NIST Generic Clearance for Community Resilience Data Collections

ICR 201906-0693-003

OMB: 0693-0078

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
244976 New
244684 New
244613 New
244612 New
244611 New
243521 New
242189 New
237507 New
236228 Modified
235486 Removed
235485 Removed
232587 Modified
231694 Removed
229100 Removed
229093 Removed
228828 Modified
ICR Details
0693-0078 201906-0693-003
Active 201806-0693-001
DOC/NIST MO
NIST Generic Clearance for Community Resilience Data Collections
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved with change 07/24/2019
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 06/18/2019
This collection is approved based on the revised materials provided by the Department.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
07/31/2022 36 Months From Approved 07/31/2019
20,000 0 15,000
15,000 0 12,000
0 0 0

Through acts such as the National Construction Safety Team Act (NCSTA) and the NIST Organic Act, among others, as well as the President's Climate Action Plan (2013), NIST conducts research and develops guidance and other related tools to promote and enhance the safety and well-being of people in the face of a hazard event. With this in mind, NIST proposes to conduct a number of data collection efforts within the topic areas of disaster and failure studies and community resilience and sustainability, including studies of specific disaster events (e.g., wildfire, urban fire, structure collapse, hurricane, earthquake, tornado, and flood events), assessments of community resilience and sustainability, and evaluations of the usability and utility of NIST guidance or other products. For example, one study may assess user perceptions and applications of the NIST “Community Resilience Planning Guide for Buildings and Infrastructure Systems” as well as adherence to building and fire codes and standards in community resilience planning. Another example may include the study of disaster impacts to community members due to a large-scale wildfire event. These data collection efforts may be either qualitative or quantitative in nature, or may consist of mixed methods. Additionally, data may be collected via a variety of means, including but not limited to electronic or social media, direct or indirect observation (i.e., in person, video and audio collections), interviews, questionnaires, and focus groups. NIST will limit its inquiries to data collections that solicit strictly voluntary opinions or responses. The results of the data collected will be used to decrease negative impacts of disasters on society, and, in turn, increase community resilience within the U.S. communities. Steps will be taken to ensure anonymity of respondents in each activity covered by this request.

None
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  84 FR 6134 02/26/2019
84 FR 27766 06/14/2019
No

11
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Wave 2B: Complex Event Resilience– SME Recovery from a Pandemic in the Face of Natural Hazard Risks Business Recovery/Continuity Collection
Survey to Assess Community Use of the NIST Community Resilience Planning Guide for Builders and Infrastructure Systems
Business/Non-Profit Disruption Survey NIST/NOAA 2019
One-year Post-Fire Survey of Emergency Communications and Public Response to the Chimney Tops 2 Fire in Sevier County, TN
Hurricane Maria Emergency Communications Investigation: Information Providers Interview
Two-Year Post-Hurricane Matthew Field Study in Lumberton, North Carolina Housing/Household Recovery Survey 2020
One-Year Post-Hurricane Matthew Field Study in Lumberton, North Carolina: Business Recovery Survey
Two-Year Post-Hurricane Matthew Field Study in Lumberton, North Carolina Business Recovery Survey 2020
Post-Disaster Event Field Survey: Business Recovery/Continuity Collection (NIST-NOAA Survey Tool)
Wildfire Business Recovery/Continuity Collection: Greater Lake Tahoe (NIST-NOAA Survey Tool)
Wave 2A: Complex Event Resilience– SME Recovery from a Pandemic in the Face of Natural Hazard Risks Business Recovery/Continuity Collection
Hurricane Maria Emergency Communications: Pilot Household Study
Two-Year Post-Hurricane Matthew Field Study in Lumberton, North Carolina Housing/Household Recovery Survey
One-Year Post-Hurricane Matthew Field Study in Lumberton, North Carolina: Housing/Household Recovery Survey
Two-Year Post-Hurricane Matthew Field Study in Lumberton, North Carolina Business Recovery Survey
Compound Risks – SME Recovery from a Pandemic in the Face of Natural Hazard Risks

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 20,000 15,000 0 5,000 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 15,000 12,000 0 3,000 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
NIST is seeking approval to increase the annual respondents from 15,000 to 20,000 and annual burden hours from 12,000 to 15,000 under this renewal request. These increases of 5,000 additional respondents and 3,000 additional hours are requested to cover current and future information collections under this request for a three (3) year renewal and will ensure that NIST remains compliant with the PRA.

$125,000
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
    No
    No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Jennifer Helgeson 301 975-6133

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/18/2019


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy