Fishery Products Subject to Trade Restrictions Pursuant to Certification Under the High Seas Driftnet Fishing (HSDF) Moratorium Protection Act

ICR 201808-0648-007

OMB: 0648-0651

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Form
Modified
Supplementary Document
2018-08-07
Supporting Statement A
2018-08-07
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
200764 Modified
ICR Details
0648-0651 201808-0648-007
Historical Active 201701-0648-013
DOC/NOAA
Fishery Products Subject to Trade Restrictions Pursuant to Certification Under the High Seas Driftnet Fishing (HSDF) Moratorium Protection Act
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Emergency 08/15/2018
Approved without change 08/10/2018
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 08/07/2018
The Office of Management and Budget approves this revision to an existing information collection for 180 days, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act § 3507(j)(2). The agency is requested to submit a revision request for this information collection in accordance with § 3507(a) for these changes to remain effective beyond 180 days.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
02/28/2019 6 Months From Approved 11/30/2020
900 0 600
150 0 100
9,000 0 6,000

To ensure that the United States is compliant with its obligations as a Member of the WTO to be non-discriminatory in matters of trade, it is necessary to avoid trade restrictions that are so broad as to affect fisheries not governed by the injunction. Products of fisheries that do not employ gillnets or do not operate within the marine areas occupied by the vaquita must remain admissible to the U.S. seafood market. To accomplish the necessary balance, NMFS proposes to use a certification of admissibility whereby an official of the Government of Mexico would attest to the origin of the fish offered for entry into the United States as being derived from a fishery that did not employ gill nets or that was not operating the range of the vaquita. Absent such certification, the fish products would be deemed inadmissible and the entry filing would be rejected. NMFS would work with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to identify those fish and fish products that would be subject to the import certification requirements so as not to unnecessarily burden fisheries not subject to the court-ordered injunction.
We are seeking an emergency Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) clearance of revisions to an information collection previously approved under OMB Control No. 0648-0651. That collection implements certification of admissibility requirements for certain fish products exported from nations that are subject to trade restrictions under the authority of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act. The revisions are necessary to extend the certification of admissibility requirements for certain fish products exported from nations that are subject to trade restrictions under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). These certification requirements are necessary to ensure that fish products subject to trade restrictions are not admitted into United States commerce. This action is intended to implement requirements of the MMPA while also ensuring that the United States is also in compliance with its obligations as a Member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Failure to approve the MMPA certification of admissibility requirements on this emergency basis could lead to a violation of a recent court ruling to prohibit imports of fish products. Plaintiffs Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Biological Diversity, and Animal Welfare Institute brought action in the United States Court of International Trade to prevent irreparable harm to the vaquita, a critically endangered marine mammal endemic to Mexican waters of the northern Gulf of California. The principal cause of the vaquita’s decline is entanglement and drowning in gillnets. If current levels of legal and illegal gillnet fishing continue, the species will likely be extinct in a few years. Prior to the lawsuit, the plaintiffs had petitioned NMFS to prohibit, under the authority of the MMPA, the import of fish and fish products from these fisheries. On July 26, 2018, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion for “a preliminary injunction requiring the Government, pending final adjudication of the merits, to ban the importation of all fish and fish products from Mexican commercial fisheries that use gillnets within the vaquita’s range.” To ensure that the United States is compliant with its obligations as a Member of the WTO to be non-discriminatory in matters of trade, it is necessary to avoid trade restrictions that are so broad as to affect fisheries not governed by the injunction. Products of fisheries that do not employ gillnets or do not operate within the marine areas occupied by the vaquita must remain admissible to the U.S. seafood market. To accomplish the necessary balance, NMFS proposes to use a certification of admissibility whereby an official of the Government of Mexico would attest to the origin of the fish offered for entry into the United States as being derived from a fishery that did not employ gill nets or that was not operating the range of the vaquita. Absent such certification, the fish products would be deemed inadmissible and the entry filing would be rejected. NMFS would work with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to identify those fish and fish products that would be subject to the import certification requirements so as not to unnecessarily burden fisheries not subject to the court-ordered injunction.

US Code: 16 USC 1826d-k Name of Law: High Seas Driftnet Fishing Protection Moratorium Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Proof of Admissibility NA Certificate of Admissibility

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 900 600 0 300 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 150 100 0 50 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 9,000 6,000 0 3,000 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
Program Change: Based on an estimated 50% more activity in certifications filed due to the new MMPA requirement, new totals would be: 90 respondents, 900 responses and 150 hours, with recordkeeping/reporting costs remaining at a maximum of $10 per U.S. importer per year.

$24,270
No
    No
    No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Christopher Rogers 3017139090 ext. 117

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
08/07/2018


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy