1117-0033 60-Day Notice

1117-0033 60-Day Notice.pdf

Report of Mail Order Transactions

1117-0033 60-Day Notice

OMB: 1117-0033

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
9137

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Notices
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
Handbook on E-Filing, available on the
Commission’s website at https://
edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing.
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
investigations must be served on all
other parties to the investigations (as
identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: These investigations are
being conducted under authority of title
VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice
is published pursuant to section 207.21
of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 8, 2019.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–04591 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1117–0033]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection,
eComments Requested; Extension
Without Change of a Previously
Approved Collection Report of Mail
Order Transactions
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.

AGENCY:

ACTION:

60-Day notice.

The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until May
13, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments, especially on the
estimated public burden or associated
response time, suggestions, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Lynnette M. Wingert, Diversion
Control Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information proposed to be collected
can be enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of
SUMMARY:

amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES

Number of
annual
respondents

Number of
responses
per year

information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. Title of the Form/Collection: Report
of Mail Order Transactions.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form Number: None. The Department of
Justice component is the Drug
Enforcement Administration, Diversion
Control Division.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Affected public (Primary): Business or
other for-profit.
Affected public (Other): None.
Abstract: The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) collects
information regarding mail order
transactions conducted between a
person regulated by the agency and a
nonregulated person (that is, someone
who does not further distribute the
product) involving the chemicals
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine. Transactions
must use, or attempt to use, the United
States Postal Service or any private or
commercial carrier.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond:

Number of
annual
responses

Average
time per
response
(hours)

Total annual
hours

Mail Order Reports ..............................................................

9

12

108

1

108

Total ..............................................................................

9

N/A

108

N/A

108

6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
proposed collection: The DEA estimates
that this collection takes 108 annual
burden hours.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:45 Mar 12, 2019

Jkt 247001

If additional information is required,
please contact: Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, United
States Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution

PO 00000

Frm 00064

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Square, 145 N Street NE, Suite 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.

E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM

13MRN1

9138

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Notices

Dated: March 7, 2019.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2019–04516 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES

Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under The
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On March 7, 2019, the Department of
Justice lodged for public comment a
Consent Decree with defendants
Atlantic Wood Industries, Inc. (AWI),
and Atlantic Metrocast, Inc. (AMI), in
the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk
Division, Civil Action No. 2:19–cv–
00109. The proposed consent decree
resolves claims in a complaint that the
United States on behalf of EPA filed in
the Eastern District of Virginia asserting
claims under Section 107(a)(1) and (2)
of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a)(1)
and (2), against AWI as former owner
and operator and current owner of the
AWI Superfund Site, located in
Portsmouth, Virginia; and against its
subsidiary AMI as a current operator of
the Site. The Complaint also includes a
claim on behalf of the Department of the
Interior (DOI) through the Fish and
Wildlife Service and the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) against AWI
and AMI under CERCLA Section
107(a)(4)(C) for natural resources
damages. The Commonwealth of
Virginia also will file an uncontested
motion to intervene in the case to assert
claims against the United States on
behalf of the Navy and against AWI and
AMI under CERCLA and Virginia law,
which will also be resolved through the
proposed consent decree.
Under the proposed decree, AWI will
pay $250,000 with interest to Plaintiffs,
with $75,000 to the United States on
behalf of EPA, and $175,000 to Virginia,
in ten installment payments over nine
years from entry. It also agrees to retain
$15 million in CERCLA liability and a
lien on its real property against that
liability, which liability and lien will be
reduced to fifty percent of the appraised
value of the property after nine years
from entry of the Consent Decree, when
EPA expects the cleanup to be complete.
AWI further concedes title to Virginia to
new land that was created along its
waterfront as part of the remedial

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:45 Mar 12, 2019

Jkt 247001

action, and Virginia and EPA agree to a
division of rental income or sales
proceeds in connection with that new
land. AWI agrees as part of the
settlement to an environmental
covenant which will impose
institutional controls on its use of the
property and which AWI/AMI will
record so that it will run with the land.
Finally, AWI agrees to perform proper
operation and maintenance on its
property, both in the Consent Decree
and in a detailed appendix.
The United States on behalf of the
Navy and the Department of Defense
(‘‘DOD’’) resolves its potential liability
to AWI in the proposed decree, and
pays its equitable share of response
costs at the Site through a payment of
$55,325,966 to EPA from the Judgment
Fund. The United Sates will also pay
$8.5 million to Virginia from the
Judgment Fund for its share of Virginia’s
past costs and of the costs of Virginia’s
future operation and maintenance of the
Site. The Navy and DOD and Virginia
have agreed that if EPA requires future
groundwater treatment, then the Navy
and DOD will pay 50% of Virginia’s
response costs under a ‘‘pay go’’
arrangement where Virginia pays the
treatment costs up front and invoices
50% of the costs to the Navy and DOD
on a regular basis.
The proposed Consent Decree also
resolves the claims against the Navy and
DOD for natural resource damages of
NOAA, DOI, and the Commonwealth of
Virginia by payment from the Judgment
Fund of (1) $ 1.5 million to Virginia to
fund oyster restoration in the Southern
or Eastern Elizabeth River; and (2)
$94,660 to NOAA and DOI for their past
costs.
The Consent Decree contains standard
CERCLA covenants and reservations, as
well as a reopener for CERCLA natural
resource damage claims.
AWI agrees in the proposed Consent
Decree to dismiss with prejudice its
petition for review in Atlantic Wood
Industries, Inc. v. EPA (D.C. Cir.)
contending that EPA’s record of
decision impermissibly amends the NPL
listing for the Site by expanding the Site
boundaries to include sediments in the
Elizabeth River.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. Atlantic Wood
Industries, et al., Civil Action No. 2:19–
cv–00109, DOJ # 90–11–3–580/1. All
comments must be submitted no later
than 30 days after the publication date

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

of this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
To submit
comments:

Send them to:

By email .......

pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington,
D.C. 20044–7611.

By mail .........

During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $ 31.50 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury. For a paper copy
without the exhibits, the cost is $22.50.
Jeffrey Sands,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2019–04606 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act
On March 8, 2019, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
in the lawsuit entitled United States v.
Missouri Department of Natural
Resources, Division of State Parks, et al.,
Civil Action No. 4:19–cv–00421.
The United States filed this lawsuit
under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA). The United
States’ complaint names as the
Defendants the Missouri Department of
Natural Resources, Division of State
Parks and its director, Ben Ellis, in his
official capacity. The complaint seeks
recovery of costs that the United States
incurred responding to releases of
hazardous substances at the Big River
Mine Tailings Superfund Site in St.
Francois County, Missouri. The
complaint also seeks injunctive relief in
the form of the performance of the

E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM

13MRN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy