggregate and not as individual responses. Copies of the clinician and administrator survey instruments (APP. 4), clinician and administrator interview guides (APP. 5), recruitment and reminder materials (APP. 6), survey web pages (APP. 7), consent materials (APP. 8), and clinician and administrator pilot feedback forms are attached (APP. 9).
12. Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
A. Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
Table A.12-1 displays the estimated annualized burden hours for this data collection. To calculate the total burden, we estimated 500 respondents for the surveys and 50 for the interviews, multiplied by one response per respondent, multiplied by the average burden per response. The average burden varied from 15-20 minutes for the surveys and an hour for the interviews.
Table A.12-1. Estimated Annualized Burden to Respondents
Type of Respondents |
Form Name |
No. of Respondents |
No. of Responses per Respondent |
Avg. Burden per Response (in hrs.) |
Total Burden (in hrs.) |
|
Psychiatrists Psychiatric nurse practitioners Psychologists Registered nurses Physicians’ assistants Licensed certified social workers Licensed independent clinical social workers Licensed mental health counselors
|
Clinician Survey Instrument |
500 |
1 |
15/60 |
125 |
|
Administrators |
Administrator Survey Instrument |
500 |
1 |
20/60 |
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psychiatrists Psychiatric nurse practitioners Psychologists Registered nurses Physicians’ assistants Licensed certified social workers Licensed independent clinical social workers Licensed mental health counselors
|
Clinician Interviews |
50 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
|
Administrators |
Administrator Interviews |
50 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
|
|
Total |
392 |
||||
Table B.12-1 displays the estimated annualized cost to respondents for reporting program progress information.
Table B.12-1. Estimated Annualized Cost to Respondents
Type of Respondents |
Form Name |
No. of Respondents |
Total Burden (in hrs.) |
Average Hourly Wage1 |
Total Cost |
Psychiatrists Psychiatric nurse practitioners Psychologists Registered nurses Physicians’ assistants Licensed certified social workers Licensed independent clinical social workers Licensed mental health counselors
|
Clinician survey |
500 |
125 |
$87.82
|
$10,977.50 |
Administrators |
Administrator survey |
500 |
167 |
$50.99 |
$8,515.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psychiatrists Psychiatric nurse practitioners Psychologists Registered nurses Physicians’ assistants Licensed certified social workers Licensed independent clinical social workers Licensed mental health counselors
|
Clinician interview |
50 |
50 |
$87.82 |
$4,391.00 |
Administrators |
Administrator interview |
50 |
50 |
$50.99 |
$2,549.50 |
|
Total |
$26,433.33 |
|||
13. Estimates of Other Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents and Record Keepers
The contractor will use their own survey software system for data collection and monitoring of survey completion. No capital or maintenance costs will be required. Additionally, there will be no start-up, hardware or software costs.
14. Estimates of Annualized Cost to the Federal Government
Table A.14.1 provides a detailed breakdowns of the estimated annualized cost to the government.
Table A.14.1 Estimated Annualized Cost for Data Collection
Expense Type |
|
|
Contractor and other expenses (Funding contract #: 200-2014-61267) |
Salary/wages, supplies/materials, and other contractual services (Abt Associates) |
$284,336 |
|
|
|
Total annualized cost to the government |
|
$284,336 |
Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments
This is a new data collection.
16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule
A. Time schedule for the entire project
Data collection will commence within one week of OMB approval and be conducted over a 3-month period.
Table 16-1 Deliverable Description |
||
Task # |
Task |
Time Schedule |
2 |
Develop online survey instrument |
1/31/2017 |
3 |
Prepare survey materials |
12/29/2016 |
4 |
Develop draft and final study protocols |
12/29/2016, 1/31/2017 |
5 |
IRB and OMB approvals
|
Within one week of approval of completion of the final survey instrument, survey materials, and study protocol Within one week of IRB approval |
6 |
Pilot test survey instrument and telephone interview guides with 9 respondents |
Within 4 weeks of all IRB approvals |
7 |
Implement online survey and telephone interviews
|
Within one week of OMB approval 5/30/2018 |
8 |
Develop and submit dissemination plan |
3/30/2018 |
9 |
Draft and submit final report |
8/29/2018, 9/29/2018 |
B. Publication Plan
Strategies to disseminate the study findings may include peer-review publications, meetings/ conferences, and social media.
C. Analysis Plan
Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses will be conducted. All information will be aggregated and reported with no program identifiers present in external documents.
17. Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate
The display of the OMB expiration date is not inappropriate for this data collection.
18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
There are no exceptions to the certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.
References
1. The National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/.
2. Kisely S, Crowe E, Lawrence D. Cancer-related mortality in people with mental illness. JAMA Pscyh. 2013;70(2):209-217.
3. Tran E, Rouillon F, Loze J-Y, et al. Cancer mortality in patients with schizophrenia. Cancer 2009;115:3555-3562.
4. Gfroerer J, Dube SR, King BA, Garrett BE, Babb S, McAfee T; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥18 years with mental illness—United States. 2009-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(5):81-87.
5. LeCook B, Wayne GF, Kafali EN, Liu Z, Shu C, Flores M. Trends in smoking among adults with mental illness and association between mental health treatment and smoking cessation. JAMA. 2014;311(2):172-182.
6. Aggarwal A, Pandurangi A, Smith W. Disparities in breast and cervical cancer screening in women with mental illness: a systematic literature review. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):392-398.
7. Abrams MT, Myers CS, Feldman SM. Cervical cancer screening and acute care visits among Medicaid enrollees with mental and substance use disorders. Psych Services. 2012;63(8):815-822.
8. Druss BG, Marcus SC, Campbell J, et al. Medical services for clients in community mental health centers: results from a national survey. Psych Serv. 2008;59(8):917-920.
9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings, NSDUH Series H-47, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 13-4805. Rockville, MD. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2013.
10. Shim RS, Lally C, Farley R, Ingoglia C, Druss BG. Medical care services in community mental health centers: a national survey of psychiatrists. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2015;42(3):395-400.
11. Druss BG, von Esenwein SA, Glick GE, et al. Randomized trial of an integrated behavioral health home: the Health Outcomes Management and Evaluation (HOME) Study. Am J Psychiatry in Advance. 2016 (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050507).
12. Rockson LE, MA Swarbrick. Cancer screening among peer-led wellness center enrollees. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2016;54:36-40.
13. James M, Thomas M, Frolov L, et al. Rates of cervical cancer screening among women with severe mental illness in the public health system. Psychiatric Services 2017;68:839-842.
14. Yarborough BH, Hanson GC, Perrin NA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening completion among individuals with and without mental illnesses: a comparison of 2 screening methods. Am J Health Promotion 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117116686573.
15. Das S, Prochaska JJ. Innovative approaches to support smoking cessation for individuals with mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Expert Rev Respir Med 2017;11:841-850.
16. Chen LS, Baker T, Brownson RC, et al. Smoking cessation and electronic cigarettes in community mental health centers: patients and provider perspectives. Community Ment Health 2017;53:695-702.
17. Irwin KE, Henderson DC, Knight HP, Pirl WF. Cancer care for individuals with schizophrenia. Cancer. 2014;120:323-334.
18. Howard L, Barley E, Davies E, et al. Cancer diagnosis in people with severe mental illness: practical and ethical issues. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):797-804.
19. Tsoi DT, Porwal M, Webster AC. Interventions for smoking cessation and reduction in individuals with schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2013;
20. Bartels SJ, Pratt SI, Aschbrenner KA, Barre LK, Naslund JA, Wolfe R, et al. Pragmatic replication trial of health promotion coaching for obesity in serious mental illness and maintenance of outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(4):344-352.
21. Bartels SJ, Pratt SI, Aschbrenner KA, Barre LK, Jue K, Wolfe RS, et al. Clinically significant improved fitness and weight loss among overweight persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64(8):729-736.
22. Green CA, Yarborough BJ, Leo MC, Yarborough MT, Stumbo SP, Janoff SL, et al. The STRIDE weight loss and lifestyle intervention for individuals taking antipsychotic medications: a randomized trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(1):71-81.
23. Daumit GL, Dickerson FB, Wang NY, Dalcin A, Jerome GJ, Anderson CA, et al. A behavioral weight-loss intervention in persons with serious mental illness. N Engl Med. 2013;368(17):1594-1602.
24. Yankaskas BC, Dickens P, Bowling JM, Jarman MP, Luken K, Salisbury K, et al. Barriers to adherence to screening mammography among women with disabilities. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(5):947-953.
25. Ramirez A, Farmer GC, Grant D, Papachristou T. Disability and preventive cancer screening: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(11):2057-2064.
26. Steele CB, Townsend JS, Courtney-Young EA, Young M. Cancer screening prevalence among adults with disabilities, United States, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:160312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.160312.
27. Barley EA, Borschmann RD, Walters P, Tylee A. Interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD009641. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009641.pub3.
1 Hourly wage information is from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics website (www.data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/print.pl/oes/current/oes_nat.htm).
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2021-01-21 |