1090-0009 60 Day Notice

20852

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2018 / Notices

Dated: April 24, 2018.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
[18XD4523WS DS62200000
DWSN00000.000000 DP.62206; OMB Control
Number 1090–0009]

[FR Doc. 2018–09776 Filed 5–7–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Donor Certification Form

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary, Office
of Financial Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Information
Collection; request for comment.
AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900253G]

Indian Gaming; Tribal-State Class III
Gaming Compact Taking Effect in the
State of Arizona
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before July 9,
2018.

DATES:

The notice announces that the
Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact
entered into between the Hopi Tribe of
Arizona and State of Arizona is taking
effect.
DATES: This compact take effect on May
8, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100–
497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. As required by IGRA
and 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts are
subject to review and approval by the
Secretary. The Secretary took no action
on the compact between the Hopi Tribe
of Arizona and the State of Arizona
within 45 days of its submission.
Therefore, the Compact is considered to
have been approved, but only to the
extent the Compact is consistent with
IGRA. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).
SUMMARY:

Dated: April 20, 2018.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs, Exercising the Authority of the Acting
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018–09800 Filed 5–7–18; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the Office of Financial Management are
proposing to renew an information
collection.

SUMMARY:

BILLING CODE 4337–15–P

Send your comments on
this information collection request (ICR)
by mail to Paul Batlan, Office of
Financial Management, 1849 C St. NW,
MS 2557 MIB, Washington, DC 20240,
or email him at Paul_Batlan@
ios.doi.gov. Please reference OMB
Control Number 1090–0009 in the
subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Paul Batlan by email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we provide the
general public and other Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on new, proposed, revised,
and continuing collections of
information. This helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. It also helps the
public understand our information
collection requirements and provide the
requested data in the desired format.
We are soliciting comments on the
proposed ICR that is described below.
We are especially interested in public
comment addressing the following
issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to
the proper functions of the Office of
Financial Management; (2) will this
information be processed and used in a
timely manner; (3) is the estimate of
burden accurate; (4) how might the
Office of Financial Management
ADDRESSES:

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(5) how might the Office of Financial
Management minimize the burden of
this collection on the respondents,
including through the use of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: This notice identifies an
information collection activity that the
Office of Financial Management has
submitted to OMB for approval for the
Department and its bureaus to continue
to collect information from proposed
donors relative to their relationship(s)
with the Department. The Department
and its individual bureaus have gift
acceptance authorities. In support of the
variety of donation authorities in the
Department and increasing numbers of
donations, it is the policy of the
Department to ask those proposing to
donate gifts valued at $25,000 or more
to provide information regarding their
relationship with the Department. The
purpose of this policy is to ensure that
the acceptance of a gift does not create
legal or ethical issues for the
Department, its bureaus, or potential
donors. The information will be
gathered through the use of a form that
collects information relevant to the
acceptability of the proposed donation
in conformance with the Department’s
donations policy. The form is completed
and certified by the prospective donor
then submitted to the Department or its
bureau for review. Having the donor
certify his or her interactions with the
Department gives the staff vetting the
proposed donation basic information to
be verified, resulting in a more efficient
and timely donation review process.
The information collected is as follows:

Information collected

Reason for collection

Name, and indication whether executing in individual capacity, or on
behalf of an organization.

To identify the donor, and whether the donor is acting individually or on
behalf of an organization.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:41 May 07, 2018

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00066

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM

08MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2018 / Notices
Information collected

Reason for collection

Declaration whether the donor is involved with litigation or controversy
with the Department.

To assist the Department in determining whether there are any issues
associated with the proffer of the gift that need to be more closely
examined.
To assist the Department in determining whether there are any issues
associated with the proffer of the gift that need to be more closely
examined.
To assist the Department in determining whether there are any issues
associated with the proffer of the gift that need to be more closely
examined.
To assist the Department in determining whether there are any issues
associated with the proffer of the gift that need to be more closely
examined.
To assist the Department in determining whether there are any issues
associated with the proffer of the gift that need to be more closely
examined.
To assist the Department in determining the scope and context of the
donation, and to assist in determining whether there are any issues
associated with the proffer of the gift that need to be more closely
examined.
To establish the contact information of the potential donor, and have
the certifier sign the certification form.

Declaration whether the donor is engaged in any financial or business
relationship with the Department.
Declaration whether the donor has been debarred, excluded or disqualified from the non-procurement common rule, or otherwise declared ineligible from doing business with any Federal agency.
Declaration as to whether the donation is expected to be involved with
marketing or advertising.
Declaration whether the donor is seeking to attach conditions to the donation.
Declaration whether this proposed donation is or is not part of a series
of donations to the Department.
Signature, Printed Name, Date, Organization, Email address, City,
State, Zip, and daytime or work phone number.

Title of Collection: Donor Certification
Form.
OMB Control Number: 1090–0009.
Form Number: DI–3680.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or households, Businesses,
Not-for-profit institutions, Tribal
governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 100.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 100.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: 20 Minutes.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 33 Hours.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: Once per
prospective donor per fiscal year.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: None.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

20853

Douglas A. Glenn,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Director,
Office of Financial Management.
[FR Doc. 2018–09745 Filed 5–7–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334–63–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:41 May 07, 2018

Jkt 244001

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
William R. Montiel, M.D.; Decision and
Order
On August 10, 2017, the Acting
Assistant Administrator, Diversion
Control Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to William R. Montiel, M.D.
(hereinafter, Registrant), of Prattville,
Alabama. GX 2. The Show Cause Order
proposed the revocation of Registrant’s
authority under his DEA Certificate of
Registration to dispense schedule II
controlled substances, and the denial of
‘‘any applications for renewal or
modification of such [s]chedule II
authority and any applications for any
other DEA registrations with [s]chedule
II authority pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
824(a)(3), because [he has] no state
authority to handle controlled
substances.’’ Id. at 1.
With respect to the Agency’s
jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant is registered as a
practitioner with authority to dispense
controlled substances in schedules II
through V under Certificate of
Registration No. FM0822812, at the
location of 554C McQueen Smith Road,
Prattville, Alabama. Id. The Order
further alleged that this registration does
not expire until January 31, 2020. Id.
As the substantive ground for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that ‘‘[o]n March 7, 2017, the
Medical Licensure Commission of
Alabama issued an Order restricting
[Registrant’s] license to practice
medicine in . . . Alabama such that [he]
‘shall not prescribe any substance listed
in [s]chedule II of the Alabama

PO 00000

Frm 00067

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Controlled Substance Act . . . or any
substance listed on the [DEA’s] listing of
[s]hedule II controlled substances.’’’ Id.
at 1–2. The Show Cause Order thus
alleged that as a result of the
Commission’s action, Registrant is
‘‘currently without authority to handle
[s]chedule II controlled substances in
. . . Alabama, the [S]tate in which [he
is] registered with’’ DEA, and that as a
consequence, his schedule II authority
is subject to revocation. Id. at 1–2.
The Show Cause Order notified
Registrant of his right to a hearing or to
submit a written statement while
waiving his right to a hearing, the
procedure for electing either option, and
the consequence of failing either option.
Id. at 2 (citing 21 CFR 1301.43(a) & (c)).
The Order also notified Registrant of his
right to submit a corrective action plan.
Id. at 2–3.
On October 25, 2017, the Government
submitted a Request for Final Agency
Action (RFAA I). GX 5, at 4. Therein,
the Government represented that ‘‘[o]n
August 10, 2017, personnel from DEA’s
Office of Chief Counsel, Diversion and
Regulatory Section, mailed a copy of the
Order to Registrant’s registered address
via first-class United States mail’’ and
that the letter was not returned ‘‘as
undeliverable.’’ Id. The Government
further represented that Registrant had
neither requested a hearing, nor
submitted a written statement while
waiving his right to a hearing, within
the 30-day time period following service
for electing either option. Id. The
Government thus maintained that
Registrant had waived his right to either
a hearing or to submit a written
statement and sought a final order.
On review, I held that the
Government’s effort at service was ‘‘a

E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM

08MYN1