OMB files this
comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11(c) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act and is withholding approval of this collection at
this time. This OMB action is not an approval to conduct or sponsor
an information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The agency shall examine public comment in response to the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and will include in the supporting
statement of the next ICR, to be submitted to OMB at the final rule
stage, a description of how the agency has responded to any public
comments on the ICR. This action has no effect on any current
approvals.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
03/31/2019
36 Months From Approved
03/31/2020
198
0
198
113,000
0
113,000
754,000
0
754,000
The National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Hydrochloric Acid Production
were proposed on September 18, 2001, promulgated on April 17, 2003,
and most recently amended on April 7, 2006. The NESHAP is codified
at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart NNNNN. Amendments to the NESHAP are
being proposed as a result of the residual risk and technology
review (RTR) required under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The NESHAP
apply to hydrochloric acid production facilities that emit greater
than or equal to 10 tons per year (tpy) of any one hazardous air
pollutant (HAP) or greater than or equal to 25 tpy of any
combination of HAP. Affected sources include new and existing
hydrochloric acid production facilities. The pollutants regulated
are hydrochloric acid (HCl) and chlorine (Cl2). New facilities
include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after
the date of the original proposal (September 18, 2001). This
information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart NNNNN.
This ICR is prepared for
proposed amendments to the NESHAP for Hydrochloric Acid Production
(40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart NNNNN). These amendments: (1) adjust
references to the Part 63 General Provisions (40 CFR, Part 63,
Subpart A) and revise provisions in the NESHAP (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart NNNNN) to remove the SSM exemption and SSM plan and
periodic report requirements; (2) require electronic submittal of
performance test results; and (3) make technical and editorial
changes. Where applicable, adjustments for these amendments are
reflected in Tables 1 and 2 of this ICR. The number of facilities
subject to the standards changed based on consultation with
industry representatives, review of EPA’s ECHO database, and review
of title V permits. Consolidation within the industry reduced the
number of affected facilities to nineteen that are currently
subject to the standards. Costs per labor hour increased due to
increases in labor rates. In addition, the burden estimate for
reading and understanding the rule requirements was adjusted to
reflect the time it would take industry to review the amended rule,
including becoming familiar with the new requirement to
electronically submit performance test results. Burden estimates
were reduced for submitting periodic SSM reports after consultation
with industry representatives. The previous estimate of SSM
frequency was roughly an order of magnitude higher than the actual
frequency, according to industry. The burden estimate for
performance test report submittal was not adjusted to account for
the new requirement that results of performance tests would be
reported electronically through CEDRI using the ERT. The burden
estimate of four hours in the current ICR for paper format
submittal of performance test results is an appropriate estimate
for electronic submittal of performance test results.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.