The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has published final revisions to the definition of
solid waste that exclude certain hazardous secondary materials from
regulation under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended. Specifically, EPA has amended 40
CFR Part 261 to provide that hazardous secondary materials
reclaimed under the control of the generator are not solid wastes
if specified conditions are met. EPA has also amended Part 261 to
provide that hazardous secondary materials that are generated and
then sent to a RCRA permitted facility or verified recycler for the
purpose of reclamation are not solid waste, provided that specified
conditions are met. In addition, EPA has amended Part 261 to
provide that certain high value solvents are not solid waste when
reclaimed, provided that specified conditions are met. Finally, EPA
has finalized other amendments related to variances from solid
waste and non-waste determinations in Part 260 and has applied the
definition of legitimate recycling in 40 CFR part 260.43 to all
hazardous secondary materials recycling.
In 2015, EPA issued a
final rule that revised the RCRA Definition of Solid Waste. In that
rule, EPA replaced the 2008 transfer-based exclusion found at 40
CFR 261.4(a)(24) and (25) with the verified recycler exclusion,
found at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(24). The goal of the 2008 and 2015 rules
was to exempt hazardous secondary materials sent to off-site
recycling facilities from the definition of solid waste when
certain conditions were met. These conditions included
recordkeeping and reporting requirements. EPA also revised the
definition of legitimate recycling found at 40 CFR 260.43, which
was originally promulgated in 2008. In the 2008 and 2015 versions
of the regulation, the legitimacy provision was designed to
distinguish between real recycling activities—legitimate
recycling—and sham recycling, an activity undertaken by an entity
to avoid the requirements of managing a hazardous secondary
material as a hazardous waste. On July 7, 2014 and amended on March
6, 2018 the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit: (1) vacated the 2015 verified recycler exclusion
for hazardous waste that is recycled off-site (except for certain
provisions); (2) reinstated the transfer-based exclusion from the
2008 rule to replace the now-vacated 2015 verified recycler
exclusion; (3) upheld the containment and emergency preparedness
provisions and the eligibility of spent petroleum catalysts for the
reinstated transfer-based exclusion; (4) vacated factor 4 of the
2015 definition of legitimate recycling in its entirety; and (5)
reinstated the 2008 version of factor 4 to replace the now-vacated
2015 version of factor 4. The court issued the mandate for its
decision on March 14, 2018, at which point the orders became
effective. As a result, some of the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements under this ICR no longer apply, while other
requirements that had previously applied were reinstated.
US Code:
42 USC 6921-6924 Name of Law: Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976
The decrease in burden is a
result of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit, which On July 7, 2014 and amended on March 6,
2018: (1) vacated the 2015 verified recycler exclusion for
hazardous waste that is recycled off-site (except for certain
provisions); (2) reinstated the transfer-based exclusion from the
2008 rule to replace the now-vacated 2015 verified recycler
exclusion; (3) upheld the containment and emergency preparedness
provisions and the eligibility of spent petroleum catalysts for the
reinstated transfer-based exclusion; (4) vacated factor 4 of the
2015 definition of legitimate recycling in its entirety; and (5)
reinstated the 2008 version of factor 4 to replace the now-vacated
2015 version of factor 4. The court issued the mandate for its
decision on March 14, 2018, at which point the orders became
effective. As a result, some of the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements under this ICR no longer apply, while other
requirements that had previously applied were reinstated.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.