2018-10-25_SS_1545-0202rSC

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Internal Revenue Service

IRS Forms 5310, Application for Determination for Terminating Plan; and

Form 6088, Distributable Benefits from Employee Pension Benefit Plans

OMB Control No. 1545-0202

1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 404 allows employers an income tax deduction for contributions to their qualified (under section 401(a)) deferred compensation plans.

2. USE OF DATA

Form 5310 is used to request an IRS determination letter about the plan’s qualification status qualified or nonqualified) under Code section 401(a). Form 6088 is used to show the amounts of distributable benefits to participants in the plan.

3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN

Forms 5310 and 6088 cannot be filed electronically, since their relatively low volume does not justify the cost electronic enabling.

4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION

The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available or use or adaption from another source.

5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESS OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES

There is no burden on small businesses or entities by this collection due to the inapplicability of the authorizing statute to this type of entity.

6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES

Form 5310 is used to request an IRS determination letter about the plan’s qualification status and Form 6088 is used to show the amounts of distributable benefits to participants in the plan. A less frequent collection would prevent the IRS from verifying the amounts of distributable benefits under section 401(a). This would affect both the employer and the government in ensuring proper tax compliance.

7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).

8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS

In response to the Federal Register notice dated June 27, 2018, (83 FR 30222), we received no comments during the comment period regarding Forms 5310 and 6088.

9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS

No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.

9. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES

Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.

9. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS

A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Business Master File (BMF)” system and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for this system under IRS 24.046-Business Master File and IRS 34.037-Audit Trail and Security Records System.  The Internal Revenue Service PIAs can be found at https://www.IRS.gov/uac/Privacy-Impact-Assessments-PIA.

Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems. 

9. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION

The burden estimate is as follows:

Authority	Description	# of Respondents	# Responses per Respondent	Annual Responses	Hours per Response	Total Burden
IRC 401(a)	Form 5310	812	1	812	96.87	78658
415	Form 6088	432	1	432	8.27 hrs.	3573
	Totals	1244		1244		82,231

9. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS

To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.

14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

The estimated annualized cost to the Federal Government is based on a model that considers the following three factors for each information product: aggregate labor costs for development, including annualized start -up expenses, operating and maintenance expenses, and distribution of the product that collects the information.

The government computes cost using a multi-step process.  First, the government creates a weighted factor for the level of effort to create each information collection product based on variables such as; complexity, number of pages, type of product and frequency of revision.  Second, the total costs associated with developing the product such as labor cost, and operating expenses associated with the downstream impact such as support functions, are added together to obtain the aggregated total cost.  Then, the aggregated total cost and factor are multiplied together to obtain the aggregated cost per product.  Lastly, the aggregated cost per product is added to the cost of shipping and printing each product to IRS offices, National Distribution Center, libraries and other outlets. The result is the Federal Government estimated annualized cost per product.

The federal government estimated annualized cost is as follows:

Product	Aggregate Cost per Product (factor applied)		Printing and Distribution		Government Cost Estimate per Product
Form 5310	16,882	+	0	=	16,882
Instructions 5310	3,972		0	=	3,972
Form 6088	11,917	+	0	=	11,917
Grand Total	32,771	+	0	=	32,771
Table costs are based on 2016 actuals obtained from IRS Chief Financial Office and Media and Publications
* New product costs will be updated in the next revision of this collection.

15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN

The change in the burden previously approved by OMB, resulted from combining and totaling multiple years of responses, instead of reporting each year separately. The updated changes to responses resulted in a decrease of (38,756) responses, resulting in a total burden decrease of (1,636,069) total annual burden hours. Also, we are making this submission to renew he OMB approval.

	Requested	Program Change Due to New Statue	Program Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA	Previously Approved
Annual Number of Responses	1,244	0	0	-38,756	0	40,000
Annual Time Burden (Hr.)	82,231	0	0	-1,636,069	0	1,718,300
Annual Cost Burden ($)	0	0	0	0	0	0

16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION

There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.

17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE

IRS believes that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulations sunset as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.

18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT

There are no exceptions to the certification statement.

Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

5