2018 End-to-End Census Test Service-Based Enumeration Study Plan Version 1.3 “Pre-decisional Document”
|
For PMGB last review after incorporating DSSD & DROM comments, updates ESC decision |
Study Plan for the 2018 End-to-End Census Test Service-Based Enumeration Operational Assessment
Group Quarters Operations Integrated Project Team
Draft Pending Final Census Bureau Executive Review and Clearance.
(Final Draft) |
|
|
November 21, 2017 Version 1.3
|
Page intentionally left blank
Table of Contents
I. Introduction 4
II. Background 4
III. Methodology 5
IV. Assumptions 8
V. Questions To Be Answered 8
VII. Risks and Limitations 14
VI. Measures of Success 14
VIII. Internal Systems Flow and Data Requirements 15
IX. Division Responsibilities 16
X. Milestone Schedule 16
XI. Review /Approval Table 19
XII. Document Revision and Version Control History 20
XIII. Glossary of Acronyms 20
XIV. References 21
The 2018 End-to-End Census Test is an important opportunity for the Census Bureau to ensure an accurate count of the nation’s increasingly diverse and rapidly growing population. It is the first opportunity to apply much of what has been learned from census tests conducted throughout the decade in preparation for the nation’s once-a-decade population census. The 2018 End-to-End Census Test will be held in Providence, Rhode Island.
The 2018 End-to-End Census Test will test and validate the 2020 Census operations, procedures, systems, and field infrastructure to ensure proper integration and conformance with functional and non-functional requirements. The test will also produce a prototype of geographic and data products, and will validate the 2020 Census design and cost estimate. Note that the 2018 End-to-End Census Test results are based on three sites that were purposely selected and cannot be generalized to the entire United States. Additionally, because it is not conducted in a “full decennial census environment,” the results may not foreshadow what will occur in the 2020 Census.
The purpose of the Service-Based Enumeration (SBE) is to provide an opportunity for people without conventional housing and people experiencing homelessness to be included in the census by enumerating them at places where they receive services and at pre-identified outdoor locations. For the 2018 End-to-End Census Test, the SBE will be a three-day operation that will occur July 25 through July 27, 2018 in the Providence test site. This study plan documents how the 2018 End-to-End Census Test SBE will be assessed, as guided by questions to be answered.
Emergency and transitional shelters with sleeping facilities for people experiencing homelessness, which includes shelters for children who are runaways, neglected, or experiencing homelessness (Shelters)
Soup Kitchens
Regularly Scheduled Mobile Food Vans (Mobile Food Vans)
Targeted Non-Sheltered Outdoor Locations (TNSOLs)
Creating the Service-Based Enumeration Address Universe – The initial GQ universe of service-based addresses and Targeted Non-Sheltered Outdoor Locations (TNSOLs) will be from the 2010 Census universe including any address updates from other operations as of January 2018. The 2018 GQ address universe will be sent to the Group Quarters Advance Contact operation.
Group Quarters Advance Contact (GQAC) – The intent of this operation is to prepare the GQ administrator and the field staff for the upcoming SBE operation. Clerks in the Providence Area Census Office (ACO) will conduct interviews by calling the SBE facility using the phone number on file. Using a paper calling script, unique to the type of SBE facility being contacted, clerks will:
Verify or update the GQ name, address, and the GQ contact person’s information.
.
Collect information to assist enumerators in conducting the upcoming SBE such as:
Schedule a date and time for the Census Bureau to conduct the enumeration.
Collect the expected population at the time of enumeration.
Determine if the GQ serves females only, males only, or both.
Address any security, privacy or confidentially concerns.
Identify the preferred method of enumeration at shelters.
During GQAC, GQ administrators at shelters are asked to select one of two enumeration methods:
In-Person Interviews - Field staff will conduct in-person interviews to collect name, sex, age on Census Day, date of birth, race, ethnicity, and an alternate address where they live or stay when not at the shelter.
Paper-Response Data Collection - Field staff will meet with the GQ contact person to obtain a paper listing that contains name, sex, age, date of birth, race, ethnicity and an alternate address where they live or stay when not at the shelter for each resident who was staying there on the day of enumeration.
Offering shelters an option to provide paper administrative records to enumerate their residents will reduce respondent burden. People at soup kitchens and mobile food vans will be enumerated by in-person interviews only.
During GQAC, office staff will use a web-based application called the Product Control System (PCS) to enter and update the service-based GQ information. Service-based GQs that are unverifiable through in-office methodologies are moved into the field workflow for verification during SBE.
After GQAC has been completed by the ACO, the SBE universe file containing the verified and updated address information will be delivered.
The ACO Census Field Manager (CFM) will check out cases to the Census Field Supervisor (CFS) for enumeration.
The CFS will assign individual enumerators or a team of enumerators to cases.
Enumerators will conduct in-person interviews using the paper ICQs at soup kitchens, mobile food vans, and shelters where the GQ contact person selected in-person interviews as their preferred method of enumeration.
For those shelters that selected paper-response data collection, the enumerator will meet with the GQ contact person to pick up the paper listing for review and further processing. As long as the name (concatenated first, middle and last name) has at least three valid characters, the person record has sufficient data to be counted in the census.
Enumerators will turn in the ICQs, paper listings, and enumeration records1 to the CFS.
The CFS will deliver the ICQs, paper listings, and enumeration records to the ACO.
ACO clerks will review and check in the ICQs, paper listings and enumeration records. Clerks must review these forms for completeness and accuracy before checking them in. Following the instructions on the Group Quarters Quality Control Office Review Checklist, clerks must make sure that:
All ICQs have the GQ Control Number label affixed or written on the back of the form.
The number of ICQs received for the GQ matches the number written on the Enumeration Record.
The date the enumeration was completed or the ICQs were picked up has been filled in on the Enumeration Record.
If the number of ICQs is “0” or the GQ has incomplete ICQs, then there is documentation explaining the reason in the comments section of the Enumeration Record.
If the number of ICQs is “0” then the appropriate box is marked in the “For Supervisory Use Only” section on the Enumeration Record.
The ACO will ship the corrected ICQs, paper listings, and enumeration records to the National Processing Center (NPC) for data capture and processing.
The following are SBE assumptions for the 2018 End-to-End Census Test:
The Individual Census Questionnaire (ICQ) will be administered as specified to individuals at shelters that choose in-person interviews, soup kitchens, mobile food vans and TNSOLs.
GQ administrators at shelters who chose paper-response data collection will provide sufficient information for enumeration.
Respondent data from the ICQ and paper-response data collection will be data captured as specified in the Decennial Response Processing Operation specifications.
Cost and Progress reports will be maintained for the SBE Operation.
Data required for the assessment will be gathered on time, as specified, and delivered to the appropriate divisions as stated in the data requirements.
The 2018 Census Test SBE Assessment will focus on several components of enumerating the population at shelters, soup kitchens, mobile food vans and TNSOLs. We will report the number and type of SBE locations visited, and the number of data-captured 2 persons by service type, as well as document the differences between the population count and the expected population count by service type. In addition to these results, we will assess how successful the SBE operation was in collecting demographic data for SBE people by examining the number of data items provided by respondents and the item nonresponse rates. The 2018 End-to-End Census Test SBE Assessment will also include variance analysis on schedule and budget, production and training workloads, field staffing workloads, enumerator debriefings and lessons learned from the Group Quarters Operations-Integrated Project Team (GQO-IPT).
Note: We may need to revise, update, or remove questions or tables for the assessment report to reflect the information that is actually available from the data collected during the 2018 End-to-End Census Test SBE. Where appropriate, we will break out data for shelters by enumeration method (i.e., in-person interview and paper-response data collection).
How many service-based GQs were visited? How many SBE locations were visited that had no persons to enumerate?
This table will provide the number of SBE locations visited, the number with at least one data-captured person, the number of SBE locations with no population and SBE locations visited that were unknown, unable to be located or were deemed dangerous
Table 1. Service-Based GQs Visited During 2018 Census Test SBE |
||||||||
Service-Based GQ Type |
Total Locations in the SBE Workload |
Locations with at Least One Data-Captured Person |
Locations with No Data Captured Persons (Zero Population) |
Locations Unknown, Unable to Locate, or Deemed Dangerous |
||||
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
|
Shelters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soup Kitchens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Food Vans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TNSOLs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How many people were counted at SBE GQs? How do the counts compare to the expected population counts reported by the GQAC operation by service type?
Table 2 shows the number of service-based GQs with population count differences less than or equal to ten, ten or more, and no differences between the actual population count from the Census Unedited File (CUF) and the expected population count from the GQAC operation. TNSOLs are out of scope during GQAC.
Table 2. Number of Service-Based GQs with Population Count Differences between the Actual Population and the Expected Population by Service Type |
||||||||
Comparison Categories Between Actual and Expected Population Counts Number of GQs With: |
Total |
Shelters |
Soup Kitchens |
Mobile Food Vans |
||||
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
|
No Difference In Population Counts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population Difference 10 or Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population Difference Greater than 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero or Missing Expected Population Count |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is the distribution of shelters and persons enumerated by enumeration method?
During GQAC operation, the GQ contact person at shelters can choose one of two enumeration methods: In-Person Interviews or Paper-Response Data Collection. Table 3 will show the number of shelters and the number of persons enumerated at shelters by type of enumeration method.
Table 3. Distribution of Shelters and Persons at Shelters by Type of Enumeration Method |
||||
Type of Enumeration Method |
Number of Shelters |
Number of Persons |
||
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
|
In-Person Interviews |
|
|
|
|
Paper-Response Data Collection |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
How were the ICQs completed during in-person interviews?
Table 4 will provide the results of how data captured ICQs were completed. Forms may be filled out by the respondent, the GQ administrator, population count observation (allowed for TNSOLs only), or other means. Enumerators will indicate how the ICQ was filled out by marking the appropriate box to the “Answered by” question on the back of the ICQ.
If the “Respondent” box was marked, it indicated that the respondent filled out the ICQ themselves or the enumerator filled it out via an interview with the respondent.
If the “Group Quarters Administrator” box was marked, it indicated that the GQ Administrator used their administrative records or had enough knowledge to help the enumerator to complete the form.
The “Observation” box is for TNSOLs only. If the “Observation” box was marked, it indicated that this person was included in the population count even though the enumerator could not obtain a name or any demographic characteristics through an in-person interview. For the 2018 End-to-End Census Test SBE, enumerators are not allowed to fill in the demographic information by observation.
If the “Other” box was marked, it indicated that the form was completed by other means, such as another GQ resident.
If the “Answered by” question is blank or more than one box is checked, the responses will be tabulated as blank or invalid responses.
Table 4. How Service-Based ICQs Were Completed by Service Type |
||||||||||||
Service-Based GQ Type |
Total ICQs |
Respondent |
Group Quarters Administrator |
Population Count by Observation (TNSOLs only) |
Other |
Blank or Invalid Response |
||||||
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
|
Shelters (In Person Interviews only) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
|
Soup Kitchens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
|
Mobile Food Vans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
NA |
|
|
|
|
TNSOLs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA – Not Applicable for these SBE GQ types. Enumerators are allowed to collect a population count by observation at TNSOLs only. |
How many data items (name and demographic characteristics) did people provide by service type?
We will calculate the number of persons who provided one, two, three, or four data items by service type. The four data items are name, sex, age on Census Day or year of birth, and race or ethnicity.
Table 5. Number and Percent of Data Items People Provided by Service Type |
||||||||||
Service-Based GQ Type |
Total |
One |
Two |
Three |
Four |
|||||
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
|
Shelters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-Person Interviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper-Response Data Collection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soup Kitchens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Food Vans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TNSOLs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What was the item nonresponse rate for name and demographic items by service type? For shelters, what was the item nonresponse rate by type of enumeration method?
Table 6 will show the rate of item nonresponse for each of the data items by service type and for shelters by type of enumeration method. The rate of item nonresponse is the number of persons with a missing response for the particular data item on the ICQ, divided by the total number of persons counted at the SBE GQ. This number will be converted to a percent, which represents the item nonresponse rate.
Table 6. Data Item Nonresponse Rates by Service Type |
||||||||||
Service-Based GQ Type |
Total |
Name |
Sex |
Age or Year of Birth |
Race or Ethnicity |
|||||
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
|
Shelters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-Person Interviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper-Response Data Collection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soup Kitchens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Food Vans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TNSOLs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How many persons at soup kitchens and mobile food vans reported an alternate address of a place where they live or stay?
This table will show the number of ICQs that contain an alternate address for persons enumerated at soup kitchens and mobile food vans, and the number of addresses that had sufficient information to geocode at a minimum to a county and state during the Non-ID Processing operations.3
Table 7. Persons at Soup Kitchens and Mobile Food Vans with Alternate Addresses |
||||||
Alternate Addresses Provided by Persons at Soup Kitchens and Mobile Food Vans |
Total |
Soup Kitchens |
Mobile Food Vans |
|||
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
Count |
Percent |
|
Total Persons that Provided an Alternate Address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate addresses with sufficient information to geocode |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate addresses with insufficient information to geocode |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Persons that did not Provide an Alternate Address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SBE Persons at Soup Kitchens and Mobile Food Vans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What were the operational expenses to conduct the 2018 End-to-End Census Test SBE?
Table 8. Service-Based Enumeration Operational Expenses |
||||
Component |
Budget |
Costs |
% of Total Budget Used |
Variance |
Production Total |
|
|
|
|
What were the schedule variances in conducting training and production in the 2018 End-to-End Census Test SBE?
Table 9. Service-Based Enumeration Schedule Variances |
||||
Activity |
Planned Finish |
Actual Finish |
% Difference |
Variance |
Training |
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
What were the training staff authorizations?
Table 10. Service-Based Enumeration Training Staff Authorizations |
||||
Employee Type |
DCMD Cost Model Training Staff (with Frontloading) |
FLD Staffing Authorization (with Frontloading) |
% of Total Budget Used |
Variance |
Trained Staff |
|
|
|
|
What was the Area Census Office staffing by employee type?
Table 11. Area Census Office Staffing by Employee Type |
||||
Employee Type |
DCMD Cost Model Training Staff (with Frontloading) |
FLD Staffing Authorization (with Frontloading) |
Staff invited to Training as of 7/27/2018 |
Working Staff as of 7/29/2018 |
Census Field Managers (CFM) |
|
|
|
|
Census Field Supervisors (CFS) |
|
|
|
|
Enumerators |
|
|
|
|
Total Field Staff |
|
|
|
|
What were the key lessons learned that can inform the SBE operation in the 2020 Census?
During a series of debriefings with the NPC staff and Field staff, the GQO-IPT will discuss and identify key lessons learned for improving operational processes for the 2020 Census SBE. Some debriefing questions to include:
Was staffing adequate? What challenges or issues were noted during in-person visits?
Were there any advantages or disadvantages enumerating SBE GQs at the end of July instead of the end of March?
What issues were noted during review and check-in of ICQs? Were there any ICQs not linked to a GQ? If so, what steps were taken to link the person data on the ICQ to the appropriate GQ?
Actual budget may exceed the planned budget to support the project.
Competing and limited personnel resources assigned to research, develop, and author the SBE Assessment Report are also the same resources for two other critical GQ assessment reports.
We will assess the quality of the results by calculating and comparing the item nonresponse rates and the number of demographic data items (including full name) collected during the 2018 Census Test SBE to prior SBE censuses and tests.
If the item nonresponse rates are lower than or about the same as the rates in prior censuses or tests, then the quality of the data is acceptable.
If the number of demographic data items collected is higher than or about the same as the number of data items collected in prior censuses or tests, than the quality of the data is acceptable.
We will also assess the costs and progress reports from this test and compare the variances on schedule and budget to the corresponding variances from previous SBE censuses and tests.
If the budget variances are lower than or about the same as the variances in prior censuses or tests, then the costs are reasonable.
If the operational schedule variances are lower than or about the same as the variances in prior censuses or tests, then the schedule is on target.
This section describes an overview of the internal system flow to obtain data to assess the SBE operation.
The Master Address File/Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing Database (MAF/TIGER) system creates and delivers the Group Quarters universe in a MAF Extract, which includes both SBE and non-SBE GQ information.
The GQ MAF Extract is delivered to the Control and Response Data System (CaRDS).
CaRDS creates and sends the Sample Delivery File (SDF) to DSSD for review and validation. The SDF identifies the universe for enumeration, mailing letters and promotional material.
After DSSD validates the universe, CaRDS sends the SDF to the Survey Operational Control System (SOCS) in the Enterprise Census and Survey Enabling-Operational Control System (ECaSE-OCS). ECaSE-OCS manages the data collection, captures the response data from ICQs, and receive status updates and maintains workloads as data collection proceeds.
After the field work is conducted, the NPC will use the Automated Tracking and Control System (ATAC) to check in the boxes received and send events to Field OCS. NPC staff sends the ICQs to the Integrated Computer Assisted Data Entry (iCADE).
The iCADE system will capture respondent information from scanned paper ICQs and sends response and event data to SOCS.
Using the linkage file received from Field Operational Control System (FOCS), ICQs will be linked to the GQ IDs in SOCS.
This data will be put into the Census Data Lake (CDL), a data repository that interfaces with the Unified Tracking System (UTS).
The Unified Tracking System (UTS) is a data warehouse that combines a variety of census systems, bringing the data to one place where users can run or create reports for analysis. The UTS will extract and format the selected data for delivery to the Decennial Response Processing Systems (DRPS) to use in creating the Decennial Response File.
Below indicates participating divisions and responsibilities for the analysis of data from the 2018 Census End-to-End Test SBE.
Division |
Division Members |
Description of Responsibilities |
DCMD |
Dora Durante
Belkines Arenas-Germosen
GQO IPT |
the analysis report
|
DSSD |
Diane F. Barrett |
|
DITD |
Gerard Moore
|
|
FLD |
Census Field Manager (CFM)
Census Field Supervisors (CFS)
Enumerators |
|
Below are the standard schedule activities for the development of the research study plan and report. Definitions of acronyms are noted in the glossary section. Dates for the operational assessment report are to be determined.
Activity ID |
Activity Name |
Orig Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Service-Based
Enumeration Assessment Study Plan |
||||
First Draft |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare
First Draft of <<Title>> Study Plan |
|
|
|
|
Distribute
First Draft of SBE Assessment Study Plan
Study
Plan to the Assessment Sponsoring DCMD ADC and Other Reviewers |
|
|
Jan-27-17A
|
|
Incorporate
DCMD ADC and Other Comments to <<Title>> Study
Plan |
|
|
Feb-21-17A |
Initial Draft |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare
Initial Draft <<Title>> Study Plan |
|
|
Jun-16-17A
|
|
Distribute
Initial Draft Study Plan to Evaluations & Experiments
Coordination Brach (EXC) |
|
|
Jun-16-17A |
|
EXC
Distributes Initial Draft <<Title>> Study Plan to the
DROM Working Group for Electronic Review |
|
|
Jun-27-17A |
|
Receive
Comments from the DROM Working Group on the Initial Draft
SBE
Assessment Study Plan
|
|
|
Nov-7-17A |
|
Schedule the Draft SBE Assessment Study Plan for the IPT Lead to Meet with the DROM Working Group
|
|
|
|
|
Discuss
& Incorporated DROM Comments on Initial Draft SBE Assessment
Study Plan |
|
|
Nov-20-17A |
Final Draft |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare
Final Draft of Study Plan |
|
|
Nov-20-17A |
|
Distribute
Final Draft SBE Assessment Study Plan to the DPMO and the EXC |
|
|
|
|
Schedule
and Discuss Final Draft SBE Assessment Study Plan with the 2020
PMGB |
|
|
Nov-29-17A |
|
Incorporate
2020 PMGB Comments for Draft SBE Assessment Study Plan |
|
|
|
|
Prepare
FINAL Draft SBE Assessment Study Plan Study Plan |
|
|
|
|
Distribute
FINAL Draft SBE Assessment Study Plan to the EXC |
|
|
|
|
EXC Staff Distributes the Draft SBE Assessment Study Plan and 2020 Memorandum to the DCCO
|
|
|
|
|
DCCO Staff Process the Draft 2020 Memorandum and the SBE Assessment Study Plan to Obtain Clearances (DCMD Chief, Assistant Director, and Associate Director)
|
|
|
|
|
DCCO
Staff Formally Release the SBE Assessment Study Plan in the 2020
Memorandum Series |
|
|
|
SBE
Assessment
Report |
||||
First Draft of SBE Assessment Report |
||||
|
||||
|
Receive, Verify, and Validate SBE Data
|
|
|
|
|
Examine Results and Conduct Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare First Draft of the SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
|
Distribute First Draft of <<Title>> Report to the Assessment Sponsoring DCMD ADC and Other Reviewers
|
|
|
Dec-29-2018 |
|
Incorporate DCMD ADC and Other Comments to the SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
Initial Draft of SBE Assessment Report |
||||
|
Prepare Initial Draft of the SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
|
Distribute Initial Draft of the SBE Assessment Report to Evaluations & Experiments Coordination Br. (EXC)
|
|
|
|
|
EXC Distributes Initial Draft of the SBE Assessment Report to the DROM Working Group for Electronic Review
|
|
|
|
|
Receive Comments from the DROM Working Group on the Initial Draft of the SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule the SBE Assessment Report for the IPT Lead to Meet with the DROM Working Group
|
|
|
|
|
Discuss DROM Comments on Initial Draft of the SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
Final Draft of SBE Assessment Report |
||||
|
Prepare Final Draft of the SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
|
Distribute Final Draft of the SBE Assessment Report to the DPMO and the EXC
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule and Discuss Final Draft of the SBE Assessment Report with the 2020 PMGB
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporate 2020 PMGB Comments on the SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
Final of SBE Assessment Report |
||||
|
Prepare FINAL SBE Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
|
Deliver FINAL SBE Assessment Report to the EXC
|
|
|
|
|
EXC Staff Distribute the FINAL SBE Assessment Report and 2020 Memorandum to the DCCO
|
|
|
|
|
DCCO Staff Process the Draft 2020 Memorandum and the FINAL SBE Assessment Report to Obtain Clearances (DCMD Chief, Assistant Director, and Associate Director)
|
|
|
|
|
DCCO
Staff Formally Release the FINAL SBE Assessment Report in the
2020 Memorandum Series |
|
|
|
|
EXC
Staff Capture Recommendations of the FINAL SBE Assessment Report
in the Census Knowledge Management SharePoint Application |
|
|
|
Role |
Electronic Signature |
Date |
Fact Checker or independent verifier |
|
|
Author’s Division Chief (or designee) |
|
|
DSSD ADC |
|
|
DCMD ADC |
|
|
DROM DCMD co-executive sponsor (or designee) |
|
|
DROM DSSD co-executive sponsor (or designee) |
|
|
Associate Director for R&M (or designee) |
|
|
Associate Director for Decennial Census Programs (or designee) |
|
|
2020 PMGB |
|
|
Acronym |
Definition |
ACO |
Area Census Office |
DCMD |
Decennial Census Management Division |
DITD |
Decennial Information Technology Division |
DSSD |
Decennial Statistical Studies Division |
EXC |
Evaluations and Experiments Branch |
GEO |
Geography Division |
GQ |
Group Quarters |
GQAC |
Group Quarters Advance Contact |
GQE |
Group Quarters Enumeration |
GQAV |
Group Quarters Advance Visit |
GQV |
Group Quarters Validation |
MAF |
Master Address File |
SBE |
Service-Based Enumeration |
Barrett, D. F., Williams, J and Williams, A. (2013), “2010 Census Group Quarters Validation Operation Assessment Report,” 2010 Census Planning Memorandum Series, No. 193 (Reissue), January 8, 2013.
Barrett, D. F., Williams, J, Williams, A, DeVos, B, and Russell, D. (2013), “2010 Census Group Quarters Enumeration Assessment Report,” 2010 Census Planning Memorandum Series, No. 243 (Reissue), January 29, 2013.
Barrett, D. F., and Russell, D. (2013), “2010 Census Service-Based Enumeration Assessment Report,” 2010 Census Planning Memorandum Series, No. 250, January 3, 2013.
Barrett, D. F. (2017) “2020 Research and Testing: Analysis Report - 2016 Service-Based Enumeration Census Test,” July 24, 2017.
1 Enumeration Record (FORM D-352.1) – An Enumeration Record will be created for each SBE GQ by GQ type. This form contains updated information that was collected during GQAC including the updated GQ name, address, contact person information and the SBE appointment date for enumeration. This information is necessary for the ACO to prepare for the enumeration.
2 Data-captured - Data from ICQs that were scanned, keyed from paper, and linked to a GQ will be processed and stored on the Decennial Response File (DRF). Any ICQs that were lost or not linked to a GQ are examples of person records not data-captured.
3 The 2018 Census Non-ID Processing operations receive respondent-provided address information from questionnaires without a pre-identified census identification number (Census ID). These addresses become Non-ID cases and go through a series of steps in an attempt to assign a Census ID and geographic codes.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | 2018 E2E CT Operational Assessment - Service-Based Enumeration |
Author | Joyceann |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-21 |