2018-09-12_SS_1545-1518rAB

2018-09-12_SS_1545-1518rAB.doc

HSA, Archer MSA, or Medicare Advantage MSA Information

OMB: 1545-1518

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Internal Revenue Service

Supporting Statement

OMB# 1545-1518

(Form 5498-SA)


1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Section 220(h) requires trustees to report to the IRS and medical savings accountholders contributions to and the year-end fair market value of any contributions made to a medical savings account (MSA). Congress requires Treasury to report to them the total contributions made to an MSA for the current tax year.


Section 1201 of the Medicare prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003(P.L.108-173) created new Code section 223.Section 223(h) requires the reporting of contributions to and the year-end fair market value of health savings accounts for tax years beginning after December 31, 2003.


2. USE OF DATA


The data will be matched by the IRS with the information reported on Forms 1099-SA to determine if distributions were timely rolled over to another MSA or subject to a penalty. Congress will use the data to determine the loss of tax revenue.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


Electronic filing is currently available for Form 5498-SA.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.

5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


There is no burden on small businesses or entities by this collection due to the inapplicability of the authorizing statute to this type of entity.

6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


A less frequent collection would hinder the IRS from determining if distributions were timely rolled over to another MSA or subject to a penalty. Congress will use the data to determine the loss of tax revenue.



  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).

  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS



In response to the Federal Register Notice (83 FR 12078), dated March 19, 2018, we received no comments during the comment period regarding Form 5498-SA.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No gifts or payments are being provided to any respondents.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Customer Account Data Engine (CADE2)” system and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for these systems under IRS 24.030 - CADE Individual Master File; IRS 24.046 - CADE Business Master File; IRS 34.047 - IRS Audit Trail and Security Records System. The Department of Treasury PIAs can be found at http://www.treasury.gov/privacy/PIAs/Pages/default.aspx.


Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.

.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION

Authority

Description

# of Respondents

# Responses per Respondent

Annual Responses

Hours per Response

Total Burden

IRC 220(H)

F5498-SA

9167

1

9167

.17

1559

Totals




9167


1559



13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.

14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


The Federal government cost estimate is based on a model that considers the following three cost factors for each information product: aggregate labor costs for development, including annualized start up expenses, operating and maintenance expenses, and distribution of the product that collects the information. 


The government computes cost using a multi-step process.  First, the government creates a weighted factor for the level of effort to create each information collection product based on variables such as; complexity, number of pages, type of product and frequency of revision.  Second, the total costs associated with developing the product such as labor cost, and operating expenses associated with the downstream impact such as support functions, are added together to obtain the aggregated total cost.  Then, the aggregated total cost and factor are multiplied together to obtain the aggregated cost per product.  Lastly, the aggregated cost per product is added to the cost of shipping and printing each product to IRS offices, National Distribution Center, libraries and other outlets. The result is the Government cost estimate per product.


The government cost estimate for this collection is summarized in the table below.


Product

Aggregate Cost per Product (factor applied)


Printing and Distribution


Government Cost Estimate per Product

Form 5498-SA

80,558

+

0

=

80,558

Grand Total

80,558


0


80,558

Table costs are based on 2016 actuals obtained from IRS Chief Financial Office and Media and Publications

* New product costs will be included in the next collection update.





15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change to the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are also making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.

  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation and/or form sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.




  1. EXCEPTION TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.




File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement
AuthorRJDurb00
Last Modified BySYSTEM
File Modified2018-09-12
File Created2018-09-12

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy