| NESHAP for Source Categories: Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Acetal Resin; Acrylic and Modacrylic Fiber; Hydrogen Fluoride and Polycarbonate Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY) (Renewal) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.98 |
149.35 |
54.81 |
|
|
|
| Burden Item |
(A)
Person-hours per occurrencea |
(B)
No. of occurrences per source per yearb |
(C)
Person-hours per source per year
(C=AxB) |
(D)
Respondents per yearc |
(E)
Technical person-hours per year
(E=CxD) |
(F)
Management person-hours per year
(Ex0.05) |
(G)
Clerical person-hours per year
(Ex0.1) |
(H)
Cost,$d |
|
|
| 1. Applications |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. Survey and Studies |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3. Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. Familiarize with Rule Requirements e |
See 4A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B. Required Activities for PC, AMF, AR, HF e |
See 4C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C. Create Information for PC, AMF, AR, HF e |
See 4C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D. Gather Information for PC, AMF, AR, HF e |
See 4C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E. Write report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Initial notification requirements for pressure relief devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
4 |
1 |
4 |
Tracy Curtis:
Updated to 0. Any initial notifications for PRDs should be finallzed if there are no new sources.
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| General initial notification requirementse, f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
52 |
1 |
52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
52 |
1 |
52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
52 |
1 |
52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
52 |
1 |
52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Startup, shutdown and malfunction reportsg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Periodic reports h |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
13.5 |
2 |
27 |
3 |
108 |
5.4 |
10.8 |
$13,600.28 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
15.5 |
2 |
31 |
1 |
31 |
1.55 |
3.1 |
$3,903.78 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
8 |
2 |
16 |
2 |
32 |
1.6 |
3.2 |
$4,029.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
8 |
2 |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
$2,014.86 |
|
|
| Leak detection and repair reportingi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
12 |
2 |
24 |
3 |
72 |
3.6 |
7.2 |
$9,066.85 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
12 |
2 |
24 |
1 |
24 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
$3,022.28 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
8 |
2 |
16 |
2 |
32 |
1.6 |
3.2 |
$4,029.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
8 |
2 |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
$2,014.86 |
|
|
| REPORTING SUBTOTAL (Rounded) |
|
|
|
|
388 |
$42,438 |
|
|
| 4. Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A. Familiarize with Rule Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
4 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
12 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
$1,511.14 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
4 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
4 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
$1,007.43 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
4 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| B. Plan activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
40 |
1 |
40 |
3 |
120 |
6 |
12 |
$15,111.42 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
40 |
1 |
40 |
1 |
40 |
2 |
4 |
$5,037.14 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) e |
40 |
1 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) e |
40 |
1 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| C. Implementation activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Material determinations e |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Control equipment inspections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. Tanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
2 |
12 |
24 |
1 |
24 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
$3,022.28 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
2 |
12 |
24 |
2 |
48 |
2.4 |
4.8 |
$6,044.57 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| b. Closed-vent systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
12 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
$1,511.14 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
$1,007.43 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Control equipment leak monitoring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. Cover vented to control device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
$755.57 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| a. Closed vent system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
$755.57 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Control devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. Initial requirements design analysis, performance test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) e |
80 |
1 |
80 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
80 |
1 |
80 |
Tracy Curtis:
Updated to 0. Initial requirements would only apply to new sources.
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) e |
80 |
1 |
80 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) e |
80 |
1 |
80 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| b. Operate and maintain CMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
8 |
12 |
96 |
3 |
288 |
14.4 |
28.8 |
$36,267.41 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
8 |
12 |
96 |
1 |
96 |
4.8 |
9.6 |
$12,089.14 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
8 |
12 |
96 |
2 |
192 |
9.6 |
19.2 |
$24,178.27 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
8 |
12 |
96 |
1 |
96 |
4.8 |
9.6 |
$12,089.14 |
|
|
| Pressure relief devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
$755.57 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Leak detection and repair program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. Initial requirements: Identify all affected streams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Tracy Curtis:
Revised to zero. These are initial requirements, should be one-time activity.
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| General Burden e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| b. Perform monitoring/repairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) j |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tracy Curtis:
Previous ICR assumed O&M costs here (had no labor hours associated). Have removed since this has been pulled into bottom of table.
|
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) j |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tracy Curtis:
Previous ICR assumed O&M costs here (had no labor hours associated). Have removed since this has been pulled into bottom of table.
|
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
16 |
12 |
192 |
2 |
384 |
19.2 |
38.4 |
$48,356.54 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) k |
0.1 |
1092 |
109.2 |
1 |
109.2 |
5.46 |
10.92 |
$13,751.39 |
|
|
| Container vapor tightness certification |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D. Develop Record System |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Develop startup, shutdown, malfunction plane, g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Control equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| General Burden e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Spinning Lines (AMF) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Tracy Curtis:
Updated from 1 to 0. This applied to initial requirements from the Oct 2014 amendments.
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Pressure relief devices e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
<--updated to zero respondents (no new respondents) |
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
<--updated to zero respondents (no new respondents) |
|
| Leak detection and repair program e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
44 |
1 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
<--updated to zero respondents (no new respondents) |
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
44 |
1 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
<--updated to zero respondents (no new respondents) |
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
40 |
1 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
40 |
1 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| E. Record All Information Required by Standards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DWang:
1871.06 had this requirement, but it was taken out (changed to N/A) in 1871.08. I pulled them in from .06. Do you think we should keep them in?
Initial requirements e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
17 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
17 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
17 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
17 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
| Control equipment inspections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
$755.57 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Control equipment monitoring l |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
1 |
52 |
52 |
3 |
156 |
7.8 |
15.6 |
$19,644.85 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
1 |
52 |
52 |
1 |
52 |
2.6 |
5.2 |
$6,548.28 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
1 |
52 |
52 |
2 |
104 |
5.2 |
10.4 |
$13,096.56 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
1 |
52 |
52 |
1 |
52 |
2.6 |
5.2 |
$6,548.28 |
|
|
| Control device CMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
1 |
12 |
12 |
3 |
36 |
1.8 |
3.6 |
$4,533.43 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
1 |
12 |
12 |
1 |
12 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
$1,511.14 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
1 |
12 |
12 |
2 |
24 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
$3,022.28 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
1 |
12 |
12 |
1 |
12 |
0.6 |
1.2 |
$1,511.14 |
|
|
| Pressure relief devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
$755.57 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Leak detection and repair program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
3 |
60 |
3 |
6 |
$7,555.71 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
20 |
1 |
20 |
1 |
20 |
1 |
2 |
$2,518.57 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
16 |
1 |
16 |
2 |
32 |
1.6 |
3.2 |
$4,029.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
16 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
$2,014.86 |
|
|
| F. Time to Train Personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Material determination methods |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Control equipment inspection and monitoring m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
8 |
1 |
8 |
3 |
24 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
$3,022.28 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
8 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
8 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
$1,007.43 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
8 |
1 |
8 |
2 |
16 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
$2,014.86 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
8 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
8 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
$1,007.43 |
|
|
| Leak detection and repair program h, m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Polycarbonates (PC) |
10 |
1 |
10 |
3 |
30 |
1.5 |
3 |
$3,777.86 |
|
|
| Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) |
10 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
10 |
0.5 |
1 |
$1,259.29 |
|
|
| Acetal Resins (AR) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
$503.71 |
|
|
| Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
$251.86 |
|
|
| Container leak tight method |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RECORDKEEPING SUBTOTAL |
|
|
|
|
2,518 |
$275,683 |
|
|
| TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (Rounded)n |
|
|
|
|
2,910 |
$318,000 |
|
|
| TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (Rounded)n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$43,100 |
|
|
| GRAND TOTAL (Rounded)n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$361,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
hr/response |
| N/A = Not Applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a Estimate of burden for each activity, technical hours only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| b Estimate based on average facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| c We have assumed that there are 7 existing sources (3 PC, 1 AMF, 2 AR, and 1 HF) and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| d Costs are rounded and based on the following hourly rates: Technical at $112.98, Management at $149.35, and Clerical at $54.81. These labor rates are based on the June 2017 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June 2017, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group". |
|
|
| e Since there are no new respondents estimated, these requirements do not apply. |
|
|
| f Initial notification requirements include: initial notifications, initial compliance determination, and initial performance tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| g All major sources except for those in the PC and AMF subcategories must submit startup, shutdown, malfunction reports semiannually when actions are taken in the event of a startup, shutdown, or malfunction that are consistent with the source’s SSM plans. Sources can submit this information with the periodic reports. |
|
|
| h The rules requires that all sources submit periodic reports (semiannually or according to the schedule for Title V). |
|
|
| i The standards for equipment leak requires the submittal of an initial report and semiannual reports of leak detection and repair (LDAR) and any changes to the processes, monitoring frequency and initiation of a quality improvement program. These estimates assume sources are submitting the required periodic LDAR information with the semiannual reports. Since there are no new respondents estimated, the requirements for a one-time initial report do not apply. |
|
|
| j Costs for performing monitoring and repairs for the polycarbonates (PC) and acrylic and modacrylic fibers (AMF) categories are accounted for in operation and maintenance costs (i.e. the LDAR program is contracted out instead of conducted in house) (see section 6(b)(iii)). |
|
|
| k Visual inspections are required once per shift with a total of three shifts per day, at seven days per week, for 52 weeks per year. (3x7x52) for a total of 1,092 inspections per year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| l We have assumed that control equipment monitoring should be done on a weekly basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| m We have assumed that there will be some labor hours associated with rule analysis and training per year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| n Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Source Categories: Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Acetal Resin; Acrylic and Modacrylic Fiber; Hydrogen Fluoride and Polycarbonate Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY) (Renewal) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.08 |
64.8 |
26.02 |
|
| Burden Item |
(A)
EPA person-hours per occurrence |
(B)
No. of occurrences per plant per year |
(C)
EPA person-hours per plant per year (C=AxB) |
(D)
Plants per year a |
(E)
Technical person-hours per year (E=CxD) |
(F)
Management person-hours per year (Ex0.05) |
(G)
Clerical person-hours per year (Ex0.1) |
(H)
Agency Cost, $b |
| REPORT REVIEW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Initial Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. Initial notification c |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
| b. Performance test c, d |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
| c. Compliance status e |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
| d. Performance test reports c, d |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
| 2. Periodic Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. Periodic reports |
3 |
2 |
6 |
7 |
42 |
2.1 |
4.2 |
$2,264.72 |
| b. Leak detection and repair reports C, f |
3 |
2 |
6 |
7 |
42 |
2.1 |
4.2 |
$2,264.72 |
| c. Startup, shutdown, malfunction reports c, g |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
| TOTAL (Rounded)h |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
$4,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a We have assumed that there are 7 existing sources (3 PC, 1 AMF, 2 AR, and 1 HF) and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years. |
| b These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2017 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees. |
| c We have assumed there will be no new sources over the next three years of this ICR. Since there are no new respondents estimated, these requirements do not apply. |
| d We have assumed that the Agency will not have additional burden from sources conducting performance tests due to a process change that may or may not result in the source meeting additional requirements. |
| e Since there are no new respondents estimated, these requirements do not apply. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| f The equipment leak standards require the submittal of an initial report and semiannual report of leak detection and repair (LDAR) program experiencing any changes to the processes, monitoring frequency and initiation of a quality improvement program. We have assumed that sources are submitting the required LDAR information with the periodic reports. |
| g All major sources except for those in the PC and AMF subcategories must submit startup, shutdown, malfunction reports semiannually when actions are taken in the event of a startup, shutdown, or malfunction that are consistent with the source’s SSM plans. Since there are no new respondents estimated, the requirements to develop a startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) plan do not apply. These estimates assume that sources are submitting their information on SSM with the periodic report which is submitted on a semiannual basis. |
| h Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |