Burden Calculation Tables

---

Overview

Regulated Sources_Overview
Table 1a
Table 1b
Table 1c
Table 2
Annual Responses
Summary of CEMS Costs_2018
%CEMSCPMSvs.testing

---

Sheet 1: Regulated Sources_Overview

Overview - Number of Facilities and CEMS/CPMS Subject to ICR
Cells highlighted in blue denote values updated by ERG. All other cells use values EPA provided from calculations for the previous ICR.
	Number of Facilities Subject to ICR		2137.06			2137.07			2137.08
			Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
	Existing Facilities		1,244	1,246	1,248	1,250	1,252	1,254	727	727	727
	New Facilities		2	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	0
	Number of CEMS/CPMS Subject to ICR	HAP	2137.06			2137.07			2137.08
			Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3
	A. Existing CEMS/CPMS	PM	N/A	N/A	N/A	1,250	1,252	1,254	254	254	254		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)
		HCl	N/A	N/A	N/A	259	261	263	607	607	607		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)
		Hg	700	700	700	1,101	1,103	1,105	555	555	555		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)
		HF	N/A	N/A	N/A	0	0	0	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (changes to existing inventory per OAQPS)
		Total Existing CEMS/CPMS	700	700	700	2,610	2,616	2,622	1,415	1,415	1,415
	B. New CEMS/CPMS	PM	1,246	1,248	1,250	2	2	2	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)
		HCl	255	257	259	2	2	2	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)
		Hg	397	399	401	2	2	2	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)
		HF	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		Updated formulas to address changes to cells E70:M87 (no new sources)
		Total New CEMS/CPMS	1,898	1,904	1,910	6	6	6	0	0	0
	C. Total CEMS/CPMS in Operation	PM	1,246	1,248	1,250	1,252	1,254	1,256	254	254	254
		HCl	255	257	259	261	263	265	607	607	607
		Hg	1,097	1,099	1,101	1,103	1,105	1,107	555	555	555
		HF	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		Total CEMS/CPMS	2,598	2,604	2,610	2,616	2,622	2,628	1,415	1,415	1,415
	Average CEMS/CPMS per Facility		2.09	2.09	2.09	2.09	2.09	2.09	1.95	1.95	1.95
	Supporting Information
		ICR Year				PM			HCl	SO2	Hg	HF	Notes
			EGU Type	New	Existing	M5, M202	M29	M29	M320	M6A	M30B	M320
	Calculations for 2137.06	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,046	1,048	1,048	0	255	0	1,048		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0		All sources must use M29 for Hg; assumed would use for total HAP metals as well; M320 required for HF and HCl; no SO2 required
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Total	2	1,244	1,246	1,097	0	255	0	1,097	0
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,048	1,050	1,050	0	257	0	1,050		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0		All sources must use M29 for Hg; assumed would use for total HAP metals as well; M320 required for HF and HCl; no SO2 required
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Total	2	1,246	1,248	1,099	0	257	0	1,099	0
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,050	1,052	1,052	0	259	0	1,052		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0		All sources must use M29 for Hg; assumed would use for total HAP metals as well; M320 required for HF and HCl; no SO2 required
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11		M5 and M202 are most expensive for total PM; HCl testing more expensive than SO2; Hg testing is required
			Total	2	1,248	1,250	1,101	0	259	0	1,101	0
	Calculations for 2137.07	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,052	1,054	1,054	0	261	0	1,054
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11
			Total	2	1,250	1,252	1,103	0	261	0	1,103	0
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,054	1,056	1,056	0	263	0	1,056
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11
			Total	2	1,252	1,254	1,105	0	263	0	1,105	0
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	2	1,056	1,058	1,058	0	265	0	1,058
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	36	36	36	0	0	0	36
			IGCC	0	2	2	2		0		2
			liq oil-fired	0	149	149	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	11	11	11	0	0	0	11
			Total	2	1,254	1,256	1,107	0	265	0	1,107	0
	Calculations for 2137.08	Year 1	Coal-fired >8,300	0	630	227	227	0	580	0	529		Updated existing unit counts based on data provided by OAQPS for RTR, with no new units for next 3 year prd
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	26	22	22	0	20	0	22		Revised # of units with CEMS/CPMS based on data provided by OAQPS, see %CEMSCPMSvstesting tab
			IGCC	0	3	0	0		0		0
			liq oil-fired	0	60	4	0	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	8	1	1	0	7	0	4
			Total	0	727	254	250	0	607	0	555	0
		Year 2	Coal-fired >8,300	0	630	227	227	0	580	0	529
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	26	22	22	0	20	0	22
			IGCC	0	3	0	0	0	0		0
			liq oil-fired	0	60	4	4	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	8	1	1	0	7	0	4
			Total	0	727	254	254	0	607	0	555	0
		Year 3	Coal-fired >8,300	0	630	227	227	0	580	0	529
			Coal-fired <8,300	0	26	22	22	0	20	0	22
			IGCC	0	3	0	0		0		0
			liq oil-fired	0	60	4	4	0	0		0
			solid oil-fired	0	8	1	1	0	7	0	4
			Total	0	727	254	254	0	607	0	555	0

---

Sheet 2: Table 1a

Table 1a: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Private Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU) (Renewal)
Cells highlighted in blue denote values updated by ERG. All other cells use values EPA provided from calculations for the previous ICR.
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0	Removed/revised all fields that applied only to new respondents
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	268	268	13.4	26.8	$33,748.86	Updated # of respondents to # of footprints. Included familiarization burden since actual report submittals are due less often than quarterly
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Initial Annual performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202) c	27.8	1	27.8	407	11,313	566	1,131	1,424,577	Updated to # of units conducting testing by pollutant
			Initial Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	100	2,647	132	265	333,367	Updated to # of units conducting testing by pollutant
			Initial Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	143	3,985	199	398	501,801	Updated to # of units conducting testing by pollutant
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	Tracy Curtis: Updated to # of HCl/SO2 CEMS, assumes that hourly estimates apply on a unit basis. Note that data provided by OAQPS broke down CEMS for HCl/SO2, CPMS for Hg and PM 505	5,048	252	505	$635,694.46	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	505	73,702	3,685.1	7,370.2	$9,281,139.06	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	505	46,063	2,303.17	4,606.3	$5,800,711.91	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	505	7,067	353.4	706.7	$889,972.24	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
		New sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	26.8	268	13.4	26.8	$33,748.86	Updated to based on 10% of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	268	40,200	2,010	4,020	$5,062,329.72	Updated to based on # of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	220	4,397	220	440	553,698	Updated to based on # of units estimated to conduct testing, assumes 20 hrs/plan/per unit.
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	22	110	5	11	13,842
		New sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								224,328			$24,564,630
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Tracy Curtis: We are only assuming 10% of respondents will be reporting SSM in line 37, have adjusted the records of CEMS malfunctions accordingly. Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	26.8	322	16.1	32.2	$40,498.64	Updated to based on # of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	268	3,216	160.8	321.6	$404,986.38	Updated to based on # of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	268	6,432	321.6	643.2	$809,972.76	Updated to based on # of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
		New sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								11,465			$1,255,458
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								236,000			$25,800,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$86,600,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e											$112,000,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 727 units at 322 existing facilities and no new units per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 268 facilities are owned by private industry.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $112.98 (technical), $149.35 (managerial), and $54.81 (clerical). These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2017, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” They have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c Estimates are based on the number of privately-owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 407 EGUs conducting Method 5 and Method 202 testing, 100 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 143 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 505 privately-owned EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Unloaded	Rate (110%)
				Technical	$112.98	$53.80	2.1
				Managerial	$149.35	$71.12	2.1
				Clerical	$54.81	$26.10	2.1
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing				From MATS analysis November 2011--Stef Johnson
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	Methods 5 and 202	$15,522	407	$6,316,327	updated - # of test is based on # of units testing by pollutant
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	100	$2,050,054	updated - # of test is based on # of units testing by pollutant
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	143	$2,867,628	updated - # of test is based on # of units testing by pollutant
				Total	$55,972		$11,234,009
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new beta gauge PM CEMS	PM	$65,388	0	$0	updated - no new respondents
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$350,434	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$11,234,009
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Tracy Curtis: Number of monitors has been updated based on the % of EGUs conducting CPMS or CEMS monitoring (see the %CEMSCPMSvs.testing tab) Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$11,818	$20,779	$8,902	$41,499	198	$8,223,086	updated to reference annual costs w. recovery from CEMS Cost model as applied to CEMS from existing units; Updated number of monitors based on OAQPS percentage of ERPs using CEMs by pollutant
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	505	$21,008,935	updated to reference annual costs w. recovery from CEMS Cost model as applied to CEMS from existing units; Updated number of monitors based on OAQPS percentage of ERPs using CEMs by pollutant
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	462	$46,177,033	updated to reference annual costs w. recovery from CEMS Cost model as applied to CEMS from existing units; Updated number of monitors based on OAQPS percentage of ERPs using CEMs by pollutant
				Total						$75,409,054

---

Sheet 3: Table 1b

Table 1b: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Public Facilities – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU) (Renewal)
Cells highlighted in blue denote values updated by ERG. All other cells use values EPA provided from calculations for the previous ICR.
Burden Item				A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
				Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
1. Applications				N/A
2. Surveys and studies				N/A
3. Acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems				160.6	1	160.6	0	0	0	0	0	Removed/revised all fields that applied only to new respondents
4. Report requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			1	1	1	54	54	2.7	5.4	$2,911.77	Updated # of respondents to # of footprints. Included familiarization burden since actual report submittals are due less often than quarterly
	B. Required activities
		Existing sources
			Initial Annual performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202) c	27.8	1	27.8	82	2,279	114	228	122,909	Updated to # of units conducting testing by pollutant
			Initial Annual performance test (HCl, Method 320) c	26.4	1	26.4	20	533	27	53	28,762	Updated to # of units conducting testing by pollutant
			Initial Annual performance test (Hg, Method 30B) c	27.8	1	27.8	29	803	40	80	43,294	Updated to # of units conducting testing by pollutant
			CEMS quarterly inspections d	2.5	4	10	102	1,017	51	102	$54,846.10	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests d	0.4	365	146	102	14,850	742.5	1,485.0	$800,753.12	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
			CEMS daily monitoring d	0.25	365	91.25	102	9,281	464.07	928.1	$500,470.70	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications d	14	1	14	102	1,424	71.2	142.4	$76,784.55	Updated to # of units using HCl/SO2 CEMS. Updated to revised # of respondents
		New sources
			Initial performance test (PM, Methods 5 and 202)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (HCl, Method 320)	26.4	1	26.4	0	0	0	0	0
			Initial performance test (Hg, Method 30B)	27.8	1	27.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS quarterly inspections	2.46	4	9.84	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily calibration drift tests	0.12	365	43.8	0	0	0	0	0
			CEMS daily monitoring	0	365	0	0	0	0	0	0
			All CEMS must follow appropriate performance specifications	7.3	365	2664.5	0	0	0	0	0
	C. Create information			See 4B
	D. Gather existing information			See 4E
	E. Write Report
		Existing sources
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	5.4	54	2.7	5.4	$2,911.77	Updated to based on 10% of footprints. Updated based on revised # of respondents
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	54	8,100	405	810	$436,764.96	Updated to based on # of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	44	886	44	89	47,772	Updated to based on # of units estimated to conduct testing, assumes 20 hrs/plan.
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	4	22	1	2	1,194
		New sources
			Initial notification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of CEMS demonstration	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
			Notification of initial performance test	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
			Performance test report	See 4B
			Notification of compliance status	16.5	1	16.5	0	0	0	0	0
			Quality assurance program certification	3	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
			Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	10	1	10	0	0	0	0	0
			Semiannual compliance report	75	2	150	0	0	0	0	0
			Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	0
			Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	5	1	5	0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements								45,200			$2,119,374
5. Recordkeeping requirements
	A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements			See 4A
	B. Plan activities			See 4B
	C. Implement activities			See 4B
	D. Record data			N/A
	E. Time to transmit or disclose information
		Existing sources
			Tracy Curtis: We are only assuming 10% of respondents will be reporting SSM in line 37, have adjusted the records of CEMS malfunctions accordingly. Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	5.4	65	3.2	6.5	$3,494.12	Updated to based on 10% of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	54	648	32.4	64.8	$34,941.20	Updated to based on # of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	54	1,296	64.8	129.6	$69,882.39	Updated to based on # of footprints. Updated to revised # of respondents
		New sources
			Records of CEMS malfunctions (10% of respondents)	1	12	12	0	0	0	0	0
			Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc.	1	12	12	0	0	0	0	0
			Records of monthly fuel use	2	12	24	0	0	0	0	0
	F. Time to train personnel			80	1	80	0	0	0	0	0
	G. Time for audits			N/A
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements								2,310			$108,318
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (ROUNDED) e								48,000			$2,200,000
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (ROUNDED) e											$17,500,000
GRAND TOTAL (ROUNDED) e											$19,700,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 727 units at 322 existing facilities and no new units per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Of these, 54 facilities are owned by private industry.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $112.98 (technical), $149.35 (managerial), and $54.81 (clerical). These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2017, “Table 2. Civilian workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” They have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c Estimates are based on the number of publicly-owned EGUs complying with annual testing requirements for PM, HCl, and Hg, in lieu of CEMS/CPMS monitoring for these pollutants and includes 82 EGUs conducting Method 5 and Method 202 testing, 20 EGUs conducting Method 320 testing, and 29 EGUs conducting Method 30B testing.
d Assumes that 102 publicly-owned EGUs use HCl or SO2 CEMs.
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
			Assumptions and calculation area:
				Respondent Labor Rates	Loaded	Multiplier	Unloaded	Updated to agency rates
				Technical	$48.08	1.6	$30.05
				Managerial	$64.80	1.6	$40.50
				Clerical	$26.02	1.6	$16.26
				Average Annual Capital Costs for Performance Testing				From MATS analysis November 2011--Stef Johnson
			HAP	Test Method	Cost per Test	Number of Tests	Total Cost
			PM	Methods 5 and 202	$15,522	82	$1,272,693	updated - # of test is based on # of units testing by pollutant
			HCl	Method 320	$20,444	20	$413,071	updated - # of test is based on # of units testing by pollutant
			Hg	Method 30B	$20,006	29	$577,806	updated - # of test is based on # of units testing by pollutant
				Total	$55,972		$2,263,569
				Average Annual Capital Costs for CEMS Installation (Labor and Other Direct Costs)
			Equipment	CEM	Cost per Installation	Number of Installations	Total Cost
			new beta gauge PM CEMS	PM	$65,388	0	$0	updated - no new respondents
			new FTIR CEMS	HCl	$111,045	0	$0
			new Hg CEMS	Hg	$174,002	0	$0
				Total	$350,434	0	$0
					Total Capital Cost:		$2,263,569
				Average Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
				CEM	Costs per Monitor				Tracy Curtis: Number of monitors has been updated based on the % of EGUs conducting CPMS or CEMS monitoring (see the %CEMSCPMSvs.testing tab) Number of Monitors	Total Annual Cost
					Labor	Testing	ODC's	Total
				PM	$11,818	$20,779	$8,902	$41,499	40	$1,656,890.49	updated to reference annual costs w. recovery from CEMS Cost model as applied to CEMS from existing units
				HCl	$14,789	$10,932	$15,897	$41,618	102	$4,233,144	updated to reference annual costs w. recovery from CEMS Cost model as applied to CEMS from existing units
				Hg	$19,959	$40,012	$40,035	$100,006	93	$9,304,328	updated to reference annual costs w. recovery from CEMS Cost model as applied to CEMS from existing units
				Total						$15,194,362

---

Sheet 4: Table 1c

Table 1c: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost Breakdown by Affected Sector – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU) (Renewal)
Affected Sector	Number of Responses	Labor Hours			Labor Cost	Capital and O&M Cost	Total Cost
		Reporting	Recordkeeping	Total
Private	1212	224,328	11,465	236,000	$25,800,000	$86,600,000	$112,000,000
Public (State/Local/Tribal)	244	45,200	2,310	47,500	$2,200,000	$17,500,000	$19,700,000
Total (rounded)	1460	270,000	13,800	284,000	$28,000,000	$104,000,000	$132,000,000	195	hrs/response
Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
2011 Final Rule		% by sector	Current		% by sector
Total # facilities:	575		Total # of facilities (May 2017 Inventory):	322		Updated percentage of public/private to be based on number of facilities/footprints
Total private sector:	479	83.3%	Total private sector	268	83.2%
Total public sector:	96	16.7%	Total public sector	54	16.8%
				2.25776397515528	Units per facility (footprint)

---

Sheet 5: Table 2

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU) (Renewal)
Cells highlighted in blue denote values updated by ERG. All other cells use values EPA provided from calculations for the previous ICR.
Burden Item	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H
	Technical person-hours per occurrence	No. of occurrences per respondent per year	Technical person-hours per respondent per year (AxB)	Respondents per year a	Technical hours per year (CxD)	Management hours per year (Ex0.05)	Clerical hours per year (Ex0.10)	Total cost per year ($) b
Observe initial performance test c	24	1	24	0	0	0	0	0	Updated to 0 respondents, no new sources
Observe repeat performance test d	24	0.2	4.8	0	0	0	0	0
Review initial notification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of CEMS demonstration	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review notification of initial performance test	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review performance test report	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	0
Review quality assurance program certification	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	8	1	8	32.2	257.6	12.88	25.76	$13,890.20
Review semiannual compliance report	8	1	8	322	2,576	128.8	257.6	$138,902.04
Review notification of compliance status	0.5	1	0.5	0	0	0	0	0
Review site-specific performance evaluation test plan	8	1	8	Tracy Curtis: Updated to add values from Table 1b 264	2,113	106	211	113,944
Review request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0.5	1	0.5	26	13	1	1	712
Travel Expenses e								$400
TOTAL (ROUNDED) f					5,700			$268,000
Footnotes:
a EPA estimates an average of 727 existing facilities and no new facilities per year will be subject to the NESHAP over the next 3 years. Across all existing facilities, EPA estimates there will be a total of 727, 133, and 667 CEMS monitoring for PM, HCl, and Hg, respectively.
b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $48.08 (technical), $64.80 (managerial), and $26.02 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2017 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.
c EPA estimates it will observe 20% of initial performance tests.
d EPA assumes 20% of initial performance tests must be repeated due to failure.
e EPA estimates annual travel expenses to be $400 [(1 person x 1 plant/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 1 plant/year) = $400/year].
f Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
Assumptions and calculation area:
	Agency Labor Rates		Unloaded Labor Rate	Multiplier	Loaded Labor Rate
	GS-12 Step 1	Technical	$30.05	1.6	$48.08
	GS-13 Step 5	Managerial	$40.50	1.6	$64.80
	GS-06 Step 3	Clerical	$16.26	1.6	$26.02
		Travel Expenses
	SALARY TABLE 2011-GS	$400
	Travel Expenses
	Travel Expenses* = (1 person x 1 plant/year x 3 days/plant x $50 per diem) + ($250 round trip/plant x 1 plant/year) = $400/year
Travel Expenses* =		$400
	*Assumes EPA will visit 1 plant per year

---

Sheet 6: Annual Responses

Total Annual Responses
	Total Annual Responses
	(A) Information Collection Activity	(B) Number of Respondents	(C) Number of Responses per year	(D) Number of Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports	(E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
	Existing Sources
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	Tracy Curtis: This is based on # of PM tests/# of units; assuming that a report will cover multiple pollutants. Should other tests be included? 489	1	0	489
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	32.2	1	0	32.2
	Semiannual compliance report	322	2	0	644
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	264	1	0	264
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	26.4	1	0	26
	New Sources
	Initial notification	0	1	0	0
	Notification of CEMS demonstration	0	1	0	0
	Notification of initial performance test	0	1	0	0
	Performance test report	0	1	0	0
	Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0
	Quality assurance program certification	0	1	0	0
	Startup, shutdown, and malfunction report (10% of respondents)	0	1	0	0
	Semiannual compliance report	0	2	0	0
	Site-specific performance evaluation test plan	0	1	0	0
	Request to use alternative monitoring procedure (10% of respondents)	0	1	0	0
	Total Annual Responses				1,456
				Hrs/Response =	195

---

Sheet 7: Summary of CEMS Costs_2018

Summary of CEMS (Hg)					Summary of CEMS (HCl)					Summary of CEMS (PM)
Analyzers		BEFORE	AFTER		Analyzers		BEFORE	AFTER		Analyzers		BEFORE	AFTER
CO		0	0		CO		0	0		CO		0	0
SO2		0	0		SO2		0	0		SO2		0	0
NOX		0	0		NOX		0	0		NOX		0	0
HCl		0	0		HCl		0	1		HCl		0	0
Mercury (and CO2/O2)		0	1		Mercury (and CO2/O2)		0	0		Mercury (and CO2/O2)		0	0
CO2		0	0		CO2		0	0		CO2		0	0
O2		0	0		O2		0	0		O2		0	0
THC		0	0		THC		0	0		THC		0	0
Monitors					Monitors					Monitors
OPACITY		0	0		OPACITY		0	0		OPACITY		0	0
FLOW		0	0		FLOW		0	0		FLOW		0	0
PM (beta gauge)		0	0		PM (beta gauge)		0	0		PM (beta gauge)		0	0
PM (light scattering; insitu)		0	0		PM (light scattering; insitu)		0	0		PM (light scattering; insitu)		0	1
PM (light scattering; extractive)		0	0		PM (light scattering; extractive)		0	0		PM (light scattering; extractive)		0	0
Bag leak detector					Bag leak detector					Bag leak detector
Number of fabric filters to be monitored=		0	0		Number of fabric filters to be monitored=		0	0		Number of fabric filters to be monitored=		0	0
Number of sensors=		0	0		Number of sensors=		0	0		Number of sensors=		0	0
Summary of Costs					Summary of Costs					Summary of Costs
First Costs	Labor	Test	ODCs	Total	First Costs	Labor	Test	ODCs	Total	First Costs	Labor	Test	ODCs	Total
Planning	2,534	0	352	2,886	Planning	2,534	0	352	2,886	Planning	806	0	0	806
Select Equipment	10,941	0	3,067	14,008	Select Equipment	10,941	0	3,067	14,008	Select Equipment	5,357	0	643	6,000
Support Facilities	0	0	19,267	19,267	Support Facilities	0	0	19,267	19,267	Support Facilities	0	0	365	365
Purchase CEMS Hardware	0	0	103,044	103,044	Purchase CEMS Hardware	0	0	48,763	48,763	Purchase CEMS Hardware	0	0	33,432	33,432
Install and Check CEMS	6,762	0	11,979	18,741	Install and Check CEMS	4,818	0	11,979	16,797	Install and Check CEMS	2,419	0	12,019	14,439
Performance Specification Tests	2,244	33,855	628	36,726	Performance Specification Tests	2,129	8,463	503	11,095	Performance Specification Tests	3,639	26,470	693	30,802
QA/QC Plan	2,570	11,981	692	15,244	QA/QC Plan	2,570	11,981	692	15,244	QA/QC Plan	2,306	10,444	692	13,442
	25,052	45,836	139,029	209,917		22,993	20,444	84,622	128,059		14,527	36,914	47,844	99,285
Annual Costs					Annual Costs					Annual Costs
Day-to-Day Activities	11,016	0	1,000	12,016	Day-to-Day Activities	6,018	0	1,000	7,018	Day-to-Day Activities	1,102	0	0	1,102
Annual RATA	885	33,485	0	34,370	Annual RATA	885	8,021	0	8,906	Annual RATA	0	0	0	0
PM Monitor RCA	0	0	0	0	PM Monitor RCA	0	0	0	0	PM Monitor RCA	389	5,692	19	6,099
PM Monitor RRA	0	0	0	0	PM Monitor RRA	0	0	0	0	PM Monitor RRA	816	9,830	50	10,696
Cylinder Gas Audits (ACA/SVA for PM)	1,164	0	15,881	17,045	Cylinder Gas Audits (ACA/SVA for PM)	1,284	0	1,069	2,353	Cylinder Gas Audits (ACA/SVA for PM)	586	0	620	1,206
Recordkeeping and Reporting	1,253	0	160	1,413	Recordkeeping and Reporting	1,253	0	160	1,413	Recordkeeping and Reporting	5,448	0	40	5,488
Annual QA & O&M Review and Update	2,074	0	3,196	5,271	Annual QA & O&M Review and Update	2,074	0	1,618	3,693	Annual QA & O&M Review and Update	1,409	0	1,360	2,769
Capital Recovery	3,567	6,527	19,798	29,892	Capital Recovery	3,274	2,911	12,050	18,236	Capital Recovery	2,069	5,257	6,813	14,138
Total w/o capital recovery	16,392	33,485	20,238	70,114	Total w/o capital recovery	11,515	8,021	3,847	23,382	Total w/o capital recovery	9,749	15,522	2,089	27,360
Total with capital recovery	19,959	40,012	40,035	100,006	Total with capital recovery	14,789	10,932	15,897	41,618	Total with capital recovery	11,818	20,779	8,902	41,499

---

Sheet 8: %CEMSCPMSvs.testing

No. Release Pts	Hg Compliance Method				PM Compliance Method				AG Compliance Method
610	All	Counts	%		All Units	Counts	%		All Units	Counts	%
	Hg CMS*	463	76		PM CMS**	198	32		HCl CEMS	5	1		Average % Units Using CEMS
									SO2 CEMS	498	82		0.636666666666667
	Stack Test	147	24		Stack Test	412	68		Stack Test	107	17		Average % Units Testing
													0.363
	Coal: Bituminous Coal, Subbituminous Coal, Waste Coal - anthracite culm, bituminous gob, fine coal, lignite waste, waste coal
522	C	Counts	%		C	Counts	%		C	Counts	%
	Hg CMS*	441	84		PM CMS**	188	36		HCl CEMS	4	1
									SO2 CEMS	476	91
	Stack Test	81	16		Stack Test	334	64		Stack Test	42	8
	Lignite Coal
23	L	Counts	%		L	Counts	%		L	Counts	%
	Hg CMS*	19	83		PM CMS**	5	22		HCl CEMS	0	0
									SO2 CEMS	18	78
	Stack Test	4	17		Stack Test	18	78		Stack Test	5	22
	IGCC
3	PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%
	Hg CMS*	0	0		PM CMS**	0	0		HCl CEMS	0	0
	Stack Test	3	100		Stack Test	3	100		Stack Test	3	100
	Oil: Oil, Diesel Oil, Residual Oil, Other Oil
56	OIL	Counts	%		OIL	Counts	%		OIL	Counts	%
	Hg CMS*	0	0		PM CMS**	4	7		HCl CEMS	0	0
	Stack Test	56	100		Stack Test	52	93		Stack Test	56	100
	Petroleum Coke
6	PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%		PTC	Counts	%
	Hg CMS*	3	50		PM CMS**	1	17		HCl CEMS	1	17
								6.64	SO2 CEMS	4	66
	Stack Test	3	50		Stack Test	5	83		Stack Test	1	17
	* Hg CEMS or Hg sorbent traps				** PM CEMS or PM CPMS