Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | ||||||||||||
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS | ||||||||||||
Boiler Type | Number of Respondents per Year (Average) | Number of Units (Average) | Number of Responses Per Year (Average) | Reporting | Recordkeeping | Total Labor Hours | Total Labor Cost | Total Annual O&M and Annualized Capital Costs per year | Total Costs | No. Response per Respondent | Total Annual Response | |
Existing Large Solid Units | 121 | 1,040 | 242 | 135,217 | 61,410 | 196,627 | $21,531,254.93 | $74,866,304 | $96,397,558.93 | 1.99 | 242 | |
New Large Solid Units | 3 | 26 | 12 | 3,857 | 1,603 | 5,460 | $597,908.52 | $3,223,948.00 | $3,821,856.52 | 4.00 | 12 | |
Existing Small and Limited Use Solid Units | 5 | 41 | 3 | 347 | 156 | 503 | $55,093.72 | $98,032.00 | $153,125.72 | 0.56 | 3 | |
New Small Solid Units | 1 | 2 | 3 | 74 | 48 | 122 | $13,348.42 | $4,456.00 | $17,804.42 | 3.00 | 3 | |
Existing Large Liquid Units | 66 | 570 | 132 | 77,487 | 33,638 | 111,125 | $12,168,470.96 | $17,695,826 | $29,864,296.96 | 2.00 | 132 | |
New Large Liquid Units | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
Existing Small and Limited Use Liquid Units | 45 | 385 | 23 | 3,045 | 1,220 | 4,265 | $467,037.32 | $857,780 | $1,324,817.32 | 0.51 | 23 | |
New Small Liquid Units | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0.00 | $0 | $0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | |
Existing Large Gaseous Units | 669 | 5,733 | 1,530 | 142,506 | 22,654 | 165,160 | $18,085,504.87 | $18,867,183 | $36,952,687.87 | 2.29 | 1530 | |
New Large Gaseous Units | 33 | 261 | 99 | 6,258 | 3,546 | 9,804 | $1,073,571.94 | $750,375 | $1,823,946.94 | 2.97 | 99 | |
Existing Small and Limited Use Gaseous Units | 1,027 | 8,811 | 514 | 69,654 | 27,358 | 97,012 | $10,623,107.89 | $13,921,380.00 | $24,544,487.89 | 0.50 | 514 | |
New Small Gaseous Units | 41 | 326 | 103 | 4,725 | 2,027 | 6,752 | $739,326.22 | $726,328.00 | $1,465,654.22 | 2.50 | 103 | |
Subtotals (all types) | 2,012 | 17,196 | 2,661 | 443,169 | 153,660 | 596,829 | 65,354,625 | $131,011,612 | $196,366,237 | 1.32 | 2661 | |
GRAND TOTAL (rounded)1 | 597,000 | $65,400,000 | $131,000,000 | $196,000,000 | 224 | hours per response | ||||||
Rounded by Sector1 | ||||||||||||
Total Private Sector | 1,891 | 2,501 | 416,579 | 144,441 | 561,000 | $61,400,000 | $123,000,000 | $185,000,000 | ||||
Total Public Sector | 121 | 160 | 26,590 | 9,220 | 35,800 | $3,920,000 | $7,860,000 | $11,800,000 | ||||
1 Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters | |||||||||||||
(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | |||||||||||||
Burden Item | EPA hours per occurrence (A) | Number of occurrences per year (B) | EPA hours per occurrence per year (C=AxB) | Technical hours per year (D=C) | Mangmt hours per year (E=Dx0.05) | Clerical hours per year (F=Dx0.1) | (H) Costs, $ k | Footnotes | |||||
1. | Familiarization with rule requirements | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0.00 | a | ||||
2. | Enter and update information into agency recordkeeping system | 2 | 156 | 312 | 312 | 15.6 | 31.2 | $16,823.66 | b | ||||
3. | Required activities | ||||||||||||
A. | Review and approve monitoring plan | 20 | 3 | 60 | 60 | 3 | 6 | $3,235.32 | n | ||||
B. | Review and approve fuel monitoring plan | 20 | 418 | 8,360 | 8,360 | 418 | 836 | $450,787.92 | o | ||||
C. | Observe initial stack/performance test | 40 | 21 | 840 | 840 | 42 | 84 | $45,294.48 | c | ||||
D. | Observe repeat performance test | 40 | 117 | 4,680 | 4,680 | 234 | 468 | $252,354.96 | d | ||||
E. | Review operating parameters | 2 | 104 | 208 | 208 | 10.4 | 20.8 | $11,215.78 | e | ||||
F. | Review continuous parameter monitoring | 2 | 1,714 | 3,428 | 3,428 | 171.4 | 342.8 | $184,844.62 | f | ||||
4 | Excess Emissions Enforcement Activities and Inspections | 24 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | g | ||||
5 | Notification requirements | ||||||||||||
A. | Review initial notification that sources are subject to the standard | 2 | 78 | 156 | 156 | 7.8 | 15.6 | $8,411.83 | b | ||||
B. | Review notification of initial performance tests and review test plan | 20 | 104 | 2,080 | 2,080 | 104 | 208 | $112,157.76 | e | ||||
C. | Review notification of compliance status | 2 | 78 | 156 | 156 | 7.8 | 15.6 | $8,411.83 | b | ||||
6. | Reporting requirements | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0.00 | |||||||
A. | Review semiannual compliance report | 4 | 398 | 1,592 | 1,592 | 79.6 | 159.2 | $85,843.82 | h | ||||
B. | Review annual compliance report | 2 | 660 | 1,320 | 1,320 | 66.0 | 132.0 | $71,177.04 | i | ||||
C. | Review biennial compliance report | 1 | 560 | 560 | 560 | 28 | 56 | $30,169.36 | j | ||||
B. | Review initial report on results of energy audit | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | L | ||||
7. | Travel Expenses for Tests Attended | 3 days * ($201 hotel + $93 meals/incidentals) + ($600 round trip) = $1482 per trip | $204,516 | m | |||||||||
TOTAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded) | 27,300 | $1,490,000 | p | ||||||||||
a Number of hours for agency staff to refamiliarize themselves with the rule requirements. | |||||||||||||
b Number of occurences is based on the total number of affected facilities that are required to submit initial notifications (all new boilers in the large and small solid, liquid, and gaseous subcategories). | |||||||||||||
c Number of occurences is based on the assumption that EPA personnel will observe 20% of the initial performance tests that occur. | |||||||||||||
d Number of occurences is based on the assumption that of the units that test, 10% will have to retest and EPA personnel will observe all these retests. In addition solid fuel units are expected to re-test to obtain worst-case conditions for both Hg and HCl emissions. | |||||||||||||
e Number of occurences is based on the number of units that will test and set/submit operating limits. | |||||||||||||
f Number of occurences is based on the number of units maintaining records of control device parameters. | |||||||||||||
g Number of occurences is based on the assumption that of the units that test, 10% of them will have exceedances and need enforcement. | |||||||||||||
h Number of occurences is the number of units that will submit these semi-annual compliance reports, 2 reports per year per respondent. | |||||||||||||
i. Number of occurences is the number of units that will submit these annual compliance reports. | |||||||||||||
j. Number of occurences is the number units that will submit these biennial compliance reports. | |||||||||||||
k These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2010 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees. These rates can be obtained from the OPM web site, http//www.opm.gov/oca/payrates/index/htm. | |||||||||||||
L Energy audits only occur at existing facilities. | |||||||||||||
m Total cost is based on the number of trips taken by EPA to observe performance tests in year 1 (4.A. & 4.B.) multiplied by $1482 per trip. The source for hotel and meals/incidental costs is based on FY18 per diem rates, averaged across all locations in the United States. Airfares are estimated based on experience from other rulemakings. See: https://www.perdiem101.com/conus/2018 | |||||||||||||
n Number of occurences is based number of affected facilities which submit monitoring plan, all new and existing large units are required to submit this. | |||||||||||||
o Number of occurences is based off facilities which have emission limits plus gas units which must perform Hg spec analysis | |||||||||||||
p Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
Table 3: Respondents and Units by Subcategory – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters | ||||||||||
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||||||
Boiler Type | Respondents per Year (Current) | Units per Year (Current) | New Respondents per Year | New Units Per Year | Total Respondents | Total Units | Total Respondents | Total Units | Total Respondents | Total Units |
Large Solid Units | 118 | 1,014 | 3 | 26 | 121 | 1,040 | 125 | 1,066 | 128 | 1,092 |
Small and Limited Use Solid Unitsa | 5 | 40 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 42 | 6 | 44 | 6 | 46 |
Large Liquid Units | 66 | 570 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 570 | 66 | 570 | 66 | 570 |
Small and Limited Use Liquid Units | 45 | 385 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 385 | 45 | 385 | 45 | 385 |
Large Gaseous Units | 636 | 5,472 | 33 | 261 | 669 | 5,733 | 703 | 5,995 | 736 | 6,256 |
Small and Limited Use Gaseous Units | 986 | 8,485 | 41 | 326 | 1,027 | 8,811 | 1,068 | 9,137 | 1,109 | 9,463 |
Subtotals | 1,856 | 15,966 | 78 | 615 | 1,934 | 16,581 | 2,012 | 17,197 | 2,090 | 17,812 |
a For new small solid-fuel units, only one new respondent is anticipated for the duration of the three year period. |
Agency Labor Rates | |||
Managerial | $64.80 | Updated Labor rates to 2017 General Schedule | |
Clerical | $26.02 | ||
Technical | $48.08 | ||
Per Diem Info | |||
Hotel | $201 | average 2018 rates, https://www.perdiem101.com/conus/2018 | |
Meals | $93 | average 2018 rates, https://www.perdiem101.com/conus/2018 | |
Airfare | $600 | ||
Trip Length | 3 | ||
Other Data | |||
Percent of Stack Tests Observed | 20% | ||
Estimated Percent Retesting | 10% | ||
Estimated Percent Emission Exceedences | 10% |
Table 1.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | |||||||||||||||||
Existing Large Solid Fuel Units | |||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Stack Testing and Fuel Analysis Cost Per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year [(B+C+D)xExG] | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | |||
1. Applications | na | ||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | ||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 10 | 121 | 1,210 | 121 | 61 | $152,373 | $0 | 121 | a | |||
B. Required Activities | |||||||||||||||||
1. Conduct Energy Audit | |||||||||||||||||
a) Commerical | 20 | $854 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | |||
b) Industrial | 20 | $18,292 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | |||
2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,h | |||
3. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4. Initial Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
5. Initial Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
6. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 1,040 | 12,480 | 1,248.0 | 624.0 | $1,571,588 | $5,200,000 | 0 | c,h,i | |||
7. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 1,040 | 12,480 | 1,248.0 | 624.0 | $1,571,588 | $8,320,000 | 0 | c, i | |||
8. Annual Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 1,040 | 12,480 | 1,248.0 | 624.0 | $1,571,588 | $8,320,000 | 0 | c, i | |||
9. Annual Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 1,040 | 12,480 | 1,248.0 | 624.0 | $1,571,588 | $7,280,000 | 0 | c, i | |||
10. Repeat Stack Test and Report if Switch Fuels (for Hg and HCl) |
24 | $0 | $16,000 | $0 | 1 | 24 | 1,040 | 24,960 | 2,496 | 1,248 | $3,143,175 | $16,640,000 | 0 | c,j | |||
11. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,g | |||
12. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,g | |||
13. Annual Tune-up | 12 | $0 | $2,875 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 1,040 | 12,480 | 1,248.0 | 624.0 | $1,571,588 | $2,990,000 | 0 | c,k | |||
14. Continuous Parameter Monitoring | m | ||||||||||||||||
Establish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) | 40 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
Opacity | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $14,700 | 1 | 10 | 528 | 5,280 | 528.0 | 264.0 | $664,902 | $7,761,600 | 0 | c,m | |||
PM (only sources greater than 250 mmBtu/hr) | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $158,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,L,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $56,100 | 1 | 10 | 207 | 2,070 | 207.0 | 103.5 | $260,672 | $11,612,700 | 0 | c,L,m | |||
O2 | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $8,523 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $1,436 | 1 | 10 | 1,114 | 11,140 | 1,114 | 557 | $1,402,843 | $1,599,704 | 0 | c,m | |||
Scrubber System Monitoring and Operation (for units with wet scrubbers) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $24,300 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $5,600 | 1 | 10 | 401 | 4,010 | 401 | 201 | $504,973 | $2,245,600 | 0 | c,m | |||
Bag Leak Detection System Operation (sources that have fabric filters) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $25,500 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 61 | 610 | 61 | 30.5 | $76,816 | $591,700 | 0 | c,m | |||
DIFF Monitor | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,500 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $26,500 | 1 | 10 | 76 | 760 | 76 | 38.0 | $95,706 | $2,014,000 | 0 | c,m | |||
Carbon Injection Monitoring System (all sources that use ACI to control Hg) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $115,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 300 | 30 | 15.0 | $37,779 | $291,000 | 0 | c,m | |||
C. Create Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | |||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4) Semi-annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 40 | 121 | 4,840 | 484 | 242 | $609,494 | $0 | 242 | a | |||
Reporting Subtotal | 135,217 | $14,806,673 | $74,866,304 | 242 | |||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | ||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | ||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | e | |||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | |||||||||||||||||
1) Records of Operating Parameter Values | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 1,040 | 20,800 | 2,080 | 1,040 | $2,619,313 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 1,040 | 15,600 | 1,560.0 | 780.0 | $1,964,485 | $0 | 0 | c,n | |||
3) Records of Stack Tests | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 1,040 | 2,080 | 208.0 | 104.0 | $261,931 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 1,040 | 2,080 | 208.0 | 104.0 | $261,931 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 4 | 1,040 | 4,160 | 416.0 | 208.0 | $523,863 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 12 | 6 | 1,040 | 6,240 | 624.0 | 312.0 | $785,794 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 61 | 2,440 | 244 | 122 | $307,266 | $0 | 0 | f | |||
F. Time for Audits | na | ||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 61,410 | $6,724,582 | $0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Totals | 196,627 | $21,531,255 | $74,866,304 | 242 | |||||||||||||
a The burden on existing sources to refamiliarize themselves with the rule requirements is assumed at 10 hours. | |||||||||||||||||
b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional. Based on the distribution of facilities with affected boilers or process heaters, 88% of facilities are in the industrial sector while the remaining 12% of facilities are in the commercial sector. | |||||||||||||||||
c It is assumed that the affected existing units have conducted an audit, developed an initial site-specific testing and monitoring plan, and submitted initial notifications following the compliance date of January 31, 2016. It is assumed that all existing units are submitting semi-annual reports and conducting the required recordkeeping. | |||||||||||||||||
d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. | |||||||||||||||||
f For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes half of respondents will conduct training each year. | |||||||||||||||||
e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | |||||||||||||||||
g Existing large solid units are expected to determine compliance through stack testing and not fuel analysis | |||||||||||||||||
h Units not equipped with PM CPMS wil perform stack testing for PM. | |||||||||||||||||
i Annual testing is based on the average number of existing units. | |||||||||||||||||
j Only applies to large solid fuel boilers, because solid fuel boilers may fire a mix of non-homogeneous fuels. Assumed all solid fuel units would perform a repeat stack test. | |||||||||||||||||
k Tune-ups are required as work practice standards in lieu of dioxin/furan testing. While the rule provides flexibility to conduct less frequent tune-ups for large units that have a continuous oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air to fuel ratio, the number of units with this configuration is unknown and the ICR conservatively assumes all large units will conduct tune-ups annually. | |||||||||||||||||
L PM CPMS is only required for coal boilers, biomass boilers which are not 100% biomass, and residual oil boilers which are >= 250 mmBtu/hr that were construction prior to June 4, 2010. This affects approximately 207 units. | |||||||||||||||||
m Estimated number of units expected to require each type of parameter monitoring are consistent with the estimated number of units expected to install controls, as outlined in the memorandum: "Revised (November 2011) Methodology for Estimating Cost and Emissions Impacts for Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants – Major Source." Small edits to the MACT floor dataset were made after the impacts analysis and ICR burden estimates were prepared. These edits are not reflected in the ICR or impacts analysis, but the changes are incorporated into the burden estimates for the final rule. | |||||||||||||||||
n Includes enhanced recordkeeping provisions for demonstration of compliance with the alternative definition of "startup" (paragraph (2) of the definition) that document when useful thermal energy is provided, what fuels are used during startup, | |||||||||||||||||
parametric monitoring data to verify relevant controls are engaged, and the time when PM controls are engaged. It is assumed that no one is using the compliance alternatives at this time. |
Table 2.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | |||||||||||||||||
Existing Large Liquid Fuel Units | |||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Stack Testing and Fuel Analysis Cost Per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year [(B+C+D)xExG] | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | |||
1. Applications | na | ||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | ||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 10 | 66 | 660 | 66 | 33 | $83,113 | $0 | 66 | a | |||
B. Required Activities | |||||||||||||||||
1. Conduct Energy Audit | |||||||||||||||||
a) Commerical | 20 | $854 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | |||
b) Industrial | 20 | $18,292 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | |||
2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,h | |||
3. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4. Initial Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
5. Initial Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,i | |||
6. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 570 | 6,840 | 684 | 342 | $861,351 | $2,850,000 | 0 | c,h,j | |||
7. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j | |||
8. Annual Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j | |||
9. Annual Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 570 | 6,840 | 684 | 342 | $861,351 | $3,990,000 | 0 | c,j | |||
10. Repeat Stack Test and Report if Switch Fuels (for Hg and HCl) |
24 | $0 | $16,000 | $0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,f | |||
11. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,g | |||
12. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 570 | 34,200 | 3,420 | 1,710 | $4,306,755 | $2,736,000 | 0 | c,g | |||
13. Annual Tune-up | 12 | $0 | $2,875 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 570 | 6,840 | 684 | 342 | $861,351 | $1,638,750 | 0 | c,L | |||
14. Continuous Parameter Monitoring | n | ||||||||||||||||
Establish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) | 40 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
Opacity | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $14,700 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 300 | 30 | 15.0 | $37,779 | $441,000 | 0 | c | |||
PM (only sources greater than 250 mmBtu/hr) | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $158,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,m | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $56,100 | 1 | 10 | 21 | 210 | 21 | 10.5 | $26,445 | $1,178,100 | 0 | c,m | |||
O2 | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $8,523 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,n | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $1,436 | 1 | 10 | 316 | 3,160 | 316 | 158 | $397,934 | $453,776 | 0 | c,n | |||
Scrubber System Monitoring and Operation (for units with wet scrubbers) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $24,300 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,n | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $5,600 | 1 | 10 | 271 | 2,710 | 271 | 135.5 | $341,266 | $1,517,600 | 0 | c,n | |||
Bag Leak Detection System Operation (sources that have fabric filters) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $25,500 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,n | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 262 | 2,620 | 262 | 131.0 | $329,933 | $2,541,400 | 0 | c,n | |||
DIFF Monitor | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,500 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,n | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 28 | 280 | 28 | 14 | $35,260 | $271,600 | 0 | c,n | |||
Carbon Injection Monitoring System (all sources that use ACI to control Hg) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $115,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,n | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 80 | 8 | 4 | $10,074 | $77,600 | 0 | c,n | |||
C. Create Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | |||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4) Semi-annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 40 | 66 | 2,640 | 264 | 132 | $332,451 | $0 | 132 | c | |||
Reporting Subtotal | 77,487 | $8,485,062 | $17,695,826 | 132 | |||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | ||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | ||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | e | |||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | |||||||||||||||||
1) Records of Operating Parameter Values | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 570 | 11,400 | 1,140 | 570 | $1,435,585 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 570 | 8,550 | 855 | 428 | $1,076,689 | $0 | 0 | c,o | |||
3) Records of Stack Tests | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 570 | 1,140 | 114 | 57 | $143,558 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 570 | 1,140 | 114 | 57 | $143,558 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 4 | 570 | 2,280 | 228 | 114 | $287,117 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 12 | 6 | 570 | 3,420 | 342 | 171 | $430,675 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 33 | 1,320 | 132 | 66 | $166,226 | $0 | 0 | k | |||
F. Time for Audits | na | ||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 33,638 | $3,683,409 | $0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Totals | 111,125 | $12,168,471 | $17,695,826 | 132 | |||||||||||||
a The burden on existing sources to refamiliarize themselves with the rule requirements is assumed at 10 hours. | |||||||||||||||||
b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional. Based on the distribution of facilities with affected boilers or process heaters, 88% of facilities are in the industrial sector while the remaining 12% of facilities are in the commercial sector. | |||||||||||||||||
c It is assumed that the affected existing units have conducted an audit, developed an initial site-specific testing and monitoring plan, and submitted initial notifications following the compliance date of January 31, 2016. It is assumed that all existing units are submitting semi-annual reports and conducting the required recordkeeping. | |||||||||||||||||
d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. | |||||||||||||||||
e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | |||||||||||||||||
f Only applies to large solid fuel boilers, because solid fuel boilers may fire a mix of non-homogeneous fuels. Assumed zero respondents for liquid and gas units. | |||||||||||||||||
g Existing large liquid units are expected to determine compliance for Hg and HCl through fuel analysis not stack testing. | |||||||||||||||||
h Units not equipped with PM CPMS wil perform stack testing for PM. | |||||||||||||||||
j Annual testing is based on the number of existing units in the three years following promulgation of the November 20, 2015 final rule. | |||||||||||||||||
k For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes half of respondents will conduct training each year. | |||||||||||||||||
L Tune-ups are required as work practice standards in lieu of dioxin/furan testing. While the rule provides flexibility to conduct less frequent tune-ups for large units that have a continuous oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air to fuel ratio, the number of units with this configuration is unknown and the ICR conservatively assumes all large units will conduct tune-ups annually. | |||||||||||||||||
m PM CPMS is required for coal boilers, biomass boilers which are not 100% biomass, and residual oil boilers which are >= 250 mmBtu/hr | |||||||||||||||||
n Estimated number of units expected to require each type of parameter monitoring are consistent with the estimated number of units expected to install controls, as outlined in the memorandum: "Revised (November 2011) Methodology for Estimating Cost and Emissions Impacts for Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants – Major Source." Small edits to the MACT floor dataset were made after the impacts analysis and ICR burden estimates were prepared. These edits are not reflected in the ICR or impacts analysis, but the changes are incorporated into the burden estimates for the final rule. | |||||||||||||||||
o Includes enhanced recordkeeping provisions for demonstration of compliance with the alternative definition of "startup" (paragraph (2) of the definition) that document when useful thermal energy is provided, what fuels are used during startup, | |||||||||||||||||
parametric monitoring data to verify relevant controls are engaged, and the time when PM controls are engaged. It is assumed that no one is using the compliance alternatives at this time. |
Table 3.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | |||||||||||||||||
Existing Large Gas Fuel Units | |||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Stack Testing and Fuel Analysis Cost Per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year [(B+C+D)xExG] | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | |||
1. Applications | na | ||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | ||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 10 | 669 | 6,690 | 669 | 335 | $842,462 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
B. Required Activities | |||||||||||||||||
1. Conduct Energy Audit | |||||||||||||||||
a) Commerical | 20 | $854 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | |||
b) Industrial | 20 | $18,292 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | |||
2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
3. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
4. Initial Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
5. Initial Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
6. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 78 | 936 | 93.6 | 46.8 | $117,869 | $390,000 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
7. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
8. Annual Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
9. Annual Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 78 | 936 | 93.6 | 46.8 | $117,869 | $546,000 | 0 | c,j,k | |||
10. Repeat Stack Test and Report if Switch Fuels (for Hg and HCl) |
24 | $0 | $16,000 | $0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,f | |||
11. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,g | |||
12. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 78 | 4,680 | 468 | 234 | $589,345 | $374,400 | 0 | c,g | |||
13. Continuous Parameter Monitoring | o | ||||||||||||||||
Establish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) | 40 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
Opacity | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,h | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $14,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,h | |||
PM (only sources greater than 250 mmBtu/hr) | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $158,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,h | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $56,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,h | |||
O2 | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $8,523 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,o | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $1,436 | 1 | 10 | 78 | 780 | 78 | 39.0 | $98,224 | $112,008 | 0 | c,o | |||
Scrubber System Monitoring and Operation (for units with wet scrubbers) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $24,300 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,o | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $5,600 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 60 | 6 | 3.0 | $7,556 | $33,600 | 0 | c,o | |||
Bag Leak Detection System Operation (sources that have fabric filters) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $25,500 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,o | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,o | |||
14. Annual Tune-up | 12 | $0 | $2,875 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 5,733 | 68,796 | 6,879.6 | 3,439.8 | $8,663,377 | $16,482,375 | 0 | c,k | |||
15. Mercury Fuel Spec Analysis | 5 | $0 | $200 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 387 | 23,220 | 2,322 | 1,161 | $2,924,060 | $928,800 | 0 | c,i | |||
C. Create Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | |||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4) Annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 660 | 13,200 | 1,320 | 660 | $1,662,256 | $0 | 660 | c, L | |||
5) Semi-annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 40 | 9 | 360 | 36 | 18 | $45,334 | $0 | 18 | c, L | |||
6) Notification of Alternative Fuel Use | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 852 | 4,260 | 426.0 | 213.0 | $536,455 | $0 | 852 | c,m | |||
Reporting Subtotal | 142,506 | $15,604,808 | $18,867,183 | 1,530 | |||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | ||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | ||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | e | |||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | |||||||||||||||||
1) Records of Operating Parameter Values | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 78 | 1,560 | 156 | 78 | $196,448 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 78 | 1,170 | 117 | 59 | $147,336 | $0 | 0 | c,p | |||
3) Records of Stack Tests | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 78 | 156 | 15.6 | 7.8 | $19,645 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 78 | 156 | 15.6 | 7.8 | $19,645 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
5) Records of All Annual Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 660 | 1,320 | 132.0 | 66.0 | $166,226 | $0 | 0 | c, L | |||
6) Records of All Semi-Annual Compliance Reports Submitted |
2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 36 | 3.6 | 1.8 | $4,533 | $0 | 0 | c, L | |||
7) Records of Monthly Fuel Use | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 12 | 6 | 78 | 468 | 46.8 | 23.4 | $58,935 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
8) Records of Annual Tune-up | 0.25 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 0.25 | 5,733 | 1,433 | 143.3 | 71.7 | $180,487 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 335 | 13,400 | 1,340 | 670 | $1,687,442 | $0 | 0 | n | |||
F. Time for Audits | na | ||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 22,654 | $2,480,697 | $0 | ||||||||||||||
Totals | 165,160 | $18,085,505 | $18,867,183 | 1,530 | |||||||||||||
a The burden on existing sources to refamiliarize themselves with the rule requirements is assumed at 10 hours. | |||||||||||||||||
b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional. Based on the distribution of facilities with affected boilers or process heaters, 87.4% of facilities are in the industrial sector while the remaining 12.6% of facilities are in the commercial sector. | |||||||||||||||||
c It is assumed that the affected existing units have conducted an audit, developed an initial site-specific testing and monitoring plan, and submitted initial notifications following the compliance date of January 31, 2016. It is assumed that all existing units are submitting semi-annual reports and conducting the required recordkeeping. | |||||||||||||||||
d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. | |||||||||||||||||
e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | |||||||||||||||||
f Only applies to large solid fuel boilers, because solid fuel boilers may fire a mix of non-homogeneous fuels. Assumed zero respondents for liquid and gas units. | |||||||||||||||||
g Existing large gas 2 units are expected to determine compliance through stack testing. | |||||||||||||||||
h Gas units are exempt from PM CPMS and opacity monitoring. | |||||||||||||||||
i Number based on units which reported firing fuels other than natural or refinery gas. | |||||||||||||||||
j The units firing other process gases other than natural gas, refinery gases or other on-spec gas 1 fuels have limits for PM, HCl, Hg, and CO and are subject to testing and monitoring requirements for each pollutant. | |||||||||||||||||
k The recordkeeping and reporting requirements for natural gas fired units is to conduct an annual tune-up and document that the tune-up was completed. The documentation does not need to be submitted as a report unless requested by the Administrator. While the rule provides flexibility to conduct less frequent tune-ups for large units that have a continuous oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air to fuel ratio, the number of units with this configuration is unknown and the ICR conservatively assumes all large units will conduct tune-ups annually. | |||||||||||||||||
L Only facilities with process gas (gas 2 units) subject to numerical emission limits are expected to be required to submit semi-annual compliance reports. Natural gas and refinery gas units are required to submit reports annually. | |||||||||||||||||
m Number based on 17.8% of the large gas 1 units using liquid instead of gas at some point. | |||||||||||||||||
n For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes half of respondents will conduct training each year. | |||||||||||||||||
o Estimated number of units expected to require each type of parameter monitoring are consistent with the estimated number of units expected to install controls, as outlined in the memorandum: "Revised (November 2011) Methodology for Estimating Cost and Emissions Impacts for Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants – Major Source." Small edits to the MACT floor dataset were made after the impacts analysis and ICR burden estimates were prepared. These edits are not reflected in the ICR or impacts analysis, but the changes are incorporated into the burden estimates for the final rule. | |||||||||||||||||
p Includes enhanced recordkeeping provisions for demonstration of compliance with the alternative definition of "startup" (paragraph (2) of the definition) that document when useful thermal energy is provided, what fuels are used during startup, | |||||||||||||||||
parametric monitoring data to verify relevant controls are engaged, and the time when PM controls are engaged. It is assumed that no one is using the compliance alternatives at this time. |
Table 4.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | |||||||||||||||||
New Large Solid Fuel Units | |||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Stack Testing and Fuel Analysis Cost Per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year [(B+C+D)xExG] | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | |||
1. Applications | na | ||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | ||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 3 | 120 | 12 | 6 | $15,111 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
B. Required Activities | |||||||||||||||||
1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 26 | 312 | 31.2 | 15.6 | $39,290 | $130,000 | 0 | a | |||
2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 26 | 312 | 31.2 | 15.6 | $39,290 | $208,000 | 0 | a | |||
3. Initial Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 26 | 312 | 31.2 | 15.6 | $39,290 | $208,000 | 0 | a | |||
4. Initial Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 26 | 312 | 31.2 | 15.6 | $39,290 | $182,000 | 0 | a | |||
5. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
6. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
7. Annual Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
8. Annual Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
9. Repeat Stack Test and Report if Switch Fuels (for Hg and HCl) |
24 | $0 | $16,000 | $0 | 1 | 24 | 26 | 624 | 62.4 | 31.2 | $78,579 | $416,000 | 0 | a,d | |||
10. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a,e | |||
11. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a,e | |||
12. Annual Tune-up | 12 | $0 | $2,875 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 26 | 312 | 31.2 | 15.6 | $39,290 | $74,750 | 0 | a,g | |||
13. Continuous Parameter Monitoring | i | ||||||||||||||||
Establish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) | 40 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 3 | 120 | 12 | 6 | $15,111 | $0 | 0 | a | ||||
Opacity | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,100 | 1 | 10 | 26 | 260 | 26 | 13 | $32,741 | $1,120,600 | 0 | a | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $14,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
PM (only sources greater than 250 mmBtu/hr) | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $158,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a,h | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $56,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a,h | |||
O2 | |||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $8,523 | 1 | 10 | 26 | 260 | 26 | 13 | $32,741 | $221,598 | 0 | a | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $1,436 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
Scrubber System Monitoring and Operation (for units with wet scrubbers) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $24,300 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $5,600 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
Bag Leak Detection System Operation (sources that have fabric filters) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $25,500 | 1 | 10 | 26 | 260 | 26 | 13 | $32,741 | $663,000 | 0 | a | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
Carbon Injection Monitoring System (all sources that use ACI to control Hg) |
|||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $115,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
C. Create Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | |||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | $756 | $0 | 3 | b | |||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 24 | 2.4 | 1.2 | $3,022 | $0 | 3 | b | |||
3) Semi-annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 40 | 3 | 120 | 12 | 6 | $15,111 | $0 | 6 | b | |||
Reporting Subtotal | 3,857 | $422,364 | $3,223,948 | 12 | |||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | ||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | ||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | c | |||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | |||||||||||||||||
1) Records of Operating Parameter Values | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 26 | 520 | 52 | 26 | $65,483 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 26 | 390 | 39 | 20 | $49,112 | $0 | 0 | a, j | |||
3) Records of Stack Tests | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 52 | 5.2 | 2.6 | $6,548 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 52 | 5.2 | 2.6 | $6,548 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 4 | 26 | 104 | 10.4 | 5.2 | $13,097 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 12 | 6 | 26 | 156 | 15.6 | 7.8 | $19,645 | $0 | 0 | a,g | |||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 3 | 120 | 12 | 6 | $15,111 | $0 | 0 | f | |||
F. Time for Audits | na | ||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 1,603 | $175,544 | $0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Totals | 5,460 | $597,909 | $3,223,948 | 12 | |||||||||||||
a In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers and facilities required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers and facilities is each divided by 3. | |||||||||||||||||
b Assumed reporting activities would start the first year a boiler is applicable to rule. | |||||||||||||||||
c Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | |||||||||||||||||
d Only applies to large solid fuel boilers, because solid fuel boilers may fire a mix of non-homogeneous fuels. Assumed all solid fuel units would perform a repeat stack test. | |||||||||||||||||
e Existing large solid units are expected to determine compliance through stack testing and not fuel analysis | |||||||||||||||||
f For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes all new respondents will conduct training. | |||||||||||||||||
g Tune-ups are required as work practice standards in lieu of dioxin/furan testing. While the rule provides flexibility to conduct less frequent tune-ups for large units that have a continuous oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air to fuel ratio, the number of units with this configuration is unknown and the ICR conservatively assumes all large units will conduct tune-ups annually. | |||||||||||||||||
h PM CPMS is required for coal boilers, biomass boilers which are not 100% biomass, and residual oil boilers which are >= 250 mmBtu/hr. It was assumed all new solid fuel boilers are firing 100% biomass. | |||||||||||||||||
i Estimated number of units expected to require each type of parameter monitoring are consistent with the estimated number of units expected to install controls, as outlined in the memorandum: "Revised (November 2011) Methodology for Estimating Cost and Emissions Impacts for Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants – Major Source." Small edits to the MACT floor dataset were made after the impacts analysis and ICR burden estimates were prepared. These edits are not reflected in the ICR or impacts analysis, but the changes are incorporated into the burden estimates for the final rule. | |||||||||||||||||
j Includes enhanced recordkeeping provisions for demonstration of compliance with the alternative definition of "startup" (paragraph (2) of the definition) that document when useful thermal energy is provided, what fuels are used during startup, | |||||||||||||||||
parametric monitoring data to verify relevant controls are engaged, and the time when PM controls are engaged. It is assumed that no one is using the compliance alternatives at this time. |
Table 5.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | ||||||||||||||||
New Large Liquid Fuel Units | ||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Stack Testing and Fuel Analysis Cost Per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year [(B+C+D)xExG] | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | ||
1. Applications | na | |||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | |||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | ||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
B. Required Activities | ||||||||||||||||
1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
3. Initial Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
4. Initial Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
5. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
6. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
7. Annual Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
8. Annual Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
9. Repeat Stack Test and Report if Switch Fuels (for Hg and HCl) |
24 | $0 | $16,000 | $0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
10. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
11. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
12. Annual Tune-up | 12 | $0 | $2,875 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
13. Continuous Parameter Monitoring | ||||||||||||||||
Establish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) | 40 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | ||||
Opacity | 0 | |||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $14,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
PM (only sources greater than 250 mmBtu/hr) | ||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $158,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $56,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
O2 | ||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $8,523 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $1,436 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
Scrubber System Monitoring and Operation (for units with wet scrubbers) |
||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $24,300 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $5,600 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
Bag Leak Detection System Operation (sources that have fabric filters) |
||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $25,500 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
Carbon Injection Monitoring System (all sources that use ACI to control Hg) |
||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $115,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
C. Create Information | na | |||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | |||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | ||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
3) Semi-annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
Reporting Subtotal | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | ||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | |||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | |||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | |||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | ||||||||||||||||
1) Records of Operating Parameter Values | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
3) Records of Stack Tests | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
F. Time for Audits | na | |||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Totals | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
a There are no new large liquid units expected to be constructed/reconstructed over the next 5 years |
Table 6.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | ||||||||||||||||
New Large Gas Fuel Units | ||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Stack Testing and Fuel Analysis Cost Per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year [(B+C+D)xExG] | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | ||
1. Applications | na | |||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | |||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | ||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 33 | 1,320 | 132 | 66 | $166,226 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
B. Required Activities | ||||||||||||||||
1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | e | ||
2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | e | ||
3. Initial Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | e | ||
4. Initial Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | e | ||
6. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) | 12 | $0 | $5,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
7. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
8. Annual Stack Test and Report (for HCl) | 12 | $0 | $8,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
9. Annual Stack Test and Report (for CO) | 12 | $0 | $7,000 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
11. Repeat Stack Test and Report if Switch Fuels (for Hg and HCl) |
24 | $0 | $16,000 | $0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a,e | ||
12. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a,f | ||
13. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury and HCL Content | 5 | $0 | $400 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a,f | ||
14. Continuous Parameter Monitoring | j | |||||||||||||||
Establish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) | 40 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
Opacity | ||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $43,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $14,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
PM (only sources greater than 250 mmBtu/hr) | ||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $158,000 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $56,100 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
O2 | ||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $8,523 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $1,436 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
Scrubber System Monitoring and Operation (for units with wet scrubbers) |
||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $24,300 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $5,600 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
Bag Leak Detection System Operation (sources that have fabric filters) |
||||||||||||||||
a) initial | 10 | $0 | $0 | $25,500 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
b) annual | 10 | $0 | $0 | $9,700 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
15. Annual Tune-up | 12 | $0 | $2,875 | $0 | 1 | 12 | 261 | 3,132 | 313 | 157 | $394,408 | $750,375 | 0 | c | ||
16. Mercury Fuel Spec Analysis | 5 | $0 | $200 | $0 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | h | ||
C. Create Information | na | |||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | |||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | ||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 33 | 66 | 6.6 | 3.3 | $8,311 | $0 | 33 | a | ||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 33 | 264 | 26.4 | 13.2 | $33,245 | $0 | 33 | a | ||
3) Annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 33 | 660 | 66 | 33 | $83,113 | $0 | 33 | a, e | ||
4) Semi-annual Compliance Report | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a, e | ||
5) Notification of Alternative Fuel Use | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | i | ||
Reporting Subtotal | 6,258 | $685,303 | $750,375 | 99 | ||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | ||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | |||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | |||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | d | ||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | ||||||||||||||||
1) Records of Operating Parameter Values | 20 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
3) Records of Stack Tests | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
5) Records of All Annual Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 4 | 33 | 132 | 13.2 | 6.6 | $16,623 | $0 | 0 | a, e | ||
6) Records of All Semi-Annual Compliance Reports Submitted |
2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a, e | ||
7) Records of Monthly Fuel Use | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 12 | 6 | 261 | 1,566 | 157 | 78.3 | $197,204 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
8) Records of Annual Tune-up | 0.25 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 0.25 | 261 | 65 | 6.53 | 3.26 | $8,217 | $0 | 261 | c | ||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 33 | 1,320 | 132 | 66 | $166,226 | $0 | 0 | g | ||
F. Time for Audits | na | |||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 3,546 | $388,269 | $0 | |||||||||||||
Totals | 9,804 | $1,073,572 | $750,375 | 99 | ||||||||||||
a In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers and facilities required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers and facilities is each divided by 3. | ||||||||||||||||
b A one-time requirement. | ||||||||||||||||
c Energy Audits are a requirement for existing units only. | ||||||||||||||||
d Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule as part of their operations. No new record system would be required. | ||||||||||||||||
e Only facilities with process gas (gas 2 units) subject to numerical emission limits are expected to be required to submit semi-annual compliance reports and conduct testing and monitoring (There will not be any new process gas units). Natural gas and refinery gas units are required to submit reports annually and conduct a tune-up. While the rule provides flexibility to conduct less frequent tune-ups for large units that have a continuous oxygen trim system that maintains an optimum air to fuel ratio, the number of units with this configuration is unknown and the ICR conservatively assumes all large units will conduct tune-ups annually. | ||||||||||||||||
f Process gas units are expected to demonstrate compliance with a stack test instead of a fuel analysis. However no new process gas units were estimated. | ||||||||||||||||
g For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes all new respondents will conduct training. | ||||||||||||||||
h Assume all units will fire natural gas, so fuel spec analysis not necessary. | ||||||||||||||||
i Assumed no units would fire an alternative fuel. | ||||||||||||||||
j Estimated number of units expected to require each type of parameter monitoring are consistent with the estimated number of units expected to install controls, as outlined in the memorandum: "Revised (November 2011) Methodology for Estimating Cost and Emissions Impacts for Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants – Major Source." Small edits to the MACT floor dataset were made after the impacts analysis and ICR burden estimates were prepared. These edits are not reflected in the ICR or impacts analysis, but the changes are incorporated into the burden estimates for the final rule. |
Table 7.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | |||||||||||||||||||
Existing Small and Limited Use Solid Fuel Units | |||||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Annual Tune-Up Cost per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year ((B+C+D)xExG) | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | |||||
1. Applications | na | ||||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | ||||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | |||||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 3 | 1 | $3,148 | $0 | 0 | a | Should this be 5 existing respondents, see year 1 totals in table 3 | ||||
B. Required Activities | |||||||||||||||||||
1. Conduct Energy Audit | |||||||||||||||||||
a) Commerical | 20 | $854 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b,c, d | |||||
b) Industrial | 20 | $18,292 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b,c, d | |||||
2. Biennual Tune-Up | 12 | $0 | $2,228 | $0 | 0.5 | 6 | 44 | 264 | 26.4 | 13.2 | $33,245 | $98,032 | 0 | c,i | |||||
C. Create Information | na | ||||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | ||||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | |||||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | |||||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||||
3) Biennial Compliance Report | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 5 | 13 | 1.25 | 0.63 | $1,574 | $0 | 3 | f | |||||
4) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | |||||
302 | 30 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||
Reporting Subtotal | 347 | $37,967 | $98,032 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | ||||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | ||||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | e | |||||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | |||||||||||||||||||
1) Records of All Notifications and Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0.50 | 0.25 | $630 | $0 | 0 | c | |||||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | g | |||||
3) Biennial Tune-Up Records | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 44 | 11 | 1.10 | 0.55 | $1,385 | $0 | 0 | c | |||||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 3 | 120 | 12 | 6 | $15,111 | $0 | 0 | h | |||||
F. Time for Audits | na | ||||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 156 | $17,126 | $0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Totals | 503 | $55,094 | $98,032 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
a The burden on existing sources to refamiliarize themselves with the rule requirements is assumed at 5 hours for small units. | |||||||||||||||||||
b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional. Based on the distribution facility NAICS codes in the 2008 combustion unit survey database, 12% of facilities are in the commercial sector while the remaining 88% of facilities are in the industrial sector. | |||||||||||||||||||
d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. It is assumed that all will be industrial facilities since industrial is the vast majority of projected units. | |||||||||||||||||||
e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | |||||||||||||||||||
f Since a tune-up is required biennially, every two years, the compliance reports for small units are also due every two years. Records of the tune-ups will be submitted to the Administrator upon request. | |||||||||||||||||||
g Small units are not required to maintain records on startup, shutdown and malfunction. | |||||||||||||||||||
h For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes half of respondents will conduct training each year. | |||||||||||||||||||
i Assumes a biennial tune-up is conducted on half of all units each year. Some very small boilers (<5mmBtu/hr) or limited use boilers which operate less than 100 hours annually qualify for tune-ups every five years, however they would still incur an initial tune-up. For the time period of this ICR, there will not be a difference in burden associated with biennial vs 5-year tune-ups for existing units. |
Table 8.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | ||||||||||||||||||
Existing Small and Limited Use Liquid Fuel Units | ||||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Annual Tune-Up Cost per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year ((B+C+D)xExG) | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | ||||
1. Applications | na | |||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | |||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 45 | 225 | 23 | 11 | $28,334 | $0 | 0 | a | ||||
B. Required Activities | ||||||||||||||||||
1. Conduct Energy Audit | ||||||||||||||||||
a) Commerical | 20 | $854 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | ||||
b) Industrial | 20 | $18,292 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b, c, d | ||||
2. Biennual Tune-Up | 12 | $0 | $2,228 | $0 | 0.5 | 6 | 385 | 2,310 | 231.0 | 115.5 | $290,895 | $857,780 | 0 | c, f, i | ||||
C. Create Information | na | |||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | |||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | ||||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
3) Biennial Compliance Report | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 45 | 113 | 11.3 | 5.6 | $14,167 | $0 | 23 | c, f | ||||
4) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
Reporting Subtotal | 3,045 | $333,396 | $857,780 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | |||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | |||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | e | ||||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | ||||||||||||||||||
1) Records of All Notifications and Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 1 | 45 | 45 | 4.5 | 2.3 | $5,667 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c, g | ||||
3) Biennial Tune-Up Records | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 385 | 96 | 9.6 | 4.8 | $12,121 | $0 | 0 | c, f | ||||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 23 | 920 | 92 | 46 | $115,854 | $0 | 0 | h | ||||
F. Time for Audits | na | |||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 1220 | $133,642 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Totals | 4,265 | $467,037 | $857,780 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
a The burden on existing sources to refamiliarize themselves with the rule requirements is assumed at 5 hours for small units. | ||||||||||||||||||
b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional. Based on the distribution of facilities with affected boilers or process heaters, 88% of facilities are in the industrial sector while the remaining 12% of facilities are in the commercial sector. | ||||||||||||||||||
d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. | ||||||||||||||||||
e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | ||||||||||||||||||
f Since a tune-up is required biennially, every two years, the compliance reports for small units are also due every two years. Records of the tune-ups will be submitted to the Administrator upon request. | ||||||||||||||||||
g Small units are not required to maintain records on startup, shutdown and malfunction. | ||||||||||||||||||
h For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes half of respondents will conduct training each year. | edited footnote | |||||||||||||||||
i Assumes a biennial tune-up is conducted on half of all units each year. Some very small boilers (<5mmBtu/hr) or limited use boilers which operate less than 100 hours annually qualify for tune-ups every five years, however they would still incur an initial tune-up. For the time period of this ICR, there will not be a difference in burden associated with biennial vs 5-year tune-ups for existing units. |
Table 9.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | ||||||||||||||||||
Existing Small and Limited Use Gas Fuel Units | ||||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Emission Test Contractor Hours Per Occurrence | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Annual Tune-Up Cost per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year ((B+C+D)xExG) | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | |||
1. Applications | na | |||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | |||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 1,027 | 5,135 | 514 | 257 | $646,643 | $0 | 0 | a | ||||
B. Required Activities | ||||||||||||||||||
1. Conduct Energy Audit | ||||||||||||||||||
a) Commerical | 20 | $854 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b,c,d | ||||
b) Industrial | 20 | $18,292 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | $0 | $0 | 0 | b,c,d | ||||
2. Biennial Tune-Up | 12 | $0 | $1,580 | $0 | 0.5 | 6 | 8,811 | 52,866 | 5,286.6 | 2,643.3 | $6,657,336 | $13,921,380 | 0 | c,f,i | ||||
C. Create Information | na | |||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | |||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | ||||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
3) Biennial Compliance Report | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1,027 | 2,568 | 256.75 | 128.38 | $323,321 | $0 | 514 | c,f | ||||
4) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
Reporting Subtotal | 69,654 | $7,627,300 | $13,921,380 | 514 | ||||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||
A. Familiarization with Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | |||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | |||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | e | ||||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | ||||||||||||||||||
1) Records of All Notifications and Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1,027 | 1,027 | 102.70 | 51.35 | $129,329 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction | 15 | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | c,g | |||
3) Biennial Tune-Up Records | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 8,811 | 2,203 | 220.28 | 110.14 | $277,389 | $0 | 0 | c,f | ||||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 514 | 20,560 | 2,056 | 1,028 | $2,589,090 | $0 | 0 | h | ||||
F. Time for Audits | na | |||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 27358 | $2,995,808 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Totals | 97,012 | $10,623,108 | $13,921,380 | 514 | ||||||||||||||
a The burden on existing sources to refamiliarize themselves with the rule requirements is assumed at 5 hours for small units. | ||||||||||||||||||
b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional. Based on the distribution of facilities with affected boilers or process heaters, 88% of facilities are in the industrial sector while the remaining 12% of facilities are in the commercial sector. | ||||||||||||||||||
d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. | ||||||||||||||||||
e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | ||||||||||||||||||
f Since a tune-up is required biennially, every two years, the compliance reports for small units are also due every two years. Records of the tune-ups will be submitted to the Administrator upon request. | ||||||||||||||||||
g Small units are not required to maintain records on startup, shutdown and malfunction. | ||||||||||||||||||
h For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes half of respondents will conduct training each year. | edited footnote | |||||||||||||||||
i Assumes a biennial tune-up is conducted on half of all units each year. Some very small boilers (<5mmBtu/hr) or limited use boilers which operate less than 100 hours annually qualify for tune-ups every five years, however they would still incur an initial tune-up. For the time period of this ICR, there will not be a difference in burden associated with biennial vs 5-year tune-ups for existing units. |
Table 10.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) | |||||||||||||||||
New Small Solid Fuel Units | |||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Annual Tune-Up Cost per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year ((B+C+D)xExG) | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | |||
1. Applications | na | ||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | ||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 40 | 4 | 2 | $5,037 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
B. Required Activities | |||||||||||||||||
1. Biennial Tune-Up | 12 | $0 | $2,228 | $0 | 0.5 | 6 | 2 | 12 | 1.2 | 0.6 | $1,511 | $4,456 | 0 | a | |||
C. Create Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | ||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | |||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | $252 | $0 | 1 | a | |||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | $1,007 | $0 | 1 | a | |||
3) Biennial Compliance Report | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.5 | 0.25 | 0.13 | $315 | $0 | 1 | d | |||
Reporting Subtotal | 74.2 | $8,122 | $4,456 | 3 | |||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | ||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | ||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | b | |||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | |||||||||||||||||
1) Records of All Notifications and Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.10 | 0.05 | $126 | $0 | 0 | a | |||
2) Biennial Tune-Up Records | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 2 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.03 | $63 | $0 | 0 | a, d | |||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 40 | 4 | 2 | $5,037 | $0 | 0 | c | |||
F. Time for Audits | na | ||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 47.7 | $5,226 | $0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Totals | 122 | $13,348 | $4,456 | 3 | |||||||||||||
a Assumes one respondent with new small solid units per 3-year period, and that a tune-up is conducted on all units. | |||||||||||||||||
b Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | |||||||||||||||||
c For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. Assumes all new respondents will conduct training. | |||||||||||||||||
d Since a tune-up is required biennially, every two years, the compliance reports for small units are also due every two years. Records of the tune-ups will be submitted to the Administrator upon request. |
Table 11.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost -- NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) – Year 2 | ||||||||||||||||
New Small Liquid Fuel Units | ||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Annual Tune-Up Cost per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year ((B+C+D)xExG) | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | ||
1. Applications | na | |||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | |||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | ||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | a | ||
B. Required Activities | ||||||||||||||||
1. Biennial Tune-Up | 12 | $0 | $2,228 | $0 | 0.5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
C. Create Information | na | |||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | |||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | ||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
3) Biennial Compliance Report | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
Reporting Subtotal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | ||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | |||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | |||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | |||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | ||||||||||||||||
1) Records of All Notifications and Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
2) Biennial Tune-Up Records | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | |||
F. Time for Audits | na | |||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Totals | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
a There are no new small solid units expected to be constructed/reconstructed over the next 3 years. |
Table 12.B.: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost -- NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD) (Renewal) – Year 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
New Small Gas Fuel Units | ||||||||||||||||||
Burden Item | (A) Respondent Hours per Occurrence (Technical hours) | (B) Certified Energy Audit Cost per Occurrence | (C) Annual Tune-Up Cost per Occurrence | (D) Other Non-Labor Costs Per Occurrence | (E) Number of Occurrences Per Respondent Per Year | (F) Technical Hours per Respondent Per Year (A X E) |
(G) Number of Respondents Per Year | (H) Technical Hours per Year @ $99.16 (F X G) | (I) Clerical Hours per Year @ $50.88 (H X 0.1) | (J) Management Hours per Year @ $127.43 (H X .05) | (K) Total Labor Costs Per Year | (L) Total Non-Labor Capital Costs Per Year ((B+C+D)xExG) | (M) Total Number of Responses per Year (E X G) | Footnotes | ||||
1. Applications | na | |||||||||||||||||
2. Surveys and Studies | na | |||||||||||||||||
3. Reporting Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 41 | 1,640 | 164 | 82 | $206,523 | $0 | 0 | a | ||||
B. Required Activities | ||||||||||||||||||
1. Biennial Tune-Up | 12 | $0 | $2,228 | $0 | 0.5 | 6 | 326 | 1,956 | 195.6 | 97.8 | $246,316 | $726,328 | 0 | a,e,f | ||||
C. Create Information | na | |||||||||||||||||
D. Gather Information | na | |||||||||||||||||
E. Report Preparation | ||||||||||||||||||
1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 2 | 41 | 82 | 8.2 | 4.1 | $10,326 | $0 | 41 | a | ||||
2) Notification of Compliance Status | 8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 8 | 41 | 328 | 32.8 | 16.4 | $41,305 | $0 | 41 | a | ||||
3) Biennial Compliance Report | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 41 | 103 | 10.3 | 5.1 | $12,908 | $0 | 21 | d,e | ||||
Reporting Subtotal | 4,725 | 517,377 | 726,328 | 103 | ||||||||||||||
4. Recordkeeping Requirements | ||||||||||||||||||
A. Read and Understand Rule Requirements | Included in 3a | |||||||||||||||||
B. Implement Activities | na | |||||||||||||||||
C. Develop Record System | na | b | ||||||||||||||||
D. Record Information | ||||||||||||||||||
1) Records of All Notifications and Compliance Reports Submitted | 2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 1 | 41 | 41 | 4.1 | 2.1 | $5,163 | $0 | 0 | a | ||||
2) Biennial Tune-Up Records | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 326 | 82 | 8.2 | 4.1 | $10,263 | $0 | 0 | a,e,f | ||||
E. Personnel Training | 40 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 1 | 40 | 41 | 1,640 | 164 | 82 | $206,523 | $0 | 0 | c | ||||
F. Time for Audits | na | |||||||||||||||||
Recordkeeping Subtotal | 2027 | $221,949 | $0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Totals | 6,752 | $739,326 | $726,328 | 103 | ||||||||||||||
a In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers and facilities required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers and facilities is each divided by 3. | ||||||||||||||||||
b Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required. | ||||||||||||||||||
c For on-going training activities to keep personnel updated in order to implement compliance activities. | ||||||||||||||||||
d Since a tune-up is required biennially, every two years, the compliance reports for small units are also due every two years. Records of the tune-ups will be submitted to the Administrator upon request. | ||||||||||||||||||
e Assumes for boilers which performed a tune-up in year 1, the biennial tune-up would also occur in year 3. | ||||||||||||||||||
f Very small boilers qualify for tune-ups every five years, however they would still incur an initial tune-up when they come online. For those boilers in year 1 which were performing their initial five-year tune-up, a tune-up in year 3 is not necessary. Four boilers would qualify for 5-year tune-ups and are thus not applicable to tune-ups in year 3. |
Annual Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs | |||||
(A) Boiler Type |
(B) Number of Respondents (facilities) |
(C) Annual Capital/Startup Cost |
(D) Annual O&M |
(E) Annual O&M and Annualized Capital Costs |
|
Existing Large Solid Units | 121 | $0 | $74,866,304 | $74,866,304 | |
New Large Solid Units | 3 | $2,005,198 | $1,218,750 | $3,223,948 | |
Existing Small and Limited Use Solid Units | 5 | $0 | $98,032 | $98,032 | |
New Small Solid Units | 1 | $0 | $4,456 | $4,456 | |
Existing Large Liquid Units | 66 | $0 | $17,695,826 | $17,695,826 | |
New Large Liquid Units | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Existing Small and Limited Use Liquid Units | 45 | $0 | $857,780 | $857,780 | |
New Small Liquid Units | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Existing Large Gaseous Units | 669 | $0 | $18,867,183 | $18,867,183 | |
New Large Gaseous Units | 33 | $0 | $750,375 | $750,375 | |
Existing Small and Limited Use Gaseous Units | 1027 | $0 | $13,921,380 | $13,921,380 | |
New Small Gaseous Units | 41 | $0 | $726,328 | $726,328 | |
Total | 2,012 | $2,005,198 | $129,006,414 | $131,011,612 | |
Total (Rounded) | 2,010 | $2,000,000 | $129,000,000 | $131,000,000 |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |