Burden Calculation Tables

1891t10 revised.xlsx

NESHAP for Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (40 CFR part 63, subpart VVV) (Renewal)

Burden Calculation Tables

OMB: 2060-0428

Document [xlsx]
Download: xlsx | pdf

Overview

Respondents
Responses
Respondent Burden
Agency Burden
Capital & O&M


Sheet 1: Respondents

Number of Respondents

Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Year Number of New Respondents Number of Existing Respondents Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents Number of Respondents





(E=A+B+C-D)
1 0.33 12 0 0 12.3
2 0.33 12.3 0 0 12.7
3 0.33 12.7 0 0 13.0
Average 0.33 12.3 0 0 12.7


Sheet 2: Responses

Total Annual Responses
(A)
Information Collection Activity
(B)
Number of Respondents
(C)
Number of Responses
(D)
Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports
(E)
Total Annual Responses
E=(BxC)+D

Initial notification 0.33 1 0 0.33
Notification of compliance status 0.33 1 0 0.33
Request for extension of compliance 0.33 1 0 0.33
Notification of special compliance requirements 0.33 1 0 0.33
Notification of initial performance test 0 1 0 0
Additional notification requirements for sources with CMS 0 1 0 0
Notification of adjustments to time periods 0.33 1 0 0.33
Notification of changes to information provided 0.33 1 0 0.33
30-day notification of excess emissions 0.33 1 0 0.33 Added burden item because this is an existing requirement for new sources only that was missing in the last ICR table.
Initial performance test report 0 1 0 0
Inspection and monitoring plan 0.33 1 0 0.33
Annual report 0.33 1 0 0.33 Revised from semiannual to annual per RTR. Does not apply to existing sources.
Annual excess emissions report 0.33 1 0 0.33 Revised from semiannual to annual per RTR. Does not apply to existing sources.
Initial report on compliance approach 0.33 1 0 0.33



Total 3.6
CMS - Continuous Monitoring System

hrs/response: 4.4
Assumes the new/reconstructed source to demonstrate compliance using the HAP fraction emitted standard, utilizing a combination of pretreatment and wastewater treatment plant modifications to achieve this performance standard. This compliance option does not require performance testing or a CMS.

Sheet 3: Respondent Burden

Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Publicly Owned Treatment Works (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart VVV) (Renewal)








Source Type No.












Existing 12.0






Tracy Curtis: Labor rates have been updated to reflect that these are publically owned facilities. Labor Rates: $48.08 $64.80 $26.02

New (other sectors) 0.33


Burden item A B C D E F G H





Person-hours
per occurrence
Annual occurrences
per respondent
Person-hours
per respondent
per year (AxB)
Respondents
per year a
Technical hours per
year (CxD)
Management hours per year (Ex0.05) Clerical hours
per year
(Ex0.10)
Annual cost
($) b



Agency Rates
Source: Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2017 General Schedule
1. Applications N/A









Labor Type Total Compensation ($/hr) Loaded Rate (Rate + 110%rate)
2. Surveys and studies N/A









(GS- 13, step 5) - Mgmt. 40.5 $64.80
3. Reporting requirements










(GS- 12, step 1) - Tech. 30.05 $48.08
A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements c 0.5 1 1 12 6 0.3 0.6 $323.53


(GS-6, step 3) - Cler. 16.26 $26.02
B. Required activities













Initial notification d 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Notification of compliance status d 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





C. Create information See 3B












D. Gather existing information See 3B












E. Write reports













Request for extension of compliance 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Notification of special compliance requirements 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Notification of initial performance test d N/A












Additional notification requirements for source with CMS d N/A












Notification of adjustments to time periods 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Notification of changes to information provided 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





30-day notification of excess emissions d 1 1 1 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.03 $17.94





Initial performance test report d N/A












Inspection and monitoring plan d 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Annual report d 1 1 1 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.03 $17.94





Annual excess emissions report d 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Initial report on compliance approach d, e 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Reporting Subtotal



14.5 $678.91





4. Recordkeeping













A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements See 3A












B. Plan activities See 3E












C. Implement activities See 3E












D. Develop record system See 3E












E. Time to enter information













Records of annual inspections d 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





Records of inspections, defects, and repair delays d 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50





F. Time to transmit or disclose information N/A












G. Time to train personnel N/A












H. Time for audits N/A












Recordkeeping Subtotal



1.5 $71.00





TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS (rounded)f



16 $750





TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COSTS (rounded)f






$0





GRAND TOTAL (rounded)f






$750





CMS - Continuous Monitoring System













N/A - Not Applicable




























Assumptions:













a EPA estimates 12 existing sources and one new/reconstructed source will be subject to the standard over the three-year period of this ICR.





b This ICR uses the following labor rates for publicly owned facilities: $48.08 (technical), $64.80 (managerial), and $26.02 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2017 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.





c This burden represents the time existing respondents spend familiarizing themselves with the regulatory requirements.





d New sources must install covers and controls, or comply with the HAP fraction emitted standard. Assumes one new/reconstructed source will demonstrate compliance using the HAP fraction emitted standard over the next three years, utilizing a combination of pretreatment and wastewater treatment plant modifications to achieve this performance standard. This compliance option does not require performance testing or a CMS, but does require initial notifications, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting.





e The NESHAP specifies that existing facilities are subject to the initial report; however, all existing facilities previously submitted the required information, so none will submit an initial report.





f Totals have been rounded to three significant digits. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.






Sheet 4: Agency Burden

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Publicly Owned Treatment Works (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart VVV) (Renewal)






























Labor Rates: $48.08 $64.80 $26.02





Burden item A B C D E F G H




EPA
person-hours
per occurrence
Annual occurrences
per respondent
EPA
person-hours
per respondent
per year (AxB)
Respondents
per year a
Technical hours
per year
(CxD)
Management
hours per year
(Ex0.05)
Clerical hours
per year
(Ex0.10)
Annual cost
($) b


Agency Rates
Source: Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2017 General Schedule
Initial performance test c N/A









Hourly Mean Wage With Fringe & Overhead
Repeat initial performance test c N/A








(GS- 12, step 1) - Tech. 30.05 $48.08
Report review









(GS- 13, step 5) - Mgmt. 40.5 $64.80
Initial notification 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50

(GS-6, step 3) - Cler. 16.26 $26.02
Notification of compliance status c 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50




Request for extension of compliance 0.5 1 1 0.33 0.17 0.01 0.02 $9.34




Notification of special compliance requirements c 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50




Notification of initial performance test c 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0




Additional notification requirements for sources with CMS c 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0




Notification of adjustments to time periods c 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50




Notification of changes to information provided 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50




30-day notification of excess emissions 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50




Initial performance test report c 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0




Inspection and monitoring plan c 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50




Annual report c 1 1 1 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.03 $17.94 Revised to annual report. Not required of existing sources.



Annual excess emissions report c 1 1 1 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.03 $17.94 Revised to annual report. Not required of existing sources.



Initial report on compliance approach c 2 1 2 0.33 0.66 0.03 0.07 $35.50




TOTAL d 7 $329




CMS - Continuous Monitoring System












N/A - Not Applicable


























Assumptions:












a EPA estimates 12 existing sources and one new/reconstructed source will be subject to the standard over the three-year period of this ICR.




b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $48.08 (technical), $64.80 (managerial), and $26.02 (clerical). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2017 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees.




c Existing sources have no notification and reporting activities under this NESHAP and demonstrate compliance with the rule by operating treatment and control devices that meet all requirements specified in the appropriate industrial NESHAP(s). New sources are subject to rule emission limits, control requirements, and related performance testing, plan development, and reporting activities. There is one new source expected to be subject to these requirements over the three-year period of this ICR.




d Totals have been rounded to three significant digits. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.





Sheet 5: Capital & O&M

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
EPA expects the new/reconstructed source to demonstrate compliance using the HAP fraction emitted standard, utilizing a combination of pretreatment and wastewater treatment plant modifications to achieve this performance standard. No new control or monitoring equipment (CMS) is expected.
File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy