In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three
years.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
04/30/2022
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
146
0
103
7,248
0
6,700
1,120
0
1,120
The National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Printing, Coating and Dyeing
of Fabrics and Other Textiles (hereafter referred to as the
Printing, Coating and Dyeing Operations NESHAP) were proposed on
July 11, 2002, promulgated on May 29, 2003, and most recently
amended on August 4, 2004. The NESHAP is codified at 40 CFR § Part
63, Subpart OOOO. This supporting statement addresses information
collection activities that will be imposed by the Printing, Coating
and Dyeing Operations NESHAP, including activities to be added
based on the residual risk and technology review (RTR) required
under the Clean Air Act (CAA). As part of the RTR for the Printing,
Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles NESHAP, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is not revising the emission
limit requirements. The EPA is revising the startup, shutdown, and
malfunction (SSM) provisions of the Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) rule and the use of electronic data reporting for
future performance test data submittals, notifications, and
reports. This information is being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO. In general, all NESHAP standards
require initial notifications, performance tests (if sources are
using add-on controls to demonstrate compliance), and periodic
reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They
are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any deviation from an emission limitation (either a
numerical emission limit, an operating limit, or an equipment or
work practice standard), or any period during which the monitoring
system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records
are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all
affected facilities subject to the NESHAP.
There is only a small increase
in the labor hours per respondent in this ICR as compared to the
previous ICR. This situation is due to three considerations: 1)
time in year one to become familiar with the amended rules and
requirements, 2) time in year one to re-evaluating previously
developed SSM record systems, and 3) time in year one to become
familiar with CEDRI and the electronic reporting form for the
semiannual report.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.