• NRC Endorsement of Industry High Frequency Program: Application Guidance

Endorsement of Industry High Frequency Program, Application Guidance.pdf

Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Event

• NRC Endorsement of Industry High Frequency Program: Application Guidance

OMB: 3150-0211

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
September 17, 2015
Mr. Andrew Mauer
Senior Project Manager
Nuclear Energy Institute
1201 F Street NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20004
SUBJECT: ENDORSEMENT OF ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE FINAL
DRAFT REPORT 3002004396, “HIGH FREQUENCY PROGRAM:
APPLICATION GUIDANCE FOR FUNCTIONAL CONFIRMATION AND
FRAGILITY”
Dear Mr. Mauer:
On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to the Nuclear
Energy Institute (NEI) letter1 dated July 30, 2015, with attached Electric Power Research
Institute (EPRI) Report No. 3002004396 entitled, “High Frequency Program: Application
Guidance for Functional Confirmation and Fragility” (hereafter referred to as the High Frequency
Guidance Report). The NEI letter was submitted to support licensee responses to Enclosure 1
of the March 12, 2012, information request2 that was issued pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter).
The 50.54(f) letter was issued as part of the lessons learned from the accident at the Fukushima
Dai-Ichi nuclear facility.
The NRC staff interacted with the stakeholders on the development of the High Frequency
Guidance Report with a focus on applying high frequency seismic test results (EPRI 1025287)
to support completion of high frequency confirmations for sites with re-evaluated seismic hazard
exceedances above 10 Hertz. The High Frequency Guidance Report is the product of
significant interaction between the NRC, NEI, EPRI, and industry stakeholders, at five public
meetings.3 These interactions and the insights gained from the meetings allowed for the
development of this document in an effective and transparent manner. The meetings helped
develop the expectations for how licensees would perform high frequency confirmations.
The NRC staff has reviewed the High Frequency Guidance Report and found the guidance to
be an acceptable method for licensees to use when responding to NRC Requested Information
item (4) in Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter. Licensees may use the High Frequency Guidance
Report in addition to the SPID guidance, as an acceptable approach for responding to the
information requested. Licensees are encouraged to adopt EPRI Report 3002004396 without

1

The letter can be found at Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15223A095.
The 50.54(f) letter is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML12053A340.
3
Public meetings were held on October 27, 2014, February 11, 2015, March 31, 2015, May 21, 2015, and July 15, 2015 (meeting
summaries can be found at ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14307B726, ML15104A065, ML15111A019, ML15147A677, ML15208A039,
respectively).
2

A. Mauer

-2-

deviation to expedite the review process. Licensee deviations from the application guidance
should be discussed in their high frequency confirmation submittal.
The NRC staff notes interactions are planned with NEI and industry stakeholders to develop a
high frequency confirmation submittal template. The submittal template is expected to include a
plant-specific description of stable condition sufficient to justify that the equipment list identified
to achieve this state adequately encompasses the scope. Near-term development of a
submittal template and example plant-specific descriptions of stable condition are important for
the successful implementation of the High Frequency Guidance report and will play a key role in
reducing the need for requests for additional information during the staff review.
As a preliminary implementation schedule for high frequency confirmation, he NRC staff agrees
with the industry’s implementation schedule proposed in NEI’s July 30, 2015, letter. The final
implementation schedule for this activity will be issued by the NRC in subsequent
communications as part of an integrated implementation schedule for the remaining Near Term
Task Force 2.1 Seismic assessments.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Stephen Wyman at 301-415-3041 or by email at
[email protected].
Sincerely,
/RA/
Jack R. Davis, Director
Japan Lessons-Learned Division
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

A. Mauer

-2-

deviation to expedite the review process. Licensee deviations from the application guidance
should be discussed in their high frequency confirmation submittal.
The NRC staff notes interactions are planned with NEI and industry stakeholders to develop a
high frequency confirmation submittal template. The submittal template is expected to include a
plant-specific description of stable condition sufficient to justify that the equipment list identified
to achieve this state adequately encompasses the scope. Near-term development of a
submittal template and example plant-specific descriptions of stable condition are important for
the successful implementation of the High Frequency Guidance report and will play a key role in
reducing the need for requests for additional information during the staff review.
As a preliminary implementation schedule for high frequency confirmation, he NRC staff agrees
with the industry’s implementation schedule proposed in NEI’s July 30, 2015, letter. The final
implementation schedule for this activity will be issued by the NRC in subsequent
communications as part of an integrated implementation schedule for the remaining Near Term
Task Force 2.1 Seismic assessments.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Stephen Wyman at 301-415-3041 or by email at
[email protected].
Sincerely,
/RA/
Jack R. Davis, Director
Japan Lessons-Learned Division
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC
Nrr_JLD_Mgmt
RidsNrrOd

RidsNsirOd
RidsOeMailCenter
RidsOgcMailCenter

RidsNrrLASLent
RidsOgcRp Resource

ADAMS Accession No.: ML15218A569

*concurrence via e-mail

OFFICE

NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM

NRR/JLD/LA

OGC*

NRO/DSEA/RGS2/BC*

NAME

SWyman (NDiFrancesco for)

SLent

HBenowitz

DJackson

DATE

08/11/15

08/07/15

08/27/15

09/16/15

OFFICE

NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC

NRR/JLD/D

NAME

MShams (VHall for)

JDavis

DATE

08/11/15

09/17/15
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy