2018-09-25_SS_1545-1536rSC

2018-09-25_SS_1545-1536rSC.doc

REG-209823-96 (TD 8791) - Guidance Regarding Charitable Remainder Trusts and Special Valuation Rules for Transfer of Interests in Trusts

OMB: 1545-1536

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Final-TD 8791 (REG-209823-96)

Guidance Regarding Charitable Remainder Trusts and Special Valuation Rules for Transfers of Interests in Trusts

OMB Control No. 1545-1536



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


A charitable remainder trust provides for a specified periodic distribution to one or more beneficiaries for life or for a term of years with an irrevocable remainder interest held for the benefit of charity. A contribution to a charitable remainder trust generally qualifies for a charitable deduction. Under the legislative history to the charitable remainder trust provisions, a taxpayer can claim a charitable deduction for a contribution of assets that do not have an objective, ascertainable value only if an independent trustee values such assets. H.R. Rep. No. 413, 91st Cong., 1st Sess.60 (1969), 1969-3 C.B. 200, 239. For certain types of charitable remainder trusts, an independent trustee would have to make the valuation each year the trust holds difficult-to-value assets. Some taxpayers have complained that using an independent trustee is costly and often impractical. Therefore, to provide an alternative method, the regulations allow a taxpayer to use a current qualified appraisal (as defined in §1.170A-13(c)(3)) from a qualified appraiser (as defined in §1.170A-13(c)(5)) for valuing a trust’s difficult-to-value assets.


  1. USE OF DATA


The recordkeeping requirement collected will enables the IRS to determine if a taxpayer properly claimed a charitable deduction for a contribution to a charitable remainder trust.


  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


There are no plans to provide electronic filing because electronic filing is not appropriate for the collection of information in this submission due to the requirement to attach the document of affirmative election. IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.



5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


The collection of information requirement will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.



  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES

Consequences of less frequent collection on federal programs or policy activities, could result in the IRS inability to determine if a taxpayer properly claimed a charitable deduction for a contribution to a charitable remainder trust using the alternative method and used a current qualified appraisal (as defined in §1.170A-13(c)(3). The information collected will enable the IRS to keep track of charitable deduction for a contribution and notify the taxpayer of any discrepancies, as outlined in the taxpayer bill of rights.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


The notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on April 18, 1997 (62 FR 19072). Comments were received, and a public hearing was held on November 18, 1997. Treasury adopted the proposed regulations as revised. The final regulations became effective on December 10, 1998.

In response to the Federal Register notice dated June 12, 2018, (83 FR 27374, we received no comments during the comment regarding TD 8791.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) is collected.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Regulation section 1.664-1(a)(7) provides that either an independent trustee or a qualified appraiser using a qualified appraisal must value a charitable remainder trusts assets that do not have an objective, ascertainable value. The trust must retain the valuation. For certain charitable remainder trusts, the valuation of the trust’s assets is an annual requirement. Therefore, if such trusts hold difficult-to-value assets and do not have an independent trustee value for those assets, the trust must retain a qualified appraisal from a qualified appraiser for valuing the assets.

The burden estimate is as follows:

Authority

Description

# of Respondents

# Responses per Respondent

Annual Responses

Hours per Response

Total Burden Hrs.

IRC 664

TD 8791

150

1

150

.5

75

Totals


150

1

150

.5

75


13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.



  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There are no start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of service associated with this collection.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPRO- PRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the

expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.






File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorRJDurb00
Last Modified BySYSTEM
File Modified2018-09-25
File Created2018-09-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy