2018-09-25_SS_1545-0238rKD

2018-09-25_SS_1545-0238rKD.docx

Form W-2G--Certain Gambling Winnings

OMB: 1545-0238

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Internal Revenue Service

Certain Gambling Winnings

Form W2-G

OMB No. 1545-0238



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


IRC sections 6041, 3402(q), and 3406 require the reporting of, and the withholding of tax on, certain gambling winnings. Regulations section 31.3402(q)-1 of the Employment Tax Regulations names Form W-2G as the reporting vehicle. The tax is withheld by the payers of gambling winnings.

  1. USE OF DATA


The form is used by IRS to verify compliance with the reporting rules and to verify that the recipient of the gambling winnings has properly reported them on his or her tax return.


  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN

IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998. The agency is offering electronic filing of Form W2-G.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


There are no small businesses or other small entities affected by this form.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


A less frequent collection will not enable the IRS to meet its mission by verifying the foreign tax credits are being computed properly and in accordance with Internal Revenue Code § 26 USC 6041, 3402(q), and 3406, and will hinder the IRS from meeting its mission.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).



  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


In response to the Federal Register notice dated August 7, 2018 (83 FR 38764), we received no comments during the comment period for these revenue procedures.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.

  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Business Master File (BMF)” system and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for this system under:

Treasury/IRS 24.046 CADE Business Master File (BMF)

Treasury/IRS 24.047 Audit Underreporter Case File

Treasury/IRS 34.037 IRS Audit Trail and Security Records System

Treasury/IRS 36.003 General Personnel and Payroll Records IRS. The Department of Treasury PIAs can be found at

https://www.treasury.gov/privacy/PIAs/Pages/default.aspx .


Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Authority

Description

# Respondents

# Responses Per Respondent

# Annual Responses

Hours Per Response

Total Burden

Form W2-G

Form W-2G--Certain Gambling Winnings

15,349,567

1

15,349,567

24 minutes

6,293,323 hours

TOTAL


15,349,567


15,349,567


6,293,323 hours


  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


The Federal government cost estimate is based on a model that considers the following three cost factors for each information product: aggregate labor costs for development, including annualized start up expenses, operating and maintenance expenses, and distribution of the product that collects the information.


The government computes cost using a multi-step process. First, the government creates a weighted factor for the level of effort to create each information collection product based on variables such as; complexity, number of pages, type of product and frequency of revision. Second, the total costs associated with developing the product such as labor cost, and operating expenses associated with the downstream impact such as support functions, are added together to obtain the aggregated total cost. Then, the aggregated total cost and factor are multiplied together to obtain the aggregated cost per product. Lastly, the aggregated cost per product is added to the cost of shipping and printing each product to IRS offices, National Distribution Center, libraries and other outlets. The result is the Government cost estimate per product.


The government cost estimate for this collection is $92,584.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


The number of respondents increased due to a change in the agency estimate based on Publication 6292, Fiscal Year Return Projections for the United States: 2018-2025, Spring 2018.


 

Requested

Program Change Due to New Statute

Program Change Due to Agency Discretion

Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate

Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA

Previously Approved

Annual Number of Responses for this IC

15,349,567

0

0

4849867

0

10499700

Annual Time Burden (Hr)

6,293,323

0

0

1988446

0

4304877


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis, and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it would cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the form sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers may not be aware that the IRS intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement for this collection.



Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

5

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-20

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy