Attachment E2. Comments on the 60-day FRN

Attachment E2 Federal Register Comments

PUBLIC SUBMISSION #1

As of: 9/15/16 3:34 PM

Received: July 23, 2016

Status: Posted

Posted: August 02, 2016

Tracking No. 1k0-8qx7-iavz

Comments Due: September 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: CDC-2016-0066

National Death Index (NDI) 0920-0215

Comment On: CDC-2016-0066-0001

Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations

Document: CDC-2016-0066-0002

National Death Index (NDI) 0920-0215 Comment from (name)

Submitter Information

Name: JEAN PUBLIEE

General Comment

THIS AGENCY CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO COLLECT HONEST DATA. THE REASONS FOR DEATH ARE

MYRIAD AND THIS AGECY USES DEATHS AS POLITICAL CAPITAL TO PUSH AGENDAS. WHEN

PEOPLE DIE FROM FLU IT IS ALSO BECAUSE OF RESPIRATORY ISSUES, HIV, AND OTHER

THINGS, BUT THIS AGENCY ALWAYS PUTS IT DOWN TO FLU TO TRY TO CONVINCE THE

AMERICAN PUBLIC THAT THEY NEED TO GET SHOTS. THIS AGENCY HAS PUSHED THE NUMBER

OF SHOTS AMERICANS GET FROM VACCINES FROM THEONE WE USED TO GET TO NOW BABIES,

LITTLE KIDS GETTING 60 DOSES OF VAROUIS VACCINES, KIDS ARE DYING FROM THE

VACCINES NOT FROM THE ILLNESSES. MOST CAN SURVIVE FLU AND DONT NEED A VACCINE AT

ALL. THIS AGENCY TURNS COLLECTION OF DEATH AND ILLNESS INTO POLITICAL CAPITAL.

THEY DONT HAVE ACCURATE INFORMATION. WHAT IS LISTED ONT HE DEATH CERTFICIATE IS

NOT ACCURATE. NOBODY HAS DONE AN AUTOPSY. IT IS CONJECTURE. WE THEN GET FED BACK

CONJECTURE BECAUSE NOBODY HAS BOTHERED TO DETERMINE REAL CAUS OF DEATH. THIS

COLLECTGION OF CONJECTURE HAS NO VALIDITY AT ALL IN ANY WAY. COLLECTION OF

CONJECTURE HAS NO PLACE IN USE IN AMERICAN LIFE. IT IS SIMPLY WASTED MONEY. ITS

TIME TO STOP THIS FAKE, INACCURATE COLLECTION OF CONJECTURES ABOUT CAUSES OF

DEATH AND ILLNESS. TESTS NEED TO BE RUN TO BE SURE WHY SOMENE DIED. IT CANT BE

JUST A PART OF SPEECH EAASILY CONJECTURED. THAT IS IMAGINATION, NOT COLLECTION

OF DATE. THIS IS WHAT CDC ENGATES IN. COLLECTION OIF FAKERY. SHUT DOWN THIS

COLLECTION. IT IS NOT ACCURATE. WE NEED TO STOP COLLECTIN INACCURAT FAKE DATA.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION #2

As of: 9/15/16 3:32 PM

Received: July 28, 2016

Status: Posted

Posted: August 02, 2016

Tracking No. 1k0-8r0j-mym1

Comments Due: September 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: CDC-2016-0066

National Death Index (NDI) 0920-0215

Comment On: CDC-2016-0066-0001

Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations

Document: CDC-2016-0066-0003

National Death Index (NDI) 0920-0215 Comment from (name)

Submitter Information

Name: jean publiee

General Comment

this is the most careless collection of information ever. nobody really bothers to determine cause of death so that the casue of death written down is just what is most apparent and has nowhere and nothing to do with the real causes of death. this collection is not worth the paper it is written on. the cdc to make political points turns everything into flu so that it can push vaccines so that there is political activity goin on in this collection of information. t he taxpaeyrs should do away with it. it is a collection of stupid, lying completely inaccurate causes of death. its not worth gouging of tax dollars from American citizens. because of the inaccuracies and because of the political use and manipulation of data, this collection cannot be relied upon at all. see the new Yorker in depth article of what was found when there was an examination of what was written on the data collected. its a collection of misinformation.

Final Forms

What death certificates can tell us, and what they can't.

BY KATHRYN SCHULZ

ShareTweet

2014_04_07

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We have developed a vast, macabre bureaucracy to answer the question of why we die.

We have developed a vast, macabre bureaucracy to answer the question of why we die.

CREDIT ILLUSTRATION FROM OXFORD SCIENCE / GETTY

It starts with a dead body, as so many mysteries do. A middle-aged man is found unconscious and rushed to a hospital. For four days, he lingers in a coma; on the fifth, he dies. The clues are few and dark and point in different directions. The man was a drug addict. He was diabetic. Some of his family members say that he acted strangely the last time they saw him conscious. Others disagree. The lab tests are inconclusive. Everything is inconclusive. If this were a mystery of the Conan Doyle kind, there would be a detective, and there would be a solution. In the event, there is neither. Instead, there is a young doctor, in her first year on the job, and there is a single piece of paper: a death certificate, on which she is meant to record, precisely and for posterity, why this person died.

Not every mystery involves a dead body, but every dead body is a mystery. Death is an assassin with infinite aliases, and the question of what kills us is tremendously complex. It is also tremendously labile. We ask it with clinical curiosity and keen it in private grief; we pose it rhetorically and inquire specifically; we address it to everyone from physicians to philosophers to priests. It is as bare as bone and as reverberant as bell metal: Why do we die?